Impact of the opening of a specialized cardiac surgery recovery unit on postoperative outcomes in an academic health sciences centre

Current Status of Adult Post-Cardiac Surgery Critical Care in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

The field of cardiac surgery in Saudi Arabia has developed significantly over the years, with more advanced procedures being performed for high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities. This poses challenging postoperative management issues requiring multidisciplinary, highly organized expert care in cardiovascular critical care. This survey aimed to describe the current state of postoperative critical care for cardiac surgeries in Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN

This e-mail survey developed by the Chapter of Adult Cardiovascular Critical Care of the Saudi Critical Care Society included 61 questions pertaining to the geographic distribution of adult cardiac surgery centers in Saudi Arabia, including what types of operations and how many operations are being performed, and information on intensive care units such as data on staffing, equipment, protocols, and outcome assessment in these units.

SETTING

The study was conducted in Saudi Arabia.

PARTICIPANTS

Participating physicians included representatives of adult intensive care units in all cardiac centers (N = 42).

INTERVENTIONS

There were no interventions in this study.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the study cardiac centers, 71.4% have specialized cardiovascular critical care units for the postoperative care of cardiac patients and 42.9% are managed in a closed design by expert in-house physicians on a 24-hour basis. The estimated cardiac surgery intensive care unit bed capacity in Saudi Arabia is 7.3 (ranging from 3.0 in Qasim Region to 11.6 in Mecca Region) beds/1 million population, with 1.3 cardiac centers/1 million and 79 centers/1 million cardiovascular surgical patients. Several protocols are implemented in these critical care units with key performance indicators to meet the best quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac surgery intensive care units in Saudi Arabia have varying management structures, care practices, and healthcare provider staffing models, although most of the large-volume centers are adopting the intensivist-led team model of care. Guidelines are needed to standardize practice in all cardiac surgery centers regarding processes and protocols, intensive care unit staffing models, and reporting of outcomes and key performance indicators. Further studies are needed to study cardiac surgery intensive care unit factors related to patient outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Effect of an mHealth self-help intervention on readmission after adult cardiac surgery: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Aim

To describe a protocol for the pilot phase of a trial designed to test the effect of an mHealth intervention on representation and readmission after adult cardiac surgery.

Design

A multisite, parallel group, pilot randomized controlled trial (ethics approval: HREC2020.331‐RMH69278).

Methods

Adult patients scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve surgery, or a combination of bypass grafting and valve surgery or aortic surgery) will be recruited from three metropolitan tertiary teaching hospitals. Patients allocated to the control group with receive usual care that is comprised of in‐patient discharge education and local paper‐based written discharge materials. Patients in the intervention group will be provided access to tailored ‘GoShare’ mHealth bundles preoperatively, in a week of hospital discharge and 30 days after surgery. The mHealth bundles are comprised of patient narrative videos, animations and links to reputable resources. Bundles can be accessed via a smartphone, tablet or computer. Bundles are evidence‐based and designed to improve patient self‐efficacy and self‐management behaviours, and to empower people to have a more active role in their healthcare. Computer‐generated permuted block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 will be generated for each site. At the time of consent, and 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery quality of life and level of patient activation will be measured. In addition, rates of representation and readmission to hospital will be tracked and verified via data linkage 1 year after the date of surgery.

Discussion

Interventions using mHealth technologies have proven effectiveness for a range of cardiovascular conditions with limited testing in cardiac surgical populations.

Impact

This study provides an opportunity to improve patient outcome and experience for adults undergoing cardiac surgery by empowering patients as end‐users with strategies for self‐help.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621000082808.

Survey of Contemporary Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit Models in the United States

BACKGROUND

Intensive care unit (ICU) structure and intensive care physician staffing (IPS) models are thought to influence outcomes after cardiac surgery. Given limited information on staffing in the cardiothoracic ICU, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Critical Care undertook a survey to describe current IPS models. We hypothesized that variability would exist throughout the United States.

METHODS

A survey was sent to The Society of Thoracic Surgeons centers in the United States. Center case volume, ICU census, procedure profiles, and the primary specialties of consultants were queried. Definitions of IPS models were open (managed by cardiac surgeons), closed (all decisions made by dedicated intensivists 7 days a week), or semiopen (intensivist attends 5-7 days a week with surgeons cosharing management). Experience level of bedside providers and after-hours provider coverage were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 965 centers contacted, 148 (15.3%) completed surveys. Approximately 41% of reporting centers used a dedicated cardiothoracic ICU for immediate postoperative management. The most common IPS model was open (47%), followed by semiopen (41%) and closed (12%). The primary specialties of intensivists varied, with pulmonary medicine/critical care being predominant (67%). Physician assistants were the most common after-hours provider (44%). More than one-third of responding centers described having no house staff, other than bedside nurses, for nighttime coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiothoracic ICU models vary widely in the United States, with almost half being open, often with no in-house coverage. In-house nighttime coverage was (1) not driven by case complexity and (2) most commonly provided by a physician assistant. Clinical outcomes associated with different ISPS models require further evaluation.

Cardiac-Referenced Leukocyte Telomere Length and Outcomes After Cardiovascular Surgery

•

Short leukocyte telomeres have been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in population studies, but this relationship has not translated to patient care. The authors report a telomere length autologous referencing strategy that has the potential to mark biological aging and to identify high-risk individuals.

•

Among 163 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery, telomeres in leukocytes and skeletal muscle displayed age-related shortening, whereas the telomere length in the cardiac right atrium was stable during 6 decades of life.

•

The magnitude of the telomere length gap between cardiac atrial tissue and leukocytes was associated with post-operative complications and length of stay in the intensive care unit.

•

This study provided proof of concept that a single-time, internally referenced assessment of leukocyte telomere shortening behavior could inform acute risks in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Leukocyte telomere shortening reflects stress burdens and has been associated with cardiac events. However, the patient-specific clinical value of telomere assessment remains unknown. Moreover, telomere shortening cannot be inferred from a single telomere length assessment. The authors investigated and developed a novel strategy for gauging leukocyte telomere shortening using autologous cardiac atrial referencing. Using multitissue assessments from 163 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery, we determined that the cardiac atrium-leukocyte telomere length difference predicted post-operative complexity. This constituted the first evidence that a single-time assessment of telomere dynamics might be salient to acute cardiac care.

Postoperative Critical Care of the Adult Cardiac Surgical Patient. Part I: Routine Postoperative Care

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac surgery, including coronary artery bypass, cardiac valve, and aortic procedures, is among the most common surgical procedures performed in the United States. Successful outcomes after cardiac surgery depend on optimum postoperative critical care. The cardiac intensivist must have a comprehensive understanding of cardiopulmonary physiology and the sequelae of cardiopulmonary bypass. In this concise review, targeted at intensivists and surgeons, we discuss the routine management of the postoperative cardiac surgical patient.

DATA SOURCE AND SYNTHESIS

Narrative review of relevant English-language peer-reviewed medical literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical care of the cardiac surgical patient is a complex and dynamic endeavor. Adequate fluid resuscitation, appropriate inotropic support, attention to rewarming, and ventilator management are key components. Patient safety is enhanced by experienced personnel, a structured handover between the operating room and ICU teams, and appropriate transfusion strategies.

Dedicated pediatric cardiac intensive care unit in a developing country: Does it improve the outcome?

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Focussed cardiac intensive care is known to produce better outcomes. We have evaluated the benefits of a dedicated Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (PCICU) in the early postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of 634 consecutive patients who underwent congenital heart surgery from September 2008 to September 2009 were analyzed. Midway through this period a dedicated PCICU was started. The patients who were treated in this new PCICU formed the study group (Group B, n = 318). The patients who were treated in a common postoperative cardiac surgery ICU formed the control group (Group A, n = 316). Early postoperative outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable with respect to demographic data and intraoperative variables. The duration of mechanical ventilation in the dedicated pediatric cardiac ICU group (32.22 ± 52.02 hours) was lower when compared with the combined adult and pediatric surgery ICU group (42.92 ± 74.24 hours, P= 0.04). There was a shorter duration of ICU stay in the dedicated pediatric cardiac ICU group (2.69 ± 2.9 days vs. 3.43 ± 3.80 days, P = 0.001). The study group also showed a shorter duration of inotropic support and duration of invasive lines. The incidence of blood stream infections was also lower in the dedicated pediatric ICU group (5.03 vs. 9.18%, P = 0.04). A subgroup analysis of neonates and infants <1 year showed that the advantages of a dedicated pediatric intensive care unit were more pronounced in this group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Establishment of a dedicated pediatric cardiac intensive care unit has shown better outcomes in terms of earlier extubation, de-intensification, and discharge from the ICU. Blood stream infections were also reduced.

Impact of dexmedetomidine on analgesic requirements in patients after cardiac surgery in a fast-track recovery room setting

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative opioid requirements in patients who received dexmedetomidine versus propofol after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large, community teaching hospital that uses a fast-track cardiovascular recovery unit (CVRU) model.

PATIENTS

One hundred adults who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and/or valvular surgery, and who received either dexmedetomidine (50 patients) or propofol (50 patients) for perioperative sedation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were matched according to surgery type and left ventricular ejection fraction. Opioid requirements were assessed over two time intervals: from arrival in the CVRU to discontinuation of the sedative infusion, and from CVRU arrival to CVRU discharge, up to a maximum of 72 hours if admission to the intensive care unit was necessary. All postoperative opioid doses were converted to morphine equivalents. Length of mechanical ventilation, quality of sedation, adverse drug events, and sedation-related costs were determined. Opioid requirements were significantly lower during the sedative infusion period for dexmedetomidine-treated patients than for propofol-treated patients (median [range] 0 [0-10 mg] vs 4 mg [0-33 mg], p<0.001), but not through the entire CVRU admission (median [range] 26 mg [0-119 mg] vs 30 mg (0-100 mg], p=0.284). The proportion of patients who did not require opioids during the infusion was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the propofol group (32 [64%] vs 13 [26%], p<0.001). No significant differences were noted between the groups for length of mechanical ventilation, quality of sedation, or adverse events. Sedation-related costs were significantly higher (approximately $50/patient higher) with dexmedetomidine (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine resulted in lower opioid requirements in patients after cardiac surgery versus those receiving propofol, but this did not result in shorter durations of mechanical ventilation, using a fast-track CVRU model.

[Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia. Effective, safe and economical]

BACKGROUND

In November 2005 a complex, multimodal anesthesia fast-track protocol (FTP) was introduced for elective cardiac surgery patients in the Cardiac Center of the University of Leipzig which included changing from an opioid regime to remifentanil and postoperative treatment in a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit. The goal was to speed up recovery times while maintaining safety and improving costs.

METHOD

A total of 421 patients who underwent the FTP and were treated in the special recovery room were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were compared with patients who had been treated by a standard protocol (SP) prior to instituting the FTP. Primary outcomes were time to extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and treatment costs.

RESULTS

The times to extubation were significantly shorter in the FTP group with 75 min (range 45-110 min) compared to 900 min (range 600-1140 min) in the SP group. Intensive care unit stay and hospital length of stay were also significantly shorter in the FTP group (p<0.01). The reduction of treatment costs of intensive care for FTP patients was 53.5% corresponding to savings of EUR 738 per patient in the FTP group compared with the SP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The Leipzig fast-track protocol for cardio-anesthesia including the central elements of switching opiate therapy to remifentanil and switching patient recovery to a special post-anesthesia recovery and care unit, shortened therapy times, is safe and economically effective.