1
|
Shafan-Azhar Z, Suh JW, Delamain H, Arundell LL, Naqvi SA, Knight T, Ellard S, Pilling S, Saunders R, Buckman JEJ. Psychological Therapy Outcomes and Engagement in People of Different Religions. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8:e254026. [PMID: 40198069 PMCID: PMC11979733 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025] Open
Abstract
Importance Identifying whether people of minoritized religious identities are less likely to benefit from psychological therapy is key to tackling inequalities in mental health treatment. Objective To assess inequalities in the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapy across religious groups and by the intersections with ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study including all patients who completed a course of treatment at 5 London-based National Health Service Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (NHS TTad) services between 2011 and 2020. Individuals reported their religion using routine patient records collected by the services. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to October 2024. Exposures Self-identified religion was categorized into (1) no religion, (2) Christian, (3) Muslim, and (4) other (which was further categorized into Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, Sikh, and any other in a sensitivity analysis). Ethnicity was conceptualized as a potential confounder and separately as an effect modifier. Self-reported ethnicity was categorized based on UK Census codes into Asian, Black, mixed race, White, and other ethnic groups. Main Outcomes and Measures Psychological treatment outcomes used to assess NHS TTad services nationally, including reliable recovery, recovery, and reliable deterioration. Dropout from treatment was also examined. These outcomes were defined based on pre-post treatment changes in depression and anxiety symptom measures according to national guidelines. Results A total of 70 098 patients with data on self-reported religion were included in the study (mean [SD] age at referral, 39.2 [14.1] years; 47 797 [68.2%] female). After adjusting for sociodemographic, treatment-related, and clinical characteristics, the odds of reliable recovery were higher in patients who did not have any religious belief (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.26-1.42) or self-reported Christian (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.31-1.48) and other religion (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34) compared with Muslim patients. While treatment outcomes improved each year in all groups, Muslim patients remained least likely to improve and more likely to deteriorate. There were interactions between religion and ethnicity; in particular, Muslim patients of White or other ethnic backgrounds had worse outcomes than Muslim patients of Asian, Black, or mixed race ethnic backgrounds and compared with non-Muslim patients of those ethnicities. Conclusions and Relevance In England, patients who identified as Muslim, and particularly those of White or other ethnicities, had poorer outcomes from psychological therapies for depression and anxiety disorders than patients who reported no religion or any other religion. This may be partly due to unmeasured characteristics that warrant further investigation (eg, nationality and asylum-seeking or refugee status). Best practice guidelines on working with people of minoritized ethnicities may inform some of the changes needed to reduce inequalities, but must address religious identity separate from ethnicity, as well as their intersections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab Shafan-Azhar
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children and Young People’s Mental Health Coalition, United Kingdom
| | - Jae Won Suh
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Henry Delamain
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laura-Louise Arundell
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Ali Naqvi
- North East London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tania Knight
- Whittington Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Ellard
- Whittington Health National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Pilling
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
- North London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob Saunders
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua E. J. Buckman
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington National Health Service Talking Therapies for Anxiety and Depression Services, North London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chadd K, Caute A, Pettican A, Enderby P. Operationalising routinely collected patient data in research to further the pursuit of social justice and health equity: a team-based scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2025; 25:14. [PMID: 39838312 PMCID: PMC11749527 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-025-02466-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2025] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vast volumes of routinely collected data (RCD) about patients are collated by health professionals. Leveraging this data - a form of real-world data - can be valuable for quality improvement and contributing to the evidence-base to inform practice. Examining routine data may be especially useful for examining issues related to social justice such as health inequities. However, little is known about the extent to which RCD is utilised in health fields and published for wider dissemination. OBJECTIVES The objective of this scoping review is to document the peer-reviewed published research in allied health fields which utilise RCD and evaluate the extent to which these studies have addressed issues pertaining to social justice. METHODS An enhanced version of the Arksey and O'Malley's framework, put forth by Westphalm et al. guided the scoping review. A comprehensive literature search of three databases identified 1584 articles. Application of inclusion and exclusion criteria was piloted on 5% of the papers by three researchers. All titles and abstracts were screened independently by 2 team members, as were full texts. A data charting framework, developed to address the research questions, was piloted by three researchers with data extraction being completed by the lead researcher. A sample of papers were independently charted by a second researcher for reliability checking. RESULTS One hundred and ninety papers were included in the review. The literature was diverse in terms of the professions that were represented: physiotherapy (33.7%) and psychology/mental health professions (15.8%) predominated. Many studies were first authored by clinicians (44.2%), often with clinical-academic teams. Some (33.25%) directly referenced the use of their studies to examine translation of research to practice. Few studies (14.2%) specifically tackled issues pertaining to social justice, though many collected variables that could have been utilised for this purpose. CONCLUSION Studies operationalising RCD can meaningfully address research to practice gaps and provide new evidence about issues related to social justice. However, RCD is underutilised for these purposes. Given that vast volumes of relevant data are routinely collected, more needs to be done to leverage it, which would be supported by greater acknowledgement of the value of RCD studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Caute
- University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delamain H, Saunders R, Tanzer M, Luyten P, Fonagy P, Campbell C. Identifying subgroups of individuals based on their epistemic stance, attachment dimensions and childhood trauma: A latent profile analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2025; 181:701-708. [PMID: 39753089 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study examines the interplay between epistemic stance, attachment dimensions, and childhood trauma in relation to specific demographic factors and mental health outcomes. This study aims to understand how these factors form distinct profiles among individuals, to identify those at risk of mental health concerns. METHOD Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was employed on a dataset from the general population (n = 500) to identify subgroups of individuals based on their epistemic stance (mistrust and credulity), attachment dimensions, and childhood trauma. Group comparison tests examined differences in sociodemographic variables across the profiles, whilst linear regression analyses investigated between-profile variations in mental health and wellbeing measures. RESULTS The LPA revealed a four-profile solution as the most suitable fit for the data. The latent profiles were characterised as follows: LP1 (14% of the sample; high levels of mistrust and low scores on all other measures), LP2 (62% of the sample; average scores on all measures), LP3 (15% of the sample; highest scores on all measures), and LP4 (9% of the sample; lowest scores on all measures). Between-profile significant differences were found for relationship status and education levels. Linear regression analyses demonstrated variations across the profiles for mental health symptoms and wellbeing measures. CONCLUSIONS This study identified four distinct profiles with specific combinations of epistemic stance, attachment dimensions, and childhood trauma. These profiles were associated with differing levels of mental health symptom severity and wellbeing, suggesting their potential utility in informing preventive strategies targeting individuals at highest risk of negative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Delamain
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - R Saunders
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Tanzer
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Luyten
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Fonagy
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Campbell
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hudson BF, Taylor F, Jones R, Sagar DR, Driscoll R, Carter D, Royston S, Penny A. Intersectionality factors and equitable end-of-life experiences: rapid review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 14:e2438-e2445. [PMID: 39806578 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to minimise inequity in palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) are well-researched. This is frequently explained by differences related to singular factors. The concept of intersectionality recognises that the combination of variables exacerbates disparities. OBJECTIVE To identify and review what is known about intersectionality's impact on experiences of PEoLC, including advance care planning (ACP). METHODS A rapid review with a narrative summary of peer-reviewed articles. Six electronic databases were searched for studies explicitly exploring the role of intersectionality in the experience of PEoLC and ACP for people with life-limiting or terminal illnesses, published in the last 10 years. RESULTS Identifying eligible papers was challenging. Of the 3738 papers found, only seven were eligible. Of the seven included papers, four explored the impact of intersectionality on access to and attitudes towards ACP. Two studies involved access to PEoLC and one considered quality of care received in the last year of life. CONCLUSIONS Understanding intersectionality is crucial for delivering personalised approaches to care and support. The relationship between intersecting factors and end-of-life experiences is complex and there is currently a paucity of studies considering this. The majority of existing literature addresses a narrow range of variables. Additionally, the lack of guidance on the application of intersectionality in research, makes it difficult to compare and synthesise findings. Further diverse action-orientated research is necessary to produce impactful evidence to inform future policy with the aim of reducing inequity in PEoLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briony F Hudson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
- Marie Curie, London, UK
| | - Fiona Taylor
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Alison Penny
- National Children's Bureau, London, UK
- National Bereavement Alliance, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arundell LLC, Saunders R, Buckman JEJ, Lewis G, Stott J, Singh S, Jena R, Naqvi SA, Leibowitz J, Pilling S. Differences in psychological treatment outcomes by ethnicity and gender: an analysis of individual patient data. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2024; 59:1519-1531. [PMID: 38321296 PMCID: PMC11343885 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02610-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are discrepancies in mental health treatment outcomes between ethnic groups, which may differ between genders. NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression provide evidence-based psychological therapies for common mental disorders. This study examines the intersection between ethnicity and gender as factors associated with psychological treatment outcomes. Aims were to explore by gender: (1) differences in psychological treatment outcomes for minoritized ethnic people compared to White-British people, (2) whether differences are observed when controlling for clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with outcomes, and (3) whether organization-level factors moderate differences in outcomes between ethnic groups. METHODS Patient data from eight NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression services (n = 98,063) was used to explore associations between ethnicity and outcomes, using logistic regression. Stratified subsamples were used to separately explore factors associated with outcomes for males and females. RESULTS In adjusted analyses, Asian (OR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.78; 0.87], p < .001, 'Other' (OR = 0.79 [95%CI 0.72-0.87], p < .001) and White-other (0.93 [95%CI 0.89-0.97], p < .001) ethnic groups were less likely to reliably recover than White-British people. Asian (OR = 1.48 [95% CI 1.35-1.62], p < .001), Mixed (OR = 1.18 [95% CI 1.05-1.34], p = .008), 'Other' (OR = 1.60 [95% CI 1.38-1.84], p < .001) and White-other (OR = 1.18 [95% CI 1.09-1.28], p < .001) groups were more likely to experience a reliable deterioration in symptoms. Poorer outcomes for these groups were consistent across genders. There was some evidence of interactions between ethnic groups and organization-level factors impacting outcomes, but findings were limited. CONCLUSIONS Across genders, Asian, 'Other' and White-other groups experienced worse treatment outcomes across several measures in adjusted models. Reducing waiting times or offering more treatment sessions might lead to increased engagement and reduced drop-out for some patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Louise C Arundell
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK.
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.
| | - Rob Saunders
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Joshua E J Buckman
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
- iCope, Camden and Islington Psychological Therapies Services, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Glyn Lewis
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
- ADAPT Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Satwant Singh
- Waltham Forest Talking Therapies, North-East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Renuka Jena
- Waltham Forest Talking Therapies, North-East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Judy Leibowitz
- iCope, Camden and Islington Psychological Therapies Services, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- CORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK
- iCope, Camden and Islington Psychological Therapies Services, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chadd K, Caute A, Pettican A, Enderby P. Methods to advance health equity and social justice in healthcare: Protocol for a scoping review on the utilisation of routinely collected data. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0306786. [PMID: 38985705 PMCID: PMC11236175 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many areas of healthcare are impacted by a paucity of research that is translatable to clinical practice. Research utilising real-world data, such as routinely collected patient data, may be one option to efficiently create evidence to inform practice and service delivery. Such studies are also valuable for exploring (in)equity of services and outcomes, and benefit from using non-selected samples representing the diversity of the populations served in the 'real world'. This scoping review aims to identify and map the published research which utilises routinely collected clinical healthcare data. A secondary aim is to explore the extent to which this literature supports the pursuit of social justice in health, including health inequities and intersectional approaches. METHOD This review utilises Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework for scoping reviews and draws on the recommended enhancements of this framework to promote a team-based and mixed methods approach. This includes searching electronic databases and screening papers based on a pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data relevant to the research aims will be extracted from included papers, including the clinical/professional area of the topic, the source of data that was used, and whether it addresses elements of social justice. All screening and reviewing will be collaborative and iterative, drawing on strengths of the research team and responsive changes to challenges will be made. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, and conceptual content analysis will be utilised to understand qualitative data. These will be collectively synthesised in alignment to the research aims. CONCLUSION Our findings will highlight the extent to which such research is being conducted and published, including gaps and make recommendations for future endeavours for real-world data studies. The findings from this scoping review will be relevant for practitioners and researchers, as well as health service managers, commissioners, and research funders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Chadd
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Essex, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Caute
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Essex, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Pettican
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Essex, United Kingdom
| | - Pam Enderby
- Division of Public Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kiærbech H, Broderstad AR, Silviken A, Lorem GF, Kristiansen RE, Spein AR. The association of religious factors with mental health-service utilisation and satisfaction in a mixed Sámi and Norwegian adult population: Adopting the SAMINOR 2 Questionnaire Survey. Int J Circumpolar Health 2023; 82:2223422. [PMID: 37331011 DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2023.2223422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The Indigenous Sámi have poorer mental health than the majority population and fairly equal access to professional mental healthcare. Despite this condition, certain studies indicate that this group is underrepresented among the users of such services. Religion or spirituality (R/S) often influences mental health-service utilisation and satisfaction among other Indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities. Thus, this study examines the situation in Sámi-Norwegian areas. We utilised cross-sectional data from the population-based SAMINOR 2 Questionnaire Survey (2012; subsample n = 2,364; 71% non-Sámi) in mixed Sámi-Norwegian regions of Northern and Central Norway. We analysed the associations between R/S factors and past-year mental health-service utilisation and satisfaction among individuals reporting mental health problems, substance use, or addictive behaviours. Multivariable-adjusted regression models considering sociodemographic factors, including Sámi ethnicity, were applied. Religious attendance was significantly associated with infrequent past-year use of mental health services (OR = 0.77) and fewer mental health problems, indicating that the R/S fellowship may buffer mental distress and represent an alternative psychological support to professional services. R/S was not significantly associated with lifetime mental health-service satisfaction. We found no ethnic differences in service utilisation or satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Kiærbech
- Mental Health and Addiction Clinic, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway
- Mental Health and Addiction Clinic, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Alta, Norway
| | - Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
- Centre for Sámi Health Research, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anne Silviken
- Centre for Sámi Health Research, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway
- Sámi Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Mental Health and Substance Use (SANKS), Finnmark Hospital Trust, Karasjok, Norway
| | | | - Roald E Kristiansen
- Department of Archaeology, History, Religious Studies, and Theology, UiT, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Anna Rita Spein
- Centre for Sámi Health Research, UiT - the Arctic University of Norway (UiT), Tromsø, Norway
- Sámi Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Mental Health and Substance Use (SANKS), Finnmark Hospital Trust, Karasjok, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sharland E, Rzepnicka K, Schneider D, Finning K, Pawelek P, Saunders R, Nafilyan V. Socio-demographic differences in access to psychological treatment services: evidence from a national cohort study. Psychol Med 2023; 53:7395-7406. [PMID: 37194490 PMCID: PMC10721408 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291723001010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2008, the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme has offered adults in England evidence-based psychological treatments for common mental disorders (CMDs) such as depression and anxiety disorders. However, inequalities in access have not been explored at the national level. METHODS Using a unique individual patient dataset that linked 2011 Census information of English residents to national IAPT data collected between April 2017 and March 2018, we estimated the rate of access by a wide range of socio-demographic characteristics that are not routinely available. A large household survey was used to estimate the prevalence of probable CMDs by these socio-demographic characteristics. We estimated the probability of access to IAPT amongst people with CMDs by comparing the rates of access from IAPT data and the estimates of prevalence of CMDs from the household survey. Both unadjusted and adjusted (for important patient characteristics) access rates were estimated in logistic regression models. RESULTS As a proportion of those with a probable CMD, access to IAPT varied markedly by socio-demographic characteristics. Older adults, males, people born outside of the UK, people with religious beliefs, people from Asian ethnic backgrounds, people reporting a disability and those without any academic or professional qualifications were underrepresented in IAPT services nationally, in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS The identification of patients who may be underrepresented in IAPT provides an opportunity for services to target outreach and engagement with these groups. Further understanding of barriers to access should help increase equity in access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Rob Saunders
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), University College London, London, UK
| | - Vahé Nafilyan
- Office for National Statistics, Newport, UK
- Department for Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lowther-Payne HJ, Ushakova A, Beckwith A, Liberty C, Edge R, Lobban F. Understanding inequalities in access to adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic mapping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1042. [PMID: 37773154 PMCID: PMC10542667 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population groups experience differential access to timely and high-quality mental healthcare. Despite efforts of recent UK policies to improve the accessibility of mental health services, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding of inequalities in access to services needed to do this. This systematic mapping review aimed to address this gap by identifying which population groups continue to be poorly served by access to adult mental health services in the UK, how access has been measured, and what research methods have been applied. METHODS Seven electronic databases were searched from January 2014 up to May 2022. Primary research studies of any design were included if they examined access to adult NHS mental health services in the UK by population groups at risk of experiencing inequalities. Study characteristics, measures of access, inequalities studied, and key findings were extracted. A best-fit framework approach was used, applying Levesque's Conceptual Framework for Healthcare Access to synthesise measures of access, and applying a template derived from Cochrane Progress-Plus and NHS Long Term Plan equality characteristics to synthesise key findings associated with inequalities. RESULTS Of 1,929 publications retrieved, 152 studies of various types were included. The most frequently considered dimensions of inequality were gender, age, and ethnicity, whilst social capital, religion, and sexual orientation were least frequently considered. Most studies researched access by measuring "healthcare utilisation", followed by studies that measured "healthcare seeking". Key barriers to access were associated with individuals' "ability to seek" (e.g. stigma and discrimination) and "ability to reach" (e.g. availability of services). Almost half of the studies used routinely collected patient data, and only 16% of studies reported patient and public involvement. CONCLUSIONS Little appears to have changed in the nature and extent of inequalities, suggesting that mental health services have not become more accessible. Actions to reduce inequalities should address barriers to population groups' abilities to seek and reach services such as stigma-reducing interventions, and re-designing services and pathways. Significant benefits exist in using routinely collected patient data, but its limitations should not be ignored. More theoretically informed research, using a holistic measurement of access, is needed in this area. REVIEW REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQ5U7 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley J Lowther-Payne
- Lancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK.
| | - Anastasia Ushakova
- Lancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK
| | - Adelaide Beckwith
- Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Sceptre Point, Sceptre Way, Bamber Bridge, Preston, Lancashire, PR5 6AW, UK
| | - Catherine Liberty
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, Lancashire, UK
| | - Rhiannon Edge
- Lancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK
| | - Fiona Lobban
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, Lancashire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Baou C, Desai R, Cooper C, Marchant NL, Pilling S, Richards M, Saunders R, Buckman JEJ, Aguirre E, John A, Stott J. Psychological therapies for depression and cardiovascular risk: evidence from national healthcare records in England. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:1650-1662. [PMID: 37072130 PMCID: PMC10163979 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS People with depression are up to 72% more at risk to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) in their lifetime. Evidence-based psychotherapies are first-line interventions for the treatment of depression and are delivered nationally in England through the National Health Service via the Improving Access to Psychological Therapy (IAPT) primary care programme. It is currently unknown whether positive therapy outcomes may be associated with cardiovascular risk reduction. This study aimed to examine the association between psychotherapy outcomes for depression and incident CVD. METHODS AND RESULTS A cohort of 636 955 individuals who have completed a course of psychotherapy was built from linked electronic healthcare record databases of national coverage in England: the national IAPT database, the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database, and the HES-ONS (Office of National Statistics) mortality database. Multivariable Cox models adjusting for clinical and demographic covariates were run to estimate the association between reliable improvement from depression and the risk of subsequent incidence of cardiovascular events. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, reliable improvement from depression symptoms was associated with a lower risk of new onset of any CVD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 0.89], coronary heart disease (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.92), stroke (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.94), and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.84). This association was stronger in the under 60 compared with the over 60 for all outcomes. Results were confirmed in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION Management of depression through psychological interventions may be associated with reduced risk of CVD. More research is needed to understand the causality of these associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline El Baou
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, Camden, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Roopal Desai
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, Camden, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Tower Hamlets Memory Service, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Steve Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK
- Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marcus Richards
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, UCL, London, UK
| | - Rob Saunders
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, Camden, London WC1E 7HB, UK
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Joshua E J Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK
- iCope—Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Elisa Aguirre
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust (NELFT), London, UK
| | - Amber John
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, Camden, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, Camden, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stott J, Saunders R, Desai R, Bell G, Fearn C, Buckman JEJ, Brown B, Nurock S, Michael S, Ware P, Marchant NL, Aguirre E, Rio M, Cooper C, Pilling S, Richards M, John A. Associations between psychological intervention for anxiety disorders and risk of dementia: a prospective cohort study using national health-care records data in England. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2023; 4:e12-e22. [PMID: 36509102 PMCID: PMC10570142 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00242-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meta-analyses support an association between anxiety in older adulthood and dementia. The aim of this study was to use routinely collected health data to test whether treatment of anxiety disorders through psychological intervention is associated with a lower incidence of dementia. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, data from nationally provided psychological therapy services in England termed Improving Access to Psychological Therapies from 2012 to 2019 were linked to medical records, including dementia diagnoses as defined by the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases, up to 8 follow-up years later. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who were aged 65 years and older; (2) patients with a probable anxiety disorder; and (3) those with no previous or current diagnosis of dementia. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to test whether reliable improvement in anxiety following psychological intervention was associated with future dementia incidence. The primary outcome was all-cause dementia and cases were identified using ICD-10 dementia codes from Hospital Episode Statistics, Mental Health Services Dataset, and mortality data. For main analyses, hazards ratios (HRs) are presented. FINDINGS Data from 128 077 people aged 65 years and older attending a nationally provided psychological intervention service in England were linked to medical records. 88 019 (69·0%) of 127 064 participants with available gender data were women and 39 585 (31·0%) were men. 111 225 (95·9%) of 115 989 with available ethnicity data were of White ethnicity. The mean age of the sample was 71·55 years (SD 5·69). Fully adjusted models included data from 111 958 people after 16 119 were excluded due to missing data on key variables or covariates. 4510 (4·0%) of 111 958 participants had a dementia diagnosis. The remaining 107 448 (96·0%) were censored either at date of death or when the final follow-up period available for analyses was reached. People who showed reliable improvement in anxiety had lower rates of later dementia diagnosis (3·9%) than those who did not show reliable improvement (5·1%). Reliable improvement in anxiety following psychological intervention was associated with reduced incidence of all-cause dementia (HR 0·83 [95% CI 0·78-0·88]), Alzheimer's disease (HR 0·85 [0·77-0·94]), and vascular dementia (HR 0·80 [0·71-0·90]). Effects did not differ depending on anxiety disorder diagnosis. INTERPRETATION Results showed that reliable improvement in anxiety from psychological therapy was associated with reduced incidence of future dementia. There are multiple plausible explanations for this finding and further research is needed to distinguish between these possibilities. Missing data in the sample limit reliability of findings. FUNDING Alzheimer's Society, Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, and UCLH National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rob Saunders
- Centre for Outcomes and Research Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Joshua E J Buckman
- Centre for Outcomes and Research Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK; iCope-Camden and Islington Psychological Therapies Services, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Miguel Rio
- Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes and Research Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK; Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, St Pancras Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marcus Richards
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, UCL, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Singham T, Saunders R, Brooker H, Creese B, Aarsland D, Hampshire A, Ballard C, Corbett A, Desai R, Stott J. Are subtypes of affective symptoms differentially associated with change in cognition over time: A latent class analysis. J Affect Disord 2022; 309:437-445. [PMID: 35490883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the absence of disease-modifying treatments, identifying potential psychosocial risk factors for dementia is paramount. Depression and anxiety have been identified as potential risk factors. Studies however have yielded mixed findings, lending possibility to the fact that potential constellations of co-occurring depression and anxiety symptoms may better explain the link between affective symptoms and cognitive decline. METHODS Data from participants (aged 50 and above) of the PROTECT study was used. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was conducted on 21,684 participants with baseline anxiety and depression measures. Multiple linear regressions models, using a subset of these participants (N = 6136) who had complete cognition data at baseline and at 2-year follow-up, were conducted to assess for associations between class membership and longitudinal changes in cognition. RESULTS The LCA identified a 5-class solution: "No Symptoms", "Sleep", "Sleep and Worry", "Sleep and Anhedonia", and "Co-morbid Depression and Anxiety". Class membership was significantly associated with longitudinal change in cognition. Furthermore, this association differed across different cognitive measures. LIMITATIONS Limitations included significant attrition and a generally healthy sample which may impact generalisability. CONCLUSIONS Substantial heterogeneity in affective symptoms could explain previous inconsistent findings concerning the association between affective symptoms and cognition. Clinicians should not focus solely on total symptom scores on a single affective domain, but instead on the presence and patterns of symptoms (even if sub-clinical) on measures across multiple affective domains. Identifying particular subgroups that are at greater risk of poor cognitive outcomes may support targeted prevention work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Singham
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rob Saunders
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Brooker
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK
| | - Byron Creese
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Department of Old age Psychiatry, IoPPN, Kings College London, UK; Centre for Age-related research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Adam Hampshire
- Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Clive Ballard
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK
| | - Anne Corbett
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK
| | - Roopal Desai
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|