Healing results of meniscal tears left in situ during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of clinical studies

Partial Meniscectomy Increases Risk of ACL Revision Surgery Compared to Meniscus Repair in Patients with Concurrent Meniscus and ACL Tears after ACL Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare the rates of revision ACL reconstruction, meniscal reoperation, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) associated with partial meniscectomy and meniscal repair performed at the time of index ACL reconstruction in patients with concurrent meniscus and ACL tears.

METHODS

The TriNetX database was queried for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction following January 1, 2000, with minimum one year clinical follow up. Inclusion criteria for this study were patients who had partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair, or isolated ACL reconstruction without meniscus injury. Statistical analyses were performed using Python with significance thresholds of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 39,126 patients were followed for an average of 5.02 years. Patients undergoing meniscal repair were less likely to experience revision ACL reconstruction compared to those undergoing partial meniscectomy (RR: 0.78, CI: 0.71-0.85, p < 0.001). Meniscus reoperation occurred significantly more in patients undergoing meniscal repair (RR: 1.26, CI: 1.17-1.35, p = <0.001) than those undergoing partial meniscectomy. Regarding TKA, partial meniscectomy carried a more than sixfold increased risk compared to isolated ACL reconstruction (RR: 6.4, CI: 2.49-16.42, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACL injury, ACL reconstruction, and concurrent meniscus tear, those patients treated with meniscus repair were less likely to undergo revision surgery. In these patients, medial meniscal injuries were associated with ACL revision than lateral meniscal injury regardless of the method of treatment. When meniscus repair is performed, this is associated with lower rate of future total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Retrospective Cohort Study.

Arthroscopic meniscal surgery in Norway from 2010 to 2020: A paradigmatic shift

Purpose

Meniscal injuries in the knee are usually treated surgically with arthroscopic partial resection (APR) or arthroscopic repair (AR). APR has been shown to increase the risk of osteoarthritis and the focus has shifted to repairing the meniscus with AR. The extent of this shift is yet to be established and an analysis of incidence rates (IR) of APR and AR for meniscal injuries could highlight this.

Methods

Data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) and Statistics Norway (SN) from 2010 to 2020 were collected. The number of procedures, demographics and facilities providing meniscal surgery were obtained from NPR, while population size and catchment area were collected from SN. IR of APR and AR and APR/AR rate ratios were estimated and compared.

Results

A total of 119,528 knee arthroscopies were performed, 89.6% of which were APR. The number of APR performed nationally decreased by 72%, while AR procedures increased by 178%. The national IR of APR decreased from 298 to 82/100,000 inhabitants (p < 0.001). For AR, the national IR increased annually from 13/100,000 inhabitants to a peak in 2019 of 32/100,000 inhabitants (p < 0.001). The APR/AR rate ratio decreased from 22 to below five and the APR/AR trend curves showed a statistically significant decrease (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of meniscal injuries has changed, with a substantial reduction in APR and a strong increase in AR. The reduction in APR, especially in older patients, suggests that meniscal surgery in Norway has undergone a paradigmatic shift, in line with recent literature.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

The fate of unrepaired stable ramp lesions: a systematic review

This study was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses) guidelines. PubMed and Medline databases were searched in October 2023 for studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and stable medial meniscal ramp lesion treatment. Studies focused on diagnostic approaches, biomechanical properties, unstable ramp lesions, isolated ramp lesions, and concomitant intraarticular/extraarticular pathologies other than ACL rupture are excluded. A total of 314 studies were obtained after the initial search. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Data from 186 stable medial meniscal ramp lesions that were left unrepaired were retrieved. At the last follow-up, mean preoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly improved and similar with repair patients and no ramp lesion patients, postoperatively. Healing rate was reported between 58.6% and 87.8%. Knee stability was similar in repaired and nonrepaired patients and a ramp existed and no ramp lesion patients. Although the return to sports rate was similar between ramp existed and no ramp lesion patients, the time to return to sports was higher in ramp existed patients than no ramp patients. Improved functional outcome scores, similar healing rates, knee stability, and return to sports rates can be obtained in repaired and nonrepaired patients as well as ramp lesions existing and no ramp lesion patients when the stable ramp lesions are left unrepaired. The time to return to sport is significantly higher than no ramp lesion patients. Level of Evidence III.

A case report of simultaneous tears of the medial and lateral posterior meniscal roots with an intact ACL graft

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Meniscal root tears are defined as soft-tissue and/or osseous injuries that rip or avulse within one centimeter of the meniscal insertion to the tibial plateau. These injuries impact around 100,000 patients a year and make up 10 % to 21 % of all meniscal tears. Meniscal extrusion frequently happens when there are root rips, and the transmission of circumferential hoop loads is hampered.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present one case of a 28-year-old male who complained of pain and stiffness in his left knee since 2 years after undergoing ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft. His examination revealed joint line tenderness on both the medial and lateral sides of the left knee. Further investigations involving X-ray and MRI established the diagnosis of both medial and lateral meniscal root tears, which were surgically managed using the transtibial pullout technique.

DISCUSSION

The biomechanical implications of meniscal root tears, such as loss of hoop forces and increased tibiofemoral contact pressures, underscore the importance of timely diagnosis and management. The literature advocates surgical treatment for managing root tears, as leaving them without surgical intervention can lead to functional outcomes similar to those of total meniscectomy.

CONCLUSION

This case report presents both menisci posterior root tears with an intact ACL graft which is unique in that they commonly tear in conjuction with ACL. These kind of injuries necessitates prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention to protect the knee from early arthritic changes.

Editorial Commentary: A Gap-Based Subclassification of Ramp Lesions Has the Potential to Enhance Treatment Precision and Patient Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees Subtitle: Customizing Solutions for Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees

Our evolving understanding of ramp lesions has significantly affected the field of anterior cruciate ligament injury and meniscal repair. Although these lesions have been linked consistently to increased anterior and rotational instability in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees, there remains a contentious debate regarding their optimal treatment. The current literature is divided, as some advocate for surgical repair of only arthroscopically unstable lesions. Others point to a substantial risk of complications, noting a 28.6% incidence in untreated stable lesions, and thus advocate for surgical repair of all lesions. Through the use of magnetic resonance imaging scans of flexed knees, a novel subclassification of ramp lesions based on gap distance at the tear site shows a correlation with posterior capsular displacement, anterior laxity, lesion size, and joint effusion. This nuanced classification offers new insights and promises to refine treatment decisions, potentially minimizing unnecessary surgeries and improving patient outcomes.

Clinical and MRI Outcomes of Repaired Peripheral Longitudinal Tears of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus With ACL Reconstruction: Results According to Tear Size

Background

Arthroscopic repair of longitudinal tears in the medial meniscal posterior horn (MMPH) has been reported to result in high rates of meniscal healing when performed alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, studies that have focused on longitudinal tears and their impact on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair are insufficient.

Purpose

To investigate the clinical outcome and healing status after concomitant arthroscopic ACLR and repair of MMPH peripheral longitudinal tears, with respect to the tear length.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 263 patients who underwent concurrent arthroscopic suture repair of longitudinal tears of the MMPH and ACLR were enrolled. All patients had 2-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations, and 61% of patients underwent a second-look arthroscopy. The exclusion criteria were partial meniscectomies and multiligament injuries. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively for clinical scores, amount of anterior translation, grade of pivot shift, and presence of meniscal tear extension. According to the length of longitudinal tears, patients were classified into 2 groups: (1) patients with tears that were located in the posterior compartment and (2) patients with tears that extended to the midbody of the meniscus. Binary stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for unhealed menisci as identified by MRI.

Results

A total of 83 patients were included in this study-52 patients (group 1) had MMPH tears without tear extension and 31 patients (group 2) had MMPH tears with tear extension. There were no differences in outcomes between the groups, including the healing rate after meniscal repair (P > .05). Based on postoperative MRI scans, 67 patients (80.7%) were categorized as completely healed and 16 patients (19.3%) as unhealed. There were no significant differences between the completely healed and unhealed groups in outcomes or the rate of preoperative midbody tear extension. Higher body mass index and lower preoperative Lysholm scores were identified as risk factors for unhealed menisci.

Conclusion

Overall, the rate of complete healing of MMPH tears repaired concomitantly with ACLR was 80.7% (67/83), and midbody tear extension did not affect the healing rate of the repaired meniscus. Results indicate that suture repair for unstable MMPH tears should be considered regardless of tear size.

Meniscus tears treatment: The good, the bad and the ugly-patterns classification and practical guide

Over the years, several studies demonstrated the crucial role of knee menisci in joint biomechanics. As a result, save the meniscus has become the new imperative nowadays, and more and more studies addressed this topic. The huge amount of data on this topic may create confusion in those who want to approach this surgery. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for treatment of meniscus tears, including an overview of technical aspects, outcomes in the literature and personal tips. Taking inspiration from a famous movie directed by Sergio Leone in 1966, the authors classified meniscus tears in three categories: The good, the bad and the ugly lesions. The inclusion in each group was determined by the lesion pattern, its biomechanical effects on knee joint, the technical challenge, and prognosis. This classification is not intended to substitute the currently proposed classifications on meniscus tears but aims at offering a reader-friendly narrative review of an otherwise difficult topic. Furthermore, the authors provide a concise premise to deal with some aspects of menisci phylogeny, anatomy and biomechanics.

Low reoperation rate following lateral meniscus root repair: clinical outcomes at 2 years follow-up

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of lateral meniscus posterior root tears repair at the time of ACL reconstruction at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Between March 2015 and August 2018, 2017 patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction and were considered for study eligibility. Lateral meniscus posterior root tears were identified arthroscopically, and repair was performed with a transtibial pull-out suture technique or a side-to-side suture technique. Clinical outcomes were recorded at the time of physical examination. At the end of the study period, patients were contacted to determine whether they had required reoperation.

RESULTS

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears were identified in 153 out of the 2,017 primary ACL reconstructions (7.6%). Ninety-nine patients were included for analysis: 23 transtibial pull-out sutures and 76 side-to-side repairs. At a mean follow-up of 42 ± 10 months, one patient (1%) had undergone reoperation for failure of the side-to-side repair. There were 11 reoperations in 10 patients (10.1%), including 6 cyclops syndrome, 1 graft rupture, 1 tibial bone cyst, 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscus repair failure, and 1 arthrolysis. Postoperatively, ninety (90.9%) patients were graded A for the IKDC objective score and 9 (9.1%) patients were graded B, with an IKDC subjective score of 86.9 ± 7.6, a Lysholm score of 90.7 ± 6.7 and a median Tegner Activity Scale of 6 (3-9). All of their objective and subjective evaluations improved after surgery (p < 0.001) except for the Tegner Activity Scale. Ten patients underwent second look arthroscopy (10.1%), lateral meniscus healing was observed in 9 out of 10 patients (90%).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that lateral meniscus posterior root tear repair is a safe procedure with a very low reoperation rate at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lateral Meniscal Lesions: A Consensus Statement by the Chinese Society of Sports Medicine

BACKGROUND

The lateral meniscus is a unique structure of the knee joint, and its anatomy, function, pathological process, and treatment are distinct from those of the medial meniscus. To date, no consensus on the management of lateral meniscal lesions has been published, and clinical decision-making is challenging. To facilitate this, consensus and practice guidelines for lateral meniscal lesions were developed and endorsed by the Chinese Society of Sports Medicine.

STUDY DESIGN

Consensus statement.

METHODS

This project followed the Delphi approach to the consensus process, involving steering, rating, and peer review groups. A total of 61 experts in the fields of sports medicine and arthroscopic surgery were invited to participate in the compilation of a consensus statement on lateral meniscal lesions. (The discoid lateral meniscus was addressed by separate consensus.) To begin, the steering group drafted a set of questions and replies regarding lateral meniscal lesions. An online panel discussion was then held to provide initial agreement and comments on the statements, followed by a round of anonymous voting. Results and feedback were sent to the steering group for a second draft. A second round of voting was then held, and each statement was discussed during a combined meeting of the steering and rating groups. Finally, a consensus draft was evaluated by a review group.

RESULTS

Fifty-three questions and answers addressing lateral meniscal lesions were drafted, and 20 statements were excluded because of redundant information during the first round of voting. Ultimately, 33 statements were completed, 9 of which were unanimous.

CONCLUSION

This expert consensus process focused on the anatomy, function, pathological processes, and treatment of lateral meniscal lesions. Accepted recommendations in these areas can assist doctors and therapists in standardizing the management of related pathology. The consensus statement indicates that certain types of lateral meniscal tears that were previously considered irreparable can be repaired. Preservation of the lateral meniscus should be the first-line treatment whenever possible, because the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes are worse after partial meniscectomy.

Long-term Natural History of Unrepaired Stable Ramp Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis of 28 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up of 20 Years

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus about whether stable ramp lesions associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries need to be repaired.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how many stable ramp lesions left in situ during ACL reconstruction (ACLR) have subsequently failed after >20 years of follow-up. We hypothesized that ACL-reconstructed knees with ramp lesions left in situ without repair have a high risk of meniscal failure over the long term.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

All patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR by a single experienced surgeon between January 1998 and December 2000 were evaluated retrospectively. Included were all cases of longitudinal tears in the meniscocapsular junction or the red zone of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus that were left in situ and identified through the anterior portals. Successful anterior probing confirmed a meniscal tear of the posterior segment. A lesion was considered stable if it was ≤2 cm and did not extend beyond the lower pole of the femoral condyle. The following data were collected preoperatively and at the last follow-up: demographics, time to surgery, side-to-side laxity, pivot shift, Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner activity scale, and meniscal failure rate. We defined 2 groups based on our findings: medial meniscal failure versus no medial meniscal failure.

RESULTS

A total of 716 knees underwent primary ACLR during this period. The 39 (5.4%) stable unrepaired ramp lesions identified were included in the case series. Mean ± standard deviation follow-up was 262.1 ± 10.5 months. Eleven patients (28%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients, 8 (28.6%) had a medial meniscal failure, of which 6 (21.4%) were bucket-handle tears. The average time elapsed before complications was 87.8 ± 52 months (range, 6-156 months). The medial meniscal survival rate was 93% at 5 years, 75% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 and 20 years. The failure event mainly happened between 96 and 120 months (8 and 10 years) after ACLR. No risk factors for failure were found, but some trends appeared, such as older age, higher body mass index, and preoperative rotational instability. All postoperative scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < .0001); 16 patients (57%) returned to their sport of choice.

CONCLUSION

With nearly one-third of patients developing meniscal complications, including a large share of bucket-handle tears and mostly occurring 8 years after the ACLR, it may not be wise to leave stable ramp lesions unrepaired.

Meniscal Tear Management Associated with ACL Reconstruction

Meniscal lesions often occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears at the moment of the injury or, secondarily, as a consequence of knee instability. Both ACL and meniscus lesions are associated with a higher risk of osteoarthritis. Adequate treatment of these lesions reduces the rate of degenerative changes in the affected knee. Meniscal tears should be addressed concomitantly with ACL reconstruction and the treatment must be oriented towards preserving the meniscal tissue anytime this is possible. Several options for approaching a meniscus tear are available. The meniscal suture should always be considered, and, if possible, meniscectomy should be the last choice. “Masterly neglect” is a valuable option in selected cases.

The Cell-Material Interaction in the Replacement and Regeneration of the Meniscus: A Mini-Review

The meniscus is a part of the knee joint consisting of a medial and lateral component between the femoral condyles and the tibial plateau. Meniscal tears usually happen in younger and active people due to sports or daily activities. Some approaches are chosen for meniscus replacement and regeneration from the problems above, such as meniscal repair, meniscal allograft transplantation, gene therapy techniques, and tissue engineering techniques. Biomaterials and tissue engineering have a primary role in meniscus regeneration and replacement. The cell-material interactions are influenced by the biomaterials' design, structure, and composition to promote the growth o meniscus tissue. This study aims to give a brief review of the cell-material interaction in the replacement and regeneration process of the meniscus. Based on several studies, the use of growth factors in the meniscal regeneration and replacement could modulate and promote angiogenesis, differentiation, and cell migration beneficial in the repair process of the meniscus. Furthermore, combining the Mesenchymal Stem Cells and growth factors in healing the meniscal tears could be one of the best approaches to obtaining the new tissue resembling the meniscal tissue. The follow-up and long-term studies in meniscus regeneration and replacement are needed and recommended, especially implanting with good chondroprotective and long-term evaluation to obtain the best properties similar to the natural meniscus.

Sensitivity of DECT in ACL tears. A prospective study with arthroscopy as reference method

Background

CT is often used for fracture evaluation following knee trauma and to diagnose ACL injuries would also be valuable.

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of dual energy CT (DECT) for detection of ACL tears in acute and subacute knee injuries.

Material and Methods

Patients with suspected ACL injury were imaged with DECT and MRI. Clinically blinded DECT images were independently read twice by two radiologists. ACL was classified as normal or abnormal. Arthroscopy served as reference method. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated, and diagnostic performance between DECT and MRI was assessed.

Results

48 patients (26 M, 22 F, mean age 23 years, range 15–37 years) were imaged with a mean of 25 days following trauma. Of these, 21 patients underwent arthroscopy with a mean of 195 days after trauma. Arthroscopy revealed 19 ACL tears and 2 ACLs with no tear. The combined sensitivity was 76.3% (95% CI 66.8–85.9) and 86.8 (95% CI 71.9–95.6) for DECT and MRI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between these two methods ( p = .223). The positive predictive value (PPV) was 93.5 (95% CI 84.3–98.2) and 91.7 (95% CI 77.5–98.3) for DECT and MRI, respectively.

Conclusion

DECT has lower sensitivity to detect an ACL rupture than MRI, but the difference is not statistically significant. The PPV is high in both methods.

Association Between Knee Alignment and Meniscal Tear in Pediatric Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the association between elapsed time from anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury to surgical treatment and the incidence of meniscal tears in a cohort of patients ≤16 years old with varus-aligned and non-varus-aligned knees.

METHODS

The study cohort included 123 patients ≤16 years old who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and March 2020. Knee alignment was expressed as the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), as measured preoperatively on an anteroposterior view of 3-dimensional computed tomography of the full length of the lower limb. Varus alignment was defined as an HKAA ≥181.0°, and non-varus alignment was defined as an HKAA <181.0°. Patients were divided into groups according to knee alignment and the elapsed time from injury to surgical treatment: early-treatment group (<60 days) and delayed-treatment group (≥60 days).

RESULTS

A total of 64 varus-aligned and 59 non-varus-aligned knees were identified. Among patients with varus-aligned knees, those in the delayed-treatment group showed a significantly lower rate of lateral meniscal tears (6 of 30, 20%) compared with those in the early-treatment group (17 of 34, 50%; p = 0.015). Among patients with non-varus-aligned knees, there was no significant difference in meniscal tears of any type between the early and delayed-treatment groups. Among patients without medial meniscal injury identified on initial magnetic resonance imaging, those with varus-aligned knees in the delayed-treatment group showed a significantly higher rate of medial meniscal tears at the time of the surgical procedure (8 of 20, 40%) compared with those with non-varus-aligned knees (1 of 18, 6%; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed ACL reconstruction in patients ≤16 years old with varus-aligned knees might be associated with an increased incidence of secondary medial meniscal tears. Accordingly, earlier ACL reconstruction in patients with varus-aligned knees should be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthroscopic incidence of lateral meniscal root avulsion in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury

Background

To arthroscopically evaluate the incidence of lateral meniscal root avulsion (LMRA) and associated intra-articular injuries in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

From April 2014 to March 2017, 532 consecutive patients were diagnosed as having an ACL injury and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The diagnosis of LMRA was made arthroscopically. The effects of gender, activity, grade of laxity, time from injury, and concomitant meniscal lesions were analyzed.

Results

Among 532 patients, 497 (93.4%) underwent primary ACL reconstruction and 35 (6.5%) underwent revision procedures. 383 were acute or subacute injuries (less than 6 months from injury to surgery) and 149 chronic (more than 6 months). Average age was 30.4 years (DS: ± 11.04); there were 422 (79.3%) males and 110 (20.6%) females. A LMRA associated with the ACL injury was detected in 72 cases (13.5%), with a significant prevalence observed in males (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi ^2}$$\end{document}χ2 = 4.65; P = 0.031, statistically significant). In the 149 patients with a chronic injury, 27 patients had LMRA (18.1%), while 45 of the 383 patients with an acute or subacute injury had LMRA (11.7%). There was a tendency, albeit not significant (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi ^2}$$\end{document}χ2 = 3.721; P = 0.054), for the prevalence to increase with time since the initial ACL injury. LMRA was significantly associated (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\chi ^2}$$\end{document}χ2 = 7.81; P = 0.006) with a meniscocapsular tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (ramp lesion). No other significant associations, such as with severity of A-P translation (as measured by KT-2000) or activity level, were detected.

Conclusion

LMRA is a relatively common injury associated with both acute and chronic ACL tears. A relatively high incidence in cases of chronic ACL insufficiency suggests that LMRAs do not heal spontaneously or that they may appear with time, even when absent at the time of the initial injury.

Level of evidence

Level III, cross-sectional study.

Outcomes More Than 2 Years After Meniscal Repair for Longitudinal Tears of the Lateral Meniscus Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Meniscal function after repair of longitudinal tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has not been comprehensively investigated.

PURPOSE

To evaluate not only the clinical outcomes and radiographic findings of patients who underwent repair of longitudinal tears of the LM combined with ACLR but also the healing status of the repaired meniscus and changes in chondral status with second-look arthroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Among 548 patients who underwent primary anatomic ACLR at our institution between 2010 and 2017, 39 who had concomitant longitudinal tears of the LM and underwent repair were studied. During follow-up for more than 2 years, all patients were evaluated clinically (pain, range of motion, swelling, and knee instability) and with imaging (plain radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), and compared with a matched control group (based on age, sex, body mass index, and follow-up period) without any concomitant injuries who underwent ACLR. Measurements on MRI were recorded preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at final follow-up, and the change in the values over time was assessed. Of the 39 patients in each group, 24 were assessed by second-look arthroscopy with hardware removal 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up times of the study and control group were at a mean of 42.4 and 45.4 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical findings, lateral joint space narrowing on radiographs, and chondral status at the lateral compartment between groups, whereas lateral and posterior meniscal extrusion on MRI progressed significantly in the study group (0.43 ± 1.0 mm vs -0.29 ± 1.1 mm, P = .003; 1.9 ± 1.9 mm vs 0.14 ± 1.1 mm, P < .0001, respectively). Second-look arthroscopy revealed complete healing in 12 patients (50%), partial healing in 9 (37.5%), and failure in 3 (12.5%) in the study group, and no new tear in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical and imaging outcomes after repair of longitudinal tears of the LM combined with anatomic ACLR were successful and comparable with those after isolated ACLR without any other injuries at 42 months postoperatively, although meniscal extrusion showed progression on coronal/sagittal MRI. Based on the MRI findings and the result that only half of patients achieved complete healing, meniscal function could not be fully restored even after repair. Although degenerative changes were not apparent, longer-term follow-up is needed.

Steep posterior slope of the medial tibial plateau is associated with ramp lesions of the medial meniscus and a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament injury

Background

Medial meniscus (MM) tears are associated with both acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency and can lead to degenerative changes in the knee. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) combined with the meniscal repair was reported to result in decreased anterior knee joint laxity with evidence of improved patient-reported outcomes in the long term. However, a subtle tear of the MM posterior segment, also known as a ramp lesion, is difficult to detect on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and is frequently missed in ACL-deficient knees. However, there are few studies about the associations between bone geometry and ramp lesion of the MM. This study aimed to compare sagittal medial tibial slope (MTS), medial tibial plateau depth (MTPD), and coronal tibial slope (CTS) between ACL-injured knees with and without ramp lesion of the MM. We hypothesised that patients with ramp lesion of the MM and a concomitant ACL injury have a steeper MTS and shallower MTPD than those without ramp lesion of the MM.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients who underwent ACLR (group A), and 15 patients with combined MM repair (group AM) were included in the study. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was measured under general anaesthesia just before surgery using a knee arthrometer. MRI was performed in the 10°-knee-flexed position. The MTS and MTPD were measured on sagittal view, and the CTS was measured on coronal view. These parameters were compared between the groups. Differences in MRI measurements or patient demographics between the groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

No significant difference was observed in demographic data and post-operative side-to-side difference in ATT between both groups. Pre-operative ATT was significantly higher in group AM than in group A (P < 0.05), whereas post-operative ATT was similar in both groups. Further, Pre-operative ATT was significantly higher in patients with MTS ≥5.0° than in those with MTS <5.0° (P < 0.05). In groups A and AM, the MTS were 3.6° ± 1.8° and 6.2° ± 2.9°, the MTPD were 2.0 ± 0.5 mm and 2.1 ± 0.6 mm, and the CTS were 2.5° ± 1.8° and 2.4° ± 1.6°, respectively. Patients in group AM had a significantly steeper MTS compared to those in group A (P < 0.01), whereas MTPD and CTS were nearly the same in both groups. When the MTS cut-off value was set at 5.0°, the sensitivity and specificity for ACL injury with concomitant ramp lesion of the MM were 0.73 and 0.76, respectively.

Conclusion

A steep posterior slope of the medial tibial plateau is a risk factor for ramp lesion of the MM associated with an ACL injury. Especially in patients with MTS ≥5.0°, an occult MM ramp lesion should be strongly suspected, and surgeons should prepare for MM repair in combination with ACLR.

What Is the Relationship Between the Distal Semimembranosus Tendon and the Medial Meniscus? A Gross and Microscopic Analysis From the SANTI Study Group

BACKGROUND

Some authors have suggested that the semimembranosus tendon is involved in the pathophysiology of ramp lesions. This led us to conduct a gross and microscopic analysis of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and the structures inserted on it.

HYPOTHESIS

(1) The semimembranosus tendon has a tendinous branch inserting into the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, and (2) the meniscotibial ligament is inserted on the posteroinferior edge of the medial meniscus.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

In total, 14 fresh cadaveric knees were dissected. From each cadaveric donor, a stable anatomic specimen was harvested en bloc, including the medial femoral condyle, medial tibial plateau, whole medial meniscus, cruciate ligaments, joint capsule, and distal insertion of the semimembranosus tendon. The harvested blocks were cut along the sagittal plane to isolate the distal insertion of the semimembranosus tendon on the posterior joint capsule and the posterior horn of the medial meniscus in a single slice. Histological slides were made from these samples and analyzed under a microscope.

RESULTS

In all knees, gross examination revealed a direct branch of the semimembranosus and a tendinous capsular branch ending behind the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. This capsular branch protruded over the joint capsule, over the meniscotibial ligament below and the meniscocapsular ligament above, but never ended directly in the meniscal tissue. The capsular branch was 14.3 ± 4.4 mm long (mean ± SD). The direct tendon inserted 11 ± 2.8 mm below the articular surface of the tibial plateau. The meniscotibial ligament inserted on the posteroinferior edge of the medial meniscus, and the meniscocapsular ligament insertion was on its posterosuperior edge. Highly vascularized adipose tissue was found, delimited by the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, meniscotibial ligament, meniscocapsular ligament, and capsular branch of the semimembranosus tendon.

CONCLUSION

In all knees, our study found a capsular branch of the semimembranosus tendon inserted behind the medial meniscus. The meniscotibial ligament was inserted on the posteroinferior edge of the medial meniscus. Histological analysis of this area revealed that this ligament inserted differently from the insertion previously described in the literature.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This laboratory study provides insight into the pathophysiology of ramp lesions frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury. To restore anatomy, it is mandatory to reestablish meniscotibial ligament continuity in ramp repairs.

Incidence of Medial and Lateral Meniscal Tears After Delayed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients

Background:

The treatment of pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is controversial, and no clear management guidelines have been established.

Purpose:

To evaluate the association between elapsed time from ACL injury to surgery and the incidence of meniscal tears and chondral injuries in patients aged ≤16 years.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Between December 2012 and April 2019, a total of 207 consecutive knees in 207 patients aged ≤16 years underwent primary ACL reconstruction and were included in this study. Patients were divided into 1 of 2 groups (early group [≤150 days] and delayed group [>150 days]) based on the time between injury and surgery. Patient records, including arthroscopic findings identified by 2 experienced knee surgeons at the time of surgery, were reviewed for demographic information, incidence and types of medial and lateral meniscal tears, and chondral injuries and their locations in each group.

Results:

There were 180 knees in the early group and 27 knees in the delayed group. The delayed group showed a significantly higher rate of medial meniscal tears than the early group: 16 of 27 (59.2%) and 46 of 180 (25.6%), respectively (odds ratio [OR], 4.24 [95% CI, 1.83-9.33]; P = .0011). The delayed group had a significantly lower rate of lateral meniscal tears than the early group: 6 of 27 (22.2%) and 90 of 180 (50.0%), respectively (OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.11-0.70]; P = .007). The delayed group had significantly higher rates of chondral injuries in the medial femoral condyle and the medial tibial plateau than the early group: 8 of 27 (29.6%) and 25 of 180 (13.9%), respectively (OR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.03-6.62]; P = .049), and 2 of 27 (7.4%) and 1 of 180 (0.6%), respectively (OR, 14.32 [95% CI, 1.58-208.10]; P = .045).

Conclusion:

Delayed ACL reconstruction was associated with an increased incidence of medial chondral injuries and medial meniscal tears but with a decreased incidence of lateral meniscal tears.

Examining Techniques for Treatment of Medial Meniscal Ramp Lesions During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the clinical outcomes and adverse events among different techniques for treatment of medial meniscal ramp lesions performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, Web of Science, and Medline databases were searched for studies examining clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of ramp lesions. Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: (1) evaluation of the outcome of surgical repair of meniscal ramp lesions, (2) injuries associated with ACL tears, (3) minimum 6-month follow up, (4) publication in a peer-reviewed journal, and (5) English language or translation readily available.

RESULTS

Seven studies met inclusion criteria (485 patients; mean age 27.1 years [range 12 to 59]; mean follow-up 26.9 months [range 8 to 40]). Two all-inside techniques (suture-hook and an all-inside meniscus repair device) in addition to abrasion and trephination alone were analyzed. Each technique demonstrated significant increases in postoperative Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, reaching the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each patient reported outcome. Incomplete healing was documented in 12.1% to 12.9% of cases in which the tear was not repaired at the time of ACL reconstruction, 2.3% to 11.7% in cases using the suture-hook for repair, and 10.8% to 15% in the all-inside meniscus repair device group.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrated that several approaches used to treat medial meniscal ramp lesions associated with ACL tears lead to positive clinical outcomes. Small, stable tears <2 cm in size may be managed with debridement alone. For larger, more unstable lesions, an all-inside approach has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. Prospective trials are needed to determine the best management for meniscal ramp lesions. Additionally, further research is needed to better understand how to minimize the risk of technique-related complications (e.g., improper implant deployment).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level II, III, and IV studies.

Ramp lesions: a systematic review of MRI diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy

Purpose

We conducted a systematic review of the published literature to assess the accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in establishing the presence of ramp lesions (RLs) in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) deficient knees and the clinical efficacy of the surgical repair of RLs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing MRI diagnostic accuracy for RLs or the clinical effect of RL repair in participants with ACL injuries were included. Diagnostic accuracy measures were pooled and plotted in forest plots. Preoperative and at last follow-up treatment efficacy outcome measures were extracted and plotted in forest plots, for graphical comprehension.

Results

Sixteen studies met the criteria and were included. The diagnostic analysis showed a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 65.1% (95% CI, 59.73 to 70.42), 91.6% (95% CI, 89.14 to 94.05), 2.91 (95% CI, 2.38–3.55) and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.44–0.64), respectively, with high heterogeneity (I² above 80%) for all measures. Treatment analysis showed improved Lysholm Knee Score, IKDC score and laxity difference between the knees in all studies after meniscal suture repair. A separate analysis showed no differences between repair of smaller, stable, RLs with meniscal sutures and repair with abrasion and trephination only.

Conclusion

Although the results present considerable heterogeneity, MRI seems to demonstrate moderate accuracy in the diagnosis of RLs in patients with ACL tear and the surgical repair of RLs can be associated with improved overall outcomes.

Ramp Lesions: An Unrecognized Posteromedial Instability?

Meniscal ramp lesions occur much more frequently than was previously considered, and particularly so in ACL-injured knees. The historically high rate of missed diagnoses is a result of unfamiliarity with this injury pattern within the orthopedic community, and also the difficulty in diagnosis. A systematic exploration of the posteromedial compartment of the knee is mandatory to reliably identify ramp lesions. Failure to recognize and repair these injuries is associated with persistent anterior and posteromedial instability. Understanding their nature, biomechanics, and epidemiology is essential in allowing orthopedic surgeons to suspect their presence and adequately treat these lesions.

Management of traumatic meniscus tears: the 2019 ESSKA meniscus consensus

PURPOSE

The importance of meniscus integrity in the prevention of early osteoarthritis is well known, and preservation is accepted as the primary goal. The purpose of the ESSKA (European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy) European consensus on traumatic meniscus tears was to provide recommendations for the treatment of meniscus tears based on both scientific evidence and the clinical experience of knee experts.

METHODS

Three groups of surgeons and scientists elaborated and ratified the so-called formal consensus process to define the recommendations for the management of traumatic meniscus tears. A traumatic meniscus tear was defined as a tear with an acute onset of symptoms caused by a sufficient trauma. The expert groups included a steering group of eight European surgeons and scientists, a rating group of another nineteen European surgeons, and a peer review group. The steering group prepared twenty-seven question and answer sets based on the scientific literature. The quality of the answers received grades of A (a high level of scientific support), B (scientific presumption), C (a low level of scientific support) or D (expert opinion). These question and answer sets were then submitted to and evaluated by the rating group. All answers were scored from 1 (= totally inappropriate) to 9 (= totally appropriate) points. Thereafter, the comments of the members of the rating group were incorporated by the steering group and the consensus was submitted to the rating group a second time. Once a general consensus was reached between the steering and rating groups, the finalized question and answer sets were submitted for final review by the peer review group composed of representatives of the ESSKA-affiliated national societies. Eighteen representatives replied.

RESULTS

The review of the literature revealed a rather low scientific quality of studies examining the treatment of traumatic meniscus tears. Of the 27 questions, only one question received a grade of A (a high level of scientific support), and another received a grade of B (scientific presumption). The remaining questions received grades of C and D. The mean rating of all questions by the rating group was 8.2 (95% confidence interval 8.1-8.4). A general agreement that MRI should be performed on a systematic basis was not achieved. However, MRI was recommended when arthroscopy would be considered to identify concomitant pathologies. In this case, the indication for MRI should be determined by a musculoskeletal specialist. Based on our data, stable left in situ lateral meniscus tears appear to show a better prognosis than medial tears. When repair is required, surgery should be performed as early as possible. Evidence that biological enhancement such as needling or the application of platelet-rich plasma would improve healing was not identified. Preservation of the meniscus should be considered as the first line of treatment because of an inferior clinical and radiological long-term outcome after partial meniscectomy compared to meniscus repair.

DISCUSSION

The consensus was generated to present the best possible recommendations for the treatment of traumatic meniscus tears and provides some groundwork for a clinical decision-making process regarding the treatment of meniscus tears. Preservation of the meniscus should be the first line of treatment when possible, because the clinical and radiological long-term outcomes are worse after partial meniscectomy than after meniscus preservation. The consensus clearly states that numerous meniscus tears that were considered irreparable should be repaired, e.g., older tears, tears in obese patients, long tears, etc. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Epidemiological Evaluation of Meniscal Ramp Lesions in 3214 Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knees From the SANTI Study Group Database: A Risk Factor Analysis and Study of Secondary Meniscectomy Rates Following 769 Ramp Repairs

BACKGROUND

Ramp lesions are characterized by disruption of the peripheral meniscocapsular attachments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Ramp repair performed at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to improve knee biomechanics.

PURPOSE

The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for ramp lesions among a large series of patients undergoing ACLR. Secondary objectives were to determine the reoperation rate for failure of ramp repair, defined by subsequent reoperations for partial medial meniscectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

All patients underwent transnotch posteromedial compartment evaluation of the knee during ACLR. Ramp repair was performed if a lesion was detected. Potentially important risk factors were analyzed for their association with ramp lesions. A secondary analysis of all patients who underwent ramp repair and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years was undertaken to determine the secondary partial meniscectomy rate for failed ramp repair.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of ramp lesions in the study population was 23.9% (769 ramp lesions among 3214 patients). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of ramp lesions was significantly associated with the following risk factors: male sex, patients aged <30 years, revision ACLR, chronic injuries, preoperative side-to-side laxity >6 mm, and concomitant lateral meniscal tears. The secondary meniscectomy rate was 10.8% at a mean follow-up of 45.6 months (range, 24.2-66.2 months). Patients who underwent ACLR + anterolateral ligament reconstruction had a >2-fold reduction in the risk of reoperation for failure of ramp repair as compared with patients who underwent isolated ACLR (hazard ratio, 0.457; 95% CI, 0.226-0.864; P = .021).

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing ACLR. The identification of important risk factors for ramp lesions should help raise an appropriate index of suspicion and prompt posteromedial compartment evaluation. The overall secondary partial meniscectomy rate after ramp repair is 10.8%. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction appears to confer a protective effect on the ramp repair performed at the time of ACLR and results in a significant reduction in secondary meniscectomy rates.

Arthroscopic repair of the meniscus: Surgical management and clinical outcomes

From the biomechanical and biological points of view, an arthroscopic meniscal repair (AMR) should always be considered as an option. However, AMR has a higher reoperation rate compared with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, so it should be carefully indicated.Compared with meniscectomy, AMR outcomes are better and the incidence of osteoarthritis is lower when it is well indicated.Factors influencing healing and satisfactory results must be carefully evaluated before indicating an AMR.Tears in the peripheral third are more likely to heal than those in the inner thirds.Vertical peripheral longitudinal tears are the best scenario in terms of success when facing an AMR.'Inside-out' techniques were considered as the gold standard for large repairs on mid-body and posterior parts of the meniscus. However, recent studies do not demonstrate differences regarding failure rate, functional outcomes and complications, when compared with the 'all-inside' techniques.Some biological therapies try to enhance meniscal repair success but their efficacy needs further research. These are: mechanical stimulation, supplemental bone marrow stimulation, platelet rich plasma, stem cell therapy, and scaffolds and membranes.Meniscal root tear/avulsion dramatically compromises meniscal stability, accelerating cartilage degeneration. Several options for reattachment have been proposed, but no differences between them have been established. However, repair of these lesions is actually the reference of the treatment.Meniscal ramp lesions consist of disruption of the peripheral attachment of the meniscus. In contrast, with meniscal root tears, the treatment of reference has not yet been well established. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:584-594. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170059.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Sequential Arthroscopic Approach for Ramp Lesions of the Posterior Horn of the Medial Meniscus in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knee

PURPOSE

To document the diagnostic accuracy and steps for sequential arthroscopic exploration of ramp lesions-peripheral tear within 4 mm of meniscocapsular junction of medial meniscus-associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

This was a prospective consecutive study of 195 primary ACL reconstructions with arthroscopic exploration for ramp lesion in 4 steps: (1) standard exploration through the anterolateral portal, (2) through the intercondylar space using a 30° arthroscope, (3) through the intercondylar space using a 70° arthroscope, and (4) after creation of a posteromedial portal. Acute (<3 months) and chronic case (>3 months) groups were compared, and the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 patients (26.6%) were confirmed as having a ramp lesion. After step 1, only 19 cases (38%) were identified as a ramp lesion. After step 2, 24 cases (48%) were found, and the sensitivity of step 2 was estimated at 48%. After step 3, an additional 26 cases (52%) were identified. No more additional cases of ramp lesion were found after step 4. There were statistically significant differences between steps 2 and 3 (P = .001), but no differences between steps 1 and 2, or steps 3 and 4. Although there were no statistical differences in overall prevalence for acute (28/128, 21.8%) and chronic (22/67, 32.8%) groups (P = .136), the incidence of ramp lesion confirmed through the standard portal approach was found to be significantly correlated with chronic group (odds ratio: 2.95, P = .023). The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative MRI were 84% and 95.17%.

CONCLUSIONS

Many ramp lesions could not be diagnosed through the standard portal and intercondylar space using a 30° arthroscope. Posteromedial inspection using a 70° arthroscope has improved the diagnostic accuracy for ramp lesion without direct exploration through the posteromedial portal. Care should be taken to identify ramp lesions when ACL reconstruction is performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, diagnostic study of consecutive patients.

International Olympic Committee Pediatric ACL Injury Consensus Group, Ardern CL, Ekås G, Grindem H, Moksnes H, Anderson AF, Chotel F, Cohen M, Forssblad M, Ganley TJ, Feller JA, Karlsson J, Kocher MS, LaPrade RF, McNamee M, Mandelbaum B, Micheli L, Mohtadi NG, Reider B, Roe JP, Seil R, Siebold R, Silvers-Granelli HJ, Soligard T, Witvrouw E, Engebretsen L. 2018 International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

In October 2017, the International Olympic Committee hosted an international expert group of physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons who specialize in treating and researching pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The purpose of this meeting was to provide a comprehensive, evidence-informed summary to support the clinician and help children with ACL injury and their parents/guardians make the best possible decisions. Representatives from the following societies attended: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society; European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, and Arthroscopy; International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine; Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America; and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Artroscopia, Rodilla, y Deporte. Physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons with clinical and research experience in the field and an ethics expert with substantial experience in the area of sports injuries also participated. This consensus statement addresses 6 fundamental clinical questions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and management of pediatric ACL injuries. Injury management is challenging in the current landscape of clinical uncertainty and limited scientific knowledge. Injury management decisions also occur against the backdrop of the complexity of shared decision making with children and the potential long-term ramifications of the injury.

2018 International Olympic Committee consensus statement on prevention, diagnosis and management of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries

In October 2017, the International Olympic Committee hosted an international expert group of physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons who specialise in treating and researching paediatric ACL injuries. Representatives from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society, European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery & Arthroscopy, International Society of Arthroscopy Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Artroscopia, Rodilla y Deporte attended. Physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons with clinical and research experience in the field, and an ethics expert with substantial experience in the area of sports injuries also participated. Injury management is challenging in the current landscape of clinical uncertainty and limited scientific knowledge. Injury management decisions also occur against the backdrop of the complexity of shared decision-making with children and the potential long-term ramifications of the injury. This consensus statement addresses six fundamental clinical questions regarding the prevention, diagnosis and management of paediatric ACL injuries. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a comprehensive, evidence-informed summary to support the clinician, and help children with ACL injury and their parents/guardians make the best possible decisions.

2018 International Olympic Committee consensus statement on prevention, diagnosis and management of paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries

In October 2017, the International Olympic Committee hosted an international expert group of physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons who specialise in treating and researching paediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Representatives from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society, European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy, International Society of Arthroscopy Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Artroscopia, Rodilla y Deporte attended. Physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons with clinical and research experience in the field, and an ethics expert with substantial experience in the area of sports injuries also participated. Injury management is challenging in the current landscape of clinical uncertainty and limited scientific knowledge. Injury management decisions also occur against the backdrop of the complexity of shared decision-making with children and the potential long-term ramifications of the injury. This consensus statement addresses six fundamental clinical questions regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and management of paediatric ACL injuries. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a comprehensive, evidence-informed summary to support the clinician, and help children with ACL injury and their parents/guardians make the best possible decisions.

High failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bimeniscal repair: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Bimeniscal lesions are common in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. However, bimeniscal repair is rarely performed during ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes after ACL reconstruction with bimeniscal repair.

HYPOTHESIS

Bimeniscal lesions, even when repaired, are associated with poorer outcomes of ACL reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective case-control design was used. The cases were 15 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, without procedures on any other ligaments, combined with bimeniscal repair, between May 2009 and May 2013 (3.2% of all ACL reconstructions during the study period). This group (2-Mc group) was matched on age, gender, body mass index, and time to surgery to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had no meniscal lesions (0-Mc group) and to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and repair of the medial meniscus (1-Mc group). After a mean follow-up of 3.6 years, clinical outcomes were assessed based on the KOOS, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and knee laxity based on TELOS and GNRB measurements. The primary outcome measure was the rate of ACL re-rupture. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcomes and rate of delayed meniscectomy.

RESULTS

The ACL re-rupture rate was significantly higher in the 2-Mc group than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled (20%, vs. 1.7%; P=0.02). The functional scores showed no significant differences across groups. Post-operative differential laxity was significantly greater in the 2-Mc group (3.3mm by TELOS, P=0.02; and 2.5mm by GNRB, P=0.03) than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled. Delayed meniscectomy was performed in none of the 2-Mc group patients and in 2 of the 1-Mc group patients.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction combined with bimeniscal repair is a rarely performed procedure. It is associated with a high ACL re-rupture rate and greater differential laxity. Meniscal outcomes of bimeniscal repair, in contrast, are good.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, matched case-control study.

Is It Necessary to Repair Stable Ramp Lesions of the Medial Meniscus During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

A special type of meniscal lesion involving the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus (PHMM), termed a "ramp lesion," is commonly associated with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, its treatment is still controversial. Recently, stable ramp lesions treated with abrasion and trephination alone have been shown to have good clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Stable ramp lesions treated with abrasion and trephination alone during ACL reconstruction will result in similar clinical outcomes compared with those treated with surgical repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled study was performed in 91 consecutive patients who had complete ACL injuries and concomitant stable ramp lesions of the medial meniscus. All patients were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups based on whether the stable ramp lesions were surgically repaired (study group; n = 50) or only abraded and trephined (control group; n = 41) during ACL reconstruction. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was blinded to the functional assessment findings of the patients. The Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and stability assessments (pivot-shift test, Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, and KT-1000 arthrometer differences of <3, 3-5, and >5 mm) were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the healing status of the ramp lesions.

RESULTS

All consecutive patients who were screened for eligibility from August 2008 to April 2012 were enrolled and observed clinically. There were 40 patients in the study group and 33 patients in the control group who were observed for at least 2 years. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the study group and the control group in terms of the mean Lysholm score (88.7 ± 4.8 vs 90.4 ± 5.8, respectively; P = .528), mean subjective IKDC score (83.6 ± 3.7 vs 82.2 ± 4.5, respectively; P = .594), pivot-shift test results ( P = .658), Lachman test results ( P = .525), KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (1.6 ± 1.2 vs 1.5 ± 1.1, respectively; P = .853), or KT-1000 arthrometer grading ( P = .738). Overall, for both groups (n = 73), 67 patients showed completely healed (38 study, 29 control), 3 showed partially healed (1 study, 2 control), and 3 showed nonhealed (1 study, 2 control) signals on follow-up MRI when evaluating the healing status of the ramp lesions. There was no significant difference regarding the healing status of the ramp lesions between the 2 groups ( P = .543).

CONCLUSION

This prospective randomized controlled trial showed that, in terms of subjective scores, knee stability, and meniscal healing status, concomitant stable ramp lesions of the medial meniscus treated with abrasion and trephination alone during ACL reconstruction resulted in similar clinical outcomes compared with those treated with surgical repair.

Conservative treatment of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Management of small and stable meniscal tears within the vascular zone at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of meniscal tear left in situ at the time of ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Using the IKDC, KT-1000 and the Tegner Activity Score (TAS), we retrospectively analysed 175 cases of ACL reconstruction with meniscal tears performed from 2006 to 2012. Patients with residual laxity on clinical assessment were identified and considered as a subgroup. Clinical outcome and failure rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

In 83 patients (47.4%), a meniscal tear was left in situ at the time of ACL reconstruction: 45 were medial and 38 were lateral. Patients were clinically reassessed with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall failure rate of conservative meniscal treatment in patients with objective residual laxity was 87.5%, and 6.7% in patients with a stable knee (P<0.001). Those with stable knees had higher postoperative IKDC subjective scores (P=0.0022) and TAS (P<0.0001). Patients without residual laxity had higher failure rate for the medial meniscus compared with lateral meniscus - 10.5% versus 2.7% (P=0.36)-and the red-red zone had lower revision rate compared with the red-white zone (P=0.0322).

CONCLUSIONS

The conservative treatment of small and stable peripheral tears of the medial and lateral menisci had low failure rate and no described complications. In our series residual laxity significantly increased the failure rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level IV, therapeutic case series.

Meniscal Ramp Lesions: Anatomy, Incidence, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Meniscal ramp lesions are more frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than previously recognized. Some authors suggest that this entity results from disruption of the meniscotibial ligaments of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, whereas others support the idea that it is created by a tear of the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have been reported to have a low sensitivity, and consequently, ramp lesions often go undiagnosed. Therefore, to rule out a ramp lesion, an arthroscopic evaluation with probing of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus should be performed. Several treatment options have been reported, including nonsurgical management, inside-out meniscal repair, or all-inside meniscal repair. In cases of isolated ramp lesions, a standard meniscal repair rehabilitation protocol should be followed. However, when a concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is performed, the rehabilitation should follow the designated ACLR postoperative protocol. The purpose of this article was to review the current literature regarding meniscal ramp lesions and summarize the pertinent anatomy, biomechanics, diagnostic strategies, recommended treatment options, and postoperative protocol.

A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

BACKGROUND

There has been a substantial increase in the amount of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

PURPOSE

To quantify the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on the ACL in the past decade and to provide an overall summary of this literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of all ACL-related systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between January 2004 and September 2014 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database. Narrative reviews and non-English articles were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 1031 articles were found, of which 240 met the inclusion criteria. Included articles were summarized and divided into 17 topics: anatomy, epidemiology, prevention, associated injuries, diagnosis, operative versus nonoperative management, graft choice, surgical technique, fixation methods, computer-assisted surgery, platelet-rich plasma, rehabilitation, return to play, outcomes assessment, arthritis, complications, and miscellaneous.

CONCLUSION

A summary of systematic reviews on the ACL can supply the surgeon with a single source for the most up-to-date synthesis of the literature.

The Fate of Meniscus Tears Left In Situ at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study From the MOON Cohort

BACKGROUND

The management of meniscus tears identified at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is highly variable and includes repair, meniscectomy, and nontreatment.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the reoperation rate for meniscus tears left untreated at the time of ACL reconstruction with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. The hypothesis was that small peripheral tears identified at the time of ACL reconstruction managed with "no treatment" would have successful clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients with meniscus tears left untreated at the time of primary ACL reconstruction were identified from a multicenter study group with a minimum 6-year follow-up. Patient, tear, and reoperation data were obtained for analysis. The need for reoperation was used as the primary endpoint, with analysis performed to determine patient and tear characteristics associated with reoperation.

RESULTS

There were 194 patients with 208 meniscus tears (71 medial, 137 lateral) left in situ without treatment with a complete follow-up for analysis. Of these, 97.8% of lateral and 94.4% of medial untreated tears required no reoperation. Sixteen tears (7.7%) left in situ without treatment underwent subsequent reoperation: 9 tears (4.3%) underwent reoperation in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction, and 7 tears (3.4%) underwent reoperation for an isolated meniscus injury. The patient age was significantly lower in patients requiring reoperation, while tears measuring ≥10 mm more frequently required reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Lateral and medial meniscus tears left in situ at the time of ACL reconstruction did not require reoperation at a minimum 6-year follow-up for 97.8% and 94.4% of tears, respectively. These findings re-emphasize the low reoperation rate after the nontreatment of small, peripheral lateral meniscus tears while noting less predictable results for medial meniscus tears left without treatment.

Associated tears of the lateral meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors for different tear patterns

Background

The pattern of lateral meniscus tears observed in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured subjects varies greatly and determines subsequent management. Certain tear patterns with major biomechanical consequences should be repaired in a timely manner. Knowledge about risk factors for such tears may help to identify patients in the early posttraumatic phase and subsequently may improve clinical results.

Methods

A database of 268 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction was used to identify all patients with isolated ACL tears and patients with an associated tear of the lateral meniscus. Patients who underwent surgery >6 months after the injury were excluded. Based on the arthroscopic appearance of the lateral meniscus, patients were assorted to one of three groups: ‘no tear,’ ‘minor tear,’ and ‘major tear.’ Tear patterns defined as major included root tears, complete radial tears, and unstable longitudinal tears including bucket-handle tears. Univariate analysis was performed by comparing the three groups with regard to gender, age, height, weight, BMI, type of injury (high-impact sport, low-impact sport, and not sports related), and mechanism of injury (non-contact vs. contact). Multivariate logistic regression was carried out to identify independent risk factors for minor and major meniscal tears and to calculate odds ratios (OR).

Results

Two hundred fifteen patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 56% had isolated ACL tears, 27% had associated minor tears, and 17% had associated major tears of the lateral meniscus. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the three groups for gender (p = 0.002), age groups (p = 0.026), and mechanism of injury (p < 0.001). A contact injury mechanism was a risk factor for minor tears (OR: 4.28) and major tears (OR: 18.49). Additional risk factors for major tears were male gender (OR: 7.38) and age <30 years (OR: 5.85).

Conclusion

Male patients, patients <30 years, and particularly patients who sustained a contact injury have a high risk for an associated major lateral meniscus tear. Special attention is therefore necessary in those patients and early referral to magnetic resonance imaging and/or arthroscopy is recommended to allow meniscus repair in a timely manner.

Postoperative change in the length and extrusion of the medial meniscus after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The medial meniscus is a secondary stabilizer of anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. ACL reconstruction effectively restores an increased anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee. However, knee osteoarthritis sometimes develops in ACL-reconstructed patients during a long-term follow-up period. We hypothesized that the medial meniscal position would be different between the ACL-deficient and reconstructed knees. The aim of this study was to investigate pre-operative and postoperative location of the medial meniscus in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

ACL-reconstructed knees (28 knees) and normal knees (27 knees) were investigated. Medial tibial plateau length (MTPL) and medial tibial plateau width (MTPW) were determined using radiographic images. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based medial meniscal length (MML), medial meniscal width (MMW), and medial meniscal extrusion (MME) were measured. Postoperative change in the MML, MMW, and MME were evaluated and compared with those in normal knees.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the ACL-deficient (pre-operative) and normal groups were noted. The ACL-reconstructed (postoperative) group showed an increase in the MML, in the percentage of the MML (%MML = 100 MML/MTPL), and in the MME. Significant differences between postoperative and normal groups were observed in the MML, %MML, and MME. MMW and MMW percentage (100 MMW/MTPW) were similar in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The anteroposterior length and radial extrusion of the medial meniscus increased after ACL reconstruction. Transposition of the medial meniscus may be a possible cause of developing further degenerative knee joint disorders after ACL reconstruction.

Successful conservative treatment of patients with MRI-verified meniscal lesions

PURPOSE

To follow a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with MRI-verified meniscal lesions to identify pre-treatment prognostic factors for long-term results following arthroscopic or conservative treatment.

METHODS

In the course of 1 year, 291 patients with knee pain and clinically suspected of meniscal lesion were referred to the regional orthopaedic division and subjected to MRI and clinical examination by an experienced surgeon. Patients with MRI-verified meniscal lesions were treated according to an arthroscopy restrictive strategy meaning that treatment was initiated by conservative treatment. Arthroscopy was only performed if satisfying pain relief was not obtained. The Lysholm score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were obtained at baseline and after 12-24 months. A multiple linear regression model was used to investigate which pre-treatment prognostic factors were associated with improvement in the KOOS subscale pain from baseline to follow-up.

RESULTS

An MRI-verified meniscal lesion was found in 185 patients (64%). Among these, 58% were treated successfully by conservative treatment. A high KOOS subscale pain score at baseline was associated with less improvement from baseline to follow-up. Bucket-handle lesions were associated with larger improvement from baseline to follow-up compared to flap-tear lesions.

CONCLUSION

MRI findings and clinical status measured by KOOS subscale pain are prognostic for improvement among patients treated for MRI-verified meniscal lesions. Good results were observed for both operative and conservative treatment. The success rate for conservative treatment was 58%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Short-term effects of partial meniscectomy on the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aims to analyse the short-term effects of partial meniscectomy on the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes of 19 patients who had partial medial meniscectomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during the same surgery (Group 1) were compared with the outcomes of 25 patients who had also reconstruction but did not have any meniscal lesion (Group 2). Median follow-up time was 29 months (range 12-67 months) in Group 1 and 27 months (range 12-70 months) in Group 2. Feeling of apprehension in sports activities, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, KT-2000 Arthrometer(®) measurements and post-operative time to return to sports activity were the criteria for data analysis.

RESULTS

Eight patients (42%) in Group 1 and 5 patients (20%) in Group 2 stated feeling of apprehension in sports activities. IKDC score improved to A in 11 patients (58%) from Group 1, and 18 patients (72%) from Group 2. Mean anterior translation according to KT-2000 arthrometer measurements was 5.2 ± 1.3 mm in Group 1, and 4.6 ± 1.3 mm in Group 2. Post-operative time to return to sports activity was 8.5 ± 3.0 months in Group 1, and 6.5 ± 2.2 months in Group 2.

CONCLUSION

Partial meniscectomy for irreparable medial meniscal tears, applied during the same surgery with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, negatively affects the clinical outcomes in the short-term follow-up. This study may be a reference for long-term clinical trials and also future investigations of new methods in the treatment of similar cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the diagnosis of meniscus tears

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic imaging represents the fastest growing segment of costs in the US health system. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of alternative diagnostic approaches to meniscus tears of the knee, a highly prevalent disease that traditionally relies on MRI as part of the diagnostic strategy.

PURPOSE

To identify the most efficient strategy for the diagnosis of meniscus tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A simple-decision model run as a cost-utility analysis was constructed to assess the value added by MRI in various combinations with patient history and physical examination (H&P). The model examined traumatic and degenerative tears in 2 distinct settings: primary care and orthopaedic sports medicine clinic. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

In both practice settings, H&P alone was widely preferred for degenerative meniscus tears. Performing MRI to confirm a positive H&P was preferred for traumatic tears in both practice settings, with a willingness to pay of less than US$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Performing an MRI for all patients was not preferred in any reasonable clinical scenario. The prevalence of a meniscus tear in a clinician's patient population was influential. For traumatic tears, MRI to confirm a positive H&P was preferred when prevalence was less than 46.7%, with H&P preferred above that. For degenerative tears, H&P was preferred until the prevalence reaches 74.2%, and then MRI to confirm a negative was the preferred strategy. In both settings, MRI to confirm positive physical examination led to more than a 10-fold lower rate of unnecessary surgeries than did any other strategy, while MRI to confirm negative physical examination led to a 2.08 and 2.26 higher rate than H&P alone in primary care and orthopaedic clinics, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For all practitioners, H&P is the preferred strategy for the suspected degenerative meniscus tear. An MRI to confirm a positive H&P is preferred for traumatic tears for all practitioners. Consideration should be given to implementing alternative diagnostic strategies as well as enhancing provider education in physical examination skills to improve the reliability of H&P as a diagnostic test.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Alternative diagnostic strategies that do not include the use of MRI may result in decreased health care costs without harm to the patient and could possibly reduce unnecessary procedures.

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is superior to physical rehabilitation in the management of symptomatic unstable meniscal tears

PURPOSE

Meniscus injuries are the most commonly reported in athletes. Meniscectomy is the most common treatment. Stable peripheral tears may heal, while degenerative tears do well with physical therapy. However, the exact role of physical therapy in treating symptomatic unstable meniscal tears is not known. We aimed to identify the role of physical therapy in treating such patients and clarify the role of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in treating unstable meniscal tears.

METHODS

Seventy patients with unstable meniscal tear met the inclusion criteria according to Vande Berg and co-workers. Clinical examination, McMurray test and magnetic resonance imaging were done. Age ranged from 18-67 years (average 39.87). Mild osteoarthritis was seen in 20 cases. Physical therapy thrice a week for eight weeks was offered (faradic quadriceps stimulation and neuromuscular strengthening exercises). After physical therapy, patients still complaining or unsatisfied were offered arthroscopic partial menisectomy (APM). Outcomes were evaluated using the VAS pain score and the Lysholm knee score.

RESULTS

Mean VAS before interventions was 7.4, significantly improved to 5.16 after rehabilitation and to 1.9 after APM (p = 0.001). Mean Lysholm score before rehabilitation was 65.1 and improved to 69.6 after rehabilitation, the difference was non-significant. However, Lysholm score difference before and after APM showed a highly significant difference (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and swelling improved after physical therapy. However, patients were not satisfied as limited range of knee motion persisted. APM was superior to physical therapy in treating symptomatic unstable meniscal tears, with high patient satisfaction and restored knee function.