Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Program (GIOP): a novel, comprehensive, and highly successful care program with improved outcomes at 1 year

Challenges in the diagnosis and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in younger and older adults

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoids constitute a considerable risk for developing osteoporosis in both younger and older adults. However, currently available bone imaging modalities and fracture-risk assessment tools do not adequately capture the dramatic changes in bone microarchitecture, heterogeneity of glucocorticoid exposure, the impact of chronic disease and other osteoporosis risk factors on the assessment of osteoporosis in these individuals.

DESIGN

A narrative review is presented, following a systematic search of the literature from 2000 to 2021.

RESULTS

Our current appreciation of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is focused on older populations, with limited evidence to guide the investigation, risk assessment and treatment in premenopausal women and men less than 50 years. The impact of the underlying chronic disease on secondary osteoporosis in these younger adults is also poorly understood.

CONCLUSION

Through this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of and recommendations for optimising the management of this common cause of secondary osteoporosis younger and older adults.

Elaborate the Mechanism of Ancient Classic Prescriptions (Erzhi Formula) in Reversing GIOP by Network Pharmacology Coupled with Zebrafish Verification

Osteoporosis is a degenerative disease that endangers human health. At present, chemical drugs used for osteoporosis have serious side effects. Therefore, it is valuable to search herbs with high safety and good curative effect in antiosteoporosis. Erzhi formula (EZF), an ancient classic compound, has been reported to have a beneficial effect in antiosteoporosis, but its mechanism is unclear. In this paper, the active compounds of EZF were found in Systems Pharmacology Database, and gene targets related to osteoporosis were obtained in GeneCards. The GO functional and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis were performed by Metascape. The network of “components-targets-signal pathway” was constructed by Cytoscape. Next, molecular docking between the active components and hub genes related to the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was conducted by Autodock. In the verification experiment, the zebrafish induced by prednisolone (PNSL) was used to reproduce glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) model, and then the reversal effects of EZF were systematically evaluated according to the behavior, skull staining area, bone mineralization area (BMA), average optical density (AOD), and cumulative optical density (COD). Finally, it was shown that 24 components in EZF could regulate 39 common gene targets to exert antiosteoporosis effect. Besides, the main regulatory mechanisms of EZF were 4 signaling pathways: PI3K-Akt, JAK-STAT, AGE-RAGE, and cancer pathway. In PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, wedelolactone, dimethyl wedelolactone, specnuezhenide, ursolic acid, acacetin, beta-sitosterol, apigenin, and kaempferol can bind tightly with EGF, IL-2, and IL-4 genes. Compared with the model group, the moving distance, swimming speed, and cumulative swimming time of zebrafish in EZF group were significantly increased (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the BMA and COD of zebrafish were significantly improved after the intervention of EZF (P < 0.05). In summary, the 24 components of EZF exert their antiosteoporosis effects by regulating 39 related gene targets, among which the PI3K signaling pathway is crucial. EZF can promote bone formation and reversed GIOP through “multicomponent/multitarget/multipathway” and the medium dose of EZF may be the most suitable concentration for the treatment of GIOP in zebrafish model.

A join point regression analysis of trends in mortality due to osteoporosis in Spain

Osteoporosis is a major health problem in terms of fracture probability and disability. The aim of this ecological study is to identify the temporal trends in osteoporosis mortality in Spain from 1999 to 2015. Data on the Spanish population and number of deaths due to osteoporosis were obtained from the Spanish National Institute for Statistics. Age-adjusted mortality rates were estimated. Join point regression was used to identify the years when changes in mortality s and annual percentage change in mortality rates took place. Women presented a greater mortality rate decrease (p < 0.001), though this mortality difference by sex was reduced by half at the end of the period. The higher the age, the faster the mortality rate declined in women, while no clear pattern could be identified in men. In women, significant changes in trends were identified in three age groups (50-54, 60-64 and 80-84 years old). A sustained decrease in osteoporosis-associated mortality was found in women aged 75-79 and ≥85 years and men aged 60-64. In conclusion, mortality caused by osteoporosis in Spain is decreasing faster in the older age ranges especially in women.

Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Management Challenges in Older Patients

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis remains the most common type of secondary osteoporosis, mostly due to use of oral glucocorticoids rather than due to endogenous overproduction of cortisol. Partly because glucocorticoids are prescribed by a wide variety of clinicians for many different inflammatory disorders, only a minority of older individuals have adequate and timely assessment of their enhanced fracture risk, and fewer are offered treatment. Assessment should include bone density, the FRAX calculation, and, in many cases, images of the spine. Glucocorticoids decrease osteoblast function and increase apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes, leading to increased fracture risk soon after starting glucocorticoids. Guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for evaluation and treatment, but there are differences in extant guidelines, and methods to improve adherence to the guidelines have mostly failed. A strong case can be made to use anabolic drugs first in high-risk patients based on pathophysiology and head-to-head clinical trials.

Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures

This narrative review considers the key challenges facing healthcare professionals and policymakers responsible for providing care to populations in relation to bone health. These challenges broadly fall into four distinct themes: (1) case finding and management of individuals at high risk of fracture, (2) public awareness of osteoporosis and fragility fractures, (3) reimbursement and health system policy and (4) epidemiology of fracture in the developing world. Findings from cohort studies, randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in addition to current clinical guidelines, position papers and national and international audits, are summarised, with the intention of providing a prioritised approach to delivery of optimal bone health for all. Systematic approaches to case-finding individuals who are at high risk of sustaining fragility fractures are described. These include strategies and models of care intended to improve case finding for individuals who have sustained fragility fractures, those undergoing treatment with medicines which have an adverse effect on bone health and people who have diseases, whereby bone loss and, consequently, fragility fractures are a common comorbidity. Approaches to deliver primary fracture prevention in a clinically effective and cost-effective manner are also explored. Public awareness of osteoporosis is low worldwide. If older people are to be more pro-active in the management of their bone health, that needs to change. Effective disease awareness campaigns have been implemented in some countries but need to be undertaken in many more. A major need exists to improve awareness of the risk that osteoporosis poses to individuals who have initiated treatment, with the intention of improving adherence in the long term. A multisector effort is also required to support patients and their clinicians to have meaningful discussions concerning the risk-benefit ratio of osteoporosis treatment. With regard to prioritisation of fragility fracture prevention in national policy, there is much to be done. In the developing world, robust epidemiological estimates of fracture incidence are required to inform policy development. As the aging of the baby boomer generation is upon us, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of how bone health can be improved worldwide for all.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pathophysiological role of GH/IGF-I and PTH/VITAMIN D axes, treatment options and guidelines

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most frequent form of secondary osteoporosis caused by chronic exposure to glucocorticoid excess. Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is multifactorial including direct effects of glucocorticoids on bone cells and indirect effects of glucocorticoids on several neuroendocrine and metabolic pathways. Fragility fractures occur early in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and anti-osteoporotic drugs along with calcium and vitamin D should be started soon after exposure to glucocorticoid excess. This paper summarizes some of the main topics discussed during the 9th Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Meeting (Rome, April 2016) with a specific focus on the role of growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 and parathyroid hormone/vitamin D axes in the pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and the controversial aspects concerning therapeutic approach to skeletal fragility in this clinical setting.

Analysis of quality improvement efforts in preventing glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To report and analyze quality improvement (QI) efforts that are aimed at increasing adherence to preventive guidelines for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP).

METHODS

We performed a PubMed literature search for full-length articles in English between 1966 and 2013, describing approaches for improving the quality of GIOP care. We reviewed articles using a structured approach and abstracted information on the patient population, study design, QI intervention, and primary outcome measures. A descriptive analysis was then performed.

RESULTS

Literature search identified 661 articles; 38 were screened by abstract, 10 were identified for full review, and 7 were included. Two non-randomized, uncontrolled studies of system changes showed significant improvements in GIOP prevention: one increased concomitant prescriptions of glucocorticoids and calcium (37-49%, p < 0.0001) and vitamin D (38-53%, p < 0.0001) using a computerized order entry system; another used a dedicated clinical team to increase vitamin D levels from 19.5 to 29.4 (p = 0.001) and improve GIOP-related habits. Five articles described education-based interventions, including 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two non-significant RCTs focused on physicians, but one directed towards pharmacists and patients did increase calcium supplementation in the intervention vs. control arm (55.7% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.05). Two other non-randomized educational interventions did not show benefits. Comparison of articles was limited by the heterogeneity of the intervention methods and outcome measures used.

CONCLUSION

None of the interventions produced robust changes, with overall adherence to GIOP guidelines remaining low. System-based interventions appeared more effective than education-based interventions, but a diverse array of factors likely needs to be addressed, requiring more randomized controlled trials and greater standardization of outcome measures.

High-risk osteoporosis clinic (HiROC): improving osteoporosis and postfracture care with an organized, programmatic approach

SUMMARY

A programmatic outpatient high-risk osteoporosis clinic (outpatient HiROC) and inpatient fracture liaison service (inpatient HiROC) is described. Results document that this population is more effectively treated and followed up in this specialty pathway than with primary care follow-up.

INTRODUCTION

We describe a programmatic approach to outpatient care of high-risk osteoporosis patients (outpatient HiROC). We similarly describe an inpatient fracture liaison service (inpatient HiROC), which integrates into the existing outpatient HiROC pathway.

METHODS

The development of outpatient HiROC and inpatient HiROC is described. Outpatient visits (July 29, 2008 to October 27, 2011) are included with a 200 patients random sample calculation. Inpatient consultation visits between November 18, 2008 and October 27, 2011 are included.

RESULTS

Between July 29, 2008 and December 31, 2011, 1917 outpatient consults were seen. Of the 200 patient samples, 87% were female, mean age of 69.8 years, previous fractures occurred in 34% patients, and glucocorticoid users constituted 10.6%. Eighty-six percent of this group was high risk, where drug therapy is indicated, and such treatment was started in 89%. A total of 1041 inpatient fracture consults were seen during the evaluable period; 14.7% of this population died before the 6-month follow-up. Females comprised 77.6%, mean age was 76.1 years, and 58.2% of fractures were hip fragility, 11.6% vertebral, and 1.7% midshaft and 1.6% subtrochanteric. Patients seen in our outpatient HiROC pathway were significantly more likely to be treated than those followed up by one of our primary care doctors (80.6 versus 32.2%, P<0.0001). Mean vitamin D levels at baseline (27.0 ng/mL) improved to 34.6 ng/mL at 6-month follow-up (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our outpatient and inpatient HiROC model is efficient and effective in risk stratifying and treating patients at high risk for fractures.

Challenges in implementing and maintaining osteoporosis therapy

In the United States, an estimated 19% of older men and 30% of older women are at elevated risk of osteoporotic fracture and considered to be eligible for treatment. The burden of osteoporosis is similar in Europe and is projected to rise worldwide, with aging populations and increasing fracture rates accompanying urbanization. Notwithstanding its high prevalence, osteoporosis is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Moreover, even when the diagnosis is made and the decision is taken to treat, there are remaining challenges in implementing therapy for osteoporosis. Several patient populations are particularly challenging for clinicians to treat and require further study with regard to osteoporosis therapy. These include the very elderly, who face challenges relating to adherence; men, in whom osteoporosis remains under-recognized; patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis or renal impairment, who are at increased risk of fracture; patients with preexisting gastrointestinal problems who cannot tolerate existing orally administered osteoporosis therapies; and high-risk patients who show inadequate response to therapy. Moreover, poor adherence and poor persistence with osteoporosis medications are common and result in an increased risk of fracture, higher medical costs, and increased hospitalizations. Once the decision to institute therapy is made, patient education about osteoporosis and fracture risk should be provided. This is particularly important for men, who may not be aware that osteoporosis can be a concern. Secondary prevention programs, including fracture liaison services and bone therapy groups, can help to improve adherence to therapy. Further study is needed to guide the treatment of men, the very elderly, patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and renal impairment, high-risk patients not well-controlled despite therapy, and patients with preexisting gastrointestinal conditions. Moreover, therapies are needed that are viewed as effective and safe by both physicians and patients, and as convenient to take by patients.

Use of an educational support program to assist patients receiving injectable osteoporosis treatment: experience with teriparatide

OBJECTIVE

Low treatment adherence and persistence are important considerations in the management of chronic disorders such as osteoporosis, as they are linked to the reduced effectiveness of drug therapy. As teriparatide (Forsteo, Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Spain) is administered by subcutaneous injection using a customized delivery device for 24 months to reduce fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis, an educational support program was developed to assist patients with correctly administering the treatment.

METHODS

All patients in Spain can voluntarily participate in this ongoing program, which consists of up to 22 phone calls, by a qualified and licensed nurse trained in use of the delivery device, that are designed to improve patients' knowledge of, and to provide a reminder as to how to use, the device. Patients are also sent educational material regarding the delivery device and osteoporosis, and regularly receive needles suitable for the device. This study presents persistence data for all 23,069 patients registered in the program and prescribed teriparatide between September 2007 and June 2010.

RESULTS

Persistence in the program was 90.8% at 3 months, 83.5% at 6 months, 74.8% at 12 months, 68.5% at 18 months, and 64.1% at 24 months. Patient satisfaction with the educational support program was high at all assessment times, and patients generally found the delivery device easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that patients from all provinces in Spain with severe osteoporosis receiving teriparatide and enrolled in an educational support program had high persistence and satisfaction with the program. However, no control group was included in these analyses and it is possible that selection bias occurred. It is suggested that patient-based strategies similar to this could be beneficial for all long-term treatments.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is one of the most devastating side-effects of glucocorticoid (GC) use, as it is associated with an increased fracture risk. The importance of GIOP as a health problem is underlined by the frequent use of GC treatment in patients with various chronic diseases and by the high rates of osteoporosis found in these patient groups.

AREAS COVERED

Recent studies on bone metabolism and the influence of GCs have contributed to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of GIOP. Furthermore, new intervention trials have reported beneficial effects of antiresorptive and anabolic agents on GIOP. This article reviews the epidemiology and pathophysiology of osteoporosis and fractures in GC-treated patients and discusses current pharmacotherapy and possible future treatment options.

EXPERT OPINION

Several guidelines for the management of GIOP have been published, using different criteria for bone mineral density (BMD) thresholds and for GC dosages above which anti-osteoporotic therapy should be started. Although alendronate and risedronate are currently first choice, the anabolic agent teriparatide seems to be superior and might be considered as a potential first-line therapy for patients with low BMD on long-term GC treatment. Adherence to anti-osteoporotic drugs is limited, particularly in GIOP patients, due to several factors.

Long-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability of teriparatide in the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoids are commonly prescribed medications to treat multiple diseases across many medical specialties. One of the most common yet largely unappreciated side effect of glucocorticoid use is increased risk of fracture. Many different therapies are indicated to prevent and treat this condition; many guidelines exist that suggest appropriate use of both glucocorticoids and the medications approved to prevent this common side effect of glucocorticoid therapy. Nevertheless, 30%-50% of patients on long-term glucocorticoid therapy sustain a fracture. Teriparatide, recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34), is a daily self-injectable therapy for 24 months approved for use in patients taking long-term glucocorticoids. Teriparatide has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce vertebral fracture risk in glucocorticoid-treated patients. Glucocorticoids have many adverse effects on bone that teriparatide has been shown to prevent or negate. Given the fact that preventive therapy for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is often not prescribed, one wonders whether a daily self-injectable therapy for this condition would be prescribed by physicians and accepted by patients. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, guidelines, and persistence data (when available) for patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis treated with teriparatide.

Complications of long-term therapy for ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis

The antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated systemic vasculitides (AASVs) include granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. These conditions are characterized by small-vessel inflammation and necrosis, predominantly in pulmonary and renal vascular beds. Untreated AASV has a poor prognosis, although the advent of effective immunosuppressive therapy (the mainstay of which remains cyclophosphamide with high-dose corticosteroids) has markedly improved patients' survival (78% at 5 years). Patients with AASV, however, continue to have an increased mortality compared to the general population. Mortality is greatest in the first year after diagnosis and remains consistently elevated in subsequent years. Patients with AASV also experience increased rates of infections, malignancies and cardiovascular events as compared to the general population. Current treatments for AASV, although effective in controlling the aggressive systemic disease, incur substantial long-term toxic effects. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy also has notable deleterious effects on bone health and fertility. The long-term safety profiles of biological therapies (such as rituximab) are yet to be evaluated in patients with AASV, but represent a promising treatment option. The challenge for the future is to develop specific therapies with improved safety profiles that can cure these diseases.

Appraising osteoporosis care gaps

To evaluate physician response to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) report within the Geisinger Medical Center's Mobile DXA Program and treatment adherence at 1 year. Between 10/01/2004 and 3/30/2005, 1381 DXA scans were performed in our Mobile DXA Program. Within this cohort, we identified 366 high-risk, drug-naive patients and report the percentage of patients placed on prescription drug therapy within 90 days of DXA result. Additionally, we identified 191 patients with Z-score of -1.0 or worse and report whether laboratory tests were ordered within 90 days of DXA results in this group. Finally, we determined treatment adherence at 1 year. 269 patients (74%) were offered prescription therapy within 3 months of DXA results. Of those, 210 (57%) were still adherent to drug therapy at 1 year. The main reason for discontinuation of treatment was an adverse drug side effect. Additionally, in 50% cases, physicians ordered 1 or more laboratory tests to evaluate low Z-score. Within our Mobile DXA Program, 74% of high-risk, drug-naïve patients were treated. Interestingly, in 50% cases, when a low Z-score was reported, our physicians ordered 1 or more laboratory tests. Treatment adherence was 57% at 1 year.

Postfracture interventions disseminated through health care and drug insurers: attempting to integrate fragmented health care delivery

Osteoporosis care after a fracture is often suboptimal. Suboptimal treatment seems to be most common in fragmented health care systems. We examined the literature to assess possible causes for suboptimal postfracture osteoporosis care within fragmented health care systems. The review of the literature did not attempt to meta-analyze prior studies. We found several possible methods for improving postfracture osteoporosis care in a fragmented health care system. These include changes in health care financing, application of information technology, incorporation of case management, the use of system champions, and dissemination of performance measures. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these potential levers for improvement were explored. Postfracture osteoporosis care is sub-optimal and challenging to improve in fragmented health care delivery systems.

Perspectives on pre-fracture intervention strategies: the Geisinger Health System Osteoporosis Program

In its first decade, the goals of the Geisinger Health System Osteoporosis Program at its inception were to increase awareness, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis and to monitor predefined outcomes. The program was innovative in that it crossed specialties and regions and used guidelines in an effective manner. In addition, success in reducing hip fracture and cost were demonstrated, and it remains one of the few programs today that has done so, as reported by Newman et al. (Osteoporos Int 14:146-151, 2003). The osteoporosis program has now moved from a provider and allied provider empowerment focus to reorganizing our thoughts about how to best manage osteoporosis care across our healthcare system by defining and acting on four major osteoporosis care gaps: (1) at-risk patients do not get tested, (2) tested patients are not accurately risk assessed, (3) high-risk patients do not get treated, and (4) treated patients are not adherent. Results of current internal programs and future steps are discussed.

Advances in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is one of the most important side effects of glucocorticoid use, as it leads to an increased risk of fractures. Recently, many published studies have focused on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone metabolism, the pathophysiology of GIOP, and the intervention options to prevent GIOP. In this review, recent advances in GIOP are summarized, particularly recent progress in our understanding of the mechanisms of GIOP resulting in improved insight that might result in the development of new treatment options in the near future.

The protective role of bone morphogenetic protein-8 in the glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis on bone cells

One of the side effects associated with glucocorticoid therapy is glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. Glucocorticoids partly detain bone formation via the inhibition of osteoblastic function, however, the exact mechanism of this inhibition remains elusive. In this study, we examined the effect of dexamethasone, an active glucocorticoid analogue, on cell viability and expression of bone remodelling-related genes in primary mouse calvarial and cloned MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. Using sensitive biochemical assays, we demonstrated the apoptotic effect of dexamethasone on osteoblastic cells. Then, utilizing Taqman probe-based quantitative RT-PCR technology, gene expression profiles of 111 bone metabolism-related genes were determined. As a result of dexamethasone treatment we have detected significant apoptotic cell death, and six genes, including Smad3, type-2 collagen α-1, type-9 collagen α-1, matrix metalloproteinase-2, bone morphogenetic protein-4 and bone morphogenetic protein-8 showed (BMP-8) significant changes in their expression on a time- and concentration-dependent manner. BMP-8, (a novel player in bone-metabolism) exhibited a two orders of magnitude elevation in its mRNA level and highly elevated protein concentration by Western blot in response to dexamethasone treatment. The knockdown of BMP-8 by RNA interference significantly increased dexamethasone-induced cell death, confirming a protective role for BMP-8 in the glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis of osteoblasts. Our results suggest that BMP-8 might be an essential player in bone metabolism, especially in response to glucocorticoids.

Cost-effectiveness of multifaceted evidence implementation programs for the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

SUMMARY

Using a computer simulation model, we determined that an intervention aimed at improving the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is likely to be cost-effective to third-party health insurers only if it focuses on individuals with very high fracture risk and the proportion of prescriptions for generic bisphosphonates increases substantially.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an evidence implementation program (intervention) focused on increasing appropriate management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) might be cost-effective compared with current practice (no intervention) from the perspective of a third-party health insurer.

METHODS

We developed a Markov microsimulation model to determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The hypothetical patient cohort was of current chronic glucocorticoid users 50-65 years old and 70% female. Model parameters were derived from published literature, and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The intervention resulted in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $298,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and $206,000 per hip fracture averted. If the cohort's baseline risk of fracture was increased by 50% (10-year cumulative incidence of hip fracture of 14%), the ICERs improved significantly: $105,000 per QALY and $137,000 per hip fracture averted. The ICERs improved significantly if the proportion of prescriptions for generic bisphosphonates was increased to 75%, with $113,000 per QALY and $77,900 per hip fracture averted.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence implementation programs for the management of GIOP are likely to be cost-effective to third-party health insurers only if they are targeted at individuals with a very high risk of fracture and the proportion of prescriptions for less expensive generic bisphosphonates increases substantially.

Prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis. The role of the Wnt signaling pathway in bone formation and the ratio of receptor activator for NF-kappaB ligand versus osteoprotegerin in bone resorption are exciting new insights. The absolute fracture risk helps both clinicians and patients to interpret the results of bone density measurement, which may have a positive influence on adherence to therapy. The bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are the first-line treatment in the prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, because both increase the bone mineral density of the spine and hips and reduce the vertebral fracture rate. Treatment with the anabolic agent parathyroid hormone (1 - 34) strongly stimulates bone turnover, and seems to be superior to treatment with alendronate. It might be attractive for glucocorticoid-treated patients with new vertebral fractures during treatment with bisphosphonates, and/or with severe fracture risk.

Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

A significant gap exists between evidence-based advances and real-world clinical practice in the diagnosis and prevention of osteoporosis. The goal of osteoporosis care is to prevent fractures and improve health-related quality of life, and ideally lower mortality. Despite recent advances in osteoporosis detection and treatment options, studies suggest underdiagnosis and undertreatment of osteoporosis, even among those who have already sustained fractures. The challenges in translating knowledge into practice are multifaceted, with efforts directed at the patient, provider, and health care system levels achieving variable success at the population level. Methods to improve quality of care in osteoporosis need to be multipronged, with emphasis on clinical process improvement and reliance on interdisciplinary teams. We review the growing literature on quality of care for osteoporosis.

Teriparatide following bisphosphonates: initial and long-term effects on microarchitecture and bone remodeling at the human iliac crest

Since the approval of teriparatide for clinical application, a number of iliac crest studies have focused on increases in bone volume or changes in structural parameters with microCT and numerical changes in histomorphometry. This investigation is based on individual histopathological observations related to early and late effects of teriparatide treatment in humans. A total of 44 (18 paired) iliac crest biopsies (ICB) from 41 patients receiving teriparatide (10 months +/- 6 months) following bisphosphonate (BP) treatment were investigated for hematopoietic changes, bone turnover, and description of microarchitectural changes using histology and selective microCT. Fully 71% of the ICB showed a normal or high bone turnover; 56% of the paired ICB presented an increase in bone turnover following teriparatide treatment. Early teriparatide stimulation (<1 month) resulted in peritrabecular fibroblast-like formations. Rare findings (<9%) included reactive hematopoietic changes, osteoidosis, endosteal fibrosis, microcallus, or woven bone. Round mast cells were frequently observed within marrow spaces. A total of 14% had an increase in cortical porosity, approximately 20% demonstrated signs of intratrabecular resorption sites. Teriparatide treatment resulted in an increase in remodeling units as early as 1 week after the first application with a continuous stimulation up to 18 months of rhPTH treatment despite previous BPs. Subgroups of patients developed increased cortical and/or intratrabecular resorption pattern, with unclear biomechanical significance. This mechanism could potentially result in new trabecular structures with an increase in trabecular number. Some individuals presented histological findings (e.g., fibrosis) that may require adjustment of treatment that could be of importance for clinical efficacy.

Managing adverse effects of disease-modifying agents used for treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

First-line agents approved in the United States for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) include intramuscular interferon beta (IFNbeta)-1a, subcutaneous (SC) IFNbeta-1a, SC IFNbeta-1b, and SC glatiramer acetate. Intravenous mitoxantrone is the only agent approved for secondary progressive MS, progressive relapsing MS, and worsening relapsing MS. Intravenous natalizumab is approved for relapsing forms of MS generally in patients who have an inadequate response to, or are unable to tolerate, first-line therapies. Corticosteroids are commonly used to treat relapses. This paper reviews the incidence and management of common adverse events (AEs) associated with these treatments.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for clinical trials and other publications between 1985 and 2007 reporting AEs associated with MS therapies, using these search terms: multiple sclerosis, interferon, Avonex, Betaseron, Rebif, glatiramer, copolymer 1, Copaxone, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, adverse events.

RESULTS

A class-specific flu-like syndrome associated with IFNbeta can be managed through initial dose escalation and administration of analgesics and antipyretics, prophylactically or symptomatically. Injection-site reactions can occur in patients receiving injectable therapies, particularly SC IFNbeta or glatiramer acetate. The greatest risk to patients receiving mitoxantrone is cardiotoxicity; thus, the cumulative dose is limited. Allergic reactions occur rarely with natalizumab, and there is a potential risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. AEs associated with short-term pulse corticosteroid therapy are usually transient and largely resolve after treatment is completed.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve adherence to therapy, it is important to educate patients regarding AEs and to manage AEs proactively.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis prevention: longitudinal practice patterns in The Netherlands 2001-2005

We investigated prevention trends and predictors for osteoporosis prevention in long term corticosteroid users. The use of bisphosphonates increased from 2001 to 2005. Longer duration of corticosteroid use and DMARD use were predictors for receiving prevention. Females appear reasonably well treated; however, men require more attention.

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown that long-term corticosteroid users are undertreated for osteoporosis prevention. Our aim was to identify prevention trends in long-term corticosteroid users from 2001-2005 in The Netherlands and to identify predictors for bisphosphonate prophylaxis.

METHODS

Pharmacy dispensing data were used from 9 community pharmacies. All oral corticosteroid doses were converted to "prednisolone equivalents". We then identified long-term (> or =90 days) corticosteroid episodes, which required bisphosphonate prophylaxis as per 2002 Dutch guidelines; Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for receiving prevention.

RESULTS

We identified 615 different corticosteroid patients requiring prophylaxis. From 2001-2005 the use of bisphosphonates increased from 38% to 54% (p = 0.001). In 2005 females were prescribed more bisphosphonates than males (61% vs. 39%; p = 0.002), or any treatment (72% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that longer duration of corticosteroid use and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) use were independent predictors of bisphosphonate use. Use of respiratory medication was a negative predictor of bisphosphonate use.

CONCLUSION

There has been a significant increase in osteoporosis prophylaxis in a population at high risk for osteoporosis/fractures. In particular, females appear reasonably well treated; however, men are still not receiving prevention to the same degree as women.

An update on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glucocorticoids are widely used, often long term, and a major side effect is osteoporosis and increased risk of fracture. This review considers how common is the problem, the patients who are most at risk, our current understanding of mechanisms, and how to prevent and effectively treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. The actions currently being undertaken in clinical practice are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is an increasing problem that occurs not only in those on high-dose therapy. Advances in our knowledge of the cellular and cytokine mechanisms of bone turnover and glucocorticoid mechanisms of action are leading to a better understanding of how glucocorticoids affect bone cells and novel ways of prevention. Although there are effective treatments to prevent and control glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis as well as guidelines for their use, they are still not being applied in routine clinical practice.

SUMMARY

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is a significant problem. Although our understanding of effective prevention and treatment strategies is improving, there needs to be better implementation of these strategies.

Emerging consensus on prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is a common but still relatively neglected problem, with a low level of awareness among primary and secondary care physicians. Fractures appear early after initiation of treatment, and effective prophylaxis requires primary prevention in those at high risk of fracture. Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice, and calcium and vitamin D supplements are also indicated in the majority of individuals. Organized care programs together with the use of evidence-based guidelines have the potential to improve significantly the management of this serious complication of glucocorticoid therapy.