Rebound responding following a single dose of drug using an amphetamine-vehicle-haloperidol drug discrimination

The discriminative stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists in rats

RATIONALE

Previous research has found the stimulus effects of dopamine D2- and D3-preferring agonists difficult to distinguish in drug discrimination studies. Antagonism studies suggest that the stimulus effects of both types of agonists may be mediated primarily through D2 receptors.

OBJECTIVES

The current study was designed to further assess the receptors mediating the stimulus effects of these agonists and to attempt to train rats to discriminate directly between D2- and D3-preferring dopamine agonists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four groups of eight rats were trained to discriminate either 0.1 mg/kg of the D3-preferring agonist pramipexole from saline, 1.0 mg/kg of the D2-preferring agonist sumanirole from saline, 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole from either saline or 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole, or 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole from either saline or 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole.

RESULTS

Three of eight rats in the 0.1 mg/kg pramipexole vs. 1.0 mg/kg sumanirole or saline failed to meet the training criteria, and the discrimination in this group was tenuous. The D2-preferring antagonist L-741,626 at 1.0 mg/kg was more effective at shifting to the right the pramipexole dose-response curve in pramipexole-trained rats, while 32 mg/kg of the selective D3 antagonist PG01037 had little effect. Quinpirole and 7-OH-DPAT fully or partially substituted for both pramipexole and sumanirole in each group tested, while cocaine did not substitute in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Antagonist data along with the pattern of training and substitution data suggested that D2 receptor activation is primarily responsible for the stimulus effects of both sumanirole and pramipexole with D3 receptor activation playing little or no role.

Time-dependent effects of amphetamine on feeding in rats

Following administration of a moderate dose of amphetamine, rats appear to pass through a sequence of physiological/psychological states, including stimulant and depressant states. The present research evaluated whether these states could be inferred from time-dependent changes in feeding-related measures. Male rats were housed in individual stations (light-dark 12-12 h, free access to water) where, at 3-h intervals, they could respond for food for 1 h. The work requirement was fixed ratio 1, and each lever press produced six 94-mg food pellets. When the pattern of responding for food stabilized across the light-dark cycle, a series of 6 or 7 tests was run. During each test, rats received a saline treatment (1.0 ml/kg, subcutaneously) followed by a 48-h monitoring period, and then they received an amphetamine treatment (2.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously) followed by a 72-h monitoring period. Different groups were treated at either light onset or light offset. Lever presses and head-in-feeding-bin responses were monitored throughout these tests. Administration of amphetamine at light onset and at light offset produced cumulative food intake functions having four regions: post-treatment hours 1-6 (hypophagia), 7-12 (normal intake), 13-27 (hypophagia), and 28 and beyond (normal intake). The sequence, duration, and quality of the amphetamine-induced changes in food intake resembled those formerly seen in cue state and activity, and provided further evidence of a transient withdrawal state 20-24 h post-amphetamine treatment.

An activity indicator of acute withdrawal depends on amphetamine dose in rats

A moderate dose of amphetamine (AMPH) produces hypoactivity around 20 h post-administration. This hypoactivity may be an indicator of an acute withdrawal state. The purpose was to see how AMPH doses affected the expression of this hypoactivity and, by inference, AMPH-induced acute withdrawal. Rats were housed in individual open fields, with free access to food and water. Light-dark cycles were scheduled such that drug-elicited patterns could be readily detected. Animals first received a series of eight control treatments, and then a series of 10 experimental treatments spaced at 33-h intervals. Different experimental treatment groups received saline, 1.0 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg, or 4.0 mg/kg AMPH. The effects of these treatments on 33-h patterns of locomotor activity were observed. Control treatments produced no systematic time-dependent changes in activity beyond the first hour post-treatment. All doses of AMPH produced typical short-term effects: They markedly increased locomotion and/or stereotypy during the first 3 to 6 h post-treatment. Acute and chronic administrations of the 2.0 and 4.0 mg/kg doses also produced similar changes in longer term activity patterns: They produced hypoactivity 20 h later, followed by a recovery of activity around hour 25 post-treatment. The timing of amphetamine-induced hypoactivity and acute withdrawal may be independent of dose over a wide range of doses. Time-dependent changes in AMPH-induced state may influence motivation and drug-related assessments. The methodology described here may provide an easy and rapid way to investigate the determinants of AMPH-induced hypoactivity and acute withdrawal.

Effects of training dose on amphetamine drug discrimination: dose-response functions and generalization to cocaine

Rats were trained to discriminate one of three doses of amphetamine (AM), 0.5, 1, or 2 mg/kg, from vehicle (VEH) in a two-lever, food-reinforced, drug-discrimination task. The purpose of the study was to investigate the nature of the shift of the dose-response curve and generalization to cocaine (COC) as a function of training dose. In order to preclude potential differences among the groups in stimulus control, the three training-dose groups were required to perform the discrimination at high and equivalent levels of accuracy. The shift of the dose-response functions to the right as a function of increasing training dose was not parallel. The slope decreased as training dose increased. There was a dose-dependent increase in AM lever responding to test doses of COC that tended to be affected by training dose. The results suggest that proper evaluation of training-dose effects requires that groups be trained to equivalent levels of stimulus control.