Quality control of involved field radiotherapy in the HD 13 and HD 14 trials : Report of the radiotherapy panel of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG)

A Quality Control Study on Involved Node Radiation Therapy in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Lymphoma Study Association/Fondazione Italiana Linfomi H10 Trial on Stages I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma: Lessons Learned

PURPOSE

Involved node radiation therapy (INRT) was introduced in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Lymphoma Study Association/Fondazione Italiana Linfomi H10 trial, a large multicenter trial in early-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of INRT in this trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective, descriptive study was initiated to evaluate INRT in a representative sample encompassing approximately 10% of all irradiated patients in the H10 trial. Sampling was stratified by academic group, year of treatment, size of the treatment center, and treatment arm, and it was done proportional to the size of the strata. The sample was completed for all patients with known recurrences to enable future research on relapse patterns. Radiation therapy principle, target volume delineation and coverage, and applied technique and dose were evaluated using the EORTC Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance platform. Each case was reviewed by 2 reviewers and, in case of disagreement also by an adjudicator for a consensus evaluation.

RESULTS

Data were retrieved for 66 of 1294 irradiated patients (5.1%). Data collection and analysis were hampered more than anticipated by changes in archiving of diagnostic imaging and treatment planning systems during the running period of the trial. A review could be performed on 61 patients. The INRT principle was applied in 86.6%. Overall, 88.5% of cases were treated according to protocol. Unacceptable variations were predominately due to geographic misses of the target volume delineations. The rate of unacceptable variations decreased during trial recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

The principle of INRT was applied in most of the reviewed patients. Almost 90% of the evaluated patients were treated according to the protocol. The present results should, however, be interpreted with caution because the number of patients evaluated was limited. Individual case reviews should be done in a prospective fashion in future trials. Radiation therapy Quality Assurance tailored to the clinical trial objectives is strongly recommended.

Radiation Therapy in the German Hodgkin Study Group HD 16 and HD 17 Trials: Quality Assurance and Dosimetric Analysis for Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Modern Era

Purpose

Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of treatment concepts for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This analysis reports on RT quality in the recent HD16 and 17 trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

Methods and Materials

All RT plans of involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) in HD 17 were requested for analysis, along with 100 and 50 involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) plans in HD 16 and 17, respectively. A structured assessment regarding field design and protocol adherence was performed by the reference radiation oncology panel of the GHSG.

Results

Overall, 100 (HD 16) and 176 (HD 17) patients were eligible for analysis. In HD 16, 84% of RT series were evaluated as correct, with significant improvement compared with the predecessor studies (P < .001). In HD 17, 76.1% of INRT cases revealed a correct RT design compared with 69.0% of IFRT-cases, which was superior to previous studies (P < .001). Comparing INRT and IFRT, we found no significant differences in the percentage of any deviation (P = .418) or major deviations (P = .466). Regarding dosimetry, INRT was accompanied by an improvement in thyroid doses. Comparing different RT techniques, we found that intensity-modulated RT showed a reduction of high doses in the lung at the expense of an increased low-dose exposure in HD 17.

Conclusions

The latest study generation of the GHSG demonstrates an improved quality in RT. A modern INRT design could be established without deterioration in quality. On a conceptual level, an individual consideration of the appropriate RT technique has to be performed.

Radiation doses to mediastinal organs at risk in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma- a risk stratified analysis of the GHSG HD17 trial

Introduction

The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD17 trial established the omission of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma being PET-negative after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated plus 2 cycles of ABVD. This patient group reveals heterogeneity in characteristics and disease extent which prompted us to perform a decisive dosimetric analysis according to GHSG risk factors. This may help to tailor RT individually balancing risks and benefits.

Methods

For quality assurance, RT-plans were requested from the treating facilities (n= 141) and analyzed centrally. Dose-volume histograms were scanned either paper-based or digitally to obtain doses to mediastinal organs. These were registered and compared according to GHSG risk factors.

Results

Overall, RT plans of 176 patients were requested, 139 of which had dosimetric information on target volumes within the mediastinum. Most of these patients were stage II (92.8%), had no B-symptoms (79.1%) and were aged < 50 years (89.9%). Risk factors were present in 8.6% (extranodal involvement), 31.7% (bulky disease), 46.0% (elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and 64.0% (three involved areas), respectively. The presence of bulky disease significantly affected the mean RT doses to the heart (p=0.005) and to the left lung (median: 11.3 Gy vs. 9.9 Gy; p=0.042) as well as V5 of the right and left lung, respectively (median right lung: 67.4% vs. 51.0%; p=0.011; median left lung: 65.9% vs. 54.2%; p=0.008). Significant differences in similar organs at risk parameters could be found between the sub-cohorts with the presence or absence of extranodal involvement, respectively. In contrast, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not deteriorate dosimetry significantly. No association of any risk factor with radiation doses to the female breast was found.

Conclusion

Pre-chemotherapy risk factors may help to predict potential RT exposure to normal organs and to critically review treatment indication. Individualized risk-benefit evaluations for patients with HL in early-stage unfavorable disease are mandatory.

Consolidative proton therapy after chemotherapy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma

Background

We investigated early outcomes for patients receiving chemotherapy followed by consolidative proton therapy (PT) for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

Patients and methods

From June 2008 through August 2015, 138 patients with HL enrolled on either IRB-approved outcomes tracking protocols or registry studies received consolidative PT. Patients were excluded due to relapsed or refractory disease. Involved-site radiotherapy field designs were used for all patients. Pediatric patients received a median dose of 21 Gy(RBE) [range 15–36 Gy(RBE)]; adult patients received a median dose of 30.6 Gy(RBE) [range, 20–45 Gy(RBE)]. Patients receiving PT were young (median age, 20 years; range 6–57). Overall, 42% were pediatric (≤18 years) and 93% were under the age of 40 years. Thirty-eight percent of patients were male and 62% female. Stage distribution included 73% with I/II and 27% with III/IV disease. Patients predominantly had mediastinal involvement (96%) and bulky disease (57%), whereas 37% had B symptoms. The median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5–92 months).

Results

The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 92% for all patients; it was 96% for adults and 87% for pediatric patients (P = 0.18). When evaluated by positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan response at the end of chemotherapy, patients with a partial response had worse 3-year progression-free survival compared with other patients (78% versus 94%; P = 0.0034). No grade 3 radiation-related toxicities have occurred to date.

Conclusion

Consolidative PT following standard chemotherapy in HL is primarily used in young patients with mediastinal and bulky disease. Early relapse-free survival rates are similar to those reported with photon radiation treatment, and no early grade 3 toxicities have been observed. Continued follow-up to assess late effects is critical.

Checkpoint inhibitors and radiation treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma : New study concepts of the German Hodgkin Study Group

BACKGROUND

Patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) have a good prognosis even in advanced stages. However, combined chemo- and radiotherapy, as the standard of care, is also associated with treatment-related toxicities such as organ damage, secondary neoplasias, infertility, or fatigue and long-term fatigue. Many patients suffer from this burden although their cHL was cured. Therefore, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies in the treatment of solid cancers and also in HL offers new options. A remarkable and durable response rate with a favorable toxicity profile was observed in heavily pretreated cHL patients.

METHODS

Planning to perform prospective randomized clinical trials in the content of radio-immune treatment in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), we transferred the results of preliminary clinical studies and basic research in clinical relevant study concepts.

RESULTS

Based on these promising early phase trial data, the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) will investigate innovative treatment regimens in upcoming phase II trials.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic efficacy and potential synergies of anti-PD1 antibodies in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy will be investigated in various settings of HL.