Volume therapy in the critically ill: is there a difference?

Prevention of Acute Renal Failure - Fluid Repletion and Colloids

Hypovolemia alone or in conjunction with other factors is a main reason for acute renal failure in critically ill patients. Various crystalloid and colloid solutions are available to correct hypovolemia. Some of them have been implicated in impairment of renal function. Infusion of large amounts of sodium chloride is associated with increased incidence of nausea, vomiting and hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. While gelatins and HES are preferred colloids in patients with normal kidney function, there is some evidence that the latter are associated with impaired renal function in patients with pre-existing kidney disease. Any hyperoncotic colloid given in large amounts may decrease glomerular filtration, and should therefore be combined with crystalloids.

Audit of preoperative fluid resuscitation in perforation peritonitis patients using Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity

Context:

Debate continues regarding fluid (crystalloid vs. colloid) of choice for resuscitation. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) may be used to compare the benefits of preoperative fluid resuscitation with crystalloids and colloids in peritonitis patients.

Aims:

The aim of this study is to compare crystalloid and colloid for preoperative resuscitation using morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and time taken to resuscitate as the outcome parameters.

Settings and Design:

This was a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Subjects and Methods:

One hundred and seven peritonitis patients were prospectively randomized to fluid resuscitation by crystalloid (Group A) and colloid (Group B) solutions. Physiological score component of POSSUM was recorded before and after fluid resuscitation; operative score component was recorded at discharge/death. These scores were then used to calculate the predicted morbidity and mortality before and after the fluid resuscitation.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Effect on morbidity and mortality were compared by repeated measure analysis of variance, and its significance was tested by Tukey's test. LOS and time taken to resuscitate were compared using unpaired t-test. Significance was taken at 5%.

Results:

Fluid resuscitation improved mean predicted morbidity by 0.095 and 0.137 in Group A and Group B, respectively. Similarly, fluid resuscitation improved predicted mortality by 0.145 and 0.185 in Group A and Group B, respectively. These changes were statistically significant. Improvement in morbidity and mortality appeared greater in Group B. No difference was found in the two groups for LOS and time to resuscitate.

Conclusions:

Preoperative fluid resuscitation using either crystalloid or colloidal solutions decreases morbidity as well as mortality in peritonitis patients.

Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis: systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Colloids are widely used for fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis. But the optimal type of fluid remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess the effects on mortality and safety of different colloid solutions in patients with sepsis requiring volume replacement by examining direct comparisons of colloid solutions.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine Database, VIP Chinese Journals Database, and CNKI China National Knowledge Infrastructure Whole Article Database. Randomized clinical trials comparing different colloids in septic patients needing fluid resuscitation were selected.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized clinical trials with a total 1281 participants met the inclusion criteria. Mortality was obtained in all trials. For intervention of albumin vs. hydroxyethyl starch solution (HES), the relative risk (RR) of death was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.30). For intervention of albumin vs. gelatin, the RR of death was 2.4 (95% CI 0.31-18.35). For intervention of gelatin vs. HES, the RR of death was 1.02 (95% CI 0.79-1.32). For the intervention of HES vs. dextran, the RR of death was 1.38 (95% CI 0.28-6.78). For the intervention of gelatin vs. dextran, RR of death was not estimable. For albumin vs. dextran, no trial was included. Four trials of intervention of albumin vs. HES recorded the change of severity score.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that one colloid solution is more effective and safer than another for fluid resuscitation in sepsis. The severity score is improved in HES, but the confidence intervals are wide.

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) are synthetic colloids commonly used for fluid resuscitation to replace intravascular volume, yet they have been increasingly associated with adverse effects on kidney function. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2010.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of HES on kidney function compared to other fluid resuscitation therapies in different patient populations.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, MetaRegister and reference lists of articles. The most recent search was completed on November 19, 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which HES was compared to an alternate fluid therapy for the prevention or treatment of effective intravascular volume depletion. Primary outcomes were renal replacement therapy (RRT), author-defined kidney failure and acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the RIFLE criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessments for each retrieved article were carried out by two authors using standardised forms. All outcomes were analysed using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Authors were contacted when published data were incomplete. Preplanned sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed after data were analysed with a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

This review included 42 studies (11,399 patients) including 19 studies from the original review (2010), as well as 23 new studies. Fifteen studies were excluded from the original review (nine retracted from publication due to concerns about integrity of data and six lacking individual patient creatinine data for the calculation of RIFLE criteria). Overall, there was a significant increase in the need for RRT in the HES treated individuals compared to individuals treated with other fluid therapies (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.49; 19 studies, 9857 patients) and the number with author-defined kidney failure (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.00; 15 studies, 1361 patients). The RR of AKI based on RIFLE-F (failure) criteria also showed an increased risk of AKI in individuals treated with HES products (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.30; 15 studies, 8402 participants). The risk of meeting urine output and creatinine based RIFLE-R (risk) criteria for AKI was in contrast in favour of HES therapies (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99; 20 studies, 8769 patients). However, when RIFLE-R urine output based outcomes were excluded as per study protocol, the direction of AKI risk again favoured the other fluid type, with a non-significant RR of AKI in HES treated patients (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.14; 8445 patients). A more robust effect was seen for the RIFLE-I (injury) outcome, with a RR of AKI of 1.22 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.37; 8338 patients). No differences between subgroups for the RRT and RIFLE-F based outcomes were seen between sepsis versus non-sepsis patients, high molecular weight (MW) and degree of substitution (DS) versus low MW and DS (≥ 200 kDa and > 0.4 DS versus 130 kDa and 0.4 DS) HES solutions, or high versus low dose treatments (i.e. ≥ 2 L versus < 2 L). There were differences identified between sepsis versus non-sepsis subgroups for the RIFLE-R and RIFLE-I based outcomes only, which may reflect the differing renal response to fluid resuscitation in pre-renal versus sepsis-associated AKI. Overall, methodological quality of the studies was good.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that all HES products increase the risk in AKI and RRT in all patient populations and a safe volume of any HES solution has yet to be determined. In most clinical situations it is likely that these risks outweigh any benefits, and alternate volume replacement therapies should be used in place of HES products.

Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of fluid therapy with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin on mortality, kidney injury, bleeding, and serious adverse events in patients with sepsis.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomised clinical trials.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Biosis Previews, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Current Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Centerwatch to September 2012; hand search of reference lists and other systematic reviews; contact with authors and relevant pharmaceutical companies.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible trials were randomised clinical trials comparing hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 with either crystalloid or human albumin in patients with sepsis. Published and unpublished trials were included irrespective of language and predefined outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data on methods, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. Risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were estimated with fixed and random effects models.

RESULTS

Nine trials that randomised 3456 patients with sepsis were included. Overall, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin did not affect the relative risk of death (1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.22, 3414 patients, eight trials), but in the predefined analysis of trials with low risk of bias the relative risk of death was 1.11 (1.00 to 1.23, trial sequential analysis (TSA) adjusted 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.29, 3016 patients, four trials). In the hydroxyethyl starch group, renal replacement therapy was used more (1.36, 1.08 to 1.72, TSA adjusted 1.03 to 1.80, 1311 patients, five trials), and the relative risk of acute kidney injury was 1.18 (0.99 to 1.40, TSA adjusted 0.90 to 1.54, 994 patients, four trials). More patients in the hydroxyethyl starch group were transfused with red blood cells (1.29, 1.13 to 1.48, TSA adjusted 1.10 to 1.51, 973 patients, three trials), and more patients had serious adverse events (1.30, 1.02 to 1.67, TSA adjusted 0.93 to 1.83, 1069 patients, four trials). The transfused volume of red blood cells did not differ between the groups (mean difference 65 mL, 95% confidence interval -20 to 149 mL, three trials).

CONCLUSION

In conventional meta-analyses including recent trial data, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin increased the use of renal replacement therapy and transfusion with red blood cells, and resulted in more serious adverse events in patients with sepsis. It seems unlikely that hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 provides overall clinical benefit for patients with sepsis.

Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Colloids are widely used in the replacement of fluid volume. However, doubts remain as to which colloid is best. Different colloids vary in their molecular weight and therefore in the length of time they remain in the circulatory system. Because of this, and their other characteristics, they may differ in their safety and efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different colloid solutions in patients thought to need volume replacement.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Specialised Register (searched 1 December 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 2011, issue 4 (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE (Ovid) (1948 to November Week 3 2011); EMBASE (Ovid) (1974 to 2011 Week 47); ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (1970 to 1 December 2011); ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (1990 to 1 December 2011); CINAHL (EBSCO) (1982 to 1 December 2011); National Research Register (2007, Issue 1) and PubMed (searched 1 December 2011). Bibliographies of trials retrieved were searched, and for the initial version of the review drug companies manufacturing colloids were contacted for information (1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing colloid solutions in critically ill and surgical patients thought to need volume replacement.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the trials. The outcomes sought were death, amount of whole blood transfused, and incidence of adverse reactions.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six trials, with a total of 5,484 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Quality of allocation concealment was judged to be adequate in 33 trials and poor or uncertain in the rest.Deaths were reported in 57 trials. For albumin or plasma protein fraction (PPF) versus hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 31 trials (n = 1719) reported mortality. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.31). When the trials by Boldt were removed from the analysis the pooled RR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.20). For albumin or PPF versus gelatin, nine trials (n = 824) reported mortality. The RR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.21). Removing the study by Boldt from the analysis did not change the RR or CIs. For albumin or PPF versus dextran four trials (n = 360) reported mortality. The RR was 3.75 (95% CI 0.42 to 33.09). For gelatin versus HES 22 trials (n = 1612) reported mortality and the RR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.26). When the trials by Boldt were removed from the analysis the pooled RR was 1.03 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.27). RR was not estimable in the gelatin versus dextran and HES versus dextran groups.Forty-one trials recorded the amount of blood transfused; however, quantitative analysis was not possible due to skewness and variable reporting. Twenty-four trials recorded adverse reactions, with two studies reporting possible adverse reactions to gel and one to HES.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

From this review, there is no evidence that one colloid solution is more effective or safe than any other, although the CIs were wide and do not exclude clinically significant differences between colloids. Larger trials of fluid therapy are needed if clinically significant differences in mortality are to be detected or excluded.

Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Colloids are widely used in the replacement of fluid volume. However doubts remain as to which colloid is best. Different colloids vary in their molecular weight and therefore in the length of time they remain in the circulatory system. Because of this and their other characteristics, they may differ in their safety and efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different colloid solutions in patients thought to need volume replacement.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Specialised Register (searched 1 Dec 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 2011, issue 4 (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE (Ovid) (1948 to November Week 3 2011); EMBASE (Ovid) (1974 to 2011 Week 47); ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (1970 to 1 Dec 2011); ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (1990 to 1 Dec 2011); CINAHL (EBSCO) (1982 to 1 Dec 2011); National Research Register (2007, Issue 1) and PubMed (searched 1 Dec 2011). Bibliographies of trials retrieved were searched, and for the initial version of the review drug companies manufacturing colloids were contacted for information (1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing colloid solutions in critically ill and surgical patients thought to need volume replacement.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the trials. The outcomes sought were death, amount of whole blood transfused, and incidence of adverse reactions.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety trials, with a total of 5678 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Quality of allocation concealment was judged to be adequate in 35 trials and poor or uncertain in the rest.Deaths were obtained in 61 trials. For albumin or PPF versus hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 32 trials (n = 1769) reported mortality. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.07 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.32). When the trials by Boldt were removed from the analysis the pooled RR was 0.90 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.20). For albumin or PPF versus gelatin, nine trials (n = 824) reported mortality. The RR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.21). Removing the study by Boldt from the analysis did not change the RR or confidence intervals. For albumin or PPF versus Dextran four trials (n = 360) reported mortality. The RR was 3.75 (95% CI 0.42 to 33.09). For gelatin versus HES 25 trials (n = 1756) reported mortality and the RR was 1.03 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.26). When the trials by Boldt were removed from the analysis the pooled RR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.27). RR was not estimable in the gelatin versus dextran and HES versus dextran groups.Forty five trials recorded the amount of blood transfused, however quantitative analysis was not possible due to skewness and variable reporting. Twenty-four trials recorded adverse reactions, with two studies reporting possible adverse reactions to Gel and one to HES.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

From this review, there is no evidence that one colloid solution is more effective or safe than any other, although the confidence intervals are wide and do not exclude clinically significant differences between colloids. Larger trials of fluid therapy are needed if clinically significant differences in mortality are to be detected or excluded.

Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Colloids are widely used in the replacement of fluid volume. However doubts remain as to which colloid is best. Different colloids vary in their molecular weight and therefore in the length of time they remain in the circulatory system. Because of this and their other characteristics, they may differ in their safety and efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different colloid solutions in patients thought to need volume replacement.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group's specialised register, CENTRAL (2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1994 to March 2007), EMBASE (1974 to March 2007), and the National Research Register (2007, Issue 1). Bibliographies of trials retrieved were searched, and drug companies manufacturing colloids were contacted for information. The search was last updated in March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing colloid solutions in critically ill and surgical patients thought to need volume replacement. The outcomes measured were death, amount of whole blood transfused, and incidence of adverse reactions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy trials, with a total of 4375 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Quality of allocation concealment was judged to be adequate in 24 trials and poor or uncertain in the rest.Deaths were obtained in 46 trials. For albumin or PPF versus hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 25 trials (n = 1234) reported mortality. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.14 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.43). When the trials by Boldt are removed from the analysis the pooled RR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.35). For albumin or PPF versus gelatin, seven trials (n = 636) reported mortality. The RR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.39). For albumin or PPF versus Dextran four trials (n = 360) reported mortality. The RR was 3.75 (95% CI 0.42 to 33.09). For gelatin versus HES 18 trials (n = 1337) reported mortality and RR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.25). RR was not estimable in the gelatin versus dextran and HES versus dextran groups.Thirty-seven trials recorded the amount of blood transfused, however quantitative analysis was not possible due to skewness and variable reporting. Nineteen trials recorded adverse reactions, but none occurred.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

From this review, there is no evidence that one colloid solution is more effective or safe than any other, although the confidence intervals are wide and do not exclude clinically significant differences between colloids. Larger trials of fluid therapy are needed if clinically significant differences in mortality are to be detected or excluded.

Are renal adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starches merely a consequence of their incorrect use?

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies such as VISEP-study, which show a negative outcome after the administration of hydroxyethyl starch (HES), are often criticized for an "incorrect" use of HES. It is argued that HES used in these studies differed from usual practice and that recommendations for maximal dosage, duration, and creatinine values were ignored, not enough "free water" was provided and more modern HES solutions should have been used. These comments imply that renal adverse events in clinical studies are the consequence of an inappropriate use of HES. We therefore searched for evidence whether these suggested measures are beneficial.

METHODS

Narrative review; post hoc statistical analysis of epidemiologic data from a representative nationwide survey.

RESULTS

It is evident from published clinical studies that the renal risk of HES increases with cumulative dose and rising serum creatinine values, but no safe upper dose limit or creatinine threshold is known. Suggested safety measures were not able to prevent HES-induced renal failure in clinical studies. Published clinical trials with modern HES solutions are not suited to prove its assumed increased safety because of small sample sizes, low cumulative doses, short observation periods, and inadequate control fluids. Use of HES in a clinical study with negative outcomes conformed to clinical practice, indicating the generalizability of study results.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence for the assumption that HES-associated renal impairment may be avoided by accompanying measures. Because HES use does not improve clinical outcome, the question arises whether it should be used at all in patients at risk.

Comparing the effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 with balanced crystalloid solution on mortality and kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis (6S--Scandinavian Starch for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock trial): study protocol, design and rationale for a double-blinded, randomised clinical trial

Background

By tradition colloid solutions have been used to obtain fast circulatory stabilisation in shock, but high molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES) may cause acute kidney failure in patients with severe sepsis. Now lower molecular weight HES 130/0.4 is the preferred colloid in Scandinavian intensive care units (ICUs) and 1^st choice fluid for patients with severe sepsis. However, HES 130/0.4 is largely unstudied in patients with severe sepsis.

Methods/Design

The 6S trial will randomise 800 patients with severe sepsis in 30 Scandinavian ICUs to masked fluid resuscitation using either 6% HES 130/0.4 in Ringer's acetate or Ringer's acetate alone. The composite endpoint of 90-day mortality or end-stage kidney failure is the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures are severe bleeding or allergic reactions, organ failure, acute kidney failure, days alive without renal replacement therapy or ventilator support and 28-day and 1/2- and one-year mortality. The sample size will allow the detection of a 10% absolute difference between the two groups in the composite endpoint with a power of 80%.

Discussion

The 6S trial will provide important safety and efficacy data on the use of HES 130/0.4 in patients with severe sepsis. The effects on mortality, dialysis-dependency, time on ventilator, bleeding and markers of resuscitation, metabolism, kidney failure, and coagulation will be assessed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00962156

Capillary leakage in post-cardiac arrest survivors during therapeutic hypothermia - a prospective, randomised study

Background

Fluids are often given liberally after the return of spontaneous circulation. However, the optimal fluid regimen in survivors of cardiac arrest is unknown. Recent studies indicate an increased fluid requirement in post-cardiac arrest patients. During hypothermia, animal studies report extravasation in several organs, including the brain. We investigated two fluid strategies to determine whether the choice of fluid would influence fluid requirements, capillary leakage and oedema formation.

Methods

19 survivors with witnessed cardiac arrest of primary cardiac origin were allocated to either 7.2% hypertonic saline with 6% poly (O-2-hydroxyethyl) starch solution (HH) or standard fluid therapy (Ringer's Acetate and saline 9 mg/ml) (control). The patients were treated with the randomised fluid immediately after admission and continued for 24 hours of therapeutic hypothermia.

Results

During the first 24 hours, the HH patients required significantly less i.v. fluid than the control patients (4750 ml versus 8010 ml, p = 0.019) with comparable use of vasopressors. Systemic vascular resistance was significantly reduced from 0 to 24 hours (p = 0.014), with no difference between the groups. Colloid osmotic pressure (COP) in serum and interstitial fluid (p < 0.001 and p = 0.014 respectively) decreased as a function of time in both groups, with a more pronounced reduction in interstitial COP in the crystalloid group. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain did not reveal vasogenic oedema.

Conclusions

Post-cardiac arrest patients have high fluid requirements during therapeutic hypothermia, probably due to increased extravasation. The use of HH reduced the fluid requirement significantly. However, the lack of brain oedema in both groups suggests no superior fluid regimen. Cardiac index was significantly improved in the group treated with crystalloids. Although we do not associate HH with the renal failures that developed, caution should be taken when using hypertonic starch solutions in these patients.

Trial registration

NCT00347477.

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) are synthetic colloids commonly used for fluid resuscitation, yet controversy exists about their impact on kidney function.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of HES on kidney function compared to other fluid resuscitation therapies in different patient populations.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, MetaRegister and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which HES was compared to an alternate fluid therapy for the prevention or treatment of effective intravascular volume depletion. Primary outcomes were renal replacement therapy (RRT), author-defined kidney failure and acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the RIFLE criteria. Secondary outcomes included serum creatinine and creatinine clearance.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Screening, selection, data extraction and quality assessments for each retrieved article were carried out by two authors using standardised forms. Authors were contacted when published data were incomplete. Preplanned sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed after data were analysed with a random effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included 34 studies (2607 patients). Overall, the RR of author-defined kidney failure was 1.50 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.87; n = 1199) and 1.38 for requiring RRT (95% CI 0.89 to 2.16; n = 1236) in HES treated individuals compared with other fluid therapies. Subgroup analyses suggested increased risk in septic patients compared to non-septic (surgical/trauma) patients. Non-septic patient studies were smaller and had lower event rates, so subgroup differences may have been due to lack of statistical power in these studies. Only limited data was obtained for analysis of kidney outcomes by the RIFLE criteria. Overall, methodological quality of studies was good but subjective outcomes were potentially biased because most studies were unblinded.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Potential for increased risk of AKI should be considered when weighing the risks and benefits of HES for volume resuscitation, particularly in septic patients. Large studies with adequate follow-up are required to evaluate the renal safety of HES products in non-septic patient populations. RIFLE criteria should be applied to evaluate kidney function in future studies of HES and, where data is available, to re-analyse those studies already published. There is inadequate clinical data to address the claim that safety differences exist between different HES products.

PRO: hydroxyethylstarch can be safely used in the intensive care patient--the renal debate

INTRODUCTION

Correcting hypovolemia is fundamental when treating the critically ill. Different hydroxyethylstarch (HES) preparations with different physicochemical characteristics (mean molecular weight (Mw), molar substitution (MS), C2/C6 ratio, balanced/unbalanced) are available. The possible detrimental effect of HES on kidney function has become a major objection to using HES.

METHODS

This review focuses on the effect of HES on kidney function.

RESULTS

First and second-generation HES with high Mw (>200 kD) and high MS (>0.5) have been shown to impair kidney function in some studies of septic patients, especially when using hyperoncotic HES. More rapidly degradable HES preparations (Mw 130 kD; MS < 0.5) did not cause deterioration of kidney function in a variety of clinical conditions. Even when kidney function was impaired (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL) this HES preparation was without negative effect. Dissolving HES in a balanced solution instead of saline may further improve the safety of HES with regard to kidney function. Dose limitations of the specific HES preparation should be carefully considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperoncotic HES should not be used in patients who are at risk of developing kidney dysfunction. In patients without preexisting kidney dysfunction there seems to be no negative effects of modern HES preparations. In septic patients with reduced kidney function (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL) HES should be used cautiously, because studies of these patients are not available. Dissolving HES in a balanced solution further improves the safety of HES with regard to kidney function. At present, there seems to be no good reason to generally ban use of HES in our patients.

Pro/con debate: should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?

You have recently heard reports that synthetic colloids may be associated with renal failure and other morbidities in certain populations of critically ill patients. You have been asked by the hospital chief of staff whether there should be a suspension of the use of synthetic colloids until further information is available. You need to make a decision.

[Study protocol of the VISEP study. Response of the SepNet study group]

In the commentary by Zander et al. the authors appear concerned about the methods and results of our, at that time, unpublished sepsis trial evaluating hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and insulin therapy. Unfortunately, the authors' concerns are based on false assumptions about the design, conduct and modes of action of the compounds under investigation. For instance, in our study the HES solution was not used for maintenance of daily fluid requirements, so that the assumption of the authors that this colloid was used "exclusively" is wrong. Moreover, the manufacturer of Hemohes, the HES product we used, gives no cut-off value for creatinine, thus the assumption that this cut-off value was "doubled" in our study is also incorrect. Other claims by the authors such as that lactated solutions cause elevated lactate levels, iatrogenic hyperglycemia and increase O(2) consumption are unfounded. There is no randomized controlled trial supporting such a claim - this claim is neither consistent with our study data nor with any credible published sepsis guidelines or with routine practice worldwide. We fully support open scientific debate. Our study methods and results have now been published after a strict peer-reviewing process and this data is now open to critical and constructive reviewing. However, in our opinion this premature action based on wrong assumptions and containing comments by representatives of pharmaceutical companies does not contribute to a serious, unbiased scientific discourse.

Permanent renal failure induced by pentastarch

Background. Controversy exists with volume resuscitation using crystalloids or colloids. Renal dysfunction has been reported with some colloids and osmotic agents, but remains poorly defined. Patient. We report the case of a 67-year-old male who had normal kidney function at baseline and who developed anuric ARF in relation to the administration of >10 litres of 10% pentastarch. A renal biopsy confirmed hydropic changes in tubular cells compatible with colloid-induced damage. Conclusion. This case demonstrates that hydroxyethyl starch preparations may be associated with acute kidney injury, and one should carefully consider their use, especially in patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction. Osmotic tubular cell lesions may be long lasting and irreversible.

Haemodynamics and Acid-Base Equilibrium after Cardiac Surgery: Comparison of Rapidly Degradable Hydroxythyl Starch Solutions and Albumin

Background:

Stable haemodynamics is often achieved by administration of colloids after cardiac surgery. We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label study comparing haemodynamics and acid-base equilibrium after infusion of two rapidly degradable hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions or human albumin (HA) to cardiac surgical patients.

Materials and Methods:

45 patients received a predetermined fixed dose of 15 ml kg−1 of either 6% HES (MW 130 kDa, n=15), 6% HES (MW 200 kDa, n=15) or 4% HA (MW 69 kDa, n=15) after on-pump cardiac surgery.

Results:

Left ventricular filling pressures assessed using pulmonary artery catheter responded similarly in all groups. Mean (SD) cardiac index was higher in HES130 [3.5 1 min−1 m−2 (0.7)] and HES200 [3.5 1 min−1 m−2 (0.5)] than in HA [2.8 1 min−1 m−2 (0.6)] group after completion of infusion (P=0.002) but no differences were detected at 2 and 18 hours. Oxygen delivery increased in both HES groups but not in HA group. After cessation of infusion base excess was the most negative in HA group. At 2 hours mean (SD) base excess was higher in HWS130 [0 (1.32)] than in HES200 [-1.32 (2.27)] and HA [-2.3 (1.3)] group (P=0.002, between the groups).

Conclusions:

We conclude that the effect of albumin on cardiac performance is inferior than that of HES130 or HES200 in early postoperative phase after cardiac surgery. HES130 induces no alterations in acid-base equilibrium whereas a negative base excess was observed after HA infusion.

Safety of HES 130/0.4 (Voluven(R)) in patients with preoperative renal dysfunction undergoing abdominal aortic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group multicentre trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients with impaired renal function are at risk of developing renal dysfunction after abdominal aortic surgery. This study investigated the safety profile of a recent medium-molecular-weight hydroxyethyl starch (HES) preparation with a low molar substitution (HES 130/0.4) in this sensitive patient group.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients were randomly allocated to receive either 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven); n = 32) or 3% gelatin (Plasmion); n = 33) for perioperative volume substitution. At baseline, renal function was impaired in all study patients as indicated by a measured creatinine clearance < 80 mL min(-1). The main renal safety parameter was the peak increase in serum creatinine up to day 6 after surgery.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups were compared for non-inferiority (pre-defined non-inferiority range hydroxyethyl starch < gelatin + 17.68 micromol L(-1) or 0.2 mg dL(-1). Other renal safety parameters included minimum postoperative creatinine clearance, incidence of oliguria and adverse events of the renal system. Baseline characteristics, surgical procedures and the mean total infusion volume were comparable. Non-inferiority of hydroxyethyl starch vs. gelatin could be shown by means of the appropriate non-parametric one-sided 95% CI for the difference hydroxyethyl starch-gelatin [-infinity, 11 micromol L(-1)]. Oliguria was encountered in three patients of the hydroxyethyl starch and four of the gelatin treatment group. One patient receiving gelatin required dialysis secondary to surgical complications. Two patients of each treatment group died.

CONCLUSION

As we found no drug-related adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starch on renal function, we conclude that the choice of the colloid had no impact on renal safety parameters and outcome in patients with decreased renal function undergoing elective abdominal aortic surgery.

Small-volume resuscitation with hyperoncotic albumin: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Background

Small-volume resuscitation can rapidly correct hypovolemia. Hyperoncotic albumin solutions, long in clinical use, are suitable for small-volume resuscitation; however, their clinical benefits remain uncertain.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials comparing hyperoncotic albumin with a control regimen for volume expansion were sought by multiple methods, including computer searches of bibliographic databases, perusal of reference lists, and manual searching. Major findings were qualitatively summarized. In addition, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed on available survival data.

Results

In all, 25 randomized clinical trials with a total of 1,485 patients were included. In surgery, hyperoncotic albumin preserved renal function and reduced intestinal edema compared with control fluids. In trauma and sepsis, cardiac index and oxygenation were higher after administration of hydroxyethyl starch than hyperoncotic albumin. Improved treatment response and renal function, shorter hospital stay and lower costs of care were reported in patients with liver disease receiving hyperoncotic albumin. Edema and morbidity were decreased in high-risk neonates after hyperoncotic albumin administration. Disability was reduced by therapy with hyperoncotic albumin in brain injury. There was no evidence of deleterious effects attributable to hyperoncotic albumin. Survival was unaffected by hyperoncotic albumin (pooled relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.17).

Conclusion

In some clinical indications, randomized trial evidence has suggested certain benefits of hyperoncotic albumin such as reductions in morbidity, renal impairment and edema. However, further clinical trials are needed, particularly in surgery, trauma and sepsis.

Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis

Background

Patients with sepsis typically require large resuscitation volumes, but the optimal type of fluid remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis.

Methods

Computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were performed using search terms that included hydroxyethyl starch; hetastarch; shock, septic; sepsis; randomized controlled trials; and random allocation. Additional methods were examination of reference lists and hand searching. Randomized clinical trials comparing hydroxyethyl starch with other fluids in patients with sepsis were selected. Data were extracted on numbers of patients randomized, specific indication, fluid regimen, follow-up, endpoints, hydroxyethyl starch volume infused and duration of administration, and major study findings.

Results

Twelve randomized trials involving a total of 1062 patients were included. Ten trials (83%) were acute studies with observation periods of 5 days or less, most frequently assessing cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic variables. Two trials were designed as outcome studies with follow-up for 34 and 90 days, respectively. Hydroxyethyl starch increased the incidence of acute renal failure compared both with gelatin (odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–5.83) and crystalloid (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–2.71). In the largest and most recent trial a trend was observed toward increased overall mortality among hydroxyethyl starch recipients (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.94–1.95), and mortality was higher (p < 0.001) in patients receiving > 22 mL·kg^-1 hydroxyethyl starch per day than lower doses.

Conclusion

Hydroxyethyl starch increases the risk of acute renal failure among patients with sepsis and may also reduce the probability of survival. While the evidence reviewed cannot necessarily be applied to other clinical indications, hydroxyethyl starch should be avoided in sepsis.

Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Colloids are widely used in the replacement of fluid volume. However doubts remain as to which colloid is best. Different colloids vary in their molecular weight and therefore in the length of time they remain in the circulatory system. Because of this and their other characteristics, they may differ in their safety and efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of different colloid solutions in patients thought to need volume replacement.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group specialised register, CENTRAL (2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1994 to March 2007), EMBASE (1974 to March 2007), and the National Research Register (2007, issue 1). Bibliographies of trials retrieved were searched, and drug companies manufacturing colloids were contacted for information. The search was last updated in March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing colloid solutions in critically ill and surgical patients thought to need volume replacement. The outcomes measured were death, amount of whole blood transfused, and incidence of adverse reactions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy trials, with a total of 4375 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Quality of allocation concealment was judged to be adequate in 24 trials and poor or uncertain in the rest. Deaths were obtained in 46 trials. For albumin or PPF versus hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 25 trials (n = 1234) reported mortality. The pooled relative risk (RR) was 1.14 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.43). For albumin or PPF versus gelatin, seven trials (n = 636) reported mortality. The RR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.39). For albumin or PPF versus Dextran four trials (n = 360) reported mortality. The RR was 3.75 (95% CI 0.42 to 33.09). For gelatin versus HES 18 trials (n = 1337) reported mortality and RR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.25). RR was not estimable in the gelatin versus dextran and HES versus dextran groups.Thirty-seven trials recorded the amount of blood transfused, however quantitative analysis was not possible due to skewness and variable reporting. Nineteen trials recorded adverse reactions, but none occurred.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

From this review, there is no evidence that one colloid solution is more effective or safe than any other, although the confidence intervals are wide and do not exclude clinically significant differences between colloids. Larger trials of fluid therapy are needed if clinically significant differences in mortality are to be detected or excluded.

HYDROXYETHYL STARCH NORMALIZES PLATELET AND LEUKOCYTE ADHESION WITHIN PULMONARY MICROCIRCULATION DURING LPS-INDUCED ENDOTOXEMIA

Growing evidence supports substantial pathophysiological impact of platelets and their interactions on the development of septic lung failure. We developed a rat model of endotoxemia for direct in situ visualization of pulmonary microcirculation by in vivo fluorescence videomicroscopy. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to control, endotoxemia (Escherichia coli LPS, 15 mg/kg, i.v.), and fluid management for treatment of LPS-induced hypovolemia (Ringer lactate, hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 6%) groups (n = 7 each). Leukocytes were labeled in vivo by rhodamine, and 5 x 10(6) Calcein-AM-labeled nonactivated platelets were injected. Microcirculatory parameters (vessel diameter, ventilation-perfusion ratio) and adhesive characteristics of platelets and leukocytes (velocity, rolling, sticking) within the pulmonary microcirculation were quantified after endotoxin application under various regimens of fluid substitution for 60 min. A reduction of cell velocity and enhanced cell adhesion was seen in leukocytes and platelets (P < 0.05) after LPS injection. Fluid treatment with HES 6% resulted in a significant increase of platelet's velocity compared with the LPS group (442.86 +/- 20.60 vs. 343.93 +/- 11.17; P < 0.05), whereas Ringer lactate showed no beneficial effects. Similarly, HES 6% normalized LPS-induced platelet rolling and sticking as well as alterations in ventilation-perfusion ratio. Using direct visualization of the pulmonary microcirculation, we observed that platelet and leukocyte interactions are enhanced in the lung during LPS endotoxemia. Fluid therapy with HES 6% seems to have restorative effects on these cellular functions within the pulmonary microcirculation.

Safety and efficacy of albumin administration in trauma

Albumin is one of the oldest known and studied human proteins. It is characterised by diverse physiological and biochemical properties that render it relevant to many aspects of the disordered vascular and cellular functions after trauma. Apart from the ability to maintain the colloid oncotic pressure, human serum albumin has multiple effects, including antioxidant activity and binding affinity for drugs and toxic substances, inhibition of apoptosis and modulation of trauma-induced inflammatory response. According to the current state of knowledge, there are conflicting results regarding the benefits of albumin administration in critically ill patients. Further investigations are warranted to resolve the continued uncertainty about the safety and efficacy of human serum albumin in specific clinical circumstances and selected populations of severely injured patients.

Pharmacodynamics and organ storage of hydroxyethyl starch in acute hemodilution in pigs: influence of molecular weight and degree of substitution

OBJECTIVE

To determine the differential influence of molecular weight and the degree of substitution of HES solutions on pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics including organ storage in a model of acute hemodilution in pigs.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled randomized animal trial.

INTERVENTIONS

After bleeding, 20 ml/kg, animals were substituted with 6% HES preparations (200/0.62, 200/0.5, and 100/0.5).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We did not observe any significant differences in the ability to sufficiently achieve plasma volume expansion and restoration of macrocirculation, nor maintenance of indicators of microcirculation between the groups. Urine production was significantly higher in HES-treated animals and highest in animals substituted with HES 100/0.5. Plasma clearance was measured under steady-state conditions with significantly reduced clearance for the HES 200/0.62 group compared with HES 100/0.5 and HES 200/0.5 (6.6 vs. 13.2 and 13.9 ml/min; P < or = 0.001), thus being dependent on the degree of substitution. Even after only 6 h, the amount of infused HES not detectable in either blood or urine was significantly higher in HES 200/0.62-treated animals (50.7% compared with HES 200/0.5 (28.8%), P = 0.020 and HES 100/0.5 (28.4%), P = 0.018), with its proportion rising over time. Finally, we could demonstrate considerable amounts of all HES solutions being stored in liver, kidney, lung, spleen and lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

All preparations analyzed sufficiently restored macro- and microcirculation; however, for all solutions relevant tissue storage of HES was observed after only 6 h.

Fluid resuscitation increases inflammatory gene transcription after traumatic injury

BACKGROUND

The debate continues over type and quantity of fluid to administer for resuscitation after traumatic injury. This study aimed to examine effects of resuscitation with lactated Ringer's (LR) and Hextend (HEX) on the inflammatory response after uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS).

METHODS

There were 38 swine randomized. Control swine were anesthetized and killed. Sham swine underwent laparotomy, splenectomy, and 2 hours of anesthesia. UHS swine received a grade V liver injury after laparotomy and splenectomy and were randomized to no fluid (NF) resuscitation or to blinded resuscitation 30 minutes after injury with LR or HEX. Fluids were infused as needed to maintain baseline blood pressure for 90 minutes. Lung tissue mRNA levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) were determined. Lung sections were examined for neutrophils (PMNs) sequestered within alveolar walls.

RESULTS

All UHS animals survived and initial blood loss was similar between groups. Mean arterial pressures (MAPs) were similar for all UHS animals until resuscitation was initiated. MAPs of resuscitated animals remained similar and were significantly higher than MAPs of the NF animals. Sequestered PMNs were equally elevated in all UHS animals. Cytokine analysis showed increased IL-6, G-CSF, and TNF-alpha gene transcription in resuscitated swine compared with NF swine. LR and HEX resuscitated swine tissue mRNA levels showed no differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluid resuscitation after solid organ injury and uncontrolled hemorrhage results in greater proinflammatory gene transcription than no resuscitation. LR and HEX resuscitation have equivalent effects on indices of inflammation in the lungs.

Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analyses could offer useful insights

OBJECTIVES

Meta-analyses are routinely evaluated for the presence of large between-study heterogeneity. We examined whether it is also important to probe whether there is extreme between-study homogeneity.

STUDY DESIGN

We used heterogeneity tests with left-sided statistical significance for inference and developed a Monte Carlo simulation test for testing extreme homogeneity in risk ratios across studies, using the empiric distribution of the summary risk ratio and heterogeneity statistic. A left-sided P=0.01 threshold was set for claiming extreme homogeneity to minimize type I error.

RESULTS

Among 11,803 meta-analyses with binary contrasts from the Cochrane Library, 143 (1.21%) had left-sided P-value <0.01 for the asymptotic Q statistic and 1,004 (8.50%) had left-sided P-value <0.10. The frequency of extreme between-study homogeneity did not depend on the number of studies in the meta-analyses. We identified examples where extreme between-study homogeneity (left-sided P-value <0.01) could result from various possibilities beyond chance. These included inappropriate statistical inference (asymptotic vs. Monte Carlo), use of a specific effect metric, correlated data or stratification using strong predictors of outcome, and biases and potential fraud.

CONCLUSION

Extreme between-study homogeneity may provide useful insights about a meta-analysis and its constituent studies.

Management of sepsis in neutropenia: guidelines of the infectious diseases working party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)

These guidelines from the infectious diseases working party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO) give recommendations for the management of adults with neutropenia and the diagnosis of sepsis. The guidelines are written for clinicians and focus on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of sepsis. The manuscript contains evidence-based recommendations for the assessment of the quality and strength of the data.

Endotoxin-induced heart dysfunction in rats: assessment of myocardial perfusion and permeability and the role of fluid resuscitation

OBJECTIVE

The pathophysiology of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is still controversial. Whether microcirculatory hypoperfusion together with capillary leakage can occur in the heart wall also remains a matter of debate. The objective was to evaluate the impact of fluid resuscitation on endotoxin-induced myocardial dysfunction.

DESIGN

Adult rats were given intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, Escherichia coli, 10 mg/kg) or phosphate-buffered solution, followed up by echocardiography and acetate micro-positron emission tomography scan imaging, together with final hemodynamic, biochemical, and pathologic evaluations up to 48 hrs.

SETTING

University laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Pathogen-free male Wistar rats (350 g).

INTERVENTIONS

Influence of isovolumic fluid infusion type (saline vs. pentastarch) on these variables was assessed in 11 groups of six animals including an unchallenged control one.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Endotoxin injection induced a) myocardial dysfunction (decrease of approximately 15-20% in left ventricular ejection fraction); b) ventricular enlargement (approximately 1.5- to 1.7-fold increase in left ventricular systolic volume); c) cardiac output increase (10-15%); d) myocardial hypoperfusion ( approximately 1.5- to 2-fold decrease in acetate k1 constant rate); e) increased oxygen consumption (k2); and f) interstitial wall increase. Endotoxin injection also enhanced levels of arterial lactates and troponin I. Colloid (pentastarch) over crystalloid (saline) fluid resuscitation significantly reversed echocardiographic changes, some positron emission tomography imaging alterations, and lactate and troponin I levels without further enhancing interstitial spaces.

CONCLUSION

Endotoxin can induce reversible myocardial alterations with evidence of coronary hypoperfusion and heart wall enlargement/damage, some of which can be prevented by fluid resuscitation. The use of crystalloids is less beneficial than pentastarch.

Influence of hydroxyethyl starch on lipopolysaccharide-induced tissue nuclear factor kappa B activation and systemic TNF-alpha expression

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown beneficial effects of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on organ damage in the treatment of severe inflammatory situations, but the mechanisms remain unclear. Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) activation is known to contribute to many aspects of inflammatory injury and organ dysfunction in critical illness, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) is considered the most important pro-inflammatory cytokine. The present study was undertaken to test whether HES (200/0.5) has some effects on tissue NF-kappaB activity and systemic TNF-alpha expression induced by lipopolysaccharide in order to define a possible mechanism of the beneficial effects of HES.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats were randomly divided into seven groups treated with saline, lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 6 mg/kg), LPS plus HES (3.75, 7.5, 15, 30 ml/kg), or HES (30 ml/kg) alone. Two hours after LPS challenge, NF-kappaB activation in the lungs, hearts, livers, and kidneys were examined with an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Four hours after LPS challenge, plasma TNF-alpha concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbance assay.

RESULTS

3.75 and 7.5 ml/kg HES suppressed LPS-induced NF-kappaB activation in the four tissues and decreased plasma TNF-alpha elevation. The effects of 15 ml/kg HES was only significant in inhibiting NF-kappaB activity in the lung and liver. No effect of 30 ml/kg HES was revealed in all the cases.

CONCLUSION

Lower doses of HES may inhibit tissue NF-kappaB activation and systemic TNF-alpha elevation after LPS challenge, which might be helpful during sepsis.

A randomized unblinded pilot study comparing albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

The administration of albumin improves circulatory function, prevents hepatorenal syndrome, and reduces hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. This randomized unblinded pilot study compared the effect of albumin (10 patients) and the synthetic plasma expander hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 (10 patients) on the systemic hemodynamics of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Baseline measurements were performed within 12 hours after diagnosis of infection. Patients then received 2 doses of the volume expander (1.5 g/kg body weight after baseline measurements and 1 g/kg body weight on day 3). Measurements were repeated after infection resolution. Treatment with albumin was associated with a significant increase in arterial pressure and a suppression of plasma renin activity, indicating an improvement in circulatory function. This occurred in the setting of a significant expansion of central blood volume (increase in cardiopulmonary pressures and atrial natriuretic factor) and an increase in systolic volume and systemic vascular resistance. In contrast, no significant changes were observed in these parameters in patients treated with hydroxyethyl starch. Von Willebrand-related antigen plasma levels significantly decreased in patients treated with albumin but not in those treated with hydroxyethyl starch. Serum nitrates and nitrites increased in patients treated with hydroxyethyl starch but not in those treated with albumin. These data suggest an effect of albumin on endothelial function. In conclusion, albumin but not hydroxyethyl starch improves systemic hemodynamics in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. This effect is due not only to volume expansion but also to an action on the peripheral arterial circulation.

Drug-Induced Renal Failure in the ICU

Drug-induced renal failure is a frequent complication in the setting of ICU. Generally spoken pathomechanisms leading to drug-induced renal failure can be divided into hemodynamic effects, epithelial toxicity or crystalline nephropathy. The risk of drug-induced renal failure is increased by any form of hypovolemia (i.e. true hypovolemia or reduced effective circulating volume), older age, pre-existent renal impairment, and concomitant application of two or more nephrotoxins. This article reviews drugs most frequently responsible for renal failure in the ICU and discusses preventive measures. (Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27: 1034-42)

Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update

OBJECTIVE

To provide the American College of Critical Care Medicine with updated guidelines for hemodynamic support of adult patients with sepsis.

DATA SOURCE

Publications relevant to hemodynamic support of septic patients were obtained from the medical literature, supplemented by the expertise and experience of members of an international task force convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

STUDY SELECTION

Both human studies and relevant animal studies were considered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The experts articles reviewed the literature and classified the strength of evidence of human studies according to study design and scientific value. Recommendations were drafted and graded levels based on an evidence-based rating system described in the text. The recommendations were debated, and the task force chairman modified the document until <10% of the experts disagreed with the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

An organized approach to the hemodynamic support of sepsis was formulated. The fundamental principle is that clinicians using hemodynamic therapies should define specific goals and end points, titrate therapies to those end points, and evaluate the results of their interventions on an ongoing basis by monitoring a combination of variables of global and regional perfusion. Using this approach, specific recommendations for fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy, and inotropic therapy of septic in adult patients were promulgated.

[Hydroxyethylstarch (HES)]

Adequate volume replacement therapy is a mainstay of managing the critically ill. The ideal kind of volume replacement in this situation still remains a challenge. In spite of an immense number of contributions to this problem there is still no definite answer. The ideal volume replacement strategy should not only aim at maintaining stable systemic hemodynamics, organ perfusion and microcirculation should be guaranteed or even improved as well. Due to its excellent efficacy, hydroxyethylstarch (HES) preparations are widely used to treat hypovolemia. The different physico-chemical properties of the available HES solutions, however, should be taken into account. Anphylactoid reactions as well as negative effects on coagulation, kidney/liver function and on the immune system are frequently used arguments against the administration of HES, but they can virtually be neglected when using modern HES preparations to correct hypovolemia. There are, however, still open questions concerning the use of HES in children, pregnant patients, patients with altered kidney function and in burn patients.

Fluid choice for resuscitation of the trauma patient: a review of the physiological, pharmacological, and clinical evidence

PURPOSE

Volume replacement regimens are discussed very emotionally. Interpretation of the literature is difficult due to variations in study design, patient population, target for volume replacement, endpoints, and type of fluids. Meta-analyses may not be very helpful because all kinds of patients and very old studies are included. The principles and options for volume replacement were reviewed exclusively in trauma patients and studies from the literature focusing on this problem were analyzed.

SOURCE

Using a MEDLINE search, volume replacement therapy in adult trauma patients published in the English language from 1985 to the end of 2002 were identified and analyzed. Studies on prehospital volume replacement, volume replacement in the emergency area or in the operating room, and volume therapy in trauma intensive care unit patients were included.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

The age-old crystalloid/colloid controvery has still not been resolved but has been enlarged to a colloid/colloid debate. It is now widely accepted that human albumin could easily be replaced by synthetic colloids for volume replacement in trauma patients. No superiority of a specific volume replacement strategy with regard to outcome was found. However, in several studies outcome was not the major endpoint. Although showing some promising results, the importance of hypertonic solutions for volume replacement in the trauma patient is not yet defined.

CONCLUSION

The choice of fluid therapy in trauma patients engenders the most controversy and an examination of the body of literature on this subject results in confusion. It is imperative to continue the search for substances that are effective in avoiding the development of post-trauma multi-organ dysfunction syndrome without detrimental side-effects.

Human albumin and starch administration in critically ill patients: A prospective randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intravenous infusion of either human albumin or hydroxyethyl-starch (HES) in hypo-albuminemic critically ill may lead to an increase in colloid osmotic pressure and to a better clinical outcome, i.e. lower mortality and fewer complications, compared to fluid replacement with normal saline.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial during 72 hours in 61 consecutively admitted severely ill patients. Randomisation took place by sealed envelope, kept outside of the hospital.

SETTING

Intensive care unit of the Twenteborg Hospital, Almelo, The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

Sixty-three severely ill, hypo-albuminemic patients were selected; 27 patients had severe sepsis and 36 were post-surgical patients with SIRS. Two patients died shortly after randomization, 15 patients received human albumin, 15 HES 500 and 15 HES 1000 ml, and 16 saline.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomized to receive 300 ml human albumin (20%) per day, or 1000 ml normal saline per day, or 500 ml or 1000 ml HES per day, all for 72 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was plasma colloid osmotic pressure (COP). Secondary endpoints were fluid balance and the development of pulmonary edema.

RESULTS

Administration of human albumin was effective in raising COP (P<0.001 on day 2 and day 3, compared to saline and HES). Neither fluid balances nor the development of peripheral or pulmonary edema were different between the groups. Mortality as well as length of stay at ICU were slightly higher in the group receiving human albumin, although not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Raising colloid osmotic pressure with human albumin in hypoalbuminemic patients is not associated with improvement of the clinical outcome.

Prevention and nondialytic treatment of acute renal failure

Based on the progress made during the last few years in understanding the pathophysiology of acute renal failure, a plethora of therapeutic drug and nondrug interventions have been developed and tested in animal and human forms of this disease. The first part of this article focuses on the role of volume expansion and vasopressors in the prevention and treatment of acute renal failure in the critically ill. From all prophylactic measures that have been proposed, volume expansion, or at least correction of volume depletion, remains the most efficient and most evidence-based intervention in these patients. Norepinephrine is, out of all the vasopressors, probably the most appropriate to use in cases of hypotension, provided circulating volume is adequate. In hypotensive septic patients, vasopressin has been shown to be useful. Direct renal vasodilating substances, the most popular still being low-dose dopamine, have never been proved to be useful in carefully performed prospective trials. Moreover dopamine especially is associated with a number of side effects and complications. From the agents acting on tubular factors, the diuretic mannitol and loop diuretics are the most prescribed. Only in specific situations such as rhabdomyolysis and kidney transplant surgery has it been shown that mannitol was able to prevent acute renal failure. The loop diuretics are able, after establishing adequate circulating volume, to promote diuresis in some forms of oliguric acute renal failure; however, some recent papers have shown that the administration of loop diuretics may actually be associated with increased mortality and delayed recovery of renal function. The last few years have seen a number of trials with acetylcysteine in the prevention of mainly radiocontrast nephropathy. Although the results are still conflicting, the majority indicates that acetylcysteine, when applied together with adequate volume expansion, may be a useful drug to incorporate in the standard treatment procedures in patients at risk for acute renal failure. Interventions to stimulate the recovery process of the damaged kidney with growth factors, although theoretically sound, have thus far not led to successful results.

Hemorrhagic shock resuscitation with a low molecular weight starch reduces neutrophil-endothelial interactions and vessel leakage in vivo

BACKGROUND

The polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of endothelial cell (EC) damage and organ injury following hemorrhagic shock. Pentastarch (PTS), a low substituted medium molecular weight (MW) colloid, improves hemodynamics in hypovolemic shock and cardiac surgery. No data exist comparing the immunomodulation of PTS and Ringer's lactate (RL) on the activation of PMN in hemorrhagic shock in vivo.

METHODS

Using an in vivo murine hemorrhagic shock model (blood withdrawal to maintain 50 mmHg x 45 min), circulating PMN were observed every 15 minutes using intravital microscopy on cremaster muscle. EC-PMN interactions (videorecorded and subsequently analyzed blindly), vessel leakage (live epifluorescence after injection of 50 mg/kg fluorescent albumin) and PMN expression of L-selectin (immunofluorescent monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry) were evaluated in three resuscitation groups: PTS (7.14 mL/kg 10% pentastarch/0.9% NaCl + shed blood, n = 13), RL (RL [2 x shed blood volume] + shed blood, n = 13) and SHAM (0 hemorrhage, 0 resuscitation, n = 9). Significance was evaluated by ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

PMN rolling was significantly diminished in PTS and SHAM as compared to RL animals at all time points. Similar differences were found in PMN adherence to EC at most time points onwards from 15 minutes following resuscitation. In vivo vessel permeability was lowest in SHAM and PTS animals (mean 0.274 +/- 0.07 and 0.356 +/- 0.15, respectively, p > 0.05) and highest in RL animals (0.667 +/- 0.09, p < 0.001 vs PTS or SHAM). PMN L-selectin expression tended to be higher in the RL group than either SHAM and PTS groups. There were no flow-mechanics differences between groups (vessel diameter, mean red cell velocity, shear stress, shear rate).

CONCLUSIONS

10% pentastarch reduces RL-associated EC-PMN interactions and vessel leakage following hemorrhagic shock. These results support the use of low MW starches to resuscitate hemorrhagic shock, potentially reducing PMN-mediated tissue injury.