Expression patterns of Raf-1 suggest multiple roles in tooth development

Bimodal expression of Wnt5a in the tooth germ: A comparative study using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND

During tooth development, Wnt5a, a member of the noncanonical Wnt ligand, is expressed prominently in the dental mesenchyme. However, the spatiotemporal profiles of Wnt5a protein production and distribution in tooth germs are largely unknown, which impairs elucidation of the Wnt5a-mediated regulatory mechanism of tooth development.

METHODS

We performed analyzes of the spatiotemporal expression of Wnt5a in embryonic tooth germs (E11.5-E18.5) by using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in parallel. The developmental stages of the embryonic tooth germs were determined by HE staining. In order to compare the spatiotemporal distribution patterns of Wnt5a mRNA-expressing cells and those of Wnt5a protein-expressing cells, serial frontal sections of paraffinized mouse embryo heads were used for the analyzes. When needed, the immunohistochemistry images were subjected to digital detection analysis of Wnt5a immunostaining signal using the WinROOF 2018 Ver. 4.19.0 image processing software program.

RESULTS

Throughout the developmental process, cells expressing Wnt5a mRNA were found in various tissues including the dental follicle, dental papilla, inner and outer enamel epithelium, stratum intermediate, and stellate reticulum. However, odontoblasts differentiating and polarizing at E18.5 were the only cells representing an accumulation of Wnt5a protein in the apical region of the odontoblast process. The Wnt5a protein was undetectable in undifferentiated mesenchymal cells as well as any other cells positive for Wnt5a mRNA.

CONCLUSION

Differentiating odontoblasts execute Wnt5a expression, the mode of which is distinct from that executed by the other cells constituting tooth germ. Change of the mode of Wnt5a expression begins to take place in the mesenchymal cells by E18.5, starting the elongation of the cytoplasmic process.

Mutant DLX 3 disrupts odontoblast polarization and dentin formation

Tricho-dento-osseous (TDO) syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by abnormalities in the thickness and density of bones and teeth. A 4-bp deletion mutation in the Distal-Less 3 (DLX3) gene is etiologic for most cases of TDO. To investigate the in vivo role of mutant DLX3 (MT-DLX3) on dentin development, we generated transgenic (TG) mice expressing MT-DLX3 driven by a mouse 2.3 Col1A1 promoter. Dentin defects were radiographically evident in all teeth and the size of the nonmineralized pulp was enlarged in TG mice, consistent with clinical characteristics in patients with TDO. High-resolution radiography, microcomputed tomography, and SEM revealed a reduced zone of mineralized dentin with anomalies in the number and organization of dentinal tubules in MT-DLX3 TG mice. Histological and immunohistochemical studies demonstrated that the decreased dentin was accompanied by altered odontoblast cytology that included disruption of odontoblast polarization and reduced numbers of odontoblasts. TUNEL assays indicated enhanced odontoblast apoptosis. Expression levels of the apoptotic marker caspase-3 were increased in odontoblasts in TG mice as well as in odontoblastic-like MDPC-23 cells transfected with MT-DLX3 cDNA. Expression of Runx2, Wnt 10A, and TBC1D19 colocalized with DLX3 expression in odontoblasts, and MT-DLX3 significantly reduced expression of all three genes. TBC1D19 functions in cell polarity and decreased TBC1D19 expression may contribute to the observed disruption of odontoblast polarity and apoptosis. These data indicate that MT-DLX3 acts to disrupt odontoblast cytodifferentiation leading to odontoblast apoptosis, and aberrations of dentin tubule formation and dentin matrix production, resulting in decreased dentin and taurodontism. In summary, this TG model demonstrates that MT-DLX3 has differential effects on matrix production and mineralization in dentin and bone and provides a novel tool for the investigation of odontoblast biology.

K-Ras gene status and expression of Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling molecules in ameloblastomas

BACKGROUND

To clarify the roles of rat sarcoma (Ras)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway in oncogenesis and cytodifferentiation of odontogenic tumors, K-Ras gene status and expression of Ras, Raf1, MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK)1, and ERK1/2 proteins were analyzed in ameloblastomas as well as in tooth germs.

METHODS

Paraffin sections of 10 tooth germs and 46 benign and 6 malignant ameloblastomas were examined immunohistochemically for the expression of K-Ras, Raf1, MEK1, and ERK1/2. Frozen tissue samples of 22 benign ameloblastomas and 1 malignant (metastasizing) ameloblastoma were analyzed by direct DNA sequencing to detect K-Ras gene alteration.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical reactivity for K-Ras, Raf1, MEK1, and ERK1/2 was detected in both normal and neoplastic odontogenic epithelium, and these molecules were reactive chiefly with odontogenic epithelial cells neighboring the basement membrane. Plexiform ameloblastomas showed slightly stronger expression of these Ras/MAPK signaling molecules than follicular ameloblastomas. Keratinizing cells and granular cells showed decreased reactivity for the signaling molecules. Basal cell ameloblastomas showed slightly stronger reactivity for the signaling molecules than did the other subtypes. K-Ras immunoreactivity in malignant ameloblastomas was lower than that in dental lamina of tooth germs. Direct DNA sequencing showed a GGT to GCT point mutation at codon 12 of K-Ras gene in one ameloblastoma.

CONCLUSION

Expression of K-Ras, Raf1, MEK1, and ERK1/2 in tooth germs and ameloblastomas suggests that Ras/MAPK signaling pathway functions to regulate cell proliferation and differentiation in both normal and neoplastic odontogenic epithelium. K-Ras gene status implied that K-Ras mutations might play a minor role in oncogenesis of odontogenic epithelium.

Odontoblast commitment and differentiation

Histological and cytological organization confer specificity to the odontoblasts. These postmitotic, neural crest derived, polarized cells are aligned in a single layer at the periphery of the dental pulp and secrete the organic components of predentin-dentin. The developmental history of these cells demands a cascade of epigenetic signalling events comprising the acquisition of odontogenic potential by neural crest cells, their patterning in the developing jaws, the initiation of odontogenesis through interaction with the oral epithelium, commitment, and tooth-specific spatial distribution of competent preodontoblasts able to overtly differentiate. Recent experimental investigations are critically summarized, many open questions are stressed, and current hypotheses concerning the control of terminal odontoblast differentiation are outlined.Key words: odontoblast, neural crest, oral ectoderm, differentiation.

The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis

In two interrelated articles, the current revision of the functional matrix hypothesis extends to a reconsideration of the relative roles of genomic and of epigenetic processes and mechanisms in the regulation (control, causation) of craniofacial growth and development. The dialectical method was chosen to analyze this matter, because it explicitly provides for the fuller presentation of a genomic thesis, an epigenetic antithesis, and a resolving synthesis. The later two are presented here, where the synthesis suggests that both genomic and epigenetic factors are necessary causes, that neither alone is also a sufficient cause, and that only the two, interacting together, furnish both the necessary and sufficient cause(s) of ontogenesis. This article also provides a comprehensive bibliography that introduces the several new, and still evolving, disciplines that may provide alternative viewpoints capable of resolving this continuing controversy; repetition of the present theoretical bases for the arguments on both sides of these questions seems nonproductive. In their place, it is suggested that the group of disciplines, broadly termed Complexity, would most likely amply repay deeper consideration and application in the study of ontogenesis.