Monoclonal antibodies for human and porcine histamine N-methyltransferase (HMT) facilitate protein expression and localization studies

Novel insights on the biology and immunologic effects of histamine: A road map for allergists and mast cell biologists

Histamine (C5H9N3, molecular weight 111.15 g/mol) is a well-studied endogenous biogenic amine composed of an imidazole ring attached to an ethylamine side chain. It has a limited half-life of a few minutes within tissues and in circulation. Several cell types including mast cells (MCs), basophils, platelets, histaminergic neurons, and enterochromaffin cells produce varying amounts of histamine using histidine decarboxylase. However, only MCs and basophils have complex mechanisms to pack and store histamine in granules along with other mediators using serglycin and its carried glycosaminoglycan side chains. Relatively low granule pH (∼5.5) supports the binding of stored histamine to heparin, whereas exposure to neutral pH after degranulation weakens the binding and histamine becomes liberated. Histamine exerts multifaceted regulatory biofunctions by engaging its 4 types of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (H1R-H4R), which have different expression profiles and functions. MCs express H1R, H2R, and H4R, which gives them a dual role in histamine biology as producers and responsive target cells. Histamine plays a role in a variety of physiologic and pathologic processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, hematopoiesis, vascular permeability, embryogenesis, tissue regeneration, and wound healing. The emergence of histamine receptor-deficient mouse models and the development of multiple histamine receptor agonists and antagonists have helped researchers better understand these physiologic and pathogenic functions of histamine. We review the biology of histamine with a focus on immunologic aspects and the role of histamine in allergy and MC biology.

Histamine can be Formed and Degraded in the Human and Mouse Heart

Histamine is metabolized by several enzymes in vitro and in vivo. The relevance of this metabolism in the mammalian heart in vivo is unclear. However, histamine can exert positive inotropic effects (PIE) and positive chronotropic effects (PCE) in humans via H₂-histamine receptors. In transgenic mice (H₂-TG) that overexpress the human H₂ receptor in cardiomyocytes but not in wild-type littermate mice (WT), histamine induced PIE and PCE in isolated left or right atrial preparations. These H₂-TG were used to investigate the putative relevance of histamine degrading enzymes in the mammalian heart. Histidine, the precursor of histamine, increased force of contraction (FOC) in human atrial preparations. Moreover, histamine increased the phosphorylation state of phospholamban in human atrium. Here, we could detect histidine decarboxylase (HDC) and histamine itself in cardiomyocytes of mouse hearts. Moreover, our data indicate that histamine is subject to degradation in the mammalian heart. Inhibition of the histamine metabolizing enzymes diamine oxidase (DAO) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) shifted the concentration response curves for the PIE in H₂-TG atria to the left. Moreover, activity of histamine metabolizing enzymes was present in mouse cardiac samples as well as in human atrial samples. Thus, drugs used for other indication (e.g. antidepressants) can alter histamine levels in the heart. Our results deepen our understanding of the physiological role of histamine in the mouse and human heart. Our findings might be clinically relevant because we show enzyme targets for drugs to modify the beating rate and force of the human heart.

Mapping of the binding sites of human diamine oxidase (DAO) monoclonal antibodies

Objective

Recently we characterized five mouse monoclonal antibodies that allow the specific and sensitive detection of human diamine oxidase (DAO). To understand differences in binding characteristics and recognition of enzyme variants, we mapped the antibody binding sites.

Methods

Fragments of human DAO were expressed as glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins that were used for testing antibody binding on immunoblots. Combined information from species cross-reactivity, sequence comparison and binding site-prediction software were used to localize the epitope recognized by each antibody.

Results

All five monoclonal DAO antibodies bound to linear epitopes between the N3 and enzymatic domains of the 732 amino acid protein. The binding sites could be mapped onto amino acid regions V²⁶²-E²⁷⁸ and P²⁷⁹-R²⁸⁸, respectively, which exhibit considerable sequence variation in mammals explaining the fact that the human DAO antibodies do not cross-react with DAO from other species. The antibodies efficiently bind only denatured human DAO but not the native protein.

Conclusions

Characterization of the binding sites of the DAO antibodies revealed that the antibodies bind two adjacent epitopes and exhibit similar binding characteristics and species cross-reactivity. As the epitopes do not overlap any of the amino acid substitutions described for clinically significant DAO gene polymorphisms, our antibodies will also be useful for analyses of the mutant DAO proteins.

Histamine and Migraine

BACKGROUND

Histamine is an ancient "tissue amine" preceding multicellular organisms. In the central nervous system (CNS), its fibers originate solely from the tuberomammillary nucleus and travel throughout the brain. It is mainly responsible for wakefulness, energy homeostasis, and memory consolidation. Recently, several studies suggest a potential role of histamine in migraine pathogenesis and management.

METHODS

Narrative review of current literature regarding histamine and migraine.

RESULTS

Histamine plays a crucial role in migraine pathogenesis: sustaining the neurogenic inflammation pathway. Interaction between mast cells (MC) and calcitonin-gene related protein (CGRP) results in sensitization of trigeminal afferents and trigeminal ganglia (TG). Histamine binds with differing affinities to four different histaminergic G-protein coupled receptors, activating protein kinases, or triggering calcium release with subsequent mode of actions. Histamine 1 receptor (H₁ R) and histamine 2 receptor (H₂ R) antagonists are frequently used for the treatment of allergy and gastric acid secretion, respectively, but their antagonism is probably ineffective for migraine. Histamine 3 receptor (H₃ R) and histamine 4 receptor (H₄ R) have a threefold higher affinity than H₁ R/H₂ R for histamine and are found almost exclusively on neurons and immune tissues, respectively. H₃ R acts as an autoreceptor or as a heteroreceptor, lowering the release of histamine and other neurotransmitters. This is a potential target for anti-nociception and anti-neurogenic inflammation. To date, several small clinical trials using low dose histamine or N^α -methylhistamine have demonstrated migraine prophylactic efficacy, probably via H₃ R or other undetermined pathways.

CONCLUSION

The histamine system interacts with multiple regions in the CNS and may hypothetically modulate the migraine response. Low dose histamine may be a promising option for migraine prevention.

Mapping of the binding sites of human histamine N-methyltransferase (HNMT) monoclonal antibodies

Objective

Recently, we characterized mouse monoclonal antibodies that allow the specific and sensitive detection of human histamine N-methyltransferase (HNMT). To understand differences in binding characteristics and recognition of enzyme variants we mapped the antibody binding sites.

Methods

Fragments of human HNMT were expressed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins that were used for testing antibody binding on immunoblots. Combined information from species cross-reactivity, sequence comparison, protein structure, and binding site prediction software were used to localize the epitope recognized by each antibody.

Results

All eight monoclonal HNMT antibodies bound to linear epitopes in the C-terminal domain of the 292 amino acid protein. Of the five antibodies cross-reacting with HNMT from other species, one bound region L¹⁸²–T²²³, three region M²²⁴–E²⁶¹, and one region L²⁶²–A²⁹². All three antibodies recognising only human HNMT bound the C-terminal region L²⁶²–A²⁹² that contains residues present only in the human protein.

Conclusions

Our HNMT monoclonal antibodies bind in three different regions of the protein and those binding the same putative epitope exhibit similar binding characteristics and species cross-reactivity. Antibodies binding non-overlapping epitopes will facilitate analyses of all clinically relevant variants described for HNMT.