ArthroRad trial: multicentric prospective and randomized single-blinded trial on the effect of low-dose radiotherapy for painful osteoarthritis depending on the dose-results after 3 months' follow-up

Comparative effectiveness of kilo- and megavoltage energies in low-dose radiotherapy for painful degenerative musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the impact of different energy levels on the effectiveness of low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) for treating painful degenerative musculoskeletal diseases, as comparative efficacy data are currently lacking.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to identify studies with response information on the energy used (kilovoltage [kV] vs. megavoltage [MV]). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoint was the complete response rate (CRR). Exploratory subgroup analyses included treatment site, study period, study design, country, and dose per fraction.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies involving 12,143 patients were analyzed. Short-term follow-up (up to 6 months) showed a pooled ORR of 64% (95% CI 46-78%) for kV and of 62% (95% CI 54-70%) for MV. Long-term follow-up (at least 12 months) revealed a pooled ORR of 85% (95% CI 65-95%) for kV and of 69% (95% CI 62-75%) for MV. Subgroup analysis indicated no significant differences in ORR for energy level stratified by treatment site and other factors. Regarding dose per fraction (0.5 Gy vs. 1.0 Gy), comparable ORRs were demonstrated between the two energies. No clinical side effects were noted.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that the known effectiveness of LDRT in painful degenerative musculoskeletal disease may not depend on the energy used. Additional studies using standardized evaluation methods are warranted to establish consistency and enhance the comprehensiveness of research. Further research is also needed to explore treatment modality selection considering disease-specific biology.

Radiotherapy for painful shoulder syndrome: a retrospective evaluation

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy of low-dose radiotherapy for painful shoulder syndrome from an orthopedic perspective.

METHODS

Patients with painful shoulder syndrome were recruited for this retrospective clinical quality assessment from January 2011 to December 2017. Patients were treated with a linear accelerator or an orthovoltage device at individual doses of 0.5-1.0 Gy and total doses of 3.0-6.0 Gy. To assess response, we used the von Pannewitz score with five levels: "worsened," "unaffected," "improved," "significantly improved," and "symptom free." "Good treatment success" was defined as "significantly improved" and "symptom free." Within-group and between-group differences were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 236 recruited patients (150 women, 86 men; mean age 66.3 [range 31-96] years), 180 patients underwent radiotherapy with a linear accelerator and 56 with an orthovoltage device. Fractionation was 12 × 0.5 Gy in 120 patients, 6 × 0.5 Gy in 74, and 6 × 1 Gy in 42 patients. Treatments were completed in one series for 223 and in two series at least 6 weeks apart for 13 patients. Of the 236 patients, 163 patients (69.1%) agreed to be re-interviewed at a median of 10.5 (range 4-60) months after radiotherapy completion. Directly after radiotherapy, 30.9% (73 patients) had "good treatment success," which had increased to 55.2% (90 patients) at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Protracted pain improvement with low-dose radiotherapy is possible in painful shoulder syndrome. Patients with refractory pain because of subacromial syndrome or shoulder osteoarthritis should also be evaluated for radiotherapy.

Low-dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) in Managing Osteoarthritis: A Comprehensive Review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative arthropathy, impacting the quality of life for millions worldwide. It typically presents with chronic pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility in the affected joints. Nonsurgical treatments like physiotherapy or pharmacotherapy may provide limited relief and may have adverse effects and complications. Recently, low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) has emerged as a potential alternative for managing OA, utilizing its anti-inflammatory effects. LDRT's anti-inflammatory effects involve modulating immune responses, reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, and inducing apoptosis in inflammatory cells. Clinical studies show varying degrees of symptom relief, with some patients experiencing pain reduction and improved joint mobility while others show minimal response. The variability in LDRT treatment designs, radiation dosages, and patient populations complicates standardized treatment protocols and raises concerns about potential carcinogenic risks. Despite these issues, LDRT shows promise as an alternative to other OA treatments, especially for patients who don't respond to other treatments. This review aims to provide updated information on the effectiveness, mechanisms, and safety of LDRT in treating OA. We reviewed the literature of studies on the safety and efficacy of LDRT on affected joints by OA, its biological effects, potential therapeutic and adverse effects, application and contraindications, clinical outcomes, and clinical evidence in subjects with OA.

How Effective is Low-dose Radiotherapy (LD-RT) for Heberden's Osteoarthritis? An Analysis of the Current Literature

Low-dose radiotherapy is an established treatment option for non-malignant skeletal disorders. It is used in the treatment of Heberden's osteoarthritis (HA), but the evidence of efficacy does not seem to be certain. This paper reviews current literature for scientific evidence of efficacy in the treatment of HA.The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant publications.9 publications were identified that published data from 7 studies. Only one study was randomised, placebo-controlled and double-blinded. None of the studies exclusively investigated HA. The studies were all inhomogenous with regard to inclusion criteria, follow-up criteria, radiation mode and interpretation or treatment success. In the RCT, no difference was found between the verum and control groups.The study situation is currently weak. The researched publications are not sufficiently focused on the collective of Heberden's osteoarthritis and are generally too inhomogenous with regard to the criteria applied. Future targeted studies are therefore required to prove efficacy.

Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a common cause of pain and disability in the United States. Many patients experience pain that is refractory or unable to be treated by traditional treatments such as exercise, physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. For patients with medically refractory disease, intra-articular corticosteroid therapy, hyaluronic acid, or surgery can be considered. However, for many older patients with significant impairment in quality of life related to osteoarthritis, radiation therapy is a noninvasive treatment option that has a long history of global use. In this topic discussion, we review the clinical evidence supporting treatment of osteoarthritis, as well as considerations for how to select which patient and joint to treat. We discuss technical considerations for treatment including dose and immobilization, assessment of treatment response, and the role of retreatment.

Low-dose radiotherapy of osteoarthritis: from biological findings to clinical effects-challenges for future studies

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common and socioeconomically relevant diseases, with rising incidence and prevalence especially with regard to an ageing population in the Western world. Over the decades, the scientific perception of OA has shifted from a simple degeneration of cartilage and bone to a multifactorial disease involving various cell types and immunomodulatory factors. Despite a wide range of conventional treatment modalities available, a significant proportion of patients remain treatment refractory. Low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) has been used for decades in the treatment of patients with inflammatory and/or degenerative diseases and has proven a viable option even in cohorts of patients with a rather poor prognosis. While its justification mainly derives from a vast body of empirical evidence, prospective randomized trials have until now failed to prove the effectiveness of LDRT. Nevertheless, over the decades, adaptions of LDRT treatment modalities have evolved using lower dosages with establishment of different treatment schedules for which definitive clinical proof is still pending. Preclinical research has revealed that the immune system is modulated by LDRT and very recently osteoimmunological mechanisms have been described. Future studies and investigations further elucidating the underlying mechanisms are an essential key to clarify the optimal patient stratification and treatment procedure, considering the patients' inflammatory status, age, and sex. The present review aims not only to present clinical and preclinical knowledge about the mechanistic and beneficial effects of LDRT, but also to emphasize topics that will need to be addressed in future studies. Further, a concise overview of the current status of the underlying radiobiological knowledge of LDRT for clinicians is given, while seeking to stimulate further translational research.

Low-dose RaDiation therapy for patients with KNee osteoArthritis (LoRD-KNeA): a protocol for a sham-controlled randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) for osteoarthritis (OA) has been performed for several decades. However, supporting evidence from randomised studies using modern methodologies is lacking, and a recently published randomised study failed to show the significant benefit of LDRT. The presented trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LDRT for patients with knee OA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective, multicentre, randomised trial will be conducted in the Republic of Korea. A total of 114 participants will be randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive sham irradiation, 0.3 Gy/6 fractions of LDRT or 3 Gy/6 fractions of LDRT. Key inclusion criteria are primary knee OA with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3 and visual analogue scale 50-90 when walking at the baseline. The primary endpoint is the rate of responders at 4 months after LDRT according to the OARSI-OMERACT criteria. Concomitant use of analgesics is prohibited until the primary efficacy evaluation is scheduled.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Currently, approval from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety of the Republic of Korea and the institutional review board of each participating hospital has been obtained. Patient enrolment began in October 2022 and is ongoing at three participating sites. The results will be disseminated to academic audiences and the public via publication in an international peer-reviewed journal and presentation at conferences. This trial will provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of LDRT for patients with knee OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05562271.

Non-Oncological Radiotherapy: A Review of Modern Approaches

Despite being usually delivered in oncological patients, radiotherapy can be used as a successful treatment for several non-malignant disorders. Even though this use of radiotherapy has been scarcely investigated since the 1950s, more recent interest has actually shed the light on this approach. Thus, the aim of this narrative review is to analyze the applications of non-oncological radiotherapy in different disorders. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used. This review contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of non-oncological radiotherapy approaches. In conclusion, non-oncological radiotherapy is a safe and efficacious approach to treat several disorders that needs to be further investigated and used in clinical practice.

Prospective Evaluation of Low-Dose External Beam Radiotherapy (LD-EBRT) for Painful Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis (Rhizarthrosis) on Pain, Function, and Quality of Life to Calculate the Required Number of Patients for a Prospective Randomized Study

Background: Retrospective studies have described the effectiveness of low-dose radiotherapy (LD-EBRT) in painful arthrosis of small finger joints, but two recent prospective studies have yielded ambiguous results. To generate accurate data for the planning of a trial, we conducted a prospective, monocentric, observational study to describe the effects of LD-EBRT as precisely as possible. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients with symptomatic trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis were irradiated with 6 × 0.5 Gy. Before, 3, and 12 months after LD-EBRT, we assessed subjective endpoints (modified “von-Pannewitz score”, 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), “patient-rated wrist evaluation” (PRWE)), and objective measurements (“active range of motion” (AROM), Kapandji index, grip strength, pinch grip). Results: At 3/12 months, 80%/57% reported partial and 4%/18% complete remission according to the “von-Pannewitz” score. VAS “overall pain” significantly decreased from a median of seven (IQR 4) at baseline to three (IQR 6; p = 0.046) and to two (IQR 2; p = 0.013). Similar results were obtained for VAS “pain during exercise”, VAS “pain during daytime”, and VAS “function”. “PRWE overall score” was reduced from 0.5 at baseline (SD 0.19) to 0.36 (SD 0.24, p = 0.05) and to 0.27 (SD 0.18, p = 0.0009). We found no improvements of the objective endpoints (AROM, Kapandji, grip strength) except for flexion, which increased from 64° (SD 12°) at baseline to 73° (SD 9.7°, p = 0.046) at 12 months. Conclusions: We recommend the PRWE score as a useful endpoint for further studies for this indication. To prove a 15% superiority over sham irradiation, we calculated that 750 patients need to be prospectively randomized.