Stimulation of forward locomotion by SCH-23390 and raclopride in d-amphetamine-treated rats

The role of dopaminergic transmission through D1-like and D2-like receptors in amphetamine-induced rat ultrasonic vocalizations

RATIONALE

Systemic amphetamine (AMPH) administration increases the rate of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in adult rats and preferentially enhances the 'trill' subtype; these effects of AMPH critically depend on noradrenergic transmission, but the possible contributions of dopamine are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of dopamine in 50-kHz USVs emitted drug-free and following systemic AMPH administration.

METHODS

Adult male Long-Evans rats pre-selected for high AMPH-induced calling rates were tested with AMPH (1 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (IP)) and saline following pretreatment with the following dopamine receptor antagonists: SCH 23390 (0.005-0.02 mg/kg, subcutaneous (SC)), SCH 39166 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg, SC), haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg, IP), sulpiride (20-80 mg/kg, SC), raclopride (0.1-0.5 mg/kg, SC), clozapine (4 mg/kg, SC), risperidone (0.5 mg/kg, SC), and pimozide (1 mg/kg, IP). The dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (GBR 12909 and nisoxetine, respectively) were also tested, alone and in combination.

RESULTS

SCH 23390, SCH 39166, haloperidol, and raclopride dose-dependently inhibited vocalizations under AMPH and suppressed the proportion of trill calls. Sulpiride, however, had no discernable effect on call rate or profile, even at a high dose that reduced locomotor activity. Single doses of clozapine, risperidone, and pimozide all markedly decreased calling under saline and AMPH. Finally, GBR 12909 and nisoxetine failed to promote 50-kHz USVs detectably or alter the subtype profile, when tested alone or in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of 50-kHz USVs and the call subtype profile following systemic AMPH administration depends on dopaminergic neurotransmission through D1-like and D2-like receptors. However, inhibiting dopamine and/or noradrenaline reuptake appears insufficient to induce calling.

Antidepressant-like effect of creatine in mice involves dopaminergic activation

Creatine has been shown to play a significant role in health and disease. However, studies concerning its effect on mood are scarce. This study investigated the effect of creatine (p.o.) in the tail suspension test, a predictive test of antidepressant activity. Creatine reduced the immobility time in the tail suspension test (0.1-1000 mg/kg, male and female mice), without affecting locomotor activity. Furthermore, the involvement of the dopaminergic system in creatine-induced antidepressant-like effect in male mice in the tail suspension test was investigated. The anti-immobility effect of creatine (1 mg/kg) was prevented by the pre-treatment of mice with haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.) route, non-selective dopamine receptor antagonist), (R)-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH23390; 0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneous (s.c.) route, dopamine D₁ receptor antagonist) and sulpiride (50 mg/kg, i.p., dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist). Creatine (0.01 mg/kg, sub-effective dose) in combination with sub-effective doses of (1-phenyl-7,8-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) hydrochloride (SKF38393; 0.1 mg/kg, s.c., dopamine D₁ receptor agonist), apomorphine (0.5 µg/kg, i.p., preferential dopamine D₂ receptor agonist) or bupropion (1 mg/kg, p.o., dopamine reuptake inhibitor with subtle activity on noradrenergic reuptake) reduced the immobility time in the tail suspension test as compared with either drug alone. These results indicate that the antidepressant-like effect of creatine is likely mediated by an activation of dopamine D₁ and D₂ receptors.

D2-like dopamine receptors mediate the response to amphetamine in a mouse model of ADHD

The mechanisms underlying the effects of psychostimulants in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are not well understood, but indirect evidence implicates D2 dopamine receptors. Here we dissect the components of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the hyperactive mouse mutant coloboma to identify pre- and postsynaptic elements essential for the effects of amphetamine in these mice. Amphetamine treatment reduced locomotor activity in coloboma mice, but induced a robust increase in dopamine overflow suggesting that abnormal regulation of dopamine efflux does not account for the behavioral effect. However, the D2-like dopamine receptor antagonists haloperidol and raclopride, but not the D1-like dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390, blocked the amphetamine-induced reduction in locomotor activity in coloboma mice, providing direct evidence that D2-like dopamine receptors mediate the effect of amphetamine in these mice. With the precedent established that it is possible to directly antagonize this response, this strategy should prove useful for identifying novel therapeutics in ADHD.

Risperidone reduction of amphetamine-induced self-injurious behavior in mice

The behavioral and neurochemical effects of high doses of amphetamine administered to BALB/c mice were examined in the presence and absence of co-administered haloperidol (a D2 antagonist), SCH 23390 (a D1 antagonist) and risperidone (a mixed 5-HT2/D2 antagonist). It was observed that mice displayed a dose-dependent increase in stereotypic behavior, oral dyskinesia, and self-injurious behavior (SIB) in response to amphetamine treatment. Furthermore, agents that blocked the SIB reversed the amphetamine-induced release of serotonin. This effect was unrelated to hyperthermia or non-specific sedation (as assessed by measurement of motor activity). These data are interpreted in the context of the underlying basis of murine SIB involving both dopaminergic and serotonergic activation and demonstrate the efficacy of risperidone in treating these behaviors.

A 68930 and dihydrexidine inhibit locomotor activity and d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in rats: a role of inhibitory dopamine d1/5 receptors in the prefrontal cortex?

The behavioral and biochemical effects of the full dopamine D(1/5) receptor agonists, dihydrexidine and (1R,3S)-1-aminomethyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-phenylisochroman HCl (A 68930), were examined in rats. Both A 68930 (0-4.6 mg kg(-1), s.c.) and dihydrexidine (0-8.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.) caused a dose-dependent suppression of locomotor activity, as assessed in an open-field. This locomotor suppression was dose-dependently antagonized by the selective dopamine D(1/5) receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCl (SCH 23390; 0-5.0 microg kg(-1), s.c.), but not by the selective dopamine D(2/3) receptor antagonist raclopride (0-25.0 microg kg(-1), s.c.). Furthermore, A 68930 and dihydrexidine did not cause any locomotor activity in habituated rats that displayed a very low base-line activity. Neither did A 68930 nor dihydrexidine produce any excessive stereotypies that could possibly interfere with and mask ambulatory activity. In fact, both A 68930 and dihydrexidine potently blocked hyperactivity produced by d-amphetamine (0-4.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.). Such findings traditionally would be interpreted as a sign of potential antipsychotic properties of A 68930 and dihydrexidine. Examination of neuronal activation, as indexed by the immediate early gene c-fos, showed that A 68930 and dihydrexidine caused a highly significant expression of c-fos in the medial prefrontal cortex. This c-fos expression was sensitive to treatment with SCH 23390, but not with raclopride. The effects of A 68930 and dihydrexidine on c-fos expression in caudate putamen or nucleus accumbens were less marked, or undetectable. The results indicate that stimulation of dopamine D(1/5) receptors, possibly in the medial prefrontal cortex, is associated with inhibitory actions on locomotor activity and d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity. Assuming an important role of prefrontal dopamine D(1/5) receptors in schizophrenia, such inhibitory actions of dopamine D(1/5) receptor stimulation on psychomotor activation may have interesting clinical implications in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Evidence for striatal dopaminergic overactivity in paroxysmal dystonia indicated by microinjections in a genetic rodent model

Mutant dystonic hamsters (dt(sz)), a model of primary paroxysmal dystonia, display attacks of generalized dystonia in response to mild stress in an age-dependent manner. Recent studies in dystonic hamsters have revealed decreased densities of dopamine D(1) and D(2) in the dorsal striatum. This finding has been interpreted as a down-regulation in response to enhanced dopamine release because systemic treatments with neuroleptics reduced the severity of dystonia while levodopa exerted prodystonic effects. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the effects of amphetamine as well as of selective D(1) or D(2) receptor agonists and antagonists on the severity of dystonia after systemic administrations and after microinjections into the dorsal striatum. Amphetamine and the dopamine D(2) agonist quinpirole increased the severity of dystonia after systemic and striatal injections, while the dopamine D(1) agonist SKF 38393 exerted only moderate prodystonic effects after systemic administration of a high dose but not after striatal injections. These results suggest that a predominant overstimulation of D(2) receptors is pathogenetically involved in the dystonic syndrome. Combined systemic or striatal administrations of the D(1) and D(2) receptor agonists did not reveal synergistic prodystonic effects at the examined doses. The selective D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 as well as the D(2) antagonist raclopride tended to decrease the severity of dystonia after systemic administration but failed to exert significant effects after striatal injection. The coadministration of ineffective doses of the antagonists SCH 23390 and raclopride, however, exerted an enormous antidystonic efficacy after both systemic and striatal injections. Since striatal injections of compounds which enhance dopaminergic activity aggravated dystonia, while coinjections of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor antagonists reduced the severity of dystonia, the present findings clearly support the hypothesis that striatal dopaminergic overactivity plays a crucial role for the manifestation of dystonic attacks in the hamster model of paroxysmal dystonia.

Clozapine: dopamine D1 receptor agonism in the prefrontal cortex as the code to decipher a Rosetta stone of antipsychotic drugs

A large number of ligand binding studies have shown that clozapine has a number of receptor affinities, including those of the dopamine (DA) D1 and D2 receptor families. The study of intrinsic efficacy at these receptors is less straight-forward. In the experiments summarised here, evidence is presented that clozapine behaves as an agonist at DA D1 receptors. Thus, the hypothermia produced by clozapine (2.5 mg kg(-1)) in the rat is fully antagonised by either of the selective DA D1 receptor antagonists SCH-23390 (0.1 mg kg(-1)) or NNC-687 (4 mg kg(-1)). These results provide an intriguing explanation for the clinical profile of clozapine as an atypical antipsychotic drug. Thus, there are supporting clinical and laboratory observations implicating DA D1 receptors in the prefrontal cortex in cognitive functions. Finally, clozapine displays features with regard to extrapyramidal motor mechanisms, and seizure thresholds, that could be explained by its properties as a DA D1 receptor agonist.

The involvement of noradrenergic transmission in the morphine-induced locomotor hyperactivity in mice withdrawn from repeated morphine treatment

1. Our previous studies suggest that in addition to the cerebral dopaminergic systems the noradrenergic ones have a crucial role in the morphine-induced behavioural sensitization in mice. Therefore the effects of alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan (1 and 3 mg kg(-1), i.p.) on morphine-induced locomotor hyperactivity as well as on morphine-induced changes in cerebral noradrenaline (NA) and striatal dopamine (DA) metabolism were studied in mice withdrawn for 3 days from 5 day repeated morphine treatment. The concentrations of NA, free 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethylene glycol (MOPEG), DA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), homovanillic acid (HVA), and 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) were determined. 2. Acute morphine (10 mg kg(-1), s.c.) increased locomotor activity in control and in morphine-withdrawn mice; idazoxan alone did not alter the activity. Idazoxan pretreatment did not alter the locomotor hyperactivity induced by acute morphine in control mice but potentiated it in morphine-withdrawn mice. 3. Acute morphine elevated MOPEG less but increased DOPAC and HVA more clearly in morphine-withdrawn mice than in controls, and decreased 3-MT only in controls. Idazoxan alone did not alter the NA or DA metabolite concentrations in control mice, but elevated MOPEG as well as DOPAC in morphine-withdrawn mice. 4. In control mice idazoxan enhanced acute morphine's elevating effect on MOPEG. In withdrawn mice idazoxan counteracted the tolerance so that acute morphine elevated MOPEG in these mice to about similar level as in controls. 5. Idazoxan pretreatment abolished the HVA increasing effect of acute morphine both in control and withdrawn mice. In control mice idazoxan enhanced morphine's elevating effect on DOPAC and abolished morphine's decreasing effect on 3-MT. Idazoxan did not alter morphine's effects on DOPAC or 3-MT concentrations in withdrawn mice. 6. Our results show that in morphine-withdrawn mice idazoxan pretreatment reveals the morphine-induced locomotor sensitization. This most probably occurs by overcoming the tolerance towards the acute morphine-induced increase of cerebral NA turnover and release. It is suggested that in mice the cerebral noradrenergic in addition to the dopaminergic systems are major determinants of the behavioural sensitization to morphine.