Meniscal and articular cartilage lesions in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee: correlation between time from injury and knee scores

A higher incidence of chondral injuries on the medial femoral condyle in concomitant ACL ruptures, no significant difference in treatment: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The associated damage to articular cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patients is a well-recognized phenomenon; however, there is a relative paucity in the literature regarding the different treatment techniques and outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify patients treated for acute ACL rupture and associated cartilage injury, with interest in the surgical management of these chondral injuries and any difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differing techniques.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed looking for treatment or management of International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3 or 4 articular cartilage injury at the time of ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies fit the criteria, a total of 892 patients were included, 64.6% were male with a mean age of 33.7 and the average time to follow-up was 41.7 months. 68.2% of the lesions were on the medial femoral condyle (MFC) with a mean lesion size of 3.9 cm2. Six different operative methods of dealing with chondral lesions were identified, there was no significant difference in PROMs between the techniques, although there was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic review found that chondral defects on the MFC are more common in concomitant ACL injuries, despite the pattern of bone bruising being more common on the lateral femoral condyle as reported in the literature. It also found no significant difference in the PROMs between the six different techniques identified for the concomitant management of ACL reconstruction and chondral defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Medial meniscal and bony slopes are higher in knees with failed ACL reconstruction than in patients with successful ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare tibial soft tissue and bony slopes in patients with failed and non-failed ACL reconstructions (ACLR). We hypothesized that patients with failed ACLR have increased slopes compared to non-failed ACLR, and unexplained failures have higher slopes than failures with clear technical errors and failed synthetic ligaments.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2022, 130 patients with failed ACLR were retrospectively identified; 79 knees with adequate MRI scans were analyzed. These were compared to 57 non-failed ACLRs. MRI measurements included lateral and medial tibial bony slope (LBS, MBS) and lateral and medial meniscal slope (LMS, MMS). Subgroup analysis assessed for failures with technical errors and failed synthetic ligaments.

RESULTS

In all patients, the LMS and MMS reduced the bony slope towards the horizontal without reaching statistical significance. Failed ACLR had significantly higher MBS (7.1° ± 2.9 vs. 4.6° ± 2.5, p < 0.001) and MMS (5.6° ± 3.5 vs. 3.4° ± 2.8, p < 0.001). The area under the curve for MBS was 0.721 (CI: 0.628-0.813). The Youden optimal threshold value of MBS ≥ 5.1° (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 56.1 %) yielded an odd's ratio for failure of 5.1 (CI:2.3-11.6; p < 0.001). Revisions with technical errors had slopes that were not significantly different to non-failed ACLR. Revisions with synthetic grafts had MBS (7.3° ± 3.2 vs. 4.6° ± 2.5; p = 0.007) and MMS (6° ± 3.8 vs. 3.4° ± 2.8; p = 0.021) that were significantly higher to non-failed ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Medial bony and meniscal slopes are higher in patients with unexplained failed ACLRs and revisions with synthetic grafts, but ACLR with technical errors failed with slopes similar to non-failed ACLRs. Increased medial slope values are a risk factor for surgical failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and risk of meniscus injury: Exploring the safest delay interval

Purpose

The duration for which anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be delayed without resulting in a risk of subsequent meniscus injury has remained a debatable topic. The main purpose of this study was to determine the safest delay interval for a delayed ACLR.

Methods

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent ACLR between January 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into four groups based on the delay interval: <3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and >12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) at 1-year postoperatively.

Results

A total of 95 patients were included in this study. ACLR delay of 3-6 months was not associated with the risk of meniscus injury, while a delay of 6-12 months (odds ratio [OR] = 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-16.79; p = 0.031) and >12 months (OR = 10.68; 95% CI = 2.55-42.22; p = 0.001) was associated with a likelihood of developing meniscus injury. Meniscus injury risk increased by 12% for each month of ACLR delay (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04-1.22; p = 0.003). Regarding clinical outcomes at 1-year postoperatively, all groups exhibit the same clinical results.

Conclusion

ACLR can be safely delayed up to 6 months after the initial injury. However, a delay for >6 months must be avoided, as it was found to significantly increase the likelihood of developing a meniscus injury.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Repair of bucket handle meniscus tears improves patient outcomes versus partial meniscectomy at the time of ACL reconstruction

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine demographic and surgical factors that influence patient-reported knee function in patients who undergo anterior crucial ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with concurrent bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) procedures. We hypothesized that repair of BHMT in the setting of concomitant ACLR and shorter time from injury to surgery would lead to improved patient-reported outcomes.

Methods

Forty-one patients (mean age: 28.0 ± 9.8 years, 72% male) with BHMT at the time of ACLR completed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) via online survey at an average of 15.2 months postop. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics, including time from injury to surgery, were compared between repair (n = 22) and meniscectomy (n = 19) groups using one-way analysis of variances; distributions of sex, graft source, BHMT compartment and zone were compared between groups using χ 2 tests. The association between IKDC-SKF score, demographics and surgical characteristics was evaluated using multivariable linear regression. A priori alpha level was p < 0.05.

Results

Meniscal repair and meniscectomy groups differed based on graft source and BHMT zone but not IKDC-SKF score (p = 0.085). Patients undergoing ACLR with autograft (p = 0.003) and with red-red zone BHMT (p < 0.001) more often underwent meniscal repair. The regression model demonstrated longer time from injury to surgery (p = 0.049), red-red tear zone (p = 0.04) and meniscectomy (p = 0.008); these were predictive of poorer IKDC-SKF scores.

Conclusion

BHMT repair was more likely performed in ACL autograft and on red-red zone tears. Longer time from injury to surgery is an indicator of poorer IKDC-SKF score, as this may increase the risk of concomitant pathologies. White-white zone BHMTs are associated with better IKDC-SKF scores than red-red zone BHMTs, which may be due to the smaller volume of tissue removed during meniscectomy of white-white zone tears and the avoidance of iatrogenic complications of meniscal repair.

Level of Evidence

Level III, therapeutic study.

Reduced physiological extrusion of the medial meniscus in axial load-bearing condition in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

PURPOSE

In this study, ultrasonography was used to measure medial meniscus (MM) extrusion under weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing conditions in both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-intact knee groups. This study aimed to determine the possible differences between these groups with an eventual impact on meniscal tears in ACL-deficient knees.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients who underwent ACL reconstructive surgery between June 2022 and April 2023 were enroled. After applying exclusion criteria, 37 patients met the conditions for inclusion in the study and formed the ACL deficiency group (Group D). Of the 141 patients presenting to an outpatient clinic who agreed to have ultrasonography conducted on their nondiscomforting contralateral knee, 37 patients matched for age, sex, hip-knee-ankle angle and body mass index with Group D patients were selected for the ACL intact group (Group I). Ultrasonography was used to measure MM extrusion in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing conditions for all participants.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were included in the study (n = 37 per group). The supine position showed an MM extrusion of 1.2 ± 0.7 mm in Group I and 1.2 ± 0.7 mm in Group D (not significant). In the standing position, MM extrusion measured 2.0 ± 0.6 mm in Group I and 1.3 ± 0.8 mm in Group D. The difference in extrusion (Δextrusion) between the two positions was 0.8 ± 0.6 in Group I and 0.1 ± 0.2 in Group D, with statistical significance (p < 0.01). A consistent reduction in MM extrusion during weight-bearing was observed in patients with ACL deficiency, irrespective of the duration of ACL deficiency, age, sex and BMI.

CONCLUSION

ACL deficiency did not significantly impact MM extrusion during nonweight-bearing conditions; however, less MM extrusion was observed in response to axial loading conditions. These findings indicate altered MM biomechanics due to increased anterior-posterior meniscal motion and rotational instability after ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Effect of knee bracing on clinical outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomised controlled study

Objectives

While there is a consensus against bracing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the question of its potential benefits, especially in cases involving meniscus repair, as well as its routine use by the majority of clinicians, remains a topic of debate. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of bracing in relation to clinical scores after ACL reconstruction, regardless of meniscus surgery.

Methods

This randomised controlled study involved patients aged 15-55 years who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction surgery. All eligible patients were assigned into two groups: one group received an adjustable frame with a four-point fixation knee brace for a four-week period, while the other did not.A single experienced surgeon performed standard anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. All patients, irrespective of whether they underwent meniscus repair, followed the same rehabilitation protocol. Knee functional questionnaires, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and examinations, were collected preoperatively, at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively. The study employed an intention-to-treat analysis and multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear models to compare continuous outcomes between the groups, adjusting for the times of follow-up.

Results

A total of 84 patients (42 patients per group) comprised of 75 males (89 %) and average age of 30 ± 9.4 years old. Patient-reported function, physical examination findings, and surgical characteristics were comparable between the two groups. (P-value >0.05) Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in IKDC and Lysholm scores at the end of the two-year follow-up period. (P-value <0.0001) In multivariate analysis, bracing was significantly associated with lower Tegner activity scale than the non-brace group after adjustment for VAS and time (coefficient -0.49, 95 % confidence interval -0.87, -0.10, P-value = 0.013). None of the graft ruptures were reported, and there was no significant difference of return to sports between the groups at the end of the follow-up.

Conclusion

The study suggests that knee bracing after ACL reconstruction, regardless of any additional meniscus procedures, fails to enhance subjective or objective outcomes and could potentially have a negative impact on the Tegner activity scale, although the difference is not clinically significant. The routine use of a postoperative brace should be discontinued.

Level of evidence

Level I, Randomised controlled trial with no negative criteria.

Delayed Meniscus Repair Lowers the Functional Outcome of Primary ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to evaluate whether the time of intervention and the type of meniscus surgery (repair vs. partial meniscectomy) play a role in managing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions with concurrent meniscus pathologies.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study which differentiated between early and late ACL reconstructions with a cut-off at 3 months. Patients were re-evaluated after 2 years.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients received an operation between 2-12 weeks after the injury, and thirty patients received the surgery between 13-28 weeks after trauma. The strongest negative predictive factor of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form in a hierarchical regression model was older age (ß = -0.49 per year; 95% CI [-0.91; -0.07]; p = 0.022; partial R2 = 0.08)). The strongest positive predictive factor was a higher preoperative Tegner score (ß = 3.6; 95% CI [0.13; 7.1]; p = 0.042; partial R2 = 0.07) and an interaction between meniscus repair surgery and the time of intervention (ß = 27; 95% CI [1.6; 52]; p = 0.037; partial R2 = 0.07), revealing a clinical meaningful difference as to whether meniscus repairs were performed within 12 weeks after trauma or were delayed. There was no difference whether partial meniscectomy was performed early or delayed.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical timing plays a crucial role when surgeons opt for a meniscus repair rather than for a meniscectomy.

Short-term fear of movement improves less after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with concomitant meniscus repair

BACKGROUND

Psychological response is important in return-to-sport decisions for athletes recovering from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to compare psychological response after ACLR with a concomitant meniscus repair compared to isolated ACLR.

METHODS

Thirty-five individuals completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return-to-Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale before ACLR and 2, 4, and 6 months after ACLR. Participants were dichotomized based on presence of concomitant meniscus repair (Yes/No). Separate group X time repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for both scales.

RESULTS

Participants were 65.7% female, 19.1 ± 4.7 years old with BMI of 24.9 ± 4.4 kg/m2. Sixteen individuals had an isolated ACLR with 19 individuals having an ACLR with concomitant meniscus repair. For the TSK, there was a group × time interaction effect(p = 0.028), with improvement in TSK scores for the isolated ACLR group (ACLR:2 months = 24.8 ± 3.7; 4 months = 22.0 ± 5.7; 6 months: 19.9 ± 5.9; Meniscus Repair:2 months = 25.5 ± 4.7; 4 months = 24.1 ± 5.0; 6 months: 23.8 ± 4.7). Six months after ACLR, TSK scores were worse in the meniscus repair group(p = 0.036). For the ACL-RSI, there was no interaction(p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant meniscus repair with ACLR results in less post-operative improvement in kinesiophobia through 6 months after ACLR compared to isolated ACLR.

Greater rate of return to play and re-injury following all-inside meniscal repair compared to the inside-out technique: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Inside-out and all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repairs are widely performed. However, it remains unclear which method promotes greater clinical outcomes. This study compared inside-out versus all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), failures, return to play, and symptoms.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently performed the literature search by accessing the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus in February 2023. All clinical studies which investigated the outcomes of all-inside and/or inside-out meniscal repair were considered.

RESULTS

Data from 39 studies (1848 patients) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 36.8 (9 to 120) months. The mean age of the patients was 25.8 ± 7.9 years. 28% (521 of 1848 patients) were women. No difference was found in PROMs: Tegner Activity Scale (P = 0.4), Lysholm score (P = 0.2), and International Knee Document Committee score (P = 0.4) among patients undergoing meniscal repair with all inside or inside-out techniques. All-inside repairs showed a greater rate of re-injury (P = 0.009) but also a greater rate of return to play at the pre-injury level (P = 0.0001). No difference was found in failures (P = 0.7), chronic pain (P = 0.05), reoperation (P = 0.1) between the two techniques. No difference was found in the rate of return to play (P = 0.5) and to daily activities (P = 0.1) between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair may be of special interest in patients with a particular interest in a fast return to sport, while, for less demanding patients, the inside-out suture technique may be recommended. High-quality comparative trials are required to validate these results in a clinical setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review.

Current practice of concomitant surgeries in cartilage repair of the femorotibial compartment of the knee: baseline data of 4968 consecutive patients from the German cartilage registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of underlying comorbidities is a field of rising interest in cartilage repair surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the current practice of concomitant surgeries in cartilage repair of the knee especially in the medial or lateral femorotibial compartment. Type, frequency and distribution of additional surgeries for correction of malalignment, knee instability and meniscus deficiency should be evaluated.

METHODS

Baseline data of 4968 patients of the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) were analyzed regarding the distribution of concomitant surgeries in addition to regenerative cartilage treatment.

RESULTS

Beyond 4968 patients 2445 patients with cartilage defects in the femorotibial compartment of the knee could be identified. Of these patients 1230 (50.3%) received additional surgeries for correction of malalignment, instability and meniscus deficiency. Predominant procedures were leg axis corrections (31.3%), partial meniscectomy (20.9%) and ACL reconstruction (13.4%). The distribution of the concomitant surgeries varied between cartilage defects according to the different defect genesis. Patients with traumatic defects were younger (36y) and received predominantly ACL reconstructions (29.2%) (degenerative: 6.7%), whereas patients with degenerative defects were older (43y) and underwent predominantly leg axis corrections (38.0%; traumatic: 11.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the high frequency and distinct distribution of the concomitant surgeries in addition to regenerative cartilage treatment procedures. Understanding of the underlying cause of the cartilage defect and addressing the comorbidities as a whole joint therapy are of utmost importance for a successful regenerative cartilage treatment. These data provide a baseline for further follow up evaluations and long-term outcome analysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Bone Bruise Patterns Associated With Pediatric and Adult Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Different

Purpose

To describe differences in radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between adult and pediatric patients with known primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of surgical patients with a history of ACL tears treated at our institution over a 7-year period. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on age (≤15 years and ≥21 years). Patients' radiographs and MRI studies were used to compare features including fracture incidence, bone bruise pattern, associated ligamentous injuries, and meniscal injuries between the 2 groups. Proportions of associated findings were analyzed using the 2-proportion z test.

Results

Within our cohorts of 52 sex-matched pediatric and adult patients, we found that pediatric patients were more likely to have radiographic evidence of fracture (P = .001) and MRI evidence of lateral femoral condylar bone bruising (P = .012). Adult patients had higher rates of medial femoral condylar bruising (P = .016) and medial proximal tibial bruising (P = .005), as well as popliteal fibular ligament injuries (P = .037), identified on MRI.

Conclusions

In this study, we identified differences in bone bruise patterns between pediatric and adult patients with primary ACL tears. Pediatric patients were more likely to have radiographic evidence of fracture and MRI evidence of lateral femoral condylar bone bruising. Adult patients were more likely to show medial femoral condylar and medial proximal tibial bone bruising, as well as popliteal fibular ligament injuries.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Multi-vendor multi-site quantitative MRI analysis of cartilage degeneration 10 Years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MOON-MRI protocol and preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

To describe the protocol of a multi-vendor, multi-site quantitative MRI study for knee post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), and to present preliminary results of cartilage degeneration using MR T1ρ and T2 imaging 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

DESIGN

This study involves three sites and two MR platforms. The patients are from a nested cohort (termed as Onsite cohort) within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort 10 years after ACLR. Phantoms and controls were scanned for evaluating reproducibility. Cartilage was automatically segmented, and T1ρ and T2 were compared between operated, contralateral, and control knees.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight ACL-reconstructed patients and 20 healthy controls were included. In phantoms, the intra-site coefficients of variation (CVs) of repeated scans ranged 1.8-2.1% for T1ρ and 1.3-1.7% for T2. The inter-site CVs ranged 1.6-2.1% for T1ρ and 1.1-1.4% for T2. In human subjects, the intra-site scan/rescan CVs ranged 2.2-3.5% for T1ρ and 2.6-4.9% for T2 for the six major compartments. In patients, operated knees showed significantly higher T1ρ and T2 values mainly in medial femoral condyle, medial tibia and trochlear cartilage compared with contralateral knees, and showed significantly higer T1ρ and T2 values in all six compartments compared to healthy control knees. The patient contralateral knees showed higher T1ρ and T2 values mainly in the lateral femoral condyle, lateral tibia, trochlear, and patellar cartilage compared to healthy control knees.

CONCLUSION

A platform and workflow with rigorous quality control has been established for a multi-vendor multi-site quantitative MRI study in evaluating PTOA 10 years after ACLR. Our preliminary report suggests significant cartilage matrix changes in both operated and contralateral knees compared with healthy control knees.

Relationship Between Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Chondral Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, the optimal timing of ACL reconstruction and the influence of this timing on chondral damage remain unclear.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of timing of ACL reconstruction on the presence of chondral injuries via a systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently performed systematic literature searches of 5 online databases using the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria were any comparative study of patients aged >16 years that assessed the relationship between timing of primary ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of chondral injuries. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

After screening, 14 studies (n = 3559 patients) out of 2363 titles met the inclusion criteria: 3 randomized controlled trials (n = 272), 3 prospective cohort studies (n = 398), and 8 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2889). In analysis of the studies, chondral injury rates were compared between ACL reconstructions performed before and after 3 time points: 3, 6, and 12 months after injury (eg, ≤3 vs >3 months). The rates of chondral injury increased with each time point. The increase was mostly due to low-grade injuries at 3 months (estimated odds ratio, 1.914; 95% CI, 1.242-2.949; P = .003), with the increase in high-grade injuries becoming predominant after 12 months (estimated odds ratio, 3.057; 95% CI, 1.460-6.40; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that delaying ACL reconstruction surgery results in a higher rate of chondral injuries and the severity of these lesions worsens with time. These findings are comparable with those of our previously published study, which demonstrated a higher risk of meniscal tears associated with delayed ACL surgery. When ACL reconstruction is indicated, surgery ≤3 months after injury is associated with a lower risk of intra-articular damage.

REGISTRATION

CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).

Acute and subacute anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are associated with a higher risk of revision and reoperation

PURPOSE

(1) Report concomitant cartilage and meniscal injury at the time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), (2) evaluate the risk of aseptic revision ACLR during follow-up, and (3) evaluate the risk of aseptic ipsilateral reoperation during follow-up.

METHODS

Using a United States integrated healthcare system's ACLR registry, patients who underwent primary isolated ACLR were identified (2010-2018). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision, with a secondary outcome evaluating ipsilateral aseptic reoperation. Outcomes were evaluated by time from injury to ACLR: acute (< 3 weeks), subacute (3 weeks-3 months), delayed (3-9 months), and chronic (≥ 9 months).

RESULTS

The final sample included 270 acute (< 3 weeks), 5971 subacute (3 weeks-3 months), 5959 delayed (3-9 months), and 3595 chronic (≥ 9 months) ACLR. Medial meniscus [55.4% (1990/3595 chronic) vs 38.9% (105/270 acute)] and chondral injuries [40.0% (1437/3595 chronic) vs 24.8% (67/270 acute)] at the time of ACLR were more common in the chronic versus acute groups. The crude 6-year revision rate was 12.9% for acute ACLR, 7.0% for subacute, 5.1% for delayed, and 4.4% for chronic ACLR; reoperation rates a 6-year follow-up was 15.0% for acute ACLR, 9.6% for subacute, 6.4% for delayed, and 8.1% for chronic ACLR. After adjustment for covariates, acute and subacute ACLR had higher risks for aseptic revision (acute HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.07-2.72, p = 0.026; subacute HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, p = 0.040) and aseptic reoperation (acute HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.43-2.91, p < 0.001; subacute HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11-1.54, p = 0.002) when compared to chronic ACLR.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort study, while more meniscal and chondral injuries were reported for ACLR performed ≥ 9 months after the date of injury, a lower risk of revision and reoperation was observed following chronic ACLR relative to patients undergoing surgery in acute or subacute fashions.

Management Strategies and Imaging Observation of Early and Delayed Intelligent Treatment of Meniscus Sports Injury under Knee Osteoarthroscopy

Objective

To investigate the meniscus characteristics of knee osteoarthritis and its guiding significance for minimally invasive surgery.

Methods

A total of 100 patients with knee meniscus sports injuries who were treated in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 were selected as the research subjects and were grouped according to the interval between injury and surgery, with an interval of 2 months: the early group (53 cases) within 2 months and the delayed group (47 cases) with an interval of more than 2 months. The distribution of intraoperative complications in the two groups was observed and recorded, and the changes in pain degree, joint range of motion, knee joint function, and quality of life scores before and after operation were compared between the two groups.

Results

The postoperative VAS score, range of motion, Lysholm score, IKDC knee subjective function score, and quality of life score were significantly improved in both groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of intra-articular cartilage injury in the delayed group was significantly higher than that in the early group (P < 0.05). The patellofemoral cartilage injury was the main part of intra-articular cartilage injury in the two groups, and the incidence of patellofemoral cartilage injury in the delayed group was significantly higher than that in the early group (P < 0.05). The cartilage damage was mainly cartilage damage, and the grades I-II and III-IV cartilage damages were significantly increased in the extension group.

Conclusion

Meniscal injury in knee osteoarthritis has certain microscopic characteristics. In this paper, the microscopic classification of meniscus injury in knee osteoarthritis is helpful to guide microscopic surgery and improve the minimally invasive knee osteoarthritis effect of surgical treatment.

Time from Injury Is the Key Predictor of Meniscal Injury in ACL-Deficient Knees

The meniscus is one of the most important structures of the knee that needs to be saved if possible. Previous studies showed that increasing time from an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury (TFI) could lead to a meniscal tear, especially medial meniscus (MM). We developed the present study to see if the TFI alone is a predictor of meniscal injury in ACL-deficient knees. We included 111 patients who had a reconstructed ACL injury at our institution from March 2015 to March 2016 in this retrospective cohort study. All demographic data, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), were collected. We also recorded the mechanism of injury and the TFI. We extracted the meniscal condition at the time of surgery from the surgical report. All patients were followed up for a mean of 23 months, and the Lysholm score and pain visual analog scale (VAS) score were obtained. The mean TFI of patients with MM tear was 17.4 ± 16.8 months, which was significant than the patients with lateral meniscal (LM) tear (9.3 ± 8.3 months) and intact meniscus (7.4 ± 8.1 months) (p = 0.001). Patients with TFI less than 6 months had a significantly lower rate of MM tear, and increasing TFI more than 6 months could increase the rate of MM tear (p = 0.001). We could not find any association between age, BMI, and gender and meniscal injury. At the latest follow-up, Lysholm and VAS scores in patients with and without meniscal tear were the same. Our study confirms that increasing time from the ACL injury would increase the risk of MM damage. The cutoff point for this risk factor is 6 months from initial injury; therefore, to save the meniscus, it might be better to perform ACL reconstruction within 6 months in ACL-deficient knees.

Medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears, while type I ACL tears only account for 8% of all ACL tears

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the distribution of different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear locations in different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) planes, and to explore the relationships of ACL tear types with both meniscus injuries and bone bruising.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in patients under 60 years old who underwent MRI scans in the sagittal and coronal oblique planes of the knee for ACL tears between 2014 and 2020. Patients with reports of chronic tears, partial tears, or prior surgeries were excluded. Tear locations were classified into five types, and the meniscus tear measurement variables included the presence of ramp, root, bucket-handle, and other types of tears. All injuries were confirmed by arthroscopy. Meanwhile, the presence and location of bone bruising were analysed and scored with the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) bone bruising subscale.

RESULTS

A total of 291 patients were included. The prevalence rates of type I and type III injuries were 23/291 (7.9%) and 145/291 (49.8%) in the sagittal plane and 22/291 (7.6%) and 179/291 (61.5%) in the oblique coronal plane, respectively. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears with ACL tears was 126/291 (43.3%), while that of lateral meniscus tears with ACL tears was 77/291 (26.5%). The highest prevalence of medial meniscus injury with ACL tears was 15/22 (68.2%) for type I injuries. Bone bruises were located on the lateral femoral center in 125 patients (46%) and on the lateral tibia posterior in 132 patients (48%); the common areas of bone bruising were slightly correlated with type III ACL tears but not correlated with type I ACL tears.

CONCLUSION

The plane in which an MRI scan is performed affects the classification of ACL tears. The tear type is associated with the prevalence of medial meniscus injuries, and medial meniscus tears are most prevalent in type I ACL tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Single-stage repair of displaced bucket-handle meniscal tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to good meniscal survivorship : a retrospective cohort study

AIMS

The best surgical strategy for the management of displaced bucket-handle (BH) meniscal tears in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee is unclear. Combining meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is thought to improve meniscal healing rates; however, patients with displaced BH meniscal tears may lack extension. This leads some to advocate staged surgery to avoid postoperative stiffness and loss of range of motion (ROM) following ACLR.

METHODS

We reviewed the data for a consecutive series of 88 patients (mean age 27.1 years (15 to 49); 65 male (74%) and 23 female (26%)) who underwent single-stage repair of a displaced BH meniscal tear (67 medial (76%) and 21 lateral (24%)) with concomitant hamstring autograft ACLR. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire (EQ-5D), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), and Tegner score were recorded at final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate meniscal repair survivorship. Analyses were performed with different cut-offs for meniscal and ACL injury-to-surgery time (within three weeks, three to ten weeks, and more than ten weeks).

RESULTS

Meniscal repair survivorship at a median final follow-up of 55 months (interquartile range (IQR) 24 to 91) was 82% (95% confidence interval 70 to 89). A total of 13 meniscus repairs failed (12 requiring meniscectomy and one requiring a further meniscal repair). At final follow-up, median PROMs were: EQ-VAS 85 (IQR 75 to 90), EQ-5D Index 0.84 (IQR 0.74 to 1.00), KOOS Pain 89 (IQR 80 to 94), KOOS Symptoms 82 (IQR 71 to 93), KOOS Activities of Daily Living 97 (IQR 91 to 100), KOOS Sport and Recreation 80 (IQR 65 to 90), KOOS Quality of Life 69 (IQR 53 to 86), IKDC 82.8 (IQR 67.8 to 90.8), and Tegner 6 (IQR 4 to 7). Two patients underwent revision ACLR following further injuries. One patient had an arthroscopic washout for infection at 11 days post-BH meniscal repair/ACLR. Four patients (4.5%) required a further procedure for stiffness, reduced ROM, and pain, and all were operated on within three weeks of meniscal injury. There was no difference in the interval between meniscal injury and surgery between repairs that failed and those that survived.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that concomitant ACLR with repair of displaced BH meniscal tears, even if they have been displaced for some time, appears to afford satisfactory PROMs and good survivorship. Repairs within three weeks of meniscal injury may be associated with higher rates of postoperative reintervention for stiffness. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):680-686.

Comparison of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Treated Nonoperatively Versus With Reconstruction: Risk of Subsequent Surgery

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears can be devastating injuries, leading to joint instability, meniscal tears, and subsequent arthritis. It is unknown whether ACL reconstruction (ACLR) alters the natural history of joint degeneration in the ACL-deficient knee compared with nonoperative treatment, and few studies have examined outcomes in middle-aged patients.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the midterm risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery in middle-aged patients after an ACL injury treated with initial conservative (nonoperative) management (CM) versus ACLR (operative management [OM]) within 6 months of the diagnosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We performed an electronic database search from 2011 to 2012 for all patients aged 35 to 55 years with an initial diagnosis of magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed ACL tear. Patients who elected CM and those who underwent ACLR within 6 months of the diagnosis (OM) were identified. Index patient and clinical characteristics were collected from the health record. All patients were longitudinally observed until August 31, 2017. The primary outcome was subsequent ipsilateral knee surgeries, and secondary outcomes included contralateral knee surgeries, deep surgical-site infections, and venous thrombotic events.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.8 ± 0.6 years. The CM group included 463 patients (40.2%) and the OM group included 690 patients (59.8%). The mean ages were 43.9 ± 5.7 years and 42.7 ± 5.3 years for patients in the CM and OM groups, respectively (P < .001). Obesity and smoking were significantly more common in the CM group. During the follow-up, 180 patients (38.9%) in the CM group underwent subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery compared with 73 (10.6%) patients in the OM group (P < .001). The mean time to the first ipsilateral procedure was 0.9 ± 1.1 years in the CM and 2 ± 1.5 years in the OM group (P < .001). Delayed ipsilateral ACLRs were performed in 81 patients in the CM group (17.5%); non-ACLR ipsilateral knee surgeries were performed in 156 patients in the CM group (33.7%). Contralateral knee surgery rates were similar. In a regression model, after controlling for age, sex, the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and smoking status, it was found that normal body mass index and CM group were risk factors for undergoing subsequent knee surgery or ipsilateral non-ACLR surgery.

CONCLUSION

Excluding delayed ACLR, subsequent ipsilateral knee surgeries were more common and occurred earlier in middle-aged patients with nonoperatively managed ACL tears compared with patients managed with reconstruction.

Cell-based treatment options facilitate regeneration of cartilage, ligaments and meniscus in demanding conditions of the knee by a whole joint approach

PURPOSE

This article provides an update on the current therapeutic options for cell-based regenerative treatment of the knee with a critical review of the present literature including a future perspective on the use of regenerative cell-based approaches. Special emphasis has been given on the requirement of a whole joint approach with treatment of comorbidities with aim of knee cartilage restoration, particularly in demanding conditions like early osteoarthritis.

METHODS

This narrative review evaluates recent clinical data and published research articles on cell-based regenerative treatment options for cartilage and other structures around the knee RESULTS: Cell-based regenerative therapies for cartilage repair have become standard practice for the treatment of focal, traumatic chondral defects of the knee. Specifically, matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT) shows satisfactory long-term results regarding radiological, histological and clinical outcome for treatment of large cartilage defects. Data show that regenerative treatment of the knee requires a whole joint approach by addressing all comorbidities including axis deviation, instability or meniscus pathologies. Further development of novel biomaterials and the discovery of alternative cell sources may facilitate the process of cell-based regenerative therapies for all knee structures becoming the gold standard in the future.

CONCLUSION

Overall, cell-based regenerative cartilage therapy of the knee has shown tremendous development over the last years and has become the standard of care for large and isolated chondral defects. It has shown success in the treatment of traumatic, osteochondral defects but also for degenerative cartilage lesions in the demanding condition of early OA. Future developments and alternative cell sources may help to facilitate cell-based regenerative treatment for all different structures around the knee by a whole joint approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors

PURPOSE

To determine factors that predict return to the same frequency and type of sports participation with similar activity demands as before injury.

METHODS

Individuals 1 to 5 years after primary ACL reconstruction completed a comprehensive survey related to sports participation and activity before injury and after surgery. Patient characteristics, injury variables, and surgical variables were extracted from the medical record. Return to preinjury sports (RTPS) was defined as: "Returning to the same or more demanding type of sports participation, at the same or greater frequency with the same or better Marx Activity Score as before injury." Variables were compared between individuals that achieved comprehensive RTPS and those that did not with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and fifty-one patients (mean age 26.1 years, SD 9.9) completed the survey at an average of 3.4 years (SD 1.3) after ACL reconstruction. The overall rate of RTPS was 48.6%. Patients were more likely to RTPS if they were younger than 19 years old (OR = 4.07; 95%CI 2.21-7.50; p < 0.01) or if they were competitive athletes (OR = 2.07; 95%CI 1.24-3.46; p = 0.01). Patients were less likely to RTPS if surgery occurred more than 3 months after injury (OR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17-0.58; p < 0.01), if there was a concomitant cartilage lesion (OR = 0.38; 95%CI 0.21-0.70; p < 0.01), and if cartilage surgery was performed (OR = 0.17; 95%CI 0.04-0.80; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Five variables best predicted RTPS including age at time of surgery. Only time from injury to surgery is a potentially modifiable factor to improve RTPS; however, the reasons for which patients delayed surgery may also contribute to them not returning to sports. Regardless, younger patients, those that partake in sports on a competitive level, those that undergo surgery sooner, or do not have a cartilage injury or require cartilage surgery are more likely to return to pre-injury sports participation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical outcomes, failure rates and subsequent processing

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and explore the causes of failure of meniscus repair.

METHODS

From May 2013 to July 2018, the clinical data of 165 patients who were treated with meniscus surgery and simultaneous ACL reconstruction, including 69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ACL rupture associated with fracture, collateral ligament injury, or complex ligament injury; (2) a history of knee surgery; or (3) a significant degree of osteoarthritis. The 69 patients in the repair group were divided into the non-failure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect. Postoperative outcomes of the repair group and the partial meniscectomy group were compared. General conditions and postoperative outcomes of the failure group and the non-failure group were compared. During the median follow-up period of 28 months (range, 4 - 65 months) after the second arthroscopy, postoperative outcomes of seven patients in the failure group were summarized. SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seven patients in the failure group who underwent the second arthroscopy were followed up for (30 ± 17.4) months and their postoperative outcomes were summarized. Compared with the partial meniscectomy group, the International Knee Documentation Committee scores of patients in the repair group improved significantly (p = 0.031). Compared with the non-failure group, more patients in the failure group were younger than 24 years (p = 0.030). The median follow-up period was 39.5 months. All patients recovered well after subsequent partial meniscectomy and relieved clinical symptoms. Visual analog scale scores decreased significantly (p = 0.026), and the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores improved significantly (p = 0.046 for both).

CONCLUSION

The failure rate of meniscus repair in this study was 10.1% (7/69), all of which were medial meniscus tears. However, the surgical outcomes of ACL reconstruction were not affected, and there might be a role for graft protection. Therefore, meniscus retears can be successful treated by performing subsequent partial meniscectomy in patients with repair failure.

The relationship between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears

BACKGROUND

Segond fracture may be identified when an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is diagnosed, and it has historically been considered a sign of significant knee trauma indicating intra-articular injury. There are few studies on the correlation between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury in patients with ACL tears.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing acute ACL reconstruction (less than 1 month from the time of injury) between 2013 and 2020 was performed. The absence or presence of a Segond fracture was confirmed using preoperative radiographs. Demographic data (age, sex and body mass index), injury variables (time from injury and mechanism of injury) and arthroscopic features (meniscal or chondral injury) were analysed to investigate the relationship between a Segond fracture and meniscus injury.

RESULTS

A total of 427 patients were included in the study. The incidence of Segond fractures was 12.4%. Among the patients with a Segond fracture, 15 patients were injured playing soccer (28.3%), 11 patients were injured playing basketball (20.8%), eight patients sustained the injury during racquet sports (15.1%), five patients (9.4%) were injured during less popular sports (such as skiing, ice-skating and boxing), and 14 patients (26.4%) were injured by contact mode of injury. A Segond fracture was a significant risk factor for lateral meniscus tears in patients with ACL tears (adjusted odds ratio, 1.938; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-3.481; P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of Segond fractures in patients with acute ACL tears was higher than that reported in previous studies. A Segond fracture could increase the risk of a lateral meniscus tear in patients with an ACL tear.

Strong association of meniscus tears with complete Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries relative to partial ACL injuries

BACKGROUND

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries are often associated with meniscus tears. These meniscus tears in long term may affect the functional outcomes after ACL reconstruction. The present study aims to identify the incidence and relative association of meniscus injuries in complete and partial ACL injuries.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group I: partial ACL tear and group 2: complete ACL tear. Both groups were assessed for meniscal tears; either isolated medial/lateral or combined and odds ratio was measured between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 43 and 219 patients were enrolled in group I and II respectively. The mean age (years) in group I and II were 25.32 ± 7.12 and 28.64 ± 10.84 respectively. There were a total of 5 and 28 females in group I and II respectively. Mean pre-injury Tegner score in group I and II was 7.02 ± 2.87 and 6.82 ± 3.14 respectively. Mean time from injury to surgery (months) in group I and II was 8.04 ± 6.43 and 7.62 ± 4.83 respectively. In group 1 There were a total of 6 with lateral meniscus tears, 9 with medial meniscus tears And 3 with combined meniscal tears in group 1 while in group 2, 47 had lateral meniscal tears, 71 had medial meniscal tears and 71 had combined tears. Group II patients had stronger association for isolated meniscal tears compared to group I, with an odds ratio of 5.05(p < 0.05). Combined meniscal tears had non-significant relation in two groups (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

Partial ACL injuries present with less risk of acquiring isolated meniscus tears, compared to complete ACL injuries.

Postsurgical status of articular cartilage after arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with or without concomitant meniscal pathology

PURPOSE

Several factors present at the time of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) may cause the subsequent progression of articular cartilage lesions. This study aimed to evaluate postsurgical articular cartilage lesions which can be seen on MRI in patients who underwent arthroscopic PCLR with or without concomitant meniscal pathology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of sixty-five patients (mean age 35.8 ± 12.3 years) who underwent arthroscopic PCLR were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: ten patients with concomitant meniscal injuries at the time of PCLR who underwent meniscal surgery and fifty-five patients with intact menisci. The cartilage status of all knees was evaluated by MRI and modified Noyes classification.

RESULTS

Cartilage lesions were observed in 18 patients (27.7%) on the last follow-up MRI. The cartilage lesions were more common in the medial (15.4%) and patellofemoral (12.3%) compartments than in the lateral compartment (7.7%). Progression of cartilage lesions was present in 11 patients (16.9%) during follow-up MRI. The majority of cartilage lesions with progression were located in the medial compartment. The meniscal pathology group showed a higher prevalence of articular cartilage lesions on the last follow-up MRI (21.8% versus 60%, p = 0.022). In multivariate Cox regression, concomitant meniscal pathology was significantly associated with progression of articular cartilage lesions (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

PCLR patients with associated meniscal pathology showed worse cartilage condition and more progression of cartilage lesions than isolated PCLR patients. Attention to this risk factor might provide more applicable treatment options for potential osteoarthritis prevention strategies.

Timing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Relationship With Meniscal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, but the ideal timing for ACL reconstruction after injury is unclear with regard to meniscal insult.

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is a relationship between timing from ACL rupture to ACL reconstruction and development of meniscal tears within this period.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was undertaken independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane method for systematic reviews in 5 online databases. The reviewers performed independent data extraction and assessment of risk of bias and study quality. The search included any comparative study, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies of an adult population, that assessed the relationship between timing of ACL reconstruction surgery and rates of meniscal tears.

RESULTS

After screening, 12 studies (No. of participants = 3042) out of 3390 records were included for analysis: 3 RCTs (n = 272), 2 prospective cohort studies (n = 307), and 7 retrospective cohort studies (n = 2463). In analysis of these studies, rates of reported meniscal tears were compared for ACL procedures performed at 3 and 6 months after injury. Meta-analysis of 5 studies (n = 2012) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >3 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 3 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.235; 95% CI, 1.183-4.223; P = .013) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears. Similarly, meta-analysis of 4 studies (n = 990) showed that ACL reconstruction performed >6 months after injury was associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears compared with ACL reconstruction performed within 6 months of injury (estimated OR, 2.487; 95% CI, 1.241-4.984; P = .01) but not with a higher rate of lateral meniscal tears.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that delay of ACL reconstruction surgery >3 months after injury is associated with a higher rate of medial meniscal tears within this prereconstruction time frame. Further high-quality prospective studies may help determine whether this is a causal effect. However, based on current evidence, in those patients for whom ACL reconstruction is indicated, ACL reconstruction within 3 months of injury may be recommended.

REGISTRATION

CRD42016032846 (PROSPERO).

A Novel Application of Unsupervised Machine Learning and Supervised Machine Learning-Derived Radiomics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Purpose

We aim to present an unsupervised machine learning application in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and evaluate whether supervised machine learning-derived radiomics features enable prediction of ACL rupture accurately.

Patients and Methods

Sixty-eight patients were reviewed. Their demographic features were recorded, radiomics features were extracted, and the input dataset was defined as a collection of demographic features and radiomics features. The input dataset was automatically classified by the unsupervised machine learning algorithm. Then, we used a supervised machine learning algorithm to construct a radiomics model. The t-test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method were used for feature selection, random forest and support vector machine (SVM) were used as machine learning classifiers. For each model, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to evaluate model performance.

Results

In total, 5 demographic features were recorded and 106 radiomics features were extracted. By applying the unsupervised machine learning algorithm, patients were divided into 5 groups. Group 5 had the highest incidence of ACL rupture and left knee involvement. There were significant differences in left knee involvement among the groups. Forty-three radiomics features were extracted using t-test and 7 radiomics features were extracted using LASSO method. We found that the combination of LASSO selection method and random forest classifier has the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC. The 7 radiomics features extracted by LASSO method were potential predictors for ACL rupture.

Conclusion

We validated the clinical application of unsupervised machine learning involving ACL rupture. Moreover, we found 7 radiomics features which were potential predictors for ACL rupture. The study indicated that radiomics could be a valuable method in the prediction of ACL rupture.

Rates of Concomitant Meniscal Tears in Pediatric Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries Increase With Age and Body Mass Index

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequently associated with meniscal injury. Risk factors for concomitant meniscal injuries have been studied in the adult population but less so in pediatric patients.

Purpose

To evaluate the relationship between age and body mass index (BMI) and the presence of a concomitant meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric patients.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective review was performed of patients aged <19 years who underwent primary ACLR over a 3.5-year period. Revision ACLR and multiligament knee reconstructions were excluded. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with having a meniscal tear at the time of surgery. Subgroup analysis was performed for medial and lateral meniscal tears.

Results

Included in this study were 453 patients (230 males, 223 females; median age, 15 years). Of these, 265 patients (58%) had a meniscal tear, including 150 isolated lateral meniscal tears, 53 isolated medial meniscal tears, and 62 patients with both lateral and medial meniscal tears. Median time from injury to surgery was 48 days. For every 1-year increase in age, there was a 16% increase in the adjusted odds of having any meniscal tear (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.27; P = .002), with a 20% increase in the odds of having a medial meniscal tear (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P = .002) and a 16% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27; P = .003). For every 2-point increase in BMI, there was a 12% increase in the odds of having any meniscal tear (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P = .016) and a 10% increase in the odds of having a lateral meniscal tear (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .028).

Conclusion

Pediatric patients undergoing ACLR had a 58% incidence of concomitant meniscal pathology. Increasing age and BMI were independent risk factors for these injuries, while no association was found between time to surgery and meniscal pathology.

The relationship between ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair: quality of life, sports return, and meniscal failure rate-2- to 12-year follow-up

Background

Few studies have approached in a long-term follow-up of meniscal repair at an amateur level, specially studying variables as a quality of life and failure rate. The purpose of this review is to study medium to long-term clinical results in patients at amateur sports patients, that have required meniscal sutures at our center, with or without ACL reconstruction. We evaluate the objective function of the knee, as well as patients’ return to sports activities, quality of life, and the rate of failed repair and study of the possible reasons.

Methods

This was an observational retrospective study. Ninety-two patients who regularly perform amateur sports activities (Tegner 4 to 7) were assessed, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, divided into 2 groups: group 1, isolated meniscal suture (43 cases) and group 2, associated to ACL reconstruction (49 cases). Each patient made this test in 2019: Lysholm and Tegner (validated for Spanish) before a knee injury and after surgery, motivation to return to sports activity (Likert scale with 3 items: low, regular, or high), and quality of life through SD-12 test.

Results

High return to amateur sports rate (92%) was even higher in the isolated meniscal repair group in comparison to the group with associated ACL. We have not found statistically significant differences between sports return and age, gender, injured meniscus, chondral injuries, preoperative Tegner score, or motivation. No significant differences in physical or mental health fields between both groups. Meniscal repair failed in 12 patients (13%). Higher rate of failure in isolated bucket-handle tear injuries (p < 0.0062). No statistically significant association was found between the other variables studied.

Conclusions

Good results with 92% of sports return, low rate of complications, and low retear rate, even lower when is associated with ACL reconstruction and in external meniscus repair, and high values at SF-12 between 2 groups.

Intra-articular and meniscal pathology according to anterior cruciate ligament injury pattern: both-bundle tear or selective bundle tear

Background

Articular cartilage injury and meniscal tear are usually combined with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Purpose

We investigated the incidence of cartilage injury and traumatic meniscal tear according to the type of combined anterior cruciate ligament tear (both-bundle versus selective bundle tear).

Material and Methods

This retrospective study included 103 patients diagnosed with anterior cruciate ligament tear after knee joint magnetic resonance imaging and who underwent knee joint arthroscopy. Two radiologists evaluated articular cartilage injuries and meniscal tear independently. We used the chi-square test to analyze the association between type of anterior cruciate ligament bundle tear and presence of cartilage or meniscal injury in each reader.

Results

Cartilage injury presented a significantly higher prevalence in both-bundle tear than did selective bundle tear in reader 1 ( P = 0.004). In reader 2, both-bundle tear had a tendency for higher risk of cartilage injury, but this was not statistically significant ( P = 0.178). In meniscal injury, there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of associated meniscal injury in both-bundle tear versus selective bundle anterior cruciate ligament injury ( P = 0.019 and 0.021). The risk of accompanying traumatic meniscal lesion was significantly higher in both-bundle tear ( P = 0.036 and 0.018).

Conclusion

The incidence of accompanying meniscal injury, especially traumatic tears, is higher in both-bundle anterior cruciate ligament tear than in selective bundle tear. There was no significant difference in incidence of cartilage injury between both-bundle tear and selective bundle tear, although one of two readers showed a higher incidence in both-bundle tear.

Anterior cruciate ligament tear due to non-contact mode of injury associated with higher incidence of meniscal and chondral damage

BACKGROUND

Forces acting on the knee are different in contact and non-contact mode of injuries causing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. Purpose of this study was to determine the effect of mode of injury on the occurrence of meniscal tear and chondral damage in ACL tear.

METHOD

72 athletes with acute ACL injury (<3 months) were enrolled in the study. Depending on the mode of injury, athletes were divided into two groups - group A (non-contact mode of injury) and group B (contact mode of injury). 49/72 athletes had the non-contact mode of injury (group A), and 23/72 athletes had contact mode of injury (group B). Meniscal tear and chondral damage seen at the time of ACL reconstruction surgery was noted. All athletes were assessed at 12 months follow-up for return to sports, Lysholm score, and WOMAC score.

RESULTS

In group A, 35/49 (71%) athletes and in group B, 9/23(39%) athletes had meniscal tear (p = 0.009). Medial meniscus was more commonly injured in group A [24/49] as compared to group B (5/23; p = 0.03). Chondral damage was also more commonly seen in group A [26/49] as compared to group B (5/23; p = 0.01). At one-year follow-up, 65% of the athletes from group B returned to sports as compared to 57% of the athletes from group A (p-value = 0.6). WOMAC score in group A and B was 95.5 ± 4.88 and 96 ± 4.39 respectively (p = 0.67). Lysholm score in group A and B was 1.02 ± 1.7 and 0.96 ± 1.2 respectively (p = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Non-contact mode of injury was associated with a higher incidence of meniscal tear and chondral damage. However, the mode of injury does not affect the functional outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 50 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

There is no consensus regarding the best treatment approach for middle-aged patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Chronic ACL-deficient knees are often associated with instability as well as secondary meniscal and cartilage lesions. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) has achieved satisfactory outcomes in younger patients; however, the effectiveness and safety of ACLR in middle-aged patients remain uncertain.

Purpose:

To compare the patient-reported functional scores, arthrometric outcomes, and complications of primary ACLR between older (≥50 years) and younger (<50 years) patients.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review of cohort studies that compared the clinical outcomes of ACLR between patients aged ≥50 years and those aged <50 years. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant studies. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria was used to assess the risk of bias and conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to combine the data, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the overall quality of the body of retrieved evidence. The primary outcome was knee functional outcomes, and secondary outcomes were arthrometric outcomes of ACLR and complications.

Results:

This study included 4 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 287 participants (129 in the older group and 158 in the younger group). All included studies reported significant improvements in clinical outcomes in both groups after ACLR. No significant differences were noted in the improvement of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (mean difference [MD], 0.20 [95% CI, −2.65 to 3.05]; P = .89) and Lysholm scores (MD, −1.98 [95% CI, −6.93 to 2.98]; P = .43) between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed in anteroposterior stability or risk of complications between the groups.

Conclusion:

ACLR may be performed in middle-aged patients (≥50 years) without concern for inferior clinical and arthrometric results compared with younger patients (<50 years).

Anterior tibial displacement on preoperative stress radiography of ACL-injured knee depending on knee flexion angle

Purpose

To compare side-to-side difference (SSD) of anterior tibial translation in instrumented stress radiography for each series of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured subjects according to knee flexion angle.

Methods

Forty subjects who were suspected of having significant ACL injury by manual Lachman test and MRI were recruited for this prospective study. These subjects took stress radiographs for both knees with corresponding knee flexion of 10° (series M1) and 30° (series M2) using Telos stress device. Mean SSDs of M1 and M2 were compared. Sensitivities of M1 and M2 were assessed using the SSD ≥ 3 mm or ≥ 5 mm as a cutoff value.

Results

Mean SSDs in series M1 and M2 were 4.22 ± 3.72 mm and 3.25 ± 3.30 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). When 3 mm of SSD was used as a cutoff value, sensitivities of series M1 and M2 were 47.5% (19/40) and 32.5% (13/40), respectively (p = 0.171). When 5 mm of SSD was used as a cutoff value, sensitivities of series M1 and M2 were 45.0% (18/40) and 22.5% (9/40), respectively (p = 0.033).

Conclusions

Anterior tibial translation on stress radiographs using a Telos device is more prominent when knee flexion angle is 10° compared to that when knee flexion angle is 30°. However, stress radiography using Telos device, either at 10° or 30° of knee flexion, might not be suitable to make decision on surgical treatment due to relatively low sensitivities.

The ACL-deficient knee and the prevalence of meniscus and cartilage lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017076897)

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze and compare the rate of secondary meniscus and cartilage lesions diagnosed at different time points of ACL reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search for articles comparing the rate of secondary meniscus and cartilage lesions diagnosed at different time points of ACL reconstruction was performed. PubMed central was the database used for the literature review.

RESULTS

Forty articles out of 1836 were included. In 35 trials (88%), there was evidence of a positive correlation between the rate of meniscus and/or cartilage lesions and the time since ACL injury. This correlation was more evident for the medial meniscus in comparison with the lateral meniscus. In particular, a delay of more than 6 months was critical for secondary medial meniscus injuries [risk ratio 0.58 (95% CI 0.44-0.79)] and a delay of more than 12 months was critical for cartilage injuries [risk ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.29-0.59)]. Additionally, there is evidence that the chance for meniscal repair decreases as the time since ACL rupture increases.

CONCLUSION

Chronic instability in the ACL-deficient knee is associated with a significant increase of medial meniscus injuries after 6 months followed by a significant increase of cartilage lesions after 12 months.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Nonathlete Population

BACKGROUND

There is considerable literature about revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in athletes vut there is little published evidence about the same in the nonathletes. The injury itself may remain underdiagnosed and untreated in nonsports persons. This study highlights the high incidence of ACL injury in the nonathletic patient cohort, revision rates, and the outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

856 nonathletic patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were included in this retrospective study. Patients were asked on phone whether they had undergone revision surgery and whether they had symptoms severe enough to seek reintervention. Clinical assessment and preoperative and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scoring were used to followup patients who underwent revision intervention.

RESULTS

Clinically, symptomatic revision rate was 5.9% (51 out of 856 patients), and 33 out of these 856 patients (3.9%) underwent revision ACL reconstruction. The reasons for revision were rupture of the previous graft in 21 and laxity (incompetence) of the graft in 12 patients. The mean preoperative and postoperative IKDC scores were 44.1 and 69.8, respectively, and the improvement was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The IKDC score following revision ACL reconstruction was significantly better in those patients who underwent revision <1 year following the onset of recurrent symptoms (P = 0.015). Meniscal tears were present in 47.6%, and chondral injuries were seen in 33.3% of patients. The tibial tunnel positioning was abnormal in 70% of patients. Femoral tunnel positioning was aberrant in all the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The revision rate of primary ACL reconstruction of 5.9% in nonathletes and revision ACL reconstruction rate of 3.9% are similar to the reported revision rates of 2.9%-5.8% in athletic patients. Similar to athletes, suboptimal tunnel placement is the major contributor to failure in nonathletes also.

Recurrent Instability Episodes and Meniscal or Cartilage Damage After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review

Background

Delayed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may be associated with increased risk of subsequent knee joint damage and osteoarthritis (OA). The relationship between recurrent instability episodes and meniscal or cartilage damage after first-time ACL injury is unknown.

Purpose

To assess the association between recurrent knee instability episodes and prevalence of meniscal lesions, cartilage damage, and OA after first-time ACL injury.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Six electronic databases were systematically searched using keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms. Studies selected were of English language, included original data, had a prospective design, and provided an outcome of recurrent instability and meniscal lesions, cartilage damage, or OA after first-time ACL injury. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were extracted or unadjusted ORs (95% CI) were calculated. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and 2 independent raters assessed study quality using Downs and Black criteria.

Results

Of 905 potentially relevant studies, 7 were included. Sample sizes ranged from 43 to 541, and Downs and Black scores ranged from 2 to 12. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Six studies reported a positive association between recurrent instability episodes and medial meniscal damage (OR range, 3.46 [95% CI, 1.24-9.99] to 11.56 [1.37-521.06]). The association between instability episodes and lateral meniscal or cartilage damage was inconsistent. No studies examined the association between instability episodes and OA.

Conclusion

This systematic review provides preliminary evidence that recurrent instability episodes after first-time ACL injury may be associated with increased odds of medial meniscal damage. This highlights the importance of early diagnosis, education, and treatment for individuals with ACL injury, all of which must include a specific focus on the prevention and management of instability episodes. High-quality, prospective cohort studies are needed that assess the effects of diagnostic and treatment delay, recurrent instability episodes on secondary meniscal and cartilage damage, and OA after an initial ACL injury.

Higher Gene Expression of Healing Factors in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with remnant preservation has been described and related to potential advantages. Literature is lacking regarding gene expression of potential factors related to ligament healing in the ACL remnant and its relation to time from injury.

HYPOTHESIS

The mRNA expression of ligament healing factors in the ACL remnant would be higher in acute tears (<3 months from injury) than in intermediate (3-12 months) and chronic (>12 months) injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Gene expression of 21 genes related to ligament healing factors was analyzed in 46 ACL remnants biopsied during surgical reconstruction with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction technique. Specimens were divided into 3 groups according to time from injury: acute (<3 months from injury; n = 19), intermediate (3-12 months; n = 12), and chronic (>12 months; n = 15). Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation was performed by analysis of hematoxylin and eosin, CD-34, and S-100 staining.

RESULTS

Expression of COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, COL5A2, COL12A1, LOX, PLOD1, and TNC genes in ACL remnant was greater in acute compared with chronic injuries. COL1A1, COL5A1, COL12A1, and TNC genes were also expressed more in the acute group compared with the intermediate group. Furthermore, expression of the genes COL1A1 and COL5A2 was significantly higher in female than in male patients. No difference in the number of blood vessels and mechanoreceptors among groups was observed in the microscopic evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that expression of COL1A1, COL1A2, COL3A1, COL5A1, COL5A2, COL12A1, LOX, PLOD1, and TNC genes in ACL remnant is greater in acute (<3 months from injury) compared with chronic (>12 months) injuries. Furthermore, COL1A1, COL5A1, COL12A1, and TNC genes were expressed more in the acute group compared with the intermediate group (3-12 months from injury).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

ACL reconstructions with remnant preservation should be performed in patients with acute injuries, as in these cases the ACL remnant may present the greatest healing potential.

Incidence and patterns of meniscal tears accompanying the anterior cruciate ligament injury: possible local and generalized risk factors

AIM OF THE WORK

Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is frequently accompanied by tears of the menisci. Some of these tears occur at the time of injury, but others develop over time in the ACL-deficient knee. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the patient characteristics, time from injury (TFI), and posterior tibial slope (PTS) on meniscal tear patterns. Our hypothesis was that meniscal tears would occur more frequently in ACL-deficient knees with increasing age, weight, TFI, PTS, and in male patients.

METHODS

Of the ACL-injured patients, 362 were analyzed, and details of meniscal lesions were collected. The medial and lateral tibial slopes (MTS, LTS) were measured via computed tomography. Patient demographics, TFI, MTS, and LTS were correlated with the diagnosed meniscal tears.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 113 had a medial meniscus (MM) tear, 54 patients had a lateral meniscus (LM) tear, 34 patients had tears of both menisci, and 161 patients had no meniscal tear. The most common tear location was the posterior horn (PH) of the MM, followed by tear involving the whole MM. Patient age, BMI, and TFI were significantly associated with the incidence of MM tear. Female patients had a higher incidence of injury than males in all tear sites except in the body and PH. Male patients had more vertical and peripheral tears. The median MTS and LTS for patients with MM tears were 7.0°and 8.7°, respectively, while those of patients with LM tears were 6.9° and 8.1°. Steeper LTS was significantly associated with tears of LM and of both menisci.

CONCLUSION

Older age, male sex, increased BMI, and prolonged TFI were significant factors for the development of MM tears. An increase in the tibial slope, especially of the lateral plateau, seems to increase the risk of tear of the LM and of both menisci.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Does age, time since injury and meniscal injury affect short term functional outcomes in arthroscopic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

PURPOSE

We conducted this study to correlate the short term clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with patients' age, time since injury and associated meniscal injury.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between October 2013 and February 2015 were taken for the study. Preoperative demographic data, clinical scores (Lysholm, IKDC) were recorded for each patient. Time since injury and associated meniscal injuries were recorded. Then a standardized surgical technique was used for each graft type. They were followed up for 6 months and the Lysholm and IKDC scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

Only 33 patients completed 6 months follow-up at the end of this study. Twenty-four patients (72.7%) were in the age group of 18-30 years. Nine patients belonged to age group 30-50 years (27.3%). The p value for differences in Lysholm scores between the two age groups was not significant (0.339). The p value for differences in IKDC scores between the two age groups was not significant either (0.138). The mean Lysholm scores were 93.86 ± 3.024 for the group who presented <6 months post-injury, 92 ± 5.494 for the group who presented between 6 months and 1 year and 94.64 ± 3.104 for the group who presented after 1 year; whereas the mean IKDC scores were 92.43 ± 0.793, 90.64 ± 6.598 and 90.89 ± 2.113 respectively. The correlation of outcomes with meniscal injury had no statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study, we conclude that age, time since injury and associated meniscal injury does not affect short term functional outcome in ACL reconstruction.

Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review

PURPOSE

To document the available evidence on the influence of cartilage lesions on the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery and their management to optimize the final outcome.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the PubMed database on articles dealing with cartilage lesions detected at the time of ACL reconstruction, by looking both for their influence on the clinical outcome and the results of their treatment. Reports on clinical, radiological, or second-look outcomes at any follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria were preclinical studies, reviews, or studies not reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look outcome after primary ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included for the final analysis. Twenty-seven focused on the influence of cartilage lesions on clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction in 47,837 patients. In total, 21/27 articles showed a correlation with a poorer outcome in terms of subjective, objective, and radiographic findings. Lesion location and depth influenced final results. Only 9.0 % of these defects were treated in the analysed studies, and only 10 manuscripts of overall low level evaluated the results of combined cartilage-ACL treatments.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the literature supports the clinical relevance of cartilage lesions which are correlated with a poorer outcome after ACL reconstruction. Nonetheless, a large amount of chondral defects are actually not addressed, also considering the poor evidence for the benefits provided by cartilage treatments. In fact, only a few studies specifically focused on how to manage cartilage lesions found during ACL reconstruction and there is a lack of indications for the most appropriate treatment approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

High failure rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bimeniscal repair: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Bimeniscal lesions are common in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. However, bimeniscal repair is rarely performed during ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes after ACL reconstruction with bimeniscal repair.

HYPOTHESIS

Bimeniscal lesions, even when repaired, are associated with poorer outcomes of ACL reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective case-control design was used. The cases were 15 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, without procedures on any other ligaments, combined with bimeniscal repair, between May 2009 and May 2013 (3.2% of all ACL reconstructions during the study period). This group (2-Mc group) was matched on age, gender, body mass index, and time to surgery to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and had no meniscal lesions (0-Mc group) and to 30 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and repair of the medial meniscus (1-Mc group). After a mean follow-up of 3.6 years, clinical outcomes were assessed based on the KOOS, Lysholm, and IKDC scores and knee laxity based on TELOS and GNRB measurements. The primary outcome measure was the rate of ACL re-rupture. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcomes and rate of delayed meniscectomy.

RESULTS

The ACL re-rupture rate was significantly higher in the 2-Mc group than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled (20%, vs. 1.7%; P=0.02). The functional scores showed no significant differences across groups. Post-operative differential laxity was significantly greater in the 2-Mc group (3.3mm by TELOS, P=0.02; and 2.5mm by GNRB, P=0.03) than in the 0-Mc and 1-Mc groups pooled. Delayed meniscectomy was performed in none of the 2-Mc group patients and in 2 of the 1-Mc group patients.

CONCLUSION

ACL reconstruction combined with bimeniscal repair is a rarely performed procedure. It is associated with a high ACL re-rupture rate and greater differential laxity. Meniscal outcomes of bimeniscal repair, in contrast, are good.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, matched case-control study.

LARS™ in ACL reconstruction: evaluation of 60 cases with 5-year minimum follow-up

PURPOSE

The injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) causes joint instability and, in the absence of adequate treatment, progressive joint deterioration, meniscal lesions and development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes and complications in a consecutive case series of 60 patients with minimum follow-up of 5 years who underwent an arthroscopic surgery for ACL reconstruction using LARS™ ligament. Patients with concomitant meniscal or chondral lesions in the same knee were excluded.

RESULTS

The subjective evaluation of the patients involved in the study (Lysholm score, IKDC score and Tegner activity level scale) shows good/excellent results. The range of movement is optimal in most patients, and pain symptoms are considered mild. A total of 31.25% of the patients did not change their lifestyle that they had before the injury. None of the patients underwent resurgery in the same knee. In 85.4% of cases, X-ray images showed no signs of osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable with other series showed in the literature, this study assesses that the use of LARS™ in reconstruction of ACL is an excellent option for treating >40-year-old patients requesting rapid return to daily activities/sports also at the first surgery. By restoring knee stability, articular degeneration at short and medium follow-up was avoided.

A 10-year Retrospective Review of Functional Outcomes of Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is an increasingly prevalent sporting injury in adolescents. Surgical reconstruction of the ACL in adolescents has been controversial and there has been little reported on functional outcomes after surgery.The aim of this study was to undertake a retrospective notes review and questionnaire survey of a group of adolescents who had their ACL surgically reconstructed over the previous 10 years, assessing delay to surgery, levels of meniscal damage, reoperation rates, and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 100 adolescent patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using a transphyseal technique. These patients were also contacted and completed the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

RESULTS

One hundred patients had their records reviewed. The average age at follow-up was 20.5 (SD, 2.4) years. There were 49 females and 51 males. Meniscal tears were present in 76% of patients at the time of surgery. The rate of medial meniscal tears increased with delay to surgical intervention beyond 3 months. Reoperation rate for these patients was 24%.Eighty patients completed the KOOS questionnaire. Patients were a mean of 4 (SD, 2.2) years postsurgery. The main findings indicate that in the 5 key KOOS domains patients scored a mean of 60 (SD, 13) for symptoms, 65 (SD, 10) for pain, 70 (SD, 6.4) for activities of daily living, 54 (SD, 17.6) for sport and recreation, and 47.2 (SD, 20.1) for quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that young people with ACL injuries have a very high associated incidence of meniscal pathology at the time of surgery. There is a high reoperation rate for meniscal surgery and graft failure. Four years post-ACL reconstruction many have not yet returned to a fully functional state.Further research to understand why functional outcomes are modest is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-retrospective case series.

Long-term follow-up of isolated ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The incidence of subsequent meniscal tears and arthritis among patients with isolated ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare the risk of subsequent meniscal tears and osteoarthritis (OA) between patients with isolated ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction and a matched cohort of individuals without ACL tears and (2) examine factors predictive of long-term sequelae after non-operative treatment of isolated ACL tears.

METHODS

This study compared a population-based incidence cohort of 364 patients with new-onset, isolated ACL tears between 1990 and 2000, to an age and sex-matched cohort of 364 individuals without ACL tears. A chart review was performed to collect information related to the initial injury, treatment, and outcomes. Subjects were retrospectively followed for mean follow-up of 14.3 years (±7.4 years) to determine the development of subsequent meniscal injury, arthritis, or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

RESULTS

Patients treated without ligament reconstruction after ACL tears had a significantly higher risk of secondary meniscal tears (HR 18.0, 95 % CI 9.7, 33.3), arthritis (HR 14.2, 95 % CI 8.0, 25.2), and need of TKA (HR 5.0, 95 % CI 2.1, 12.2) than individuals without ACL tears. Lateral meniscal tear at diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of arthritis (HR 2.7, 95 % CI 1.4, 5.7) and TKA (HR 4.3, 95 % CI 1.3, 13.7). Treatment with meniscectomy was associated with an increased risk of additional meniscal tears (HR 51.5, 95 % CI 10.3, 936.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated non-operatively after isolated ACL tears are at a significantly higher risk of secondary meniscal tears, arthritis, and TKA when compared to age and sex-matched subjects without ACL tears. Additionally, baseline lateral meniscal tears were significantly associated with an increased probability of developing arthritis and the need for TKA. This information may be helpful when counselling patients about the natural history of ACL tears treated without ligament reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction within the first year after trauma and its influence on treatment of cartilage and meniscus pathology

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are often associated with primary meniscal and cartilage lesions. Late reconstruction of ACL-deficient knees may increase the risk of developing secondary meniscal and cartilage lesions; hence, the timing of ACL repair is of the utmost importance. Because meniscus outcome is also a potential predictor for osteoarthritis (OA), this study compared ACL repair within the first 6 months after injury to that of surgery conducted 7-12 months after injury with regard to the incidence of meniscal and cartilage lesions.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study included all complete isolated primary ACL ruptures treated in our institution within 1 year after trauma over a 12-month period. Exclusion criteria were revision ACL, complex ligament injuries, previous knee surgery, and missing injury data. Cartilage lesions were classified according to the score established by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS score) and meniscal tears according to their treatment options.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-three of 730 patients (162 men, 71 women) with ACL repair met the inclusion criteria. 86.3 % of surgical interventions were conducted within 6 months and 13.7 % after 6 months of trauma. Severe cartilage lesions grade III-IV did not significantly differ between the different time points of ACL repair (<6 months 39.9 %; >6 months 31.3 %; p = n.s.). Medial meniscus lesions received significantly higher meniscal repair in early compared to delayed ACL repair. Significantly higher rate of meniscal repair of the medial meniscus was seen in cases of early ACL repair compared to delayed (<6 months 77.2 %, >6 months 46.7; p = 0.022). The rate of medial meniscal repair in early ACL repair was significantly higher for women (89.5-0 %; p = 0.002), however, not for men (73.3-53.8 %; p = n.s.). No differences were found for lateral meniscal lesions, with regard to neither the different time points (p = n.s.) nor the sex (p = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the significantly higher rate of prognostically advantageous meniscal repair, the recommendation for an ACL reconstruction within 6 months after trauma was made to preserve the meniscus and reduce the risk of developing OA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cross-sectional cohort study, Level II.

Temporal relation of meniscal tear incidence, severity, and outcome scores in adolescents undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is increasingly common in adolescents. Time between ACL rupture and surgical reconstruction, surgical wait time, is related to concurrent meniscal tear incidence and possibly tear pattern. This study defines the relationship between meniscal tear characteristics and surgical wait time in adolescents with ACL rupture.

METHODS

One-hundred and twenty-one consecutive adolescent (median age 16.1 years, range 9-19 years) ACL rupture patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were studied. All had documented surgical wait time, preoperative and 6-month post-operative outcome (Lysholm and pedi-IKDC) scores, and intraoperative meniscus tear characteristics. Meniscal tear severity was graded according to the Lawrence and Anderson system: non-surgical: grade 1; reparable: grade 2-3; irreparable: grade 4-5. Significant tears were defined as at least grade 2.

RESULTS

Average age at surgery was 16.1 years. 48.7 % had surgical wait time greater than 6 months. 42.5 % of menisci were torn. With surgical wait time <6 months, there were more lateral than medial tears (48 vs 21 %, p = 0.001). With surgical wait time >6 months, medial tear incidence increased (50 vs 21 %, p < 0.001), there were more significant tears (63 vs 42 %, OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and preoperative Lysholm and pedi-IKDC scores were lower (58 vs 74, p < 0.001; 52 vs 61, p < 0.007). Scores were lower in patients with meniscus tears (63.8 vs 69.3, n.s.; 53.9 vs 60.5, p = .04). Patients with public insurance had risks of surgical wait time greater than 3 months (OR 12.4, p < 0.001) and 6 months (OR 7.8, p < 0.001), and of a significant meniscus tear (OR 2.5, p = 0.03). Six-month post-operative pedi-IKDC scores improved more in meniscus tear patients (28.4 vs 21, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows a significant increase in medial meniscal tear incidence, decrease in preoperative scores, and worse tear severity with surgical wait time >6 months. Public insurance was a risk factor for longer surgical wait time and meniscus tear.