Iatrogenic injury of the anterior meniscal root attachments following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel reaming

Graft Suturing Method Affects on Graft Diameter in Hamstring-Based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

 Various benefits of needleless suture loop techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preparation have been discussed, yet their impact on graft diameter remains unexplored. We hypothesized that the suture loop technique would reduce the graft diameter compared to the conventional locking suture technique.

METHODS

 Fifty-seven patients whose grafts were made with the Krackow stitch (group K) and 54 patients with the suture loop (group SL) were analyzed retrospectively. (1) The distal (sutured side) diameter of each anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle was compared to the proximal (non-sutured side) diameter, and (2) the average of the proximal and distal graft diameters in each group was calculated.

RESULTS

 In group K, 78.9% of anteromedial bundles and 40.3% of posterolateral bundles exhibited a larger distal diameter than the proximal, while in group SL, 42.6% of anteromedial bundles and 3.7% of posterolateral bundles showed a larger distal diameter. In both bundles, there were significantly fewer grafts with larger distal diameters in group SL (p < 0.001). The mean distal diameter of anteromedial bundles was smaller in group SL (6.33 ± 0.43 mm vs. 6.07 ± 0.43 mm, p < 0.005). Consequently, the distal cross-sectional area of anteromedial bundles in group SL was 8% smaller than that in group K.

CONCLUSION

 The use of the suture loop technique resulted in a significantly smaller distal diameter of the anteromedial bundle. This reduces the size of the tibial tunnel and may contribute to a reduction in potential damage to adjacent structures.

Morphometric Analysis of the Tibial Attachment Shape of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Its Relationship With the Location of the Anterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus

BACKGROUND

The success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction relies on the accurate replication of the native ACL anatomy, including attachment shapes. The tibial attachment of the ACL exhibits significant shape variations with elliptical, C, and triangular shapes, highlighting the need for objective classification methods and additional information to identify individual anatomic variations.

HYPOTHESIS

The location of the attachment of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) may determine the shape of the ACL attachment.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The study used 25 knees from 17 Japanese cadavers for macroscopic anatomic examination and quantitative analysis. The shape of the ACL attachment was quantified using principal component analysis with elliptical Fourier descriptors, whereas the AHLM location was quantified by measuring its mediolateral and anteroposterior positions on the superior surface of the tibia. Reliability was assessed statistically.

RESULTS

The shape of the tibial attachment of the ACL varied among individuals and was classified as elliptical, C-shaped, or triangular. Scatterplots of the principal components of the ACL attachment shape showed overlapping regions of elliptical, C-shaped, and triangular ACL attachments, indicating that a C-shaped attachment is intermediate between elliptical and triangular attachments. The location of the AHLM attachment also varied, with areas in the anterolateral, anteromedial, or posteromedial region. The ACL shape and AHLM location were related, with elliptical, C-shaped, and triangular ACL attachments corresponding to anterolateral, anteromedial, and posteromedial AHLM attachments, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AHLM attachment location influences the shape of the ACL attachment. Information on the location of the AHLM attachment can aid in predicting the shape of the ACL attachment during ACL reconstruction, potentially improving footprint coverage.

Improved tibiofemoral contact restoration after transtibial reinsertion of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus compared to in situ repair: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

To compare biomechanical behaviour of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus (ARLM) after a transtibial repair (TTR) and after an in situ repair (ISR), discussing the reasons for the efficacy of the more advantageous technique.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric human knees were tested at flexion angles from 0° to 90° in four conditions of their ARLM: intact, detached, reinserted using TTR, and reinserted using ISR. Specimens were subjected to 1000 N of compression, and the contact area (CA), mean pressure (MP), and peak pressure (PP) on the tibial cartilage were computed. For the TTR, traction force on the sutures was registered.

RESULTS

ARLM detachment significantly altered contact biomechanics, mainly at shallow flexion. After ISR, differences compared to the healthy group persisted (extension, CA 22% smaller (p = 0.012); at 30°, CA 30% smaller (p = 0.012), MP 21%, and PP 32% higher (both p = 0.017); at 60°, CA 28% smaller (p = 0.012), MP 32%, and PP 49% higher (both p = 0.025). With TTR, alterations significantly decreased compared to the injured group, with no statistical differences from the intact ones observed, except for CA at extension (15% decrease, p = 0.012) and at 30° (12% decrease, p = 0.017). The suture tension after TTR, given as mean(SD), was 36.46(11.75)N, 44.32(11.71)N, 40.38(14.93)N, and 43.18(14.89)N for the four tested flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

Alterations caused by ARLM detachment were partially restored with both ISR and TTR, with TTR showing better results on recovering CA, MP, and PP in the immediate postoperative period. The tensile force was far below the value reported to cause meniscal cut-out in porcine models.

Imaging the pediatric anterior cruciate ligament: not little adults

An increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in children over the last few decades has led to a corresponding increase in ACL reconstruction procedures in children. In this review, we will illustrate unique features seen when imaging the ACL in children versus adults. After briefly reviewing relevant normal ACL anatomy, we will review imaging findings of congenital ACL dysplasia. This is followed by a discussion of imaging ACL avulsions. Lastly, we will review the different types of ACL reconstruction procedures performed in skeletally immature children and their post-operative appearances.

A balance between native footprint coverage and overlap of the anterolateral meniscal root in tibial tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 3D MRI study

BACKGROUND

Tibial footprint of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is situated close to the anterior lateral meniscal root (ALMR) attachment.

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the size and location of the tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction on the ACL footprint coverage and overlap to the ALMR.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twenty knee MRI scans from twenty healthy subjects were recruited, and three-dimensional (3D) tibia models were created to show the tibial attachment sites of ACL and ALMR. Surgical simulation of the tibial tunnel drilling was performed on each 3D model, entering the joint at an angle set at 60 degrees from the tibial plateau plane and 55 degrees from the posterior tibial condylar axis, with analysis for six different drill sizes; 7.5, 8, 8.5, 9, 9.5 and 10 mm; and nine locations; the center of the ACL attachment and eight locations 2% of the tibial width apart surrounding it. The width of the tibial plateau, the distance between ACL and ALMR attachment centers, and the size and location of the potential tibial tunnel were evaluated to determine association with the area of the ACL footprint coverage and ALMR overlap using a linear mixed effects model.

RESULTS

A large tunnel (p <.001), a central and anterior location (p <.029), and small tibial width (p =.015) were all associated with larger coverage of the ACL footprint. A large tunnel (p <.001), posteriorly and laterally located (p ≤ 0.001), and a small distance between the ACL and ALMR centers (p =.001) were significantly associated with a larger ALMR overlap. The association of the tunnel size to ALMR overlap reduced with a medial tunnel location.

CONCLUSIONS

The short distance between the centers of the ALMR attachment and native ACL footprint suggests that the ALMR will always be susceptible to overlap when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction. Small alterations in tunnel location can lead to a statistically significant alteration with the amount of ALMR overlap. To minimize this overlap, whilst maintaining acceptable coverage of the ACL footprint, a tibial tunnel positioned in a medial or anteromedial location from the center of the ACL footprint is recommended.

Effect of Anterior Horn Tears of the Lateral Meniscus on Knee Stability

Background

Investigations on the biomechanical characteristics of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial tunnel reaming have revealed increased contact pressure between the femur and tibia, decreased attachment area, and decreased ultimate failure strength.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a complete radial tear of the AHLM on force distribution in response to applied anterior and posterior drawer forces and internal and external rotation torques. We hypothesized that the AHLM plays an important role in knee stability, primarily at lower knee flexion angles.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens and a robotic testing system were used. Anterior and posterior drawer forces up to 89 N and internal and external rotation torques up to 4 N·m were applied at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. A complete AHLM tear was then made 10 mm from the lateral border of the tibial attachment of the ACL, and the same tests performed in the intact state were repeated. Next, the recorded intact knee motion was reproduced in the AHLM-torn knee, and the change in the resultant force after an AHLM tear was determined by calculating the difference between the 2 states.

Results

In the torn AHLM, the reduction in the resultant force at 0° for external rotation torque (34.8 N) was larger than that at 60° (5.2 N; P < .01) and 90° (6.7 N; P < .01).

Conclusion

The AHLM played a role in facilitating knee stability against an applied posterior drawer force of 89 N and external rotation torque of 4 N·m, especially at lower knee flexion angles.

Clinical Relevance

This study provides information about the effects of AHLM injuries that may occur during single-bundle ACL reconstruction using a round tunnel.

Better Coverage of the ACL Tibial Footprint and Less Injury to the Anterior Root of the Lateral Meniscus Using a Rounded-Rectangular Tibial Tunnel in ACL Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

Background

To better restore the anatomy of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachment and fiber arrangement, researchers have developed techniques for changing the shape of the ACL bone tunnel during ACL reconstruction.

Purpose

To compare the coverage of the ACL tibial footprint and influence on the anterior root of lateral meniscus (ARLM) between a rounded-rectangular tibial tunnel and a conventional round tibial tunnel for ACL reconstruction.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 16 (8 matched-paired) fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were distributed randomly into 2 groups: a rounded-rectangular tunnel (RRT) group and a round tunnel (RT) group. One of the knees from each pair was reamed with rounded-rectangular tibial tunnel, whereas the other was reamed with round tibial tunnel. Coverage of the ACL tibial footprint and areas of ARLM attachment before and after reaming were measured using 3-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

In the RRT group, the average percentage of ACL tibial footprint covered by the tunnel was 70.8% ± 2.5%, which was significantly higher than that in the RT group (48.2% ± 6.4%) (P = .012). As for the ARLM attachment area, in the RT group, there was a significant decrease (22.5% ± 5.9%) in ARLM attachment area after tibial tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P < .001). Conversely, in the RRT group, the ARLM attachment area was not significantly affected by tibial tunnel reaming.

Conclusion

Rounded-rectangular tibial tunnel was able to better cover the native ACL tibial footprint and significantly lower the risk of iatrogenic injury to the ARLM attachment than round tibial tunnel during ACL reconstruction.

Flat-Tunnel Technique With Independently Tensioned Bundles Better Restores Rotational Stability Than Round-Tunnel Technique in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Graft: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the kinematics differences between round-tunnel (ROT) and flat-tunnel (FLT) techniques in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction when using hamstring graft.

METHODS

Nine matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were evaluated for the kinematics of intact, ACL-sectioned, and either ROT or FLT reconstructed knees. The graft bundles for FLT technique were separately tensioned. A 6 degrees of freedom robotic system was used to assess knee laxity: (1) 134-N anterior tibial load at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°of knee flexion; (2) 10 Nm of valgus torque followed by 5 Nm of internal rotation torque simulates a pivot-shift test at 15° and 30°; (3) 5-Nm internal and external rotation torques at 0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90°; (4) 10-Nm varus and valgus torques at 15° and 30°.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found for ROT versus FLT techniques in terms of the simulated pivot-shift test at 15° (2.5 mm vs 1.4 mm, respectively, difference from intact; P =.039) and the internal rotation test at 15° (2.5° vs 0.5°, respectively, difference from intact; P =.034) and 30° (2.0° vs 0.4°, respectively, difference from intact; P =.014). No significant differences were found between groups during 134-N anterior tibial load, external rotation and valgus/varus rotation. Neither technique was able to reproduce the intact state during an anterior tibial load and simulated pivot-shift test.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLT technique with independently tensioned bundles shows the same anterior control as the ROT technique but better restores rotational stability in terms of the simulated pivot-shift test and the internal rotation test in anatomic ACL reconstruction at time zero.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The FLT technique with independently tensioned bundles of ACL reconstruction appears to be a viable, more anatomic technique than the ROT technique in mimicking flat anatomy and rotational stability of native ACL.

Partial lateral meniscus anterior root injuries during anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are likely to occur in women with small skeletons

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and characteristics of lateral meniscus anterior root injuries during anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2018, 70 women who had ACL injuries without lateral meniscal tears underwent anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Using computed tomography, the anatomical relationship between the predicted lateral meniscus anterior root insertion and the tibial tunnel was retrospectively assessed, and the patients were divided into partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury and intact groups. The demographic characteristics, the distances between bony landmarks, the tibial tunnel sizes, and lateral meniscal extrusion assessed by magnetic resonance imaging were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 70 patients had suspected partial lateral meniscus anterior root injuries. Patient height was significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group (157.7 ± 6.4 vs. 161.4 ± 5.4 cm: p = 0.03); the distance from the apex to the bottom of the slope of the medial intercondylar ridge was significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group (15.1 ± 1.9 vs. 16.7 ± 1.4 mm: p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury during anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction was suspected in 18% of cases. Patient height and the distance between bony landmarks were significantly shorter in the injury group than in the intact group. Surgeons should understand that even a slight deviation of the tibial tunnel position can lead to partial lateral meniscus anterior root injury in patients with small skeletons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

ACL injury and reconstruction affect control of ground reaction forces produced during a novel task that simulates cutting movements

After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction, biomechanical and neuromuscular control deficits persist and 25% of those who have experienced an ACL injury will experience a second ACL rupture in the first year after returning to sports. There remains a need for improved rehabilitation and the ability to detect an individual's risk of secondary ACL rupture. Nonlinear analysis metrics, such as the largest Lyapunov exponent (LyE) can provide new biomechanical insight in this population by identifying how movement patterns evolve over time. The purpose of this study was to determine how ACL injury, ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and participation in high-performance athletics affect control strategies, evaluated through nonlinear analysis, produced during a novel task that simulates forces generated during cutting movements. Uninjured recreational athletes, those with ACL injury who have not undergone reconstruction (ACLD [ACL deficient]), those who have undergone ACL reconstruction, and high-performance athletes completed a task that simulates cutting forces. The LyE calculated from forces generated during this novel task was greater (ie, force control was diminished) in the involved limb of ACLD and ACLR groups when compared with healthy uninjured controls and high-performance athletes. These data suggest that those who have experienced an ACL injury and subsequent reconstructive surgery exhibit poor force control when compared with both uninjured controls and high-performance athletes. Clinical significance: significantly larger LyE values after ACL injury and reconstruction when compared with healthy athletes suggest a continuing deficit in force control not addressed by current rehabilitation protocols and evaluation metrics that could contribute to secondary ACL rupture.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Ribbon-Like Graft With a C-Shaped Tibial Bone Tunnel

According to recent anatomic studies, the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) appears to be a flat, "ribbon-like" structure, with a thin, oval-shaped insertion on the femur and a C-shaped tibial insertion. According to this anatomy, we describe an ACL-reconstruction technique that aims to approximate this natural anatomy. The basic principle of this technique is not to use conventional round tunnels but create tunnel shapes that resemble more closely the original ACL insertion sites. Using either a rectangular quadriceps tendon graft or a "flat" hamstring graft may not only provide a biomechanical advantage with increased rotational stability but also improve bone-tendon healing due to increased bone-tendon contact and decreased diffusion length. Creating a C-shaped tibial tunnel also avoids laceration of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, which is frequently harmed during conventional tibial tunnel drilling.

The interrelationship between anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint and anterolateral meniscal root insertions: Quantitative, morphological and positional analyses using three-dimensional computed tomography images

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate quantitative, morphological and positional differences between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial footprint and anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) insertion and investigate an intraoperative landmark to estimate their boundaries.

METHODS

Thirty-three fixed human cadaveric knees were evaluated. After resecting the components, the anterior fiber (AF) and posterior fiber (PF) of ALMR, the tibial center of ACL bundles (anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles) and ACL were marked. Insertion morphology was classified into three categories, and the distance and relative positional relationship between AF/PF insertions and the center of each attachment were measured on three-dimensional computed tomography images.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the AF of AM and ACL (P = 0.16), but both were significantly shorter than the AF of PL (both P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the PF of ACL and PL (P = 0.99), which were significantly shorter than PF of AM (both P < 0.001). Morphology of the ACL tibial insertion was classified as follows: triangular, 15 knees (45.5%); oval, 18 knees (54.5%); none, C-shape. Quantitative and positional analyses showed that the AF insertion was significantly closer to AM and ACL centers in the oval type than in the triangular type. Excluding two cases, the AF/PF insertion was located laterally to the ML center of the medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles.

CONCLUSION

Proximity of ACL tibial footprint and ALMR varies by their footprint morphology. The medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles were useful landmarks for ALMR injury prevention.

Tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament and anterior horn of the lateral meniscus share the lateral slope of the medial intercondylar ridge: A computed tomography study in a young, healthy population

BACKGROUND

The central intercondylar ridge (CIR) is an anatomical bony landmark that bisects the slope of the medial intercondylar ridge (MIR) between the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterior horn of lateral meniscus (AHLM) and was recently revealed by computed tomography (CT) evaluation corresponding to histologic slices of cadaveric knees. The purpose of this study was to clarify the shape and size of ACL and AHLM tibial insertion in young, healthy knees using the new bony landmark (CIR) and previously reported landmarks.

METHODS

The contralateral healthy knees in 34 ACL-reconstructed patients (18 male patients, 16 female patients, mean age: 24.0 years) were scanned by CT. In the reconstructed coronal/sagittal images, bony landmarks of ACL (anterior: anterior ridge, posterior: blood vessel in tubercle fossa, medial: MIR, lateral: CIR) and AHLM (medial: CIR, lateral: bottom of the slope) were plotted for evaluation. The length of sagittal slices and the width in five coronal slices of the insertion were measured.

RESULTS

The ACL insertion consistently showed a boot-like-shape adjacent to the square shape of AHLM on three-dimensional imaging. The mean ACL sagittal length was 14.5 ± 1.9 mm, while the mean ACL widths (in mm) from anterior to posterior were 12.7 ± 2.7, 8.1 ± 1.9, 7.9 ± 2.0, 7.5 ± 1.5, and 7.2 ± 1.6, which was highly correlated with the tibial plateau size.

CONCLUSIONS

The boot-like-shape of the ACL tibial footprint insertion shared the slope of MIR with the rectangular shape of AHLM in young, healthy knees. This study may provide useful information for safe tibial tunnel creation at the time of ACL reconstruction.

Relationship between anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral meniscal root bony attachment: High-resolution 3-T MRI analysis

BACKGROUND

The tibial bony attachments of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) are very close, and drilling the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction may damage the ALMR attachment. This study investigated the relationship between the tibial attachment of the ACL and ALMR using high-resolution 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects (35.8 ± 13.0 years) had 20 knees scanned using high resolution 3-T MRI. The tibial bony attachments of ACL, ALMR, and the tibia were segmented and three-dimensional models were created. The shape, area, and location of each attachment were evaluated using this model.

RESULTS

The ACL tibial attachment was elliptical in nine knees (45%), C-shaped in nine knees (45%) and triangle in two knees (10%). The mean values of the ACL vs ALMR tibial attachments were as follows: area, 106.2 ± 21.3 vs 56.2 ± 21.3 mm²; length, 16.8 ± 2.0 vs 11.0 ± 1.8 mm; and width, 6.9 ± 1.3 vs 6.6 ± 1.0 mm. The location of the ACL vs ALMR attachment centres was 46.5 ± 1.7% vs 56.5 ± 1.9% in the medial-lateral direction and 36.3 ± 3.6% vs 36.7 ± 3.5% in the anterior-posterior direction. The distance between the ACL and ALMR centres was 8.1 ± 1.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

ACL and ALMR tibial attachments were individually distinguished using high resolution 3-T MRI. The short distance between both centres of the attachments may suggest that ALMR can be damaged when the tibial tunnel is drilled in ACL reconstruction.

Anatomical relationship between insertion sites, tunnel placement, and lateral meniscus anterior horn injury during single and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: A comparative macroscopic and histopathological evaluation in cadavers

PURPOSE

The influence of tunnel extension outside the anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion in single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the anatomical relationship between ACL insertion and tunnel extension in SB and DB ACL reconstruction, and the impact of tibial tunnel extension to the insertion of anterior horn of lateral meniscus in terms of injury.

METHODS

Forty-six paired cadaver knees (mean age, 82.7 ± 10.7 years) were used. Right and left knees were used for SB (10 mm) and DB tunnel reaming (6 mm for the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles). Tibial and femoral tunnels were created to aim at the center of the ACL insertion by arthroscopic visualization. The relationship between tunnel extension and ACL insertion was evaluated macroscopically, and there ratio in two groups were compared by chi-square test. Further, the relative risk for meniscus injury based on tunnel placement was estimated. Coronal section of tibia and parallel section to Blumensaat line in femur were prepared to evaluate the relationship among tunnel position, ACL insertion, and anterior horn of the meniscus histologically.

RESULTS

Tibial tunnel extension out of the ACL insertion was observed macroscopically in 9 (39.1%) knees of the SB group, and 3 (13.0%) of the DB group (p = 0.045). In femoral tunnels, extension out of the ACL insertion was seen in 8 (34.8%) knees of the SB group and 1 (4.3%) of the DB group (p = 0.011). Partial injuries of the lateral meniscus anterior horn (LMAH) were observed in 5 (21.7%) knees of the SB group and 1 (4.3%) knee of the DB group (p = 0.091). The relative risk for LMAH injury was calculated as 5.0 (odds ratio, 6.1). Microscopically, SB tunnels appeared to expand out of ACL insertion, both in the femur and tibia.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of tunnel extension out of the ACL insertion in femur and tibia were higher with SB than with DB reconstruction. Furthermore, injury rate of the LMAH in the DB group was lower.

Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Tendon Autograft through Single Femoral Tunnel and Single Branched Tibial Tunnel

Conventional single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction cannot improve the rotational stability of the knee. Traditional double-bundle ACL reconstruction requires is demanding, complex, time- and implant consuming, and associated with a high incidence of complications. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a free quadriceps tendon autograft through 3 independent tunnels provides some advantage, but the antegrade graft passage, tibial tunnel confluence, and graft site morbidity represent disadvantages. This Technical Note describes a modification of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the hamstring tendon autograft through a single branched tibial tunnel and a single femoral tunnel using 2 interference screws (Arthrex, Naples, FL). The gracilis tendon autograft is passed through tibial tunnel stem to the posterolateral tibial tunnel branch to the posterolateral position in the femoral tunnel. The semitendinosus tendon autograft is passed through the tibial tunnel stem to the anteromedial tibial tunnel branch to the anteromedial position in the femoral tunnel. Both grafts are fixed by 2 interference screws: 1 at the femoral tunnel and 1 at the tibial tunnel stem with the knee at 20° flexion.

Tibial insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament and the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus: A histological and computed tomographic study

BACKGROUND

A positional relationship between the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM) has not previously been a topic of interest in the literature because the AHLM is already known to be obviously adjacent to the ACL and is assumed as a lateral border. The objective of this study was to investigate the positional anatomic relationship between the ACL and AHLM by histological evaluation of sequential slices and computed tomography (CT) of the tibial insertion sites.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The ACL has a specific positional relationship with the AHLM and there is an identifiable distinct bony border between them. The position of the AHLM could be an important and useful landmark for accurate tibial tunnel positioning in anatomical ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve ACL-intact knees from embalmed cadavers were used in this study. Six knees were sectioned into four slices for histologic examination in the coronal planes parallel to the AHLM alignment. Before sectioning, these knees were subjected to three-dimensional (3-D) volume-rendering CT. Each of the four slices demonstrated the insertion area of the ACL relative to the position of the AHLM. Each histologic slice was compared with the corresponding CT image. Only histological examination in the sagittal planes was performed in the other six knees.

RESULTS

The ACL fibres were broadly attached at the region anterior to the AHLM. However, the ACL and AHLM shared a clear border identifiable on the coronal CT images and appeared as a prominence of the bony ridge on the 3-D CT images. No dense ACL fibres were attached to the region posterior to the AHLM. Based on the histological data, the geometry of the ACL tibial insertion was L-shaped along the AHLM.

CONCLUSION

The ACL and AHLM have a specific positional relationship not only in the mediolateral direction but also anteroposteriorly. The AHLM serves not only as a lateral border, but also as a useful reference in an anterioposterior direction for tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction. Specifically, the ACL fibres were found to be broadly attached onto the bony surface in the region anterior to the AHLM and there was no firm attachment of the ACL in the region posterior to the AHLM on the tibial side, which is useful in avoiding posterior tunnel placement.

Does anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft produce anterolateral meniscal root tearing?

Background

To determine if tibial tunnel reaming during anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft can result in anterolateral meniscal root injury, as diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

A case series of 104 primary anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstructions using hamstring autograft was retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and post-operative (>1 year) MRIs were radiologically evaluated for each patient, with a lateral meniscus extrusion > 3 mm at the level of the medial collateral ligament midportion on a coronal MRI, to establish anterolateral meniscal root injury.

Results

No patients presented radiological findings of anterolateral meniscal root injury in this case series.

Conclusions

Examining a single-bundle ACL reconstruction technique using hamstring autograft that considered tibial tunnel positioning in the center of the tibial footprint, this case series found no evidence of anterolateral meniscal root injury in patient MRIs, even more than 1-year post-operation.

Early Osteoarthritis After Untreated Anterior Meniscal Root Tears: An In Vivo Animal Study

Background:

Meniscal root tears cause menisci and their insertions to inadequately distribute loads and potentially leave underlying articular cartilage unprotected. Untreated meniscal root tears are becoming increasingly recognized to induce joint degradation; however, little information is known about anterior meniscal root tears and how they affect joint tissue.

Purpose:

To observe the early degenerative changes within the synovial fluid, menisci, tibial articular cartilage, and subchondral bone after arthroscopic creation of untreated anterior meniscal root tears.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Anterolateral meniscal root tears were created in 1 knee joint of 5 adult Flemish Giant rabbits, and anteromedial meniscal root tears were created in 4 additional rabbits. The contralateral limbs were used as nonoperated controls. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postoperatively; synovial fluid was aspirated, and tissue samples of menisci and tibial articular cartilage were collected and processed for multiple analyses to detect signs of early degeneration.

Results:

Significant changes were found within the synovial fluid, meniscal tissue, and tibial subchondral bone of the knees with anterior meniscal root tears when compared with controls. There were no significant changes identified in the tibial articular cartilage when comparing the tear groups with controls.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated early degenerative changes within the synovial fluid, menisci, and tibial subchondral bone when leaving anterior meniscal root tears untreated for 8 weeks. The results suggest that meniscal tissue presents measurable, degenerative changes prior to changes within the articular cartilage after anterior meniscal root tears. Anterior destabilization of the meniscus arthroscopically may lead to measurable degenerative changes and be useful for future in vivo natural history and animal repair studies.

Clinical Relevance:

The present study is the first to investigate various tissue changes after anterior meniscal root tears of both the medial and lateral menisci. The results from this study suggest that degenerative changes occur within the synovial fluid, meniscus, and tibial subchondral bone prior to any measurable changes to the tibial articular cartilage. Further studies should expand on this study to evaluate how these components continue to progress when left untreated for long periods.

Overlap Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Meniscal Root Insertions: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral meniscal root (ALMR) has been reported to intricately insert underneath the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Previous studies have begun to evaluate the relationship between the insertion areas and the risk of iatrogenic injuries; however, the overlap of the insertions has yet to be quantified in the sagittal and coronal planes.

PURPOSE

To investigate the insertions of the human tibial ACL and ALMR using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and to quantify the overlap of the ALMR insertion in the coronal and sagittal planes.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric knees were dissected to isolate the tibial ACL and ALMR insertions. Specimens were prepared and imaged in the coronal and sagittal planes. After imaging, fiber directions were examined to identify the insertions and used to calculate the percentage of the ACL that overlaps with the ALMR instead of inserting into bone.

RESULTS

Four-phase insertion fibers of the tibial ACL were identified directly medial to the ALMR insertion as they attached onto the tibial plateau. The mean percentage of ACL fibers overlapping the ALMR insertion instead of inserting into subchondral bone in the coronal and sagittal planes was 41.0% ± 8.9% and 53.9% ± 4.3%, respectively. The percentage of insertion overlap in the sagittal plane was significantly higher than in the coronal plane ( P = .02).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to quantify the ACL insertion overlap of the ALMR insertion in the coronal and sagittal planes, which supplements previous literature on the insertion area overlap and iatrogenic injuries of the ALMR insertion. Future studies should determine how much damage to the ALMR insertion is acceptable to properly restore ACL function without increasing the risk for tears of the ALMR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Overlap of the insertion areas on the tibial plateau has been previously reported; however, the results of this study demonstrate significant overlap of the insertions superior to the insertion sites on the tibial plateau as well. These findings need to be considered when positioning for tibial tunnel creation in ACL reconstruction to avoid damage to the ALMR insertion.

Surgical Management and Treatment of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament/Posterolateral Corner Injured Knee

Posterolateral knee injuries occur more commonly than in the past. These injuries most commonly occur concurrent with cruciate ligament tears. The main stabilizers of the posterolateral knee are the fibular collateral ligament, the popliteus tendon, and the popliteofibular ligament. These static stabilizers function to prevent increased varus, external rotation, and coupled posterolateral rotation of the knee. The most important clinical tests to diagnose posterolateral knee injuries are the varus stress test, posterolateral drawer, and dial tests. Varus stress radiographs are key objective means to diagnose these injuries. Anatomic- based reconstructions have been validated to restore stability and improve outcomes.

Iatrogenic lateral meniscus anterior horn injury in different tibial tunnel placement techniques in ACL reconstruction surgery - A cadaveric study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of tibial tunnel positioning in single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstructions on lateral meniscus anterior root.

MATERIALS

Twelve single knee cadavers were used, 6 for a single bundle ACL reconstruction, which were reamed gradually starting from 8 mm, 9 mm and ended with a 10 mm reamers, while the other 6 were prepared for a double bundle ACL reconstruction in which 7 mm reamer for the AM tunnel and 6 mm reamer for the PL tunnel were used. After drilling, changes of lengths and thicknesses of anterior horns of the lateral menisci were recorded.

RESULTS

Before drilling, the groups were homogenous for the lateral menisci dimensions. After drilling, no statistically significant difference was noticed between the two groups. However, in single bundle group, 2 anterior horns width injury (1.44 mm and 2.13 mm) with the 9 mm reamer and 3 anterior horns width injury (2.51 mm, 3.55 mm and 4.28 mm) with the 10 mm reamer were recorded. However in double bundle group a single anterior horn width injury (2.82 mm) was recorded.

CONCLUSION

Using a greater size reamer in single bundle reconstruction, causes a relatively higher risk of lateral meniscal anterior root injury. Lateral meniscus stability should be examined arthroscopically after reaming with large reamers.

Posterior meniscal root injuries

- Meniscal root tears (MRTs) are defined as radial tears within 1 cm of the meniscal root insertion, or an avulsion of the insertion of the meniscus. These injuries change joint loading due to failure of the meniscus to convert axial loads into hoop stresses, resulting in joint overloading and degenerative changes in the knee. Meniscal root repair is recommended in patients without advanced osteoarthritis (Outerbridge 3-4), in order to restore joint congruence and loading and therefore to avoid the long-term effect of joint overloading. Several techniques have been described. Improved knee function has been reported after meniscal root repair, but there are still conflicting reports on whether surgical treatment can prevent osteoarthritis.

Posterior lateral meniscal root tear due to a malpositioned double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tibial tunnel

The posterior lateral (PL) meniscal root plays an essential role in ensuring the health of the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Injuring the PL meniscal root has been demonstrated to result in significant deleterious changes to tibiofemoral contact mechanics. Anatomic studies have reported that the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and PL root lie in close proximity on the tibial plateau. Therefore, during a double-bundle ACL reconstruction, the PL root may be inadvertently injured during the reaming of the posterior ACL double-bundle reconstruction tibial tunnel that is intended to recreate the posterolateral bundle of the ACL. This case report describes an occurrence of iatrogenic injury to the PL root due to a posteriorly malpositioned double-bundle ACL tibial tunnel. This report is the first known description of this mechanism of injury in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case report, Level IV.

Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 2: The posterior cruciate ligament

BACKGROUND

Recent emphasis has turned to reconstructing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) after injury. However, single-bundle PCL reconstruction of the anterolateral bundle may potentially injure the posterior meniscal roots.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine if posterior meniscal root injuries occurred because of tunnel reaming for single-bundle PCL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that tibial tunnel reaming within the anterolateral bundle footprint during PCL reconstruction would result in clinically significant decreases in posteromedial (PM) root attachment areas and in ultimate failure strength for the PM root.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Testing was performed on 12 matched pairs of human cadaveric knees. For each pair of knees, one knee was left intact, while the contralateral knee was prepared with a tibial tunnel placed 5 mm anterior to the center of the tibial PCL attachment and within the previously described footprint of the anterolateral bundle of the PCL for single-bundle PCL reconstruction. The attachment areas of the posterior meniscal roots were measured with a coordinate measuring device before and after PCL tunnel reaming. The posterior meniscal roots were then pulled to failure with a dynamic tensile testing machine.

RESULTS

There was a significant mean decrease in the attachment area of the PM root (%Δ, 28%; 95% CI, 16-40) after PCL tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P=.005). The mean ultimate failure strength of the native PM root (mean, 440 N; 95% CI, 347-534) was also significantly stronger (mean, 40%; 95% CI, 18-61; P=.005) than that of the PM root after PCL tunnel reaming (mean, 243 N; 95% CI, 176-309). No changes were found for the posterolateral (PL) root after PCL tunnel reaming.

CONCLUSION

Tibial tunnel reaming for single-bundle PCL reconstruction in the anterolateral bundle footprint significantly reduced the ultimate failure strength and attachment area of the PM meniscal root. The attachment area and ultimate failure strength of the PL root were unaffected by tunnel reaming.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tibial tunnels reamed in the footprint of the anterolateral bundle during single-bundle PCL reconstruction can cause iatrogenic damage to the PM meniscal root attachment. Thus, tibial tunnels should strive to be reamed in the center of the entire tibial PCL attachment site during PCL reconstruction.

Consequences of tibial tunnel reaming on the meniscal roots during cruciate ligament reconstruction in a cadaveric model, Part 1: The anterior cruciate ligament

BACKGROUND

The current standard for treating complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction, which requires reaming a tibial tunnel. Based on recent anatomic and biomechanical studies, this reconstruction tunnel may cause injuries to the anterior meniscal root attachments.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to determine if injuries occurred to the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) meniscal root attachments because of reaming a tibial reconstruction tunnel in the anatomic center of the ACL footprint. It was hypothesized that tibial tunnel reaming for ACL reconstruction would result in significant decreases in the attachment area and in ultimate failure strength for the AL root.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve matched pairs of human cadaveric knees were tested. One knee from each pair remained intact, while the contralateral knee was reamed with a tibial tunnel for an anatomic ACL reconstruction. The attachment areas of the anterior meniscal roots were measured with a coordinate measuring device before and after tunnel reaming. The anterior meniscal roots were then pulled to failure with a dynamic tensile testing machine.

RESULTS

There was a significant mean decrease in the attachment area for the AL root (%Δ, 38%; 95% CI, 25-51) after ACL tunnel reaming compared with the intact state (P=.003). The mean ultimate failure strength of the native AL root (mean, 610 N; 95% CI, 470-751) was significantly stronger (P=.015) than that of the AL root with a reamed ACL reconstruction tunnel (mean, 506 N; 95% CI, 353-659). Tunnel reaming did not significantly affect the AM root attachment area or ultimate failure strength.

CONCLUSION

Tibial tunnel reaming during anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction significantly decreased the AL meniscal root attachment area and ultimate failure strength. The AM root was not significantly affected by reaming of the ACL reconstruction tunnel. Future studies should investigate the clinical importance of these iatrogenic injuries to the AL root.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ACL reconstruction tunnels reamed in the center of the ACL tibial footprint caused a significant decrease in the attachment area and ultimate strength of the AL meniscal root attachment. Clinically, repositioning guide pins placed in the lateral aspect of the ACL attachment before tibial tunnel reaming may minimize iatrogenic injuries to the AL meniscal root attachment.