Assessing response to osteoporosis therapy

Bone fragility: conceptual framework, therapeutic implications, and COVID-19-related issues

Bone fragility is the susceptibility to fracture even for common loads because of structural, architectural, or material alterations of bone tissue that result in poor bone strength. In osteoporosis, quantitative and qualitative changes in density, geometry, and micro-architecture modify the internal stress state predisposing to fragility fractures. Bone fragility substantially depends on the structural behavior related to the size and shape of the bone characterized by different responses in the load-deformation curve and on the material behavior that reflects the intrinsic material properties of the bone itself, such as yield and fatigue. From a clinical perspective, the measurement of bone density by DXA remains the gold standard for defining the risk of fragility fracture in all population groups. However, non-quantitative parameters, such as macro-architecture, geometry, tissue material properties, and microcracks accumulation can modify the bone's mechanical strength. This review provides an overview of the role of different contributors to bone fragility and how these factors might be influenced by the use of anti-osteoporotic drugs and by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Proceedings of the 2022 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: Current Concepts in the Care of Patients with Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases

The 22^nd Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium (SFBS) was a hybrid meeting held August 5-6, 2022, with in-person and virtual attendees. Altogether, over 400 individuals registered, a majority of whom attended in-person, representing many states in the USA plus 7 other countries. The SFBS included 10 plenary presentations, 2 faculty panel discussions, satellite symposia, Bone Health & Osteoporosis Foundation Fracture Liaison Service Boot Camp, and a Project ECHO workshop, with lively interactive discussions for all events. Topics of interest included fracture prevention at different stages of life; how to treat and when to change therapy; skeletal health in cancer patients; advanced imaging to assess bone strength; the state of healthcare in the USA; osteosarcopenia; vitamin D update; perioperative bone health care; new guidelines for managing primary hyperparathyroidism; new concepts on bone modeling and remodeling; and an overview on the care of rare bone diseases, including hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, tumor induced osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, and osteopetrosis. The SFBS was preceded by the Santa Fe Fellows Workshop on Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, a collaboration of the Endocrine Fellows Foundation and the Osteoporosis Foundation of New Mexico. From the Workshop, 4 participating fellows were selected to give oral presentations at the bone symposium. These proceedings represent the clinical highlights of 2022 SFBS presentations and the discussions that followed, all with the aim of optimizing skeletal health and minimizing the consequences of fragile bones.

Management of postmenopausal women: Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) and Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement (GEMVi) Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The aim of these recommendations is to set forth an individualized approach to the management of early postmenopausal women (i.e., within the first 10 years after natural menopause) covering all aspects of lifestyle and therapeutic management, with or without menopause hormone therapy (MHT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of French expert opinion. Recommendations were graded according to the HAS methodology and levels of evidence derived from the international literature, except when there was no good-quality evidence.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

The beginning of menopause is an ideal time for each woman to evaluate her health status by assessing her bone, cardiovascular, and cancer-related risk factors that may be amplified by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and by reviewing her lifestyle habits. Improving lifestyle, including nutrition and physical activity, and avoiding risk factors (notably smoking), should be recommended to all women. MHT remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms but it could be also recommended as first-line treatment for the prevention of osteoporosis in early postmenopausal women at low to moderate risk for fracture. The risks of MHT differ depending on its type, dose, duration of use, route of administration, timing of initiation, and whether a progestogen is used. There is reasonable evidence that using transdermal estradiol in association with micronized progesterone or dydrogesterone may limit both the venous thromboembolic risk associated with oral estrogens and the risk of breast cancer associated with synthetic progestins. Treatment should be individualized to each woman, by using the best available evidence to maximize benefits and minimize risks, with periodic reevaluation of its benefit-risk balance. For bothersome genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) symptoms, vaginal treatment with lubricants and moisturizers is recommended as first-line treatment together with low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy, depending on the clinical course. No recommendation of an optimal duration of MHT can be made, but it must take into consideration the initial indication for MHT as well as each woman's benefit-risk balance. Management of gynecological side-effects of MHT is also examined. These recommendations are endorsed by the Groupe d'Etude sur la Ménopause et le Vieillissement hormonal (GEMVI) and the Collège National des Gynécologues-Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF).

Bone mineral density response prediction following osteoporosis treatment using machine learning to aid personalized therapy

Osteoporosis is a global health problem for ageing populations. The goals of osteoporosis treatment are to improve bone mineral density (BMD) and prevent fractures. One major obstacle that remains a great challenge to achieve the goals is how to select the best treatment regimen for individual patients. We developed a computational model from 8981 clinical variables, including demographic data, diagnoses, laboratory results, medications, and initial BMD results, taken from 10-year period of electronic medical records to predict BMD response after treatment. We trained 7 machine learning models with 13,562 osteoporosis treatment instances [comprising 5080 (37.46%) inadequate treatment responses and 8482 (62.54%) adequate responses] and selected the best model (Random Forests with area under the receiver operating curve of 0.70, accuracy of 0.69, precision of 0.70, and recall of 0.89) to individually predict treatment responses of 11 therapeutic regimens, then selected the best predicted regimen to compare with the actual regimen. The results showed that the average treatment response of the recommended regimens was 9.54% higher than the actual regimens. In summary, our novel approach using a machine learning-based decision support system is capable of predicting BMD response after osteoporosis treatment and personalising the most appropriate treatment regimen for an individual patient.

[Menopause, menopause hormone therapy and osteoporosis. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a frequent clinical condition, which affects nearly 1 in 3 women. Estrogen deficiency leads to rapid bone loss, which is maximal within the first years after the menopause transition and can be prevented by menopause hormone therapy (MHT). Assessment of the individual risk of osteoporosis is primarily based on the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and femur by DXA. Clinical risk factors (CRFs) for fractures taken either alone or in combination in the FRAX score were shown not to reliably predict fractures and/or osteoporosis (as defined by a T-score<-2.5) in early postmenopausal women. If DXA measurement is indicated in all women with CRFs for fractures, it can be proposed on a case-by-case basis, when knowledge of BMD is likely to condition the management of women at the beginning of menopause, particularly the benefit-risk balance of MHT. MHT prevents both bone loss and degradation of the bone microarchitecture in early menopause. It significantly reduces the risk of fracture at all bone sites by 20 to 40% regardless of basal level of risk with an estrogen-dependent dose-effect. Given the inter-individual variability in bone response, individual monitoring of the bone effect of MHT is warranted when prescribed for the prevention of osteoporosis. This monitoring is based on repeated measurement of lumbar and femoral BMD (on the same DXA measurement system) after 2years of MHT, the response criterion being no significant bone loss. Discontinuation of treatment is associated with a resumption of transient bone loss although there is a large variability in the rate of bone loss among women. Basically, there is a return to the level of fracture risk comparable to that of in untreated woman of the same age within 2 to 5years. Therefore, when MHT is prescribed for the prevention of osteoporosis in women with an increased risk at the beginning of menopause, measurement of BMD is recommended when MHT is stopped in order to consider further management of the risk of fracture whenever necessary (with possibly another anti-osteoporotic treatment).

Osteoporosis in Adult Patients with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Special Considerations for Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management

As medical care progresses, patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities are living longer and beginning to experience diseases that commonly afflict the aging population, such as osteoporosis. Osteoporosis and resultant fractures increase disability and threaten the independence of this vulnerable population. In addition, the diagnosis, prevention, and management of osteoporosis present unique challenges in these patients. Critical preventive targets include exercise modification, fall prevention, and monitoring for nutrient deficiencies. Commonly used in diagnosis and treatment monitoring, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of the hip and spine may not be feasible, whereas peripheral DXA or computed tomography may be more accessible for patients with physical disabilities. Pharmacological treatment should be tailored to the individual patient, considering factors such as adherence and comorbidities. Finally, bone turnover markers are a noninvasive, cost-effective option for monitoring treatment response in patients who cannot undergo DXA.

Operationalizing Treat-to-Target for Osteoporosis

Treat-to-target (TTT) for osteoporosis is a concept for individualizing patient treatment decisions that focuses on achieving an acceptable level of fracture risk rather than response to treatment alone. While a response to treatment is essential in order to achieve an acceptable level of risk, it is not necessarily sufficient. Some patients have a good response to treatment yet remain at high level of fracture risk. Since there is no way to directly measure bone strength in patients treated for osteoporosis, a surrogate measurement must be used. Bone mineral density (BMD) is commonly used to select patients for treatment and has emerged as the most useful surrogate for assessing reduction of fracture risk after treatment is started. Recent large meta-regression studies have shown a robust correlation between larger increases in BMD with treatment and greater reductions in fracture risk. Application of TTT for osteoporosis involves assessing fracture risk before starting treatment and initiating treatment with an agent that is most likely to reduce fracture risk to an acceptable level, represented by a target BMD T-score, over a reasonable period of time. This review offers suggestions for implementing TTT for osteoporosis in clinical practice and managing patients who fail or succeed in reaching the target. More study is needed to fully validate the use of TTT for osteoporosis for initiating and modifying treatments to reduce fracture risk.

Consensus evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treat-to-target management of osteoporosis in Africa: an initiative by the African Society of Bone Health and Metabolic Bone Diseases

The objective of this consensus statement is to inform the clinical practice communities, research centres and policymakers across Africa of the results of the recommendations for osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management. The developed guideline provides state-of-the-art information and presents the conclusions and recommendations of the consensus panel regarding these issues.

PURPOSE

To reach an African expert consensus on a treat-to-target strategy, based on current evidence for best practice, for the management of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures.

METHOD

A 3-round Delphi process was conducted with 17 osteoporosis experts from different African countries. All rounds were conducted online. In round 1, experts reviewed a list of 21 key clinical questions. In rounds 2 and 3, they rated the statements stratified under each domain for its fit (on a scale of 1-9). After each round, statements were retired, modified or added in view of the experts' suggestions and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7-9 by more than 75% of experts' votes were considered as achieving consensus.

RESULTS

The developed guidelines adopted a fracture risk-centric approach. Results of round 1 revealed that of the 21 proposed domains, 10 were accepted whereas 11 were amended. In round 2, 32 statements were presented: 2 statements were retired for similarity, 9 statements reached consensus, whereas modifications were suggested for 21 statements. After the 3rd round of rating, the experts came to consensus on the 32 statements. Frequency of high-rate recommendation ranged from 83.33 to 100%. The response rate of the experts was 100%. An algorithm for the osteoporosis management osteoporosis was suggested.

CONCLUSION

This study is an important step in setting up a standardised osteoporosis service across the continent. Building a single model that can be applied in standard practice across Africa will enable the clinicians to face the key challenges of managing osteoporosis; furthermore, it highlights the unmet needs for the policymakers responsible for providing bone health care together with and positive outcomes of patients' care.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2020 updated guideline contains 52 recommendations: 21 Grade A (40%), 24 Grade B (46%), 7 Grade C (14%), and no Grade D (0%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 368 citations: 123 (33.5%) evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 132 (36%) EL 2 (intermediate), 20 (5.5%) EL 3 (weak), and 93 (25%) EL 4 (lowest). New or updated topics in this CPG include: clarification of the diagnosis of osteoporosis, stratification of the patient according to high-risk and very-high-risk features, a new dual-action therapy option, and transitions from therapeutic options. Conclusion: This guideline is a practical tool for endocrinologists, physicians in general, regulatory bodies, health-related organizations, and interested laypersons regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. Abbreviations: 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AFF = atypical femoral fracture; ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BTM = bone turnover marker; CI = confidence interval; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CTX = C-terminal telopeptide type-I collagen; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration; FRAX® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; GI = gastrointestinal; HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic acid ONce yearly Pivotal Fracture Trial (zoledronic acid and zoledronate are equivalent terms); ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry; IU = international units; IV = intravenous; LSC = least significant change; NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation; ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw; PINP = serum amino-terminal propeptide of type-I collagen; PTH = parathyroid hormone; R = recommendation; ROI = region of interest; RR = relative risk; SD = standard deviation; TBS = trabecular bone score; VFA = vertebral fracture assessment; WHO = World Health Organization.

Investigation of Pyrophosphates KYP2O7Co-Doped with Lanthanide Ions Useful for Theranostics

Diphosphate compounds (KYP₂O₇) co-doped with Yb³⁺ and Er³⁺ ions were obtained by one step urea assisted combustion synthesis. The experimental parameters of synthesis were optimized using an experimental design approach related to co-dopants concentration and heattreatment as well as annealing time. The obtained materials were studied with theinitial requirements showing appropriate morphological (X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)) and spectroscopic properties (emission, luminescence kinetics). Moreover, the effect of Er³⁺ and Yb³⁺ ions doped KYP₂O₇ on morphology, proliferative and metabolic activity and apoptosis in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell line and 4B12osteoclasts cell line was investigated. Furthermore, the expression of the common pro-osteogenic markers in MC3T3-E1 osteoblast as well as osteoclastogenesis related markers in 4B12 osteoclasts was evaluated. The extensive in vitro studies showed that KYP₂O₇ doped with 1 mol% Er³⁺ and 20 mol% Yb³⁺ ions positively affected the MC3T3-E1 and 4B12 cells activity without triggering their apoptosis. Moreover, it was shown that an activation of mTOR and Pi3k signaling pathways with 1 mol% Er³⁺, 20 mol% Yb³⁺: KYP₂O₇ can promote the MC3T3-E1 cells expression of late osteogenic markers including RUNX and BMP-2. The obtained data shed a promising light for KYP₂O₇ doped with Er³⁺ and Yb³⁺ ions as a potential factors improving bone fracture healing as well as in bioimaging (so-called in theranostics).

Western Osteoporosis Alliance Clinical Practice Series: Treat-to-Target for Osteoporosis

Patients often start treatment to reduce fracture risk because of a bone mineral density T-score consistent with osteoporosis (≤ -2.5). Others with a T-score above -2.5 may be treated when there is a history of fragility fracture or when a fracture risk algorithm categorizes them as having a high risk for fracture. It is common to initiate therapy with a generic oral bisphosphonate, unless contraindicated, and continue therapy if the patient is responding as assessed by stability or an increase in bone mineral density. However, some patients may respond well to an oral bisphosphonate, yet remain with an unacceptably high risk for fracture. Recognition of this occurrence has led to the development of an alternative strategy: treat-to-target. This involves identifying a biological marker (treatment target) that represents an acceptable fracture risk and then initiating treatment with an agent likely to reach this target. If the patient is on a path to reaching the target with initial therapy, treatment is continued. If it appears the target will not be reached with initial therapy, treatment is changed to an agent more likely to achieve the goal.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS - 2016

ABBREVIATIONS

AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists AFF = atypical femur fracture ASBMR = American Society for Bone and Mineral Research BEL = best evidence level BMD = bone mineral density BTM = bone turnover marker CBC = complete blood count CI = confidence interval DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry EL = evidence level FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration FLEX = Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long-term Extension FRAX_® = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool GFR = glomerular filtration rate GI = gastrointestinal HORIZON = Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly IOF = International Osteoporosis Foundation ISCD = International Society for Clinical Densitometry IU = international units IV = intravenous LSC = least significant change NBHA = National Bone Health Alliance NOF = National Osteoporosis Foundation 25(OH)D = 25-hydroxy vitamin D ONJ = osteonecrosis of the jaw PINP = serum carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I collagen PTH = parathyroid hormone R = recommendation RANK = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B RANKL = receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand RCT = randomized controlled trial RR = relative risk S-CTX = serum C-terminal telopeptide SQ = subcutaneous VFA = vertebral fracture assessment WHO = World Health Organization.

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a literature-based algorithm for use in the public health care system

Bisphosphonates are considered first-line agents in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis based on extensive experience of use, safety, and proven efficacy in reducing vertebral, non-vertebral and femur fractures. However, post-marketing reports based on the treatment of millions of patients/year over lengthy periods of time have revealed the occurrence of initially unexpected adverse effects, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fracture, leading to the restriction of treatment duration with bisphosphonates by global regulatory agencies. However, despite the association between these effects and bisphosphonates, this risk should be analyzed in the context of osteoporosis treatment, alongside the benefit of preventing osteoporotic fractures and their clinical consequences. Therefore, we consider it plausible to discuss the restriction to the use of bisphosphonates, possible indications for prolonged treatment and alternative therapies following the suspension of this drug class for patients with persistent high risk of fracture after initial treatment, especially considering the problems of public health funding in Brazil and the shortage of drugs provided by the government. Thus, to standardize the treatment of osteoporosis in the public health care system, we aim to develop a proposal for a scientifically-based pharmacological treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis, establishing criteria for indication and allowing the rational use of each pharmacological agent. We discuss the duration of the initial bisphosphonate treatment, the therapeutic options for refractory patients and potential indications of other classes of drugs as first-choice treatment in the sphere of public health, in which assessing risk and cost effectiveness is a priority.

Osteoporosis: Treat-to-Target

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treat-to-target (goal-directed therapy) has been proposed as a strategy to assist clinicians in selecting the most appropriate initial treatment for osteoporosis and guiding subsequent decisions to continue, change, or stop treatment. This is a review of the current medical evidence regarding treatment targets and potential clinical applications in managing patients with osteoporosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Analyses of randomized placebo-controlled trials of approved agents to treat osteoporosis have generally shown that larger increases in bone mineral density are associated with greater reduction in fracture risk. Achievement of T-scores > -2.5 to -2.0 with treatment appears to provide little additional fracture protection. The paradigm of treat-to-target is aimed at enhancing and individualizing the care of patients with osteoporosis. Based on the best available data, the most promising target is T-score > -2.5. More data are needed to validate the clinical utility of treat-to-target for osteoporosis.

Relationship between baseline characteristics and response to risedronate treatment for osteoporosis: data from three Japanese phase III trials

We evaluated the influence of baseline age, bone mineral density (BMD), and serum levels of vitamin D on the response to risedronate treatment. Risedronate consistently increased BMD, but our results suggest vitamin D supplementation may be necessary to achieve optimal treatment effect. Furthermore, early intervention may help prevent bone fractures.

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the influence of baseline age, BMD, and vitamin D insufficiency on the response to risedronate treatment.

METHODS

Data regarding 1447 patients was obtained from the registries of three phase III clinical trials of risedronate. The response to treatment was expressed in terms of BMD increase and occurrence of new vertebral fractures. The patients were stratified by baseline values for age (<65, 65-72, and ≥72 years), lumbar spine BMD T-score (osteoporotic, <-2.5; and non-osteoporotic, ≥- 2.5), and serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (deficient, <21 ng/mL; and non-deficient, ≥21 ng/mL).

RESULTS

Risedronate consistently increased lumbar spine BMD in all the groups, with similar percentage and absolute increments in all the age tertiles. The percentage, but not absolute, increment in BMD was significantly higher (p = 0.0003) in the osteoporotic than that in the non-osteoporotic patients (baseline). Of the 1330 patients whose baseline serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were available, 44.7% had vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), while 89.2% had insufficiency (<30 ng/mL). The percentage and absolute increments in BMD were lower (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) in the vitamin D-deficient than those in the non-deficient patients. New vertebral fractures occurred in 1.5 and 0.8% of the osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients, respectively (end of the treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic response in elderly patients is consistent, but early initiation of risedronate treatment may help prevent fractures. Risedronate-induced increase in BMD is lower in patients with vitamin D deficiency, suggesting that vitamin D supplementation is important to achieve optimal treatment response.

Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) position statements on management of osteoporosis

The adjusted incidence rate of hip fracture in Thailand has increased more than 31% from 1997 to 2006. Mortality and morbidity after hip fracture are also high. One year mortality after a hip fracture has increased from 18% in 1999 to 21% in 2007. The Thai Osteoporosis Foundation (TOPF) developed the first Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) in 2002 and keeps updating the CPG since then. This latest version of the CPG is our attempt to provide comprehensive positional statement on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Thailand. The study group who revised this position statement contains experts from the TOPF, Four Royal Colleges of Thailand, includes the Orthopaedic Surgeons, Gynecologists and Obstetricians, Physiatrists, Radiologists and 2 Associations of Endocrinologists and Rheumatologists which have involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis.

Osteoporotic fracture rate among women with at least 1 year of adherence to osteoporosis treatment

PURPOSE

In clinical trials, bisphosphonate therapy reduces but does not eliminate the risk of fracture. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to examine fracture rates among women who were adherent to bisphosphonate therapy for at least 1 year.

METHODS

We studied outcomes for women ≥50 years old who received their first osteoporosis therapy as an oral bisphosphonate during 2002-2008 and were enrolled in a large claims database for ≥3 consecutive years, including a baseline year before and 2 years after the index prescription (thus, the full study period was 2001-2010). Adherence during the first year of therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio (MPR) ≥80% (total number of days' supply/365 days × 100%).

RESULTS

Of the 62,446 women who met the eligibility criteria, 26,852 (43%) had an MPR ≥80% for osteoporosis therapy during year 1. In year 2, the fracture rate was 52/1000 patient-years. Fragility fractures were recorded for 1292 patients (4.8%) during the baseline year (before initiating therapy); for 1051 patients (3.9%) during year 1 (adherence year); and for 871 patients (3.2%) during year 2. Significant predictors of fracture in year 2 were older age, higher comorbidity score, comorbid inflammatory joint disease, and prior fragility fracture during the baseline year or first year of treatment. The primary limitation of these results is the scope of the claims database, which did not provide information on bone mineral density, supplemental use of calcium or vitamin D, or reasons for initiating oral bisphosphonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being adherent to bisphosphonate treatment for 1 year, 3.2% of women experienced a fracture in the subsequent year. These results suggest an unmet need in patients with osteoporosis and an opportunity for newer therapies to help address this need.

The effects of bazedoxifene in the ovariectomized aged cynomolgus monkey

Bazedoxifene (BZA) is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This preclinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BZA in preventing ovariectomy (OVX)-induced bone loss in aged cynomolgus monkeys. Animals (18 per group) underwent OVX and were administered BZA (0.2, 0.5, 1, 5, or 25 mg/kg/day) or vehicle, or were sham-operated and administered vehicle, by daily oral gavage for 18 months. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months, along with bone densitometry using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Animals were killed after 18 months. Uterine and pituitary weights were determined, and histomorphometric and biomechanical measurements were performed. OVX vehicle controls showed increases in bone turnover associated with cancellous and cortical bone osteopenia (in vivo), and slight decreases (not statistically significant) in biomechanical strength parameters at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. BZA partially preserved cortical and cancellous bone mass by preventing the OVX-induced increases in bone turnover. Although the response was often similar among BZA-treated groups, the strongest efficacy was generally seen at 25 mg/kg/day. Treatment with BZA did not adversely affect measures of bone strength and was well tolerated; there was no evidence of uterotrophic activity, mammary tissue was unaffected, and there were no adverse effects on plasma lipids. Treatment of ovariectomized animals with BZA partially prevented changes in bone remodeling that correlated with increases in bone mineral density, while maintaining bone strength and a favorable safety profile.

Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: Can FRAX help assessing success or failure in achieving treatment goals?

AIM: To assess: (1) Whether the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) can be used for monitoring osteoporosis patients receiving treatment as well as its clinical implications; and (2) The relation between fracture incidence and post-treatment FRAX.

METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-nine osteoporotic women known to be adherent to the prescribed osteoporosis medication, had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan and fracture probability calculated at baseline, 2 and 5-year of osteoporosis treatment. Those patients who responded to treatment and did not sustain a new low trauma fracture during the first 2 years, continued their treatment and were re-assessed 3-year later. The patient subgroup who did not achieve an improvement in their bone mineral density (BMD) or sustain any fracture within the first 2-year, had their osteoporosis treatment changed. Outcome measures included BMD and FRAX assessment calculated 3-year after commencing new osteoporosis treatment.

RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between 10-year probability of major osteoporotic and hip fractures and BMD at the total proximal femur at 2-year of treatment (R = -0.449 and -0.479 respectively), and at 5-year (R = -0.489 and -0.594 respectively). At both 2 years and 5 years of treatment, the 10-year fracture probability showed significant correlation with the incidence of fracture (P < 0.01). On comparing fracture probability, there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the responders and non-responders to osteoporosis treatment.

CONCLUSION: In women currently or previously treated for osteoporosis, the FRAX tool can be used to predict fracture probability. Osteoporosis treatment does not annul prediction of fractures. FRAX tool may be of value in guiding clinicians towards the need for continuation or withdrawal of treatment.

Factors associated with bisphosphonate treatment failure in postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis

Among 97 postmenopausal women with primary osteoporosis, adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and good compliance to a 36-month bisphosphonate treatment, the 25.8% of patients are inadequate responders. Current smoking and a bone turnover in the upper part of the normal range increase the risk of treatment failure.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the prevalence of the bisphosphonate treatment failure and its possible associated factors in women with primary osteoporosis (PO).

METHODS

We studied 97 previously untreated postmenopausal women with PO and fragility fractures and/or a FRAX® 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture ≥ 7.5%, before and after a 36-month treatment with alendronate or risedronate and adequate vitamin D supplementation with good compliance. At baseline and after 36 months, lumbar spine (LS) and femoral bone mineral density (BMD) were assessed by Dual X-ray absorptiometry and vertebral fractures by spinal radiographs. Spinal deformity index (SDI) was calculated. Treatment failure was defined by the presence of ≥ 2 incident fragility fractures and/or a BMD decrease greater than the least significant change.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonate treatment failure was observed in 25.8% of patients. Age, body mass index, years since menopause, familiar history of hip fracture, number of falls, type of bisphosphonate used, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (25OHVitD), BMD, SDI, and FRAX® score at baseline were not different between responders and inadequate responders. Treatment failure was associated with current smoking (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.10-9.50, P = 0.034) and baseline alkaline phosphatase total activity levels ≥ 66.5 U/L (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.48-12.01, P = 0.007), regardless of age, number of falls, LS BMD, and baseline SDI.

CONCLUSIONS

The 25.8 % of PO postmenopausal women inadequately responds to bisphosphonates, despite a good compliance to therapy and normal 25OHVitD levels. The current smoking and bone turnover in the upper part of the normal range are associated with the inadequate response to bisphosphonates.

Characteristics associated with bone mineral density responses to alendronate in men

Some patients experience reduced bone mineral density (BMD) despite bisphosphonate therapy. We performed a retrospective chart review study to detect factors associated with decreased BMD in men prescribed alendronate. Two investigators reviewed eligible medical records and used a standardized form to record potential characteristics predicting men's response to alendronate. We analyzed patient characteristics associated with annualized change in hip and spine BMD (D-BMD). Among 115 eligible men, 19 (17 %) experienced significantly decreased BMD at the hip or spine, defined as a change exceeding precision error. Eleven men (10 %) fractured during therapy. Spine D-BMD was positively associated with adherence to alendronate (R = 0.23, p = 0.02) and inversely associated with baseline body weight (R = -0.21, p = 0.03). Hip D-BMD was positively associated with annualized weight change (R = 0.19, p = 0.0498) and negatively associated with patient age and number of concomitant medications (R = -0.21, p = 0.03; R = -0.20, p = 0.03, respectively). In stepwise linear models, spine D-BMD was associated positively with alendronate adherence and multivitamin use and negatively with baseline body weight. Hip D-BMD was negatively associated with age. Fracture during treatment was associated with fracture prior to therapy (p = 0.03). In this small study of men prescribed alendronate, BMD response showed a positive association with adherence to therapy, weight gain, and use of a multivitamin. By contrast, older age, higher baseline body weight, and higher number of medications were each associated with a decrease in BMD. Larger studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings.

Treat-to-target for osteoporosis: is now the time?

OBJECTIVES

Current clinical practice guidelines identify patients at high risk for fracture who are likely to benefit from pharmacological therapy and suggest ways to monitor for effectiveness of therapy. However, there is no clear guidance on when fracture risk has been reduced to an acceptably low level. As a consequence, some patients at low risk for fracture may be treated for longer than necessary, whereas others at high risk for fracture may have treatment stopped when they might benefit from continuation of the same treatment or a change to a more potent therapeutic agent. The objective of this statement is to describe the potential clinical utility of developing a "treat-to-target" strategy for the management of patients with osteoporosis.

PARTICIPANTS

We recommend that a task force of clinicians, clinical investigators, and other stakeholders in the care of osteoporosis explore the options, review the evidence, and identify additional areas for investigation to establish osteoporosis treatment targets.

EVIDENCE

Data from large, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled registration trials for currently available osteoporosis therapies should be analyzed for commonalities of correlations between easily measured endpoints and fracture risk.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Osteoporosis experts, professional organizations, and patient care advocates should be involved in the process of developing consensus on easily measurable osteoporosis treatment targets that are supported by the best available evidence and likely to be accepted by clinicians and patients in the care of osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A treat-to-target strategy for osteoporosis offers the potential of improving osteoporosis care by reducing the burden of osteoporotic fractures and limiting adverse effects of therapy.

Osteoporosis screening using areal bone mineral density estimation from diagnostic CT images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

A reliable and cost-effective method for osteoporosis screening is important in addressing the increase in osteoporotic fractures due to aging populations. Diagnostic computed tomographic (dCT) images may contain densitometric information useful for osteoporosis screening. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and volumetric information on dCT imaging and its suitability for building an osteopenia screening system. The goal of this system is to estimate aBMD and predict bone disease condition on the basis of dCT images of the lumbar spine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) aBMD and computed tomographic (CT) images were obtained from 44 male patients (mean age, 60 years). An aBMD from CT images (aBMD(CT)) was computed from the CT volume using established relationships of Hounsfield units to bone density and used to estimate DXA-derived aBMD (aBMD(DxA)). Estimated aBMD(CT) was then applied to diagnose osteopenia of the lumbar spine using statistical methods.

RESULTS

For the estimation of aBMD(DxA) from aBMD(CT), the proposed approach yielded a high correlation factor of r = 0.852, with a root mean square error of 0.0884 g/cm(2). The correlation was strongest when every slice in the dCT volume and both trabecular and cortical bone components were used. The classifier achieved an overall classification accuracy of 80.1% and an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.894.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical study demonstrates that aBMD(DxA) can be determined from routine CT data. Estimated aBMD(DxA) can be extended to form a dCT imaging-based opportunistic screening system for the detection and management of osteopenia.

Efficacy of intravenously administered ibandronate in postmenopausal Korean women with insufficient response to orally administered bisphosphonates

We investigated rates of insufficient and over-responsiveness to orally administered bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women, and tested the efficacy of intravenous ibandronate in patients with insufficient response to orally administered bisphosphonates. Postmenopausal women were treated with either alendronate (70 mg/week; n = 88) or risedronate (35 mg/week; n = 84) for 1 year, and their response to orally administered bisphosphonates was assessed using serum C-telopeptide (CTX) levels. Insufficient responders were changed to once-quarterly intravenous ibandronate 3 mg injection (n = 13) or maintained on orally administered bisphosphonates (n = 19), according to patients' preference, for an additional 1 year. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between two orally administered bisphosphonate groups except the bone mineral density values at the lumbar spine. Insufficient rate was higher in the risedronate group (19.0 %) than in the alendronate group (8.0 %), using the premenopausal serum CTX median as a cut-off (P = 0.043). The over-response rate among the alendronate group (59.1 %) was significantly higher than that in the risedronate group (38.1 %), based on a serum CTX cut-off value of 0.100 ng/ml (P = 0.006). Intravenous ibandronate suppressed serum CTX levels to a significantly greater degree at 7 days after the second dosing (0.191 ± 0.110 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and 3 months after the fourth dosing (0.274 ± 0.159 ng/mL; P = 0.004) among insufficient responders, compared with post-oral/pre-intravenous levels (0.450 ± 0.134 ng/mL). Rates of insufficient and over-responsiveness to orally administered bisphosphonates were considerable, and a change to intravenous bisphosphonates may be considered in patients showing an insufficient response to orally administered bisphosphonates.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice: new guidelines and concerns

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize recent policy and guideline updates that have significant consequences for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis and, thus, the prevention of fractures and associated morbidity and mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent policy trends have sought to reverse reimbursement declines for DXA services, whereas updated guidelines have attempted to restrict the candidates for bone density testing. Recent literature reflects the ongoing controversy of repeat DXA testing.

SUMMARY

Patient access to DXA scans has been threatened by declining reimbursement and, therefore, access to diagnosis and fracture prevention. There have been successful efforts to reverse this trend, but the future remains uncertain. The complexities and omissions of updated guidelines for obtaining DXA testing may serve again to restrict initial access, and the recent controversy of repeat DXA testing may make monitoring results of therapy more difficult.

Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal osteoporotic women

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease caused by a decrease in the bone mineral density. It is a major public health threat as it weakens bones, especially those in the wrist, spine, or hip, and causes them to break easily.

AIM

The study aimed to find how strictly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis adhere to a long-term therapy with bisphosphonates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted over a 24-month period. It included a total of 341 randomized patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis; the diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical and radiological evidence and a DXA T-score of the axial skeleton and the left hip less than -2.5 SD. Therapy included per os administration of alendonate 70 mg once a week or 50 mg of ibandronate once a month.

RESULTS

The patient medication persistence at the end of month 12 was 86.80%, and at the end of month 24 month - 58.94%. The medication possession ratio (MPR) in the bisphosphonate therapy at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months varied from 0.93 to 1.00. This suggests that there was a very good patient medication adherence of the study subjects to the 24-month treatment with bisphosphonates. The patient medication persistence dropped significantly at the end of month 12.

CONCLUSION

Compliance of patients with antiresorptive therapy depends on the specific socio-economic conditions and the attending physician's behaviour. Very rarely, treatment is discontinued because of adverse effects exerted by the drugs or because patients may not be convinced that they have osteoporosis.

Monitoring pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a common disease characterized by low bone strength that increases the risk of fractures. The consequences of fractures include increases in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Randomized clinical trials have shown that pharmacological therapy can reduce the risk of fractures. In clinical practice, however, failure to achieve optimal therapeutic benefit is common for reasons that include taking medication incorrectly, stopping it prematurely, malabsorption, and the presence of unrecognized diseases or conditions with adverse skeletal effects. Monitoring for anti-fracture effectiveness in individual patients is limited by the absence of clinical tools to directly measure bone strength. It is therefore necessary to monitor therapy with biomarkers such as bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. This is a review of the utility of these tools in the care of individual patients.

Risk communication and shared decision making in the care of patients with osteoporosis

Health maintenance and disease management require vigilance in assessing risk, communicating risk, and balancing the expected benefits of therapeutic interventions with potential harms. The evaluation of skeletal health includes identification of clinical risk factors for fracture, bone density testing in appropriate patients, and the use of validated algorithms for estimating the probability of fracture. To reduce the burden of osteoporotic fractures, patients at risk for fracture must be identified and treated with effective agents that are taken regularly, correctly, and for a sufficient length of time to achieve the desired benefit. These goals may be enhanced by shared decision making, a process by which the clinician and the patient share all applicable information and negotiate a plan of treatment that is acceptable to both. As an educator and a partner in making treatment decisions, the clinician must be familiar with the medical evidence and able to discuss complex medical information in a manner that is understood by the patient, with appropriate consideration of the patient's expectations, beliefs, and concerns. After treatment is started, risk communication, patient education, and shared decision making should be continued in an effort to maintain good compliance and persistence with therapy. Further study is needed to identify and validate optimal risk communication tools for the care of patients with osteoporosis. Challenges to shared decision making include competition from other health care priorities for limited patient encounter time during office visits, poor reimbursement, insufficient knowledge of the medical evidence, inadequate communication skills, and cognitive/affective disorders limiting patient participation in making treatment decisions.

Bone densitometry and vertebral fracture assessment

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is used to diagnose osteoporosis, assess fracture risk, and monitor response to therapy. Of the different methods for measuring BMD, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the only technology for classifying BMD according to criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the only technology that is validated for BMD input with the WHO fracture risk assessment algorithm, FRAX. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA provides an image of the thoracic and lumbar spine for the purpose of detecting vertebral fracture deformities. Identification of a previously unrecognized vertebral fracture may change diagnostic classification, assessment of fracture risk, and treatment decisions. In comparison with standard radiographs of the spine, the correlation for detecting moderate and severe vertebral fractures is good, with a smaller dose of ionizing irradiation, greater patient convenience, and lower cost. Optimal performance of DXA and VFA requires training and adherence to quality standards.

Bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis: insights for clinicians

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease characterized by a reduction in bone strength and increased risk of fractures. Osteoporotic fractures are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. Treatments for osteoporosis have been shown to increase bone strength and reduce fracture risk. The drugs most commonly used to treat osteoporosis are bisphosphonates: stable analogs of naturally occurring inorganic pyrophosphate. The bisphosphonates share a common chemical structure with side chain variations that convey differences in their pharmacological properties, such as affinity for bone mineral and inhibitory effect on osteoclastic bone resorption. The clinical profiles of bisphosphonates, such as time of onset and offset of effect, may differ according to these pharmacological properties. Bisphosphonates can be administered orally or intravenously with a wide range of doses and dosing intervals. Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown that bisphosphonates reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and have a generally excellent safety record. Clinical challenges in using bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis include appropriate selection of patients for initiating therapy, choosing which bisphosphonate to use, monitoring therapy to assure that medication is taken correctly and the desired effect is achieved, determining when drug discontinuation should be considered, and managing side effects, possible side effects, and fear of side effects. Strategies for treating patients with bisphosphonates should consider each of these issues.

Denosumab--an emerging treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Osteoporosis is a common skeletal disease that is associated with an imbalance in bone remodeling. Denosumab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL), a cytokine member of the TNF family that is the principal mediator of osteoclastic bone resorption.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The efficacy and safety of denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis is evaluated by reviewing the published literature and presentations at scientific meetings through 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review focuses on the data on fracture risk reduction and safety endpoints of denosumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab (60 mg by subcutaneous injection every 6 months) increased bone mineral density, reduced bone turnover markers, and reduced the risk of vertebral, hip and non-vertebral fractures. Denosumab was well tolerated with a safety profile generally similar to placebo. It is a promising emerging drug for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Benefits and limitations of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers to monitor patients treated for osteoporosis

Medications are approved by regulatory agencies for treating osteoporosis when at least one randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial shows a reduction in vertebral fracture risk and the benefit-risk ratio is determined to be acceptable. Subjects who participate in registration trials are a generally homogeneous group carefully screened with strict entry criteria. Individual patients who are treated for osteoporosis in clinical practice commonly differ from subjects enrolled in these clinical trials according to confounding factors that include age, sex, comorbidities, compliance, and persistence. Because the goal of therapy is reduction of fracture risk, and this cannot be directly assessed in an individual patient, biomarkers are commonly used as surrogate end points for effectiveness. This article reviews the clinical use and abuse of the two biomarkers most commonly used to assess the effectiveness of therapy in clinical practice: bone mineral density testing and measurement of markers of bone turnover.

Strategies for treatment to prevent fragility fractures in postmenopausal women

The objective of treatment of osteoporosis is to decrease the risk of fractures in patients at high risk for a first or subsequent fracture. The efficacy of treatment will depend on the efficiency and level of implementation of clinical case finding to select patients at risk, the results of additional investigations, the efficacy, tolerance and safety of medical intervention and the adherence to treatment during follow-up. Each of these steps is critical in treatment in daily practice. Failure to consider one or another step can result in suboptimal fracture prevention or overtreatment. The aim of case finding is to identify patients for treatment, who have disease characteristics of patients in whom fracture prevention has been demonstrated in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). These include patients with a low-trauma hip or vertebral fracture, with a low bone mineral density (BMD) or with a high risk of fracture based on the presence of clinical risk factors (CRFs) for osteoporosis and fractures such as included in the FRAX case-finding algorithm, with or without BMD. Case finding starts clinically, with systematic or opportunistic doctor- and/or patient-driven evaluation for the presence of CRFs, but its implementation is low. Further investigations aim to assess the risk of fracture(s) and to have baseline measurements for the subsequent monitoring of treatment, to exclude diseases that mimic osteoporosis, to identify the cause of osteoporosis and contributory factors and to select the most appropriate treatment. Medical intervention consists of providing information about osteoporosis to the patient, lifestyle advice, optimalisation of calcium intake and vitamin D status, fall prevention to reduce fall risk, correction of reversible contributors to secondary osteoporosis and a wide array of drugs for prevention of a first or subsequent vertebral, hip and non-vertebral, non-hip fracture. Drug treatment is based on manipulation of bone remodelling by inhibiting bone resorption (bisphosphonates, selective oestrogen-receptor modulator (SERMs), calcitonin), stimulating bone formation (parathyroid hormone) or mixed effects (strontium ranelate). Follow-up allows to check tolerance and safety, to optimise adherence and to decide about adequacy of response, duration and switching of therapy.

Management of osteoporosis in central and eastern Europe (CEE): conclusions of the "2nd Summit on Osteoporosis-CEE", 21-22 November 2008, Warsaw, Poland

In November 2008, the "2nd Summit on Osteoporosis-Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)" was held in Warsaw, Poland. Discussions at this meeting focused on the identification and discussion of diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic measures used in CEE. Evaluated information was used to identify issues regarding diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis in these countries to facilitate the subsequent setup of appropriate support and development strategies. The main debate was structured according to the following five subjects: (1) present status and future perspectives for implementation of FRAX(R) into local (CEE) diagnostic algorithms, (2) principles of drug selection in osteoporosis treatment in CEE countries, (3) nonpharmacological interventions in osteoporosis treatment and prophylaxis in CEE countries, (4) treatment benefit evaluation, and (5) cost-effectiveness and evaluation of reimbursement policies in CEE countries. The most important and substantial comments of the delegates are summarized in the present article. The multinational panel of experts with representatives from many CEE countries as well as Austria and Switzerland made the "2nd Summit on Osteoporosis-CEE" a perfect platform to identify issues and needs regarding diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis as well as the cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis management in CEE countries. The information gained will serve as a basis for the development of strategies to resolve the identified issues at the "3rd Summit on Osteoporosis-CEE" in November 2009.

2008 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: update on osteoporosis

The Ninth Annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held on August 1-2, 2008, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. The symposium faculty presented the current best evidence on selected topics of clinical relevance in the fields of osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease, and assessment of skeletal health. The educational venues were in the form of didactic presentations, panel discussions, challenging cases, and numerous interactive discussions. Knowledge of basic science and clinical trials was applied to real-world patient scenarios that were discussed by faculty experts and clinician participants. Topics included an update on the rationale and development of new agents for the treatment of osteoporosis, the use of bone turnover markers in clinical practice, hospital-based pathways for the management of hip fracture patients, injectable bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis, combination therapy with anabolic and antiresorptive agents, and assessment of skeletal health with devices other than central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. This is a collection of scientific essays based on presentations and discussions at the 2008 Santa Fe Bone Symposium.

Anti-resorptives in the management of osteoporosis

Bone-active agents that decrease bone turnover (the anti-resorptive agents) have been, to date, the most thoroughly studied pharmacological agents for the management of osteoporosis in a variety of populations - postmenopausal, male, and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis - and have received both Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) as well as other worldwide registrations for the management of these conditions. While the mechanisms of action of 'anti-resorptives' as a class differ, their effect on increasing bone strength and reducing the risk of fragility fractures share common pathways: an increase in bone mineral content, and a reduction in bone turnover. Within the category of anti-resorptives: estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tibolone, calcitonin, bisphosphonates and denosumab all reduce vertebral fractures risk, but differ in their ability to reduce the risk of non-vertebral fractures in randomized clinical trials. This chapter will discuss the data on these effects for each class of anti-resorptive agent.