Steady-state pharmacokinetics of atazanavir given alone or in combination with saquinavir hard-gel capsules or amprenavir in HIV-1-infected patients

Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir With Atazanavir or Low-Dose Ritonavir Administered Once Daily (ASPIRE I) or Twice Daily (ASPIRE II) in Seronegative Volunteers

ASPIRE I and II were prospective, 3-way sequential crossover studies in healthy volunteers to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) with saquinavir/atazanavir (SQV/ATV) administered either once daily (QD, ASPIRE I) or twice daily (BID, ASPIRE II). Treatments were separated by 10 days, and pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on days 11, 32, and 53. SQV pharmacokinetics were significantly higher when dosed with RTV compared to ATV (P < .05 for all comparisons). ATV pharmacokinetics were similar within treatment arms. ATV Cmin increased approximately 60%, and Cmax decreased approximately 35% with BID dosing compared with QD dosing. Women had higher exposure for all 3 protease inhibitors (PIs) compared with men after adjusting for weight. Adverse effects were primarily gastrointestinal-related with SQV/RTV and hyperbilirubinemia with SQV/ATV. Although SQV plasma concentrations were higher when coadministered with RTV, a combination of SQV/ATV administered BID may be a viable alternative in HIV-infected, PI-naive subjects intolerant to RTV.

Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic modelling of atazanavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected adults and assessment of different dose reduction strategies

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop a simultaneous population pharmacokinetic (PK) model to describe atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) PK (300/100 mg) and to assess the effect of RTV dose reduction on ATV PK. Simulations of ATV concentration-time profiles were performed at doses of ATV/RTV 300/50 mg, 200/50 mg, and 200/100 mg once daily.

METHODS

A total of 288 ATV and 312 RTV plasma concentrations from 30 patients were included to build a population PK model using the stochastic approximation expectation maximization algorithm implemented in MONOLIX 3.2 software.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag-time best described the data for both drugs in the final simultaneous model. A maximum-effect model in which RTV inhibited the elimination of ATV was used to describe the relationship between RTV concentrations and ATV clearance (CL/F). An RTV concentration of 0.22 mg/L was associated with 50% maximum inhibition of ATV CL/F. The population prediction of ATV CL/F in the absence of RTV was 16.6 L/h (relative standard error, 7.0%), and the apparent volume of distribution and absorption rate constant were 106 L (relative standard error, 8%) and 0.87 per hour (fixed), respectively. Simulated average ATV trough concentrations at ATV/RTV 300/50 mg, 200/50 mg, and 200/100 mg once daily were 45%, 63%, and 33% lower, respectively, than that of the standard dose.

CONCLUSION

Although simulated median ATV trough concentrations after dose reductions were still more than the ATV minimum effective concentration (2.9-, 1.9-, and 3.6-fold for ATV/RTV 300/50 mg, 200/50 mg, and 200/100 mg, respectively); our modeling predicted a high proportion of individuals with subtherapeutic trough concentrations on the 200/50 mg dose. This suggests that 300/50 mg and 200/100 mg dosing are preferred candidate regimens in future clinical studies.

Population pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents

AIMS

To investigate atazanavir (ATV) population pharmacokinetics in children and adolescents, establish factors that influence ATV pharmacokinetics and investigate the ATV exposure after recommended doses.

METHODS

Atazanavir concentrations were measured in 51 children/adolescents during a mean therapeutic monitoring follow up of 6.6 months. A total of 151 ATV plasma concentrations were obtained, and a population pharmacokinetic model was developed with NONMEM. Patients received ATV alone or boosted with ritonavir.

RESULTS

Atazanavir pharmacokinetics was best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The effect of bodyweight was added on both apparent elimination clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution using allometric scaling. Atazanavir CL/F was reduced by ritonavir by 45%. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) co-medication (300 mg) increased significantly by 25% the atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) CL/F. Mean ATV/r CL/F values with or without TDF were 8.9 and 7.1 L h(-1) (70 kg)(-1), respectively. With the recommended 250/100 mg and 300/100 mg ATV/r doses, the exposure was higher than the mean adult steady-state exposure in the bodyweight range of 32-50 kg.

CONCLUSIONS

To target the mean adult exposure, children should receive the following once-daily ATV/r dose: 200/100 mg from 25 to 39 kg, 250/100 mg from 39 to 50 kg and 300/100 mg above 50 kg. When 300 mg TDF is co-administered, children should receive (ATV/r) at 250/100 mg between 35 and 39 kg, then 300/100 mg over 39 kg.

Atazanavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection

Atazanavir (Reyataz), a protease inhibitor (PI), is approved in many countries for use as a component of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for the treatment of adult, and in some countries in paediatric, patients with HIV-1 infection. ART regimens containing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir improved virological and immunological markers in adult patients with HIV-1 infection, and had similar efficacy to regimens containing lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients. In addition, unboosted atazanavir was noninferior to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in treatment-naive patients. Atazanavir is administered once daily and has a low capsule burden. Atazanavir, whether unboosted or boosted, was generally well tolerated and appeared to be associated with less marked metabolic effects, including less alteration of lipid levels, than other PIs. These properties mean that boosted atazanavir, and unboosted atazanavir in patients unable to tolerate ritonavir, continues to have a role as a component of ART regimens in patients with HIV-1 infection.

Population pharmacokinetics of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in HIV-infected patients and healthy volunteers

Objectives

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model to: (i) describe ritonavir-boosted atazanavir concentrations (300/100 mg once daily) and identify important covariates; and (ii) evaluate the predictive performance of the model for lower, unlicensed atazanavir doses (150 and 200 mg once daily) boosted with ritonavir (100 mg once daily).

Methods

Non-linear mixed effects modelling was applied to determine atazanavir pharmacokinetic parameters, inter-individual variability (IIV) and residual error. Covariates potentially related to atazanavir pharmacokinetics were explored. The final model was assessed by means of a visual predictive check for 300/100, 200/100 and 150/100 mg once daily.

Results

Forty-six individuals were included (30 HIV-infected). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag-time best described the data. Final estimates of apparent oral clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F) and absorption rate constant [relative standard error (%) and IIV (%)] were 7.7 L/h (5, 29), 103 L (13, 48) and 3.4 h⁻¹ (34, 154); a lag-time of 0.96 h (1) was determined. Ritonavir area under the curve (AUC_0–24) was the only significant covariate. Overall, 94%–97% of observed concentrations were within the 95% prediction intervals for all three regimens.

Conclusions

A population pharmacokinetic model for ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has been developed and validated. Ritonavir AUC_0–24 was significantly associated with atazanavir CL/F. The model was used to investigate other, particularly lower, ritonavir-boosted atazanavir dosing strategies.

Atazanavir: its role in HIV treatment

Azatanavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is a substrate and inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A and an inhibitor and inducer of P-glycoprotein. It has similar virologic efficacy as efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in antiretroviral-naive individuals. Its impact on lipids is less than other PIs and it is suitable for those in whom hyperlipidemia is undesirable. Ritonavir boosting of atazanavir enhances the bioavailability of atazanavir but may result in some elevation of lipids and is recommended for treatment-experienced patients and those receiving efavirenz or tenofovir. Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has similar antiviral activity as ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced patients. Atazanavir causes unconjugated bilirubinemia in over 40% of patients but results in less than 2% discontinuations. Atazanavir is licensed for once-daily use and atazanavir/ritonavir competes with lopinavir/ritonavir as the most commonly prescribed PI.

Decrease of atazanavir and lopinavir plasma concentrations in a boosted double human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor salvage regimen

The human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor combination of atazanavir (ATV)-lopinavir-ritonavir was reported to exhibit a mutual pharmacoenhancement of plasma lopinavir and ATV concentrations which may be beneficial for salvage patients. We identified 17 patients in our pharmacokinetic database taking this combination and found conflicting results. Plasma concentrations of both ATV and lopinavir were modestly, although not significantly, decreased when the drugs were coadministered. Therefore, patients should be selected carefully for this regimen and frequent clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring is strongly advised.

The Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of a Switch in Antiretroviral Therapy to Saquinavir, Ritonavir, and Atazanavir Alone for 48 Weeks and a Switch in the Saquinavir Formulation

BACKGROUND

Toxicities observed with current combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) warrant a search for novel options, such as class-sparing regimens. Ritonavir-boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI)-only regimens are such an option but are prone to pharmacokinetic interactions.

METHODS

This 48-week randomized study examined the safety and efficacy of a switch in CART to a once-daily regimen of saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV), and atazanavir (ATV) that did not include nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The study also assessed the pharmacokinetic profile of a change in the SQV formulation, from 200 mg to 500 mg, in 2 regimens (SQV-RTV twice per day plus NRTIs [arm 1] and SQV-RTV-ATV once per day without NRTIs [arm 2]) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects (plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA level, <50 copies/mL). Patients underwent an initial SQV formulation change or a CART change to SQV-RTV-ATV with intense pharmacokinetic sampling. All patients were subsequently assigned to receive SQV-RTV-ATV (1500, 100, and 300 mg once per day, respectively) without NRTIs for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who experienced virologic failure.

RESULTS

Of 25 subjects enrolled, scleral icterus was the most common adverse event (3 patients [12.5%]). Three subjects (12.5%) experienced virologic failure; and mean (+/- standard error of the mean) increase in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count was 63 +/- 36 cells/ mu L over 48 weeks (P=.012). The SQV geometric mean area under the time curve parameters were not significantly altered for the 2 SQV formulations (arm 1, 23.32 vs. 18.76 ngxh/mL [geometric mean ratio, 0.80] for the 200-mg vs. 500-mg formulations, respectively; arm 2, 50.31 vs. 44.79 ngxh/mL [geometric mean ratio, 0.88], for the 200-mg vs. 500-mg formulations, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A CART regimen of SQV-RTV-ATV alone demonstrated sustained virologic efficacy and was associated with significant increases in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count.

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, atazanavir, and ritonavir in a twice-daily boosted double-protease inhibitor regimen

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV), saquinavir (SQV), and ritonavir (RTV) in a boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI) therapy regimen without reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs). The study design was as follows. Patients with limited RTI options received a PI combination of 300/100 mg ATV/RTV once daily and 1,000 mg SQV twice daily (group 1; n=49) without RTI comedication. The results were compared to the plasma concentrations of PIs of patients taking either 300 mg ATV/100 mg RTV once daily plus RTIs (group 2; n=72) or patients taking 1,000 mg SQV/100 mg RTV plus RTIs (group 3; n=90). The study methods were as follows. Patients were given a 12/24-h pharmacokinetic assessment at steady state. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The minimum and maximum concentrations (Cmin and Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve under steady-state conditions (AUCss), elimination half-life, time of maximum concentration and lag time were subject to statistical analysis. The results show that patients treated with ATV/SQV/RTV exhibited significantly high SQV concentrations and moderate enhancement of the AUCss of ATV in comparison to those of patients of the control groups: for SQV in groups 1 and 3, the geometric mean (GM) of the AUCss was 22,794 versus 15,759 ng.h/ml (GM ratio [GMR]=1.45; P<0.05), the GM of the Cmax was 3,257 versus 2,331 ng/ml (GMR=1.40; P<0.05), and the GM of the Cmin was 438 versus 437 ng/ml (GMR=1.00); for ATV in groups 1 and 2, the GM of the AUCss was 39,154 versus 33,626 ng.h/ml (GMR=1.16), the GM of the Cmax was 3,488 versus 2,924 ng/ml (GMR=1.20), and the GM of the Cmin was 515 versus 428 ng/ml (GMR=1.21). RTV levels were comparable for all groups. A subgroup analysis detected only marginal differences in ATV plasma exposure if combined with tenofovir-disoproxilfumarate and without it. We conclude that our pharmacokinetic results support the use of a boosted double-PI regimen of ATV/SQV/RTV as a treatment option for patients who need antiretroviral therapy without RTIs.

A single centre cohort experience with a new once daily antiretroviral drug

BACKGROUND

Atazanavir, an azadipeptide protease inhibitor (PI) with once daily dosing, a lack of insulin resistance, lipid increase, and gastrointestinal toxicities, is approved in combination with other antiretrovirals for the treatment of patients infected with HIV. Unboosted atazanavir is also used in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) naive patients.

METHODS

The study prospectively followed up an established cohort of patients who received atazanavir, and for whom one year of follow up data were available.

RESULTS

It was found that use of atazanavir in intent to treat and on treatment analyses, maintained and led to virological suppression and increases in CD4 count in both PI naive and experienced patients. Virological failure occurred in 7% of patients and the main toxicity was hyperbilirubinaemia, which led to treatment withdrawal in 2%. Its efficacy and safety profile was similar to that seen in previous randomised studies investigating its use.

CONCLUSIONS

These data should provide reassurance for clinicians wishing to introduce a new antiretroviral into an established cohort.