How well can quantitative 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring distinguish various degrees of reflux disease?

Esophageal pH increments associated with post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic waves show the occurrence and relevance of esophago-salivary reflex in clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Following acid perfusion, esophageal pH is restored by swallowed bicarbonate-containing saliva secreted in response to a vagal esophago-salivary reflex. At impedance-pH monitoring, the post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index puts into relationship timely post-reflux swallows with the number of reflux events: Low values typify reflux-related heartburn (RRH) and lack of on-therapy improvement characterizes proton pump inhibitor (PPI) failure. Considerable esophageal pH increments associated with PSPWs could demonstrate the occurrence of esophago-salivary reflex in clinical setting, while its relevance could be shown by lower esophageal pH increments in PPI-refractory RRH.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter study in patients with PPI-refractory or PPI-responsive RRH evaluated with off-PPI impedance-pH monitoring. Increments in pH associated with PSPWs were measured and the mean calculated to obtain the PSPW-associated ∆pH.

KEY RESULTS

The mean PSPW-associated ∆pH in 294 RRH patients was 1.2 ± 0.7 and was lower in 137 PPI-refractory (1.0 ± 0.6) than in 157 PPI-responsive (1.5 ± 0.6) cases (p < 0.0001). Lower PSPW-associated ∆pH was independently related to PPI failure at multivariable logistic regression analysis (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.26). At ROC analysis, comparing PPI-refractory to PPI-responsive cases the AUC for PSPW-associated ∆pH was 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.82), the best cutoff value being 1.2.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Considerable PSPW-associated pH increments demonstrate the occurrence of esophago-salivary reflex in clinical setting. Lower increments in PPI-refractory RRH cases show the clinical relevance of esophago-salivary reflex, confirming that PSPW represents a defense mechanism against reflux. PSPW-associated ∆pH can efficiently predict PPI response in patients undergoing off-therapy impedance-pH monitoring.

Normal acid exposure time in esophageal pH monitoring in Asian and Western populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small Asian studies have investigated the normal range of the AET; the range may be different from that in Western populations. We evaluated its normal range in healthy Asian compared to Western subjects.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed for studies that reported pH monitoring parameters in healthy subjects. Studies that reported the AET values of healthy subjects were eligible for the analyses. The upper limit of normal of the AET was obtained from the 95th percentile of the available raw data or calculated as the mean value +2 standard deviations.

KEY RESULTS

Nineteen Asian and 49 Western studies were assessed. The estimated AET values were analyzed using a bootstrapping technique, weighted according to the sample size. The mean AET was 1.1% and 2.9% in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The upper limit of the reference range was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.9%) and 8.2 (95% CI, 6.7-9.9) in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The normal AET differed between the Asian and Western populations because the CI of the two groups did not overlap.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The upper limit of normal of the AET in healthy Asian subjects was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7-3.9%), which was lower than that of healthy Western subjects.

Patterns of reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric population of New South Wales

This study is to determine the association of ambulatory pH monitoring (24hr pH) with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and its other investigations. The clinical and epidemiological profiles of subjects referred for reflux disorders are also studied. Symptoms or group of symptoms, profiles and prior investigations of 1259 consecutive pediatric subjects (with 1332 24hr pH studies performed) referred for evaluation of reflux disorders between 1988 and 2012 were retrospectively studied. Chi-square or fisher exact test was used for hypothesis testing, student t-test for the comparison of means and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparing medians of continuous variables. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), defined as reflux causing major symptoms and complications, was diagnosed in 57.5% subjects of the total sample. Forty-three percent were girls and 56.7% were boys. The most common age group was between 4 months and 2 years (51.2%). Vomiting (64.4%) and irritability (74%) were the most common symptoms with the neurological conditions (23.2%) being the most frequent underlying condition. The parameters used in 24hr pH were significantly higher in those diagnosed with GERD (P < 0.0001). The prevalence of GERD was found to be significantly higher when both gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms were present (P = 0.008) at 66.4% than when compared with gastrointestinal (56.5%) and respiratory (52.2%) symptoms in isolation. Symptoms alone were not reliable in diagnosing GERD. Only 57.5% had GERD among patients referred for reflux disorders. 24hr pH is reliable and should be considered routine in reflux disorders, as it identifies patients with pathologic reflux and avoids a needless surgery.

Risk of esophagitis among individuals born preterm or small for gestational age

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The association between gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal adenocarcinoma is likely to be mediated by inflammation. Reflux is common in infancy; the esophageal mucosa of infants born preterm or small for gestational age (SGA) could be particularly vulnerable. We investigated the association between preterm or SGA birth and risk of esophagitis early in life.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Swedish birth register and the Swedish patient register to identify birth characteristics of individuals with endoscopically verified esophagitis from 1973 to 2007 and to determine their outcomes (7358 cases). Five controls were selected randomly and matched with each case (N = 38,479). Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to provide odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential confounding.

RESULTS

The risk of esophagitis was increased among individuals born preterm (≤32 gestational weeks) (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.15-3.49) or SGA (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32-1.68). When data were stratified by age at diagnosis and by sex, different risk patterns appeared. Among individuals diagnosed with esophagitis 9 years of age and younger, the OR for prematurity was 6.82 (95% CI, 4.65-10.03) and the OR for SGA at birth was 1.98 (95% CI, 1.55-2.52). Furthermore, the association with preterm birth was stronger among males (OR, 9.88; 95%, CI 5.93-16.45) than females (OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.81-6.41), whereas the association with SGA was stronger among females (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.76-3.55) than males (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.16-2.30). The risk of being diagnosed with esophagitis at age 20 or younger was not associated with preterm birth (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.64-1.63), but was associated with being SGA at birth (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm birth is associated with esophagitis only during childhood, whereas SGA birth is associated with esophagitis during adolescence as well. The associations appear to differ between sexes.

Diagnostic yield of 96-h wireless pH monitoring and usefulness in patients' management

OBJECTIVE

To get insight into usefulness of 96-h wireless monitoring in diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and in patients' management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

51 patients who underwent 96-h wireless and 51 matched patients who underwent 24-h traditional pH monitoring were enrolled and retrospectively contacted with a structured telephone interview.

RESULTS

In the wireless group, the 96-h recording improved (p < 0.05) the diagnostic yield compared with the first 48-h recording by allowing Symptom Association Probability to be measured in eight more patients and by decreasing indeterminate tests from 11 to 5. After pH monitoring, concordance between results of the test and treatment for GERD was higher in the wireless compared with the traditional group, 78% versus 58% of the patients (p < 0.05). Both improvement/disappearance of the clinically relevant symptom and satisfaction (score of 1-10) at time of the telephone interview were however similar in the two groups, 73% versus 65% and 7.0 versus 6.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Wireless pH monitoring prolonged to 96 h increased the likelihood to exclude/confirm GERD as the cause of the clinically relevant symptoms in those patients with an indeterminate result for GERD after the first 48 h. Outcome was however similar to the one of traditional pH monitoring.

Comparative study of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and esomeprazole for symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis

AIM: To clarify whether there is any difference in the symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis following the administration of four Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-four patients with erosive reflux esophagitis were randomized to receive 8 wk of 20 mg omeprazole (n = 68), 30 mg of lansoprazole (n = 69), 40 mg of pantoprazole (n = 69), 40 mg of esomeprazole (n = 68) once a day in the morning. Daily changes in heartburn and acid reflux symptoms in the first 7 d of administration were assessed using a six-point scale (0: none; 1: mild; 2: mild-moderate; 3: moderate; 4: moderate-severe; 5: severe).

RESULTS: The mean heartburn score in patients treated with esomeprazole more rapidly decreased than those receiving other PPI. Complete resolution of heartburn was also more rapid in patients treated with esomeprazole for 5 d compared with omeprazole (P = 0.0018, P = 0.0098, P = 0.0027, P = 0.0137, P = 0.0069, respectively), lansoprazole (P = 0.0020, P = 0.0046, P = 0.0037, P = 0.0016, P = 0.0076, respectively), and pantoprazole (P = 0.0006, P = 0.0005, P = 0.0009, P = 0.0031, P = 0.0119, respectively). There were no significant differences between the four groups in the rate of endoscopic healing of reflux esophagitis at week 8.

CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole may be more effective than omeprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole for the rapid relief of heartburn symptoms and acid reflux symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Time esophageal pH < 4 overestimates the prevalence of pathologic esophageal reflux in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with proton pump inhibitors

Background

A Stanford University study reported that in asymptomatic GERD patients who were being treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), 50% had pathologic esophageal acid exposure.

Aim

We considered the possibility that the high prevalence of pathologic esophageal reflux might simply have resulted from calculating acidity as time pH < 4.

Methods

We calculated integrated acidity and time pH < 4 from the 49 recordings of 24-hour gastric and esophageal pH from the Stanford study as well as from another study of 57 GERD subjects, 26 of whom were treated for 8 days with 20 mg omeprazole or 20 mg rabeprazole in a 2-way crossover fashion.

Results

The prevalence of pathologic 24-hour esophageal reflux in both studies was significantly higher when measured as time pH < 4 than when measured as integrated acidity. This difference was entirely attributable to a difference between the two measures during the nocturnal period. Nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough was not a useful predictor of pathologic nocturnal esophageal reflux.

Conclusion

In GERD subjects treated with a PPI, measuring time esophageal pH < 4 will significantly overestimate the prevalence of pathologic esophageal acid exposure over 24 hours and during the nocturnal period.

Impact of feedback and didactic sessions on the reporting behavior of upper endoscopic findings by physicians and nurses

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines for reporting Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements and reflux esophagitis grades have been developed to improve consistency, communication, and, ultimately, patient care. Our aims were to assess the percentage of cases in which findings were reported in accordance with guidelines and to assess the impact of education and feedback on reporting behavior.

METHODS

Prospective cross-sectional study design was used. Chart reviews were performed for all adult patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a tertiary care center during three 2-month time periods during a 12-month interval: Time 1 (March 1, 2004-April 30, 2004), Time 2 (July 1, 2004-August 31, 2004), and Time 3 (March 1, 2005-April 30, 2005). Standardized educational sessions began 2 years before Time 1. No intervention took place between Time 1 and Time 2; data were collected to examine secular change. Between Time 2 and Time 3, individual and group feedback and refresher sessions were given.

RESULTS

Five thousand six hundred nine eligible esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, of which 2675 demonstrated Barrett's esophagus, hiatal hernia, and/or reflux esophagitis. At baseline, Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia measurements were dictated correctly in a median of 67% and 86% of cases, respectively, improving to 100% (P < .05) and 98% (P < .01) of cases, respectively. The Los Angeles Classification system was used in a median of 100% of cases at baseline and at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Anonymous individual and group feedback, in combination with brief, structured didactic educational sessions, significantly improves compliance with established guidelines for the reporting of Barrett's esophagus and hiatal hernia. Once successfully incorporated into clinical practice, adherence to the esophagitis Los Angeles Classification System is easy to maintain.

Difference in localization of esophageal mucosal breaks among grades of esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux occurs mainly during the daytime in patients with Los Angeles grade A esophagitis, but predominantly during the night in patients with grade C and D esophagitis. The purpose of the present paper was to investigate whether this difference in the pattern of gastroesophageal reflux influences the circumferential localization of erosions in the esophageal wall.

METHODS

The subjects were 394 consecutive patients diagnosed endoscopically as having reflux esophagitis (grade A, n = 223; B, n = 93; C, n = 53; D, n = 25 cases). Their endoscopic films were reviewed retrospectively to determine the circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks, and also the prevalence and size of hiatal hernia (HH).

RESULTS

The numbers of mucosal breaks analyzed in patients with grade A, B and C esophagitis were 321, 173 and 54, respectively. Patients with grade A and B esophagitis had longitudinal mucosal breaks mainly in the right-anterior wall of the lower esophagus, whereas patients with grade C esophagitis had transverse mucosal breaks mainly in the posterior wall. The prevalence and size of HH was significantly higher and larger, respectively, in patients with grade C or D esophagitis than in those with grade A and B esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

The circumferential location of esophageal mucosal breaks differs significantly among different grades of esophagitis.

Diagnostic value of potent acid inhibition in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is defined as 'Chronic symptoms or mucosal damage produced by abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus'. The Genval Workshop Report defines that GORD exists when the frequency of heartburn is equal to or greater than 2 days/week and that it is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions in the general population. Endoscopy is the most recommendable exploratory procedure in a patient with symptoms of GORD, fundamentally heartburn and regurgitation. However, 50-75% of the patients with symptoms compatible with GORD have normal endoscopy. Thus, endoscopy does not appear to be indispensable in a large group of patients with GORD. Endoscopy is therefore the gold standard for the diagnosis of reflux oesophagitis (histopathological changes in the oesophageal mucosa), but there is no gold standard for the diagnosis of non-erosive GORD. Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring has come to be considered the most sensitive and specific test in the diagnosis of GORD, but a significant proportion of patients (about 25%) have symptoms compatible with GORD and have 24-h pH monitoring results that can be considered normal. Besides, demonstrating the presence of acid reflux alone does not prove that it is the cause of suspected GORD-related signs or symptoms. Therefore, despite 'positive' pH studies, there is a significant number of patients failing to respond to therapy, mainly ear, nose and throat complaints, supposed as manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Despite 24-h oesophageal pH testing being an excellent diagnostic tool, it has no utility in routine clinical settings and hence its availability should be limited to tertiary care settings. With the demonstration that antisecretory treatment with high doses of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for 1 week or 2 weeks achieves significant improvement or even remission of the symptoms of GORD, it not surprising that it has been proposed as a diagnostic test for the disease. For patients with symptoms compatible with GORD without alarm symptoms or other suspected complications of GORD, a short course of empiric PPI therapy gives valuable information about the presence of GORD. The PPI test is a simple, sensitive and cost-effective tool, but it has insufficient specificity for use as an objective criterion alone. The use of PPIs both as a diagnostic test (1-2 weeks) and as a diagnostic-therapeutic test (1-4 months) has a moderate usefulness and may be used especially in those environments in which there are difficulties in performing the objective test.

Gastroesophageal reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common disease of the gastrointestinal system. Heartburn, regurgitation, and dysphagia are the most common symptoms of GERD. However, chest pain, chronic cough, laryngitis, hoarseness, and other otolaryngologic manifestation can be the primary manifestations of the disease. Endoscopy, barium studies, and especially pH monitoring and therapeutic trials may help in establishing the diagnosis of GERD. The introduction of H2 antagonists and especially of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has brought symptomatic relief in most patients. However, surgical procedures, especially laparoscopic fundoplication, are still required in some patients. Barrett's esophagitis is the most common complication of GERD and is associated with a high prevalence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Whether or not treatment with either PPIs or H2 antagonists can prevent this complication is still under investigation.

Helicobacter pylori infection influences symptomatic response to anti-secretory therapy in patients with GORD--crossover comparative study with famotidine and low-dose lansoprazole

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Helicobacter pylori infection was reported to affect gastric acid secretion. We investigated the heartburn symptoms of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during sequential treatment with 40 mg of famotidine or 15 mg of lansoprazole to clarify whether H. pylori infection influences symptomatic response to anti-secretory therapy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The subjects were 33 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, who had already been treated with a full dose of H2 receptor antagonist. First, famotidine at 20 mg b.i.d. was administered to the patients for 8 weeks. Second, famotidine was replaced with 15 mg of lansoprazole once in the morning for 8 weeks. Finally, 20 mg of famotidine was administered b.i.d. for 8 weeks instead of lansoprazole. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms were assessed using an original visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

The sequential symptomatic responses to famotidine and lansoprazole administration indicated that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms of patients during low-dose lansoprazole treatment were significantly less than those during famotidine treatment. Remission of symptoms was obtained significantly more often by famotidine therapy in patients with H. pylori infection than in patients without H. pylori infection.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose lansoprazole is more effective than full-dose famotidine for the control of symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and H. pylori infection influences the symptomatic response to H2 receptor antagonists.

Postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity is a reliable predictor of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Measurement of oesophageal acid exposure parameters postprandially has been shown to distinguish gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients from normal individuals.

AIMS

To calculate the accuracy of postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

Ambulatory 24-h pH studies of 626 patients were analysed retrospectively. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, defined as pH < 4 for > 4.2% of time, was identified in 305 subjects. Postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity was measured for 2 and 3 h after the largest meal peak as determined from gastric pH. Postprandial symptom-associated probability was calculated.

RESULTS

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects had a greater postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity than non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects [median (IQR): 0.57 (0.08-2.66) vs. 0.03 (0.01-0.15) mmol*h/L]. Median postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity did not differ with gender or age in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects (P > 0.05 for all). A 3-h postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity value of 0.121 mmol*h/L had a 71.1% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity in diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects with symptoms had a higher postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity than those without (P = 0.043), whereas non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects with and without symptoms did not differ (P = 0.74). The correlation between symptom-associated probability and postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity was poor (gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: r = 0.15; non-gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: r = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Postprandial oesophageal integrated acidity provides a robust estimation of oesophageal acid exposure and may predict symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.

Oesophageal pH has a power-law distribution in control and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects

BACKGROUND

We are unaware of any solid theoretical or pathophysiological basis for selecting pH 4 or any other pH value to assess oesophageal acid exposure or to define oesophageal reflux episodes.

AIM

To examine the frequency of different oesophageal pH values in control and GERD subjects.

METHODS

Oesophageal pH was measured for 24 h in 57 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects and 26 control subjects. Histograms were constructed using the 21,600 values from each recording and bins of 0.25 pH units.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease subjects had significantly more low pH values and significantly fewer high pH values. In both gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and control subjects, the frequency of oesophageal pH values was characterized by a power-law distribution indicating that the same relationship that describes low pH values also describes high pH values, as well as all values in between.

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of oesophageal pH values indicates that a variety of different pH values can be used to assess oesophageal acid exposure, but raises important questions regarding how oesophageal reflux episodes are defined.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease beyond infancy

BACKGROUND

Children beyond infancy (>12 months of age) rarely have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Underlying diseases may contribute to the persistence of GERD from infancy to childhood. This study compares the clinical course of children with GERD with and without underlying diseases.

METHODS

The authors studied the role of underlying diseases responsible for GERD in children beyond infancy by a retrospective analysis. From 1985 to 2000, GERD was confirmed in 34 children beyond infancy in the National Taiwan University (median age 2.5 years, range 1.1-9.7 years), according to the inclusion criteria of reflux symptoms and the fraction of pH < 4 above 5% in the 24-h esophageal pH study. The patients were divided into two groups: those without underlying diseases (n=10) and those with underlying diseases (n=24). The follow-up duration was 0.5-17.1 years (median 4.5 years).

RESULTS

The underlying diseases responsible for GERD in 24 children included neurological impairment (n=14), repaired esophageal atresia (n=2), hiatal hernia (n=3), repaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n=2), and congenital heart disease (n=3). At the end of the study, 9 of 10 children with GERD beyond infancy and without underlying diseases were free of symptoms without any need for further medical treatment. In contrast, 10 of 14 children with neurological disorders had persisting reflux symptoms (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P=0.02, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological impairment and esophageal or diaphragmatic anatomic abnormalities were frequently associated with GERD beyond infancy. Children with underlying diseases, especially with neurological impairment, ran a refractory course, while those without underlying diseases enjoyed a longer symptom-free life.

Acid, weakly acidic and non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux: differences, prevalence and clinical relevance

In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oesophageal symptoms and mucosal damage traditionally are related to acid-reflux episodes with pH lower than 4. Oesophageal or extra-oesophageal symptoms of GORD may also be associated with less acidic reflux (pH 4-7). New methodologies have evolved to complement pH monitoring for characterisation of less acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux. This review will focus on definition, detection, pathophysiology and symptom association of weakly acidic and non-acid reflux, in both adult and paediatric populations.

The association of gastroesophageal reflux disease with asthma and chronic cough in the adult

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition which is particularly prevalent in patients with asthma and chronic cough. Physiologic changes caused by asthma and chronic cough promote acid reflux. GERD is also considered by many investigators as a factor contributing to airway inflammation. An etiological relationship between GERD and asthma/chronic cough and vice versa has been supported by a large number of experimental and clinical findings and refuted by others. Although further controlled studies are needed to clarify this relationship, GERD and asthma/chronic cough appear to be linked to each other. The association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough involves nerve reflexes, cytokines, inflammatory and neuroendocrine cells and, in some patients, tracheal aspiration of refluxing gastric fluids. GERD may present with typical symptoms but can also be asymptomatic. Sensitive methods for diagnosing GERD are available, which include esophageal pH monitoring, acid provocative tests, modified barium swallow and endoscopy. Consideration of the association of GERD with asthma and chronic cough is of practical value in the management of chronic cough or asthma resistant to treatment. Treatment of GERD in patients with asthma has been consistently shown to improve respiratory symptoms but not necessarily pulmonary function tests. Surgical treatment can be a useful and cost-effective approach in selected patients with asthma and GERD.

Symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis: comparative study of omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Rabeprazole has a faster onset of antisecretory activity than omeprazole and lansoprazole. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether there is any difference in the speed of symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis following the administration of these three proton pump inhibitors (PPI).

METHODS

Eighty-five patients with erosive reflux esophagitis were randomized to receive 8 weeks of 20 mg of omeprazole (n = 30), 30 mg of lansoprazole (n = 25), or 20 mg of rabeprazole (n = 30) once a morning. Daily changes in heartburn and acid reflux symptoms in the first 7 days of administration were assessed using a six-point scale (0: none, 1: mild, 2: mild-moderate, 3: moderate, 4: moderate-severe, 5: severe).

RESULTS

The mean heartburn score in patients administered rabeprazole decreased more rapidly than those given the other PPI. Complete heartburn remission also occurred more rapidly in patients administered rabeprazole (compared with omeprazole: P = 0.035, compared with lansoprazole: P = 0.038 by log-rank test). No differences were seen in the rate of endoscopic healing of reflux esophagitis at 8 weeks between the three treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

Rabeprazole may be more effective than omeprazole and lansoprazole for the rapid relief of heartburn symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Symptoms Versus pH Monitoring Results

OBJECTIVES: The reason why some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms of upper aerodigestive system irritation, while others mainly have gastroenterologic symptoms, is not well established. This retrospective case series study was designed to examine the existence of a correlation between symptoms and reflux characteristics, based on data obtained from esophageal pH monitoring.

METHODS: The study population consisted of 139 patients; 97 patients presented with laryngopharyngeal symptoms of GERD, including unexplained hoarseness, throat clearing, chronic cough, laryngospasm, globus, throat pain, and 42 patients presented with gastroenterologic symptoms, including heartburn and regurgitation. The results of 24-hour, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing 2 symptom groups. The incidence of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments and the effects of upright and supine positions on reflux parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS: The incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux was significantly higher in the laryngopharyngeal symptom group than in the other (52% versus 38%). The patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux from both groups showed no significant differences in terms of number of acid reflux episodes, percentage of times pH was <4, and esophageal acid clearance. Upright and supine parameters did not show significant differences between the patient groups. Upright acid reflux episodes were, however, common in both groups at the lower esophageal and laryngopharyngeal segments.

CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggesting that otolaryngologic patients commonly show upright, daytime reflux with normal esophageal clearance and that typical GERD patients commonly have supine, nocturnal reflux with prolonged esophageal clearance are not supported by this study. This study indicates that acid reflux parameters and positional changes are not sufficient to explain why patients with GERD experience different symptoms. The regional symptoms of GERD may be attributed to the impairment of epithelial resistance, motor activity, and buffering systems for the esophageal antireflux barrier.

Predominant nocturnal acid reflux in patients with Los Angeles grade C and D reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough (NAB) is defined as an intragastric pH < 4.0 lasting more than 1 h during the night in patients taking a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with nocturnal gastroesophageal acid reflux accompanied by NAB are thought to be refractory to PPI treatment. The aim of this study was to endoscopically identify the patients with predominant nocturnal gastroesophageal acid reflux.

METHODS

The subjects were 37 patients with erosive reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles classification (LA) grade A, 12; B, 10; C, eight; and D, seven cases) and a control group of 20 patients without esophagitis. The results of ambulatory 24 h gastric and esophageal pH monitoring were compared among different grades of esophagitis.

RESULTS

Gastroesophageal reflux during 24 h in patients with high-grade esophagitis was more frequent than for patients with low-grade esophagitis or no esophagitis. Although the length of esophageal acid exposure (percentage time with pH < 4.0) in patients with grade A or without esophagitis was longer in the daytime, that in patients with grades C and D was longer during the night. The reason for the delayed nocturnal acid exposure was the longer nocturnal acid clearance in high-grade reflux esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Nocturnal exposure of the esophagus to acid occurs frequently in patients with LA grades C and D esophagitis. Thus, the existence of NAB with resulting nocturnal acid reflux should be considered when the patient with high-grade esophagitis shows resistance to PPI treatment.

Strategies for medical management of reflux disease

Management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) patients must consider two issues: (i) how to optimize the treatment of a presenting symptom complex, and (ii) how to manage risk of adenocarcinoma associated with GORD. In most cases the need for, and potency of, pharmacological therapy used is decided by symptom assessment. Considering cost effectiveness, the three increments of pharmacological therapy are: (i) generic histamine(2)receptor antagonists, (ii) standard dose proton pump inhibitors, and (iii) higher dose proton pump inhibitors. Endoscopy is warranted if there is doubt regarding the diagnosis of GORD or if the patient relays alarm symptoms suggesting more ominous diagnoses (dysphagia, bleeding, weight loss, odynophagia). The other major indication for endoscopy is to screen for adenocarcinoma or Barrett's metaplasia in the patient with chronic symptoms. In most patients, the need for maintenance medical therapy is determined by the rapidity of symptom recurrence during a trial period off the medication.

The influence of age on gastro-oesophageal reflux: a re-appraisal of the DeMeester scoring system

OBJECTIVE

The statistical evaluation of the influence of age on the pattern of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) identified by prolonged pH monitoring in asymptomatic subjects. Re-appraisal of the DeMeester scoring system for GOR.

METHOD

Prolonged pH monitoring was performed on 45 asymptomatic elderly adults with normal contrast oesophagogram, manometry and endoscopy. They included 36 males and nine females. The mean age was 66.6 years. The monitoring time ranged between 20 and 24 h, including one complete daily feeding cycle. GOR was defined as a reflux event with a pH of <4. The mean, standard deviation, kurtosis and skew were calculated for six parameters listed in the results. The mean values were compared with those of normal values determined by DeMeester et al. (in: Read NW, editor. Gastrointestinal motility: which test? 1989, pp. 43-52) from their study of 50 young healthy adults, and the t-test was applied to determine the statistical significance of differences. The 'null hypothesis' for each parameter was defined as 'the mean values of the elderly population are not statistically different from DeMeester's normal values'.

RESULTS

The means (+/-SD) of six parameters studied in pH monitoring were as follows: supine reflux time as a percentage of total study time, 2.94+/-5.18%; upright reflux time as a percentage of total study time, 4.14+/-5.71%; total reflux time as a percentage of total study time, 3.5+/-4.38%; duration of longest reflux episode, 14.98+/-24.92 min; number of reflux episodes lasting >5 min, 1.76+/-2.75; total number of reflux episodes during study, 13.49+/-11.31. These results were significantly different from the normal values reported by DeMeester. In addition, the data for each individual parameter was grossly skewed, as well as kurtotic, which implied that the data did not represent a normally distributed population. Moreover, we believe that the equation used for calculation of the DeMeester score, is inappropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis is rejected as the mean values of these parameters in our group are significantly higher than those used as normal. This implies that the normal values defined by DeMeester would over-diagnose gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Moreover, we have found that the formula used to calculate the DeMeester's score is not according to the principle it is based on. DeMeester's system scoring is therefore inappropriate.

Medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is common and is a chronic recurring condition. In view of our improved knowledge about the pathogenesis and complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux, the therapy should be individualized and a cost-effective approach should be attempted in its management.

Diagnostic evaluation in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) describes the clinical manifestations of reflux of gastric contents and the associated symptoms and patterns of tissue injury. Although its exact prevalence is difficult to determine, there is no doubt the GERD is the most common esophageal disease and probably among the most prevalent conditions seen in the primary care setting. GERD has a wide clinical spectrum, making the diagnostic evaluation challenging and complicated at times. Confirmatory test are rarely needed in patients with typical symptoms of heartburn or regurgitation who have a good clinical response to GERD therapy. This article describes the diagnostic tests necessary for some cases of GERD.

Area under pH 4: a more sensitive parameter for the quantitative analysis of esophageal acid exposure in adults

OBJECTIVE

Traditional quantitative analysis of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring data does not include the pH of reflux episodes. Area under pH 4 (AU4) is a recently introduced parameter that describes the acid exposure rate through both duration and depth of pH falls.

METHODS

In Study A, we enrolled 20 healthy controls and 42 patients (18 without esophagitis, 24 with Savary I-III esophagitis) in a study evaluating reference values for 24-h reflux time at pH <4 (RT) and 24-h AU4 by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) discriminant analysis. For Study B, we next prospectively applied the resulting cutoffs to 16 healthy controls and to 110 gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) patients (55 with esophagitis) to adjust sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of both RT and AU4.

RESULTS

In Study A, the best cutoff values were 5.1% for RT (Area Index +/- SE, 0.899 +/- 0.038; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 0.796 +/- 0.961) and 36.1 pH x min for AU4 (Area Index +/- SE, 0.935 +/- 0.03; 95% C.I., 0.842 +/- 0.981); AU4 gave the best performance (p = 0.038 vs RT) in discriminating controls and GERD patients. In Study B, RT was abnormal in three controls and 79 patients; AU4 identified all the controls and patients with abnormal RT and also 10/31 patients (32.3%) with so-called "normal" acid exposure (according to RT). In the whole GERD group of patients, AU4 and RT specificity was 81.2%, whereas sensitivity was 71.8% for RT and 80.9% for AU4 (chi2, 61.831; DF, 1; p < 0.005); PPV/NPV were 96.3%/29.5% for RT, and 96.7%/38.2% for AU4.

CONCLUSIONS

AU4 appears to be a simple and sensitive quantitative parameter to measure the esophageal acid exposure in adults submitted to 24-h pH monitoring, and it could be an useful clinical aid in evaluating normal RT tests where, from a clinical point of view, a reflux disease is highly likely.

On demand therapy with omeprazole for the long-term management of patients with heartburn without oesophagitis--a placebo-controlled randomized trial

AIM

To observe the natural course of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients without oesophagitis following effective symptom relief, and to determine the place of acid pump inhibitor therapy in the long-term management of these patients.

METHODS

We investigated the efficacy of on-demand therapy with omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg, or placebo in a double-blind, randomized multicentre trial. It involved 424 patients with troublesome heartburn without endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis in whom heartburn had been resolved with short-term treatment. Patients were told to take study medication on demand once daily on recurrence of symptoms until symptoms resolved over a 6-month period. They also had access to antacids. The primary efficacy variable was time to discontinuation of treatment, due to unwillingness to continue.

RESULTS

According to life-table analysis, after 6 months the remission rates were 83% (95% CI: 77-89%) with omeprazole 20 mg, 69% (61-77%) with omeprazole 10 mg, and 56% (46-64%) with placebo (P < 0.01 for all intergroup differences). The mean (s.d.) number of study medications used per day in these groups was 0.43 (0.27), 0.41 (0.27) and 0.47 (0.27), respectively. The use of antacids was highest in the placebo group and lowest in the omeprazole 20 mg group. Treatment failure was associated with more than a doubling of antacid use, and a deterioration in patient quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 50% of patients with heartburn who do not have oesophagitis need acid inhibitory therapy in addition to antacid medication to maintain a normal quality of life. On-demand therapy with omeprazole 20 mg, is an effective treatment strategy in these patients.

Is the esophageal squamous epithelial barrier function impaired in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease?

BACKGROUND

A disturbed epithelial barrier function has been promoted as one factor in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We therefore studied the effect of acid perfusion on the transmural potential difference (PD) of the distal esophagus in relation to onset of reflux symptoms.

METHODS

PD was assessed during perfusion with saline and with 0.1 M HCl in healthy controls (n = 17) and in GERD patients without (n = 15) or with esophagitis (n = 6) and in remission after a fundoplication (n = 10). Heartburn and other upper GI symptoms were recorded concomitantly. Endoscopy-negative patients were studied before and after omeprazole treatment.

RESULTS

HCl perfusion induced more lumennegative peak PD values in patients with active GERD, regardless of the presence or absence of esophagitis, than in healthy controls. After successful therapy, the PD response to acid perfusion equalled that of healthy subjects. Acid perfusion was associated with the onset of heartburn in most patients with active GERD but in none of the healthy subjects, and less frequently after medical and surgical therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The epithelial permeability to hydrogen ions differs between healthy subjects and patients with active GERD. Effective treatment, such as omeprazole or fundoplication, might improve the barrier function.

The usefulness of a structured questionnaire in the assessment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) rests primarily on recognition of symptom patterns that are classical for reflux disease, but little attention has been paid to the use of a formal questionnaire for identifying such symptom patterns.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire was developed which has seven items that focus on the nature of the symptoms and the precipitating, exacerbating, and relieving factors. The diagnostic validity of the questionnaire was tested against endoscopy and 24-h pH monitoring. A further evaluation was undertaken in patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD and in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia, to identify factors that might predict symptom relief during treatment with omeprazole.

RESULTS

When endoscopic esophageal mucosal breaks and 24-h pH data were used as criteria for the diagnosis of GERD, the questionnaire had a sensitivity of 92% but a very low specificity of 19%. Symptom relief during treatment with omeprazole was predicted by the presence of heartburn, described as 'a burning feeling rising from the stomach or lower chest up towards the neck' (P = 0.004), and 'relief from antacids' (P = 0.02). In non-ulcer dyspepsia a positive response to omeprazole was confined to the subgroup of patients who identified their main discomfort as heartburn as described above.

CONCLUSION

The present questionnaire using descriptive language usefully identified heartburn in patients presenting with upper abdominal symptoms, and this symptom predicted symptom resolution during treatment with omeprazole.

Relationship between severity and symptoms of reflux oesophagitis in elderly patients in Japan

Since information concerning reflux oesophagitis in the elderly is limited, particularly in Japan, the severity and symptomatic profiles of reflux oesophagitis in elderly patients were investigated. One hundred and nineteen patients with reflux oesophagitis found among 2278 endoscopy cases between 1993 and 1996 were investigated in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, elderly and non-elderly. The severity of reflux oesophagitis was estimated by the Los Angeles classification. The presence or absence of typical symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) was determined by interview. Reflux oesophagitis was not only more frequently found in the elderly group, but was more severe than in the non-elderly. Although the degree of manifestation of typical symptoms was similar between the elderly and the non-elderly with high-grade oesophagitis, the elderly patients with mild reflux oesophagitis were less symptomatic than the non-elderly. Mild reflux oesophagitis in the elderly may be missed due to its rarity of typical reflux symptoms and a substantial number of elderly persons might have subclinical reflux oesophagitis.

Ambulatory esophageal pH testing. Referral patterns, indication, and treatment in a Canadian teaching hospital

Over a 30-month period, 867 esophageal pH studies were conducted in a Canadian teaching hospital; of these, 315 tests were recorded in patients who were first-time referrals having no chest or upper gastrointestinal surgery and taking no medication that would affect the results. Patients were referred by gastroenterologists, general surgeons, ENT surgeons, thoracic surgeons, and a miscellaneous group. Patients were classified based on: pH results [abnormal = % total time pH < 4.0 (ie, > 6.0%)], manometry (abnormal = LES resting pressure < 5 mm Hg and/or abnormal peristalsis), and gender. Fifty-one percent (162/315) of the patient records demonstrated abnormal reflux. Intergroup comparisons of severity of reflux using two-way analysis of variance demonstrated no significant differences (P = 0.13). In the 162 patients who refluxed, 70% (N = 108) had normal motility studies; however, when the severity of reflux was compared, patients with abnormal motility (N = 54) demonstrated significantly more severe reflux (19.8 +/- 12.8 vs 16.2 +/- 11.3) P = 0.02. In those patients with abnormal manometry, no significant differences (P = 0.44) in the severity of reflux were found among those with abnormal peristalsis (N = 27), low resting pressure (N = 17), or a combination of aperistalsis and low LES pressure (N = 10). Symptomatic patients with reflux (N = 107) demonstrated a significantly greater percent time pH < 4.0 than those with asymptomatic reflux (N = 55); 18.1 +/- 11.5% vs 16.2 +/- 12.7%, P = 0.04. When the severity of reflux by gender was compared, no significant differences were found [18.3 +/- 11.9 (male) N = 91 vs 16.2 +/- 11.9 (female) N = 71, P = 0.11]. The results from this study show that: (1) esophageal pH testing is important in subspecialties other than gastroenterology and that the clinical yield is high in all referring groups, (2) esophageal pH testing and manometry are complimentary tests, but that reflux occurs commonly in association with normal manometry, (3) asymptomatic reflux was found in 34% of the patients with abnormal reflux scores, and (4) the severity of reflux in male and female patients is similar.

Esophageal motility and reflux testing. State-of-the-art and clinical role in the twenty-first century

Esophageal function testing has an important place in the investigation of a significant proportion of patients with esophageal disorders. Appropriate application of these tests requires a proper understanding of their capabilities and limitations and careful primary assessment by other modalities. Esophageal manometry is most useful for assessing significant troublesome dysphagia in the absence of organic obstruction. Esophageal pH monitoring is an important adjunct to clinical assessment and endoscopy in the diagnosis of reflux disease. Although it is the gold standard for the measurement of esophageal acid exposure and assessment of the relationship of symptoms to reflux, there are weakness in both of these functions that should be understood when applying the test to the diagnosis of reflux disease.