Impact of surgeon's technique on outcome after treatment of rectal carcinoma

Specialty-Certified Colorectal Surgeons Demonstrate Favorable Short-term Surgical Outcomes for Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: Assessment of a Japanese Nationwide Database

BACKGROUND

There are few studies on the impact of a colorectal-specific technically certified surgeon on good surgical outcomes for laparoscopic low anterior resection in the real world.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with the participation of a certified colorectal surgeon.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study using a Japanese nationwide database.

SETTING

This study was conducted as a project for the Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.

PATIENTS

This study included 41,741 patients listed in the National Clinical Database who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection performed by certified, noncertified, and colorectal-specific certified surgeons, according to the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System, from 2016 to 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Operative mortality rate and anastomotic leak rate were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall 30-day mortality and operative mortality were 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively, without significant differences between all kinds of certified and noncertified surgeon groups. Overall anastomotic leak rate was 9.3%, with a significant difference between the 2 groups. Colorectal- and stomach-certified groups had lower 30-day mortality and operative mortality than the biliary-certified and noncertified groups. The anastomotic leak rate was the lowest in the colorectal-certified group. Based on a logistic regression analysis using the risk-adjusted model, operative mortality was significantly higher in the biliary-certified group than in the colorectal-certified group. Moreover, anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower in the colorectal-certified group than in the stomach-certified and noncertified groups.

LIMITATIONS

This study was a retrospective study, and there was a possibility of different definitions of anastomotic leak due to the use of a nationwide database.

CONCLUSIONS

The participation of a colorectal-specific certified surgeon may decrease the risk of operative mortality and anastomotic leak for laparoscopic low anterior resection.

CIRUJANO COLORRECTAL ALTAMENTE CALIFICADO PROVOCA RESULTADOS QUIRRGICOS FAVORABLES A CORTO PLAZO PARA LA RESECCIN ANTERIOR BAJA LAPAROSCPICA EVALUACIN DE LA BASE DE DATOS NACIONAL JAPONESA

ANTECEDENTES:Hay pocos estudios sobre el impacto de un cirujano certificado técnicamente especializado en cáncer colorrectal con un buen resultado quirúrgico para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica en el mundo real.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los resultados a corto plazo de la resección anterior baja laparoscópica con la participación de un cirujano colorrectal certificado.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que utilizó una base de datos nacional japonesa.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó como un proyecto para la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Endoscópica y la Sociedad Japonesa de Cirugía Gastroenterológica.PACIENTES:este estudio incluyó a 41 741 pacientes incluidos en la base de datos clínica nacional que se sometieron a una resección anterior baja laparoscópica realizada por cirujanos certificados, no certificados y certificados específicamente colorrectales, según el Sistema de calificación de habilidades quirúrgicas endoscópicas de 2016 a 2018.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:La tasa de mortalidad operatoria y la tasa de fuga anastomótica fueron los resultados primarios.RESULTADOS:La mortalidad general a los 30 días y la mortalidad operatoria fueron del 0,2 % y el 0,3 %, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos de todos los tipos de cirujanos certificados y no certificados. La tasa global de fuga anastomótica fue del 9,3 %, con una diferencia significativa entre los dos grupos. Los grupos con certificación colorrectal y estomacal tuvieron una mortalidad a los 30 días y una mortalidad operatoria más bajas que los grupos con certificación biliar y sin certificación. La tasa de fuga anastomótica fue la más baja en el grupo certificado colorrectal. Con base en un análisis de regresión logística utilizando el modelo ajustado por riesgo, la mortalidad operatoria fue significativamente más alta en el grupo con certificación biliar que en el grupo con certificación colorrectal. Además, la tasa de fuga anastomótica fue significativamente más baja en el grupo con certificación colorrectal que en los grupos con certificación estomacal y sin certificación.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue retrospectivo y existía la posibilidad de diferentes definiciones de fuga anastomótica debido al uso de una base de datos nacional.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de un cirujano certificado en video específico colorrectal puede disminuir el riesgo de mortalidad operatoria y fuga anastomótica para la resección anterior baja laparoscópica. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

The Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health Outcomes Beyond the Intervention: A Methodological Review

Background

Previous research suggests that when a treatment is delivered, patients’ outcomes may vary systematically by medical practitioner.

Objective

To conduct a methodological review of studies reporting on the effect of doctors on patients’ physical health outcomes and to provide recommendations on how this effect could be measured and reported in a consistent and appropriate way.

Methods

The data source was 79 included studies and randomized controlled trials from a systematic review of doctors’ effects on patients’ physical health. We qualitatively assessed the studies and summarized how the doctors’ effect was measured and reported.

Results

The doctors’ effects on patients’ physical health outcomes were reported as fixed effects, identifying high and low outliers, or random effects, which estimate the variation in patient health outcomes due to the doctor after accounting for all available variables via the intra-class correlation coefficient. Multivariable multilevel regression is commonly used to adjust for patient risk, doctor experience and other demographics, and also to account for the clustering effect of hospitals in estimating both fixed and random effects.

Conclusion

This methodological review identified inconsistencies in how the doctor’s effect on patients’ physical health outcomes is measured and reported. For grading doctors from worst to best performances and estimating random effects, specific recommendations are given along with the specific data points to report.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/rvHjVIEPVhI

Is There a Surgeons’ Effect on Patients’ Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention, That Requires Further Investigation? A Systematic Review

Objective

To find and review published papers researching surgeons’ effects on patients’ physical health. Clinical outcomes of surgery patients with similar prognoses cannot be fully explained by surgeon skill or experience. Just as there are “hospital” and “psychotherapist” effects, there may be “surgeons” effects that persist after controlling for known variables like patient health and operation riskiness.

Methods

Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of any surgical intervention, which, after multivariate adjustment, either showed proportion of variance in patients’ physical health outcomes due to surgeons (random effects) or graded surgeons from best to worst (fixed effects). Studies with <15 surgeons or only ascribing surgeons’ effects to known variables excluded. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were used for search until June 2020. Manual search for papers referring/referred by resulting studies. Risk of bias assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Results

Included studies: 52 cohort studies and three RCTs of 52,436+ surgeons covering 102 outcomes (33 unique). Studies either graded surgeons from best to worst or calculated the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), the percentage of patients’ variation due to surgeons, in diverse ways. Sixteen studies showed exceptionally good and/or bad performers with confidence intervals wholly above or below the average performance. ICCs ranged from 0 to 47%, median 4.0%. There are no well-established reporting standards; highly heterogeneous reporting, therefore no meta-analysis.

Discussion

Interpretation: There is a surgeons' effect on patients’ physical health for many types of surgeries and outcomes, ranging from small to substantial. Surgeons with exceptional patient outcomes appear regularly even after accounting for all known confounding variables. Many existing cohort studies and RCTs could be reanalyzed for surgeons’ effects especially after methodological reporting guidelines are published.

Conclusion

In terms of patient outcomes, it can matter which surgeon is chosen. Surgeons with exceptional patient outcomes are worth studying further.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/pL-eGyAGhSk

Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit

PURPOSE

Centralization of cancer care is expected to yield superior results. In Germany, the national strategy is based on a voluntary certification process. The effect of centre certification is difficult to prove because quality data are rarely available prior to certification. This observational study aims to assess outcomes for rectal cancer patients before and after implementation of a certified cancer centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for rectal cancer in our certified centre from 2009 to 2017 were retrieved from a prospective database. The dataset was analyzed according to a predefined set of 19 quality indicators comprising 36 quality goals. The results were compared to an identical cohort of patients, treated from 2000 to 2008 just before centre implementation.

RESULTS

In total, 1059 patients were included, 481 in the 2009-2017 interval and 578 in the 2000-2008 interval. From 2009 to 2017, 25 of 36 quality goals were achieved (vs. 19/36). The proportion of anastomotic leaks in low anastomoses was improved (13.5% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.018), as was the local 5-year recurrence rate for stage (y)pIII rectal cancers (7.7% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.085), and quality of mesorectal excision (0.3% incomplete resections vs. 5.5%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, a decrease of abdominoperineal excisions was noted (47.1% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.037). For the 2009-2017 interval, local 5-year recurrence rate in stages (y)p0-III was 4.6% and 5-year overall survival was 80.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Certification as specialized centre and regular audits were associated with an improvement of various quality parameters. The formal certification process has the potential to enhance quality of care for rectal cancer patients.

Systematic review of cortical bone trajectory versus pedicle screw techniques for lumbosacral spine fusion

Fusion of the lumbosacral spine is a common surgical procedure to address a range of spinal pathologies. Fixation in lumbar fusion has traditionally been performed using pedicle screw (PS) augmentation. However, an alternative method of screw insertion via cortical bone trajectory (CBT) has been advocated as a less invasive approach which improves initial fixation and reduces neurovascular injury. There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence to support these claims, particularly in comparison to traditional pedicle screws. This study aims to review the available evidence to assess the merits of the CBT approach. Six electronic databases were searched for original published studies which compared CBT with traditional PS and their findings reviewed. Nine comparative studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search. Studies were classified as retrospective cohort, prospective cohort or case control studies with medium quality as assessed by the GRADE criteria. The available literature is not cohesive regarding outcomes and complications of CBT versus PT procedures. Most studies found no difference in operative time, but reported less blood loss during CBT. Radiological outcomes show no difference in slippage at one year although CBT is associated with greater bone-density compared to PT. Results for post-operative pain are inconclusive.

Californium-252 neutron intracavity brachytherapy alone for T1N0 low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma: A definitive anal sphincter-preserving radiotherapy

This study evaluated the 4-year results of 32 patients with T1N0 low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma treated solely with californium-252 (Cf-252) neutron intracavity brachytherapy (ICBT). Patients were solicited into the study from January 2008 to June 2011. All the patients had refused surgery or surgery was contraindicated. The patients were treated with Cf-252 neutron ICBT using a novel 3.5-cm diameter off-axis 4-channel intrarectal applicator designed by the authors. The dose reference point was defined on the mucosa surface, with a total dose of 55-62 Gy-eq/4 f (13-16 Gy-eq/f/wk). All the patients completed the radiotherapy in accordance with our protocol. The rectal lesions regressed completely, and the acute rectal toxicity was mild (≤G2). The 4-year local control, overall survival, disease-free survival, and late complication (≥G2) rates were 96.9%, 90.6%, 87.5% and 15.6%, respectively. No severe late complication (≥G3) occurred. The mean follow-up was 56.1 ± 16.0 months. At the end of last follow-up, 29 patients remained alive. The mean survival time was 82.1 ± 2.7 months. Cf-252 neutron ICBT administered as the sole treatment (without surgery) for patients with T1N0 low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma is effective with acceptable late complications. Our study and method offers a definitive anal sphincter-preserving radiotherapy for T1N0 low-lying rectal adenocarcinoma patients.

Determinants of recurrence after intended curative resection for colorectal cancer

Despite intended curative resection, colorectal cancer will recur in ∼45% of the patients. Results of meta-analyses conclude that frequent follow-up does not lead to early detection of recurrence, but improves overall survival. The present literature shows that several factors play important roles in development of recurrence. It is well established that emergency surgery is a major determinant of recurrence. Moreover, anastomotic leakages, postoperative bacterial infections, and blood transfusions increase the recurrence rates although the exact mechanisms still remain obscure. From pathology studies it has been shown that tumors behave differently depending on their location and recur more often when micrometastases are present in lymph nodes and around vessels and nerves. K-ras mutations, microsatellite instability, and mismatch repair genes have also been shown to be important in relation with recurrences, and tumors appear to have different mutations depending on their location. Patients with stage II or III disease are often treated with adjuvant chemotherapy despite the fact that the treatments are far from efficient among all patients, who are at risk of recurrence. Studies are now being presented identifying subgroups, in which the therapy is inefficient. Unfortunately, only few of these facts are implemented in the present follow-up programs. Therefore, further research is urgently needed to verify which of the well-known parameters as well as new parameters that must be added to the current follow-up programs to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis

BACKGROUND

In rectal surgery, some situations can be critical, such as anterior topography of locally advanced low tumors with a positive predictive radial margin, especially in a narrow pelvis of men who are obese. Transanal proctectomy is a new laparoscopic technique that uses the transanal endoscopic microsurgery device.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the technical feasibility of laparoscopic transanal proctectomy in patients with unfavorable features.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

This is a single-center, prospective analysis of selected patients with rectal cancer operated on from January 2009 to June 2011.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperative details and short-term postoperative outcome were described.

RESULTS

Thirty men with advanced or recurrent low rectal tumors associated with unfavorable anatomical and/or tumor characteristics underwent a sphincter-sparing transanal endoscopic proctectomy. Twenty-nine patients had received preoperative treatment. We report a 6% conversion rate, no postoperative mortality, and a 30% morbidity rate. At the beginning of our experience, a urethral injury was diagnosed in 2 patients and easily sutured intraoperatively, without postoperative after-effect. The mesorectal resection was graded as "good" in all patients. R0 resection was achieved in 26 patients (87%). The short-term stoma closure rate was 85%. After a median follow-up of 21 months, 4 patients experienced locoregional recurrence alone. Overall survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 96.6% (95% CI, 78.0-99.5) and 80.5% (95% CI, 53.0-92.9). Relapse-free survival rates at 12 and 24 months were 93.3% (95% CI, 75.9-98.3) and 88.9% (95% CI, 69.0-96.3).

LIMITATIONS

Although the transanal endoscopic proctectomy was performed by trained surgeons, we report a slight increase in early postoperative morbidity and relatively poor early outcome. There was a clear selection bias related to the study cohort exclusively composed of high-risk patients, but we need to be cautious before generalizing this technique.

CONCLUSION

The transanal endoscopic proctectomy is a feasible alternative surgical option to conventional laparoscopy for radical rectal resection in selected cases with unfavorable characteristics. Further investigations with larger cohorts are required to validate its safety and to clarify its best indication.

Volume and outcome in rectal cancer surgery: the importance of quality management

PURPOSE

For many years, the impact of the surgeon volume on short- and long-term outcome after rectal carcinoma surgery is controversially discussed. Literature and own department data were reviewed in order to clarify the impact of surgeon volume in the current era of total mesorectal excision surgery, multimodal therapy, quality management, and centralization of cancer care.

METHODS

Uni- and multivariate analysis of data from 1,028 patients with solitary rectal carcinoma, treated between 1995 and 2010 at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany, was performed. Surgeons were subdivided according to the number of operations/year into high- (at least seven/year), medium- (three to six), and low- (less than three) volume surgeons.

RESULTS

Of 1,028 patients, 800 (77.8 %) were operated by five high-volume surgeons, 193 (18.8 %) by seven medium-volume surgeons, and 35 (3.4 %) by 12 low-volume surgeons. Surgeon volume was significantly associated with postoperative mortality and the rate of positive pathological circumferential resection margin. In risk-adjusted analysis, after primary surgery, surgeon volume had a significant impact on observed overall survival and disease-free survival, but not on locoregional recurrence. After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, only observed overall survival was significantly influenced by surgeon volume.

CONCLUSIONS

In surgical departments with special interest in rectal carcinoma, surgeon volume has some influence on short- and long-term outcome. Irrespective of this fact, specialization, experience, individual skill, hospital organization, and regular quality assurance are essential prognostic factors ensuring good results in rectal carcinoma surgery.

Multimodal treatment strategies for locally advanced rectal cancer

This review outlines the important multimodal treatment issues associated with locally advanced rectal cancer. Changes to chemotherapy and radiation schema, as well as modern surgical approaches, have led to a revolution in the management of this disease but the morbidity and mortality remains high. Adequate treatment is dependent on precise preoperative staging modalities. Advances in staging via endorectal ultrasound, computed tomography, MRI and PET have improved pretreatment triage and management. Important prognostic factors and their impact for this disease are under investigation. Here we discuss the different treatment options including modern tumor-related surgical approaches, neoadjuvant as well as adjuvant therapies. Further clinical progress will largely depend on the broader implementation of multidisciplinary treatment strategies following the principles of evidence-based medicine.

Tracking intraoperative complications

BACKGROUND

Relatively little is known or understood about the nature of complications that occur during a surgical procedure. Definitions, classification, and documentation are substantive challenges to comprehensive event capture. We hypothesized that our prospective complication database (ie, Surgical Activity Tracking System) would supplement traditional sources of intraoperative complication reporting.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive patients undergoing surgery on a single general surgical service from June 2005 through May 2010 were selected for analysis. All cases had been entered into the Surgical Activity Tracking System, a prospective complication database that identifies and captures complications in real time, using a specially trained nurse practitioner. Intraoperative complications were grouped into 1 of 9 categories. Operative reports and discharge summaries were analyzed by an independent reviewer to determine if the complication(s) had been documented by a traditional data source.

RESULTS

Eight thousand eight hundred and ninety-six operations were performed on 7,729 patients during the study period. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (1.5%) experienced an intraoperative complication. Nonintestinal organ lacerations, inadvertent enterotomies, and hemorrhage were the most common adverse events. The operative reports failed to mention 20 of the 151 complications (13%), and discharge summaries failed to report 22 complications (14%). Some complications, such as inadvertent enterotomy, were almost always reported, but others such as arrhythmia, were only occasionally described (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective complication tracking system identified a considerable number of complications that were not available in either the operative report or discharge summary. The number of unreported adverse events varied greatly by category, suggesting opportunities for improvement in both complication identification and tracking.

Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

A large body of research has focused on investigating the effects of healthcare provider volume and specialization on patient outcomes including outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. However there is conflicting evidence about the role of such healthcare provider characteristics in the management of colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the available literature for the effects of hospital volume, surgeon caseload and specialization on the outcomes of colorectal, colon and rectal cancer surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and LILACS using free text search words (as well as MESH-terms). We also searched Medline (January 1990-September 2011), Embase (January 1990-September 2011) and registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Non-randomised and observational studies that compared outcomes for colorectal cancer, colon cancer and rectal cancer surgery (overall 5-year survival, five year disease specific survival, operative mortality, 5-year local recurrence rate, anastomotic leak rate, permanent stoma rate and abdominoperineal excision of the rectum rate) between high volume/specialist hospitals and surgeons and low volume/specialist hospitals and surgeons.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias in included studies. Results were pooled using the random effects model in unadjusted and case-mix adjusted meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall five year survival was significantly improved for patients with colorectal cancer treated in high-volume hospitals (HR=0.90, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.96), by high-volume surgeons (HR=0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) and colorectal specialists (HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.94). Operative mortality was significantly better for high-volume surgeons (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91) and specialists (OR=0.74, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.91), but there was no significant association with higher hospital caseload (OR=0.93, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.04) when only case-mix adjusted studies were included. There were differences in the effects of caseload depending on the level of case-mix adjustment and also whether the studies originated in the US or in other countries. For rectal cancer, there was a significant association between high-volume hospitals and improved 5-year survival (HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.93), but not with operative mortality (OR=0.97, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.33); surgeon caseload had no significant association with either 5-year survival (HR=0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.14) or operative mortality (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.19) when case-mix adjusted studies were reviewed. Higher hospital volume was associated with significantly lower rates of permanent stomas (OR=0.64, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.90) and APER (OR=0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.72). High-volume surgeons and specialists also achieved lower rates of permanent stoma formation (0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88) and (0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.94, respectively).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm clearly the presence of a volume-outcome relationship in colorectal cancer surgery, based on hospital and surgeon caseload, and specialisation. The volume-outcome relationship appears somewhat stronger for the individual surgeon than for the hospital; particularly for overall 5-year survival and operative mortality, there were differences between US and non-US data, suggesting provider variability at hospital level between different countries, making it imperative that every country or healthcare system must establish audit systems to guide changes in the service provision based on local data, and facilitate centralisation of services as required. Overall quality of the evidence was low as all included studies were observational by design. In addition there were discrepancies in the definitions of caseload and colorectal specialist. However ethical challenges associated with the conception of randomised controlled trials addressing the volume outcome relationship makes this the best available evidence.

Surgical specialization and training - its relation to clinical outcome for colorectal cancer surgery

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Surgical sub-specialization has been considered to be a major factor in improving cancer surgery-related outcomes in terms of 5-year survival and disease-free intervals. In this article we have looked at the evidence supporting the improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes with 'colorectal specialists' performing colon and rectal surgery.

METHODS

A literature review was carried out using search engines such as Pubmed, Ovid and Cochrane Databases. Only studies looking at colorectal cancer outcome related to surgery were included in our review.

RESULTS

Specialist surgeons performing a high volume of colorectal cancer surgery demonstrated better 5-year survival rates in patients, with less local recurrence. This was most evident in surgery for rectal cancer, where an association with increased sphincter saving surgery was also seen. Total mesorectal excision is now the accepted treatment for rectal cancer and has markedly improved survival rates and decreased local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes in colorectal surgery continue to steadily improve. The training of specialized colorectal surgeons is a major contributing factor towards this improvement.

Prognostic heterogeneity of endosonographic T3 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the prognostic implications of uT3 rectal carcinomas according to the tumor thickness and to analyze the correlation between this ultrasound-based parameter and other prognostic factors.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with uT3(pM0) rectal tumors underwent primary surgery from 1996 to 2003. Preoperative endorectal ultrasound was used to assess uN stage, maximum tumor perimeter, and maximum tumor thickness. An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness cutoff point for local recurrence subdividing T3 tumors into uT3a and uT3b was established.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 41 months (range, 24-59). The 5-year actuarial local and overall recurrence rates were 9.82 percent (n = 7) and 42.46 percent (n = 23), respectively. uN stage(P = 0.05), circumferential resection margin involvement (P = 0.002), an ultrasound maximum tumor thickness (P = 0.01), and locally advanced tumors (P = 0.001) were related to a significantly increased risk of local recurrence. An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0-1.2) and locally advanced tumor (hazard ratio, 17.21; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.99-98.84) were preoperative independent variables for predicting local recurrence. Locally advanced tumor was the only preoperative independent prognostic factor for overall recurrence (P = 0.004; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0-1.1). An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness with a 19-mm cutoff point, subdividing the T3 tumors into uT3a and uT3b, can be used to predict local recurrence. Locally advanced tumors (P = 0.02) and circumferential resection margin involvement (P = 0.005) showed a significant association with an ultrasound maximum tumor thickness >19 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

A maximum tumor thickness measured by endorectal ultrasound in pT3 rectal cancer is an independent prognostic factor for local and overall recurrence. An ultrasound maximum tumor thickness cutoff point of 19 mm may be useful to classify patients preoperatively and to select them for primary surgery or neoadjuvant therapy.

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Detailed preoperative staging using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables the selection of patients that require preoperative therapy for tumour regression. This information can be used to instigate neoadjuvant therapy in those patients with poor prognostic features prior to disturbing the tumour bed and potentially disseminating disease. The design of trials incorporating MR assessment of prognostic factors prior to therapy has been found to be of value in assessing treatment modalities and outcomes that are targeted to these preoperative prognostic subgroups and in providing a quantifiable assessment of the efficacy of particular chemoradiation treatment protocols by comparing pre-treatment MR staging with post therapy histology assessment. At present, we are focused on achieving clear surgical margins of excision (CRM) to avoid local recurrence. We recommend that all patients with rectal cancer should undergo pre-operative MRI staging. Of these, about half will have good prognosis features (T1-T3b, N0, EMVI negative, CRM clear) and may safely undergo primary total mesorectal excision. Of the remainder, those with threatened or involved margins will certainly benefit from pre-operative chemoradiotherapy with the aim of downstaging to permit safe surgical excision. In the future, our ability to recognise features predicting distant failure, such as extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) may be used to stratify patients for neo-adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in an effort to prevent distant relapse. The optimal pre-operative treatment regimes for these patients (radiotherapy alone, systemic chemotherapy alone or combination chemo-radiotherapy) is the subject of current and future trials.

No influence of surgical volume on patients' health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

Studies on factors that can counteract the negative impact of esophagectomy on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) have been sparse. This study was undertaken to examine the question whether hospital or surgeon volume influences HRQL as evaluated 6 months after such surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Swedish prospective, population-based cohort study of esophageal cancer patients treated surgically in 2001-2005 was conducted. All patients completed validated HRQL questionnaires, developed by EORTC, addressing general HRQL (QLQ-C30) and esophageal-specific symptoms (QLQ-OES18), 6 months postoperatively. Mean scores with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Clinically relevant mean score differences (>/=10) between groups were further analyzed in a linear regression model, adjusted for several potential confounders.

RESULTS

Some 355 patients were included (80% of eligible). No clinically relevant differences were found between low-volume (0-9 operations/year) and high-volume hospitals (>9 operations/year) or between low-volume (0-6 operations/year) and high-volume surgeons (>6 operations/year). Stratified analyses for tumor location did not reveal any differences between hospital or surgeon volume groups. Moreover, no material differences were found between the four individual high-volume hospitals.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed no HRQL advantages of being treated at high-volume hospitals or by high-volume surgeons, as measured 6 months after esophageal cancer resection.

Surgical treatment of rectal cancer: results of a strategy for selective preoperative radiotherapy

AIM

The indications for preoperative adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer are still a subject of debate. The objective of this study was to analyze the results of surgical resection and selective radiotherapy in a group of high-risk patients (Dukes B and C) taken from a series of 148 consecutive patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

All patients with rectal cancer considered for resection during the period 1994-2004 were prospectively included. The policy was to deliver preoperative radiotherapy in cases of fixed or tethered tumors or when imaging predicted T3 tumors with positive circumferential margins. Other tumors were resected without neoadjuvant therapy. All resections were done using the total mesorectal excision (TME) technique.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-eight consecutive patients underwent rectal resection during the study period. A sphincter-saving technique was carried out in 134 patients (90%). No patient was excluded from the analysis. The perioperative mortality was 2/148 (1.5%). Curative surgery was obtained in 135 patients. The 94 patients with a Dukes B or C tumor formed the high-risk group that was the basis of our study. The mean follow-up in this group was 58 months (range 24-120). Twenty patients (21%) received preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) and 74 (79%) underwent surgical resection alone. A positive circumferential margin, defined as one that was < or =1 mm, was found in seven of the 85 patients (8.2%) for whom this measure was available. The actuarial five-year overall survival was 74%. Local recurrence developed in eight patients (8.4%): four in the PRT group (20%), and four in the non-PRT group (5.4%). Only two patients developed an isolated local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative adjuvant therapy can be safely omitted in patients who demonstrate clear circumferential margins on preoperative imaging, provided that adequate surgery is subsequently performed.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation or radiotherapy in rectal cancer--a review focusing on open questions

BACKGROUND

The therapy of rectal cancer has been a matter of debate since decades, especially with regard to the benefits of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. Principles of additional therapies have been established nearly two decades ago and are questioned nowadays on the basis of more recently modified operative techniques. Benefits and sequelae of therapies have to be balanced against each other, and it seems somewhat likely that a more differentiated strategy than simply stating that every patient with stage II and III rectal cancer needs chemoradiation or radiotherapy will, in long term, be recommended.

CONCLUSION

It should be kept in mind that results of centers of excellence and of phase-III studies with their positively selected patient populations are not representative for all the patients with rectal cancer and physicians treating them.

Effect of anastomosis level on continence performance and quality of life after colonic J-pouch reconstruction

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has become the recommended method for treatment of cancer in the middle or lower third of the rectum. Thus very low anastomoses are necessary to preserve continence, and pouch reconstruction is favored. It is unclear whether the level of anastomosis is important for continence and quality of life in colonic J-pouch reconstruction. In this investigation all patients were included who underwent curative elective anterior continuity resection with colorectal or coloanal J-pouch reconstruction for primary rectal cancer between January 2001 and December 2004. Exclusion criteria were distant metastases and any signs of recurrence at the time of investigation. Evaluation of continence performance by Wexner and Holschneider questionnaire and quality of life using the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 (EORTC) questionnaires was done 220 +/- 38 days after closure of the protective Ileostomy, which was performed 106 +/- 48 days after primary intervention. Fifty-two patients (79%) were analyzed. Colopouch rectal anastomosis was performed in eighteen cases and colopouch anal anastomosis in thirty-four cases. Fifty percent of the patients in both groups were continent for solid stool. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly higher rate of incontinence for liquid stool, however. They took stool-regulating medicine more frequently and complained of fecal soiling and a restricted quality of life. Patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis had a significantly lower score on the most important points of the QLQ-C30 (emotional functioning, social functioning, pain, and quality of life). The same applied to the QLQ-CR38 for body image and problems with defecation. The quality of life of patients with a colopouch anal anastomosis was still considered acceptable compared with reference data for the normal healthy population, however. Both continence and quality of life are substantially affected by the level of the anastomosis after colonic pouch reconstruction. This suggests preservation of a small part of the rectum when oncologically feasible and performing a colopouch rectal anastomosis.

Rectal cancer delivery of radiotherapy in adequate time and with adequate dose is influenced by treatment center, treatment schedule, and gender and is prognostic parameter for local control: Results of study CAO/ARO/AIO-94

PURPOSE

The impact of the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) on treatment results in rectal cancer patients is unknown.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data from 788 patients with rectal cancer treated within the German CAO/AIO/ARO-94 phase III trial were analyzed concerning the impact of the delivery of RT (adequate RT: minimal radiation RT dose delivered, 4300 cGy for neoadjuvant RT or 4700 cGy for adjuvant RT; completion of RT in <44 days for neoadjuvant RT or <49 days for adjuvant RT) in different centers on the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years. The LRR, DFS, and delivery of RT were analyzed as endpoints in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the centers and the delivery of RT. The overall delivery of RT was a prognostic factor for the LRR (no RT, 29.6% +/- 7.8%; inadequate RT, 21.2% +/- 5.6%; adequate RT, 6.8% +/- 1.4%; p = 0.0001) and DFS (no RT, 55.1% +/- 9.1%; inadequate RT, 57.4% +/- 6.3%; adequate RT, 69.1% +/- 2.3%; p = 0.02). Postoperatively, delivery of RT was a prognostic factor for LRR on multivariate analysis (together with pathologic stage) but not for DFS (independent parameters, pathologic stage and age). Preoperatively, on multivariate analysis, pathologic stage, but not delivery of RT, was an independent prognostic parameter for LRR and DFS (together with adequate chemotherapy). On multivariate analysis, the treatment center, treatment schedule (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant RT), and gender were prognostic parameters for adequate RT.

CONCLUSION

Delivery of RT should be regarded as a prognostic factor for LRR in rectal cancer and is influenced by the treatment center, treatment schedule, and patient gender.

Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinases in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic role of matrix metalloproteinases in rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections of 94 rectal carcinomas were used for the immunohistochemical analysis of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2, MMP-7, MT1-MMP, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-2. Inclusion criteria were sporadic rectal adenocarcinoma resected curatively (including total mesorectal excision), adjuvant radiochemotherapy in UICC stages II and III, and complete intra-institutional follow-up. Results of immunohistochemistry were correlated with clinical and histopathologic data from the prospective rectal cancer registry and prognosis. End points of the prognostic analysis were tumor progression caused by local and/or distant recurrence and 5-year survival (disease-free and overall). To assess prognostic significance, statistics included univariate and multivariate analysis (p<0.05 statistically significant).

RESULTS

Of the 94 rectal carcinomas, 35% (33/94) showed an epithelial MMP-2 expression, 77% (72/94) were MMP-2 positive in the stroma. Fifty-four percent (51/94) were MMP-7 positive, and 47% (46/94) were positive for both MT1-MMP and TIMP-2. The stromal MMP-2 staining pattern was correlated with the depth of invasion (pT status, p=0.006) with MMP-7 (p=0.016) and TIMP-2 expression (p=0.036). Positive expression of MMP-2 in tumor epithelium was correlated with MMP-7 (p=0.027), MT1-MMP (p=0.036), and TIMP-2 expression (p<0.0001). A positive staining pattern of MMP-7 was significantly correlated with depth of invasion and TIMP-2 (p<0.01). The positive staining pattern of MT1-MMP was correlated with epithelial MMP-2 (p=0.036), MMP-7 (p=0.004), and TIMP-2 expression (p=0.002). TIMP-2 immunoreactivity correlated with depth of invasion (p=0.013), epithelial MMP-2 (p<0.001), stromal MMP-2 (p=0.036), MMP-7 (p<0.001), and MT1-MMP (p=0.002). Neither pattern correlated with age, gender, tumor stage (UICC), grading, preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, or nodal status (p>0.05). Within a mean follow-up of 46 months, tumor progression, caused by either local recurrence or distant metastasis, occurred in 14 patients (15.4%). There was no significant association between the MMP expression and the incidence of local and/or distant recurrence. In terms of survival, preoperative CEA level (disease-free 5-year survival 46% with increased CEA vs 70% with normal CEA, p=0.01; overall 5-year survival 43 vs 74%, p<0.01) and UICC stage were the only factors to be significantly related to 5-year survival by univariate analysis, whereas the metalloproteinases failed to show a significant association. In multivariate analysis, CEA and UICC stage were not identified as independent factors predictive of survival.

CONCLUSION

MMP-2, MMP-7, MT1-MMP, and TIMP-2 do not appear to be significant predictors of prognosis in a homogenous collective of curatively resected rectal adenocarcinomas.

Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed recent literature to assess the impact of hospital caseload, surgeon's caseload and education on long-term outcome following colorectal cancer surgery.

METHOD

We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases for relevant literature starting from 1992. We selected hospital caseload, surgeon's caseload and surgeon's education, type of hospital, and surgeon's experience as variables of interest. Measures of outcome were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, and for rectal cancer frequency of permanent stoma. We reviewed the 34 studies according to tumour location: colonic cancer, rectal cancer, or colorectal cancer. We described the studies individually and performed a meta-analysis whenever it was considered appropriate.

RESULTS

For colonic cancer, overall survival improved with increasing hospital caseload, odds ratio (OR) 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.28], and surgeon's education. For rectal cancer, overall survival improved with increasing hospital caseload, OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.19-1.60), and, possibly by surgeon' education and experience. Cancer-free survival was strongly influenced by surgeon's education. The colostomy rate was less in high caseload hospitals, OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.85). For colorectal cancer, overall survival improved with surgeon's education.

CONCLUSION

The data have provided evidence that long-term survival following colorectal cancer surgery in general improved significantly with increasing hospital caseload and surgeon's education.

Subspecialisation and its effect on the management of rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

To assess the impact of subspecialisation on surgical and oncological outcomes after rectal cancer surgery in a single surgical unit within a district general hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 207 patients with rectal cancer treated surgically by two colorectal surgeons and four experienced general surgeons at the Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, England between January 1995 and December 1999 were studied. A retrospective case-note review of each patient's personal details, operative and histological findings, their subsequent clinical progress and oncological outcomes, including 5-year survival were recorded.

RESULTS

In the study group, 127 patients were treated by a colorectal surgeon and 80 by general surgeons. Pre-operative radiotherapy was more likely to be given to patients treated by a colorectal surgeon. Fewer permanent stomas were performed by colorectal surgeons. Postoperative morbidity, transfusion requirements, anastomotic leak rates and 30-day mortality were not significantly different. Tumour-involved circumferential resection margins, local recurrence rates and risk of distant metastases were similar between the two groups of surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal subspecialisation has resulted in an increased use of pre-operative radiotherapy and fewer permanent stomas. No significant improvement in surgical or oncological outcomes after rectal cancer surgery have been observed.

Negative influence of delayed surgery on survival after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

In Europe, until recently the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer was preoperative radiotherapy (RT). The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence on survival of intervals between diagnosis and treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The influence on survival of intervals between diagnosis and surgery (Dg-Surg), diagnosis and initiation of RT (Dg-Rad), and completion of RT and surgery (Rad-Surg) was evaluated in a retrospective series of patients treated with preoperative RT. Between 1991 and 1998, 102 patients received treatment with preoperative RT without concomitant chemotherapy at the René Gauducheau Cancer Center. Patients generally received 45 Gy (80%) in 25 fractions over 35 days for T2-T3-T4 N0-N1 M0 rectal adenocarcinoma located mainly (62.7%) in the lower third of the rectum (< or = 5 cm from anal margin). Thirty-five pN1 patients were treated with postoperative chemotherapy. Differences between survival were assessed by the log-rank test, and prognostic factors by the Cox test.

RESULTS

Median time was 14.7 weeks for Dg-Surg, 4.6 weeks for Dg-Rad and 5.1 weeks for Rad-Surg. Median follow-up from diagnosis was 57.4 months. Five-year local relapse-free survival was 83.9%, metastasis-free survival 64% and overall survival 60.8%. No factor was predictive of tumour response to RT. Log-rank and multivariate analysis showed that overall survival was significantly influenced by lower-third tumours, pT, pN and Dg-Surg (poorer survival when > or = 16 weeks: OR = 2.59, P = 0.005). Metastasis-free survival correlated significantly with Dg-Surg (> or = 16 weeks: OR = 2.05, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

An interval of more than 16 weeks between diagnosis and surgery may reduce overall survival of patients treated with preoperative RT for locally advanced rectal cancer. Surgery should be performed shortly after completion of RT for patients with no possibility of sphincter preservation, or a minimal risk of morbidity from an abdominoperineal excision.

Influence of hospital volume on local recurrence and survival in a population sample of rectal cancer patients

AIMS

To investigate the role of hospital volume and individual hospitals on long term outcomes (local recurrence and survival) of rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

One thousand thirty-eight patients with rectal cancer were diagnosed between 1996 and 1998. From these, we analysed 884 patients with a resected invasive primary rectal cancer. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. The impact of hospital volume (<10, 10-30 and >30 rectal cancer patients annually) on local recurrence and survival was examined in a Cox model. Differences between the four largest clinics in the high volume group were also investigated.

RESULTS

In the multivariate model predicting survival the following variables were significant: UICC stage, grade, age, local recurrence, and (neo-) adjuvant therapy treatment. In the multivariate model predicting local recurrence UICC stage, tumour localisation, and neoadjuvant therapy treatment were significant variables. Hospital volume was not a significant factor for survival or local recurrence. Within the high volume category one hospital showed significantly worse local recurrence rates than all other hospitals, but no survival difference could be seen between the four largest hospitals of the high volume group.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of a rectal cancer population found that hospital volume did not determine survival or local recurrence. Detailed clinical data with long term follow-up from cancer registries are vital to demonstrate the quality of routine care.

Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer

The present scarcity of literature on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery makes it premature to determine whether laparoscopic surgery should be the standard of care for rectal cancer. Notwithstanding that, the available evidence proves its safety and adequate oncological clearance. Moreover, current data do not suggest any detrimental effect on the postoperative and early oncological outcomes. On the contrary, there is level three evidence showing that laparoscopic technique results in less blood loss, shorter length of stay, and reduced abdominal wound disorders and pulmonary complications, albeit the overall morbidity remains similar to that of open surgery. Long-term survival outcomes remain largely unclear, however. Hence, it is high time that laparoscopic technique should be further evaluated, preferably by means of large-scale randomized trials, to define its exact role in the treatment of rectal cancer.

Hospital volume and outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark 1994-99

OBJECTIVE

The association between hospital volumen and outcome of major cancer surgery is being debated at present. We analysed the outcome of rectal cancer surgery in Denmark during the period 1994-99.

METHODS

All patients with a first-time rectal cancer were registered in a national database during the 5-year period. In this observational cohort study, the influence of hospital case volume on resectional procedure, complications, 30-day mortality and 5-year mortality was analysed.

RESULTS

The register comprised 5021 patients. Surgery was performed in 27 hospitals with <15 operations per year, 15 hospitals with 15-30 operations per year and 11 hospitals with >30 operations per year. In a multivariate model, the risk of permanent colostomy was significantly increased in the group of low-volume hospitals. On the contrary, volume did not influence the risk of anastomotic leakage, 30-day mortality and 5-year mortality. However, a large variation in 5-year mortality was observed particularly within the low-volume group of hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, only risk of having a permanent colostomy during surgery for rectal cancer was significantly related to hospital case volume. When individual hospitals were analysed, a large variation in 5-year mortality was observed within the low-volume group of hospitals.

Survival after surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rectal carcinoma is one of the most prevalent tumour types. Prognostic factors are of special interest to estimate prognosis of the individual patient.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The data of 1,067 consecutive patients with solitary invasive rectal carcinoma, resected between 1988 and 1999 at the Department of Surgery of the University of Erlangen, were analysed. Cancer-related survival rate was calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis with respect to all relevant proven and probable prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The R classification was found to be the parameter with the greatest influence on survival of patients with rectal carcinoma. Other tumour-related prognostic factors that influenced prognosis significantly were the anatomical extent, described by the TNM classification of the UICC, tumour grade and extramural venous invasion (EVI). In addition, the operating surgeon, a therapy-related factor, and the preoperative serum CEA level were found to influence prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Tumour-related prognostic factors have the greatest influence on clinical decisions with regard to choice of a therapeutic concept. The increasing survival rates after treatment of rectal carcinoma have led to a focus on postoperative quality of life. Postoperative long-term global quality of life is similar to the preoperative level. Oncological outcome is still the most important factor, and tumour recurrence leads to a strong impairment of quality of life.

Sphincter-saving surgery for low rectal cancer. The experience of the National Cancer Institute, Milano

The treatment of tumors of the distal rectum continues to be a matter of great controversy among oncologic surgeons. There are increasingly promising indications that functionally conservative surgery may be a valid therapeutic alternative to conventional therapy in patients with tumours of the lower rectum, traditionally treated by abdomino-perineal resection and definitive colostomy. Many points are presently under evaluation and we want to discuss some of the most relevant topics that are now permitting to change the guide lines of therapy of this disease. Our view of the problem is based on a personal experience cumulated in fourteen years of activity in a specialized unit and this paper reports the main results of a complex and diversified study carried out during this period at the National Cancer Institute of Milan.

[Locally recurrent rectal carcinoma]

There is no doubt that surgical treatment with curative intent is warranted in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer. This is also true for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Operative procedures are demanding but may be curative if complete excision can be achieved. Preoperative radiochemotherapy has helped to improve resectability, but operative morbidity is still high. Procedure-related mortality on the other hand is low, at around 3%, and 25% 5-year survival can be expected after complete excision.

Treatment of T1–T2 rectal tumors by contact therapy and interstitial brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We retrospectively analysed our experience of contact therapy alone and/or combined with interstitial brachytherapy as exclusive treatment of low lying rectal tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1971 to 2001, 124 patients (103 adenocarcinomas, 21 villous tumours) were treated by contact therapy alone or combined with interstitial brachytherapy. All patients were staged according to the Dijon classification. The average size of the lesions was 2.4 cm (max 7 cm), clinical aspect was polypoïd in 75% of the cases, flat in 17%. Sixty four patients received contact therapy in three fractions and 44 patients received four fractions, for an average delivered dose of 95 Gy. Interstitial brachytherapy boost delivered 24 Gy on a reference isodose of 55 cGy/h in 10 patients.

RESULTS

The local control was 83% for T1 and 38% for T2 tumours (p=0.004). For mobile tumours, the local control rate is 76%, significantly higher than for tumours with impaired mobility (55%, P=0.03). Thirty-nine patients experienced a local failure (31%). For patients amenable to surgery, a Miles procedure was performed in 25 patients. Ultimate local control rate is 93% for T1, 69% for T2 (P<0.05), 15 patients failed despite treatment for local recurrence (15%). No significant differences were observed in a comparison of adenocarcinoma and villous tumours according to initial and ultimate local control. The mean disease free survival rate for the whole population is 66 months. The 5-year disease free survival for T1a and T1b is, respectively, 82 and 78%, 40 and 25% for T2a and T2b, respectively. The overall 5-year survival for the whole group is 62.4%. At the end of the treatment, 75% of the patients described a very good sphincter function. No deleterious effect on continence was reported during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The control rate for T1 rectal cancer treated with contact therapy with or without brachytherapy is comparable to surgical series. The sphincter was preserved in 80% of the patients. Radiotherapy remains an efficient and cheap alternative to surgery, mainly for old and fragile patients, or refusing colostomy. The results of these approaches for tumors larger than 3 cm (T2) are not satisfactory. For patients not amenable to surgery, external beam radiation therapy and/or combined modality with chemoradiation should be discussed to increase the loco-regional control rate. A careful selection of patients based on rectal examination and trans-rectal ultrasound could select more accurately patients amenable to such an approach.

Sphincter saving rectum resection is the standard procedure for low rectal cancer

AIM

To determine the procedure of choice for rectal cancer, particularly low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Complete search, according to evidence-based methods, of comparative studies and national surveys published in English since 1990.

SELECTION CRITERIA

comparative studies between abdominoperineal excision (APER) and sphincter-saving operations (SSO) with a minimum of 50 patients presenting cancer in the lower one-third of the rectum, perfect split of cases with cancer located in the lower, middle or upper one-thirds of the rectum, specified numbers of patients treated by surgery alone or combined with radio-chemotherapy, specified length of follow-up with a minimum of 1 year, univariate or multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Thirty-four studies fulfilling evidence level C were analyzed, including 6,570 patients.

ENDPOINTS

operative risk, local disease control, disease free or cancer specific survival and quality of life.

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity after APER and SSO is comparable and postoperative mortality decreased to 2% or less. The type of surgery was not identified as a prognostic factor in terms of local disease control and survival. Quality of life is significantly inferior after APER. National data reveal an APER rate for cancer of the whole rectum (up to 16 cm) at 50% or above, and SSO still would represent only 32% of the radical resections for low rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

All available evidence indicates that SSO should be the procedure of choice for rectal cancer, even in the lower one-third. An APER should only be performed when cancer invades the anal sphincters and negative resection margins cannot be achieved by a SSO.

Proteomic prediction of disease outcome in cancer : clinical framework and current status

Better than gene sequencing or quantitative amplification, proteomics tools allow the study of tumor phenotype. Indeed, most current prognostic tests in cancer (carcinoembryonary antigen [CEA], prostate-specific antigen [PSA], CA 19-1, CA 125, alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], etc.) are based on the detection and quantification of single proteins in body fluids. However, a common characteristic of these tests is their relatively low predictive value, so that they are usually complemented with other procedures such as biopsy and/or endoscopy. Recently, improved analytical and bioinformatics tools have driven the attention on pattern recognition approaches rather then single-marker tests for prognostic forecasting. It is expected that predicting metastasization on the basis of tumoral protein patterns will soon be a reality. However, currently available technologies either limit the number of proteins that can be analyzed simultaneously or they are expensive, difficult, and time-consuming. Moreover, the tools adapted for expression proteomics might not be the same as those for prognostic studies that require investigation of protein function over time. We believe that clinical proteomics research designed within a precise clinical and pathology framework should be strongly supported, since many prognostic factors are determined not by the tumor itself, but by the patient, the treatment and the environment.

The role of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Total mesorectal excision (TME) was described 20 years ago and is now being established as the therapeutic gold standard for middle and lower third rectal cancers in a number of countries worldwide.

METHODS

The authors reviewed published data regarding TME since its first description in 1982. Emphasis was placed on basic principles, achievable recurrence rates, evidence for use of adjunctive strategies, and the potential of TME.

RESULTS

Local recurrence rates following TME approximate 6.6% from published series, accounting for more than 5,000 patients. The available evidence for TME is largely composed of retrospective series, although benefits of TME compare favorably to established conventional controls. Recent studies have clarified the benefit of adjunctive radiotherapy with TME. There is considerable scope for development of TME within the minimal access setting, providing first principles are observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite initial controversy, TME is now a feasible, reproducible, adjunctive surgical therapy in the management of rectal cancer.

Anal sphincter preservation in locally advanced low rectal adenocarcinoma after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Standard treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma located 3-6 cm above anal verge is abdominoperineal resection. The objective was to evaluate feasibility, morbidity, and functional results of anal sphincter preservation after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 3 and 6 cm above the anal verge.

METHODS

This study included 17 males and 15 females with a mean age of 54.8 +/- 15.4 years. Tumors were located at a mean of 4.7 +/- 1.1 cm above the anal verge. The mean tumor size was 4.6 +/- 1.5 cm. All patients received the scheduled treatment. Twenty-two patients underwent coloanal anastomosis with the J pouch; 10 underwent straight anastomosis. Average surgical time was 328.7 +/- 43.8 min, and the average intraoperative hemorrhage was 471.5 +/- 363.6 ml. The mean distal surgical margin was 1.3 +/- 0.6 cm. Five patients (15.6%) received a blood transfusion.

RESULTS

Major complications included coloanal anastomotic leakage (three); pelvic abscess (three), and coloanal stenosis (two). Tumor stages were as follows: T0-2,N0,M0 = 12; T3,N0,M0 = 9; T1-3,N+,M0 = 9, and T1-3,N0-3,M+ = 2. Diverting stomas were closed in 30 patients. Median follow-up was 25 months. Recurrences occurred in four patients and were local and distant (n = 1) and distant (n = 3). Anal sphincter function was perfect (n = 20), incontinent to gas (n = 3), occasional minor leak (n = 2), frequent major soiling (n = 3), and colostomy (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer located 3-6 cm from anal verge who are traditionally treated with abdominoperineal resection, preservation of anal sphincter after preoperative chemoradiation therapy plus complete rectal excision with coloanal anastomosis is feasible and is associated with acceptable morbidity and no mortality.

The importance of quality assurance in surgical oncology

AIMS

The aims were to review the existing methods of quality assurance in surgical oncology and to determine a relationship between surgery-related factors and the variety in outcomes in the treatment of solid cancers.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed by searching Medline and Cancerlit databases.

RESULTS

Wide variations were found in virtually all tumour types. Clear evidence was found that an improvement in the quality of the surgical procedure could have major implications for the prognosis and quality of life of cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the need for strict quality control procedures in surgical oncology and might imply a considerable change in cancer treatment strategies, because the routine use of adjuvant therapies could be questioned.

[Relation between activity volume and surgeon's results: myth or reality?]

The relationship between volume and surgical outcome seems logical, but needs to be demonstrated in the real world. A qualitative systematic review has been conducted to verify this hypothesis. Five systematic reviews and hundred original papers have been retrieved and analysed. Most of the studies were retrospective and used administrative data instead of medical charts. Moreover few studies involved a good case mix adjustment when comparing surgical units or individual surgeons. These methodological flaws do not allow any evidence based conclusions. Even though a positive relationship is suggested for surgical units, the relationship between volume and outcome was however less obvious for an individual surgeon. There is some evidence that the relationship varied greatly according to the specialty or the procedure evaluated. A new approach based on predictive scores comparing expected versus observed outcomes is mandatory and seems to be the best way to assess objectively the relationship between surgical volume and outcomes.

Preoperative radiotherapy improves survival for patients undergoing total mesorectal excision for stage T3 low rectal cancers

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) on patients who undergo rectal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) for stage T3 low rectal cancers.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Evidence for the value of PRT before rectal cancer surgery is weakened by variability in the use of TME. Many surgeons have concluded that PRT is unnecessary for small rectal tumors if TME is performed, but there are no prospective data to support this opinion.

METHODS

Since 1980, 2,200 patients with rectal cancer have been enrolled in a prospective database. Of these, 259 underwent curative anterior or abdominoperineal resection with TME for pathologically confirmed T3 lesions within 8 cm of the anal verge. Patients were grouped by receiving PRT (n = 92) or not receiving PRT (n = 167). Five-year overall survival and 5-year local recurrence rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall survival was increased from 52% in patients not receiving PRT to 63% in those receiving PRT. PRT increased overall survival for node-negative patients from 58% to 82%, with no benefit for node-positive patients. There was no significant difference in local recurrence rates. When categorized by tumor size, there was no difference in overall survival or local recurrence for 0- to 2-cm tumors or those larger than 5 cm, but PRT increased overall survival from 50% to 72% for patients with 2- to 5-cm tumors. Similar results were observed for patients with tumors staged as T3 on preoperative endoluminal ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pT3 low rectal cancers undergoing resection with TME have an improved survival with PRT. The effect is most beneficial for patients with node-negative and 2- to 5-cm tumors, although this group may include larger and node-positive tumors that have been downstaged by PRT. PRT should be advocated for all patients with T3 rectal cancers less than 8 cm from the anal verge, even if the surgery includes a properly performed TME.

Surgical palliation in advanced disease: recent developments

Despite many valuable technical innovations for the relief of suffering in advanced disease over the past few years, only recently have surgical oncologists attempted to more clearly define palliation. Previous definitions have been misleading, creating confusion about the merits of surgery in many situations and difficulty in posing questions for future prospective clinical trials. This report outlines recent progress in identifying and refining a philosophy of palliative surgery that would align it with the consensus of nonsurgical opinion summarized by the 1990 World Health Organization definition of palliative care and the emerging consensus among the medical specialties in the United States concerning principles of care at the end of life. Selected controversies and recent innovations, as well as guidelines for palliative surgery, are discussed.

Survival from colorectal cancer in Victoria: 10-year follow up of the 1987 management survey

BACKGROUND

In 1987, the Victorian Cancer Registry identified a population-based sample of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer for an audit of management following resection. Over 10 years have passed since this survey, and data on the survival of these patients (incorporating various prognostic indicators collected at the time of the survey) are now discussed in the present report.

METHODS

Relative survival analysis was conducted for each prognostic indicator separately and then combined in a multivariate model.

RESULTS

Relative survival at 5 years for patients undergoing curative resections was 76% compared with 7% for those whose treatment was considered palliative. Survival at 10 years was little changed (73% and 7% respectively). Survival did not differ significantly by sex or age irrespective of treatment intention. In the curative group, only stage was a significant predictor of survival. Multivariate analysis was performed only for the curative group. Adjusting for all variables simultaneously,stage was the only -significant predictor of survival. Patients with Dukes' stage C disease were at a significantly greater risk (OR 5.5 (1.7-17.6)) than those with Dukes' A. Neither tumour site, sex, age, surgeon activity level nor adjuvant therapies made a significant contribution to the model.