Long-term cancer surveillance: results from the Forteo Patient Registry Surveillance Study

Bone health and menopause: Osteoporosis prevention and treatment

A continuous process of bone turnover is central to bone health and strength. If bone resorption exceeds bone formation, bone strength deteriorates with resultant fractures. Osteoporosis is defined by a fracture or bone mineral density. The lack of ovarian estrogen after menopause causes a significant loss in bone strength, placing women at higher risk of osteoporosis. The probability of future fractures can be calculated by identifying risk factors in all menopausal women. Preventive action starts with a bone-friendly lifestyle. The need for and type of interventive medication can best be determined by classifying fracture risk as low, high, or very high using a combination of fracture history, bone mineral density, 10-year fracture probability or country-specific values. As osteoporosis is an incurable disease, treatment should be seen as a lifelong strategy consisting of the correct sequencing of available bone-specific drugs and appropriate drug-free periods when applicable.

The Risk of Developing Osteosarcoma After Teriparatide Use: A Systematic Review

Teriparatide is a recombinant human parathyroid hormone analog with anabolic mechanism of action utilized in the treatment of osteoporosis with well-established clinical efficacy. Its use is significantly hindered due to label warnings resulting from pre-clinical rat studies demonstrating an increased risk of osteosarcoma. However, clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance studies did not demonstrate any increased risk of osteosarcoma, even after prolonged periods of surveillance reaching up to 15 years, with most of the identified cases of osteosarcomas being solitary and predominantly attributed to other factors. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the currently available literature and provides the highest level of clinical evidence towards demonstrating the lack of any substantial evidence towards osteosarcoma development in patients utilizing TPTD.

Real-world evidence: new opportunities for osteoporosis research. Recommendations from a Working Group from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO)

This narrative review summarises the recommendations of a Working Group of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) for the conduct and reporting of real-world evidence studies with a focus on osteoporosis research.

PURPOSE

Vast amounts of data are routinely generated at every healthcare contact and activity, and there is increasing recognition that these real-world data can be analysed to generate scientific evidence. Real-world evidence (RWE) is increasingly used to delineate the natural history of disease, assess real-life drug effectiveness, understand adverse events and in health economic analysis. The aim of this work was to understand the benefits and limitations of this type of data and outline approaches to ensure that transparent and high-quality evidence is generated.

METHODS

A ESCEO Working Group was convened in December 2022 to discuss the applicability of RWE to osteoporosis research and approaches to best practice.

RESULTS

This narrative review summarises the agreed recommendations for the conduct and reporting of RWE studies with a focus on osteoporosis research.

CONCLUSIONS

It is imperative that research using real-world data is conducted to the highest standards with close attention to limitations and biases of these data, and with transparency at all stages of study design, data acquisition and curation, analysis and reporting to increase the trustworthiness of RWE study findings.

Effect of teriparatide on drug treatment of tuberculous spondylitis: an experimental study

Tuberculous spondylitis often develops catastrophic bone destruction with uncontrolled inflammation. Because anti-tuberculous drugs do not have a role in bone formation, a combination drug therapy with a bone anabolic agent could help in fracture prevention and promote bone reconstruction. This study aimed to investigate the influence of teriparatide on the effect of anti-tuberculous drugs in tuberculous spondylitis treatment. We used the virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) H37Rv strain. First, we investigated the interaction between teriparatide and anti-tuberculosis drugs (isoniazid and rifampin) by measuring the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against H37Rv. Second, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of anti-tuberculosis drugs and teriparatide on our previously developed in vitro tuberculous spondylitis model of an Mtb-infected MG-63 osteoblastic cell line using acid-fast bacilli staining and colony-forming unit counts. Selected chemokines (interleukin [IL]-8, interferon γ-induced protein 10 kDa [IP-10], monocyte chemoattractant protein [MCP]-1, and regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted [RANTES]) and osteoblast proliferation (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and alizarin red S [ARS] staining) were measured. Teriparatide did not affect the MIC of isoniazid and rifampin. In the Mtb-infected MG-63 spondylitis model, isoniazid and rifampin treatment significantly reduced Mtb growth, and cotreatment with teriparatide did not change the anti-tuberculosis effect of isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RFP). IP-10 and RANTES levels were significantly increased by Mtb infection, whereas teriparatide did not affect all chemokine levels as inflammatory markers. ALP and ARS staining indicated that teriparatide promoted osteoblastic function even with Mtb infection. Cotreatment with teriparatide and the anti-tuberculosis drugs activated bone formation (ALP-positive area increased by 705%, P = 0.0031). Teriparatide was effective against Mtb-infected MG63 cells without the anti-tuberculosis drugs (ARS-positive area increased by 326%, P = 0.0037). Teriparatide had no effect on the efficacy of anti-tuberculosis drugs and no adverse effect on the activity of Mtb infection in osteoblasts. Furthermore, regulation of representative osteoblastic inflammatory chemokines was not changed by teriparatide treatment. In the in vitro Mtb-infected MG-63 cell model of tuberculous spondylitis, cotreatment with the anti-tuberculosis drugs and teriparatide increased osteoblastic function.

Parathyroid Hormone Therapy for Managing Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The efficacy and safety of parathyroid hormone (PTH) therapy for managing long-term hypoparathyroidism is being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available randomized controlled trials to investigate the benefits and harms of PTH therapy and conventional therapy in the management of patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism. To identify eligible studies, published in English, we searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to May 2022. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We defined patients' important outcomes and used grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) to provide the structure for quantifying absolute effects and rating the quality of evidence. Seven randomized trials of 12 publications that enrolled a total of 386 patients proved eligible. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 36 months. Compared with conventional therapy, PTH therapy probably achieves a small improvement in physical health-related quality of life (mean difference [MD] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.3, minimally important difference 3.0, moderate certainty). PTH therapy results in more patients reaching 50% or greater reduction in the dose of active vitamin D and calcium (relative risk [RR] = 6.5, 95% CI 2.5-16.4, 385 more per 1000 patients, high certainty). PTH therapy may increase hypercalcemia (RR =2.4, 95% CI 1.2-5.04, low certainty). The findings may support the use of PTH therapy in patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism. Because of limitations of short duration and small sample size, evidence from randomized trials is limited regarding important benefits of PTH therapy compared with conventional therapy. Establishing such benefits will require further studies. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Teriparatide and osteosarcoma risk: history, science, elimination of boxed warning, and other label updates

The phase 3 trials of the bone anabolic drug teriparatide were prematurely terminated because of a preclinical finding of osteosarcoma in rats treated with high doses of teriparatide for near lifetime. Even so, results from these and subsequent clinical trials showed efficacy and tolerability. Based on the phase 3 results and additional preclinical investigations, Forteo (teriparatide) was approved for use in the United States with an indication for the treatment of osteoporosis in patients at high risk for fracture, a boxed warning regarding potential risk of osteosarcoma, a 2‐year lifetime limitation of use, other risk mitigations, and a requirement to assess for risk of osteosarcoma in humans treated with teriparatide. Subsequent investigations included five real‐world studies directed at assessing a connection between teriparatide and osteosarcoma risk in humans. The early studies did not identify an increased risk of osteosarcoma but were inadequate to sufficiently characterize risk, given the low incidence of this rare form of bone cancer. Learning from these efforts, two studies were undertaken using claims data to identify large cohorts of patients treated with teriparatide and assess whether these patients were found to have osteosarcoma by linking pharmacy claims data with data from cancer registries. These studies showed no increase in osteosarcoma in patients using teriparatide compared with unexposed groups, as well as to the expected population‐based background incidence of the disease. Based on this real‐world evidence and the totality of data collected from postmarketing use and other clinical investigations, the label was updated in 2020. The changes included addition of information from large observational studies using real‐world evidence, removal of the boxed warning, and a revision of the 2‐year lifetime limitation. Thus, observational studies with large sample sizes using real‐world data can provide supportive evidence to facilitate regulatory decisions including the elimination of a boxed warning. © 2022 Eli Lilly and Company. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Assessing the incidence of osteosarcoma among teriparatide-treated patients using linkage of commercial pharmacy and state cancer registry data, contributing to the removal of boxed warning and other labeling changes

BACKGROUND

Teriparatide, a recombinant human parathyroid hormone analogue, is associated with increased bone mineral density and a decreased risk of fractures. A dose-dependent increase in the incidence of osteosarcoma was observed in toxicology studies conducted in rats. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of osteosarcoma over a 10-year period among teriparatide-treated patients versus patients unexposed to teriparatide with osteoporosis and patients in the general population using national pharmacy dispensing data linked with data from participating state cancer registries (SCRs) in the US.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older with a dispensed teriparatide prescription formed two different cohorts: Teriparatide-Osteoporosis (Teriparatide-OP) was formed by matching teriparatide patients to unexposed patients with osteoporosis and Teriparatide-General Population (Teriparatide-GP) was formed by matching teriparatide patients to general population patients with a dispensed prescription for a medication other than teriparatide. Matching was performed using select demographics and other variables. Study cohorts were linked to SCR data to ascertain osteosarcoma status. To account for missing outcome data from non-participating SCRs, two analytic approaches were used: the first adjusted the person-time at-risk using a coverage fraction and the second restricted the analyses to patients from states with participating SCRs.

RESULTS

There were 18 osteosarcoma cases across four study cohorts: the same three cases in the Teriparatide-OP and Teriparatide-GP cohorts, six cases in the Osteoporosis cohort, and nine cases in the General Population cohort. For the analysis using the coverage fraction the incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing the Teriparatide-OP and Teriparatide-GP cohorts to the Osteoporosis and General Population cohorts was 1.0 (95% CI: 0.2, 4.5) and 1.3 (95% CI: 0.2, 5.1), respectively. When restricting the analysis to patients from states with participating SCRs, the IRR was 0.6 (95% CI: 0.1, 3.6) and 0.8 (95% CI 0.1, 4.0), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The estimates of association between teriparatide and osteosarcoma were imprecise due to the small number of observed osteosarcoma cases. However, the incidence of osteosarcoma observed in each study cohort was within the expected range given background rates for the US general population. The evidence generated by this study, in conjunction with other real-world studies evaluating the risk of osteosarcoma, was used to support changes to the US teriparatide label (including removal of the black box warning regarding potential risk of osteosarcoma) and expand treatment options for patients with osteoporosis.

Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: 2021 Position Statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Antiresorptives are the most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis. They are also used in malignant bone metastases, multiple myeloma, and Paget's disease, and provide therapeutic efficacy on those diseases. However, it was reported that the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) could be related to antiresorptive exposures, and there have been many cases regarding this issue. Therefore, a clearer definition and treatment guidelines were needed for this disease. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Amnerican Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons reported statements on bisphosphonate-related ONJ (BRONJ), and a revised version was recently presented. In the revised edition, the diagnosis BRONJ was changed to medication-related ONJ (MRONJ), which reflects consideration of the fact that ONJ also occurs for denosumab, a bone resorption inhibitor of the receptor activator of the nuclear factor-κB ligand antibody family, and bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenesis inhibitor. The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research and the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons had collectively formed a task force for the preparation of an official statement on MRONJ based on a previous position paper in 2015. The task force reviewed current knowledge and coordinated dental and medical opinions to propose the guideline customized for the local Korean situation.

Teriparatide in individuals with a prior history of radiation therapy-a case series

PURPOSE

Teriparatide is a highly effective anabolic therapy for use in patients with osteoporosis at elevated fracture risk but carries a warning about an increased risk of osteosarcoma based on findings from pre-approval animal studies. Since approval, follow-up of individuals treated with teriparatide has not shown an increased risk of osteosarcoma, but it is still recommended to avoid teriparatide in patients with risk factors for osteosarcoma. One such risk factor is radiotherapy; deciding whether to use teriparatide therapy in patients at high risk of fracture but with a history of radiotherapy is therefore a frequent clinical problem.

METHODS

We sought to identify whether clinicians are using teriparatide in patients with a history of radiotherapy despite the warning and to explore the rationale for this choice. Herein, we describe six cases where the likelihood of fracture, osteosarcoma, and the benefits of teriparatide treatment are assessed to determine the appropriateness of prescribing teriparatide in the setting of prior or concurrent radiotherapy.

RESULTS

All six patients had severe osteoporosis with limited treatment options. For those who completed 2 years of teriparatide, no further fractures during the follow-up period have occurred, and improvements in bone density (as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Despite radiotherapy being a relative contraindication to teriparatide use, there may be a role for teriparatide in select cases where osteoporosis is complex and severe and where other treatment options are not suitable or have been exhausted. The risks vs. benefits of prescribing teriparatide in this population should always be carefully considered, and both the patient and treating oncologist should be educated on the potential risk of osteosarcoma development when teriparatide is continued during radiotherapy.

Review of Current Real-World Experience with Teriparatide as Treatment of Osteoporosis in Different Patient Groups

Teriparatide has proven effective in reducing both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in clinical trials of post-menopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Widespread adoption of Teriparatide over the last two decades means that there is now substantial experience of its use in routine clinical practice, which is summarized in this paper. Extensive real-world experience of Teriparatide in post-menopausal osteoporosis confirms the fracture and bone density benefits seen in clinical trials, with similar outcomes identified also in male and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Conversely, very limited experience has been reported in pre-menopausal osteoporosis or in the use of Teriparatide in combination with other therapies. Surveillance studies have identified no safety signals relating to the possible association of Teriparatide with osteosarcoma. We also review the evidence for predicting response to Teriparatide in order to inform the debate on where best to use Teriparatide in an increasingly crowded therapeutic landscape.