Five years of treatment with risedronate and its effects on bone safety in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Alendronate prolongs the reversal-resorption phase in human cortical bone remodeling

Despite their ability to reduce fracture-risk and increase Bone Mineral Density (BMD) in osteoporotic women, bisphosphonates are reported to reduce formation of new bone. Reduced bone formation has been suggested to lead to accumulation of microfractures and contribute to rare side effects in cortical bone such as atypical femur fractures. However, most studies are limited to trabecular bone. In this study, the cortical bone remodeling in human iliac bone specimens of 65 non-treated and 24 alendronate-treated osteoporotic women was investigated using a new histomorphometric classification of intracortical pores. The study showed that only 12.4 ± 11% of the cortical pore area reflected quiescent pores/osteons in alendronate-treated patients versus 8.5 ± 5% in placebo, highlighting that new cortical remodeling events remain to be activated. The percent and size of eroded pores (events in resorption-reversal phase) remained unchanged, but their contribution to total pore area was 1.4-fold higher in alendronate versus placebo treated patients (66 ± 22% vs 48 ± 22%, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the mixed eroded-formative pores (events with mixed resorption-reversal-formation phases) was 2-fold lower in alendronate versus placebo treated patients (19 ± 14% vs 39 ± 23% of total pore area, p < 0.001), and formative pores (event in formation phase) was 2.2-fold lower in alendronate versus placebo treated patients (2.1 ± 2.4% vs 4.6 ± 3.6%, p < 0.01), and their contribution to total pore area was 2.4-fold lower (1.3 ± 2.1% vs 3.1 ± 4.4%, p < 0.05). Importantly, these differences between alendronate and placebo treated patients were significant in patients after 3 years of treatment, not after 2 years of treatment. Collectively, the results support that cortical remodeling events activated during alendronate treatment has a prolonged reversal-resorption phase with a delayed transition to formation, becoming increasingly evident after 3-years of treatment. A potential contributor to atypical femur fractures associated with long-term bisphosphonate treatment.

Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Risedronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts. This is an update of a Cochrane Review that was originally published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures for postmenopausal women at lower and higher risk for fractures, respectively.

SEARCH METHODS

With broader and updated strategies, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase. A grey literature search, including the online databases ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and drug approval agencies, as well as bibliography checks of relevant systematic reviews was also performed. Eligible trials published between 1966 to 24 March 2021 were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that assessed the benefits and harms of risedronate in the prevention of fractures for postmenopausal women. Participants must have received at least one year of risedronate, placebo or other anti-osteoporotic drugs, with or without concurrent calcium/vitamin D. Major outcomes were clinical vertebral, non-vertebral, hip and wrist fractures, withdrawals due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. In the interest of clinical relevance and applicability, we classified a study as secondary prevention if its population fulfilled more than one of the following hierarchical criteria: a diagnosis of osteoporosis, a history of vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD)T score ≤ -2.5, and age ≥ 75 years old. If none of these criteria was met, the study was considered to be primary prevention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. We pooled the relative risk (RR) of fractures using a fixed-effect model based on the expectation that the clinical and methodological characteristics of the respective primary and secondary prevention studies would be homogeneous, and the experience from the previous review suggesting that there would be a small number of studies. The base case included the data available for the longest treatment period in each placebo-controlled trial and a >15% relative change was considered clinically important. The main findings of the review were presented in summary of findings tables, using the GRADE approach. In addition, we looked at benefit and harm comparisons between different dosage regimens for risedronate and between risedronate and other anti-osteoporotic drugs.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-three trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria, among which 33 studies (27,348 participants) reported data that could be extracted and quantitatively synthesized. We had concerns about particular domains of risk of bias in each trial. Selection bias was the most frequent concern, with only 24% of the studies describing appropriate methods for both sequence generation and allocation concealment. Fifty per cent and 39% of the studies reporting benefit and harm outcomes, respectively, were subject to high risk. None of the studies included in the quantitative syntheses were judged to be at low risk of bias in all seven domains. The results described below pertain to the comparisons for daily risedronate 5 mg versus placebo which reported major outcomes. Other comparisons are described in the full text. For primary prevention, low- to very low-certainty evidence was collected from four studies (one to two years in length) including 989 postmenopausal women at lower risk of fractures. Risedronate 5 mg/day may make little or no difference to wrist fractures [RR 0.48 ( 95% CI 0.03 to 7.50; two studies, 243 participants); absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.6% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 7% more)] and withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.67 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.18; three studies, 748 participants); ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 5% fewer to 1% more)], based on low-certainty evidence. However, its preventive effects on non-vertebral fractures and serious adverse events are not known due to the very low-certainty evidence. There were zero clinical vertebral and hip fractures reported therefore the effects of risedronate for these outcomes are not estimable.  For secondary prevention, nine studies (one to three years in length) including 14,354 postmenopausal women at higher risk of fractures provided evidence. Risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fractures [RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.90; six studies, 12,173 participants); RRR 20% (95% CI 10% to 28%) and ARR 2% fewer (95% CI 1% fewer to 3% fewer), moderate certainty], and may reduce hip fractures [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.94); RRR 27% (95% CI 6% to 44%) and ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 0.2% fewer to 1% fewer), low certainty]. Both of these effects are probably clinically important. However, risedronate's effects are not known for wrist fractures [RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.24); three studies,1746 participants); ARR 1% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more), very-low certainty] and not estimable for clinical vertebral fractures due to zero events reported (low certainty). Risedronate results in little to no difference in withdrawals due to adverse events [RR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; eight studies, 9529 participants); ARR 0.3% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 1% more); 16.9% in risedronate versus 17.2% in control, high certainty] and probably results in little to no difference in serious adverse events [RR 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.07; six studies, 9435 participants); ARR 0% fewer (95% CI 2% fewer to 2% more; 29.2% in both groups, moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update recaps the key findings from our previous review that, for secondary prevention, risedronate 5 mg/day probably prevents non-vertebral fracture, and may reduce the risk of hip fractures. We are uncertain on whether risedronate 5mg/day reduces clinical vertebral and wrist fractures.  Compared to placebo, risedronate probably does not increase the risk of serious adverse events.  For primary prevention, the benefit and harms of risedronate were supported by limited evidence with high uncertainty.

Bisphosphonates impair the onset of bone formation at remodeling sites

Bisphosphonates are widely used anti-osteoporotic drugs targeting osteoclasts. They strongly inhibit bone resorption, but also strongly reduce bone formation. This reduced formation is commonly ascribed to the mechanism maintaining the resorption/formation balance during remodeling. The present study provides evidence for an additional mechanism where bisphosphonates actually impair the onset of bone formation after resorption. The evidence is based on morphometric parameters recently developed to assess the activities reversing resorption to formation. Herein, we compare these parameters in cancellous bone of alendronate- and placebo-treated postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Alendronate increases the prevalence of eroded surfaces characterized by reversal cells/osteoprogenitors at low cell density and remote from active bone surfaces. This indicates deficient cell expansion on eroded surfaces - an event that is indispensable to start formation. Furthermore, alendronate decreases the coverage of these eroded surfaces by remodeling compartment canopies, a putative source of reversal cells/osteoprogenitors. Finally, alendronate strongly decreases the activation frequency of bone formation, and decreases more the formative compared to the eroded surfaces. All these parameters correlate with each other. These observations lead to a model where bisphosphonates hamper the osteoprogenitor recruitment required to initiate bone formation. This effect results in a larger eroded surface, thereby explaining the well-known paradox that bisphosphonates strongly inhibit bone resorption without strongly decreasing eroded surfaces. The possible mechanism for hampered osteoprogenitor recruitment is discussed: bisphosphonates may decrease the release of osteogenic factors by the osteoclasts, and/or bisphosphonates released by osteoclasts may act directly on neighboring osteoprogenitor cells as reported in preclinical studies.

Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of non-bisphosphonates {denosumab [Prolia®; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA], raloxifene [Evista®; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan], romosozumab [Evenity®; Union Chimique Belge (UCB) S.A. (Brussels, Belgium) and Amgen Inc.] and teriparatide [Forsteo®; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA]}, compared with each other, bisphosphonates or no treatment, for the prevention of fragility fracture.

DATA SOURCES

For the clinical effectiveness review, nine electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched up to July 2018.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of fracture and femoral neck bone mineral density were conducted. A review of published economic analyses was undertaken and a model previously used to evaluate bisphosphonates was adapted. Discrete event simulation was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years for a simulated cohort of patients with heterogeneous characteristics. This was done for each non-bisphosphonate treatment, a strategy of no treatment, and the five bisphosphonate treatments previously evaluated. The model was populated with effectiveness evidence from the systematic review and network meta-analysis. All other parameters were estimated from published sources. An NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was taken, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Fracture risk was estimated from patient characteristics using the QFracture® (QFracture-2012 open source revision 38, Clinrisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and FRAX® (web version 3.9, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK) tools. The relationship between fracture risk and incremental net monetary benefit was estimated using non-parametric regression. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were used to assess uncertainty.

RESULTS

Fifty-two randomised controlled trials of non-bisphosphonates were included in the clinical effectiveness systematic review and an additional 51 randomised controlled trials of bisphosphonates were included in the network meta-analysis. All treatments had beneficial effects compared with placebo for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, with hazard ratios varying from 0.23 to 0.94, depending on treatment and fracture type. The effects on vertebral fractures and the percentage change in bone mineral density were statistically significant for all treatments. The rate of serious adverse events varied across trials (0-33%), with most between-group differences not being statistically significant for comparisons with placebo/no active treatment, non-bisphosphonates or bisphosphonates. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were > £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for all non-bisphosphonate interventions compared with no treatment across the range of QFracture and FRAX scores expected in the population eligible for fracture risk assessment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for denosumab may fall below £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year at very high levels of risk or for high-risk patients with specific characteristics. Raloxifene was dominated by no treatment (resulted in fewer quality-adjusted life-years) in most risk categories.

LIMITATIONS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are uncertain for very high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are generally greater than the commonly applied threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018107651.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 29. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Anabolic and antiresorptive actions of locally delivered bisphosphonates for bone repair: A review

During the last decades, several research groups have used bisphosphonates for local application to counteract secondary bone resorption after bone grafting, to improve implant fixation or to control bone resorption caused by bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). We focused on zoledronate (a bisphosphonate) due to its greater antiresorptive potential over other bisphosphonates. Recently, it has become obvious that the carrier is of importance to modulate the concentration and elution profile of the zoledronic acid locally. Incorporating one fifth of the recommended systemic dose of zoledronate with different apatite matrices and types of bone defects has been shown to enhance bone regeneration significantly in vivo. We expect the local delivery of zoledronate to overcome the limitations and side effects associated with systemic usage; however, we need to know more about the bioavailability and the biological effects. The local use of BMP-2 and zoledronate as a combination has a proven additional effect on bone regeneration. This review focuses primarily on the local use of zoledronate alone, or in combination with bone anabolic factors, in various preclinical models mimicking different orthopaedic conditions.

Cite this article: I. Qayoom, D. B. Raina, A. Širka, Š. Tarasevičius, M. Tägil, A. Kumar, L. Lidgren. Anabolic and antiresorptive actions of locally delivered bisphosphonates for bone repair: A review. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:548–560. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2018-0015.R2.

A systematic review and economic evaluation of bisphosphonates for the prevention of fragility fractures

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates [alendronic acid (Fosamax^® and Fosamax^® Once Weekly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd), risedronic acid (Actonel^® and Actonel Once a Week^®, Warner Chilcott UK Ltd), ibandronic acid (Bonviva^®, Roche Products Ltd) and zoledronic acid (Aclasta^®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd)] for the prevention of fragility fracture and to assess their cost-effectiveness at varying levels of fracture risk.

DATA SOURCES

For the clinical effectiveness review, six electronic databases and two trial registries were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science and BIOSIS Previews, Clinicaltrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Searches were limited by date from 2008 until September 2014.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of effectiveness studies were conducted. A review of published economic analyses was undertaken and a de novo health economic model was constructed. Discrete event simulation was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for each bisphosphonate treatment strategy and a strategy of no treatment for a simulated cohort of patients with heterogeneous characteristics. The model was populated with effectiveness evidence from the systematic review and NMA. All other parameters were estimated from published sources. A NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was taken, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Fracture risk was estimated from patient characteristics using the QFracture^® (QFracture-2012 open source revision 38, Clinrisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and FRAX^® (web version 3.9, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK) tools. The relationship between fracture risk and incremental net benefit (INB) was estimated using non-parametric regression. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and scenario analyses were used to assess uncertainty.

RESULTS

Forty-six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the clinical effectiveness systematic review, with 27 RCTs providing data for the fracture NMA and 35 RCTs providing data for the femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) NMA. All treatments had beneficial effects on fractures versus placebo, with hazard ratios varying from 0.41 to 0.92 depending on treatment and fracture type. The effects on vertebral fractures and percentage change in BMD were statistically significant for all treatments. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on fractures between bisphosphonates. A statistically significant difference in the incidence of influenza-like symptoms was identified from the RCTs for zoledronic acid compared with placebo. Reviews of observational studies suggest that upper gastrointestinal symptoms are frequently reported in the first month of oral bisphosphonate treatment, but pooled analyses of placebo-controlled trials found no statistically significant difference. A strategy of no treatment was estimated to have the maximum INB for patients with a 10-year QFracture risk under 1.5%, whereas oral bisphosphonates provided maximum INB at higher levels of risk. However, the PSA suggested that there is considerable uncertainty regarding whether or not no treatment is the optimal strategy until the QFracture score is around 5.5%. In the model using FRAX, the mean INBs were positive for all oral bisphosphonate treatments across all risk categories. Intravenous bisphosphonates were estimated to have lower INBs than oral bisphosphonates across all levels of fracture risk when estimated using either QFracture or FRAX.

LIMITATIONS

We assumed that all treatment strategies are viable alternatives across the whole population.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures. However, the benefit-to-risk ratio in the lowest-risk patients may be debatable given the low absolute QALY gains and the potential for adverse events. We plan to extend the analysis to include non-bisphosphonate therapies.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013006883.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Administration frequency as well as dosage of PTH are associated with development of cortical porosity in ovariectomized rats

To investigate whether the administration frequency of parathyroid hormone (PTH) is associated with the development of cortical porosity, this study established 15 dosage regimens of teriparatide [human PTH(1–34), TPTD] with four distinct concentrations and four distinct administration frequencies of TPTD to 16-week-old ovariectomized rats. Our analyses demonstrated that the bone mineral density, mechanical properties, and bone turnover were associated with the total amount of TPTD administered. Our observations further revealed that the cortical porosity was markedly developed as a result of an increased administration frequency with a lower concentration of total TPTD administration in our setting, although the highest concentration also induced cortical porosity. Deconvolution fluorescence tiling imaging on calcein-labeled undecalcified bone sections also demonstrated the development of cortical porosity to be closely associated with the bone site where periosteal bone formation took place. This site-specific cortical porosity involved intracortical bone resorption and an increased number and proximity of osteocytic lacunae, occasionally causing fused lacunae. Taken together, these findings suggested the involvement of local distinctions in the rate of bone growth that may be related to the site-specific mechanical properties in the development of cortical porosity induced by frequent and/or high doses of TPTD.

Comparison of treatment effects of teriparatide and the bisphosphonate risedronate in an aged, osteopenic, ovariectomized rat model under various clinical conditions

Teriparatide and bisphosphonates are osteoporosis medications that increase bone mineral density (BMD) and prevent fracture, but each has a different mechanism of action. Teriparatide promotes bone formation, while bisphosphonates suppress bone resorption. In the clinical setting, however, drug selection is not always tailored to the particular clinical condition of the patient or mechanism of action of the drug. We compared the effects of teriparatide and the bisphosphonate risedronate on bone metabolism using two ovariectomized rat models to elucidate the optimal use of these two drugs in the clinical setting. We first performed dose-finding experiments to determine the equivalent effective doses of each drug (5.6 and 3.0 µg/kg for teriparatide and risedronate, respectively). We then compared the effects of these doses on bone metabolism after subcutaneous administration three times weekly for 4 months starting either the day after ovariectomy (preventive study) or 12 months after ovariectomy (therapeutic study). The increase in proximal tibial BMD under the physical conditions that increased bone turnover at 1 to 2 months after ovariectomy was greater in the risedronate group than in the teriparatide group. In contrast, the increases in lumbar vertebral BMD and bone strength under the physical conditions that significantly decreased BMD and bone strength at 12 months after ovariectomy were greater in the teriparatide group than in the risedronate group. The present study provides important information on the selection of antiosteoporotic drugs, including teriparatide and risedronate, in treatment protocols tailored to the clinical conditions of patients and drug mechanisms.

Early Effects of Single and Low-Frequency Repeated Administration of Teriparatide, hPTH(1-34), on Bone Formation and Resorption in Ovariectomized Rats

Intermittent repeated administration of teriparatide (TPTD) has potent anabolic effects on bones in vivo. However, TPTD has both anabolic and catabolic effects on osteoblasts in vitro, and the mechanisms underlying its promotion of bone formation are unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the time-dependent changes in bone formation and resorption by examining changes in bone turnover markers and bone tissue over time after TPTD administration with low frequency in ovariectomized rats. The amount of serum osteocalcin, a bone formation marker, was transiently reduced after single TPTD administration, but increased thereafter, remaining increased for several days. In contrast, the amount of excreted urinary C-telopeptide, a bone resorption marker, increased transiently after single TPTD administration, and subsequently returned to control levels on the day after administration. Tissue histomorphometric analyses conducted 8 h after administration showed no changes in bone formation or bone resorption parameters. However, at 48 h, the bone formation parameters OS/BS and Ob.S/BS were increased, while the bone resorption parameter ES/BS was decreased. After repeated TPTD administration for 4 weeks, OS/BS, Ob.S/BS, and MS/BS increased, while Oc.S/BS decreased. Serum osteocalcin at 4 weeks after repeated administration was significantly correlated with OS/BS and Ob.S/BS. These present findings indicate that TPTD has dual, time-dependent effects on bone resorption and bone formation. Immediately after single administration, there was transient promotion of bone resorption and suppression of bone formation. However, sustained stimulation of bone formation occurred thereafter. Furthermore, these data suggest that this sustained bone formation led to anabolic effects with repeated TPTD administration.

Three-times-weekly administration of teriparatide improves vertebral and peripheral bone density, microarchitecture, and mechanical properties without accelerating bone resorption in ovariectomized rats

Daily and weekly administration of teriparatide (PTH1-34) reduces the risk of osteoporotic bone fractures. However, their effects on markers of bone formation and bone resorption differ. These results indicate that the dosing frequency of teriparatide may affect bone metabolism and bone structure, with different effects on bone strength. In the present study, to evaluate the dose-related effects of a low administration frequency of teriparatide on bone status, we investigated the effects of three-times-weekly administration of teriparatide (1.1, 5.6, or 28.2 µg/kg) for 12 months on bone parameters, including bone metabolism markers, bone mineral density (BMD), micro-computed tomography, and bone strength, using 6-month-old ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Three-times-weekly administration of teriparatide dose-dependently increased the BMD of the lumbar vertebra and femur in OVX rats, and increased serum osteocalcin (a marker of bone formation), but not type I collagen C-telopeptide (a marker of bone resorption). The trabecular number and thickness increased in the vertebrae and femur, as in prior reports of daily teriparatide administration in OVX rats. Cortical thickness increased only toward the endocortical side of the femur, unlike with daily administration. Bone strength of the vertebrae and proximal and shaft of the femur was correlated with the changes in BMD and bone structure. These results demonstrate the effects of low frequency, intermittent administration of teriparatide on the biomechanical, and microstructural properties of bone in OVX rats.

Bone safety with risedronate: histomorphometric studies at different dose levels and exposure

This report describes bone safety and histomorphometric data across different dose levels and dosing frequencies of risedronate. Normal bone structure and histomorphometric data were observed, with ongoing bone remodeling and mineralization regardless of dose. These data are reassuring and do not suggest compromised bone remodeling during treatment with established risedronate regimens.

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and bone safety of risedronate 5 mg daily were established in pivotal phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies. Histomorphometric analysis of paired biopsies demonstrated bone safety as reflected by presence of fluorescent tetracycline double-labels in all evaluable biopsies. This report describes bone safety and histomorphometric data across studies of various dose regimens of risedronate.

METHODS

Bridging studies, with bone mineral density as the primary endpoint, demonstrated non-inferiority of risedronate 35 mg and 50 mg once a week, risedronate 150 mg once a month, and a risedronate 75-mg dose on two consecutive days a month versus risedronate 5 mg daily. The low oral bioavailability and known dosing limitations due to food interactions of bisphosphonates have led to development of an oral delayed-release dose form of risedronate 35 mg to be taken weekly, before or after breakfast. Bone biopsies were collected at 24 months in studies involving these risedronate dosing regimens; bone safety and histomorphometric data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Qualitative bone histology showed normal mineralization of newly formed bone without evidence of pathological findings, such as osteomalacia, bone marrow dyscrasia, or bone marrow fibrosis. Importantly, ongoing bone remodeling, based on fluorochrome labeling, was observed in all patients regardless of dose and exposure. Key histomorphometric variables were comparable to those observed with the risedronate 5 mg daily dose and were within the range seen in healthy pre- and post-menopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results are reassuring with respect to bone safety and histomorphometric data, and do not suggest oversuppression of bone remodeling during treatment with these established risedronate regimens.

Can long-term bisphosphonate use causes low-energy fractures? A case report

Bisphosphonates are inorganic pyrophosphate analog which accumulate on the bone surface, cause osteoclast apoptosis, and inhibit bone resorption. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates continue to be the drug of choice for the treatment of osteoporosis in both men and women. Although histomorphometric studies including bone biopsies have not shown any evidence of microcracks, recent studies have revealed that potent bisphosphonates are responsible for the oversuppression of bone turnover leading to microdamages, reduced bone strength, and increased fracture risk. There are individual cases reporting atypical femoral fractures and severely suppressed bone turnover along with long-term (≥ 5 years) use of biphosphonates. In this study, we report on a 74-year-old woman with a history of continuous alendronate use for nearly 16 years who presented to the emergency department with right proximal humerus and left femur fracture.

Bisphosphonates and nonhealing femoral fractures: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and international safety efforts: a systematic review from the Research on Adverse Drug Events And Reports (RADAR) project

BACKGROUND

In the United States, hip fracture rates have declined by 30% coincident with bisphosphonate use. However, bisphosphonates are associated with sporadic cases of atypical femoral fracture. Atypical femoral fractures are usually atraumatic, may be bilateral, are occasionally preceded by prodromal thigh pain, and may have delayed fracture-healing. This study assessed the occurrence of bisphosphonate-associated nonhealing femoral fractures through a review of data from the U.S. FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (1996 to 2011), published case reports, and international safety efforts.

METHODS

We analyzed the FAERS database with use of the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and empiric Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) techniques to assess whether a safety signal existed. Additionally, we conducted a systematic literature review (1990 to February 2012).

RESULTS

The analysis of the FAERS database indicated a PRR of 4.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.44 to 5.92) for bisphosphonate use and nonhealing femoral fractures. Most cases (n = 317) were attributed to use of alendronate (PRR = 3.32; 95% CI, 2.71 to 4.17). In 2008, international safety agencies issued warnings and required label changes. In 2010, the FDA issued a safety notification, and the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) issued recommendations about bisphosphonate-associated atypical femoral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonhealing femoral fractures are unusual adverse drug reactions associated with bisphosphonate use, as up to 26% of published cases of atypical femoral fractures exhibited delayed healing or nonhealing.

Prospective histomorphometric and DXA evaluation of bone remodeling in imatinib-treated CML patients: evidence for site-specific skeletal effects

CONTEXT

Imatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been successfully used to treat Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Kit(+) gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We have previously shown that imatinib therapy is associated with an increase in trabecular bone volume.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we performed a prospective analysis of bone indices in imatinib-treated CML patients to determine the mechanism responsible for this altered bone remodeling. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTION: This study assessed the effects of high-dose (600 mg/d) imatinib on bone parameters in newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML patients (n = 11) enrolled in the TIDEL II study. At baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment, serum markers of bone remodeling were quantitated, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) was carried out, and a bone biopsy was collected for histological and micro-computed tomography analysis.

RESULTS

Our studies show that the increase in trabecular bone volume and trabecular thickness after imatinib treatment was associated with a significant decrease in osteoclast numbers, accompanied by a significant decrease in serum levels of a marker of osteoclast activity. In contrast, osteoblast numbers were not altered by up to 24 months of imatinib treatment. Notably, we also found that imatinib caused a site-specific decrease in BMD at the femoral neck.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that imatinib therapy dysregulates bone remodeling, causing a generalized decrease in osteoclast number and activity that is not counterbalanced by a decrease in osteoblast activity, leading to increased trabecular bone volume. Further long-term investigations are required to determine the causes and consequences of the site-specific decrease in BMD at the femoral neck.

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with delayed-release risedronate 35 mg weekly for 2 years

Bone mineral density response to once weekly delayed-release formulation of risedronate, given before or following breakfast, was non-inferior to that seen with traditional immediate-release risedronate given daily before breakfast. Delayed-release risedronate is a convenient dosing regimen for oral bisphosphonate therapy that might avoid poor compliance.

INTRODUCTION

This 2-year, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study assessed the efficacy and safety of a delayed-release (DR) 35-mg weekly oral formulation of risedronate that allows subjects to take their weekly risedronate dose before or immediately after breakfast. Results from the first year of the study were published previously (McClung et al. Osteoporos Int 23(1):267-276, 2012); we now report the final results after 2 years.

METHODS

Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg immediate-release (IR) daily (n = 307) at least 30 min before breakfast, or risedronate 35 mg DR weekly, either immediately following breakfast (FB, n = 307) or at least 30 min before breakfast (BB, n = 308). Bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fractures, adverse events, and bone histomorphometry were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 248 subjects (80.8 %) in the IR daily group, 234 subjects (76.2 %) in the DR FB weekly group, and 240 subjects (77.9 %) in the DR BB weekly group completed the 2-year study. After 2 years of treatment, BMD increases at the lumbar spine and total hip with the weekly DR doses similar to or greater than that with the IR daily dose. Decreases in BTMs were similar or significantly lower in the DR groups. Bone histomorphometry results did not differ among the DR weekly and the IR daily formulations. The three regimens were similarly well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate 35 mg DR weekly is as effective and as well tolerated as risedronate 5 mg IR daily, and will allow subjects to take their weekly risedronate dose immediately after breakfast.

Osteogenesis and osteoclast inhibition in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with bisphosphonates alone or in combination with pitavastatin over an 18-month follow-up after more than 4 years of treatment with bisphosphonates

Introduction

To investigate the effects of bisphosphonates (Bis) (etidronate, alendronate, and risedronate), alone and in combination with statin, on the BMD (bone mineral density) and bone metabolism of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods

Seventy-seven RA patients who had been receiving prednisolone (PSL) and Bis for over 4 years were divided into two groups: Bis and Bis + statin (n = 42 and 35; average age, 66.4 and 65.3 years; average disease duration, 24.9 and 20.8 years; average PSL dose, 2.4 and 2.7 mg, respectively). Serum levels of NTX (N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen), TRACP-5b (tartrate-resistant acid phosphate-5b), PICP (C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen), and RANKL (receptor activator of NF-κB ligand) were measured over an 18-month period of treatment and follow-up. The BMD levels of the two groups at the radius, lumbar spine, and femoral neck were compared using DXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry).

Results

A significant increase was only observed in the BMD of the lumbar spine at 18-months, but the BMDs of the radius and femoral neck decreased during the follow-up period in the Bis group. Meanwhile, a significant increase was observed in the BMD of the lumbar spine in the Bis + statin group during administration and the BMDs of the radius and femoral neck stayed at baseline. Among the markers of bone metabolism, serum NTX was up-regulated after 6 months in the Bis + statin group. Serum TRACP-5b was significantly increased during the follow-up period in the Bis + statin group, but only at 18 months in the Bis group. Serum PICP recovered to base line in the Bis + statin group, whereas that in the Bis group did not observably recover during the post-administration follow-up, but rather decreased.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that both bone resorption and bone formation were inhibited by long-term administration of Bis alone, whereas combination therapy with Bis + statin may be associated with a less marked inhibition of bone metabolism. Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent in RA patients and some patients are prescribed statins and bisphosphonate. Bis + statin may confer more benefit to the bone metabolism of these patients compared to Bis alone.

Review of current literature and implications of RANKL inhibitors for oral health care providers

Bisphosphonates (BPs) were the first class of drugs commonly used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with osteoporosis, multiple myeloma (MM), or solid tumors with metastases to bone. A new alternative class of agents, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitors, are now available for use in these indications and have the potential to replace intravenous BPs. This paper presents a review of the current literature on denosumab and its association with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Denosumab is a RANKL inhibitor that has recently been approved for the prevention of SRE for the same indications as BPs except for MM. Although the overall frequency of denosumab-related ONJ may be similar or higher than estimates of the occurrence rate of bisphosphonate-related ONJ, evidence continues to support appropriate planning and preventive care can reduce the likelihood of adverse effects, including osteonecrosis.

Effects of alendronate and risedronate on bone material properties in actively forming trabecular bone surfaces

We used Raman and Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (FTIRM) analysis to examine the intrinsic bone material properties at actively bone-forming trabecular surfaces in iliac crest biopsies from women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who were treated with either alendronate (ALN) or risedronate (RIS). At eight study sites, women were identified who had postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), were at least 5 years postmenopause, and had been on long-term therapy (either 3-5 years or >5 years) with daily or weekly ALN or RIS. Following standard tetracycline labeling, biopsies were collected from 102 women (33 treated with ALN for 3-5 years [ALN-3], 35 with ALN for >5 years [ALN-5], 26 with RIS for 3-5 years [RIS-3], and 8 with RIS for >5 years [RIS-5]) and were analyzed at anatomical areas of similar tissue age in bone-forming areas (within the fluorescent double labels). The following outcomes were monitored and reported: mineral to matrix ratio (corresponding to ash weight), relative proteoglycan content (regulating mineralization commencement), mineral maturity (indicative of the mineral crystallite chemistry and stoichiometry, and having a direct bearing on crystallite shape and size), and the ratio of two of the major enzymatic collagen cross-links (pyridinoline/divalent). In RIS-5 there was a significant decrease in the relative proteoglycan content (-5.83% compared to ALN-5), while in both RIS-3 and RIS-5 there was significantly lower mineral maturity/crystallinity (-6.78% and -13.68% versus ALN-3 and ALN-5, respectively), and pyridinoline/divalent collagen cross-link ratio (-23.09% and -41.85% versus ALN-3 and ALN-5, respectively). The results of the present study indicate that ALN and RIS exert differential effects on the intrinsic bone material properties at actively bone-forming trabecular surfaces.

Atypical bilateral pedicle fracture in long-term bisphosphonate therapy

STUDY DESIGN

A case report with review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To present a first case of an atraumatic bilateral pedicle fracture of L5 in a patient with long-term risedronate therapy and without any previous history of surgery or fracture.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A few cases of bilateral osteoporotic pedicle fractures have been reported. All were associated with previous or concomitant corporeal compression fractures. Atypical femoral fractures were recently described with long-term bisphosphonate treatment. To our knowledge, there are no previous reports of isolated bilateral pedicle fracture associated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy.

METHODS

A 66-year-old woman treated with risedronate for 10 years and without any history of trauma presented with exacerbation of low back pain. No fracture was noted in her past medical history.

RESULTS

A complete workup showed an isolated bilateral recent fracture of the L5 pedicles without evident etiology. Consolidation was achieved after 3 months of bracing.

CONCLUSION

We reported the first case of isolated bilateral pedicle fracture in a patient treated with risedronate for 10 years. This may be another atypical fracture in long-term bisphosphonate treatment.

Atypical femur fractures: a review of the evidence and its implication to clinical practice

Whilst bisphosphonates are an established modality in the treatment of osteoporosis, there have been increasing concerns regarding the risk of an unusual form of femur fracture amongst patients receiving bisphosphonates for prolonged periods. These fractures, referred to as 'atypical', have been characterized by a number of clinical and radiographic features that distinguish them from 'typical' osteoporotic fractures. The evidence base is currently split between a large number of case series demonstrating an association between the occurrence of atypical fractures and bisphosphonate use and several population-based studies that do not confirm such an association. Hence, a degree of uncertainty surrounds this important issue. In this review, we examine the emerging evidence on atypical femur fractures, assess hypotheses on their biomechanical evolution and discuss the wider clinical implications of this phenomenon.

The effect of risedronate treatment on serum osteoprotegerin and bone marker levels in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of risedronate treatment on osteoprotegerin (OPG), C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), osteocalcin (OC), and deoxypyridinoline (DPD).

METHODS

Eighty postmenopausal osteoporotic patients were randomized into two groups. In first group, patients received 35?mg of risedronate once a week and calcium with vitamin D per day. In second group, patients received only calcium with vitamin D per day. Bone turnover markers were measured at baseline, 1st, 3rd and 6th month.

RESULTS

OPG levels were significantly reduced at 1st and 6th month of treatment in both groups, but no statistically significant difference was detected between groups. In the group treated with risedronate, difference in CTX level was observed at 3rd month of treatment, while a difference in DPD and OC levels were observed at 6th month of treatment. The baseline OPG levels correlated with age, menopause duration, and CTX levels. There was no correlation between OPG levels and the levels of the other markers during treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that using risedronate in treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis causes no specific changes in OPG levels; therefore, in contrast to some of the studies in the literature OPG may not be useful marker in monitoring of bisphosphonate.

Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects

To treat systemic bone loss as in osteoporosis and/or focal osteolysis as in rheumatoid arthritis or periodontal disease, most approaches target the osteoclasts, the cells that resorb bone. Bisphosphonates are currently the most widely used antiresorptive therapies. They act by binding the mineral component of bone and interfere with the action of osteoclasts. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, such as alendronate, act as inhibitors of farnesyl-pyrophosphate synthase, which leads to inhibition of the prenylation of many intracellular signaling proteins. The discovery of RANKL and the essential role of RANK signaling in osteoclast differentiation, activity and survival have led to the development of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody. Denosumab acts by binding to and inhibiting RANKL, leading to the loss of osteoclasts from bone surfaces. In phase 3 clinical studies, denosumab was shown to significantly reduce vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures compared with placebo and increase areal BMD compared with alendronate. In this review, we suggest that the key pharmacological differences between denosumab and the bisphosphonates reside in the distribution of the drugs within bone and their effects on precursors and mature osteoclasts. This may explain differences in the degree and rapidity of reduction of bone resorption, their potential differential effects on trabecular and cortical bone, and the reversibility of their actions.

Risedronate reduces intracortical porosity in women with osteoporosis

Nonvertebral fractures account for 80% of all fractures and their accompanying morbidity and mortality. Despite this, the effect of drug therapy on cortical morphology has received limited attention, partly because cortical bone is believed to remodel less and decrease less with age than trabecular bone. However, the haversian canals traversing the cortex provide a surface for remodeling that produces bone loss, porosity, and cortical fragility. We developed a new method of 3D micro-computed tomography (microCT) to quantify intracortical porosity and the effects of treatment. Women with osteoporosis randomized to risedronate (5 mg/day, n = 28) or placebo (n = 21) had paired transiliac biopsies at baseline and 5 years imaged using 3D microCT. Pores determined from 8 to 12 slices were stratified by their minor axis length into those 25 to 100 microm (closing cone of haversian canals), 100 to 300 microm (cutting cone of haversian canals), and >300 microm (coalescent cavities). Porosity was analyzed as pore area (percent bone area) and pore density (pore number/mm(2)). Medians are reported. Risedronate reduced pore area in the 25 to 100, 100 to 300, and 300 to 500 microm ranges over 5 years (p = .0008, .04, NS, respectively) corresponding to an 18% to 25% reduction. In the placebo group, pore area was unchanged. At 5 years, pore area and pore number/mm(2) in the 25 to 100 microm range were each 17% lower in the risedronate group than in the placebo group (p = .02 and .04, respectively). Risedronate is likely to maintain bone strength and reduce nonvertebral fracture risk in part by reducing remodeling and therefore the number and size of intracortical cavities.

Anti-fracture efficacy of risedronic acid in men: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Male osteoporosis is an important public health issue and remains undertreated. We performed this meta-analysis to clarify the anti-fracture efficacy of risedronic acid in men.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in men receiving risedronic acid or placebo published between 1980 and September 2008 were searched for in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies with a follow-up of at least 12 months and providing the incidence of fractures were considered for inclusion in the review. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the included studies and performed data extraction. Analysis of pooled data was carried out using Revman 4.2 software.

RESULTS

Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria and permitted a pooled estimate of effectiveness. Relative risk with 95% confidence intervals for pooled effect under fixed effects model were: 0.31 (0.16, 0.60) for vertebral fractures and 0.40 (0.23, 0.70) for nonvertebral fractures, suggesting a 69% risk reduction of vertebral fractures and a 60% risk reduction of nonvertebral fracture with risedronic acid treatment in men.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis show that risedronic acid treatment is associated with a reduced risk of fractures in men.

DXA-based hip structural analysis of once-weekly bisphosphonate-treated postmenopausal women with low bone mass

SUMMARY

DXA-based hip structural analysis from 947 individuals completing two large osteoporosis clinical trials was pooled and analyzed. Treatment with once-weekly (OW) ALN or OW RIS resulted in significant improvements from baseline in geometric parameters at all three HSA ROIs. Improvements were generally greater with OW ALN than OW RIS.

INTRODUCTION

BMD can be altered by changes in distribution and quantity of bone and changes in mineralization. These effects cannot be distinguished with conventional measurements of BMD. Currently, tissue composition is evaluated only by invasive means. Structural geometry of the proximal femur, however, can be measured in vivo by several methods, including dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using specialized hip structure analysis (HSA) software.

METHODS

DXA-based HSA was obtained and analyzed in a subset of 947 subjects participating in the Fosamax Actonel Comparison Trials. Data were pooled to evaluate treatment effects on the structural geometry of the proximal femur by once-weekly alendronate (ALN) 70 mg and risedronate (RIS) 35 mg in postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

RESULTS

Both ALN and RIS treatment over 2 years resulted in improvements in HSA-derived geometry at all three HSA regions of interest (ROI). The largest treatment effects were seen at the intertrochanteric ROI. Consistently greater treatment effects were seen with ALN compared with RIS at all three HSA-ROIs.

CONCLUSIONS

HSA offers insight into the potential mechanisms of fracture risk reduction from pharmacologic intervention. In the current study, treatment with once-weekly bisphosphonates resulted in significant improvements in hip geometric parameters.

Theoretical analysis of alendronate and risedronate effects on canine vertebral remodeling and microdamage

Bisphosphonates suppress bone remodeling activity, increase bone volume, and significantly reduce fracture risk in individuals with osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. The objectives of the current study were to develop a mathematical model that simulates control and 1 year experimental results following bisphosphonate treatment (alendronate or risedronate) in the canine fourth lumbar vertebral body, validate the model by comparing simulation predictions to 3 year experimental results, and then use the model to predict potential long term effects of bisphosphonates on remodeling and microdamage accumulation. To investigate the effects of bisphosphonates on bone volume and microdamage, a mechanistic biological model was modified from previous versions to simulate remodeling in a representative volume of vertebral trabecular bone in dogs treated with various doses of alendronate or risedronate, including doses equivalent to those used for treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis in humans. Bisphosphonates were assumed to affect remodeling by suppressing basic multicellular unit activation and reducing resorption area. Model simulation results for trabecular bone volume fraction, microdamage, and activation frequency following 1 year of bisphosphonate treatment are consistent with experimental measurements. The model predicts that trabecular bone volume initially increases rapidly with 1 year of bisphosphonate treatment, and continues to slowly rise between 1 and 3 years of treatment. The model also predicts that microdamage initially increases rapidly, 0.5-1.5-fold for alendronate or risedronate during the first year of treatment, and reaches its maximum value by 2.5 years before trending downward for all dosages. The model developed in this study suggests that increasing bone volume fraction with long term bisphosphonate treatment may sufficiently reduce strain and damage formation rate so that microdamage does not accumulate above that which is initiated in the first two years of treatment.

Effects of short-term risedronate on bone resorption and patient satisfaction in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients

This multicenter, open-label study evaluated the effects of short-term risedronate on bone resorption and patient satisfaction in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Brazil. Entry requirements included: osteoporosis of the spine/femoral neck diagnosed by a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score<or=-2.5 or radiographic fragility fracture within the last year and no treatment with osteoporosis medication in the preceding 3 mo. Patients were treated with once weekly risedronate of 35 mg for 12 wk. Patients also received 1000 mg calcium carbonate and 400 IU vitamin D. The main outcome was the effect on bone resorption, as assessed by the quantification of serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). Of the 556 women screened, 480 women received >or=1 dose of study drug (intent-to-treat [ITT] population), and 390 completed treatment (81%). After 12 wk, CTX decreased in 94% of patients (from 0.419+/-0.234 to 0.158+/-0.171 microg/L, p<0.0001). Mean CTX reduction was 60.6%. Patient satisfaction was good/excellent in 91.7% of patients. A total of 156 adverse events (AEs) were reported by 113 (23.5%) patients in the ITT population. Digestive symptoms emerged or worsened in 7.1% and 3.5%, respectively. Five patients (1.0%) experienced serious AEs, not considered to be related to risedronate. In conclusion, risedronate significantly reduced serum CTX after 12-wk treatment. Almost all patients reported good/excellent satisfaction.

Pharmacovigilance and reporting oversight in US FDA fast-track process: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw

More than half of all serious adverse reactions are identified 7 or more years after a drug receives approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2002, 9 months after the intravenous bisphosphonate zoledronic acid received regulatory approval for marketing, the FDA received reports of nine patients with cancer, who were treated with zoledronic acid, who unexpectedly developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. During the next 2 years, three oral surgeons described 104 patients with cancer with osteonecrosis of the jaw in the medical literature and identified intravenous bisphosphonate therapy as being common to the care of these patients. In subspecialty medical, radiology, and dental journals, case reports and case series described clinical features of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with cancer who were treated with bisphosphonates. Manufacturer-sponsored epidemiological studies reported the first estimates of the incidence of this toxic effect, ranging from 0.1% to 1.8%. By contrast, independent epidemiological efforts from clinicians and the International Myeloma Foundation reported incidence estimates between 5% and 10%. Between 2003 and 2005, warnings about the risks of bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis were disseminated by national regulatory agencies, the manufacturers of bisphosphonates, and the International Myeloma Foundation. From 2006, independent clinical recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this toxic effect have been disseminated by manufacturers, national regulatory authorities, the International Myeloma Foundation, and medical specialty organisations. Furthermore, independent efforts by pharmaceutical manufacturers, dental and medical professionals, a non-profit organisation (the International Myeloma Foundation), patients, and regulatory authorities has led to the rapid identification and dissemination of safety information for this serious adverse reaction. Better coordination of safety-related pharmacovigilance initiatives is now needed.

Effect of temporal changes in bone turnover on the bone mineralization density distribution: a computer simulation study

The heterogeneous distribution of mineral content in trabecular bone reflects the continuous renewal of bone material in bone remodeling and the subsequent increase in mineral content in the newly formed bone packets. The bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) is typically used to describe this nonuniform mineral content of the bone matrix. Our mathematical model describes changes of the BMDD of trabecular bone as a function of bone resorption and deposition rates and the mineralization kinetics in a newly formed bone packet. Input parameters used in the simulations were taken from experimental studies. The simulations of the time evolution of the BMDD after increase in bone turnover (perimenopausal period) resulted in a shift of the BMDD toward lower values of the mineral content. Transiently, there was a broadening of the BMDD configuration partly showing two peaks, which points to a strongly heterogeneous distribution of the mineral. Conversely, when the remodeling rate was reduced (antiresorptive therapy), the BMDD shifted toward higher values of the mineral content. There was a transient narrowing of the distribution before broadening again to reach the new steady state. Results from this latter simulation are in good agreement with measurements of the BMDD of patients after 3 and 5 yr of treatment with risedronate. Based on available experimental data on bone remodeling, this model gives reliable predictions of changes in BMDD, an important factor of bone material quality. With the availability of medications with a known effect on bone turnover, this knowledge opens the possibility for therapeutic manipulation of the BMDD.

Bisphosphonates in chronic kidney disease; balancing potential benefits and adverse effects on bone and soft tissue

Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is often associated with increased vascular stiffness and calcification. Recent studies have suggested a complex interaction between vascular calcification and abnormalities of bone and mineral metabolism, with an inverse relationship between arterial calcification and bone mineral density (BMD). Although osteoporosis is recognized and treated in CKD 1 to 3, the interpretation of BMD levels in the osteoporotic range is controversial in CKD 4, 5, and 5D when renal osteodystrophy is generally present. In addition, there is a paucity of data for patients with CKD mineral and bone disorder (MBD), because studies using bisphosphonates in postmenopausal and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis have generally excluded patients with significant CKD. For these patients, treatment of low BMD using standard therapies for osteoporosis is not without potential for harm due to the possibility of worsening low bone turnover, osteomalacia, mixed uraemic osteodystrophy, and of exacerbated hyperparathyroidism; and bisphosphonates should only be used selectively and with caution. Some experimental and clinical studies have also suggested that bisphosphonates may reduce progression of extra-osseous calcification and inhibit the development of atherosclerosis. The authors review the potential benefits and risks associated with bisphosphonate use for bone protection in CKD, and assess their effect on vascular calcification and atherosclerosis.

Osteoporosis and its implications for dental patients

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is a common disease in middle-aged and older Americans. The risk of sustaining fractures is a concern, and mortality rates after hip or vertebral fractures are high. Oral health maintenance for adults with osteoporosis is important.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors conducted a MEDLINE search of the medical and dental literature with the objective of reviewing osteoporosis, its effect on public health in the population in the United States and the implications in providing dental care for these patients. They selected studies by performing a content search with National Library of Medicine medical subject headings (epidemiology, public health impact, treatment, adverse drug reactions, cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis therapy, oral health, periodontal disease, adverse drug reactions, bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw). They then performed a study design search with a filter so that only randomized clinical trials were included.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis and related fractures are more common than coronary disease, stroke and breast cancer. Fractures resulting from osteoporosis can affect a patient's quality of life severely, and fractures result in functional impairment and increased health care cost and mortality. Medical management of osteoporosis includes diet control, with appropriate intake of calcium and vitamin D, weight-bearing exercise, discontinuation of tobacco and alcohol intake, and use of medications, including selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, anabolic agents and bisphosphonates. Bisphosphonates have been associated with the development of osteonecrosis of the jaws.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Oral health maintenance is important in patients with osteoporosis. Bisphosphonate therapy or other medical treatment for these people should be discontinued only after consultation with the patient's physician.

Histomorphometric and microCT analysis of bone biopsies from postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with strontium ranelate

Strontium ranelate is a new anti-osteoporotic treatment. On bone biopsies collected from humans receiving long-term treatment over 5 yr, it has been shown that strontium ranelate has good bone safety and better results than placebo on 3D microarchitecture. Hence, these effects may explain the decreased fracture rate.

INTRODUCTION

Strontium ranelate's mode of action involving dissociation of bone formation and resorption was shown in preclinical studies and could explain its antifracture efficacy in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-one transiliac bone biopsies were obtained from 133 postmenopausal osteoporotic women: 49 biopsies after 1-5 yr of 2 g/d strontium ranelate and 92 biopsies at baseline or after 1-5 yr of placebo.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Histomorphometry provided a 2D demonstration of the bone safety of strontium ranelate, with significantly higher mineral apposition rate (MAR) in cancellous bone (+9% versus control, p = 0.019) and borderline higher in cortical bone (+10%, p = 0.056). Osteoblast surfaces were significantly higher (+38% versus control, p = 0.047). 3D analysis of 3-yr biopsies with treatment (20 biopsies) and placebo (21 biopsies) using microCT showed significant changes in microarchitecture with, in the strontium ranelate group, higher cortical thickness (+18%, p = 0.008) and trabecular number (+14%, p = 0.05), and lower structure model index (-22%, p = 0.01) and trabecular separation (-16%, p = 0.04), with no change in cortical porosity. The changes in 3D microarchitecture may enhance bone biomechanical competence and explain the decreased fracture rate with strontium ranelate.

Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is an abnormal reduction in bone mass and bone deterioration leading to increased fracture risk. Risedronate belongs to the bisphosphonate class of drugs which act to inhibit bone resorption by interfering with the activity of osteoclasts.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of residronate in the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Relevant randomized controlled trials published between 1966 to 2007 were identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Women receiving at least one year of risedronate for postmenopausal osteoporosis were compared to those receiving placebo or concurrent calcium/vitamin D or both. The outcome was fracture incidence.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We carried out study selection and data abstraction in duplicate. Study quality was assessed through the reporting of allocation concealment, blinding and withdrawals. Meta-analysis was preformed using relative risks and a >15% relative change was considered clinically important.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were included in the review representing 14,049 women. Relative (RRR) and absolute (ARR) risk reductions for the 5 mg dose were as follows. Risk estimates for primary prevention were available only for vertebral and non vertebral fractures and showed no statistically significant effect of risedronate on fractures. For secondary prevention, a significant 39% RRR in vertebral fractures (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.76) with 5% ARR was found. For non-vertebral fractures, a significant 20% RRR (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.90) with 2% ARR and for hip fractures there was a significant 26% RRR (RR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.94) with a 1% ARR. When primary and secondary prevention studies were combined, the reduction in fractures remained statistically significant for both vertebral (RR 0.63, 0.51 to 0.77) and non vertebral fractures (RR 0.80, 0.72 to 0.90)For adverse events, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the included studies. However, observational data has led to concerns regarding the potential risk for upper gastrointestinal injury and, less commonly, osteonecrosis of the jaw.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At 5 mg/day a statistically significant and clinically important benefit in the secondary prevention of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures was observed, but not for wrist. The level of evidence for secondary prevention is Gold (www.cochranemsk.org) for vertebral and non-vertebral and Silver for hip and wrist. There were no statistically significant reductions in the primary prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. The level of evidence is Silver.

Comparative effects of antiresorptive agents on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a common clinical entity; its complications represent a significant burden to society. In recent years the choice of therapies available for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis has increased dramatically. There are a number of antiresorptive agents currently available including hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), bisphosphonates, and dual action bone agents. It is difficult to truly compare these therapies given the lack of direct head-to head studies. The efficacy of antiresorptive therapies can be assessed in a number of ways including measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), assessment of bone turnover markers, and fracture reduction. Other important factors include ease of administration and consequent patient compliance. This article reviews the currently available antiresorptive agents and their effects on the above outcome measures.

AA, Acúrcio FDA. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women: a systematic review

Osteoporosis, a typical disease of the elderly, has become a frequent and relevant public health problem. Several drugs are available for treatment of osteoporosis, some of which are currently dispensed by the Brazilian Unified National Health System. The objective of this study was to present a systematic review of drugs for treatment of osteoporosis, focusing on the adequacy of clinical protocols based on existing evidence in the scientific literature. We conducted a search for randomized clinical trials in PubMed and LILACS that presented results for bone mineral density, incidence of vertebral fractures, and adverse effects. 32 articles met the review's inclusion criteria. Bisphosphonates were reported to have consistently reduced the risk of vertebral fractures. Hormone replacement therapy showed positive outcomes, but its use has been found to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer. Teriparatide and monofluorophosphate also showed efficacy against osteoporosis. Calcium and vitamin D were given to patients as food supplements.

Combination therapy for treatment of osteoporosis: A review

Combination therapy for osteoporosis has been tested in small trials of short duration with various combinations. Pertinent human and animal randomized clinical trial data were identified through Medline and reviewed with a focus on the risks and benefits of different types of combination therapies. Improvements in bone density were found in some, but not all, combinations. There are no large trials of adequate length or numbers to determine fracture efficacy. Consider combination therapy if monotherapy is unsuccessful, if there is an added nonskeletal benefit to the proposed combination or as sequential treatment with an anabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive agent. Although combination therapy, in general, has limitations based on cost, concern about potential oversuppression of bone, and lack of long-term safety and fracture efficacy, selected patients may benefit.

Microcrack frequency and bone remodeling in postmenopausal osteoporotic women on long-term bisphosphonates: a bone biopsy study

We sought whether microdamage could rise in postmenopausal osteoporotic women on long-term bisphosphonates, as suggested by recent animal studies. We found few microcracks in iliac bone biopsies, despite a marked reduction in bone turnover.

INTRODUCTION

Animal studies suggest that bisphosphonates (BPs) could increase microdamage frequency in a dose-dependent manner, caused by excessively suppressed bone turnover. However, there is limited data in humans receiving BP therapeutic doses for >3 yr.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured microcrack frequency and histomorphometry parameters on transiliac bone biopsies in 50 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (mean age = 68 yr) who had received BP therapy (3 on intravenous pamidronate, 37 on oral alendronate, and 10 on oral risedronate) for at least 3 yr (mean treatment duration = 6.5 yr). We compared these results with transiliac bone biopsies obtained from 12 cadavers. We used bulk staining with green calcein as a fluorochrome. The microcracks were quantified in three 100-microm-thick sections using optic microscopy and were confirmed by laser confocal microscopy. Microcrack frequency (number of microcracks/mm2 of bone tissue) was compared between treated women and controls using nonparametric tests. We also explored predictors of microcrack frequency, including age, duration of BP therapy, and activation frequency.

RESULTS

Among treated women, cancellous bone microcrack frequency was low (mean, 0.13 microcracks/mm2) and did not differ significantly from that observed in controls (0.05 microcracks/mm2; p = 0.59). Of note, 54% of the treated women and 58% of the controls had no observable microcracks. There was no association between microcrack frequency and the duration of BP therapy (for microcracks/mm2 and duration, Spearman r = 0.04, p = 0.80) and between patients' ages and the number of microcracks (Spearman r = -0.09, p = 0.61). Although bone remodeling parameters were suppressed in treated women, we found no relationship between microcrack density and activation frequency (Spearman r = -0.003, p = 0.99). Also, microcrack frequency was not increased in women with prevalent vertebral fracture compared with those without fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Among postmenopausal osteoporotic women on long-term BPs, microcrack frequency in the iliac bone is low, despite a marked reduction of bone turnover.

Is there a role for bisphosphonates in chronic kidney disease?

Patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) including those on dialysis can and do develop osteoporosis. They also develop a wide range of other metabolic bone diseases that may look like osteoporosis when it is defined by either the World Health Organization bone mineral density (BMD) criteria or by the development of fragility fractures. Those dialysis patients with osteoporosis that is due to gonadal hormone deficiency such as postmenopausal osteoporosis, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, or male osteoporosis may benefit from the administration of bisphosphonates (BPs). The challenges lie in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in this population where adynamic, osteomalacic, hyperparathyroid, or aluminum bone disease are also prevalent, with concommitant low BMD and low trauma fractures, but where BPs may be contraindicated. The only secure means to diagnose osteoporosis in this patient population is by quantitative bone histomorphometry demonstrating low trabecular bone volume and disrupted microarchitecture. Once the diagnosis of osteoporosis is established, BPs should be considered for a well-defined brief period of time (e.g., 2-3 years), even though there is no evidence for a fracture reduction benefit in this population. If a BP is chosen there may be a need for dose adjustment or slower infusion rates (for the intravenous formulations), as a greater bone retention may occur for these renally cleared agents. While it is unknown what consequences could develop from increased bone retention in patients with little renal function, data are needed if more bone retention of BP might lead to a greater risk of the development of adynamic bone disease and lower bone strength. More data are needed to define the risks and benefits of BPs in patients with stage 5 CKD.

Clinical evaluation of novel bisphosphonate dosing regimens in osteoporosis: The role of comparative studies and implications for future studies

BACKGROUND

Daily nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates have shown antifracture efficacy in many studies of postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, current dosing schedules are often inconvenient or impractical for patients. Efforts to reduce dosing frequency to improve adherence (ie, compliance and persistence), and therefore treatment outcomes, are ongoing. Although a number of trial designs can be used to consider the efficacy of therapy, comparing the efficacy of different regimens should only be undertaken in purposefully designed head-to-head studies.

OBJECTIVE

This article summarizes the design and conduct of clinical studies that have investigated alternative bisphosphonate regimens and those that have directly compared different approved bisphosphonates. It also explores the implications for future studies of postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment.

METHODS

Using the terms bisphosphonate, daily, weekly, and monthly, a search (completed in 2006) of the PubMed database was conducted to identify primary English-language publications of pertinent studies comparing either novel with established regimens of the same bisphosphonates or different established bisphosphonates.

RESULTS

The first option is the equivalence or noninferiority bridging study for comparison of new treatment regimens versus the established regimen of the same bisphosphonate, known as the active comparator. Four such studies have led to the registration of novel bisphosphonate dosing regimens designed to provide easier dosing alternatives for patients. The second option is the active comparator study, which compares one bisphosphonate with the most prescribed weekly bisphosphonate. Weekly dosed oral alendronate has previously been shown to be superior (for bone mineral density gains) to daily and weekly dosed oral risedronate. An ongoing noninferiority study, Monthly Oral Therapy with Ibandronate for Osteoporosis Intervention, is comparing weekly alendronate with ibandronate, a monthly oral bisphosphonate.

CONCLUSIONS

The exploration of new dosing schedules and formulations aims to identify the optimal bisphosphonate regimen for postmenopausal osteoporosis. To achieve this, careful consideration must be given to the choice of a scientifically valid study design that effectively, and ethically, meets the study objectives. Given the concerns regarding placebo-controlled antifracture studies, 2 alternative study designs should be considered, both using validated surrogate end points (bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover) as the principal mode of assessment.

Monitoring osteoporosis therapies

Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is a progressive disease of bone loss, fractures, or both. The progression of osteoporosis leads to increased mortality and morbidity and impairs quality of life. There are effective treatments that prevent bone loss, increase bone strength, and reduce fracture risk. Improvement in persistence and adherence to therapy leads to better clinical outcomes. The management of PMO is facilitated by measuring surrogate markers of the efficacy of PMO treatments: 1) bone mineral density, 2) bone turnover markers, and 3) assessment of spinal integrity by vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Appropriate use of markers measures the patient's baseline fracture risk and monitors response to treatments. Clinicians must interpret markers in the context of a patient's fracture risk and determine the effectiveness of therapy. Integrating these markers enhances overall patient care. The surrogate markers help the clinician to achieve the goal of managing PMO; attempting to manage PMO without markers reduces the clinical management to guesswork.

How long should patients take medications for postmenopausal osteoporosis?

Several medications have proved effective in reducing the fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The optimal duration of use of these medications remains to be established, however. Gains in bone mineral density (BMD) persisted throughout 10 years of treatment with alendronate or 7 years with risedronate. However, proof of long-term protection against fractures was obtained only for shorter treatment periods, 4 years with alendronate and 5 years with risedronate. The persistence of treatment effects after drug discontinuation varies across medications, and further studies are needed before this point can be incorporated into treatment decisions. With raloxifene, the BMD effect observed after 3 and 4 years persisted when the drug was given for 8 years, and the fracture risk reduction was similar after 4 years and after 3 years. The long-term safety profile also was similar, with a significant decrease in the incidence of invasive estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer and a persistent increase in the risk of deep vein thrombosis. However, a sharp drop in BMD occurred upon raloxifene discontinuation. Thus, 4 years may be appropriate for anti-resorptive drug therapy. However, the optimal treatment duration should be determined on a case-by-case basis according to the results of regular fracture-risk evaluations.

Bone material properties in trabecular bone from human iliac crest biopsies after 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate

Long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio in triple iliac crest biopsies of osteoporotic women were evaluated. In this double-blinded study, 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate arrested the tissue aging encountered in untreated osteoporosis and in osteoporosis treated with other antiresorptives. This effect may be contributing to risedronate's antifracture efficacy.

INTRODUCTION

Risedronate is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. It reduces bone turnover, increases BMD, and decreases fracture risk. To date, there are no data available on the long-term effects of risedronate on bone material properties in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Osteoporotic women enrolled in the VERT-NA trial received either risedronate (5 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 5 years. All subjects received calcium. They also received vitamin D supplementation if deficient at baseline. Triple iliac crest biopsies were collected from a subset of these subjects at baseline, 3 years, and 5 years. Mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio was measured in these biopsies using Fourier transform infrared imaging.

RESULTS

Patients that received placebo exhibited increased mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio after 3 and 5 years compared with baseline values. On the contrary, patients that received risedronate retained baseline values in both bone material indices throughout. A more spatially detailed analysis revealed that this was achieved mainly through beneficial effects on active bone-forming areas. Surprisingly, patients that received risedronate achieved premenopausal values at bone-forming areas in both indices after 5 years of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with risedronate affects bone material properties (mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio) and arrests the tissue aging apparent in untreated osteoporosis. These changes at the material level of the bone matrix may contribute to risedronate's rapid and sustained antifracture efficacy in osteoporotic patients.

Drug insight: Bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are potent antiresorptive agents, which have largely been used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis during the past 10 years. When embedded in bone matrix, bisphosphonates are taken up by osteoclasts engaged in bone resorption, leading--mainly by inhibition of farnesyl diphosphate synthase, a key enzyme of the mevalonate pathway--to osteoclast apoptosis. Bone resorption decreases, with consequent improvement in the mechanical properties of bone and a reduced risk of fracture. Alendronate and risedronate are oral nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates. Several randomized, placebo-controlled trials have shown the ability of these bisphosphonates to halve the risk of vertebral fracture when taken daily for 3 years. Nonvertebral fracture risk, including that at the hip, was also significantly decreased. Weekly regimens have simplified the administration of bisphosphonates and, probably, improved adherence to treatment. A significant reduction in the risk of vertebral fracture has also been demonstrated with an intermittent regimen of ibandronate, which is a new, potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. Ibandronate was recently marketed for use in an oral, once-monthly dose of 150 mg, with the goal of improving compliance. Bisphosphonates are usually well tolerated in the long term. Intravenous administration of bisphosphonates in women with osteoporosis, which is currently under investigation, might be an interesting future option for women who cannot tolerate oral regimens, and for enhancing compliance.

Long-term risedronate treatment normalizes mineralization and continues to preserve trabecular architecture: sequential triple biopsy studies with micro-computed tomography

The objective of the study was to assess the time course of changes in bone mineralization and architecture using sequential triple biopsies from women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who received long-term treatment with risedronate. Transiliac biopsies were obtained from the same subjects (n = 7) at baseline and after 3 and 5 years of treatment with 5 mg daily risedronate. Mineralization was measured using 3-dimensional (3D) micro-computed tomography (CT) with synchrotron radiation and was compared to levels in healthy premenopausal women (n = 12). Compared to the untreated PMO women at baseline, the premenopausal women had higher average mineralization (Avg-MIN) and peak mineralization (Peak-MIN) by 5.8% (P = 0.003) and 8.0% (P = 0.003), respectively, and lower ratio of low to high-mineralized bone volume (BMR-V) and surface area (BMR-S) by 73.3% (P = 0.005) and 61.7% (P = 0.003), respectively. Relative to baseline, 3 years of risedronate treatment significantly increased Avg-MIN (4.9 +/- 1.1%, P = 0.016) and Peak-MIN (6.2 +/- 1.5%, P = 0.016), and significantly decreased BMR-V (-68.4 +/- 7.3%, P = 0.016) and BMR-S (-50.2 +/- 5.7%, P = 0.016) in the PMO women. The changes were maintained at the same level when treatment was continued up to 5 years. These results are consistent with the significant reduction of turnover observed after 3 years of treatment and which was similarly maintained through 5 years of treatment. Risedronate restored the degree of mineralization and the ratios of low- to high-mineralized bone to premenopausal levels after 3 years of treatment, suggesting that treatment reduced bone turnover in PMO women to healthy premenopausal levels. Conventional micro-CT analysis further demonstrated that bone volume (BV/TV) and trabecular architecture did not change from baseline up to 5 years of treatment, suggesting that risedronate provided long-term preservation of trabecular architecture in the PMO women. Overall, risedronate provided sustained benefits on mineralization and architecture, two key determinants of bone strength, over 5 years lending support for its long-term efficacy in fracture risk reduction.