Evolution of +1 programmed frameshifting signals and frameshift-regulating tRNAs in the order Saccharomycetales

Improved tools for live imaging of F-actin structures in yeast

For over 20 years, the most effective probe for live imaging of yeast actin cables has been Abp140-GFP. Here, we report that endogenously-tagged Abp140-GFP poorly decorates actin patches and cables in the bud compartment of yeast cells, while robustly decorating these structures in the mother cell. Using mutagenesis, we found that asymmetric decoration by Abp140 requires F-actin binding. By expressing integrated Bni1-Bnr1 and Bnr1-Bni1 chimeras, we demonstrate that asymmetric cable decoration by Abp140 also does not depend on which formin assembles the cables in each compartment. In contrast, the short actin-binding fragment of Abp140 (known as "Lifeact"), fused to 1x or 3xmNeonGreen and expressed from the endogenous ABP140 promoter, uniformly decorates patches and cables in both compartments. Further, this probe dramatically improves live imaging detection of cables (and patches) without altering their in vivo dynamics or cell growth. Improved detection allows us to visualize cables growing inward from the cell cortex and dynamically interacting with the vacuole. This probe also robustly decorates the cytokinetic actomyosin ring. Because Lifeact-3xmNeon expressed at relatively low levels provides intense labeling of cellular F-actin structures, this tool may improve live imaging in other organisms where higher levels of Lifeact expression are detrimental.

Frameshifting at collided ribosomes is modulated by elongation factor eEF3 and by integrated stress response regulators Gcn1 and Gcn20

Ribosome stalls can result in ribosome collisions that elicit quality control responses, one function of which is to prevent ribosome frameshifting, an activity that entails the interaction of the conserved yeast protein Mbf1 with uS3 on colliding ribosomes. However, the full spectrum of factors that mediate frameshifting during ribosome collisions is unknown. To delineate such factors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we used genetic selections for mutants that affect frameshifting from a known ribosome stall site, CGA codon repeats. We show that the general translation elongation factor eEF3 and the integrated stress response (ISR) pathway components Gcn1 and Gcn20 modulate frameshifting in opposing manners. We found a mutant form of eEF3 that specifically suppressed frameshifting, but not translation inhibition by CGA codons. Thus, we infer that frameshifting at collided ribosomes requires eEF3, which facilitates tRNA-mRNA translocation and E-site tRNA release in yeast and other single cell organisms. In contrast, we found that removal of either Gcn1 or Gcn20, which bind collided ribosomes with Mbf1, increased frameshifting. Thus, we conclude that frameshifting is suppressed by Gcn1 and Gcn20, although these effects are not mediated primarily through activation of the ISR. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between eEF3-mediated frameshifting and other quality control mechanisms, finding that Mbf1 requires either Hel2 or Gcn1 to suppress frameshifting with wild-type eEF3. Thus, these results provide evidence of a direct link between translation elongation and frameshifting at collided ribosomes, as well as evidence that frameshifting is constrained by quality control mechanisms that act on collided ribosomes.

Identification of Essential Genes and Fluconazole Susceptibility Genes in Candida glabrata by Profiling Hermes Transposon Insertions

Within the budding yeasts, the opportunistic pathogen Candida glabrata and other members of the Nakaseomyces clade have developed virulence traits independently from C. albicans and C. auris. To begin exploring the genetic basis of C. glabrata virulence and its innate resistance to antifungals, we launched the Hermes transposon from a plasmid and sequenced more than 500,000 different semi-random insertions throughout the genome. With machine learning, we identified 1278 protein-encoding genes (25% of total) that could not tolerate transposon insertions and are likely essential for C. glabrata fitness in vitro. Interestingly, genes involved in mRNA splicing were less likely to be essential in C. glabrata than their orthologs in S. cerevisiae, whereas the opposite is true for genes involved in kinetochore function and chromosome segregation. When a pool of insertion mutants was challenged with the first-line antifungal fluconazole, insertions in several known resistance genes (e.g., PDR1, CDR1, PDR16, PDR17, UPC2A, DAP1, STV1) and 15 additional genes (including KGD1, KGD2, YHR045W) became hypersensitive to fluconazole. Insertions in 200 other genes conferred significant resistance to fluconazole, two-thirds of which function in mitochondria and likely down-regulate Pdr1 expression or function. Knockout mutants of KGD2 and IDH2, which consume and generate alpha-ketoglutarate in mitochondria, exhibited increased and decreased resistance to fluconazole through a process that depended on Pdr1. These findings establish the utility of transposon insertion profiling in forward genetic investigations of this important pathogen of humans.

Ribosome Collisions Result in +1 Frameshifting in the Absence of No-Go Decay

During translation, an mRNA is typically occupied by multiple ribosomes sparsely distributed across the coding sequence. This distribution, mediated by slow rates of initiation relative to elongation, ensures that they rarely collide with each other, but given the stochastic nature of protein synthesis, collision events do occur. Recent work from our lab suggested that collisions signal for mRNA degradation through no-go decay (NGD). We have explored the impact of stalling on ribosome function when NGD is compromised and found it to result in +1 frameshifting. We used reporters that limit the number of ribosomes on a transcript to show that +1 frameshifting is induced through ribosome collision in yeast and bacteria. Furthermore, we observe a positive correlation between ribosome density and frameshifting efficiency. It is thus tempting to speculate that NGD, in addition to its role in mRNA quality control, evolved to cope with stochastic collision events to prevent deleterious frameshifting events.

Ribosome collisions, resulting from stalling, activate quality control processes to degrade the aberrant mRNA and the incomplete peptide. mRNA degradation proceeds through an endonucleolytic cleavage between the stacked ribosomes, which resolves the collisions. Simms et al. show that, when cleavage is inhibited, colliding ribosomes move out of frame.

Multi-protein bridging factor 1(Mbf1), Rps3 and Asc1 prevent stalled ribosomes from frameshifting

Reading frame maintenance is critical for accurate translation. We show that the conserved eukaryotic/archaeal protein Mbf1 acts with ribosomal proteins Rps3/uS3 and eukaryotic Asc1/RACK1 to prevent frameshifting at inhibitory CGA-CGA codon pairs in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutations in RPS3 that allow frameshifting implicate eukaryotic conserved residues near the mRNA entry site. Mbf1 and Rps3 cooperate to maintain the reading frame of stalled ribosomes, while Asc1 also mediates distinct events that result in recruitment of the ribosome quality control complex and mRNA decay. Frameshifting occurs through a +1 shift with a CGA codon in the P site and involves competition between codons entering the A site, implying that the wobble interaction of the P site codon destabilizes translation elongation. Thus, eukaryotes have evolved unique mechanisms involving both a universally conserved ribosome component and two eukaryotic-specific proteins to maintain the reading frame at ribosome stalls.

Proteins perform all the chemical reactions needed to keep a cell alive; thus, it is essential to assemble them correctly. They are made by molecular machines called ribosomes, which follow a sequence of instructions written in genetic code in molecules known as mRNAs. Ribosomes essentially read the genetic code three letters at a time; each triplet either codes for the insertion of one of 20 building blocks into the emerging protein, or serves as a signal to stop the process. It is critical that, after reading one triplet, the ribosome moves precisely three letters to read the next triplet. If, for example, the ribosome shifted just two letters instead of three – a phenomenon known as “frameshifting” – it would completely change the building blocks that were used to make the protein. This could lead to atypical or aberrant proteins that either do not work or are even toxic to the cell.

For a variety of reasons, ribosomes will often stall before they have finished building a protein. When this happens, the ribosome is more likely to frameshift. Cells commonly respond to stalled ribosomes by recruiting other molecules that work as quality control systems, some of which can disassemble the ribosome and break down the mRNA. In budding yeast, one part of the ribosome – named Asc1 – plays a key role in recruiting these quality control systems and in mRNA breakdown. If this component is removed, stalled ribosomes frameshift more frequently and, as a result, aberrant proteins accumulate in the cell. Since the Asc1 recruiter protein sits on the outside of the ribosome, it seemed likely that it might act through other factors to stop the ribosome from frameshifting when it stalls. However, it was unknown if such factors exist, what they are, or how they might work.

Now, Wang et al. have identified two additional yeast proteins, named Mbf1 and Rps3, which cooperate to stop the ribosome from frameshifting after it stalls. Rps3, like Asc1, is a component of the ribosome, while Mbf1 is not. It appears that Rps3 likely stops frameshifting via an interaction with the incoming mRNA, because a region of Rps3 near the mRNA entry site to the ribosome is important for its activity. Further experiments then showed that the known Asc1-mediated breakdown of mRNAs did not depend on Mbf1 and Rps3, but also assists in stopping frameshifting. Thus, frameshifting of stalled ribosomes is prevented via two distinct ways: one that directly involves Mbf1 and Rps3 and one that is promoted by Asc1, which reduces the amounts of mRNAs on which ribosomes frameshift.

These newly identified factors may provide insights into the precisely controlled protein-production machinery in the cell and into roles of the quality control systems. An improved understanding of mechanisms that prevent frameshifting could eventually lead to better treatments for some human diseases that result when these processes go awry, which include certain neurological conditions.

Translation Elongation and Recoding in Eukaryotes

In this review, we highlight the current understanding of translation elongation and recoding in eukaryotes. In addition to providing an overview of the process, recent advances in our understanding of the role of the factor eIF5A in both translation elongation and termination are discussed. We also highlight mechanisms of translation recoding with a focus on ribosomal frameshifting during elongation. We see that the balance between the basic steps in elongation and the less common recoding events is determined by the kinetics of the different processes as well as by specific sequence determinants.

Evolutionary restoration of fertility in an interspecies hybrid yeast, by whole-genome duplication after a failed mating-type switch

Many interspecies hybrids have been discovered in yeasts, but most of these hybrids are asexual and can replicate only mitotically. Whole-genome duplication has been proposed as a mechanism by which interspecies hybrids can regain fertility, restoring their ability to perform meiosis and sporulate. Here, we show that this process occurred naturally during the evolution of Zygosaccharomyces parabailii, an interspecies hybrid that was formed by mating between 2 parents that differed by 7% in genome sequence and by many interchromosomal rearrangements. Surprisingly, Z. parabailii has a full sexual cycle and is genetically haploid. It goes through mating-type switching and autodiploidization, followed by immediate sporulation. We identified the key evolutionary event that enabled Z. parabailii to regain fertility, which was breakage of 1 of the 2 homeologous copies of the mating-type (MAT) locus in the hybrid, resulting in a chromosomal rearrangement and irreparable damage to 1 MAT locus. This rearrangement was caused by HO endonuclease, which normally functions in mating-type switching. With 1 copy of MAT inactivated, the interspecies hybrid now behaves as a haploid. Our results provide the first demonstration that MAT locus damage is a naturally occurring evolutionary mechanism for whole-genome duplication and restoration of fertility to interspecies hybrids. The events that occurred in Z. parabailii strongly resemble those postulated to have caused ancient whole-genome duplication in an ancestor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

It has recently been proposed that the whole-genome duplication (WGD) event that occurred during evolution of an ancestor of the yeast S. cerevisiae was the result of a hybridization between 2 parental yeast species that were significantly divergent in DNA sequence, followed by a doubling of the genome content to restore the hybrid’s ability to make viable spores. However, the molecular details of how genome doubling could occur in a hybrid were unclear because most known interspecies hybrid yeasts have no sexual cycle. We show here that Z. parabailii provides an almost exact precedent for the steps proposed to have occurred during the S. cerevisiae WGD. Two divergent haploid parental species, each with 8 chromosomes, mated to form a hybrid that was initially sterile but regained fertility when 1 copy of its mating-type locus became damaged by the mating-type switching apparatus. As a result of this damage, the Z. parabailii life cycle now consists of a 16-chromosome haploid phase and a transient 32-chromosome diploid phase. Each pair of homeologous genes behaves as 2 independent Mendelian loci during meiosis.

Factors That Shape Eukaryotic tRNAomes: Processing, Modification and Anticodon-Codon Use

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) contain sequence diversity beyond their anticodons and the large variety of nucleotide modifications found in all kingdoms of life. Some modifications stabilize structure and fit in the ribosome whereas those to the anticodon loop modulate messenger RNA (mRNA) decoding activity more directly. The identities of tRNAs with some universal anticodon loop modifications vary among distant and parallel species, likely to accommodate fine tuning for their translation systems. This plasticity in positions 34 (wobble) and 37 is reflected in codon use bias. Here, we review convergent evidence that suggest that expansion of the eukaryotic tRNAome was supported by its dedicated RNA polymerase III transcription system and coupling to the precursor-tRNA chaperone, La protein. We also review aspects of eukaryotic tRNAome evolution involving G34/A34 anticodon-sparing, relation to A34 modification to inosine, biased codon use and regulatory information in the redundancy (synonymous) component of the genetic code. We then review interdependent anticodon loop modifications involving position 37 in eukaryotes. This includes the eukaryote-specific tRNA modification, 3-methylcytidine-32 (m³C₃₂) and the responsible gene, TRM140 and homologs which were duplicated and subspecialized for isoacceptor-specific substrates and dependence on i⁶A₃₇ or t⁶A₃₇. The genetics of tRNA function is relevant to health directly and as disease modifiers.

Evolving specificity of tRNA 3-methyl-cytidine-32 (m3C32) modification: a subset of tRNAsSer requires N6-isopentenylation of A37

Post-transcriptional modifications of anticodon loop (ACL) nucleotides impact tRNA structure, affinity for the ribosome, and decoding activity, and these activities can be fine-tuned by interactions between nucleobases on either side of the anticodon. A recently discovered ACL modification circuit involving positions 32, 34, and 37 is disrupted by a human disease-associated mutation to the gene encoding a tRNA modification enzyme. We used tRNA-HydroSeq (-HySeq) to examine (3)methyl-cytidine-32 (m(3)C32), which is found in yeast only in the ACLs of tRNAs(Ser) and tRNAs(Thr) In contrast to that reported for Saccharomyces cerevisiae in which all m(3)C32 depends on a single gene, TRM140, the m(3)C32 of tRNAs(Ser) and tRNAs(Thr) of the fission yeast S. pombe, are each dependent on one of two related genes, trm140(+) and trm141(+), homologs of which are found in higher eukaryotes. Interestingly, mammals and other vertebrates contain a third homolog and also contain m(3)C at new sites, positions 32 on tRNAs(Arg) and C47:3 in the variable arm of tRNAs(Ser) More significantly, by examining S. pombe mutants deficient for other modifications, we found that m(3)C32 on the three tRNAs(Ser) that contain anticodon base A36, requires N(6)-isopentenyl modification of A37 (i(6)A37). This new C32-A37 ACL circuitry indicates that i(6)A37 is a pre- or corequisite for m(3)C32 on these tRNAs. Examination of the tRNA database suggests that such circuitry may be more expansive than observed here. The results emphasize two contemporary themes, that tRNA modifications are interconnected, and that some specific modifications on tRNAs of the same anticodon identity are species-specific.

Ribosomal frameshifting and transcriptional slippage: From genetic steganography and cryptography to adventitious use

Genetic decoding is not ‘frozen’ as was earlier thought, but dynamic. One facet of this is frameshifting that often results in synthesis of a C-terminal region encoded by a new frame. Ribosomal frameshifting is utilized for the synthesis of additional products, for regulatory purposes and for translational ‘correction’ of problem or ‘savior’ indels. Utilization for synthesis of additional products occurs prominently in the decoding of mobile chromosomal element and viral genomes. One class of regulatory frameshifting of stable chromosomal genes governs cellular polyamine levels from yeasts to humans. In many cases of productively utilized frameshifting, the proportion of ribosomes that frameshift at a shift-prone site is enhanced by specific nascent peptide or mRNA context features. Such mRNA signals, which can be 5′ or 3′ of the shift site or both, can act by pairing with ribosomal RNA or as stem loops or pseudoknots even with one component being 4 kb 3′ from the shift site. Transcriptional realignment at slippage-prone sequences also generates productively utilized products encoded trans-frame with respect to the genomic sequence. This too can be enhanced by nucleic acid structure. Together with dynamic codon redefinition, frameshifting is one of the forms of recoding that enriches gene expression.

Eight new mtDNA sequences of glass sponges reveal an extensive usage of +1 frameshifting in mitochondrial translation

Three previously studied mitochondrial genomes of glass sponges (phylum Porifera, class Hexactinellida) contained single nucleotide insertions in protein coding genes inferred as sites of +1 translational frameshifting. To investigate the distribution and evolution of these sites and to help elucidate the mechanism of frameshifting, we determined eight new complete or nearly complete mtDNA sequences from glass sponges and examined individual mitochondrial genes from three others. We found nine new instances of single nucleotide insertions in these sequences and analyzed them both comparatively and phylogenetically. The base insertions appear to have been gained and lost repeatedly in hexactinellid mt protein genes, suggesting no functional significance for the frameshifting sites. A high degree of sequence conservation, the presence of unusual tRNAs, and a distinct pattern of codon usage suggest the "out-of-frame pairing" model of translational frameshifting. Additionally, we provide evidence that relaxed selection pressure on glass sponge mtDNA - possibly a result of their low growth rates and deep-water lifestyle - has allowed frameshift insertions to be tolerated for hundreds of millions of years. Our study provides the first example of a phylogenetically diverse and extensive usage of translational frameshifting in animal mitochondrial coding sequences.

Ribosomal frameshifting used in influenza A virus expression occurs within the sequence UCC_UUU_CGU and is in the +1 direction

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting is used in the expression of many virus genes and some cellular genes. In eukaryotic systems, the most well-characterized mechanism involves -1 tandem tRNA slippage on an X_XXY_YYZ motif. By contrast, the mechanisms involved in programmed +1 (or -2) slippage are more varied and often poorly characterized. Recently, a novel gene, PA-X, was discovered in influenza A virus and found to be expressed via a shift to the +1 reading frame. Here, we identify, by mass spectrometric analysis, both the site (UCC_UUU_CGU) and direction (+1) of the frameshifting that is involved in PA-X expression. Related sites are identified in other virus genes that have previously been proposed to be expressed via +1 frameshifting. As these viruses infect insects (chronic bee paralysis virus), plants (fijiviruses and amalgamaviruses) and vertebrates (influenza A virus), such motifs may form a new class of +1 frameshift-inducing sequences that are active in diverse eukaryotes.

Mechanisms and implications of programmed translational frameshifting

While ribosomes must maintain translational reading frame in order to translate primary genetic information into polypeptides, cis‐acting signals located in mRNAs represent higher order information content that can be used to fine‐tune gene expression. Classes of signals have been identified that direct a fraction of elongating ribosomes to shift reading frame by one base in the 5′ (−1) or 3′ (+1) direction. This is called programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF). Although mechanisms of PRF differ, a common feature is induction of ribosome pausing, which alters kinetic partitioning rates between in‐frame and out‐of‐frame codons at specific ‘slippery’ sequences. Many viruses use PRF to ensure synthesis of the correct ratios of virus‐encoded proteins required for proper viral particle assembly and maturation, thus identifying PRF as an attractive target for antiviral therapeutics. In contrast, recent studies indicate that PRF signals may primarily function as mRNA destabilizing elements in cellular mRNAs. These studies suggest that PRF may be used to fine‐tune gene expression through mRNA decay pathways. The possible regulation of PRF by noncoding RNAs is also discussed. WIREs RNA 2012 doi: 10.1002/wrna.1126

This article is categorized under: 1

RNA Structure and Dynamics > Influence of RNA Structure in Biological Systems

2

RNA Evolution and Genomics > Computational Analyses of RNA

3

Translation > Translation Regulation

Transfer RNA methytransferases and their corresponding modifications in budding yeast and humans: activities, predications, and potential roles in human health

Throughout the kingdoms of life, transfer RNA (tRNA) undergoes over 100 enzyme-catalyzed, methyl-based modifications. Although a majority of the methylations are conserved from bacteria to mammals, the functions of a number of these modifications are unknown. Many of the proteins responsible for tRNA methylation, named tRNA methyltransferases (Trms), have been characterized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast, only a few human Trms have been characterized. A BLAST search for human homologs of each S. cerevisiae Trm revealed a total of 34 human proteins matching our search criteria for an S. cerevisiae Trm homolog candidate. We have compiled a database cataloging basic information about each human and yeast Trm. Every S. cerevisiae Trm has at least one human homolog, while several Trms have multiple candidates. A search of cancer cell versus normal cell mRNA expression studies submitted to Oncomine found that 30 of the homolog genes display a significant change in mRNA expression levels in at least one data set. While 6 of the 34 human homolog candidates have confirmed tRNA methylation activity, the other candidates remain uncharacterized. We believe that our database will serve as a resource for investigating the role of human Trms in cellular stress signaling.

Cotranslational transport of ABP140 mRNA to the distal pole of S. cerevisiae

In budding yeast, several mRNAs are selectively transported into the daughter cell in an actin-dependent manner by a specialized myosin system, the SHE machinery. With ABP140 mRNA, we now describe the first mRNA that is transported in the opposite direction and localizes to the distal pole of the mother cell, independent of the SHE machinery. Distal pole localization is not observed in mutants devoid of actin cables and can be disrupted by latrunculin A. Furthermore, localization of ABP140 mRNA requires the N-terminal actin-binding domain of Abp140p to be expressed. By replacing the N-terminal localization motif, ABP140 mRNA can be retargeted to different subcellular structures. In addition, accumulation of the mRNA at the distal pole can be prevented by disruption of polysomes. Using the MS2 system, the mRNA was found to associate with actin cables and to follow actin cable dynamics. We therefore propose a model of translational coupling, in which ABP140 mRNA is tethered to actin cables via its nascent protein product and is transported to the distal pole by actin retrograde flow.

A domain of the actin binding protein Abp140 is the yeast methyltransferase responsible for 3-methylcytidine modification in the tRNA anti-codon loop

The 3-methylcytidine (m³C) modification is widely found in eukaryotic species of tRNA(Ser), tRNA(Thr), and tRNA(Arg); at residue 32 in the anti-codon loop; and at residue e2 in the variable stem of tRNA(Ser). Little is known about the function of this modification or about the specificity of the corresponding methyltransferase, since the gene has not been identified. We have used a primer extension assay to screen a battery of methyltransferase candidate knockout strains in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and find that tRNA(Thr(IGU)) from abp140-Δ strains lacks m³C. Curiously, Abp140p is composed of a poorly conserved N-terminal ORF fused by a programed +1 frameshift in budding yeasts to a C-terminal ORF containing an S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) domain that is highly conserved among eukaryotes. We show that ABP140 is required for m³C modification of substrate tRNAs, since primer extension is similarly affected for all tRNA species expected to have m³C and since quantitative analysis shows explicitly that tRNA(Thr(IGU)) from an abp140-Δ strain lacks m³C. We also show that Abp140p (now named Trm140p) purified after expression in yeast or Escherichia coli has m³C methyltransferase activity, which is specific for tRNA(Thr(IGU)) and not tRNA(Phe) and occurs specifically at C₃₂. We suggest that the C-terminal ORF of Trm140p is necessary and sufficient for activity in vivo and in vitro, based on analysis of constructs deleted for most or all of the N-terminal ORF. We also suggest that m³C has a role in translation, since trm140-Δ trm1-Δ strains (also lacking m²,²G₂₆) are sensitive to low concentrations of cycloheximide.

Actin-binding protein ABP140 is a methyltransferase for 3-methylcytidine at position 32 of tRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Transfer RNAs contain various modified nucleotides that are introduced enzymatically at the post-transcriptional level. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 3-methylcytidine (m³C) is found at position 32 of the tRNAs for Thr and Ser. We used a systematic reverse genetic approach combined with mass spectrometry (ribonucleome analysis), and identified the actin-binding protein ABP140 as the protein responsible for m³C formation in both tRNA(Thr1) and tRNA(Ser1). ABP140 consists of an N-terminal actin-binding sequence and a C-terminal S-adenosylmethionine (Ado-Met) binding motif. Deletion of the actin-binding sequence in ABP140 did not affect m³C formation, indicating that subcellular localization of ABP140 to actin filaments is not involved in tRNA modification. m³C formation in tRNA(Thr1) could be reconstituted using recombinant Abp140p in the presence of Ado-Met, whereas m³C did not form in tRNA(Ser1) in vitro, indicating the absence of a factor(s) required for tRNA(Ser1) m³C formation. Thus, ABP140 has been designated TRM140 according to the preferred nomenclature. In addition, we observed a specific reduction of m³C formation in HeLa cells by siRNA-mediated knock down of the human ortholog of TRM140.

Control of translation efficiency in yeast by codon-anticodon interactions

The choice of synonymous codons used to encode a polypeptide contributes to substantial differences in translation efficiency between genes. However, both the magnitude and the mechanisms of codon-mediated effects are unknown, as neither the effects of individual codons nor the parameters that modulate codon-mediated regulation are understood, particularly in eukaryotes. To explore this problem in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we performed the first systematic analysis of codon effects on expression. We find that the arginine codon CGA is strongly inhibitory, resulting in progressively and sharply reduced expression with increased CGA codon dosage. CGA-mediated inhibition of expression is primarily due to wobble decoding of CGA, since it is nearly completely suppressed by coexpression of an exact match anticodon-mutated tRNA(Arg(UCG)), and is associated with generation of a smaller RNA fragment, likely due to endonucleolytic cleavage at a stalled ribosome. Moreover, CGA codon pairs are more effective inhibitors of expression than individual CGA codons. These results directly implicate decoding by the ribosome and interactions at neighboring sites within the ribosome as mediators of codon-specific translation efficiency.

Origin and fate of pseudogenes in Hemiascomycetes: a comparative analysis

Background

Pseudogenes are ubiquitous genetic elements that derive from functional genes after mutational inactivation. Characterization of pseudogenes is important to understand genome dynamics and evolution, and its significance increases when several genomes of related organisms can be compared. Among yeasts, only the genome of the S. cerevisiae reference strain has been analyzed so far for pseudogenes.

Results

We present here the first comparative analysis of pseudogenes within the fully sequenced and annotated genomes of eight yeast species, spanning the entire phylogenetic range of Hemiascomycetes. A total of 871 pseudogenes were found, out of which mutational degradation patterns and consequences on the genetic repertoire of each species could be identified. We found that most pseudogenes in yeasts originate from mutational degradation of gene copies formed after species-specific duplications but duplications of pseudogenes themselves are also encountered. In all yeasts, except in Y. lipolytica, pseudogenes tend to cluster in subtelomeric regions where they can outnumber the number of functional genes from 3 to 16 times. Pseudogenes are generally not conserved between the yeast species studied (except in two cases), consistent with their large evolutionary distances, but tend to be conserved among S. cerevisiae strains. Reiterated pseudogenization of some genes is often observed in different lineages and may affect functions essential in S. cerevisiae, which are, therefore, lost in other species. Although a variety of functions are affected by pseudogenization, there is a bias towards functions involved in the adaptation of the yeasts to their environment, and towards genes of unknown functions.

Conclusions

Our work illustrates for the first time the formation of pseudogenes in different branches of hemiascomycetous yeasts, showing their limited conservation and how they testify for the adaptation of the yeasts functional repertoires.

Recoding of translation in turtle mitochondrial genomes: programmed frameshift mutations and evidence of a modified genetic code

A +1 frameshift insertion has been documented in the mitochondrial gene nad3 in some birds and reptiles. By sequencing polyadenylated mRNA of the chicken (Gallus gallus), we have shown that the extra nucleotide is transcribed and is present in mature mRNA. Evidence from other animal mitochondrial genomes has led us to hypothesize that certain mitochondrial translation systems have the ability to tolerate frameshift insertions using programmed translational frameshifting. To investigate this, we sequenced the mitochondrial genome of the red-eared slider turtle (Trachemys scripta), where both the widespread nad3 frameshift insertion and a novel site in nad4l were found. Sequencing the region surrounding the insertion in nad3 in a number of other turtles and tortoises reveal general mitochondrial +1 programmed frameshift site features as well as the apparent redefinition of a stop codon in Parker’s snake-neck turtle (Chelodina parkeri), the first known example of this in vertebrate mitochondria.

The mitochondrial genome of the hexactinellid sponge Aphrocallistes vastus: evidence for programmed translational frameshifting

Background

Mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) of numerous sponges have been sequenced as part of an ongoing effort to resolve the class-level phylogeny of the Porifera, as well as to place the various lower metazoan groups on the animal-kingdom tree. Most recently, the partial mtDNA of two glass sponges, class Hexactinellida, were reported. While previous phylogenetic estimations based on these data remain uncertain due to insufficient taxon sampling and accelerated rates of evolution, the mtDNA molecules themselves reveal interesting traits that may be unique to hexactinellids. Here we determined the first complete mitochondrial genome of a hexactinellid sponge, Aphrocallistes vastus, and compared it to published poriferan mtDNAs to further describe characteristics specific to hexactinellid and other sponge mitochondrial genomes.

Results

The A. vastus mtDNA consisted of a 17,427 base pair circular molecule containing thirteen protein-coding genes, divergent large and small subunit ribosomal RNAs, and a reduced set of 18 tRNAs. The A. vastus mtDNA showed a typical hexactinellid nucleotide composition and shared a large synteny with the other sequenced glass sponge mtDNAs. It also contained an unidentified open reading frame and large intergenic space region. Two frameshifts, in the cox3 and nad6 genes, were not corrected by RNA editing, but rather possessed identical shift sites marked by the extremely rare tryptophan codon (UGG) followed by the common glycine codon (GGA) in the +1 frame.

Conclusion

Hexactinellid mtDNAs have shown similar trends in gene content, nucleotide composition, and codon usage, and have retained a large gene syntenty. Analysis of the mtDNA of A. vastus has provided evidence diagnostic for +1 programmed translational frameshifting, a phenomenon disparately reported throughout the animal kingdom, but present in the hexactinellid mtDNAs that have been sequenced to date.

An mRNA sequence derived from the yeast EST3 gene stimulates programmed +1 translational frameshifting

Programmed translational frameshift sites are sequences in mRNAs that promote frequent stochastic changes in translational reading frame allowing expression of alternative forms of protein products. The EST3 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encoding a subunit of telomerase, uses a programmed +1 frameshift site in its expression. We show that the site is complex, consisting of a heptameric sequence at which the frameshift occurs and a downstream 27-nucleotide stimulator sequence that increases frameshifting eightfold. The stimulator appears to be modular, composed of at least three separable domains. It increases frameshifting only when ribosomes pause at the frameshift site because of a limiting supply of a cognate aminoacyl-tRNA and not when pausing occurs at a nonsense codon. These data suggest that the EST3 stimulator may modulate access by aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosomal A site by interacting with several targets in a ribosome paused during elongation.