Cost analysis of public health influenza vaccine clinics in Ontario

What We Know Now: An Economic Evaluation of Chickenpox Vaccination and Dose Timing Using an Agent-Based Model

OBJECTIVES

The value of chickenpox vaccination is still debated in the literature and by jurisdictions worldwide. This uncertainty is reflected in the inconsistent uptake of the vaccine, where some countries offer routine childhood immunization programs, others have targeted programs, and in many the vaccine is only privately available. Even across the countries that have universal funding for the vaccine, there is a diversity of schedules and dosing intervals. Using an agent-based model of chickenpox and shingles, we conducted an economic evaluation of chickenpox vaccination in Alberta, Canada.

METHODS

We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2 common chickenpox vaccination schedules, specifically a long dosing interval (first dose: 12 months; second dose: 4-6 years) and a short dosing interval (first dose: 12 months; second dose: 18 months).

RESULTS

The economic evaluation demonstrated a shorter dosing interval may be marginally preferred, although it consistently led to higher costs from both the societal and healthcare perspectives. We found that chickenpox vaccination would be cost-saving and highly cost-effective from the societal and healthcare perspective, assuming there was no impact on shingles.

CONCLUSION

Chickenpox vaccine was cost-effective when not considering shingles and remained so even if there was a minor increase in shingles following vaccination. However, if chickenpox vaccination did lead to a substantial increase in shingles, then chickenpox vaccination was not cost-effective from the healthcare perspective.

Review of seasonal influenza in Canada: Burden of disease and the cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines

In the 2015/16 influenza season, the Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommended vaccination with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) for infants aged 6-23 months and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVs) or QIVs in adults. The objective of this review (GSK study identifier: HO-13-14054) is to examine the epidemiology and disease burden of influenza in Canada and the economic benefits of vaccination. To inform this review, we performed a systematic literature search of relevant Canadian literature and National surveillance data. Influenza B viruses from phylogenetically-distinct lineages (B/Yamagata and B/Victoria) co-circulate in Canada, and are an important cause of influenza complications. Modeling studies, including those postdating the search suggest that switching from TIV to QIV in Canada reduces the burden of influenza and would likely be cost-effective. However, more robust real-world outcomes data is required to inform health policy decision makers on appropriate influenza vaccination strategies for Canada.

Evaluating the Impact of Pharmacies on Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Administration

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to quantify the potential retail pharmacy vaccine administration capacity and its possible impact on pandemic influenza vaccine uptake.

METHODS

We developed a discrete event simulation model by use of ExtendSim software (Imagine That Inc, San Jose, CA) to forecast the potential effect of retail pharmacy vaccine administration on total weekly vaccine administration and the time needed to reach 80% vaccination coverage with a single dose of vaccine per person.

RESULTS

Results showed that weekly national vaccine administration capacity increased to 25 million doses per week when retail pharmacist vaccination capacity was included in the model. In addition, the time to achieve 80% vaccination coverage nationally was reduced by 7 weeks, assuming high public demand for vaccination. The results for individual states varied considerably, but in 48 states the inclusion of pharmacies improved time to 80% coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacists can increase the numbers of pandemic influenza vaccine doses administered and reduce the time to achieve 80% single-dose coverage. These results support efforts to ensure pharmacist vaccinators are integrated into pandemic vaccine response planning. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:587-593).

Economic burden of seasonal influenza B in France during winter 2010-2011

Background

In France, 2–15% of the population is affected annually by influenza, which causes significant socioeconomic disruption. Nevertheless, despite its importance for policy makers, few published studies have evaluated the impact of influenza B. Therefore, we assessed the costs associated with influenza B during 2010–2011 in France.

Methods

Cases of lab-confirmed influenza B were analyzed as part of the Influenza B in General Practice Study. Cost calculations were based on micro-costing methods according to the French Health Insurance (FHI) perspective (in Euros, 2011). Costs were compared between age groups using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and when significant, by multiple comparisons based on rank. Moreover, uncertainties were assessed using one-way sensitivity and probabilistic analyses. Overall economic burden was estimated by multiplying cost per patient, flu attack rate, and the French population.

Results

A total of 201 patients were included in the study. We found that the mean cost associated with Influenza B was 72€ (SD: 205) per patient: 70€ (SD: 262) for younger children, 50€ (SD: 195) for older children, 126€ (SD: 180) for adults, and 42€ (SD: 18) for elderly. Thus, we observed significantly different costs between the distinct age groups (p<0.0001). Finally, the economic burden of influenza B for the FHI was estimated to be 145 million Euros (95% CI: 88–201).

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the important impact of influenza B and encourage further investigation on policy regarding vaccination strategies in France.

An incremental economic evaluation of targeted and universal influenza vaccination in pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy is associated with increased influenza hospitalizations and physician visits (events) in healthy women and those with co-morbidities. Annual influenza immunization is recommended for all pregnant women. Although vaccination is expected to reduce influenza-related events, the economic implications are unclear. We developed an economic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of different vaccination strategies in Nova Scotia.

METHODS

A decision tree characterized the one-year costs and consequences of targeted (pregnant women with co-morbidities only) and universal (all pregnant women) vaccination strategies relative to a no-vaccination strategy. Baseline event probabilities, vaccine effectiveness, costs and quality-of-life weights were derived from individual-level Nova Scotia administrative databases, health system sources and published reports. Sensitivity analyses tested the impact of varying key parameters, including vaccine effectiveness and mode of delivery.

RESULTS

Targeted vaccination was cost-saving relative to no vaccination when delivered by public health clinics (PHC) or routine family practitioner (FP) visit. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained by universal vaccination relative to targeted strategy was < $40,000 when delivered by PHC or routine FP visit. Net cost of universal vaccination by PHC or a routine FP visit was < $10 per pregnant woman.

CONCLUSION

Universal vaccination of pregnant women appears cost-effective when delivered by PHC or as part of a routine FP prenatal visit. Targeted vaccination of pregnant women with co-morbidities can be cost-saving, but the possibility of higher vaccine uptake with a universal compared to a targeted strategy must be considered in addition to costs in program planning.

An incremental economic evaluation of targeted and universal influenza vaccination in pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy is associated with increased influenza hospitalizations and physician visits (events) in healthy women and those with co-morbidities. Annual influenza immunization is recommended for all pregnant women. Although vaccination is expected to reduce influenza-related events, the economic implications are unclear. We developed an economic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of different vaccination strategies in Nova Scotia.

METHODS

A decision tree characterized the one-year costs and consequences of targeted (pregnant women with co-morbidities only) and universal (all pregnant women) vaccination strategies relative to a no-vaccination strategy. Baseline event probabilities, vaccine effectiveness, costs and quality-of-life weights were derived from individual-level Nova Scotia administrative databases, health system sources and published reports. Sensitivity analyses tested the impact of varying key parameters, including vaccine effectiveness and mode of delivery.

RESULTS

Targeted vaccination was cost-saving relative to no vaccination when delivered by public health clinics (PHC) or routine family practitioner (FP) visit. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained by universal vaccination relative to targeted strategy was < $40,000 when delivered by PHC or routine FP visit. Net cost of universal vaccination by PHC or a routine FP visit was < $10 per pregnant woman.

CONCLUSION

Universal vaccination of pregnant women appears cost-effective when delivered by PHC or as part of a routine FP prenatal visit. Targeted vaccination of pregnant women with co-morbidities can be cost-saving, but the possibility of higher vaccine uptake with a universal compared to a targeted strategy must be considered in addition to costs in program planning.

Preparing for an influenza pandemic: model of an immunization clinic in an urban family practice

PROBLEM ADDRESSED

The surge in patient demand for the H1N1 influenza vaccine during the 2009 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE OF THE PROGRAM

To facilitate timely delivery of the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine to a family practice population while preserving regular clinic function and to create a model of effective vaccination delivery for future outbreaks.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

An academic family practice in Toronto, Ont, adopted a process-improvement approach and implemented 3 Saturday stand-alone H1N1 vaccination clinics to accommodate increased demand for the vaccine. Medical directives were developed to give nurses the authority to vaccinate patients. Consent forms with eligibility criteria and risks versus benefits sheets were provided to patients in the waiting area to make optimal use of time. The clinic with "appointment blocks" for patients had improved efficiency (ie, fewer bottlenecks from waiting area to vaccination room), which was satisfactory to both staff and patients.

CONCLUSION

During a pandemic, when patient demand for vaccination is high, such stand-alone vaccination clinics in conjunction with family practices can deliver vaccines to patients in a timely and acceptable manner while promoting continuity of care. This model requires the commitment of extra staffing resources if regular primary care delivery is to be maintained.