Familial adenomatous polyposis: efficacy of endoscopic and surgical treatment for advanced duodenal adenomas

Early Discovery Of Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma In a Patient Admitted For 4 Acute Intestinal Intussusception case report

Introduction

Malignant tumours of the small bowel are uncommon in clinical practice. Adenocarcinoma is the most common of these tumours, accounting for approximately 35–45% of all tumours. It may occur sporadically, in association with familial adenomatous polyposis coli or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, or in association with chronic inflammatory bowel changes (such as Crohn's disease or celiac disease).

Materials and methods

We report a case of Early Discovery Of Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma In A Patient Admitted For 4 Acute Intestinal Intussusception in the department of Emergency visceral surgery P35 of the ibn rochd hospital in casablanca.

Results

Our patient was admitted to the emergency room for sub-occlusive syndrome with generalized abdominal pain of chronic appearance dating back to one month before his admission With Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound showed: intestinal parietal thickening and minimal ascites (peritoneal and/or intestinal tuberculosis? Crohn's disease)

The patient underwent an abdominal-pelvic CT scan which showed: Presence of diffuse small bowel thickening, involving several small intestines and the colonic angle with intestinal invaginations (at least 3) suspecting an inflammatory or tumoral origin? To be compared with histological data and infiltration of the mesenteric fat in the sub-umbilical region with a peritoneal effusion in the Douglas. the patient was operated on in the emergency room, approached by laparotomy and found on exploration: Presence of 3 invaginations in the small intestine located at 20cm and 90cm from the Duodenojejunal Angle (DIA) as well as at 25cm from the Last part of the small intestine (DAI), with Presence of a colonic invagination at the level of the left colonic angle. the patient underwent 3 small bowel resections and one segmental colonic resection including segmental small bowel resections: the 1st one of 30 cm taking away an invagination of the small intestine at 20cm from the ADJ, the 2nd one taking away 60cm of invaginated located at 90cm from the ADJ the 3rd one taking away 20cm of invaginated located at 25cm from the DAI and a 4th resection taking away an invagination of the left colonic angle with 3 Anastomosis of the T-T small intestine and a transverse Colostomy in Bouilley Volkman.

On examination by the anapathomopathologist: consistent with a small bowel tumour: well-differentiated intestinal adenocarcinoma on degenerated adenomatous polyps measuring 2.5cm and 1.7cm with an estimated 10% mucinous component with no vascular emboli and no peri-nervous sheathing. TNM stage p: pT2 with healthy resection margins in the left colon: Presence of a tubular adenoma with low grade dysplasia.

Conclusion

The most common symptoms of adenocarcinoma of the small bowel are obstruction, overt or covert bleeding, weight loss and jaundice. Because the small bowel has long been relatively inaccessible to routine endoscopy, the diagnosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma was often delayed for several months after the onset of symptoms. Therefore, in case of suspicion of this type of cancer, a thorough evaluation should be undertaken. Nowadays, endoscopy of the small bowel is widely available, allowing an earlier non-invasive diagnosis.

•

Acute Intestinal Intussusception as a cause of intestinal obstruction is often a diagnostic challenge mimicking a wide spectrum of diseases.

•

Malignant tumours of the small bowel are uncommon in clinical practice. Adenocarcinoma is the most common of these tumours.

•

Its diagnosis is still very difficult.

•

The treatment of Acute Intestinal Intussusception is in most cases surgical.

•

The diagnosis of Acute Intestinal Intussusception is histological.

Endoscopic management of duodenal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Almost all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop duodenal adenomas, with a 4% to 18% risk of progression into duodenal cancer. Prophylactic endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas may prevent cancer and is considered safer than surgical alternatives; however, data are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess safety and effectiveness of endoscopic duodenal interventions in patients with FAP.

METHODS

We performed a historical cohort study including patients with FAP who underwent an endoscopic duodenal intervention between 2002 and 2018. Safety was defined as adverse event rate per intervention and effectiveness as duodenal surgery-free and duodenal cancer-free survival. Change in Spigelman stage was assessed as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

In 68 endoscopy sessions, 139 duodenal polypectomies were performed in 49 patients (20 men; median age, 43). Twenty-nine patients (14 men; median age, 49) underwent a papillectomy. After polypectomy, 9 (13%) bleedings and 1 (2%) perforation occurred, all managed endoscopically. Six (21%) bleedings (endoscopically managed), 4 (14%) cases of pancreatitis, and 1 (3%) perforation (conservatively treated) occurred after papillectomy. Duodenal surgery-free survival was 74% at 89 months after polypectomy and 71% at 71 months after papillectomy; no duodenal cancers were observed. After a median of 18 months (interquartile range, 10-40; range, 3-121) after polypectomy, Spigelman stages were significantly lower (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our FAP patients, prophylactic duodenal polypectomies were relatively safe. Papillectomies showed substantial adverse events, suggesting its benefits and risk should be carefully weighted. Both were effective, however, because surgical interventions were limited and none developed duodenal cancer.

The Prevalence and Significance of Jejunal and Duodenal Bulb Polyposis After Duodenectomy in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence, natural history, and severity of polyposis of the duodenal bulb and jejunum after duodenectomy in patients with FAP.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Advanced duodenal polyposis stage in FAP requires consideration of duodenal resection to prevent cancer; pylorus-preserving approach of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) is preferred. Post-duodenectomy data indicate polyps occur in the duodenal bulb and the post-anastomotic jejunum, but limited data exists regarding their significance.

METHODS

We identified consecutive FAP patients After duodenal resection, including pancreaticoduodenectomy, PSD, or segmental duodenectomy, at Cleveland Clinic. Medical records were used to determine time to diagnosis of duodenal bulb or jejunal polyps, length of follow up, and severity of polyposis including maximal Spigelman stage (SS) of jejunal polyposis (neo-SS).

RESULTS

64 patients with FAP underwent duodenectomy and endoscopic follow up. 28% underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 61% PSD, and 11% segmental duodenectomy. Postoperatively, 38/64 (59%) were diagnosed with jejunal polyposis, with median time to diagnosis of 55 months and follow up time of 127 months. Jejunal polyposis was advanced in 21% (neo- SS III or IV). Fifty percent were treated endoscopically, 1 patient required surgery. Jejunal polyp-free survival after duodenectomy differed by surgery type (P = 0.008). A total of 55/64 patients underwent a pylorus-preserving procedure, and 6/55 (11%) developed duodenal bulb polyps. All bulb polyps were large (>20 mm) and found after PSD. Endoscopic resection was unsuccessful in 5 patients, but no surgical intervention was required.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyposis occurs in the remaining duodenal and jejunal mucosa in the majority of patients after surgical duodenectomy. Jejunal polyposis is advanced in 1 in 5 patients, but rarely requires surgery. Endoscopic management of jejunal polyposis seems feasible but has proven difficult for duodenal bulb polyps.

Surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis: pancreas-sparing duodenectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure)

Duodenal cancer is the main cause of death for patients with FAP syndrome (familial adenomatous polyposis) treated with a colectomy. The disease follows the adenoma to carcinoma sequence and is diagnosed during follow-up in 7-36% of patients. Endoscopic treatment is used during the first treatment stage of the disease and surgery is an adequate therapeutic option when endoscopic control is insufficient.

Endoscopic treatment of severe duodenal polyposis as an alternative to surgery for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and severe (stage IV) duodenal polyposis are candidates for pancreaticoduodenectomy, which has high morbidity. Little information is available about the feasibility of therapeutic endoscopy for these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficiency and risks of endoscopic therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

A 2-referral center long-term cohort study.

PATIENTS

Thirty-five FAP patients (15 men, mean age 48 years) presenting with stage IV duodenal polyposis were included. Patients had a mean Spigelman classification score of 9.8 points (range 9-12 points) at their first examination.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients underwent a surveillance endoscopy, including lateral and axial viewing with chromoendoscopy while under sedation, along with 7 ± 4.8 therapeutic endoscopic sessions during a follow-up period of 9 ± 4.5 years (range 1-19 years) after their first endoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Treatment modalities, adverse events, and efficiency (evolution of the Spigelman score) were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 245 therapeutic endoscopies were performed and 15 adverse events (6%) occurred. During the follow-up period, Spigelman scores decreased in 95% of patients by 6 ± 2.2 points (P = .002). Modeling analysis showed that the mean Spigelman score decreased by 60% after 150 months.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study and the duration of the follow-up, even though this is the longest follow-up reported in medical literature.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of severe duodenal polyposis in patients with FAP produces few adverse events and allows efficient downstaging of the polyposis. Long-term follow-up data did not reveal a high risk of invasive duodenal cancer in these patients.

The role of high-resolution endoscopy and narrow-band imaging in the evaluation of upper GI neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

The Spigelman classification stratifies cancer risk in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients with duodenal adenomatosis. High-resolution endoscopy (HRE) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) may identify lesions at high risk.

OBJECTIVE

To compare HRE and NBI for the detection of duodenal and gastric polyps and to characterize duodenal adenomas harboring advanced histology with HRE and NBI.

DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study. Retrospective image evaluation study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Thirty-seven FAP patients undergoing surveillance upper endoscopies.

INTERVENTION

HRE endoscopy was followed by NBI. The number of gastric polyps and Spigelman staging were compared. Duodenal polyp images were systematically reviewed in a learning and validation phase.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Number of gastric and duodenal polyps detected by HRE and NBI and prevalence of specific endoscopic features in duodenal adenomas with advanced histology.

RESULTS

NBI did not identify additional gastric polyps but detected more duodenal adenomas in 16 examinations, resulting in upgrades of the Spigelman stage in 2 cases (4.4%). Pictures of 168 duodenal adenomas (44% advanced histology) were assessed. In the learning phase, 3 endoscopic features were associated with advanced histology: white color, enlarged villi, and size ≥1 cm. Only size ≥1 cm was confirmed in the validation phase (odds ratio 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-7.4).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized study, scant number of high-grade dysplasia adenomas.

CONCLUSION

Inspection with NBI did not lead to a clinically relevant upgrade in the Spigelman classification and did not improve the detection of gastric polyps in comparison with HRE. The only endoscopic feature that predicted advanced histology of a duodenal adenoma was size ≥1 cm.

Severe duodenal involvement in familial adenomatous polyposis treated by pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy

PURPOSE

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is an alternative to pancreas-sparing duodenectomy for radical treatment of duodenal lesions. The aims of this study were to assess the results of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) for severe duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis in terms of morbidity, long-term influence on functional results, the recurrence rate of cancer or jejunal polyps, and survival.

METHODS

All patients operated on for a PPPD between 1992 and 2009 were included. Clinical data, endoscopic findings, and pathologic examinations were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients underwent PPPD for severe duodenal polyposis (17 Spigelman IV, 1 Spigelman III, and 1 invasive carcinoma). Postoperative mortality was nil. The postoperative morbidity rate was 42%, including 4 pancreatic fistulae (21%) and 2 delayed gastric emptying (11%). Pathologic examination found 7 invasive carcinomas, of which only 1 was known before resection. One third of patients operated on without a preoperative diagnosis of malignancy already had an invasive duodenal carcinoma. After a mean follow-up of 58 months, 16 patients were alive. Thirteen patients underwent endoscopic follow-up, and new adenomas were found in 4 (31%). All were treated successfully during the same endoscopic procedure. PPPD did not modify the functional result after coloproctectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

PPPD remains a safe and efficient therapeutic option for severe duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis patients.

Surgical management for advanced duodenal adenomatosis and duodenal cancer in Dutch patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Duodenal cancer is a major cause of mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The clinical challenge is to perform duodenectomy before cancer develops; however, procedures are associated with complications. Our aim was to gain insight into the pros and cons of prophylactic duodenectomy.

METHODS

Patients with FAP from the nationwide Dutch polyposis registry who underwent prophylactic duodenectomy or were diagnosed with duodenal cancer were identified and classified as having benign disease or cancer at preoperative endoscopy. Surveillance, clinical presentation, surgical management, outcome, survival, and recurrence were compared.

RESULTS

Of 1,066 patients with FAP in the registry, 52 (5%; 25 males) were included: 36 with benign adenomatosis (median: 48 years old; including two (6%) cancer cases diagnosed after operation), and 16 with cancer (median: 53 years old). Cancer cases had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer more often (6% vs 44%; P < .01). Forty-three patients underwent duodenectomy (35 benign/eight cancer): 30-day mortality was 4.7% (n = 2), and in-hospital morbidity occurred in 21 patients (49%), without differences between patients with benign adenomatosis and cancer. Adenomas recurred in reconstructed proximal small bowel in 14 of 28 patients (50%, median time to recurrence: 75 months), and one patient developed cancer. Median survival of all 18 cancer cases in the registry (1.7%; 12 ampullary/six duodenal) was 11 months.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis of duodenal cancer in patients with FAP is poor, which justifies an aggressive approach to advanced benign adenomatosis. Strict adherence to recommended surveillance intervals is essential for a well-timed intervention. Given the substantial morbidity and mortality of duodenectomy, patients' individual characteristics are to be critically evaluated preoperatively. As adenomas recur, postoperative endoscopic surveillance is mandatory.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and ampullary adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop duodenal and ampullary polyps that may progress to malignancy via the adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review a large series of FAP patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and ampullary polyposis.

METHODS

A retrospective case notes review of all FAP patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and ampullary adenomatosis was performed.

RESULTS

Between October 1993 and January 2010, 38 FAP patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and ampullary polyps. Complications occurred in 29 patients and perioperative mortality in two. Postoperative histology revealed five patients to have preoperatively undetected cancer (R = 0.518, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in FAP is associated with significant morbidity, but low mortality. All patients under consideration for operative intervention require careful preoperative counselling and optimization.

Surgical management of the duodenal manifestations of familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Duodenal adenomas develop in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, incurring a risk of carcinoma. When this risk is high, surgery is indicated. The choice of surgical treatment can be difficult as evidence-based data are lacking.

METHODS

This is a systematic review of the literature on the non-medical management of duodenal lesions arising in the setting of familial adenomatous polyposis. Studies were identified through searching MEDLINE. Studies published between January 1965 and October 2009 were included. Data regarding number of subjects, complications, length of follow-up, recurrence rate and outcome were extracted.

RESULTS

Transduodenal resection does not differ from an endoscopic approach in terms of recurrence. Ampullectomy has limited application as only papillary lesions are amenable to treatment in this manner. Duodenectomy with pancreas preservation is preferable to pancreaticoduodenectomy unless malignancy is present, or cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Surgery should be reserved for advanced or malignant polyps.

[Characteristics of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Spain. First results of the Spanish Registry of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Familial adenomatous polyposis is an inherited disorder characterized by the presence of multiple colorectal adenomas (more than 100 in the classic form and between 10 and 100 in the attenuated one), with a high risk of colorectal cancer development. To improve the diagnostic and therapeutic management of these patients, the Spanish Registry of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis was created in 2007.We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Spain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients included in the Registry during one year were evaluated with respect to their demographic, clinical, pathological, and genetic characteristics.

RESULTS

243 patients of 156 unrelated families from 15 Spanish centers were included. One hundred thirty patients were male, and the mean age at diagnosis was 40 years. According to the clinical presentation, 127 corresponded to the classic form and 116 to the attenuated one. Colorectal adenoma with high-grade dysplasia was identified in 67 (28%) patients, and colorectal cancer in 42 (17%). Extracolonic manifestations were: duodenal involvement (n=46), gastric involvement (n=44), desmoid tumors (n=24), thyroid cancer (n=8), osteomas (n=6) and brain tumor (n=1). APC and/or MYH gene testing was performed in 140 (90%) families, detecting the causative mutation in 75 (54%) of them (70 in the APC gene and 5 in the MYH gene).

CONCLUSIONS

During its first year of operability, a large number of patients and families were included in the Registry. The reduced prevalence of colorectal cancer as well as the large proportion of families submitted to gene testing demonstrated a high-quality clinical practice in Spain.

[Small bowel adenocarcinoma]

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare tumor. These tumors are more often sporadic but there is some predisposing disease (Crohn disease, genetic syndrome and rarely celiac disease). Diagnosis is usually performed at an advanced stage because of non-specific nature of clinical manifestations. New methods of radiological and endoscopic exploration of small intestine should allow earlier diagnosis. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment for non-metastasic tumors. The main prognosis factor is lymph nodes involvement. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. For metastatic tumors, 5-fluorouracil and platinum salt combination appears to be the most effective chemotherapy despite of the absence of randomized studies. A national prospective cohort study is currently evaluating the results of chemotherapy (recommended protocol: FOLFOX) as adjuvant and palliative treatment of small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and polyps in the duodenum

BACKGROUND

Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD) was introduced as a replacement for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study analysed the results of PPTD in the Netherlands and reviewed the relevant literature.

METHODS

All 26 patients who underwent PPTD for FAP in four centres in the Netherlands between January 2000 and January 2007 were compared with a group of 77 patients who had PD for ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma at one centre during the same interval.

RESULTS

Morbidity rates were similar after PPTD for FAP (16 patients, 62 per cent) and PD for ampulla of Vater adenocarcinoma (44 patients, 57 per cent) (P = 0.694). One patient (4 per cent) died after PPTD and two (3 per cent) after PD. A review of the literature, including patients from the present study, found that 71 patients had PPTD, with postoperative morbidity in 36 (51 per cent) and one death (1 per cent). In publications containing a total of 94 patients who underwent PD for FAP, 43 (46 per cent) developed complications and three (3 per cent) died.

CONCLUSION

PPTD has similar short-term results to PD in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Complications and follow-up after pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy for duodenal polyps

Background

Patients with duodenal polyps are at risk of duodenal cancer. Pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD) is an alternative to partial pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

Twelve patients (seven men and five women) with a median age of 59 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 50–67) years underwent PPTD for large (over 20 mm) solitary polyps or multiple (more than three) duodenal polyps confined to the muscularis propria on endoscopic ultrasonography.

Results

Median hospital stay was 21 (i.q.r. 10–36) days with no deaths and no blood transfusion. Six patients developed postoperative complications, one requiring reoperation. Histology demonstrated gastrointestinal stromal tumour in three patients, low-grade dysplasia in one, moderate-grade dysplasia in eight and duodenal intramucosal adenocarcinoma in one. During a median follow-up of 20 (i.q.r. 8–41) months one patient experienced recurrent acute pancreatitis (due to hypertriglyceridaemia) and one developed a jejunal adenocarcinoma in the neoduodenum.

Conclusion

The morbidity of PPTD is similar to that of partial pancreatoduodenectomy, but PPTD preserves the whole pancreas and reduces the number of anastomoses.

Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis and lynch syndrome

Familial colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 10% to 20% of all cases of CRC. Two major autosomal dominant forms of heritable CRC are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (also known as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Along with the risk for CRC, both syndromes are associated with elevated risk for other tumors. Improved understanding of the genetic basis of these diseases has not only facilitated the identification and screening of at-risk individuals and the development of prophylactic or early-stage intervention strategies but also provided better insight into sporadic CRC. This article reviews the clinical and genetic characteristics of FAP and Lynch syndrome, recommended screening and surveillance practices, and appropriate surgical and nonsurgical interventions.

Familial adenomatous polyposis and the small bowel: a loco-regional review and current management strategies

Small-bowel tumours are an important cause of morbidity and death in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Intensive endoscopic surveillance is now standard in the long-term management of this condition. Thus, lesions occurring throughout the small bowel are increasingly noted by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and flexible pouchoscopy. Some occur commonly de novo (in stomach, duodenum and ampulla), while others may occur following surgery (polyps of the ileostomy, ileoanal pouch, or small bowel above an anastomosis). These differ widely in incidence, natural history and management. This review provides a regional overview of these lesions, in terms of current research findings and management protocols.

Is there an advantage in performing a pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy in duodenal adenomatosis?

BACKGROUND

Duodenal adenomatosis is a premalignant condition often not treatable by local resection or endoscopy. An option for treatment is a pylorus-preserving (pp)-Whipple resection. Since the introduction of pancreas-preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD), the question has arisen whether a pp-Whipple resection is still needed to treat duodenal adenomatosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a 5-year period 23 PPTDs were performed for duodenal adenomatosis. In a matched-pairs analysis the outcome following PPTD (16 patients with a follow-up longer than 12 months) was compared with pp-Whipple.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality in all 23 patients was 4.3% and total morbidity 30% after PPTD. Operation time, intensive care and hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were comparable between the matched paired groups (16 patients). Patients with PPTD had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss. No PPTD patient required pancreatic enzyme substitution, compared with 12 patients after pp-Whipple. Quality-of-life analysis in PPTD patients revealed no difference compared to a normal control population and the pp-Whipple group.

CONCLUSIONS

PPTD is a safe surgical procedure for duodenal adenomatosis that avoids pancreatic head resection, provides high quality of life, and shows advantages over the pp-Whipple procedure.

Polipose gastroduodenal em doentes com polipose adenomatosa familiar Pós-Retocolectomia

RACIONAL: As manifestações extracólicas, como os pólipos gastroduodenais e o tumor do duodeno, são fatores que influenciam a morbimortalidade dos doentes com polipose adenomatosa familiar no seguimento pós-retocolectomia total. OBJETIVO: Investigar a freqüência destas alterações em doentes com polipose adenomatosa familiar e verificar a eficácia do rastreamento endoscópico. MÉTODO:No período de 1984 a 2005, 62 doentes com polipose adenomatosa familiar pós-retocolectomia foram estudados retrospectivamente pelo Grupo de Coloproctologia da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP. O tempo de seguimento médio pós-operatório foi de 81,9 meses, sendo que em 53 (85,5%) foi possível analisar a ocorrência de pólipos gastroduodenais. RESULTADOS: Dos 53 doentes em seguimento, 27 (50,9%) apresentavam pólipos gastroduodenais. Em 8 (15,4%) os pólipos adenomatosos eram gástricos, 14 (27%) pólipos duodenais e 5 (9,6%) pólipos gástricos e duodenais. Dois doentes (3,8%) desenvolveram adenoma duodenal com displasia de alto grau. E outro (1,9%), adenocarcinoma em papila duodenal. CONCLUSÃO: O rastreamento endoscópico, desta forma, é de grande importância e o objetivo é detectar, o mais precocemente possível, os casos de adenocarcinoma duodenal e pólipos gastroduodenais com displasia de alto grau.

Pancreas-sparing distal duodenectomy for infrapapillary neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

For neoplasms that arise in the third and fourth parts of the duodenum (D(3), D(4)), a duodenectomy that preserves the pancreas can provide adequate tumour clearance while avoiding the additional dissection and risk of the common alternative, pancreatoduodenectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pancreas-sparing distal duodenectomy (PSDD) was performed in 14 patients with infrapapillary duodenal neoplasms between 1991-2002, and the clinical outcome is reviewed. The operation entails careful separation of the lower pancreatic head from D(3), complete mobilisation of the ligament of Treitz and end-to-end duodenojejunal anastomosis 1-3 cm below the major duodenal papilla.

RESULTS

There were 9 men and 5 women of median age 56 years, who presented with iron-deficiency anaemia (n = 8), gastric outlet obstruction (n = 4), anaemia and gastric outlet obstruction (n = 1), epigastric pain or mass (1 each). There were 11 malignant neoplasms (adenocarcinoma 5, stromal tumour 4, recurrent seminoma 1, plasmacytoma 1), 2 benign neoplasms (villous adenoma, lipoma) and 1 patient with steroid-induced ulceration. In addition to D(3) and D(4), resection included the distal part of D(2) in 5 patients, while 4 required concomitant partial colectomy. Median operation time was 240 min and median blood loss 1197 ml, being greater for malignant than benign lesions (1500 ml versus 700 ml). There was one death from gangrenous cholecystitis, one early re-operation for anastomotic bleeding and one late re-operation for delayed gastric emptying secondary to anastomotic stricture, but no pancreatic complications. At a median follow-up of 47 months, three patients had died of recurrent disease while the other 10 were alive and well with no upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Provided there is a minimum 1-cm clearance at the papilla, PSDD is a useful alternative to formal pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with unusual neoplasms arising from the third and fourth parts of the duodenum. Although a major undertaking in its own right, it avoids the extra time of a pancreatic resection and the extra risk of a pancreatic anastomosis.

[Autoregulatory growth control of adenomatous polyps and carcinogenesis in the colorectal region. Basics of tumor surgery Part I]

Autoregulatory growth control of adenomatous polyps in the colon and rectum is an important factor in the success of sphincter-sparing surgical resections. It is the basis for the coexistence of billions of somatic cells in multicellular organisms. Similar to normal mucosa, adenomatous polyps in the colorectum show autoregulatory growth control in their tissues. This applies whether they are differentiated or undifferentiated. In most cases, their growth and expansion is controlled throughout life. While colorectal adenomas have malignant potential, their transformation to cancerous lesions is exceedingly rare (e.g., in familial polyposis, or FAP, with a prevalence of only one in 10,000). It has been hypothesized that "fully developed adenomas" frequently are a prestage of colorectal cancer. However, convincing evidence on a molecular level that this so-called adenoma-carcinoma sequence indeed occurs in vivo is lacking. In contrast, there is good evidence that colorectal carcinogenesis is a microevolutionary process and that the irrevocable loss of autoregulatory growth control is one of its features. The most prominent homing area for colorectal cancer is the rectum. If the rectum is resected, metachronous cancer occurs only very rarely. The most distal quarter of the rectum is cloacal in origin and a pivotal structure for anorectal continence. It should be preserved whenever a more proximal location of the tumor makes this possible. These conclusions are based on our extensive case series and observations extending over several decades.

[Regional growth preferences in hereditary, synchronous, and metachronous colorectal carcinomas. Basics of tumor surgery Part II]

This article discusses the therapeutic importance of the loss of self-regulation of cell division in polypoid adenomas and in the cloacogenic, cancerophilic rectal segment. Regional growth preferences can observed in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis, as in other diseases featuring a cancerous disposition on the mucosa. For example, rectal carcinomas are more common than colon carcinomas if one considers the total mucosal surface area at risk. Malignant changes do not occur randomly in existing adenomas of FAP patients, and the adenomas' cell division--as in other adenomas--is governed by some degree of self-regulation. In FAP patients undergoing proctocolectomy, preferred new growth areas for carcinomas include the duodenum and ileum. In patients with synchronous colorectal cancers, the rectum is more commonly affected than other colon segments. If the rectum is resected, metachronous carcinomas are exceedingly rare in the remaining colon segments. Clinical decisions about rectal resection must be informed by understanding of the importance of this organ for anorectal continence as well as the described growth of colorectal malignancies.

ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes

BACKGROUND

A significant portion of cancers are accounted for by a heritable component, which has increasingly been linked to mutations in specific genes. Clinical interventions have been formulated for mutation carriers within affected families. The primary interventions for mutation carriers of highly penetrant syndromes are surgical.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Society of Surgical Oncology formed a task force charged with presenting an educational symposium on surgical management of hereditary cancer syndromes at annual society meetings, and this resulted in a position paper on this topic. The content of both the symposium and the position paper was developed as a consensus statement.

RESULTS

This article addresses hereditary breast, colorectal, ovarian/endometrial, and multiple endocrine neoplasias. A brief introduction on the genetics and natural history of each disease is provided, followed by detailed descriptions of modern surgical approaches, clinical and genetic indications, timing of prophylactic surgery, and the efficacy of surgery (when known). Although several recent reviews have addressed the role of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, this article focuses on the issues surrounding surgical technique, timing, and indications for surgical prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-reducing surgical treatment of hereditary cancer is a complex undertaking. It requires a clear understanding of the natural history of the disease, realistic appreciation of the potential benefits and risks of these procedures in potentially otherwise healthy individuals, and the long-term sequelae of such interventions, as well as the individual patient's and family's perceptions of surgical risk and anticipated benefit.

ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes

Although the etiology of solid cancers is multifactorial, with environmental and genetic factors playing a variable role, a significant portion of the burden of cancer is accounted for by a heritable component. Increasingly, the heritable component of cancer predispositions has been linked to mutations in specific genes, and clinical interventions have been formulated for mutation carriers within affected families. The primary interventions for mutations carriers for highly penetrant syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasias, familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes are primarily surgical. For that reason, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) have undertaken an educational effort within the oncology community. A joint ASCO/SSO Task Force was charged with presenting an educational symposium on the surgical management of hereditary cancer syndromes at the annual ASCO and SSO meetings, resulting in an educational position article on this topic. Both the content of the symposium and the article were developed as a consensus statement by the Task Force, with the intent of summarizing the current standard of care. This article is divided into four sections addressing breast, colorectal, ovarian and endometrial cancers, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. For each, a brief introduction on the genetics and natural history of the disease is provided, followed by a detailed description of modern surgical approaches, including a description of the clinical and genetic indications and timing of prophylactic surgery, and the efficacy of prophylactic surgery when known. Although a number of recent reviews have addressed the role of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, including the richly illustrated Cancer Genetics and Cancer Predisposition Testing curriculum by the ASCO Cancer Genetics Working Group (available through http://www.asco.org), this article focuses on the issues surrounding the why, how, and when of surgical prophylaxis for inherited forms of cancer. This is a complex process, which requires a clear understanding of the natural history of the disease and variance of penetrance, a realistic appreciation of the potential benefit and risk of a risk-reducing procedure in a potentially otherwise healthy individual, the long-term sequelae of such surgical intervention, as well as the individual patient and family's perception of surgical risk and anticipated benefit.

Surveillance and management of upper gastrointestinal disease in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Almost all patients affected by Familial Adenomatous polyposis (FAP) will develop foregut as well as hindgut polyps, and following prophylactic colectomy duodenal cancer constitutes one of the leading causes of death in screened populations. Without prophylactic colectomy, FAP patients predictably develop colorectal cancer, but the lifetime risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer is lower, estimated at approximately 5%. Management of the upper gastrointestinal cancer risk is one of the greatest challenges facing clinicians involved in the care of Polyposis families, and with improved survival following prophylactic colectomy, the burden of foregut disease (particularly duodenal adenomatosis) will increase. Until recently, the value of upper gastrointestinal surveillance in FAP populations has been contentious, but with improved understanding of the natural history coupled with developments in surgery, interventional endoscopy and medical therapy, treatment algorithms for duodenal adenomatosis in FAP are becoming clearer.

Large duodenal villous adenoma requiring head of the pancreas and pylorus-preserving total duodenectomy

Villous adenomas of the duodenum (VAD) are infrequent lesions of the gastrointestinal tract but have a high risk of recurrence and malignancy. For these reasons and its specific topographic location, the surgical treatment of VAD is still controversial. Herein we present a case of large VAD located in the second duodenal portion that was successfully treated with a head of the pancreas, pylorus-preserving total duodenectomy (PPTD). PPTD should be an excellent option in patients with large adenomas because it allows preservation of the pancreas, gastrointestinal function is maintained, the possibility of a recurrence and of an invasive carcinoma of the ampulla is eliminated, and finally because it permits an adequate endoscopic follow-up. PPTD should not be used in the presence of malignancy and/or high-grade dysplasia.

[Multivisceral resections of extracolorectal lesions in familial adenomatous polyposis]

AIMS

1/ To report our experience with multivisceral resections in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) for extracolorectal lesions in a cohort of nine patients. 2/ Discuss the long term results of an agressive surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine patients (7 males and 2 females) were operated at the University Hospital of Nimes (N=4) and Nantes (N=5). The median age at the first operation was 29 years (range 18-43). A genetic study was performed in six patients and confirmed the mutation on APC gene (exon 11, 13 and 15). All the patients were operated through a classic laparotomy.

RESULTS

All patients have underwent a mean of three operations (range 2-5). Eight patients have had initially a total colectomy and 4 underwent subsequent proctectomy. Seven patients had pancreaticoduodenectomy for extensive duodenal adenomas and/or carcinoma. Three had one or multiple small bowel resections for development of carcinoma and one had partial gastric resection for large adenovillous tumor. The median follow up was 25 years (range 15-37) since the first operation. Three patients were died: one of gastric cancer with hepatic metastases, one of peritoneal carcinosis after ileal resection and one of astrocytoma.

CONCLUSION

With regard to these nine observations, the authors underline the possibility of multivisceral resection in FAP. Despite a major digestive mutilation, it permits a long survival with acceptable quality of life. The prognosis depends on the aggressiveness of the duodenal or jejunoileal lesions more than of the colorectal tumors if found at the first resection.

Transduodenal resection of peri-ampullary lesions

Transduodenal resection (TDR) of lesions near the ampulla of Vater is an alternative to the Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the long-term outcome and the utility of intraoperative frozen section examinations in aiding operative decision making in patients undergoing TDR. From 1992 to 2002, 19 patients with an average age of 64.2 years (range: 33-84 years) underwent a transduodenal resection of a peri-ampullary lesion; median follow-up was 47 months (range: 2-100 months). Pathology of the lesions was as follows: 11 with benign ampullary adenomas, including 4 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP); 7 with peri-ampullary adenocarcinomas; and 1 with a benign stricture. Survival for the entire cohort is 100%. In 12 cases an intraoperative frozen section was performed. The specificity and positive predictive value of the intraoperative histology were both 100%, and the sensitivity and negative predictive value were 57% and 38%, respectively. Three of the 4 patients with FAP have recurrent adenomatous change; 2 of the 7 with carcinoma have metastatic adenocarcinoma. Transduodenal resection of peri-ampullary lesions appears to be a safe alternative to radical resection for benign adenomas and selected carcinoma. Intraoperative frozen section assessment is recommended in cases of potential adenocarcinoma.

Endoscopic management of familial colonic neoplasia

Heredity plays an important causative role in a large percentage of colorectal cancers. Clinical recognition of the hereditary polyposis syndromes, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, and common familial colorectal cancer is essential because screening, surveillance, and treatment among affected individuals and their family members differs from that recommended for the general population. More intensive cancer screening and surveillance is required if premature death is to be avoided. Genetic testing is commercially available for most of the hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes and can greatly facilitate the management of patients if properly undertaken.

Liposome-mediated adenomatous polyposis coli gene therapy: a novel anti-adenoma strategy in multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse model

PURPOSE

Familial adenomatous polyposis is a highly penetrant, autosomal dominant disease resulting from a germline mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Besides colorectal polyps and cancer, more than 90 percent of familial adenomatous polyposis patients also develop duodenal polyposis with an approximately 5 percent lifetime risk of malignant transformation. Because adenomatous polyposis coli protein has a "gatekeeper role" in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, replacing its function may reduce polyp formation. We studied the functional outcome of per-oral, liposome-mediated adenomatous polyposis coli gene replacement therapy in a multiple intestinal neoplasia mouse model.

METHODS

Twenty multiple intestinal neoplasia mice, heterozygous for the human homologue adenomatous polyposis coli gene, were randomly assigned to three groups: no treatment (n = 8); control plasmid containing green fluorescence protein reporter gene (n = 6); and plasmid containing the full-length adenomatous polyposis coli gene (n = 6). For the adenomatous polyposis coli-treated and green fluorescence protein reporter gene-treated groups, each mouse received the appropriate plasmid complexed with liposome, administered twice per week by oral gavage regime. Treatment lasted four weeks and all animals were killed at the end of treatment period with harvesting of intestinal tissue for polyp number estimation.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant 25 percent reduction in the total number of polyps in the adenomatous polyposis coli-treated (73.1 +/- 1.4) group compared with untreated control (97.8 +/- 5.3, P < 0.01, Tukey test) and multiple intestinal neoplasia mice treated with control green fluorescence protein gene (103.3 +/- 1.7, P < 0.01, Tukey test).

CONCLUSION

Adenomatous polyposis coli gene dysfunction underlies tumorigenesis in familial adenomatous polyposis patients and multiple intestinal neoplasia mice. This in vivo study provides evidence to support a novel anti-adenoma strategy using enteral adenomatous polyposis coli gene replacement therapy.

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal disease in familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Although only 5 per cent of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) die from duodenal cancer, a recent study indicated that the mortality rate is much higher in patients with Spigelman stage IV disease. This has prompted an increased rate of referral for excisional surgery and an analysis of the results.

METHODS

Between January 1994 and June 2002, 16 patients with FAP (mean age 55 years; eight men) were referred to a single surgeon for pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenal resection for Spigelman stage IV duodenal adenomatosis.

RESULTS

One patient died from multiple organ failure after relaparotomy for haemorrhage and a jejunal perforation; other major complications included anastomotic leak (one), primary haemorrhage (one), lymphatic leak (one), chylous ascites (one), pulmonary embolus (two) and prolonged delayed gastric emptying that required total parenteral nutrition (three). Overall there were 11 major complications in eight patients. Two patients developed insulin-dependent diabetes and one postprandial dumping. Postoperative histological examination revealed five unsuspected cancers, which led to four deaths within 3 years of surgery. One patient died 2 months after surgery from pulmonary thromboembolism and another at 5 months from an inoperable brain tumour. Nine of the 16 patients were alive and well at a mean of 38 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The choice between continued endoscopic surveillance and excisional surgery for Spigelman stage IV duodenal disease remains finely balanced.

Surveillance and treatment of periampullary and duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a cumulative lifetime risk of over 90% for developing duodenal adenomas, which are the precursor lesions for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Consequently, these patients have a 5% to 10% lifetime risk of periampullary or duodenal adenocarcinoma, making this the leading cause of cancer death in FAP patients who have had prophylactic colectomies. The increased relative risk of duodenal carcinoma in FAP patients and the poor outcomes associated with the treatment of advanced duodenal cancer have led to the development of prevention strategies for this cancer in the setting of FAP. It is generally accepted that surveillance for duodenal adenomas and adenocarcinomas should be included in the management of patients with FAP, although there are few data from clinical trials that demonstrate the effectiveness of surveillance strategies or chemoprevention for the prevention of death from duodenal cancer. Prospective case series have shown that endoscopic surveillance with endoscopic or surgical treatment of high-risk lesions in the duodenal or periampullary region can be performed with successful removal of the at-risk lesion(s). Surveillance should begin at about 21 years of age and should be performed using both an end-viewing and a side-viewing upper endoscope. An interval of 3 to 5 years between examinations appears to be adequate if no polyposis is evident. Once polyposis develops, an interval of 1 to 3 years between screenings for mild polyposis is appropriate. Patients with denser polyposis or larger adenomas are recommended to undergo examination every 6 to 12 months because of their increased risk of developing duodenal adenocarcinoma. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy with sulindac, a nonselective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, or celecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, may be of benefit after the development of duodenal polyposis by inducing the regression or stabilization of the polyposis, although there is limited evidence from randomized, controlled trials to support its routine use. Almost all cases of adenocarcinoma occur in patients with advanced polyposis (Spigelman stage IV disease), and approximately 33% of this group will go on to develop adenocarcinoma if left untreated. The most definitive procedure for reducing the risk of adenocarcinoma is surgical resection of the ampulla and/or duodenum. Pancreaticoduodenectomy or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy are appropriate surgical therapies that are believed to substantially reduce the risk of developing periampullary adenocarcinoma. However, these procedures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including the risk of inducing desmoid tumor formation in FAP patients.

Worldwide survey among polyposis registries of surgical management of severe duodenal adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

The lifetime risk of developing duodenal cancer in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is about 5 per cent. When and to what extent surgical intervention should be undertaken to prevent death from invasive carcinoma is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of various surgical treatments for cancer and severe duodenal adenomatosis.

METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed to the members of the Leeds Castle Polyposis Group to obtain data on patients with FAP, treated for duodenal cancer or severe duodenal adenomatosis after 1990.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included. The indication for surgery was invasive cancer in 13 patients, of whom six died from metastatic disease. Fifty-six patients were initially treated for severe duodenal adenomatosis, five (9 per cent) of whom died from metastatic disease (P = 0.002). In surviving patients, adenomas recurred after ampullectomy (six of eight, at mean follow-up of 11 months), after duodenotomy with polypectomy (17 of 21, at mean 29 months) and after pancreatoduodenectomy (six of 25, at mean 47 months). None of six patients who underwent a pancreas-sparing duodenectomy had recurrence of adenoma (mean follow-up 11 months).

CONCLUSION

Surgery for duodenal adenomatosis should take place before endoscopic biopsy reveals invasive cancer. Even after extensive surgical procedures, small bowel adenomas may occur, emphasizing the need for chemoprevention.

Histological evaluation of preoperative biopsies from ampulla vateri

Frequency of the lesions of the papilla Vateri is increasing in Hungary because of epidemiological reasons. Over two years nearly 300 ampullary endoscopic biopsies were taken in our hospital. In 36 percent of the patients the papillary specimens demonstrated acute or chronic inflammation, in 44 percent adenoma, including 5 percent with severe dysplasia, in 5 percent adenomatous hyperplasia and in 7 percent adenomyosis or other benign tumors (2%) were found. Around 7 percent of the ampullary samples proved to be malignant, but only in 2.6 percent were the malignancy of intraampullary origin. Nearly 25 percent of biopsies were repeated once and 10 percent twice or more. Concordance of endoscopic and pathologic diagnoses was 69 percent on average but it increased to 83 percent after including repeated biopsies. In the adenoma-carcinoma group the concordance was 90 percent. The sensitivity of the pathological diagnosis with forceps biopsy was only 77 percent, but it became at least 86 percent following papillectomy. In order to improve diagnostic reliability more extensive use of papillectomy is proposed with close cooperation between the endoscopist and pathologist.

Long-term follow-up of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing pancreaticoduodenal surgery

Adenomatous polyps and adenocarcinomas of the periampullary region are the most common upper gastrointestinal neoplasms encountered in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. Tumors arising from the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas have also been reported. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical outcome of FAP patients after pancreaticoduodenal surgery for periampullary neoplasms. Of the 61 individuals participating in our prospective FAP registry, 8 underwent surgical resection of periampullary neoplasms between 1987 and 1998. The charts of these individuals were reviewed for clinical indications, type of pancreaticoduodenal surgery, postoperative complications, and outcome. Of the 8 patients identified, 7 had pancreaticoduodenectomy and 1 had duodenotomy with ampullectomy. The indications for surgery were periampullary cancer (3), severe dysplasia within a duodenal villous tumor (4), and solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (1). At the time of pancreaticoduodenal surgery, patients ranged in age from 29-65 years, and all but one had undergone colorectal surgery, on average 16 years beforehand. Pancreatic ascites after a pylorus-sparing pancreaticoduodenectomy was the only surgical complication. At a median follow-up of 70.5 months (range 37-162), 2 patients had died, neither from their periampullary neoplasm. The patient treated by local excision subsequently developed gastric cancer arising from a polyp and went on to gastrectomy. Another patient developed confluent benign jejunal adenomas just beyond the gastroenteric anastomosis almost 12 years after pancreaticoduodenectomy for severe dysplasia of a duodenal villous adenoma. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe and appropriate surgical option for FAP patients with duodenal villous tumors containing severe dysplasia or carcinoma. Postoperative morbidity was minimal and there was no perioperative mortality. Good long-term prognosis can be expected in completely resected patients although subsequent proliferative and/or neoplastic lesions may still be detected in the gastrointestinal tract with prolonged follow-up.

Familial and inherited colorectal cancer: endoscopic screening and surveillance

Familial risk of colorectal cancer is very common. The high-risk inherited syndromes are well described and much is known about the genetics and the effectiveness of registration, endoscopic surveillance, and appropriate intervention in these patients. The inherited syndromes, however, are extremely rare. There is a large group of patients in our population who can benefit from risk stratification based on the number of their relatives with colon cancer or adenomas and the age at which those relatives developed neoplasm. The GI endoscopist has a vital role in recommending and providing colonoscopic screening for this large group of patients.

Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of gastric acid-lowering therapy on duodenal polyposis and relative adduct labeling in familial adenomatous polyposis

PURPOSE

Bile has been implicated in the pathogenesis of duodenal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. In vitro experiments have shown that familial adenomatous polyposis bile is capable of producing DNA adducts. This effect can be ameliorated by increasing the pH of the incubate. The aim of this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was to examine the effect of oral ranitidine on duodenal polyposis in a group of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with familial adenomatous polyposis were randomly assigned to ranitidine 300 mg daily or placebo for six months after baseline endoscopy. Polyp counts were performed and biopsy specimens taken to detect DNA adducts by 32P-postlabeling.

RESULTS

No difference was seen in polyp numbers (P = 0.9) or relative adduct labeling (P = 0.7) after treatment with ranitidine or placebo.

DISCUSSION

Acid suppression therapy does not seem to improve duodenal polyposis despite in vitro findings. On the other hand, ranitidine does not exacerbate actual (or markers of) neoplasia in this highly tumor-prone condition.

Cancer genetics in oncology practice

Cancer is a genetic disease caused by the progressive accumulation of mutations in critical genes that control cell growth and differentiation. Completion of the Human Genome Project promises to revolutionize the practice of Medicine, especially Oncology care. The tremendous gains in the knowledge of the structure and function of human genes will surely impact the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Moreover, it will lead to more effective cancer control through the use of genetics to quantify individual cancer risks. This article reviews the current status of genetic testing and counseling for cancer risk assessment and will suggest a framework for integrating such counseling into oncology practice.

Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel

Cancer of the small bowel is a rare entity but its incidence is rising. Historically, outcome is poor despite apparent curative resection. At present surgery remains the only treatment modality of proven benefit in the management of this disease. Recent data would suggest 5-year survival rates in the order of 40-50% at all sites of small bowel cancer. To improve upon this, earlier diagnosis with a high index of suspicion and multicentre adjuvant therapy trials are required.