Use of the International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Association Between ACL Continuity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 5 Years After an Acute ACL Rupture and 11-Year Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis From the KANON Trial

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures can restore ACL fiber continuity. The relationship between ACL continuity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (sign of ACL healing) and outcomes >5 years after an acute ACL rupture has not been investigated.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to (1) describe clinical outcomes and radiographic osteoarthritis (ROA) at 11 years based on ACL continuity status at 5 years and (2) investigate the relationship between 5-year ACL continuity status and 11-year Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of KANON randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Overall, 105 of 121 (87%) active adults with acute ACL ruptures randomized to undergo initial exercise therapy and optional delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR) or early ACLR and postoperative exercise therapy completed 11-year follow-up. MRI scans at 5 years were evaluated using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (0-3), with grades 0 to 2 considered to represent "ACL continuity." Patient-reported outcomes (KOOS4, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Tegner Activity Scale, self-reported new knee injuries), knee laxity, and radiographic findings (tibiofemoral and/or patellofemoral ROA) were assessed at 11 years. The relationship between 5-year ACL continuity and 11-year KOOS4 scores (0-100) was examined using linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and baseline KOOS4 scores.

RESULTS

Of patients managed nonsurgically, 58% (n = 14) had ACL continuity and 42% (n = 10) had ACL discontinuity at 5 years. Analyses suggest that ACL continuity was associated with worse 11-year KOOS4 scores compared with delayed ACLR (adjusted mean difference, -20.2 [95% CI, -31.9 to -8.6]) and early ACLR (adjusted mean difference, -15.5 [95% CI, -26.4 to -4.7]) as well as similar or worse KOOS4 scores compared with ACL discontinuity (adjusted mean difference, -11.4 [95% CI, -26.5 to 3.6]). The proportion of patients with tibiofemoral ROA ranged from 14% (ACL continuity) to 23% (delayed ACLR), and the proportion of patients with patellofemoral ROA ranged from 11% (ACL discontinuity) to 41% (early ACLR).

CONCLUSION

ACL continuity on 5-year MRI may be associated with worse patient-reported outcomes at 11 years after an ACL injury compared with early or delayed ACLR.

REGISTRATION

84752559 (ISRCTN).

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Shows No Difference in Outcomes-But Faster Functional Recovery-Versus Non-augmented Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and suture tape augmentation (STA) versus ACLR without biological augmentation or STA.

METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial at a single institution to compare ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA (group A) versus ACLR without biological augmentation or STA (group NA). The study sought to include 100 patients. Skeletally mature patients younger than 25 years received quadriceps tendon autograft, whereas patients aged 25 years or older underwent allograft ACLR with an all-inside technique. Patients with concomitant meniscal pathologies were included. The primary outcomes compared were range of motion (ROM), limb symmetry, and patient-reported outcomes. Secondary outcomes included radiographic outcomes and surgical complications. Univariate and mixed-model regression analyses were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included (29 patients in group A [11 female patients, 38%] and 30 patients in group NA [15 female patients, 50%]). Early ROM at 6 weeks (125° of flexion vs 109° of flexion, P < .0001) and limb symmetry at 12 weeks (80.6% vs 36.7% [delta, 43.9%], P < .001) were significantly improved in group A. At 2 years, International Knee Documentation Committee scores were similar (91.1 ± 12.7 vs 85.3 ± 10.8, P = .109). Quality-of-life subscores of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were significantly enhanced in group A (85.2 ± 20.9 vs 72.1 ± 20.4, P = .042). In 22 patients (12 in group A and 10 in group NA), computed tomography scans were obtained at 6 months to compare bone tunnel healing. Overall, the mean increase in bone tunnel diameter was significantly smaller in group A than in group NA. No difference in graft rerupture or reoperation rate was observed. Reoperations were performed for stiffness in 7 of 59 patients (11.9%) (3 [10%] in group A vs 4 [13%] in group NA; P > .999).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in International Knee Documentation Committee scores between groups at 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes including early ROM and limb symmetry were significantly improved in patients who received ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, randomized controlled trial.

4-Strand hamstring versus single-bundle quadriceps tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Purpose

To compare the 2-year postoperative outcomes of hamstring tendon (HT) grafts to quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesised no significant differences between the two methods.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Five online databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were screened for prospective randomised controlled trials (RCT). IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, side-to-side KT-1000 scores and ages were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS v29. Between the two groups, a test of between-subgroup homogeneity p-value < 0.05 was used to assess statistical significance, while a Δ Cohen's d ≥ 0.8 was used to assess clinical significance.

Results

Five RCTs were included in the final analysis. The HT group included 87 patients, and the QT group included 93 patients. The mean ages for the HT and QT groups were 28.3 ± 6.6 and 26.5 ± 8.4 years, respectively. HTs yielded clinically higher IKDC scores (Δ Cohen's d = 2.27, p = 0.24), clinically lower side-to-side KT-1000 differences (Δ Cohen's d = 1.65, p = 0.08), and clinically and statistically higher Lysholm scores (Δ Cohen's d = 2.93, p = 0.00). However, QT yielded higher Tegner scores (Δ Cohen's d = 1.68, p = 0.00), whereas HT led to a moderate clinical reduction (Cohen's d = -0.55, p = 0.06, 95% CI [-1.11 to 0.02]).

Conclusions

Compared with the use of the QT graft, the HT graft for ACL reconstruction may result in greater knee function and stability, while QT ACL reconstruction may be associated with increased levels of postsurgical activity in terms of return to sports and work. Future long-term RCTs are needed to confirm our findings.

Level of Evidence

Level I.

Effect of Initial Graft Tension on Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes After ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With 15-Year Follow-up

Background

The graft tension applied during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation (subsequently referred to as initial graft tension) could potentiate posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) and influence other outcomes.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of initial graft tension on imaging and patient-reported outcomes related to PTOA 15 years postreconstruction surgery. Clinical and functional outcomes were also assessed. It was hypothesized that (1) the high-tension group would have improved imaging findings and outcomes compared with the low-tension group at 15-year follow-up and (2) the imaging findings and outcomes for the high-tension group would be equivalent to the sex-, race-, age-, and activity level matched control group.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

Consented patients underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-patellar tendon-bone or a 4-strand hamstring tendon autograft. A matched uninjured control group was assembled for comparison. Two laxity-based tensioning procedures were randomized: (1) tension set to restore normal anteroposterior (AP) laxity at time of surgery relative to the contralateral uninjured knee (low-tension group) or (2) tension set to overconstrain AP laxity at time of surgery relative to the contralateral knee (high-tension group). Baseline outcome measures, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were collected prior to surgery and at 15 years postoperatively.

Results

For medial joint space width, the differences between limbs across the 3 groups were not significant. Within the tension groups, the Whole Organ MRI Score was significantly higher in the surgical knee relative to the contralateral knee in both groups, while the Osteoarthritis Research Society International radiographic scores were higher in the surgical knee in the low-tension group only. A total of 43% of patients in both tension groups met the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score composite criteria for a symptomatic knee compared with controls (10%; P = .01). Most other outcomes, including AP laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee knee examination score, and single-leg hop test were not significantly different between the 3 groups.

Conclusion

The results do not support the hypotheses that patients in the high-tension group would have better chondroprotection compared with the low-tension group and have equivalent outcomes with the matched controls. Overall, the results show that patients undergoing ACLR are more likely to develop PTOA and display inferior outcomes compared with the uninjured matched control group, regardless of graft tension.

ACL plus ALL reconstruction restores normal knee stability and does not lead to lateral pain or signs of lateral overstrain

ACL rupture is a common injury in recreational and professional athletes. Most ACL tears occur in combination with an ALL lesion. Combined reconstruction of the ACL and ALL reduces re-rupture rates by up to 3.1 times compared to isolated ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons; however, it has not yet been established as the surgical standard. The purpose of this study was to investigate if patients benefit from ACL+ALL reconstruction in terms of translation and rotation stability, return to activity and return to sport, as well as to assess any potential negative effects of this technique.This is a multicentric study of retrospectively collected patients who were followed up 12.7 months postoperatively. The patient sample consisted of 55 patients (group 1: n=29, Munich/Germany, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL fixation with interference screw, and group 2: n=26, Bolzano/Italy, ACL+ALL, femoral ALL-fixation with SwiveLock). Clinical outcomes were evaluated through instrumental measurements with two different devices to assess translational anteroposterior and rotational stability and through patient-reported outcome measures (Lysholm Score, Activity Rating Scale, Tegner Score, VAS (PROMs)).A total of 55 patients (mean (± SD) age: 24.7 ± 7.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 1.5 months were included. The mean anterior translation of all operated (ACL+ALL) knees was 3.2 ± 1.1 mm and was not significantly different from the values of the non-operated knees (2.6 ± 1.0 mm). The results of the anterior drawer test in internal rotation were 3.3 ± 1.1 mm for the operated knee vs. 2.7 ± 1.0 mm for the non-operated knee (p=0.0014). There were no further significant differences between the operated and non-operated knee regarding translation or internal and external rotation. The mean value for pain on the lateral side of the knee was 1.1 ± 1.3 on the VAS 0-10 pain scale. All other PROMs showed no relevant differences between pre-injury and post-operative.ALL reconstruction restores the function of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. In this study, knee joint stability regarding anteroposterior translation and rotation showed values almost identical to those of the healthy non-operated contralateral knee. It leads to excellent patient outcomes with near pre-injury levels regarding the relevant PROMs. In particular, combined reconstruction did not result in any clinically significant negative side-effects such as pain on the ALL incision site or signs of overstrain in the lateral knee.

Anterior cruciate ligament repair using dynamic intraligamentary stabilization grants 88.5% survival at minimum follow-up of 5 years

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report on the revision rates and clinical outcomes following dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) at a minimum follow-up of 5 years and to investigate which preoperative or intraoperative characteristics could influence revision rates or clinical scores.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively assessed all 609 knees that underwent ACL repair using DIS at a single centre. At a minimum follow-up of 5 years, patients were assessed using the Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores, as well as passive flexion and extension.

RESULTS

At a follow-up of 5.1 ± 0.3 years (range, 5-10), of the 609 patients, 428 patients were available for clinical assessment. Anterior tibial translation decreased from 9.7 ± 2.1 to 7.8 ± 1.9 mm, and side-to-side difference decreased from 4.3 ± 2.3 to 1.5 ± 1.8 mm. The postoperative Lysholm score was 96.9 ± 5.6, subjective IKDC was 95.6 ± 6.1 and Tegner scores ranged from 4 to 11, of which 51% of patients had a score of 7 or more. The estimated survival rate was 86% for the first half of the cohort and increased to 91% for the second half of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

At a minimum follow-up of 5 years following ACL repair using DIS, it was found that it grants satisfactory clinical outcomes and that surgeons should inform patients who have predispositions about the higher risk of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV retrospective study.

Inconsistencies in clinically significant outcome metrics for knee cartilage repair: a systematic review

To systematically review the variability of reporting of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) including minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and threshold calculation methods following surgical treatments for cartilage defects of the knee. A systematic review was performed using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was performed on August 12th, 2024, using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus online databases for human clinical studies with publication dates ranging from 2010 to 2024 reporting on MCID, SCB, or PASS following surgical treatments for cartilage defects of the knee. Study demographics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), CSO thresholds, and methods of CSO calculation were collected. A total of 19 studies (n = 3659 patients) with an average follow-up of 36.5 months were included. A total of 14 (93.3%) studies reported MCID, six (31.8%) studies reported SCB, and five (26.3%) studies reported PASS. Of the included studies, 16 (80%) referenced another study for calculating their CSO whereas three (20%) studies calculated their own CSO. A total of 16 different PROMs were reported among the included studies. Eight studies utilized the anchor-based method for CSO calculation, ten studies used both the anchor and the distribution-based methods for calculation, while only one study used the distribution-based method alone. There is considerable variation in the reporting and calculation methods of MCID, SCB, and PASS for different PROMs following surgical treatments for cartilage defects of the knee.Level of Evidence: IV, Systematic Review of Level I-IV studies.

Anatomic Risk Factors for Initial and Secondary Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study in 880 Female Elite Handball and Soccer Players

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most severe injuries for athletes. It is important to identify risk factors because a better understanding of injury causation can help inform athletes about risk and increase their understanding of and motivation for injury prevention.

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between anatomic factors and risk for future noncontact ACL injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 870, excluding 9 players with a new contact ACL injury and a player with a new noncontact ACL injury just before the testing, female elite handball and soccer players-86 of whom had a history of ACL injury-underwent measurements of anthropometrics, alignment, joint laxity, and mobility, including leg length, knee alignment, knee anteroposterior laxity, generalized joint hypermobility, genu recurvatum, and hip anteversion. All ACL injuries among the tested players were recorded prospectively. Welch t tests and chi-square tests were used for comparison between the groups (new injury group, which sustained a new ACL injury in the follow-up period, and no new injury group).

RESULTS

An overall 64 new noncontact ACL injuries were registered. No differences were found between athletes with and without a new ACL injury among most of the measured variables. However, static knee valgus was significantly higher in the new injury group than in the no new injury group among all players (mean difference [MD], 0.9°; P = .007), and this tendency was greater in players with a previous ACL injury (MD, 2.1°; P = .002). Players with secondary injury also had a higher degree of knee hyperextension when compared with those previously injured who did not have a secondary injury (MD, 1.6°; P = .007).

CONCLUSION

The anatomic factors that we investigated had a weak or no association with risk for an index noncontact ACL injury. Increased static knee valgus was associated with an increased risk for noncontact ACL injury, in particular for secondary injury. Furthermore, hyperextension of the knee was a risk factor for secondary ACL injury.

In vivo kinematic analysis of failure cases after nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction occasionally induces ACL failure without an evident injury episode, necessitating revision surgery. Although the in vivo kinematics of ACL deficiency before primary ACL reconstruction are well documented, the kinematics of ACL failure after nonanatomical reconstruction remain unexplored. The aim of this study is to investigate ACL failure kinematics following nonanatomical reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study enrolled three patients with ACL failure after nonanatomical reconstruction, 20 normal and 16 ACL-deficient knees. The anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral femoral condyles and center of the femur and femoral rotation relative to the tibia during squatting were evaluated using a two- to three-dimensional registration technique under fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Medial AP translation of the nonanatomically reconstructed knee in one patient showed posterior location and abnormal kinematics compared with the ACL-deficient knees. In contrast, the lateral AP position of the nonanatomically reconstructed knees in two patients were more posteriorly located and showed more abnormal kinematics than the ACL-deficient knees. Central AP translation of the nonanatomically reconstructed knees in two patients was located more posteriorly throughout the range of midflexion. Femoral rotation of the nonanatomically reconstructed knees showed abnormal kinematics compared with that of the normal and ACL-deficient knees.

CONCLUSIONS

By independently assessing the medial and lateral aspects of the femur, the medial or lateral condyle of the femur of nonanatomically reconstructed knees exhibited a more pronounced abnormality compared with ACL-deficient knees. The femur of the nonanatomically reconstructed knees showed abnormal rotational kinematics. Considering the kinematic aspect, nonanatomical ACL reconstruction should be avoided.

Increased rate of surgery for loss of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (COVID-19).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary ACLR between March 2017 and November 2022 by a senior high-volume orthopaedic surgeon was performed. Exclusion criteria included revision ACLR, multiligamentous knee surgery, and age <14 years. The COVID-19 group was categorized according to the United States Centers for Disease Control Public Health Emergency declaration dates (January 31, 2020-May 11, 2023). To minimize confounding variables associated with the early stages of COVID-19, patients who underwent ACLR between December 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020 were excluded. Loss of motion was defined using the International Knee Documentation Committee criteria for loss of motion of the knee (i.e. an extension deficit >5° or flexion deficit >15° compared to the contralateral knee) 3-12 months after ACLR or as requiring surgery to restore motion within 12 months of ACLR.

RESULTS

A total of 336 individuals who underwent 352 primary ACLRs (164 pre-COVID-19, 188 during COVID-19) were included (mean age: 25.2 ​± ​10.6 years, 44% female). The overall rate of postoperative loss of motion was 15% (n = 53), and 9% (n = 31) required surgery to restore motion within 12 months of ACLR. More patients underwent surgery for loss of motion during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19, which was statistically significant (12% (n = 23) vs 5% (n = 8), respectively, P = 0.02). However, a statistically significant difference in the rate of loss of motion was not detected (18% (n = 33) vs 12% (n = 20), respectively, P = 0.16). A statistically significant increased median time from injury to ACLR was observed during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 (55 vs 37 days, P <0.01). More patients were unable to achieve terminal extension (0°) at minimum 9 months postoperatively during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 (10% vs 3%, P = 0.04) and motion was worse at this interval (0°-136° vs -2°-138°, P <0.01).

CONCLUSION

Surgery for loss of motion following ACLR was more common during COVID-19. Decreased access to elective medical care, changed activity level, psychological effects, or COVID-19 itself may explain the increased rate of surgery for loss of motion during COVID-19.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series; level IV.

Ramp lesions of the medial meniscus are associated with greater preoperative anterior knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injury

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of ramp lesions in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and to compare preoperative knee laxity between the patients with and without ramp lesions by using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS).

METHODS

Two hundred six patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction with preoperative EMS measurements were retrospectively enrolled in the present study. The diagnoses of the ramp lesions were made by arthroscopic inspections. The patients with ramp lesions and no other meniscal lesions were allocated to 'ramp group', and the patients without any meniscal lesions were allocated to 'control group'. Before ACL reconstruction under general anaesthesia, the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation (ATT) during Lachman test (mm) and tibial acceleration (m/s2) of posterior tibial reduction during the pivot-shift test was measured using the EMS. The SSD in tibial internal/external rotation angle (°) at 30, 60 and 90 were further measured using the EMS. The SSD in ATT using KT-2000 was also measured. Knee laxity measurements were compared between two groups using unpaired Student's t test.

RESULTS

Ramp lesions were observed in 30 patients (14.7%). Subsequently, 17 patients were allocated to 'ramp group' and 77 patients to 'control group', and there were no statistical differences with regard to background demographics. ATT-SSD during Lachman test was significantly greater in 'ramp group' (9.1 [95% confidence interval, CI: 5.7-12.5] mm vs. 6.2 [95% CI: 5.1-7.3] mm, p = 0.037). However, SSD in ATT with KT-2000, tibial acceleration during pivot-shift test, and SSD in tibial rotational angles were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Presence of ramp lesion was associated with increased anterior knee laxity during Lachman test, suggesting ramp lesions may need to be addressed at the time of ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Microfracture Versus a Porcine-Derived Collagen-Augmented Chondrogenesis Technique for Treating Knee Cartilage Defects: Results at Midterm Follow-up

Background

Damaged cartilage can be treated using the creation of microfractures (MFxs) or the porcine-derived collagen-augmented chondrogenesis technique (C-ACT).

Purpose

To provide the midterm results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing MFx and C-ACT for knee cartilage defects.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

The study cohort comprised 36 patients with medial femoral condyle cartilage defects who were followed up for 6 years with clinical and magnetic resonance imaging data (n = 14 treated with MFx alone, n = 22 treated with C-ACT). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 2, and 6 years postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 years postoperatively, and the repaired cartilage tissue was evaluated using the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score. The repaired tissue/reference cartilage ratio was quantified using T2 mapping. Adverse events during follow-up were also evaluated.

Results

In both groups, the VAS pain score improved and was maintained for 1, 2, and 6 years postoperatively compared with preoperatively (P < .05 for all). Although there were no significant differences between groups in the VAS pain, KOOS, or IKDC scores at any time point, the change in the IKDC-Activities of Daily Living subscore from preoperatively to 6 years postoperatively was better in the C-ACT group than the MFx group (P = .0423). At 6 years postoperatively, the MOCART assessment showed superior results regarding the surface of the repair tissue in the C-ACT group compared with the MFx group (P = .0288). There were no differences between the groups in the total MOCART score or other subscores.

Conclusion

The study results suggest that C-ACT has similar effects to MFx in improving pain, joint function, and imaging findings and may be superior to MFx in improving daily life function and improving the quality of the surface of the cartilage tissue.

Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02539030.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (SP ACL‑RSI): Measurement properties and responsiveness in a multisport sample

Purpose

The aim was to translate and adapt The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) to Spanish and provide evidence of its psychometric properties and responsiveness in a both sexes multisport sample.

Methods

ACL-RSI Spanish version (SP ACL-RSI) was obtained by forward-back-translation method. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness were assessed. Standardized response mean (SRM), smallest detectable change (SDC) and minimally important change (MIC) were obtained by anchor-based method. The sample consisted of n = 132 multisport patients who underwent ACL-RSI. Sixty-seven patients (Group A) completed test-retest of the SP ACL-RSI within 15 days and 65 patients (Group B) fulfilled SP ACL-RSI, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the International Knee Documentation Committee-Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SF 2000), the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperative, 6 and 12 months.

Results

The SP ACL-RSI shows satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92), with acceptable floor (9%) and ceiling (6%) effects. Convergent validity was supported with moderate positive correlations with KOOS and IKDC-SF 2000 dimensions, and a negative correlation with the TSK (p < 0.001). For SDC responsiveness, a high effect was observed with SRM = 0.97 at 12 months, and the MIC for SP ACL-RSI was 15.

Conclusions

The SP ACL-RSI is as valid and reliable as the original for measuring emotions, confidence in performance, and re-injury risk on return to sport after ACL-R in Spanish-speaking multisport practitioners of both sexes. Moreover, it shows acceptable responsiveness, performing better at the group level than the individual level.

Level of evidence

A cohort study (diagnosis); Level II of evidence.

Long-term Outcomes of Partial Meniscectomy for Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair is superior to debridement in terms of patient-reported outcomes, rates of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and long-term costs. Despite the known poor midterm outcomes, there is a paucity of long-term results of partial meniscectomy for degenerative MMPRTs.

Purpose

To 1) evaluate long-term patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent partial medial meniscectomy (PMM) for MMPRTs, and 2) determine the rate of and risk factors for conversion to total knee TKA.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A previously identified cohort of 26 patients treated with partial meniscectomy for isolated MMPRTs between 2005 and 2013 was prospectively followed for long-term outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients were evaluated for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) outcome score, reoperation, and conversion to TKA. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty or a severely abnormal IKDC subjective score <75.4.

Results

This study included 26 patients (10 men, 16 women; mean age, 54 ± 8.7 years [range, 38-71 years] at diagnosis; body mass index, 32.9 ± 5.5) who were followed for a mean of 14.0 ± 3.6 years (range, 10.1-19.6 years). At the final follow-up, 1 patient was deceased and 18 (72%) of the remaining 25 patients had progressed to TKA, with 1 (4%) patient undergoing repeat meniscectomy. The 6 (24%) patients who had not progressed to TKA or revision surgery reported a mean IKDC score of 57 ± 23. Nineteen patients underwent subsequent surgery and 5 demonstrated severely abnormal IKDC scores resulting in a clinical failure rate of 96% (24 of the 25 living patients) at a mean 14-year follow-up.

Conclusion

PMM for medial meniscus posterior horn root tears demonstrated 72% progression to TKA and 96% failure according to subjective clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the elderly: 5-Year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Older adults remain active for longer and continue sports and activities that require rotation on one leg later in life. The rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is therefore increasing in those over 40 years old, with an associated increase in the rate of surgical reconstruction (ACLR), but there is limited literature on its effectiveness. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of elderly patients who have undergone ACLR with those of a younger group of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent ACLR with bone-patella tendon-bone grafting (BPTB) at a level I trauma center between 2015 and 2017 were included in the study with a 5-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 4 groups: below 40 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years and over 60 years. The graft function was evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Score, the anteroposterior (AP) displacement was measured by arthrometer (KT-1000; MEDMetric) and the Lysholm scale was used for subjective evaluation.

RESULTS

195 patients were included in the final analysis. The IKDC score showed significantly poorer scores in the 50-59 years and over 60 years group than in the younger groups, however in 83 % and 66 % of cases reached normal or nearly normal grades, respectively. A significant difference was found in the knee AP displacement (measured in mm) between the below 40 years group and 50-59 years as well as over 60 years old groups; however, the number of graft failure (laxity >5 mm) and elongation (>3 mm) did not increased in these senior groups. The patient-reported Lysholm scores in the 40-49 years, 50-59 years and 60 years groups was lower than in the below 40 years group, but the average score was "good".

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term results of ACL reconstruction in older athletes are comparable to those of younger patients, both in terms of knee function and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, there is no difference in outcomes for older patients over the age of 40 compared to those in their 50 s or even 60 s. There is still insufficient published evidence to define an upper age limit for ACL reconstruction in older athletes.

Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Restoration: 6-Year Results From the First-in-Human Cohort Study

Background

Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament restoration (BEAR) combines suture repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with an extracellular matrix implant plus autologous blood to facilitate native ACL healing.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the 6-year follow-up outcomes of patients who underwent the BEAR procedure with those of a nonrandomized concurrent control group receiving autograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in the first-in-human safety study of the BEAR implant (BEAR I trial). Based on the 2-year results, it was hypothesized that isometric hamstring strength after the BEAR procedure would be greater than that after ACLR and that there would be no other differences in outcomes at 6 years.

Study Design

Cohort study, Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Ten patients underwent BEAR and 10 received ACLR with a 4-stranded hamstring autograft. Outcomes assessed included the record of subsequent surgeries, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Score, IKDC physical examination grade, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, instrumented knee laxity, functional outcomes (ie, muscle strength assessments and hop testing), and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging assessment. Comparisons between treatments were based on computations of the mean differences and the associated 95% CIs.

Results

One patient in the BEAR group and 3 patients in the ACLR group were lost to follow-up. In the period between 2 and 6 years, 1 patient in each group underwent revision surgery. There were no differences between groups at the 6-year follow-up in any of the outcome measures except for isometric hamstring strength, which was approximately equal to that of the contralateral knee in the BEAR group and <44% of that in the contralateral knee in the ACLR group (P < .01).

Conclusion

This preliminary study suggests that the outcomes of BEAR and ACLR with a hamstring tendon graft may be similar at the 6-year follow-up and warrants investigation of the BEAR procedure in a larger cohort of patients.

Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Results in Better Knee Stability and More Satisfactory Subjective Outcomes in Non-Athlete Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Consensus has not yet been reached regarding combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALLR) with revisional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients who underwent isolated RACLR and those who underwent RACLR combined with ALLR. Methods: Between June 2010 and June 2021, 49 patients who underwent RACLR were retrospectively reviewed over a 24-month follow-up. Patients were categorized into the isolated RACLR (n = 37, group 1) or combined ALLR group (n = 12, group 2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated with several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for each PROM. The side-to-side difference (SSD) of the anterior instability was measured. The pivot-shift test was performed. Results: Baseline characteristics showed no differences between the groups. PROMs showed no significant differences between the groups at the 2-year follow-up. Group 2 was superior to group 1 in the MCID achievement rate for Lysholm knee and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the proportion of IKDC grade A in SSD for anterior laxity was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (58.3% versus [vs.] 18.3%, p = 0.009), and the proportion of pivot-shift grade 0 was also higher in group 2 (66.7% vs. 27.0%, p = 0.013). The "near return to activity" rate was also higher in group 2 than in group 1 (83.3% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.043). Conclusions: Combining ALLR with RACLR in non-athletes results in a higher proportion of patients with less mechanical graft failure and satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used on Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Patient-reported knee-related rating scores and scales are widely used in reporting the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. Understanding the psychometric properties of such measures is vital to recognizing the limitations that such measures may confer. The aim of this study was to review the available evidence as to the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in ACL surgery. Eleven studies were identified, the majority being prospective cohort studies. Eight English, ACL-specific patient-reported outcome measures were identified and evaluated: Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Cincinnati score, ACL-Quality of Life (QOL) score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form (SKF), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-ACL score, and ACL-Return to Sport Injury (RSI) scale. Only the Lysholm score, ACL-QOL, IKDC SKF, and ACL-RSI were evaluated for internal consistency, having an acceptable Cronbach's α (α>0.70). Most of the scoring systems were assessed for test-retest reliability, with four of them (Lysholm score, TAS, Cincinnati score, and IKDC SKF) having acceptable intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values (ICC > 0.70). Criterion validity was assessed for most measures with a good correlation with the IKDC. Effect sizes and standardized response means were large for three instruments that measured responsiveness (Lysholm score, TAS, and Cincinnati score) and moderate for one (ACL-QOL). Evidence is stronger and more robust for the Lysholm score, TAS, ACL-QOL, and IKDC SKF. However, there is variation in their psychometric properties as well as the aspect of knee-related health they are assessing. Hence, none can be universally applicable to all patients with ACL injuries. Recognizing these parameters is vital when choosing which instrument to use in reporting the outcomes of ACL injury or ACL surgery studies.

Temporal changes in tibiofemoral relationship following anterior cruciate ligament injury: Implications for rotational dynamics and clinical outcomes

Purpose

This study aims to elucidate changes in the tibiofemoral relationship over time following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, and investigate the correlation between the tibiofemoral relationship and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Overall, 203 primary ACL reconstructions were performed using autologous hamstring grafts. Medial and lateral anterior tibial translation (ATT) in the sagittal plane and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance in the axial plane were measured using pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and post-operative computed tomography. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative values for each parameter was calculated: ΔMesdial ATT, ΔLateral ATT and ΔTT-TG distance. The correlation between each calculated value and the time elapsed since ACL injury, and the correlation between each calculated value and PROMs-evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-were assessed.

Results

Sixty-four patients were enroled. Medial ATT, lateral ATT and TT-TG distance were significantly different pre-operatively compared to post-operative values, with the tibia translating anteriorly and rotating internally relative to the femur. ΔMedial ATT, ΔLateral ATT and ΔTT-TG distance were 1.6, 8.8 and -4.8 mm, respectively. A negative correlation was observed between the ΔTT-TG distance and the time elapsed since the injury (r = -0.44, p < 0.01). No correlation was found between ΔMedial ATT and the time elapsed since the injury, nor between ΔLateral ATT and the time elapsed since the injury. Neither the ΔMedial ATT, ΔLateral ATT, nor ΔTT-TG distance correlated with the pre-operative or post-operative KOOS subscale scores.

Conclusions

The tibia underwent internal rotation relative to the femur over time following ACL injury, highlighting the importance of assessing rotational changes in ACL-injured knees.

Level of Evidence

Level Ⅲ.

Younger age, hyperextended knee, concomitant meniscectomy and large prerevision anterior tibial translation are associated with graft failure after the revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Graft failure following revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is higher than after primary ACL reconstruction. However, data regarding revision surgery is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the associated factors for failure after revision ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Fifty-four patients (mean age: 24.7 ± 10.0 years) who underwent revision ACL reconstruction at our hospital with ≥1 year follow-up were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into Group F (graft failure) and Group N (no graft failure) groups. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with graft failure. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal thresholds for differentiating between the two groups.

Results

Graft failure was observed in 7 of 54 patients (13.0%). In the univariate analysis, significant differences were observed for age at the initial surgery (Group F: 15.6 ± 1.5, Group N: 20.9 ± 8.1), age at the revision surgery (Group F: 18.0 ± 2.8, Group N: 25.7 ± 10.3), presence of hyperextended knee (Group F: 85.7%, Group N: 14.9%), concomitant meniscectomy (Group F: 42.9%, Group N: 14.9%), prerevision space for the ACL (sACL) (Group F: 7.2 ± 3.4 mm, Group N: 13.4 ± 4.7 mm) and preoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT) (Group F: 5.0 ± 1.4 mm, Group N: 2.7 ± 3.1 m). ROC analysis of preoperative sACL and preoperative ATT on one-leg standing plain radiograph showed that cutoff values of 6.9 and 4.2 mm were the optimal thresholds, respectively.

Conclusion

Younger patients with a hyperextended knee, concomitant meniscectomy, small sACL and large ATT before revision ACL reconstruction are predisposed to graft failure.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Rehabilitation Following ACL Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation in Female Gymnast: A Resident's Case Report

Introduction

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injuries continue to be a major source of morbidity in gymnastics. The gold standard is to perform an ACL Reconstruction (ACLR). However, injuries to the proximal femoral attachment of the ACL have demonstrated an ability to regenerate. An alternative surgical intervention to the ACLR in this ACL tear subgroup is an ACL repair. The purpose of this case report is to provide a rehabilitation progression for a female gymnast after an ACL repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA).

Case Description

The subject was a 16-year-old female who presented with a Sherman Type 1 proximal avulsion of her ACL. She underwent an ACL repair with IBLA. Physical therapy interventions followed a sequential and multi-phased approach based on time for tissue physiologic healing and individual progression. Patient reported outcomes including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) were assessed in conjunction with isokinetic strength and hop performance testing to determine return to sport readiness.

Outcomes

The subject completed 42 sessions over the course of 26 weeks in addition to a home exercise program. At return to sport, clinically meaningful improvement was observed in patient reported outcomes including the IKDC, ACL-RSI, and OSPRO-YF. Additionally, strength and hop performance surpassed established thresholds of clinical significance. The subject returned to sport at six months post-operatively.

Conclusion

The subject in this case report returned to full participation in gymnastics six months after an ACL repair with internal bracing following a sequential and multi-phased rehabilitation. The primary ACL repair with IBLA appeared beneficial to this patient and could benefit from additional study in other athletes and athletic populations.

Level of Evidence

Level 5.

Modified Implant Fixation Technique Is an Alternative for Patients with an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Limited Resource Settings: A Comparison Functional Outcome Study with Polyether Ether Ketone and Bioabsorbable Screws

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most prevalent factors contributing to knee instability worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate modified metal fixation techniques for ACL reconstruction compared to factory-made implants, such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) screws, bioabsorbable screws, and modified metal implants. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted to assess the functional outcomes of ACL using various fixation methods. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction at several healthcare facilities were included in the study. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score questionnaire at 6- and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analyses, including the Shapiro-Wilk test and analysis of variance, were performed to compare outcomes among the fixation groups. Results: Thirty-three patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery with varying distributions across the three fixation groups (modified metal implants, PEEK screws, and bioabsorbable screws) were included in the study. As measured by the Lysholm and IKDC scores at 6- and 12 months post-surgery, the PEEK group demonstrated the highest average scores. Nevertheless, these functional outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.140, 0.770, 0.150, and 0.200). These findings align with those of meta-analyses comparing different fixation methods for ACL reconstruction. Conclusions: While acknowledging the small sample size as a limitation, this study suggests that modified metal implants represent viable options for ACL reconstruction. The selection of fixation methods should consider patient characteristics and preferences, emphasizing biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore their biomechanical properties and cost-effectiveness.

Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been considered a promising treatment for musculoskeletal disorders. The effects of PRP on clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are controversial.

Objective

To compare subjective outcomes and graft maturity in patients undergoing ACLR with and without postoperative intra-articular PRP injection.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This surgeon- and investigator-masked randomized clinical trial included patients treated at a national medical center in China who were aged 16 to 45 years and scheduled to undergo ACLR. Participants were enrolled between March 21, 2021, and August 18, 2022, and followed up for 12 months, with the last participant completing follow-up on August 28, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized 1:1 to the PRP group (n = 60), which received 3 doses of postoperative intra-articular PRP injection at monthly intervals, or to the control group (n = 60), which did not receive postoperative PRP injection. Both groups had the same follow-up schedule.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the mean score for 4 subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) (range, 0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function and fewer symptoms) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes, graft maturity (on magnetic resonance imaging), and physical examinations at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

Among the 120 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 29.0 [8.0] years; 84 males [70%]), 114 (95%) were available for the primary outcome analysis. The mean KOOS4 scores at 12 months were 78.3 (SD, 12.0; 95% CI, 75.2-81.4) in the PRP group and 76.8 (SD, 11.9; 95% CI, 73.7-79.9) in the control group (adjusted mean between-group difference, 2.0; 95% CI, -2.3 to 6.3; P = .36). Secondary outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups except for sports and recreation level and graft maturity at 6 months. Intervention-related adverse events included pain at the injection site and knee swelling after injection.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial among patients undergoing ACLR, the addition of postoperative intra-articular PRP injection did not result in superior improvement of knee symptoms and function at 12 months compared with no postoperative injection. Further studies are required to determine appropriate indications for PRP in musculoskeletal disorders.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000040262.

Outcomes of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair for Proximal Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study is to compare failure rates among different techniques of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair for the treatment of proximal ACL ruptures. Meta-analysis and systematic review were completed, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed published between June 2011 and June 2022 reporting outcomes of primary ACL repair on proximal tears with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. Primary ACL repair was divided into dynamic, static, and non-augmented repair. The primary outcome was failure rates, and the secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and anterior tibial stability (ATT). Eighteen studies on primary ACL repair were included, with a total of 614 patients (ages ranging from 6 to 65, 60% male). Only two studies were level 1 randomized controlled clinical trials. The static repair had a failure rate of 33 out of 261 (12.6%), non-augmented was 17 out of 179 (9.4%), and dynamic repair was 31 out of 174 (17.8%); no statistically significant difference was found comparing the failure rates (p = 0.090). PROs using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores had weighted averages of 91.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 89.6-93.8) and 94.7 (95% CI: 92.7-96.7), respectively. ATT had a weighted average of 1.668 mm (95% CI: 1.002-2.334). The primary findings of this paper include a 12.6% combined failure rate for primary proximal ACL repair with no significant difference in failure rate or PROs when accounting for the methodology of repair at a minimum two-year follow-up. It is important to note the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials, the heterogeneity of included studies, and the lack of long-term data. Despite these limitations, the findings of the current analysis suggest that primary repair may be a useful treatment option for indicated candidates with proximal ACL ruptures. Further long-term and higher-quality comparative studies on ACL reconstruction are warranted.

Association Between MRI Signal Intensity of the Repaired Lateral Meniscus and Residual Anterolateral Knee Laxity After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Anterolateral knee laxity (ALLx) has been linked to tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

Purpose

To investigate the longitudinal relationship between the signal intensity (SI) of the repaired LM on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and residual ALLx after ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 87 patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR and lateral meniscal repair (mean age, 23.5 years; body mass index, 23.7 kg/m2; 56 women) at a single institution between 2010 and 2019. Proton density-weighted (PDW) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the SI ratio (SIR) was calculated as (SI of the repaired LM)/(SI of the posterior cruciate ligament). At the 12-month follow-up, ALLx was evaluated using the pivot-shift test; an International Knee Documentation Committee grade ≥1 indicated residual ALLx.

Results

Overall, 12 patients (13.8%) exhibited ALLx at 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, the SIR on PDW images (SIR-PDW) was significantly higher in patients with ALLx versus those without ALLx (1.98 ± 0.77 vs 1.49 ± 0.52, respectively; P = .007); there was no difference in the SIR on T2W images between the groups. SIR-PDW at 3 months postoperatively was correlated negatively with patient age (r = -0.308, P = .004). When patients were stratified into a younger (≤22 years; n = 53; ALLx = 7 [13.2%]) and an older (>22 years; n = 34; ALLx = 5 [14.7%]) group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for SIR-PDW in the younger group were statistically significant for predicting the prevalence of ALLx at all follow-up times (AUCs, 0.733-0.788) with optimal cutoff values of 2.00 at 3 months, 1.50 at 6 months, and 1.50 at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis revealed that if younger patients consistently had higher SIR-PDW values than the cutoff values, they were more likely to have residual ALLx (odds ratios, 10.24-23.57).

Conclusion

For younger patients who underwent both ACLR and lateral meniscal repair, higher MRI SI of the repaired LM was associated with a higher prevalence of residual ALLx.

Injuries to both anterolateral ligament and Kaplan fiber of the iliotibial band do not increase preoperative pivot-shift phenomenon in ACL injury

Background

To assess the incidence of anterolateral ligament (ALL) and Kaplan fiber of the iliotibial band (KF) injuries in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to investigate the association between these injuries and the magnitude of preoperative pivot-shift test.

Method

One-hundred and five patients with primary ACL injury were retrospectively reviewed. ALL injury and KF injury were assessed by preoperative MRI, and subjects were allocated into four groups: Group A, neither injury; Group B, only ALL injury; Group C, only KF injury; Group D, simultaneous ALL and KF injuries. Before ACL reconstruction, tibial acceleration during the pivot-shift test was measured by an electromagnetic measurement system, and manual grading was recorded according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) guideline.

Results

In MRI, the ALL was identified in 104 patients (99.1%) and KF in 99 patients (94.3%). ALL and KF injuries were observed in 43 patients (43.9%) and 23 patients (23.5%), respectively. Patient distribution to each group was as follows; Group A: 43 patients (43.9%), Group B: 32 patients (32.7%), Group C: 12 patients (12.2%), Group D: 11 patients (11.2%). No significant differences were observed in tibial acceleration, and manual grading among the four groups.

Conclusion

Simultaneous injury to both ALL and KF was uncommon, and preoperative pivot-shift phenomenon did not increase even in those patients. The finding suggests that the role of ALL and KF in controlling anterolateral rotatory knee laxity may be less evident in the clinical setting compared to a biomechanical test setting.

Outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in an all-female soccer player cohort with mean 4.8-year follow up

OBJECTIVE

The purpose is to compare functional outcomes, return to soccer rates, and revision rates in an all-female soccer player cohort undergoing quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACLR versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft ACLR.

METHODS

Female soccer players who sustained an ACL rupture and underwent primary anatomic, single-bundle ACLR with BPTB autograft or QT autograft were included. Demographic and surgical characteristics were collected. Outcomes of interest included Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Marx score, return to soccer rates, and failure rates.

RESULTS

Data on 23 patients undergoing BPTB autograft ACLR and 14 undergoing QT autograft ACLR was available. Average age was 18.7 years, and average follow up was 4.8 years. Overall, 76 ​% (28/37) returned to soccer and 5.4 ​% (2/37) underwent revision ACLR. No major significant differences were found in demographic or surgical characteristics. No differences were found in postoperative IKDC scores, preoperative, postoperative, or change from pre-to postoperative Marx activity scores, or pre-and postoperative Tegner scores between the groups. QT autograft ACLR patients had significantly less change in Tegner scores pre-to postoperatively compared to the BTPB autograft ACLR group (0.6 ​± ​1.2 versus 2.1 ​± ​1.8; p ​= ​0.02). Both groups had similar rates of return to soccer [78 ​% (18/23) BPTB autograft ACLR versus 71 ​% (10/14) QT autograft ACLR; p ​= ​0.64] and rates of revision (8.7 % (2/23) BPTB autograft ACLR; 0 % (0/14) QT autograft ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study suggest that BPTB autograft ACLR and QT autograft ACLR produce comparable, successful functional and return to soccer outcomes in this all-female soccer player cohort study. Larger, prospective studies are needed to improve the strength of conclusions and provide more information on the optimal graft choice for female soccer players. Surgeons can use the results of this study to counsel female soccer players on expected outcomes after ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Must a Knee with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency and High-grade Pivot Shift Test Present an Increase in Internal Rotation?

Objective:  Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injuries in athletes and is often associated with damage to anterolateral structures. This combination of injuries presents itself clinically as a high-grade pivot shift test. The hypothesis of this study is that patients with ACL deficiency and high-grade pivot shift test should have an increased internal knee rotation. Methods:  Twenty-two patients were tested. After effective spinal anesthesia, two tests were performed with the patient in supine position. First, the bilateral pivot shift test was performed manually, and its grade was recorded. Then, with the knee flexed to 90 degrees, the examiner drew the projection of the foot in a neutral position and in maximum internal rotation, and the angle of internal rotation was measured from the axes built between the central point of the heel and the hallux. Results:  In the ACL-deficient knee, it was observed that there is a statistically significant average internal rotation (IR) delta of 10.5 degrees between the groups when not adjusted for age, and 10.6 degrees when adjusted for age. Conclusions:  Knees with ACL deficiency and with pivot shift test grade I do not show increased internal rotation in relation to knees with intact ACL. Knees with ACL deficiency and with pivot shift test grades II and III show increased internal rotation in comparison to healthy knees.

Nonoperative Management, Repair, or Reconstruction of the Medial Collateral Ligament in Combined Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries-Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the medial collateral ligament (MCL) is a common injury pattern and accounts for 20% of all ligamentous knee injuries. Despite advancements in surgical technique, there is no up-to-date consensus regarding the superiority of nonoperative versus operative management in higher-grade MCL tears of combined ACL-MCL injuries.

PURPOSE

To interpret recent literature on treatment options and to provide an updated evidence-based approach for management of combined ACL-MCL knee injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on outcomes following treatment of concomitant ACL and MCL injuries. A computerized search was conducted in PubMed, Embase.com, and Scopus.com. Authors independently assessed eligible studies and screened titles and abstracts. Articles reporting on patients with concomitant ACL and MCL injuries with or without concomitant procedures were included. Data regarding study design, sample size, patient age and sex, length of follow-up, timing of surgery, indications, surgical methods, concomitant procedures, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and functional outcomes, including Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and range of motion, were estimated via meta-analysis and compared statistically by surgical approach.

RESULTS

In total, 18 studies were included in the systematic review with level 1 to level 4 evidence, with a total of 1,534 cases, were included in the systematic review. Of these, 16 studies with sufficient statistical reporting including 997 cases with sufficient follow-up were included in meta-analysis. Three different approaches to combined ACL-MCL injuries were identified: ACL reconstruction with (1) nonoperative MCL, (2) MCL repair, and (3) MCL reconstruction. There was no statistical difference between nonoperative versus surgically managed MCL injuries for PROs, range of motion at final follow up, or quadriceps strength.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of combined injury in a delayed fashion facilitates return of range of motion and may allow time for low-grade MCL tears to heal. If residual valgus or anteromedial rotatory laxity remains after a period of rehabilitation, then concomitant surgical management of ACL and MCL injuries is warranted. Avulsion MCL injuries and Stener-type lesions may benefit from early repair techniques.

Satisfactory outcomes after one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using rectangular tunnel technique

PURPOSE

One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with the anatomic rectangular tunnel (RT) technique using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) grafts results in anatomically precise tunnel placement and secure graft fixation. This study evaluated knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes in terms of femoral tunnel overlap. It was hypothesised that there would be no significant differences in knee joint laxity or clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2021, a single surgeon conducted 196 one-stage revision ACLRs with the RT technique using BTB grafts. Patients were divided based on the presence of femoral tunnel overlap. Knee joint laxity was evaluated using the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and side-to-side difference measured with a KT-1000 arthrometer. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form 2000. Knee joint laxity and clinical outcomes were compared between groups after a median follow-up of 2.5 years (range 2.0-8.0).

RESULTS

The study included 30 and 73 patients in the overlap and non-overlap groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the results of the Lachman test, pivot shift test, or KT-1000 arthrometer as well as in the Lysholm, KOOS, or IKDC scores between the two groups. Based on the IKDC scores, all patients were graded as normal or nearly normal.

CONCLUSION

One-stage revision ACLR with the RT technique using BTB grafts improved knee joint laxity and had favourable clinical outcomes regardless of femoral tunnel overlap. To achieve optimal results in one-stage revision ACLR, it is crucial to create a tunnel within the anatomical attachment area and ensure proper graft fixation and tensioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Risk Factors and Preventive Strategies of Poor Knee Functions and Osteoarthritis after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Narrative Review

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is the standard surgical treatment for ACL injury, which typically uses a graft to replace the torn ligament in the knee that uses small incisions with minimally invasive surgery. The optimal knee functions following ACLR depend on rehabilitation processes before and after the surgery. Knee function is the ability of the knee to perform various types of functional movements like walking, squatting, running, jumping, and pivoting where patients expect to achieve maximum knee function or at least more than 80% of its initial condition before the injury to avoid being categorized as poor knee function after ACLR. Patients use patient-reported outcome measures to collect data on their health status and quality of life after ACLR. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) is a type of OA that manifests in local cartilage injury caused by chondrocyte death, and matrix dispersion occurs following a joint injury like ACL injury. Gender, time from injury to surgery, and graft type were considered as risk factors for poor knee function after ACLR, while overweight, meniscus tear, and cartilage defect as risk factors for PTOA. However, age is an internal risk factor for both poor knee function and PTOA following ACLR. This review suggests several strategies to prevent both conditions, including a pre-operative program, comprehensive rehabilitation, body weight control, and return to sport (RTS) consideration based on physical capacity, proper time, and psychological readiness.

Older age and the presence of intrameniscal signs are risk factors for nonsurgical treatment failure of symptomatic intact discoid lateral meniscus

PURPOSE

The treatment for symptomatic intact discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is controversial and the long-term clinical outcome remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the overall failure rate of nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic intact DLM and identify the risk factors for nonoperative management failure.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic intact DLM at our hospital from 2014 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into Group A (failure group) and Group B (nonfailure group) based on overall failure criteria: conversion to surgery, progression of a tear on MRI re-examination, or severely abnormal International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. Statistical analyses between the two groups were performed for demographic and radiographic characteristics. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors associated with worse outcomes.

RESULTS

One-hundred and four knees in 96 patients were included in this study. After a mean follow-up of 76.9 ± 11.1 months, 25 knees (24.0%) met the overall failure criteria. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that age and the presence of intrameniscus signals increased the risk of nonoperative management failure. The clinical criterion of age > 37.5 years combined with the imaging criterion of the presence of intrameniscal signals predicted conservative treatment failure of symptomatic intact DLM with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.91.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-five (24.0%) knees that underwent nonsurgical treatment met the overall failure criteria after a mean follow-up of 76.9 months. With increased age and the presence of intrameniscal signals, the nonoperative results become worse.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Concomitant Lateral Meniscus Tear is Associated with Residual Rotatory Knee Instability 1 Year after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Case-cohort Study

Lateral meniscus tear (LMT) accompanied by anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries has been reported to provoke rotatory instability of the affected knee joint. Unfortunately, these previous papers did not determine whether LMT-derived rotatory knee instability is residual because only preoperative or time zero data exists. This study aimed to longitudinally investigate how the prevalence of comorbid LMT is associated with residual rotatory knee instability (RKI) 1 year after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). A total of 327 patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR (average age: 23.4 years, body mass index: 23.5 kg/m2, 215 females). The patients were divided into three groups based on arthroscopy: 1) intact lateral meniscus (LM); 2) unrepaired LMT; 3) repaired LMT. At the 1-year follow-up, the pivot-shift test was performed. The prevalence of RKI, determined according to IKDC grades (grade ≥1 denoted RKI), was compared with chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Thirty-eight patients (11.6%) had RKI; 203 subjects (62.1%) showed LMT, and 124 patients were diagnosed with an intact LM. Out of the 203 patients, 79 (38.9%) underwent LM repair. RKI was more prevalent in the LMT group than in the intact group (13.8% versus 8.1%, p = 0.117; Odds ratio: 1.499 [95%CI: 0.864 - 2.600]). In addition, the prevalence of RKI was significantly higher in the LM-repair group than in the intact-LM group (17.7% versus 8.1%, p = 0.038; Odds Ratio: 2.455 [95%CI: 1.032 - 5.842]). Medial meniscus tear (MMT) was detected in 113 patients (34.6%); RKI prevalence was not statistically different between the intact-MM group and the MMT group (12.2% versus 10.6%, p = 0.681). The current cohort study clarified that LMT comorbid with ACL injury was longitudinally associated with increased RKI prevalence 1 year after ACLR. Therefore, patients who underwent both ACLR and LM repair demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of residual RKI.

Comparison between the effect of immersive virtual reality training versus conventional rehabilitation on limb loading and functional outcomes in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL) commonly occurs during sporting events. It causes pain, instability and reduction in range of movement of the knee which results in altered balance, reduced strength as well as loading to the involved knee. The challenge to get the patient back to competitive sports level much depends on the rehabilitation process. Post ACLR rehabilitation is challenging due to the long rehabilitation time as well as boring repetitive exercises. The aim of this study is to compare between the effectiveness of using immersive virtual reality (PlayStation VR) in addition to the conventional rehabilitation as an aid in rehabilitation of patients after ACLR in terms of objective functional assessment and pain and subjective knee function scoring.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial was undertaken in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from July 2019 until July 2020. Thirty patients were randomised into a group undergoing purely conventional rehabilitation (Group 1) and a group undergoing both conventional rehabilitation and immersive virtual reality assisted rehabilitation (Group 2). The immersive virtual reality assisted rehabilitation was started at 3 months post operatively for 3 months duration. Limb loading, balance, range of motion, functional hop tests of the knee, pain and subjective scoring of the knee with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Scores were measured preoperatively and at 6 months.

Results

There were significant differences in terms of improvement of pain scores (p = 0.012) as well as IKDC Scores (p = 0.024) in Group 2 as compared to Group 1. However, there were no significant differences with regards to limb loading, balance, range of motion and functional hop tests of the knee (p > 0.05). No adverse events were observed during the study period.

Conclusion

Immersive virtual reality can be used as an adjunct in rehabilitation of patients after ACL reconstruction in terms of improving their pain as well as their subjective knee evaluation. Large randomised control trial is recommended to further investigate the efficacy.

Nonoperative Management of Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: Poor Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) cause pain and dysfunction and are associated with poor clinical outcomes with nonoperative management at short-term follow-up. However, little is known about the long-term natural history of these tears.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to (1) provide an update to a previous minimum 2-year study on the natural progression of these tears and (2) evaluate long-term patient-reported and radiographic outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series (prognosis); Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on a cohort of patients with untreated MMPRTs, diagnosed between 2005 and 2013, who were followed clinically using International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), visual analog scale for pain, and Tegner activity scores as well as radiographically at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty or a severely abnormal subjective IKDC score <75.4.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 (10%) of the original 52 patients with minimum 2-year outcomes were subsequently lost to follow-up. The remaining 47 patients (21 male, 26 female) were followed for a mean of 14 ± 2 years (range, 11-18 years). At final follow-up, 25 patients (53%) had progressed to total knee arthroplasty, 8 (17%) were deceased, and 14 (30%) had not progressed to total knee arthroplasty. The mean IKDC and Tegner activity scores for the 14 patients with remaining MMPRTs were 51.6 ± 22.2 and 3.1 ± 1.1, respectively, and the mean visual analog scale score was 4.4 ± 3.0. Radiographically, the mean Kellgren-Lawrence grade progressed from 1.2 ± 0.7 at baseline to 2.6 ± 0.5 at final follow-up (P < .001). At a minimum 10-year follow-up, 37 of 39 living patients (95%) had failed nonoperative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Poor clinical and radiographic outcomes were associated with the nonoperative treatment of degenerative MMPRTs at long-term follow-up. This study provides a valuable update on the natural history and long-term prognosis of nonoperatively treated MMPRTs.

Nonoperative Treatment for Traumatic Partial Graft Rupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

Background

There are no studies on the nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates between nonoperative treatment and revision ACL reconstruction for traumatic partial ACL graft rupture. We hypothesized that the outcomes and failure rates would be comparable and that nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial ACL graft rupture can produce satisfactory outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 2114 patients treated for isolated ACL rupture between January 2000 and June 2020. Patients with traumatic partial graft rupture after ACL reconstruction with minimum 2-year follow-up data were included. Patients who met all the following conditions were candidates for nonoperative treatment: (1) Lachman or pivot-shift grade 0 or 1 at 6 months after ACL reconstruction, (2) ACL graft with low to intermediate signal intensity on 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (3) MRI after reinjury showing definite evidence of trauma, some fibers remaining in continuity of the ACL graft, and no anterior tibial subluxation in the sagittal plane. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment method: nonoperative treatment (group A) and revision ACL reconstruction (group B). Clinical scores, laxity test results, radiological outcomes, and graft failures were compared between the groups.

Results

In total, 47 patients had traumatic partial graft rupture (group A, n = 10; group B, n = 37). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of clinical scores, laxity tests, radiological outcomes, or graft failure.

Conclusion

The clinical and radiological outcomes of nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial graft rupture after ACL reconstruction were comparable with those of revision ACL reconstruction. Nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial ACL graft rupture can produce satisfactory outcomes in selected patients.

Arabic Translation of the Knee Outcome Survey-Sports Activities Scale With Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation

Background

There are few sports-specific knee functional scales in the Arabic language. The Knee Outcome Survey-Sports Activities Scale (KOS-SAS) is a validated sports-specific patient-reported outcome measure that assesses knee function in an athletic population.

Purpose

To provide a validated Arabic version of the KOS-SAS (KOS-SAS-Ar) while achieving cross-cultural adaptation for use in an Arabic-speaking population with sports-related knee disorders.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

There were 2 independent translators who conducted a forward translation of the KOS-SAS, followed by a backward translation by different translators. Subsequently, researchers and expert invitees judged the conceptual content and cultural adaptations of the final translation. A total of 276 patients completed the KOS-SAS-Ar as well as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective assessment of knee function and a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Statistical analysis was performed for test-retest reliability, convergent validity, construct validity, and factor analysis.

Results

The test-retest reliability of the KOS-SAS-Ar was high (r = 0.9). The items of the KOS-SAS-Ar had statistically significant internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of .924 (P < .0001). The KOS-SAS-Ar Symptoms subscore correlated with the VAS pain score (P < .0001), and the KOS-SAS-Ar Functional Limitations subscore correlated with the IKDC subjective score (P < .0001). The construct validity of the KOS-SAS-Ar was satisfactory (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value = 0.868; Bartlett test: P < .0001). Factor analysis showed a statistical correlation among the 11 items of the KOS-SAS-Ar.

Conclusion

The KOS-SAS-Ar demonstrated favorable reliability and validity, and it appears to be a suitable tool for Arabic-speaking patients with sports-related knee conditions.

Lower Patellofemoral Joint Contact Force During Side-Step Cutting After Return-to-Sports Clearance Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Low patellofemoral joint (PFJ) contact force has been associated with PFJ osteoarthritis. Quadriceps force and knee flexion angles, which are typically altered after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), primarily influence PFJ contact forces. It is still inconclusive whether differences in PFJ contact forces are present during high knee flexion tasks such as side-step cutting after clearance to return to sports (RTS) after ACLR.

PURPOSE

To explore PFJ contact forces in the ACLR limb and compare them with those of the contralateral and control limbs during side-step cutting tasks after clearance to RTS.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 26 male athletes with ACLR who were previously cleared to RTS were matched with 23 healthy men serving as the control group. Three-dimensional motion capture and force plate data were collected while both groups performed anticipated side-step cutting tasks. Joint kinematics, kinetics, muscle forces, and PFJ contact forces were calculated using musculoskeletal modeling.

RESULTS

Peak PFJ force was lower in the ACLR limbs compared with the contralateral limbs (mean difference [MD], 5.89 body weight [BW]; 95% CI, 4.7-7.1 BW; P < .001) and the control limbs (MD, 4.44 BW; 95% CI, 2.1-6.8 BW; P < .001). During peak PFJ force, knee flexion angle was lower in ACLR limbs compared with the contralateral (MD, 4.88°; 95% CI, 3.0°-6.7°; P < .001) and control (MD, 6.01°; 95% CI, 2.0°-10.0°; P < .002) limbs. A lower quadriceps force compared with the contralateral (MD, 4.14 BW; 95% CI, 3.4-4.9 BW; P < .001) and control (MD, 2.83 BW; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3 BW; P < .001) limbs was also found.

CONCLUSION

Lower PFJ contact forces and a combination of quadriceps force deficits and smaller knee flexion angle were found in the ACLR compared with the contralateral and control limbs even after clearance to RTS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Despite rehabilitation and subsequent clearance to RTS, differences in PFJ contact forces are present after ACLR. Current rehabilitation and RTS battery may not be effective and sensitive enough to identify and address these differences.

Early MRI-based quantitative outcomes are associated with a positive functional performance trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-ACL surgery

PURPOSE

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) has been used to determine the failure properties of ACL grafts and native ACL repairs and/or restorations. How these properties relate to future clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes remain unknown. The study objective was to investigate the relationship between non-contemporaneous qMRI measures and traditional outcome measures following Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR). It was hypothesized that qMRI parameters at 6 months would be associated with clinical, functional, and/or patient-reported outcomes at 6 months, 24 months, and changes from 6 to 24 months post-surgery.

METHODS

Data of BEAR patients (n = 65) from a randomized control trial of BEAR versus ACL reconstruction (BEAR II Trial; NCT02664545) were utilized retrospectively for the present analysis. Images were acquired using the Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) sequence at 6 months post-surgery. Single-leg hop test ratios, arthrometric knee laxity values, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores were determined at 6 and 24 months post-surgery. The associations between traditional outcomes and MRI measures of normalized signal intensity, mean cross-sectional area (CSA), volume, and estimated failure load of the healing ACL were evaluated based on bivariate correlations and multivariable regression analyses, which considered the potential effects of age, sex, and body mass index.

RESULTS

CSA (r = 0.44, p = 0.01), volume (r = 0.44, p = 0.01), and estimated failure load (r = 0.48, p = 0.01) at 6 months were predictive of the change in single-leg hop ratio from 6 to 24 months in bivariate analysis. CSA (βstandardized = 0.42, p = 0.01), volume (βstandardized = 0.42, p = 0.01), and estimated failure load (βstandardized = 0.48, p = 0.01) remained significant predictors when considering the demographic variables. No significant associations were observed between MRI variables and either knee laxity or IKDC when adjusting for demographic variables. Signal intensity was also not significant at any timepoint.

CONCLUSION

The qMRI-based measures of CSA, volume, and estimated failure load were predictive of a positive functional outcome trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-surgery. These variables measured using qMRI at 6 months post-surgery could serve as prospective markers of the functional outcome trajectory from 6 to 24 months post-surgery, aiding in rehabilitation programming and return-to-sport decisions to improve surgical outcomes and reduce the risk of reinjury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Patients with meniscus posterolateral root tears repair during ACL reconstruction achieve comparable post-operative outcome than patients with isolated ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Lateral posterior meniscal root tear (LPMRT) repair, at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are increasingly being performed. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes, as well as the complication rates at a minimum of 2 years follow-up, between an isolated ACL reconstruction group with intact menisci and a combined ACL reconstruction and LPMRT repair group.

METHODS

All patients who underwent combined ACL reconstruction and LPMRT repair between 2016 and 2020 were included in the study. They were matched with an isolated ACL reconstruction group with intact menisci based on age, gender and the pre-injury IKDC score. The KOOS, ACLRSI Tegner-Lysholm score and the TELOS-test were collected pre- and postoperatively; complications (re-rupture, recurrence or persistence of a high grade pivot shift, new meniscal injury) were recorded. All LPMRTs were repaired using transtibial pull-out technique.

RESULTS

After matching, 100 patients were included in this study (mean age 29.6 ± 1.0 years and mean follow-up 42.9 ± 7.3 months): 50 patients in the isolated ACL reconstruction group with intact menisci (group A) and 50 in the combined ACL reconstruction and LPMRT repair group (group B). Preoperatively, patients in group B had significant lower KOOS scores (Global 55.9 ± 2.9 vs. 64.6 ± 2.3, p = 0.02), but similar ACLRSI, TEGNER and TELOS scores. At the last follow-up, all functional scores had improved, and no significant difference between the two groups on any score was observed. There was also no difference in terms of complications rates.

CONCLUSION

At a minimum of 2 years follow-up (mean follow-up 42.9 months), LPMRT repair during ACL reconstruction has no significant difference in terms of post-operative functional outcomes compared to the isolated ACL reconstruction group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Midterm outcomes of 18 patients with primary intra-articular diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) of the knee treated with complete arthroscopic synovectomy and postoperative low-dose radiotherapy at a mean follow-up of 68 months

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of the treatment of complete arthroscopic synovectomy combined with low-dose external radiotherapy in the knee affected by primary intra-articular diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT).

METHODS

From May 2009 to January 2016, 18 patients with intra-articular diffuse TGCT underwent complete arthroscopic synovectomy and low-dose external-beam radiotherapy in Zhongnan Hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. The preoperative symptoms of patients, the complications during or after the arthroscopic procedure and the recurrence were collected and recorded. Each patient was evaluated before treatment and at the follow-up visit. Efficacy evaluation criteria were based on Ogilvie-Harris score, and the evaluation of the functional ability of knee was based on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score.

RESULTS

The mean time from symptom onset to surgery was 9.1 ± 5.8 months (range from 3 to 29 months). The most frequent preoperative symptoms were joint effusion (100%), diffuse non-specific knee pain (66.7%), and a decreased range of motion (83.3%). Mean follow-up time was 68.0 ± 18.1 months (range from 35 to 120 months). The mean evaluation score according to the Ogilvie-Harris criteria before treatment was 3.19 ± 0.74, which corresponded to a rating of "poor". The mean score after treatment was 8.79 ± 1.57, rated as "good". The Ogilvie-Harris score was significantly increased after treatment (P = 0.003). The IKDC score of all patients increased significantly from 37.1 ± 3.8 before treatment to 83.9 ± 11.3 after treatment. The IKDC score was obviously increased after treatment (P = 0.001). No recurrence was noted at final follow-up. There were no complications during or after the arthroscopic procedure.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of this study proved that complete arthroscopic synovectomy combined with low-dose external radiotherapy was appropriate for treating primary intra-articular diffuse TGCT of the knee joint. It could be safely and reliably used with minimal complications, fast postoperative recovery and satisfactory control of recurrence rates.

Infrared Thermography in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Joint Temperature Differs Based on Patient and Pain Characteristics

The aim of this study was to evaluate osteoarthritis (OA) patients with infrared thermography to investigate imaging patterns as well as demographic and clinical characteristics that influence knee inflammation. Forty patients with one-sided symptomatic knee OA were included and evaluated through knee-specific PROMs and the PainDETECT Questionnaire for neuropathic pain evaluation. Thermograms were captured using a thermographic camera FLIR-T1020 and temperatures were extracted using the software ResearchIR for the overall knee and the five ROIs: medial, lateral, medial patella, lateral patella, and suprapatellar. The mean temperature of the total knee was 31.9 ± 1.6 °C. It negatively correlated with age (rho = −0.380, p = 0.016) and positively correlated with BMI (rho = 0.421, p = 0.007) and the IKDC objective score (tau = 0.294, p = 0.016). Men had higher temperatures in the knee medial, lateral, and suprapatellar areas (p = 0.017, p = 0.019, p = 0.025, respectively). Patients with neuropathic pain had a lower temperature of the medial knee area (31.5 ± 1.0 vs. 32.3 ± 1.1, p = 0.042), with the total knee negatively correlating with PainDETECT (p = 0.045). This study demonstrated that the skin temperature of OA symptomatic knees is influenced by demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, with higher joint temperatures in younger male patients with higher BMI and worst objective knee scores and lower temperatures in patients affected by neuropathic pain.

Quantitative MRI Biomarkers to Predict Risk of Reinjury Within 2 Years After Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration

BACKGROUND

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) methods were developed to establish the integrity of healing anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs) and grafts. Whether qMRI variables predict risk of reinjury is unknown.

PURPOSE

To determine if qMRI measures at 6 to 9 months after bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) can predict the risk of revision surgery within 2 years of the index procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Originally, 124 patients underwent ACL restoration as part of the BEAR I, BEAR II, and BEAR III prospective trials and had consented to undergo an MRI of the surgical knee 6 to 9 months after surgery. Only 1 participant was lost to follow-up, and 4 did not undergo MRI, leaving a total of 119 patients for this study. qMRI techniques were used to determine the mean cross-sectional area; normalized signal intensity; and a qMRI-based predicted failure load, which was calculated using a prespecified equation based on cross-sectional area and normalized signal intensity. Patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score), clinical measures (hamstring strength, quadriceps strength, and side-to-side knee laxity), and functional outcomes (single-leg hop) were also measured at 6 to 9 months after surgery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for revision surgery based on the qMRI and non-imaging variables. Patient age and medial posterior tibial slope values were included as covariates.

RESULTS

In total, 119 patients (97%), with a median age of 17.6 years, underwent MRI between 6 and 9 months postoperatively. Sixteen of 119 patients (13%) required revision ACL surgery. In univariate analyses, higher International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score at 6 to 9 months postoperatively (OR = 1.66 per 10-point increase; P = .035) and lower qMRI-based predicted failure load (OR = 0.66 per 100-N increase; P = .014) were associated with increased risk of revision surgery. In the multivariable model, when adjusted for age and posterior tibial slope, the qMRI-based predicted failure load was the only significant predictor of revision surgery (OR = 0.71 per 100 N; P = .044).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative MRI-based predicted failure load of the healing ACL was a significant predictor of the risk of revision within 2 years after BEAR surgery. The current findings highlight the potential utility of early qMRI in the postoperative management of patients undergoing the BEAR procedure.

Risk factors of residual pivot-shift after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is considered a successful procedure, residual pivot-shift after surgery remains to be solved. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the risk factors of residual pivot-shift after anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACLR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 164 patients who underwent primary anatomic DB-ACLR between January 2014 and December 2019 and screw removal after the index ACLR in our hospital were included in this retrospective case-control study. The manual pivot-shift test was performed under general anesthesia during screw removal surgery, and patients with grade 1 or higher pivot-shift were classified as the positive pivot-shift group, and those with grade 0 were defined as the negative pivot-shift group. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with postoperative residual pivot-shift. Assessment included sex, age, time to surgery, preoperative Tegner activity scale, preoperative pivot-shift grade, preoperative anterior tibial translation by the KT-2000 arthrometer measurement, meniscus injury and its surgical procedure, knee hyperextension, cartilage damage, Segond fracture, medial and lateral posterior tibial slope, lateral-medial slope asymmetry, participation in pivoting sport/activity at the time of injury, and return to sports at postoperative one year line.

RESULTS

Postoperative positive pivot-shift was observed in 14 (8.5%) of 164 patients. The KT-2000 measurement at 1-year postoperatively was significantly higher in the residual pivot-shift-positive group than in the negative group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age of patients < 20 years [P < 0.05, odds ratio (OR): 6.1)], preoperative pivot-shift grade (P < 0.05, OR: 4.4), and hyperextended knee (P < 0.05, OR: 11.8) were risk factors of postoperative pivot-shift. There were no statistically significant differences between other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients < 20 years of age, with high-grade preoperative pivot-shift, or hyperextended knees had a higher risk of residual postoperative pivot-shift.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Subsequent Ipsilateral ACL Revision Surgery After an ACL Restoration Procedure

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery is challenging for both patients and surgeons. Understanding the risk factors for failure after bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) may help with patient selection for ACL restoration versus ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To identify the preoperative risk factors for ACL revision surgery within the first 2 years after BEAR.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data from the prospective BEAR I, II, and III trials were used to determine the preoperative risk factors for ACL revision surgery. All patients with a complete ACL tear (aged 13-47 years, depending on the trial), who met all other inclusion/exclusion criteria and underwent a primary BEAR procedure within 30 to 50 days from the injury (dependent on the trial), were included. Demographic data (age, sex, body mass index), baseline patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] subjective score, Marx activity score), preoperative imaging results (ACL stump length, notch size, tibial slope), and intraoperative findings (knee hyperextension, meniscal status) were evaluated to determine their contribution to the risk of ipsilateral ACL revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients, with a median age of 17.6 years (interquartile range, 16-23 years), including 67 (54%) female patients, met study criteria. Overall, 18 (15%) patients required ACL revision surgery in the first 2 years after the BEAR procedure. On bivariate analyses, younger age (P = .011), having a contact injury at the time of the initial tear (P = .048), and increased medial tibial slope (MTS; P = .029) were associated with a higher risk of ipsilateral revision surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified 2 independent predictors of revision: patient age and MTS. The odds of ipsilateral revision surgery were decreased by 32% for each 1-year increase in age (odds ratio, 0.684 [95% CI, 0.517-0.905]; P = .008) and increased by 28% for each 1° increase in MTS (odds ratio, 1.280 [95% CI, 1.024-1.601]; P = .030). Sex, baseline IKDC or Marx score, knee hyperextension, and meniscal status were not significant predictors of revision.

CONCLUSION

Younger age and higher MTS were predictors of ipsilateral ACL revision surgery after the BEAR procedure. Younger patients with higher tibial slopes should be aware of the increased risk for revision surgery when deciding to undergo ACL restoration.

Explosive hamstrings strength asymmetry persists despite maximal hamstring strength recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences in maximal (isometric and concentric peak torque) and explosive (rate of torque development (RTD)) hamstring and quadriceps strength symmetry between males and females during early- and late-phase rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts and to determine the interaction of time and sex on maximal and explosive strength symmetry.

METHODS

A total of 38 female and 51 male participants were assessed during early (3-6 months post-operative) and late (7-12 months post-operative) phases of rehabilitation following ACLR. Maximal (concentric and isometric peak torque) and explosive (isometric RTD) hamstring and quadriceps strength were assessed and presented as limb symmetry index (LSI).

RESULTS

Maximal concentric hamstrings asymmetry (Early: 86 ± 14; Late 92 ± 13; p = 0.005) as well as maximal concentric (Early, 73 ± 15; Late 91 ± 12; p < 0.001) and explosive (Early: 82 ± 30; Late: 92 ± 25; p = 0.03) quadriceps asymmetry decreased from early to late rehabilitation. However, there were no significant changes in maximal isometric quadriceps strength and explosive isometric hamstring strength in the same time period. Females had a larger asymmetry in maximal concentric (Females: 75 ± 17; Males: 81 ± 15; p = 0.001) and explosive (Females: 81 ± 32; Males: 89 ± 25; p = 0.01) quadriceps strength than males throughout rehabilitation. There were no sex differences in maximal and explosive hamstring strength. There were no sex by time interactions for any variables.

CONCLUSION

Explosive hamstring strength asymmetry did not improve despite recovery of maximal hamstring strength during rehabilitation following ACLR with HT autografts. While sex did not influence strength recovery, females had larger maximal and explosive quadriceps strength asymmetry compared to males throughout rehabilitation following ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Predicting the Objective and Subjective Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Machine Learning Analysis of 432 Patients

BACKGROUND

Sports levels, baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and surgical procedures are correlated with the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Machine learning may be superior to conventional statistical methods in making repeatable and accurate predictions.

PURPOSE

To identify the best-performing machine learning models for predicting the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of ACLR and to determine the most important predictors.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 432 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft between January 2010 and February 2019 were included in the machine learning analysis. A total of 15 predictive variables and 6 outcome variables were selected to validate the logistic regression, Gaussian naïve Bayes machine, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), isotonically calibrated XGBoost, and sigmoid calibrated XGBoost models. For each clinical outcome, the best-performing model was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), whereas the importance and direction of each predictive variable were demonstrated in a Shapley Additive Explanations summary plot.

RESULTS

The AUC and accuracy of the best-performing model, respectively, were 0.944 (excellent) and 98.6% for graft failure; 0.920 (excellent) and 91.4% for residual laxity; 0.930 (excellent) and 91.0% for failure to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Lysholm score; 0.942 (excellent) and 95.1% for failure to achieve the MCID of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score; 0.773 (fair) and 70.5% for return to preinjury sports; and 0.777 (fair) and 69.2% for return to pivoting sports. Medial meniscal resection, participation in competitive sports, and steep posterior tibial slope were top predictors of graft failure, whereas high-grade preoperative knee laxity, long follow-up period, and participation in competitive sports were top predictors of residual laxity. High preoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were highly predictive of not achieving the MCIDs of PROMs. Young age, male sex, high preoperative IKDC score, and large graft diameter were important predictors of return to preinjury or pivoting sports.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning analysis can provide reliable predictions for the objective and subjective clinical outcomes (graft failure, residual laxity, PROMs, and return to sports) of ACLR. Patient-specific evaluation and decision making are recommended before and after surgery.

Effects of Initial Graft Tension and Patient Sex on Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes After ACL Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With 10- to 12-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The initial graft tension applied during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation may promote posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA).

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

This study sought to assess the effect of initial graft tension and patient sex on PTOA outcomes at 10 to 12 years after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). The hypothesis was that there would be no group- or sex-based differences in outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive ACLR with a low or high initial graft tension. Outcomes were evaluated at 10 to 12 years postoperatively and compared with a matched, uninjured control group. Outcomes included clinical assessments (anteroposterior [AP] knee laxity measurement, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] examination score), a functional assessment (single-leg hop for distance), patient-reported outcomes (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Tegner activity level, patient satisfaction), and PTOA imaging (Osteoarthritis Research Society International [OARSI] radiographic score and Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score [WORMS]). Two-way mixed-model analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in outcomes between tension groups and the control group and between female and male patients.

RESULTS

Both tension groups scored worse than the control group for the IKDC examination (P≤ .021), KOOS (Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sport/Recreation, and Quality of Life subscales) (P≤ .049), and WORMS difference score (P≤ .042). The low-tension group scored worse than the control group for KOOS Symptoms (P = .016) and the OARSI difference score (P = .015). The index limb had worse scores than the contralateral limb within the high-tension group for AP laxity (P = .030) and hop deficit (P = .011). This result was also observed within both tension groups for the WORMS (P≤ .050) and within the low-tension group for the OARSI score (P = .001). Male patients had higher Tegner scores (mean ± SE) relative to female patients (male, 5.49 ± 1.88; female, 4.45 ± 1.65) and worse OARSI difference scores (male, 1.89 ± 5.38; female, 0.244 ± 0.668) (P = .007 and .034, respectively). However, no significant differences were detected between tension groups for any of the outcomes measured.

CONCLUSION

Overall, ACLR failed to prevent PTOA regardless of initial graft tension. However, male patients treated with a low initial graft tension may be at greater risk for PTOA. These results do not support the hypothesis of no sex differences in outcomes at 10 to 12 years after ACLR.

Patient reported outcome measures in anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: The significance of outcome score prediction

BACKGROUND

Numerous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) clinical outcome measures exist. However, the result of one score does not equate to the findings of another even when evaluating the same patient group.

AIM

To investigate if statistically derived formulae can be used to predict the outcome of one knee scoring system when the result of another is known in patients with ACL rupture before and after reconstruction.

METHODS

Fifty patients with ACL rupture were evaluated using nine clinical outcome measures. These included Tegner Activity Score, Lysholm Knee Score, Cincinnati Knee Score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Knee Score, Tapper and Hoover Meniscal Grading Score, IKDC Subjective Knee Score, Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Short Form-12 Item Health Survey and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Thirty-four patients underwent an ACL reconstruction and were reassessed post-operatively.

RESULTS

The mean total of each of the nine outcome scores appreciably differed from each other. Significant correlations and regressions were found between most of the outcome scores and were stronger post-operatively. The strongest correlation was found between Cincinnati and KOS-ADLS (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). The strongest regression formula was also found between Cincinnati and KOS-ADLS (R² = 0.84, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The formulae produced from this study can be used to predict the outcome of one knee score when the results of the other are known. These formulae could facilitate the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in studies relating to ACL injuries by allowing the pooling of substantially more data.