[The alcoholic patient in the daily routine]

Impact of blood alcohol concentration on hematologic and serum chemistry parameters in trauma patients: Analysis of data from a high-volume level 1 trauma center

Background

Alcohol (EtOH) intoxication is common among trauma patients. While providers are familiar with the clinical aspects of acute EtOH intoxication, few studies have investigated the effects that EtOH levels may have on common laboratory markers. The aim of this study was to identify hematologic and serum chemistry parameters that may be affected by the blood alcohol concentration (BAC), hypothesizing that BAC influences both comprehensive blood count (CBC) and comprehensive serum chemistry (CSC) components.

Methods

We performed an IRB-exempt institutional registry review of all trauma patients who had serum EtOH levels measured between January 2009 and June 2015. Data for each patient included: patient demographics, BAC determinations (g/dL), injury mechanism/severity information (ISS), hematologic parameters included in a CBC (hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell [WBC] count, and platelet count), and CSC panel components (sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen [BUN], creatinine, glucose, and hepatic function tests). Laboratory markers were contrasted across predefined categories of BAC: <0.10%, 10%-15%, 15%-20%, and >20%. Statistical comparisons were performed using SPSS 18 Software, employing analysis-of-covariance with adjustments performed for the patient demographics and injury characteristics. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.005.

Results

A total of 2167 patient records were analyzed. After adjusting for patient age, gender, and ISS, increasing BAC correlated with 4.8% increase in hemoglobin and 32.5% higher hematocrit (both P < 0.001), as well as a 27.8% decrease in WBC count. There were also statistically significant differences between low (<0.10%) and high (>0.20%) BAC groups across multiple CSC parameters, with largest impact on BUN (32.2% decrease); creatinine (31.5% decrease); and glucose (13.6% decrease) values. Elevated BAC (>0.20 g/dL) was also associated with 81.8% increase in total bilirubin, and hepatic transaminases were elevated among patients with BAC >0.10.

Conclusion

Due to the paucity of literature relating to the effects of BAC on serum hematologic and biochemical markers in acute trauma, this study provides a foundation for further exploration of these relationships and their clinical impact. More specifically, we found that BAC levels significantly influenced key laboratory markers, suggesting that acute EtOH intoxication may lead to hematologic and CSC changes that are potentially important in acute trauma management by frontline clinical staff.

Perioperative alcohol cessation intervention for postoperative complications

BACKGROUND

Risky consumption of alcohol is a global problem. More than 3.3 million deaths annually are associated with risky use of alcohol, and global alcohol consumption continues to increase. People who have high alcohol consumption often require planned and emergency surgical procedures.Risky drinking is associated with increased postoperative complications such as infections, cardiopulmonary complications, and bleeding episodes. Alcohol causes disorders of the liver, pancreas, and nervous system. Stopping consumption of alcohol can normalize these organ systems to some degree and may reduce the occurrence of complications after surgery.This review was first published in 2012 and was updated in 2018.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of perioperative alcohol cessation interventions on rates of postoperative complications and alcohol consumption.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up until 21 September 2018: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase; CINAHL via EBSCOhost; and two trials registers. We scanned the reference lists and citations of included trials and any identified relevant systematic reviews for further references to additional trials. When necessary, we contacted trial authors to ask for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of perioperative alcohol cessation interventions on postoperative complications and alcohol consumption. We included participants with risky consumption of alcohol who were undergoing all types of elective or acute surgical procedures under general or regional anaesthesia or sedation, who were offered a perioperative alcohol cessation intervention or no intervention.We defined 'risky drinking' as alcohol consumption equivalent to more than 3 alcoholic units (AU)/d or 21 AU/week (with 1 AU containing 12 grams of ethanol) with or without symptoms of alcohol abuse or dependency. This corresponds to the amount of alcohol associated with increased postoperative complication rates in most clinical studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used guidance provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We presented main outcomes as dichotomous variables in a meta-analysis. When data were available, we conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore the risk of bias. Primary outcome measures were postoperative complications and in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were successful quitting at the end of the programme, postoperative alcohol use, and length of hospital stay. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in this updated review one new study (70 participants), resulting in a total of three RCTs (140 participants who drank 3 to 40 AU/d). All three studies were of moderate to good quality. All studies evaluated the effects of intensive alcohol cessation interventions, including pharmacological strategies for alcohol withdrawal symptoms, patient education, and relapse prophylaxis. We identified one ongoing study.Overall, 53 of the 122 participants from three studies who underwent surgery developed any type of postoperative complication that required treatment. Of 61 participants in the intervention groups, 20 had complications, compared with 33 of 61 participants in the control groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 0.96). Results show differences between the three clinical studies regarding outcome measurement and intensity of the interventions. However, all alcohol cessation programmes were intensive and included pharmacological therapy. The overall quality of evidence for this outcome is moderate.In-hospital and 30-day postoperative mortality rates were low in the three studies. Researchers reported one death among 61 participants in the intervention groups, and three deaths among 61 participants in the control groups (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.07 to 2.96). The quality of evidence for this outcome is low.Investigators describe more successful quitters at the end of the intervention programme than among controls. Forty-one out of 70 participants in the intervention groups successfully quit drinking compared with only five out of 70 participants in the control groups (RR 8.22, 95% CI 1.67 to 40.44). The quality of evidence for this outcome is moderate.All three studies reported postoperative alcohol consumption (grams of alcohol/week) at the end of the programme as median and range values; therefore it was not possible to estimate the mean and the standard deviation (SD). We performed no meta-analysis. All three studies reported length of stay, and none of these studies described a significant difference in length of stay. Data were insufficient for review authors to perform a meta-analysis. No studies reported on the prevalence of participants without risky drinking in the longer term.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review assessed the efficacy of perioperative alcohol cessation interventions for postoperative complications and alcohol consumption. All three studies showed a significant reduction in the number of participants who quit drinking alcohol during the intervention period. Intensive alcohol cessation interventions offered for four to eight weeks to participants undergoing all types of surgical procedures to achieve complete alcohol cessation before surgery probably reduced the number of postoperative complications. Data were insufficient for review authors to assess their effects on postoperative mortality. No studies reported an effect on length of stay, and no studies addressed the prevalence of risky drinking in the longer term.Included studies were few and reported small sample sizes; therefore one should be careful about drawing firm conclusions based on these study results. All three studies were conducted in Denmark, and most participants were men. The included participants may represent a selective group, as they could have been more motivated and/or more interested in participating in clinical research or otherwise different, and effects may have been overestimated for both intervention and control groups in these studies. Trial results indicate that these studies are difficult to perform, that strong research competencies are necessary for future studies, and that further evaluation of perioperative alcohol cessation interventions in high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed. Once published and assessed, the one 'ongoing' study identified may alter the conclusions of this review.

Postoperative delirium in patients with history of alcohol abuse

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative delirium (POD) is an acute confusional state characterized by changes in consciousness and cognition, which may be fluctuating, developing in a small period of time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between alcohol abuse and the development of POD.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated consecutively all postoperative patients admitted in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit over a 1-month period for delirium, using the Portuguese versions of the the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale. Before surgery, alcohol consumption was inquired and alcohol abuse was assessed by the CAGE (Cutting Down, Annoyance, Guilt and Eye-opener) questionnaire; a score ≥2 defined alcohol abuse. Fischer exact test or chi-square was applied for comparisons. Risk factors were analyzed in a multivariate analysis using a logistic regression with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-one patients were enrolled. Delirium was seen in 11% patients. The incidence of alcohol abuse was 10%. Patients with alcohol abuse were more frequently men (P<.001) and had a higher ASA physical status III/IV (P=.021). POD was more frequent in patients with alcohol abuse (30% vs. 9%; P=.002). Age (OR: 5.9; 95%CI: 2.2-15.9; P<.001 for patients ≥65years), ASA physical statusIII/IV (OR: 4.2; 95%CI: 1.7-10.7; P=.002) and alcohol abuse (OR: 4.2; 95%CI: 1.4-12.9; P=.013) were found to be independent predictors for POD.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients, higher ASA physical status and alcohol abuse were more frequent in patients with POD. Alcohol abuse was considered an independent risk factor for POD.

Alcohol Consumption Increases Post-Operative Infection but Not Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Alcohol consumption causes multiple comorbidities with potentially negative outcome after operations. The aims are to study the association between alcohol consumption and post-operative non-surgical site infections and mortality and to determine the impact of peri-operative interventions.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched systematically. Observational studies reporting patients with a defined amount of alcohol consumption and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at reducing outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were performed separately for observational studies and RCTs.

RESULTS

Thirteen observational studies and five RCTs were identified. Meta-analyses of observational studies showed more infections in those consuming more than two units of alcohol per day compared with drinking less in both unadjusted and adjusted data. No association between alcohol consumption and mortality was found. Meta-analyses of RCTs showed that interventions reduce infections but not mortality in patients with alcohol abuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Consumption of more than two units of alcohol per day increases post-operative non-surgical site infections. Alcohol-refraining interventions in patients with high daily alcohol consumption appear to reduce infections. The impact in patients with lesser intake is unknown. Further studies are needed.

Alcohol drinking does not affect postoperative surgical site infection or anastomotic leakage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Alcohol abuse appears to increase postoperative complications, but clinical trials have reported conflicting results. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to clarify how alcohol drinking affects postoperative surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage and to determine the impact of perioperative alcohol intervention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Observational studies assessing surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage for alcohol drinkers and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying perioperative alcohol interventions were included. Meta-analyses were performed with random effects models. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane methodology.

RESULTS

Fifteen observational studies and 2 RCTs were identified. Meta-analyses were performed for alcohol drinkers vs nondrinkers and moderate drinkers (≤ 2 U/day), respectively. No difference between alcohol drinkers and nondrinkers was found. When drinkers and moderate drinkers were compared, a significantly higher incidence of surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage was found in unadjusted studies. In the meta-analysis of studies adjusting for smoking and age, alcohol drinking did not significantly affect surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage. The RCTs did not show any effect of perioperative alcohol abstinence or pharmacological withdrawal treatment on outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol drinking is not an independent risk factor for surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage. Interventions which aim to make patients quit alcohol or treat withdrawal symptoms do not seem to affect the surgical outcomes of interest.

Another 'soberade' on the market: does Outox keep its promise?

OBJECTIVE

Several products are being widely promoted for reduction of the concentration of alcohol in the human body. One of these preparations, the fructose soft drink Outox, claims to noticeably increase the alcohol elimination rate (beta 60). Theories to explain this 'fructose effect' are based on the assumption that NAD+, the coenzyme for alcohol dehydrogenase, is regenerated faster in the presence of fructose.

METHOD

A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study was performed with 30 volunteers in two drinking sessions each. Under strictly identical conditions, the same amount of alcohol was consumed, followed by the consumption of either 250 ml Outox or 250 ml placebo. Periodical measurements of blood (BAC), breath (BrAC) and urine alcohol concentration (UAC) were performed.

RESULTS

Analyses revealed a significant difference (P<0.0001) between the mean alcohol levels of the Outox and the placebo drinking sessions. The overall mean BAC difference was 0.077 g/l (BAC 0.748 g/l without vs 0.671 g/l with Outox), equivalent to 10.3%. The mean BrAC difference was 0.045 mg/l (BrAC 0.314 mg/l without vs 0.269 mg/l with Outox), equivalent to 14.3%. Differences were lower for women than for men. A significant difference between the alcohol elimination rates (beta 60) was not found.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the soft drink Outox may decrease the alcohol concentration by about 10%. However, BAC and BrAC differences are rather a consequence of slower gastric absorption of alcohol, because Outox does not increase the alcohol elimination rate. Our study demonstrates that the claim of Outox or other fructose drinks to work as a 'soberade' cannot be proven from a scientific point of view. It should be the task of physicians to warn potential consumers, especially in connection with drinking and driving.

Learning by doing: a novel approach to improving general practitioners' diagnostic skills for common mental disorders

INTRODUCTION

Two strategies have been proposed to increase the rather low recognition rate of common mental disorders in primary care: (1) the use of screening instruments and (2) extensive psychiatric training for general practitioners. We have chosen a "middle-of-the-road" approach to teach general practitioners by means of a time-saving psychiatric training programme how to make their own psychiatric diagnoses. This pilot study aimed at assessing the acceptance of this programme, its impact on general practitioners' knowledge of 12 ICD-10 disorders - depressive, anxiety and alcohol-related disorders - and the short-term persistence of the knowledge acquired.

METHODS

The training programme consisted of two 3-hour sessions four weeks apart. An educational instrument, a short interview named TRIPS (Training for Interactive Psychiatric Screening), a shortened and adapted form of PRIME-MD, was used to train single-handed general practitioners in Vienna, Austria. TRIPS had to be used by the participants in daily practice in between sessions. Five weeks after the second training session a follow-up evaluation was held to assess the persistence of the knowledge acquired. The perceived usefulness of TRIPS was assessed by a short questionnaire. Knowledge was assessed by a separate 15-item questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 31 participating general practitioners 26 attended all three sessions. There was a significant increase in the mean number of correctly answered questions between baseline (5.5 of 15) and session two (9.8; p<0.0001), and a further increase between the second and the follow-up session (11.3; p<0.05). Also, general practitioners rated TRIPS as a practical and useful tool for family practice and stated that its use met with patients' approval.

CONCLUSION

The format chosen was successful in its intended educational endpoints. According to participants TRIPS is appropriate for the family practice situation and is accepted by patients.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome: Turning minor injuries into a major problem

BACKGROUND

Abrupt cessation of chronic drinking patterns places hospitalized patients at risk for alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of AWS on length of stay, morbidity, mortality, and cost in low injury acuity trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the National Trauma Registry of the American College of Surgeons database from July 1999 to February 2004 was performed. All patients 15 years or older admitted to our Level I trauma center with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) <16 were included. AWS patients were compared with those without AWS. Demographics, mechanism of injury (MOI), ISS, revised trauma score, Glasgow Coma score, hospital course, morbidity, requirement of additional procedures, mortality, and cost were compared. Analysis was done with chi2 test and Student's t test. A p value of < or =0.05 determined significance.

RESULTS

Of 6,431 patients, 55 (0.9%) developed AWS. AWS patients were likely men (p < 0.001); had a higher ISS (p = 0.001) and lower Glasgow Coma score (p = 0.01); had more ventilator days (p = 0.008), intensive care unit days (p < 0.0001), and hospital days (p < 0.0001); suffered more complications, including respiratory failure (p < 0.0001), pneumonia (p < 0.0001), urinary tract infection (p = 0.0005), sepsis (p < 0.0001), tracheostomy (p < 0.0001), and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (p < 0.0001); and had higher cost (p < 0.0001). Mortality was similar (p = 0.38) among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low injury acuity patients with AWS have increased morbidity, leading to increased hospital stay and cost. To allow minor injuries to remain minor problems, the best modality to identify patients at risk and to achieve AWS prophylaxis require further investigation.

[Alcohol use disorder: risks in anesthesia and intensive care medicine]

Approximately 20% of medical and surgical patients in hospital have an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Diagnosis of chronic alcohol abuse is performed by specific medical history, examination and validated tests. Biomarkers are a means of diagnosing chronic alcoholism in sedated, intubated and emergency patients. Chronic alcohol consumption damages the central nervous and cardiovascular system, the liver and the immune system. In medical ICUs more than 50% of liver injuries and chronic pancreatitis are due to chronic alcohol abuse. The alcohol withdrawal syndrome is emerging in 25% of AUD patients in intensive care after reduction of sedative drugs. Long term alcohol abuse also leads to cardiac arrhythmias, dilatative cardiomyopathy and hypotonic circulatory dysregulation. Bleeding complications are two-fold increased during and after surgery. Immune suppression results in an increased incidence of infectious complications like pneumonia, wound infection and urinary tract infection. In particular, septic encephalopathy is often misinterpreted as alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Due to the fact that AUD patients show a two to five-fold higher rate of postoperative complications they require increased attention to avoid latency of treatment and the development of multiple organ failure. Prophylaxis in terms of drug therapy or abstinence intervals and brief intervention strategies can help to prevent or ease some of these complications and can decrease the rate of long-term injuries.