Individual NSAIDs and upper gastrointestinal complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (the SOS project)

Dihydromyricetin attenuates intervertebral disc degeneration by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation via the Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a highly prevalent chronic degenerative condition that significantly compromises patients' quality of life. Currently employed clinical treatments include surgical intervention and symptom management strategies; however, effective pharmacological strategies are lacking. Dihydromyricetin (DHM) has remarkable anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties. On the basis of these biological characteristics, we hypothesized that DHM might have therapeutic potential in IVDD through its anti-inflammatory effects. Network pharmacology analysis revealed 130 overlapping targets between DHM and IVDD, with the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1)/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) signaling pathway emerging as a crucial regulatory axis. Experimental validation demonstrated that DHM treatment significantly ameliorated LSI-induced disc degeneration, as evidenced by reduced histopathological scores, upregulated expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. In vitro studies revealed that DHM effectively inhibited IL-1β-induced NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation and pyroptosis by decreasing Keap1 expression and activating the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Specific silencing of Nrf2 significantly attenuated the protective effects of DHM, further confirming the crucial role of the Keap1/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in the therapeutic action of DHM. Through integrated network pharmacology analysis and experimental validation, this study demonstrated for the first time that DHM alleviates IVDD by inhibiting Keap1-mediated Nrf2 degradation and activating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway to suppress NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis. Furthermore, these findings validate the therapeutic potential of natural bioactive compounds in IVDD, providing experimental evidence and a theoretical foundation for the development of novel therapeutic strategies against IVDD.

Adverse Reactions Following First-Dose Administration of Co-Crystal of Tramadol-Celecoxib Versus Tramadol Alone for Moderate-To-Severe Acute Pain

INTRODUCTION

Phase 3 clinical trials in moderate-to-severe acute pain have shown that co-crystal of tramadol-celecoxib (CTC) has improved efficacy and comparable tolerability versus immediate-release tramadol 50 mg alone, with a similar tramadol daily dose, over a 48-h treatment period. However, it is not known how first-dose tolerability compares, given that the administered dose of tramadol is higher in CTC 200 mg (88 mg) versus immediate-release tramadol 50 mg. This was explored in a post hoc analysis of a pivotal phase 3 trial.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, factorial, active- and placebo-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe acute postoperative pain (NCT03108482) and has been previously reported. This post hoc analysis evaluated the prevalence of the four most common study drug-related, opioid-associated, treatment-emergent adverse reactions reported in phase 3 CTC clinical trials: somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting. Prevalence was evaluated in 2-h intervals, up to 6 h post first dose (just before second-dose administration) of CTC 200 mg or immediate-release tramadol 50 mg p.o. Descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Each group comprised 183 participants for analysis. The proportions of patients reporting drug-related, treatment-emergent adverse reactions of somnolence, nausea, dizziness, and vomiting were similar between treatment groups at 2, 4, and 6 h following the first dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This post hoc analysis indicates that the higher dose of tramadol (88 mg) given in CTC 200 mg did not result in an increase in drug-related adverse reactions after first-dose administration, and had a similar tolerability profile, compared with immediate-release tramadol 50 mg alone (the lowest dose recommended for the management of moderate-to-severe acute pain). This is in line with earlier findings for the 48-h treatment period of this phase 3 trial and may be explained by CTC's differentiated physiochemical properties related to its co-crystal structure. These findings may have utility for practicing clinicians.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03108482.

How can you manage an indomethacin-responsive headache in someone who cannot take indomethacin?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua are rare primary headache disorders which are distinguished by an absolute response to indomethacin. As a matter of importance, no guidelines have been proposed for alternative therapeutic options in case of indomethacin intolerance. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the current findings, especially focusing on the past 18 months, in the treatment of both paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua and to provide proposed management recommendations based on summarized evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Apart from well recognized gastrolesive effects of indomethacin, a substantial number of patients may suffer from neuropsychiatric adverse reactions. Recent studies demonstrated that melatonin, which has been known for its effectiveness for hemicrania continua, is also useful for paroxysmal hemicrania. Promising nonpharmacological treatment option, which is noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation, has been shown to be beneficial for both indomethacin-responsive headache disorders allowing the reduction of indomethacin dosage. Although the data on substitutive medication choice for indomethacin are currently scarce, the most consistent results have been repeatedly achieved with acemethacin, selective COX-2 inhibitors, and anticonvulsants. However, considering the crucial role of pathophysiology, research investigating the efficacy of drugs targeting the trigemino-vascular system activation, as well as controlled trials assessing the efficacy involving the aforementioned therapeutic options are still vague.

SUMMARY

In spite of numerous reports suggesting reliable alternatives to indomethacin, the consensus on pharmacological therapy guidelines for indomethacin-responsive headache disorders has not yet been reached. Further research and agreement from the experts' standpoint are needed for an establishment of reliable treatment recommendations.

Multimorbidity and analgesic-related harms: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is the presence of two or more long-term medical conditions. Chronic pain affects more than half of people with multimorbidity, and optimal treatment strategies are unknown. We aimed to quantify the risk of adverse outcomes from the following analgesics: opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gabapentinoids in adults with multimorbidity.

METHOD

The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023462592). We searched Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL for studies reporting analgesic-related harms in people with multimorbidity or the impact of multimorbidity on harms in adults exposed to analgesics. Two researchers independently screened titles/abstracts, completed full-text reviews, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Studies were synthesised narratively, grouping by analgesic class and direction of effect.

RESULTS

We screened 6690 records and 344 full texts, with 27 studies included (n=2 671 958 patients). Studies were heterogenous, with variable quality (high risk of bias, n=11). Most studies on opioids reported adverse outcomes (12/16). Opioid use compared with non-use was associated with increased mortality in adults with multimorbidity. Multimorbidity was associated with opioid overdose and death among adults prescribed opioids for pain. Half of studies of NSAIDs reported adverse outcomes (6/11) including gastrointestinal bleeding. Only one study assessed gabapentinoids which found an association with delirium and pneumonia, but not mortality in people with multimorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence of harms associated with opioids in adults with multimorbidity, including overdose and increased mortality. There is a lack of evidence on gabapentinoids. Further research is required to understand optimal analgesic management in people with multimorbidity.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL

PROSPERO (CRD42023462592).

Adverse Reactions With VEGF Inhibitors in Combination With NSAIDs: Disproportionality Analysis Using JADRE and FAERS

BACKGROUND/AIM

The concurrent use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) raises concerns regarding the increased risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to potential pharmacodynamic interactions. However, no studies have specifically addressed this issue. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the combination of these drugs increased the risk of ADRs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Disproportionality analysis was conducted on ADR reports from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) databases. The concomitant signal score and Ω shrinkage measure were used to identify safety signals associated with the drug combination. Additionally, logistic regression analysis focused on reports of ADRs related to cancer treatment and assessed the significance of the adjusted reporting odds ratio (aROR) for the interaction between these drugs.

RESULTS

Disproportionality analysis included ADR data from the JADER (n=1,509,399) and FAERS (n=38,610,433) databases. The concomitant signal score and Ω shrinkage measure identified a signal for gastrointestinal perforation in both databases. Logistic regression on cancer treatment-related ADRs (JADER: n=255,177; FAERS: n=1,167,941) showed a synergistic increase in gastrointestinal perforation risk with the drug combination [aROR for interaction term: JADER: 1.74 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.45-2.07); FAERS: 1.49 (95% CI=1.29-1.72)].

CONCLUSION

The combination of VEGF inhibitors and NSAIDs is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal perforation, a serious and potentially fatal ADR. Therefore, caution is warranted when prescribing a combination of these drugs.

Efficacy of Centella asiatica on mitigating temporomandibular pain and improving functionality: a randomized, double blind, pilot clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of Centella asiatica extract, ECa233, on alleviating pain symptoms and functional improvement of acute temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical trial was performed using 23 adults with acute TMD. They were randomly assigned into four treatment groups, an ibuprofen (positive control) group, two test groups of ECa233 each of 250 mg, and 500 mg extracts, and a placebo (negative control) group. All subjects were requested to self-administer the test/control capsules, twice a day for 14 days. The pain intensity score, range of mandibular motion and tenderness of the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) were recorded at baseline, 7- and 14-days post-treatment.

RESULTS

One week after intervention, the pain intensity score significantly decreased in participants receiving 500 mg of ECa233 (P = 0.016), as well as the placebo group (P = 0.030) but not in the other groups. Additionally, those receiving 500 mg of ECa233 displayed the highest percentage reduction in self-reported pain intensity and pain on TMJ palpation compared with the other groups (P > 0.050). On day 14, there were no significant differences observed among the evaluated parameters in the four groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The orally administered ECa233 has the potential to induce rapid, short term, dose-dependent analgesia in individuals with TMD pain. However, longer-term RCT with a larger cohort is necessary to confirm these findings.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

ECa 233 at 500 mg has the potential to induce a more rapid analgesic response in individuals with acute TMD after a 7-day period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov, the number is NCT06231212, date of registration: 30/01/2024.

Ketoprofen Lysine Salt vs. Ketoprofen Acid: Assessing the Evidence for Enhanced Safety and Efficacy

Endoscopic investigations reveal that a significant majority of individuals taking NSAIDs exhibit acute hemorrhages and mucosal erosions within the gastroduodenal lining. Ketoprofen acid (KA) is a potent NSAID with established efficacy and cardiovascular tolerability, but its gastric tolerability is a recognized limitation. To mitigate this, ketoprofen lysine salt (KLS) was developed. This review evaluates the pharmacological advantages of KLS over KA. While both KA and KLS maintain similar potency, KLS offers distinct advantages. Firstly, KLS demonstrates superior gastrointestinal protection through enhanced antioxidant properties and upregulation of mucosal defenses, as evidenced by both in vitro and in vivo studies. Secondly, KLS exhibits significantly faster absorption, leading to a more rapid onset of analgesic effects; this is attributed to its increased solubility and faster achievement of therapeutic concentrations. In essence, KLS addresses the gastric tolerability issues of KA while providing a quicker onset of action, making it a valuable alternative for patients requiring NSAID therapy, particularly those with gastric sensitivities or in need of rapid pain relief.

The adverse effects with ibuprofen after major orthopedic surgeries: A protocol for the PERISAFE randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended for pain treatment after elective hip and knee arthroplasties. However, evidence regarding the incidence of adverse effects with short-term NSAID treatment following surgery is limited. We, therefore, aim to assess the adverse effects with an eight-day postoperative treatment with ibuprofen after elective hip and knee arthroplasties.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PERISAFE is a randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded multicenter trial with 90-day and one-year follow-up. Eligible patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty are allocated 1:1 to either ibuprofen 400 mg ×3/day or identical placebo ×3/day for eight days after surgery. The primary outcome is a composite of either death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, renal failure, major bleeding, re-operation, gastrointestinal ulcer, or readmission within 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are hospital-free days within 90 days postoperatively, a composite of ibuprofen and opioid-related adverse reactions based on eight-day postoperative diary, and health related quality of life after 90 days postoperatively. A total of 2904 patients are needed to demonstrate a relative risk reduction of 33% in the placebo group, accepting a risk of type I error of 5% and type II error of 20% and a proportion of serious adverse events in the ibuprofen group of 8%. The primary analysis will be in the modified intention-to-treat population.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial is approved by the Danish Medicine Agency and the Research Ethics Committee (EU CT no. 2022-502, 502-32-00). We plan to submit for publication in a major international peer-reviewed journal and present results at scientific meetings.

Intravenously Administered Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Review

Intravenously administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute a crucial component of multimodal analgesia strategies in surgical settings. This narrative review aims to provide an up-to-date evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and clinical use of intravenous (IV) NSAIDs for perioperative pain management in adults and children. The NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) approved in Europe for the short-term symptomatic treatment of acute, moderate perioperative pain via IV infusion in adults and/or children have been influenced by US and global guidelines and practice: the drugs primarily reviewed here are ibuprofen, ketorolac, ketoprofen, naproxen, paracetamol, and acetylsalicylic acid. Furthermore, intravenous ibuprofen is authorized for the short-term symptomatic treatment of fever. In contrast to intravenous ketoprofen, intravenous ibuprofen is authorized for administration to children over 6 years of age or weighing more than 20 kg. Overall, IV ibuprofen had a more favorable profile with regard to peri- and postoperative opioid sparing and pain relief. Oral ibuprofen and IV ibuprofen have similar levels of efficacy, although IV ibuprofen has a shorter onset of action and is required in patients who are unable to take oral medications. The frequency of significant adverse events appears to be similar for ibuprofen and paracetamol. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses report that intravenous NSAIDs reduce postoperative opioid consumption by approximately 20-60%, improving pain management with fewer opioid-related side effects. In indications in infants, the choice of medication is limited, and the oral route is not always feasible; IV formulations of ibuprofen are preferred in this setting. Topics for further research should include head-to-head trials of IV NSAIDs.

Pharmacological pain management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative literature review

BACKGROUND

Pain is a major challenge for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with many people suffering chronic pain. Current RA management guidelines focus on assessing and reducing disease activity using disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Consequently, pain care is often suboptimal, with growing evidence that analgesics are widely prescribed to patients with RA, despite potential toxicities and limited evidence for efficacy. Our review provides an overview of pharmacological treatments for pain in patients with RA, summarising their efficacy and use.

FINDINGS

Thirteen systematic reviews of drug efficacy for pain in patients with RA were included in this review. These showed moderate- to high-quality evidence from clinical trials in more contemporary time-periods (mainly 1990s/2000s for synthetic DMARDs and post-2000 for biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs) that, in patients with active RA, short-term glucocorticoids and synthetic, biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have efficacy at reducing pain intensity relative to placebo. In contrast, they showed low-quality evidence from trials in more historical time-periods (mainly in the 1960s-1990s for opioids and paracetamol) that (aside from naproxen) analgesics/neuromodulators provide any improvements in pain relative to placebo, and no supportive evidence for gabapentinoids, or long-term opioids. Despite this evidence base, 21 studies of analgesic prescribing in patients with RA consistently showed substantial and sustained prescribing of analgesics, particularly opioids, with approximately one quarter and > 40% of patients receiving chronic opioid prescriptions in each year in England and North America, respectively. Whilst NSAID prescribing had fallen over time across countries, gabapentinoid prescribing in England had risen from < 1% of patients in 2004 to approximately 10% in 2020. Prescribing levels varied substantially between individual clinicians and groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with active RA, DMARDs have efficacy at reducing pain, supporting the role of treat-to-target strategies. Despite limited evidence that analgesics improve pain in patients with RA, these medicines are widely prescribed. The reasons for this are unclear. We consider that closing this evidence-to-practice gap requires qualitative research exploring the drivers of this practice, high-quality trials of analgesic efficacy in contemporary RA populations, alongside an increased focus on pain management (including pharmacological and non-pharmacological options) within RA guidelines.

Real-world evaluation of select adverse drug reactions and healthcare utilization associated with parenteral Ibuprofen and ketorolac in adult and pediatric patients

Introduction

Intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in healthcare settings, but their comparative safety and resource utilization impacts remain understudied. This study aimed to compare adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between patients receiving IV-ibuprofen versus IV/IM ketorolac.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal analysis was conducted using an all-payer database, examining records from January 1, 2014, to June 3, 2023. The study included both adult (≥18 years) and pediatric (<18 years) populations who received one or more doses of either medication. Propensity score matching was applied to both populations, and HCRU was tracked for 29 days post-final dose. The adult cohort included 31,046 IV-ibuprofen and 124,184 ketorolac records, while the pediatric cohort had 5,579 patients per treatment arm.

Results

Both adult and pediatric patients receiving IV-ibuprofen demonstrated lower ADR incidence and reduced HCRU compared to those receiving ketorolac.

Discussion

The findings suggest IV-ibuprofen may be a safer alternative to ketorolac, potentially improving patient care outcomes while reducing healthcare system burden. These results have implications for clinical practice and healthcare resource management.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Diseases in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Nationwide, Register-Based Cohort Study

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a group of rare genetic disorders most commonly caused by reduced amount of biologically normal collagen type I, a structural component of the gastrointestinal tract and abdominal wall. The risk of gastrointestinal (GI) disease in individuals with OI is not well understood, despite GI complaints being frequently reported by the OI population. To investigate the risk of GI diseases in individuals with OI. A Danish nationwide register-based cohort study utilizing data from the Danish National Patient Register and the Danish National Prescription Register. All individuals registered with an OI diagnosis in Denmark from 1995 through 2018, along with a reference population matched 1:5 based on sex, birth year, and month. Sub-hazard ratios (SHR) for peptic ulcer disease, diverticular disease, gastrointestinal cancers, intestinal obstruction with ileus, constipation, abdominal wall hernia, and other reasons for abdominal discomfort. The study included 864 individuals with OI (472 women) and 4,276 in the reference population (2,332 women). The SHR was significantly increased for ulcer (3.28 [95% CI 2.21-4.28]), constipation (2.67 [1.91-3.74]), and hernia (among women: 1.85 [1.22-2.80]). Higher SHRs were also observed for inflammatory bowel disease, biliary and pancreatic diseases, appendicitis, and unspecified abdominal pain. SHRs were not statistically significantly increased for diverticular disease, gastrointestinal cancers, intestinal obstruction with ileus, kidney stones or hemorrhoid disease. Individuals with OI have a higher risk of peptic ulcer disease, constipation, hernia among women, inflammatory bowel diseases, biliary and pancreatic diseases, appendicitis, and unspecified abdominal pain, compared with the general population.

Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Review

Importance

In the US, peptic ulcer disease affects 1% of the population and approximately 54 000 patients are admitted to the hospital annually for bleeding peptic ulcers.

Observations

Approximately 10% of patients presenting with upper abdominal pain in a primary care setting have a peptic ulcer as the cause of their symptoms. The principal causes of peptic ulcer disease are Helicobacter pylori infection, which affects approximately 42% of patients with peptic ulcer disease, and aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, which are etiologic factors in approximately 36% of people with peptic ulcer disease. Complications of peptic ulcer include bleeding (73% of patients), perforation (9% of patients), and pyloric obstruction (3% of patients). Annually, 10 000 people die of peptic ulcer disease in the US. Endoscopy definitively diagnoses peptic ulcer disease. Acid blockers, such as omeprazole, can heal peptic ulcers in approximately 80% to 100% of patients within 4 weeks, but gastric ulcers larger than 2 cm may require 8 weeks of treatment. Eradication of H pylori decreases peptic ulcer recurrence rates from approximately 50% to 60% to 0% to 2%. Discontinuing NSAIDs heals 95% of ulcers identified on endoscopy and reduces recurrence from 40% to 9%. When discontinuing an NSAID is not desirable, changing the NSAID (eg, from ketorolac to ibuprofen), adding a proton pump inhibitor such as omeprazole or lansoprazole, and eradicating H pylori with treatment such as bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline combined with omeprazole can reduce recurrence rates.

Conclusions and Relevance

Peptic ulcer disease is associated with increased hospitalization rates and mortality. Acid blocking with proton pump inhibitors, such as omeprazole or lansoprazole, is the primary treatment. Recurrence of ulcers can be prevented by eradicating H pylori if present and discontinuing aspirin or NSAIDs if applicable.

Present and Future of Pharmacological Management for Acute Moderate-to-Severe Postoperative, Traumatic, or Musculoskeletal Pain in Europe: A Narrative Review

Acute moderate-to-severe pain is common after surgery, trauma, or musculoskeletal injury, but its management remains suboptimal. Current single-agent treatments are limited by safety concerns, narrow therapeutic windows, and abuse potential, leaving substantial unmet needs. Here, we aimed to review guidelines for the management of acute moderate-to-severe post-surgical, trauma-related, or musculoskeletal pain in adults and discuss existing and potential future analgesics in this setting. We searched PubMed to identify relevant guidelines and existing analgesics for acute pain. To identify compounds in development, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register. Guidelines universally recognize the limitations of single-agent analgesics (particularly those with a single mechanism of action [MoA]) and recommend a multimodal approach as an established standard for acute pain. The benefit-risk profiles of traditional treatments, including paracetamol (acetaminophen), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, and opioids, can be improved by combining agents targeting different pain pathways. In multimodal approaches, lower doses of constituent agents can be used to achieve the same or superior analgesic effects relative to the individual agents. In some cases, novel formulations and co-crystal technology offer enhanced physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties over individual agents. Lastly, initiatives to increase patient awareness and education around pain management may improve treatment satisfaction and quality of life, and hasten recovery. In conclusion, management of acute moderate-to-severe pain remains inadequate. Multimodal analgesics may offer advantages over traditional single-agent treatments (that often have a single MoA) for acute moderate-to-severe post-surgical, trauma-related, or musculoskeletal pain in adults. Multimodal analgesics, combined with patient education initiatives and non-pharmacological measures, when necessary, offer promise in addressing unmet needs in this setting.

Pain management in people with inflammatory arthritis: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope

Pain is a common symptom in people with inflammatory arthritis (IA), which has far-reaching impacts on their lives. Recent electronic health record studies demonstrate that UK-based pain care in people with IA commonly involves the prescribing of long-term opioids and gabapentinoids, despite an absence of trial evidence for their efficacy. Patient surveys suggest that non-pharmacological pain management is underused. A UK-specific guideline on pain management for people with IA is required to resolve this. This scoping document outlines the context and prioritized clinical questions for the first British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guideline on pain management for people with IA. The guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on how pain can be best managed in people with IA (including its assessment, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments), ensuring that people with IA in the UK are offered evidence-based pain management strategies. The guideline is for healthcare professionals involved in the care of people with IA of all ages and genders, people with IA and their families and carers, NHS managers and healthcare commissioners, and other relevant stakeholders such as patient organizations. It will be developed using the methods outlined in the BSR's 'Creating Clinical Guidelines' protocol.

Opioid Treatment Is Associated with Recurrent Healthcare Visits, Increased Side Effects, and Pain

Introduction

Pain is a major driver of visits to the emergency department (ED). Clinicians must consider not only the efficacy of treatment options but also subsequent healthcare utilization and patient-centered outcomes such as side effects from prescribed medications. Our goal in this study was to determine whether there was an association between acute pain treatment regimen (opioids, intranasal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], or both) and unscheduled healthcare visits following ED discharge.

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis of the Acute Management of Pain from the Emergency Department (AMPED) prospective, observational cohort study. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the relationship between treatment regimen and time to first unscheduled healthcare visit. Repeated measures logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between treatment regimen and any unscheduled visits, and to evaluate whether this relationship was mediated by pain severity and/or medication side effects.

Results

Of 831 total enrolled participants, 141 (16.9%) experienced an unplanned healthcare visit within five days of ED discharge. A majority of these visits happened one day after the ED visit. Those who were treated with intranasal NSAIDs only were less likely to have an unscheduled healthcare visit compared to those who received opioids only, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 0.63. The higher odds of unscheduled healthcare visits with opioids were mediated by both the presence of side effects and higher pain levels, with AORs of 2.24 and 1.33, respectively.

Conclusion

Opioid treatment for acute pain is associated with increased unscheduled healthcare visits compared to those treated with intranasal ketorolac. This difference can be explained by higher levels of ongoing pain and greater medication side effects.

[Over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications: Focus on the management of acute pain]

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the second most widely used class of analgesics in France, after paracetamol. Some NSAIDs are available over the counter (OTC), without a prescription, on the advice of a pharmacist. NSAIDs have recently been the subject of safety alerts from France's Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), highlighting a risk of worsening certain bacterial infections. This signal has not been confirmed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) although a "risk of complications due to masking of symptoms of infection" has not been ruled out. These divergent messages can be confusing for healthcare professionals. This literature review, based on an analysis of nearly 200 scientific publications, considers the place of NSAIDs in the OTC management of migraine, tension headaches, postoperative analgesia, acute musculoskeletal and joint pain, dysmenorrhea, viral respiratory infections, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and their toxicity. The role of the pharmacist in dispensing NSAIDs without a prescription is also addressed. NSAIDs offer rapid and effective pain management in a context of increasingly challenging access to care. Their safety profile is reassuring and generally well established but could be strengthened by conducting an ad hoc study to rule on the safety signal issued by the ANSM definitively. Pharmacists have the knowledge and tools to ensure the safe dispensing and rational use of NSAIDs, with or without a prescription. The introduction of risk minimization measures, such as decision-support tools, could enable further progress in ensuring the safe dispensing of OTC NSAIDs.

NSAID: Current limits to prescription

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly prescribed to alleviate pain and inflammation in conditions like arthritis, migraines, and post-operative recovery. Their mechanism involves inhibiting prostaglandins that contribute to inflammation. NSAIDs are categorized based on their structure, selectivity for COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes, and plasma half-life. They are effective in treating osteoarthritis, spondyloarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis but might carry an elevated risk of adverse events. Despite their effectiveness, NSAIDs have limitations and risks that warrant cautious consideration. Extensive research has investigated their side effects, and this review aims to examine the current limitations of oral NSAID therapy, including safety profiles, specific scenarios where their use may not be appropriate, and gaps in knowledge. By critically evaluating these aspects, healthcare practitioners can make informed decisions about prescribing NSAIDs, optimizing patient outcomes while minimizing potential risks. This narrative review summarizes existing knowledge and underscores the importance of risk-benefit assessments in NSAID prescribing. Ultimately, the goal is to enhance the rational use of NSAIDs, maximizing benefits while mitigating adverse effects.

Excessive Self-Medication with Prescription NSAIDs: A Cross-Sectional Study in Kosovo

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used to manage pain, fever, and inflammation. Although most are usually classified as prescription-only medicines, in many countries they are frequently purchased for self-medication purposes. This study explores NSAID-usage patterns in Kosovo, aiming for a safer and more effective medicinal use. The study employed a dual approach to collect data. First, NSAID sales were analyzed in a convenience sample of ten community pharmacies across diverse regions in Kosovo in 2023. Second, data on NSAID-usage patterns and patient awareness were systematically gathered from 410 patients during routine pharmacist-patient interactions. The four most commonly purchased NSAIDs according to sales analysis were diclofenac (33.1%), ketoprofen (27.6%), ibuprofen (17.0%) and nimesulide (12.7%). A significant 74.8% of NSAIDs were bought without prescriptions, particularly among younger adults (20-39 years), who accounted for 82.8% of such purchases. The predominant reason for NSAID use was headache (43.8%). Although many of the patients suffered from occasional (33.7%) or frequent (12.6%) stomachaches and took acid-lowering medicines, the majority (85.9%) could not recall any NSAID adverse reactions. This study exposes widespread self-medication and a significant lack of awareness regarding potential risks of NSAIDs, particularly among young adults. To address these issues, it is critical to improve dispensing practices through increased pharmacist awareness and stricter law enforcement.

Self-reported gastrointestinal adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in female students with dysmenorrhoea at Makerere University: prevalence, discontinuation and associated factors. a cross sectional study

BACKGROUND

Primary dysmenorrhoea occurs in up to 50% of menstruating females. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used therapeutic remedies for dysmenorrhoea in Uganda. However, NSAIDs are associated with a 3-5 fold increase in the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse drug effects.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of self-reported NSAID-related GI adverse effects in female students who use NSAIDs in managing dysmenorrhoea-associated pain at Makerere University.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Makerere University's main campus, situated North of Kampala, Uganda.

PARTICIPANTS

314 female students pursuing an undergraduate programme at Makerere University and residing in different halls of residence and hostels.

OUTCOMES

Social demographic data, menstrual history and treatment data.

RESULTS

Overall, 314 valid responses were received from female students with a median age of 22 years (IQR: 18-29 years). The median age at menarche was 13 years (IQR: 9-18 years). 41% (n=129/314) of the respondents had used medication for dysmenorrhoea and 32% (n=41/129) of whom reported NSAID-associated GI adverse effects with nausea being the most frequently reported (44%, n=18/41)Factors independently associated with GI adverse effects were: age at menarche (p=0.026), duration of menstruation (p=0.030) and use of ibuprofen (p=0.005). Females taking ibuprofen for dysmenorrhoea were about four times as likely to have NSAID-associated GI adverse effects (adjusted OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.51 to 9.91) than those who did not receive ibuprofen. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with self-reported adverse effects of NSAIDs among the female students. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

We found a considerably high prevalence of NSAID-related GI adverse effects driven by factors such as age at menarche and ibuprofen use.

A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Nimesulide/Paracetamol Fixed-Dose Combination With Other NSAIDs in Acute Pain Management: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter, Active-Controlled Study (the SAFE-2 Study)

Objective In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination (FDC) of nimesulide (100 mg) + paracetamol (325 mg) [NP], ketorolac (10 mg) [Kt] alone, diclofenac (50 mg) + paracetamol (325 mg) [DP], and aceclofenac (100 mg) + paracetamol (325 mg) [AP] in patients with acute painful conditions. Methods This was a randomized, prospective, open-label, multicentre, active-controlled study involving patients aged ≥18 years, with acute painful conditions like low back pain, acute musculoskeletal disorders, and trauma such as tendinitis, tenosynovitis, bursitis, sprains and strains, migraine, dental pain, painful dental procedures, and post-surgical pain. Reduction in pain intensity and liver, renal, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular safety were assessed on days seven and 14. Results A total of 600 patients were randomized into NP, Kt, DP, and AP groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. NP, DP, and AP were administered twice a day while Kt was given three times a day. The reduction of pain as measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at the end of day seven was 3.75 ± 1.58 in the NP group, 2.96 ± 1.18 in the Kt group, 3.42 ± 1.42 in the DP group, and 3.47 ± 1.30 in the AP group. The pain reduction in the NP group was significantly greater (p<0.001) as compared to the Kt group and non-inferior to the DP and AP groups on days seven and 14. Non-inferiority was concluded between the NP, DP, and AP groups as the lower limit of 95% CI of the difference in the change of pain intensity on both days seven and 14 was above the predefined margin of -1.0. All the drugs were well tolerated, but a significantly greater number of adverse events were reported in the DP group (32) as compared to the NP group (14) (p<0.05). The most common adverse events reported during the study were nausea, gastritis, and abdominal pain in all four groups. There was no significant alteration in liver and renal function tests except a rise in serum creatinine in the DP group. Conclusions The FDC of nimesulide with paracetamol is superior to ketorolac and non-inferior to the FDC of diclofenac with paracetamol and aceclofenac with paracetamol in the management of pain in patients with acute painful conditions. The tolerability profile of the FDC of nimesulide with paracetamol is similar to that of ketorolac but better than diclofenac with paracetamol and aceclofenac with paracetamol combinations.

Risk factors for severe dysmenorrhea in Arab women: A focus on war displacement and mental health outcomes

Background

Dysmenorrhea is wide spread gynecological disorder among that affect the quality of life of women world wide. The current study aims to examine whether war displacement, mental health symptoms, and other clinical factors are associated with dysmenorrhea severity.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional case-control study recruiting two groups: displaced Syrian women and un-displaced local Jordanian women. Demographics and clinical details were recorded. The severity of dysmenorrhea was assessed using WaLIDD scale, the PHQ-9 scale was emplyed to assess depressive symptoms, anxiety was assessed using the GAD-7 scale, and insomnia was assessed using the ISI-A scale. Predictors of severe dysmenorrhea in females using multivariate binary logistic regression.

Results

Out of 808 of the total participants, 396 (49%) were Syrian displaced war refugees, 424 (42.5%) reported using paracetamol, 232 (23.2%) were using NSAIDs, and 257 (25.9%) using herbal remedies. Severe dysmenorrhea was associated with war displacement (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.49-3.08, p < 0.001), not using NSAIDs (OR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.91-3.95, p < 0.001), not using herbal remedies (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.13-3.60, p = 0.01), depression (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.40-3.29, p < 0.001), and insomnia (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.14-2.42, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

War displacement, type of analgesic, depression, and insomnia are risk factors for severe dysmenorrhea.

Cholinesterase inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of peptic ulcers: A self-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used with caution in adults aged 65 years and older. Their gastrointestinal adverse event risk might be further reinforced when using concomitant cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs). We aimed to investigate the association between NSAIDs and ChEI use and the risk of peptic ulcers in adults aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

Register-based self-controlled case series study including adults ≥65 years with a new prescription of ChEIs and NSAIDs, diagnosed with incident peptic ulcer in Sweden, 2007-2020. We identified persons from the Total Population Register individually linked to several nationwide registers. We estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of peptic ulcer with a conditional Poisson regression model for four mutually exclusive risk periods: use of ChEIs, NSAIDs, and the combination of ChEIs and NSAIDs, compared with the non-treatment in the same individual. Risk periods were identified based on the prescribed daily dose, extracted via a text-parsing algorithm, and a 30-day grace period.

RESULTS

Of 70,060 individuals initiating both ChEIs and NSAIDs, we identified 1500 persons with peptic ulcer (median age at peptic ulcer 80 years), of whom 58% were females. Compared with the non-treatment periods, the risk of peptic ulcer substantially increased for the combination of ChEIs and NSAIDs (IRR: 9.0, [6.8-11.8]), more than for NSAIDs alone (5.2, [4.4-6.0]). No increased risks were found for the use of ChEIs alone (1.0, [0.9-1.2]).

DISCUSSION

We found that the risk of peptic ulcer associated with the concomitant use of NSAIDs and ChEIs was over and beyond the risk associated with NSAIDs alone. Our results underscore the importance of carefully considering the risk of peptic ulcers when co-prescribing NSAIDs and ChEIs to adults aged 65 years and older.

Low Frequency of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Despite Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Corticosteroids in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease. It has been identified that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids can be essential risk factors for developing complications such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the safety profile of drugs used to treat RA focused in UGIB.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of patients with RA between 2015 and 2021, a description of the population, and an evaluation of the relationship with UGIB through bivariate analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 405 individuals, 16 presented UGIB (93.8% women, mean age was 65±13.6 years). No statistically significant differences were found regarding UGIB and medication use, except for the mean dose of corticosteroids. In the multivariate analysis, it was found that the presence of anemia in the last three months had an adjusted OR (AOR) of 16.1 (95% CI 2.74- 24.23) and higher HAQ values during the previous three months had an AOR of 6.17 (95% CI 1.79- 21.24).

CONCLUSION

This study found a low frequency of UGIB in patients with RA. More significant disability and anemia in the previous months were independently associated with UGIB. The low frequency of NSAID use in this population is noteworthy. In general, reasonable medication use related to this complication is recommended.

Reduced gastrointestinal-related hospitalisation costs following rescheduling of over-the-counter codeine-containing compound analgesics in Australia: results of a single hospital audit in South Australia

BACKGROUND

Codeine-containing compound analgesics (CCCAs) are associated with dependence and, when taken in excess, significant risks of harm. A previous audit showed significant costs related to admissions for gastrointestinal (GI) complications of CCCA. Based on this and other evidence of harm, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration changed CCCAs to prescription only in 2018.

AIMS

We aimed to identify the costs associated with codeine-related GI complications and whether the schedule change in 2018 led to a reduced clinical and financial strain on the health care system.

METHODS

We conducted an audit of GI admissions and associated costs of CCCAs at a tertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide between 2016 and 2020. Patients were grouped by 2-year time periods before (group 1) and following (group 2) schedule change. Costs for the index presentation were multiplied for subsequent presentations. Costs and outcomes were compared for groups (standard statistics; P value < 0.05 significant.) RESULTS: Three hundred forty patients (group 1, n = 164; group 2, n = 119) were identified, with the majority of these admitted due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only. For CCCAs (NSAID-containing), the same patients were admitted repeatedly with a reduction from 31 to eight admissions (P = 0.005), following rescheduling. The total cost of CCCA admissions was reduced from AU$ 561 691 for group 1 to AU$ 261 764 for group 2 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Australian rescheduling of CCCAs in 2018 resulted in a reduction in hospital admissions and costs related to GI complications. The cost savings, even in a single hospital department, were substantial.

Functional evaluation of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 gene polymorphism on ibuprofen metabolism

AIM

Ibuprofen is the most commonly used analgesic. CYP polymorphisms are mainly responsible for the differences in drug metabolism among individuals. Variations in the ability of populations to metabolize ibuprofen can lead to drug exposure events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 polymorphisms on ibuprofen metabolism in a Chinese population.

METHODS

First, 31 CYP2C19 and 12 CYP3A4 microsomal enzymes were identified using an insect expression system. Then, variants were evaluated using a mature incubation system. Moreover, ibuprofen metabolite content was determined via ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Finally, kinetic parameters of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 genotypes were determined via Michaelis-Menten curve fitting.

RESULTS

Most variants exhibited significantly altered intrinsic clearance compared to the wild type. In the CYP2C19 metabolic pathway, seven variants exhibited no significant alterations in intrinsic clearance (CLint), six variants exhibited significantly high CLint (121-291%), and the remaining 15 variants exhibited substantially reduced CLint (1-71%). In the CYP3A4 metabolic pathway, CYP3A4*30 was not detected in the metabolite content due to the absence of activity, and 10 variants exhibited significantly reduced CLint.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the kinetic characteristics of 31 CYP2C19 and 12 CYP3A4 genotypes on ibuprofen metabolism. However, further studies are needed on poor metabolizers as they are more susceptible to drug exposure. Our findings suggest that the kinetic characteristics in combination with artificial intelligence to predict the toxicity of ibuprofen and reduce any adverse drug reactions.

Development of Prediction Model Using Machine-Learning Algorithms for Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug-Induced Gastric Ulcer in Osteoarthritis Patients: Retrospective Cohort Study of a Nationwide South Korean Cohort

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are currently among the most prescribed medications worldwide to relieve pain and reduce inflammation, especially in patients suffering osteoarthritis (OA). However, NSAIDs are known to have adverse effects on the gastrointestinal system. If a gastric ulcer occurs, planned OA treatment needs to be changed, incurring additional treatment costs and causing discomfort for both patients and clinicians. Therefore, it is necessary to create a gastric ulcer prediction model that can reflect the detailed health status of each individual and to use it when making treatment plans.

Methods

Using sample cohort data from 2008 to 2013 from the National Health Insurance Service in South Korea, we developed a prediction model for NSAID-induced gastric ulcers using machine-learning algorithms and investigated new risk factors associated with medication and comorbidities.

Results

The population of the study consisted of 30,808 patients with OA who were treated with NSAIDs between 2008 and 2013. After a 2-year follow-up, these patients were divided into two groups: without gastric ulcer (n=29,579) and with gastric ulcer (n=1,229). Five machine-learning algorithms were used to develop the prediction model, and a gradient boosting machine (GBM) was selected as the model with the best performance (area under the curve, 0.896; 95% confidence interval, 0.883-0.909). The GBM identified 5 medications (loxoprofen, aceclofenac, talniflumate, meloxicam, and dexibuprofen) and 2 comorbidities (acute upper respiratory tract infection [AURI] and gastroesophageal reflux disease) as important features. AURI did not have a dose-response relationship, so it could not be interpreted as a significant risk factor even though it was initially detected as an important feature and improved the prediction performance.

Conclusions

We obtained a prediction model for NSAID-induced gastric ulcers using the GBM method. Since personal prescription period and the severity of comorbidities were considered numerically, individual patients' risk could be well reflected. The prediction model showed high performance and interpretability, so it is meaningful to both clinicians and NSAID users.

Association of CYP2C9∗3 and CYP2C8∗3 Non-Functional Alleles with Ibuprofen-Induced Upper Gastrointestinal Toxicity in a Saudi Patient

Ibuprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) widely used to alleviate pain and inflammation. Although it is generally considered safe, common adverse drug reactions of ibuprofen include stomach pain, nausea, and heartburn. It can also cause gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, especially in individuals with a history of GI ulcers or bleeding disorders. Ibuprofen is predominantly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP2C9 and CYP2C8. Individuals carrying the CYP2C9∗3 or CYP2C8∗3 non-functional alleles have reduced enzyme activities resulting in elevated ibuprofen plasma concentrations and half-life. We presented a case of a 31-year-old Saudi female patient with a history of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had taken ibuprofen at 600 mg twice daily for eight weeks. The patient presented to the emergency department with symptoms including nausea, vomiting, severe abdominal pain, and black tarry stools. An emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed on the patient, which revealed a deep bleeding ulcer measuring 1 × 1 cm in the antrum of the stomach. Laboratory investigations indicated anemia (hemoglobin: 7.21 g/dL and hematocrit: 22.40 g/dl). The patient received intravenous proton pump inhibitors and a packed red blood cell transfusion. Genetic analysis revealed that the patient was a carrier of CYP2C9∗3 and CYP2C8∗3 variant alleles, indicating that the patient is a poor metabolizer for both enzymes. The patient's symptoms improved over the subsequent days, and she was discharged with instructions to avoid NSAIDs. This is the first reported Saudi patient homozygous for CYP2C9∗3 and CYP2C8∗3 variant alleles, which led to ibuprofen-induced upper GI toxicity. This case demonstrates the importance of contemplating CYP2C9 and CYP2C8 genetic variations when administrating NSAIDs like ibuprofen. Careful assessment of the risks and benefits of NSAID therapy in each patient and consideration of alternative pain management strategies must be conducted when appropriate.

What is the most effective and safest Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for treating osteoarthritis in patients with comorbidities?

INTRODUCTION

Understanding what the most effective and safe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) is for managing osteoarthritis (OA) is complicated. OA is prevalent worldwide and people living with OA commonly have multiple comorbidities. The efficacy and safety of NSAIDs in a patient are influenced by their intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Current guidelines recommend the lowest dose for the shortest duration, monitoring patients for risk factors and comorbidities but generally do not specify, which NSAID is most suitable for a patient with specific comorbidities.

AREAS COVERED

This paper looks at the mechanism of action of all NSAIDs and reviews the current literature concerning their safety in patients with and without comorbidities. Relevant publications were identified by searching PubMed and Cochrane Library using key terms. The search was conducted from inception to 18 July 2023 and included results published before 18 July 2023. The search results and their references were then manually reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

In the paper, we determine whether the current practice of 'lowest dose for shortest duration' is in fact the best approach for prescribing NSAIDs and identify which NSAIDs are most suitable given a patient's risk factors and comorbidities. Our aim is to help guide health professionals in recommending the most suitable NSAID for each patient.

Temporomandibular disorders-review of evidence-based management and a proposed multidisciplinary care pathway

Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a prevalent but complex group of conditions that cause orofacial pain. Temporomandibular disorders are recognized as one of the most common chronic pain conditions, alongside back pain and headache disorders. Given the competing theories surrounding what causes TMDs and limited high-equality evidence on optimally treating TMDs, clinicians often encounter challenges in developing an effective management plan for patients. Furthermore, patients will often seek advice from multiple health care providers from varying specialties, seeking curative management, often resulting in inappropriate treatments and no improvement in pain symptoms. Throughout this review, we explore the existing evidence base surrounding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of TMDs. An existing United Kingdom-based multidisciplinary care pathway for the management of TMDs is described herein, highlighting the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach to patient care for TMDs.

A Case Report of Intratesticular Hematoma in a Patient with Reiter's Syndrome

We present a case of a 28-year-old male patient with a spontaneous intratesticular hematoma. He had no history of trauma but experienced sudden onset of painful swelling in his right testis. Initially, testicular malignancy was suspected. The tumor marker of testis, including alfa-fetoprotein, lactic dehydrogenase, and β-human chorionic gonadotropin, was within normal range. The patient had been diagnosed with Reiter's syndrome at the age of 20 and had been treated with sulfasalazine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen for eight years. Various imaging techniques before operation planning, including ultrasonography and computed tomography, revealed a hematoma that accounted for 32% of the testicular volume. During the waiting period before the operation, the patient was diagnosed with a hematoma and avoided a possible diagnosis of malignancy. Follow-up imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of an intratesticular hematoma that had decreased in size. Since no other related factor contributed to this hematoma, and considering the possible hematological side effects of sulfasalazine, we suggest that this may be a rare side effect of sulfasalazine. Although the patient's testis was preserved, further fertility should be observed because animal studies have reported that testicular hematoma may cause fertility changes if the initial volume occupied is over 30% of the testis.

Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Concurrent Use of NSAID and SSRI: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used over-the-counter medications that can increase the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding through antiplatelet effects and loss of GI protection. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), commonly used for mental and behavioral health, are another group of medications that can cause platelet dysfunction. Previous literature has shown a possible increased risk of GI bleeding with concurrent use of SSRIs and NSAIDs. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing NSAIDs, SSRIs, and combined SSRI/NSAIDs to assess the risk of GI bleeding.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO, KCI, and Cochrane database. All comparative studies, i.e., case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trials were included. Direct and network meta-analysis was conducted using DerSimonian-Laird approach and random effect. For binary outcomes, odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and p value were calculated.

RESULTS

After a comprehensive search through November 10th, 2021, 15 studies with 82,605 patients were identified. 11 studies reported higher rates of GI bleeds in SSRI/NSAID than SSRI users (36.9% vs 22.8%, OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.52-3.02, p < 0.001, I² = 86.1%). 10 studies compared SSRI/NSAID to NSAID users with higher rates of bleeds in SSRI/NSAID group (40.9% vs 34.2%, OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.84, p < 0.001, I² = 68.8%). The results were consistent using network meta-analysis as well.

CONCLUSION

Given higher risk of bleeding with concurrent NSAIDs and SSRIs, prescribers should exercise caution when administering NSAIDs and SSRIs concurrently especially in patients with higher risks of GI bleeding.

The Safety of Celecoxib as an Acute Treatment for Migraine: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the first-line choice for the acute treatment of migraine attacks for decades; however, the safety of a particular NSAID is related to its treatment dose, duration, and mechanism of action. Although adverse event (AE) risks differ substantially among individual migraine treatments, increased or prolonged exposure to any NSAID elevates risks and severity of AEs.

METHODS

For this narrative review, we conducted a literature search of PubMed until July 2022, focusing on the history, mechanism of action, and treatment guidelines informing the safety and efficacy of celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

RESULTS

Here we discuss the mechanisms of action of nonselective NSAIDs vs. cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, and how these mechanisms underlie the AEs associated with these treatments. We review the clinical trials that influenced the regulatory history of NSAIDs, specifically COX-2 inhibitors, the role of traditional and new formulations of NSAIDs including celecoxib oral solution, and special considerations in the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose formulations of NSAIDs, such as celecoxib oral solution, provide acute migraine analgesia with similar or fewer associated cardiovascular and gastrointestinal events than previous formulations.

Predictive value of gastrointestinal symptoms and patient risk factors for NSAID-associated gastrointestinal ulcers defined by endoscopy? Insights from a pooled analysis of two naproxen clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to treat pain and rheumatic conditions. To facilitate patient management, we determined the predictive value of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and risk factors for the development of NSAID-associated GI injuries.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from naproxen treatment arms of two identical, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trials in arthritis patients at risk of GI adverse events. Endoscopic incidence of GI ulcers at baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months was employed as a surrogate parameter for GI injury. For GI symptom analysis, Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment questionnaire was used. For GI risk factor analysis, the high risk factors: previous GI injury, concomitant selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or corticosteroids, ulcer history, concomitant low-dose aspirin, and age >65 years were employed.

RESULTS

Data of 426 naproxen patients were analyzed. Distribution of GI symptoms between patients with and without ulcer was similar; about one third of patients developing an ulcer reported no GI pain symptoms. GI symptoms experienced under naproxen treatment were thus not indicative of GI injury. The proportion of patients developing an ulcer increased with the number of risk factors present, however, about a quarter of patients without any of the analyzed risk factors still developed an ulcer.

CONCLUSION

GI symptoms and the number of risk factors are not reliable predictors of NSAID-induced GI injury to decide which patients need gastroprotection and will lead to a large group of patients with GI injuries. A preventive rather than reactive approach should be taken.

Analgesic Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen in the Treatment of Postoperative Acute Pain: A Phase III Multicenter Randomized Placebo-ControlledDouble-Blind Clinical Trial

Objective

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of different does of intravenous ibuprofen (IVIB) in the treatment of postoperative acute pain.

Methods

Patients with an intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia device after abdominal or orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into placebo, IVIB 400 mg, and IVIB 800 mg groups. The first dosage of study medicines was given intravenously 30 minutes (min) before surgery ended, followed by six hours (h) intervals for a total of eight doses following surgery. The demographic characteristics and procedure data, cumulative morphine consumption, the visual analog scale (VAS), the area under the curve (AUC) of VAS, patient satisfaction score (PSS), the rates of treatment failure (RTF), and adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse event (SAEs) were recorded during the period of trial.

Result

A total of 345 patients were enrolled in the full analysis set (FAS), and of 326 participants were valid data set (VDS). Demographic characteristics, disease features, and medical history of patients were not significantly different between groups. Total morphine consumption of the IVIB 400 mg group (11.14 ± 7.14 mg; P = 0.0011) and the IVIB 800 mg group (11.29 ± 6.45 mg; P = 0.0014) was significantly reduced compared with the placebo group (14.51 ± 9.19 mg) for 24 h postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the IVIB 400 mg and IVIB 800 mg groups (P = 0.9997). The placebo group had significantly higher VAS and the AUCs of VAS than those in the IVIB 400 mg and the IVIB 800 mg groups at rest and movement for 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the IVIB 400 mg and IVIB 800 mg groups (P > 0.05). RTF was slightly higher in the placebo group than IVIB 400 mg group and 800 mg group, and no statistical significance (P < 0.690). PSS in the IVIB 400 mg (P = 0.0092) and the IVIB 800 mg groups (P = 0.0011) was higher than the placebo group for pain management, there was also no significant difference between the IVIB 400 mg and IVIB 800 mg groups (P = 0.456). The incidence of RTF (P = 0.690) and AEs (P > 0.05) were not different among the three groups.

Conclusion

Intermittent IV administration of ibuprofen 400 mg or 800 mg within 24 h after surgery in patients undergoing abdominal and orthopedic surgery significantly decreased morphine consumption and relieved pain, without increasing the incidence of AEs.

Impact of postoperative NSAIDs (IV-PCA) use on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastrectomy for the patients of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Further data are necessary to evaluate the risk of complications associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively. This study aimed to determine the correlation between the use of NSAIDs in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study was conducted. The study population comprised 2150 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer treatment. They were divided into two groups: non-NSAIDs (n = 1215) and NSAIDs (n = 935) according to their use of the drugs. Clinicopathologic characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days, risk factors for complications, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 2150 patients, 935 (43.49%) used NSAIDs. The overall complication rate showed no significant difference between the NSAIDs and non-NSAIDs groups (22.7% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.280), while the rates of anastomotic leakage and duodenal leakage were higher in the NSAID group (2.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.002 and 1.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.007, respectively). The rates of intra-abdominal bleeding and intra-abdominal abscess were significantly higher in the NSAID group (2.1% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.005 and 1.5% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.008, respectively). However, postoperative ileus occurred more frequently in the non-NSAID group (3.0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, NSAID use was an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications (1.303 [1.042-1.629], p = 0.020). Meanwhile, the NSAID group showed no differences in overall survival at each pathological stage.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative NSAID use by IV-PCA is associated with anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, intra-abdominal bleeding, and intra-abdominal abscess in patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Caution is advised when NSAIDs are used peri-operatively.

The role of CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3 and VKORC1-1639 variants on the susceptibility of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A full case-control study

Purpose: To investigate whether interindividual variability in the CYP2C9 (*2 and *3 alleles) and VKORC1 (rs9923231) genes is associated with increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose aspirin (LDA). Methods: A full case-control study including 200 cases of patients diagnosed with UGIB and 706 controls was conducted in a Brazilian hospital complex. To perform an analysis of NSAIDs dose-effect, the defined daily dose (DDD) for NSAIDs was calculated in the 7-day etiologic window preceding the data index. Three categories of DDD, considering the genotypes of the genetic variants, were established: non-users of NSAIDs (DDD = 0), DDD ≤0.5, and DDD >0.5. Genetic variants and LDA or NSAIDs use synergism was estimated through Synergism Index (SI) and Relative Excess Risk Due To Interaction (RERI). Results: For DDDs of NSAIDs upward of 0.50, a risk of UGIB was identified in carriers of the *3 allele (OR: 15,650, 95% CI: 1.41-174.10) and in carriers of the variant homozygous genotype (TT) of rs9923231 (OR: 38,850, 95% CI: 2.70-556.00). In LDA users, the risk of UGIB was observed to be similar between carriers of the wild type homozygous genotype and carriers of the variant alleles for the CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genes. No synergism was identified. Conclusion: Our findings suggest an increased risk of UGIB in carriers of the variant allele of rs9923231 and in carriers of the *3 allele associated with doses of NSAIDs greater than 0.5. Hence, the assessment of these variants might reduce the incidence of NSAIDs-related UGIB and contribute to the safety of the NSAIDs user.

Assessment and nonsurgical management of low back pain: a narrative review

Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition that affects people of all ages and income levels worldwide. The etiology of LBP may be mechanical, neuropathic, systemic, referred visceral, or secondary to other causes. Despite numerous studies, the diagnosis and management of LBP remain challenging due to the complex biomechanics of the spine and confounding factors, such as trivial degenerative imaging findings irrelevant to symptoms and psychological and emotional factors. However, it is imperative to identify the crucial signs ("red flags") indicating a serious underlying condition. While many recent guidelines emphasize non-pharmacologic management approaches, such as education, reassurance, and physical and psychological care, as the first option, LBP patients in many countries, including South Korea, are prescribed medications. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation combined with prudent use of medications is required in patients unresponsive to first-line therapy. The development of practical guidelines apposite for South Korea is needed with multidisciplinary discussion.

Lessons from 20 years with COX-2 inhibitors: Importance of dose-response considerations and fair play in comparative trials

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) inhibit the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX), which forms prostaglandins involved in pain and inflammation. COX inhibitors have analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, but also increase risks for gastrointestinal ulcers, bleeding, and renal and cardiovascular adverse events. Identification of two isoforms of COX, COX-1 and COX-2, led to the development of selective COX-2 inhibitors, which were launched as having fewer gastrointestinal side effects since gastroprotective prostaglandins produced via COX-1 are spared. The balance between COX-1 mediated prothrombotic thromboxane and COX-2 mediated antithrombotic prostacyclin is important for thrombotic risk. An increased risk of suffering myocardial infarction and death with COX-2 inhibitor treatment is well established from clinical trials and observational research. Rofecoxib (Vioxx) was withdrawn from the market for this reason, but the equally COX-2 selective etoricoxib has replaced it in Europe but not in the United States. The "traditional" NSAID diclofenac is as COX-2 selective as celecoxib and increases cardiovascular risk dose dependently. COX inhibitor dosages should be lower in osteoarthritis than in rheumatoid arthritis. Randomized trials comparing COX-2 inhibitors with NSAIDs have exaggerated their gastrointestinal benefits by using maximal NSAID doses regardless of indication, and/or hidden the cardiovascular risk by comparing with COX-2 selective diclofenac instead of low-dose ibuprofen or naproxen. Observational studies show increased cardiovascular risks within weeks of treatment with COX-2 inhibitors and high doses of NSAIDs other than naproxen, which is the safest alternative. COX inhibitors are symptomatic drugs that should be used intermittently at the lowest effective dosage, especially among individuals with an increased cardiovascular risk.

Association of SARS-CoV-2 and Polypharmacy with Gut-Lung Axis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment

SARS-CoV-2 is a novel infectious contagion leading to COVID-19 disease. The virus has affected the lives of millions of people across the globe with a high mortality rate. It predominantly affects the lung (respiratory system), but it also affects other organs, including the cardiovascular, psychological, and gastrointestinal (GIT) systems. Moreover, elderly and comorbid patients with compromised organ functioning and pre-existing polypharmacy have worsened COVID-19-associated complications. Microbiota (MB) of the lung plays an important role in developing COVID-19. The extent of damage mainly depends on the predominance of opportunistic pathogens and, inversely, with the predominance of advantageous commensals. Changes in the gut MB are associated with a bidirectional shift in the interaction among the gut with a number of vital human organs, which leads to severe disease symptoms. This review focuses on dysbiosis in the gut-lung axis, COVID-19-induced worsening of comorbidities, and the influence of polypharmacy on MB.

The Effect of Ginger and Its Sub-Components on Pain

Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger) has long been used as an herbal medicine to treat various diseases, and its main sub-components, [6]-gingerol and [6]-shogaol, were also reported to have anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-tumor effects. However, their effects on various types of pain and their underlying mechanisms of action have not been clearly analyzed and understood yet. Thus, in this review, by analyzing 16 studies that used Z. officinale, [6]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol on mechanical, spontaneous and thermal pain, their effects and mechanisms of action have been analyzed. Pain was induced by either nerve injury or chemical injections in rodents. Nine studies analyzed the analgesic effect of Z. officinale, and four and three studies focused on [6]-gingerol and [6]-shogaol, respectively. Seven papers have demonstrated the underlying mechanism of action of their analgesic effects. Studies have focused on the spinal cord and one on the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. Involvement and change in the function of serotonergic receptors (5-HT_1A, _B, _D, and _5A), transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (pERK1/2), histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), voltage-gated sodium channel 1.8 (Na_v1.8), substance P (SP), and sciatic nerve’s morphology have been observed.

Accumulation of Deleterious Effects in Gastric Epithelial Cells and Vascular Endothelial Cells In Vitro in the Milieu of Helicobacter pylori Components, 7-Ketocholesterol and Acetylsalicylic Acid

The Gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori (HP) may influence the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). H. pylori induce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which transform cholesterol to 7-ketocholesterol (7-kCh), a CHD risk factor. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)—an Anti-aggregation drug used in CHD patients—may increase gastric bleeding and inflammation. We examined whether H. pylori driven ROS effects in the cell cultures of gastric epithelial cells (AGS) and vascular endothelial cells (HUVEC) progress in the milieu of 7-kCh and ASA. Cell cultures, exposed to 7-kCh or ASA alone or pulsed with the H. pylori antigenic complex—Glycine acid extract (GE), urease (UreA), cytotoxin associated gene A (CagA) protein or lipopolysaccharide (LPS), alone or with 7-kCh and ASA—were examined for ROS, apoptosis, cell integrity, interleukin (IL)-8, the activation of signal transducer, the activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and wound healing. ASA and 7-kCh alone, and particularly in conjunction with H. pylori components, increased the ROS level and the rate of apoptosis, which was followed by cell disintegration, the activation of STAT3, and IL-8 elevation. AGS cells were unable to undergo wound healing. The cell ROS response to H. pylori components may be elevated by 7-kCh and ASA.

Comorbidities in osteoarthritis (ComOA): a combined cross-sectional, case-control and cohort study using large electronic health records in four European countries

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the leading chronic conditions in the older population. People with OA are more likely to have one or more other chronic conditions than those without. However, the temporal associations, clusters of the comorbidities, role of analgesics and the causality and variation between populations are yet to be investigated. This paper describes the protocol of a multinational study in four European countries (UK, Netherlands, Sweden and Spain) exploring comorbidities in people with OA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multinational study will investigate (1) the temporal associations of 61 identified comorbidities with OA, (2) the clusters and trajectories of comorbidities in people with OA, (3) the role of analgesics on incidence of comorbidities in people with OA, (4) the potential biomarkers and causality between OA and the comorbidities, and (5) variations between countries.A combined case-control and cohort study will be conducted to find the temporal association of OA with the comorbidities using the national or regional health databases. Latent class analysis will be performed to identify the clusters at baseline and joint latent class analysis will be used to examine trajectories during the follow-up. A cohort study will be undertaken to evaluate the role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids and paracetamol on the incidence of comorbidities. Mendelian randomisation will be performed to investigate the potential biomarkers for causality between OA and the comorbidities using the UK Biobank and the Rotterdam Study databases. Finally, a meta-analyses will be used to examine the variations and pool the results from different countries.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research ethics was obtained according to each database requirement. Results will be disseminated through the FOREUM website, scientific meetings, publications and in partnership with patient organisations.

Development and Validation of an HPLC Method for the Determination of Meloxicam and Pantoprazole in a Combined Formulation

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most commonly prescribed anti-inflammatory drugs worldwide. The most common side effects are gastrointestinal. Pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), can be used to prevent these events from occurring. In this study, we attempt to develop and validate a novel method for determining and validating the fixed-dose combination of meloxicam and pantoprazole. A new method has been developed and validated to estimate pantoprazole and meloxicam in a fixed-dose combination using RP-HPLC. In order to separate the drugs, a mobile phase phosphate buffer/acetate was used (30:70, v/v), with a pH of 3.4 and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 25 °C. The detection wavelength for the drugs was at a wavelength of 310 nm. The retention times for meloxicam and pantoprazole were 6 and 9 min, respectively. In concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 200 mg/L, the linearity of the detector was established. The r was 0.9998 for both drugs. Recovery rates ranged from 98 to 102% on average. According to the guidelines of the International Council on Harmonization, the results were satisfactory. Using the method presented herein, the pharmaceutical formulation of the combined meloxicam and pantoprazole can be routinely tested.

Comparison of Two Different Analgesic Prescription Strategies and Healthcare Systems: Slovenia vs. the Netherlands

Background: Prescribing practice of pain medication is changing in the Netherlands; opioids are used more often instead of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therefore we aimed to compare the use of pain medication with Slovenia which has stringent prescribing rules for strong opioids.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study into national prescription databases of the Netherlands and Slovenia covering pharmacy claims between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. In the analysis about 17 million Dutch and 2 million Slovenian residents were included.

Findings: The use of opioids and NSAIDs was higher in Slovenia than in the Netherlands. More frequent use of opioids in Slovenia could be almost entirely explained by weak opioids (about 6% of the population), whereas they were prescribed 50% less frequently in the Netherlands. The opioid use has increased by about 20% in the Netherlands (4.85 and 6.00% of the population in 2013 and 2018, respectively), and the majority of this increase could be explained by strong opioids (4.05% in 2018), specifically, by oxycodone whose use increased by more than 2-fold between 2013 and 2019. In comparison, oxycodone was seldomly used in Slovenia (about 0.3% of the population received a prescription in a year).

Interpretation: When medication use is controlled by stringent prescribing rules, like for strong opioids in Slovenia, the use is lower as compared to when such rules do not exist.