1
|
Peirone S, Tirtei E, Campello A, Parlato C, Guarrera S, Mareschi K, Marini E, Asaftei SD, Bertero L, Papotti M, Priante F, Perrone S, Cereda M, Fagioli F. Impaired neutrophil-mediated cell death drives Ewing's Sarcoma in the background of Down syndrome. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1429833. [PMID: 39421445 PMCID: PMC11484044 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1429833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Ewing Sarcoma (EWS) has been reported in seven children with Down syndrome (DS). To date, a detailed assessment of this solid tumour in DS patients is yet to be made. Methods Here, we characterise a chemo-resistant mediastinal EWS in a 2-year-old DS child, the youngest ever reported case, by exploiting sequencing approaches. Results The tumour showed a neuroectodermal development driven by the EWSR1-FLI1 fusion. The inherited myeloperoxidase deficiency of the patient caused failure of neutrophil-mediated cell death and promoted genomic instability. Discussion In this context, the tumour underwent genome-wide near haploidisation resulting in a massive overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Recruitment of defective neutrophils fostered rapid evolution of this EWS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Peirone
- Department of Biosciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Elisa Tirtei
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Campello
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Caterina Parlato
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Simonetta Guarrera
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Katia Mareschi
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Marini
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Papotti
- Pathology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Priante
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Sarah Perrone
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Matteo Cereda
- Department of Biosciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, c/o IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Franca Fagioli
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Regina Margherita Children’s Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Deininger K, Korf P, Lauber L, Grimm R, Strecker R, Steinacker J, Lisson CS, Mühling BM, Schmidtke-Schrezenmeier G, Rasche V, Speidel T, Glatting G, Beer M, Beer AJ, Thaiss W. From Phantoms to Patients: Improved Fusion and Voxel-Wise Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and FDG-Positron Emission Tomography in Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Combined Metabolic-Diffusivity Index (cDMI). Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1787. [PMID: 39202275 PMCID: PMC11353375 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14161787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) opens new possibilities in multimodal multiparametric (m2p) image analyses. But even the simultaneous acquisition of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not guarantee perfect voxel-by-voxel co-registration due to organs and distortions, especially in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which would be, however, crucial to derive biologically meaningful information. Thus, our aim was to optimize fusion and voxel-wise analyses of DWI and standardized uptake values (SUVs) using a novel software for m2p analyses. Using research software, we evaluated the precision of image co-registration and voxel-wise analyses including the rigid and elastic 3D registration of DWI and [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET from an integrated PET/MR system. We analyzed DWI distortions with a volume-preserving constraint in three different 3D-printed phantom models. A total of 12 PET/MR-DWI clinical datasets (bronchial carcinoma patients) were referenced to the T1 weighted-DIXON sequence. Back mapping of scatterplots and voxel-wise registration was performed and compared to the non-optimized datasets. Fusion was rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Using the 3D-elastic co-registration algorithm, geometric shapes were restored in phantom measurements; the measured ADC values did not change significantly (F = 1.12, p = 0.34). Reader assessment showed a significant improvement in fusion precision for DWI and morphological landmarks in the 3D-registered datasets (4.3 ± 0.2 vs. 4.6 ± 0.2, p = 0.009). Most pronounced differences were noted for the chest wall (p = 0.006), tumor (p = 0.007), and skin contour (p = 0.014). Co-registration increased the number of plausible ADC and SUV combinations by 25%. The volume-preserving elastic 3D registration of DWI significantly improved the precision of fusion with anatomical sequences in phantom and clinical datasets. The research software allowed for a voxel-wise analysis and visualization of [18F]FDG-PET/MR data as a "combined diffusivity-metabolic index" (cDMI). The clinical value of the optimized PET/MR biomarker can thus be tested in future PET/MR studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick Korf
- Siemens Healthineers AG, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Leonard Lauber
- Experimental Cardiovascular Imaging (ExCaVI), Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Robert Grimm
- Siemens Healthineers AG, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jochen Steinacker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Catharina S. Lisson
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Bernd M. Mühling
- Section Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Volker Rasche
- Experimental Cardiovascular Imaging (ExCaVI), Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Center for Translational Imaging (MoMAN), Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Tobias Speidel
- Experimental Cardiovascular Imaging (ExCaVI), Department of Internal Medicine II, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Center for Translational Imaging (MoMAN), Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Gerhard Glatting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Meinrad Beer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Center for Translational Imaging (MoMAN), Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Core Facility PET/MR, Medical Faculty, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Ambros J. Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Center for Translational Imaging (MoMAN), Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Core Facility PET/MR, Medical Faculty, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Thaiss
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Center for Translational Imaging (MoMAN), Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- Core Facility PET/MR, Medical Faculty, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu H, Zou M, Wu D, Li B, Su Y, Li Y, Hong S, Yang Z. Quantitative assessment of extraocular muscles in Graves' ophthalmopathy using T1 mapping. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:9074-9083. [PMID: 37466707 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09931-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of T1 mapping in the characterization of extraocular muscles (EOMs) of Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) patients and investigate its feasibility in assessing the response to glucocorticoid therapy in active GO patients. METHODS A total of 133 participants (78 active GO, 23 inactive GO, 18 Graves' disease (GD) patients, and 14 healthy volunteers) were consecutively enrolled from July 2018 to December 2020. Native T1 (nT1) and postcontrast T1 (cT1) values of EOMs were measured and compared. The variations in T1 mapping metrics of EOMs were compared pre/post glucocorticoid treatment in 23 follow-up active GO patients. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed. RESULTS The nT1 of EOMs in GO patients was higher than that in GD patients and healthy volunteers. The nT1 of superior rectus (SR) in active GO was higher than that in inactive GO patients, and it could be used as a potential marker of GO activity (OR: 1.003; 95% CI: 1.001, 1.004), with a diagnostic sensitivity of 86.3% and specificity of 43.7%. Meanwhile, the cT1 of SR, inferior rectus (IR), and medial rectus (MR) in inactive GO patients were higher than those in active GO patients. The nT1 of EOMs achieved sufficient diagnostic performance in evaluating the response to glucocorticoid therapy for follow-up active GO patients (AUC, 0.797; sensitivity, 71.9%; specificity, 85.7%). CONCLUSIONS T1 mapping could quantitatively assess the activity of GO and the response to glucocorticoid therapy in active GO patients and may even potentially reflect the fibrosis of EOMs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT T1 values can reflect the pathological status of the extraocular muscle. T1 mapping could help to quantitatively assess the clinical activity of GO and the response to glucocorticoid therapy in active GO patients. KEY POINTS • Graves' ophthalmopathy patients had greater nT1 of extraocular muscles than Graves' disease patients and healthy volunteers, and nT1 of the superior rectus could be a potential marker of Graves' ophthalmopathy activity. • The cT1 of extraocular muscles in inactive Graves' ophthalmopathy patients was higher than that in active Graves' ophthalmopathy patients, and it might be associated with muscle fibrosis. • nT1 of extraocular muscles could offer sufficient diagnostic performance in evaluating the response to glucocorticoid therapy for follow-up active Graves' ophthalmopathy patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzhang Zhu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mengsha Zou
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dide Wu
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Li
- Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yihua Su
- Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanbing Li
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shubin Hong
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Zhiyun Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bailey DL, Pichler BJ, Gückel B, Antoch G, Barthel H, Bhujwalla ZM, Biskup S, Biswal S, Bitzer M, Boellaard R, Braren RF, Brendle C, Brindle K, Chiti A, la Fougère C, Gillies R, Goh V, Goyen M, Hacker M, Heukamp L, Knudsen GM, Krackhardt AM, Law I, Morris JC, Nikolaou K, Nuyts J, Ordonez AA, Pantel K, Quick HH, Riklund K, Sabri O, Sattler B, Troost EGC, Zaiss M, Zender L, Beyer T. Combined PET/MRI: Global Warming-Summary Report of the 6th International Workshop on PET/MRI, March 27-29, 2017, Tübingen, Germany. Mol Imaging Biol 2018; 20:4-20. [PMID: 28971346 PMCID: PMC5775351 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-017-1123-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The 6th annual meeting to address key issues in positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was held again in Tübingen, Germany, from March 27 to 29, 2017. Over three days of invited plenary lectures, round table discussions and dialogue board deliberations, participants critically assessed the current state of PET/MRI, both clinically and as a research tool, and attempted to chart future directions. The meeting addressed the use of PET/MRI and workflows in oncology, neurosciences, infection, inflammation and chronic pain syndromes, as well as deeper discussions about how best to characterise the tumour microenvironment, optimise the complementary information available from PET and MRI, and how advanced data mining and bioinformatics, as well as information from liquid biomarkers (circulating tumour cells and nucleic acids) and pathology, can be integrated to give a more complete characterisation of disease phenotype. Some issues that have dominated previous meetings, such as the accuracy of MR-based attenuation correction (AC) of the PET scan, were finally put to rest as having been adequately addressed for the majority of clinical situations. Likewise, the ability to standardise PET systems for use in multicentre trials was confirmed, thus removing a perceived barrier to larger clinical imaging trials. The meeting openly questioned whether PET/MRI should, in all cases, be used as a whole-body imaging modality or whether in many circumstances it would best be employed to give an in-depth study of previously identified disease in a single organ or region. The meeting concluded that there is still much work to be done in the integration of data from different fields and in developing a common language for all stakeholders involved. In addition, the participants advocated joint training and education for individuals who engage in routine PET/MRI. It was agreed that PET/MRI can enhance our understanding of normal and disrupted biology, and we are in a position to describe the in vivo nature of disease processes, metabolism, evolution of cancer and the monitoring of response to pharmacological interventions and therapies. As such, PET/MRI is a key to advancing medicine and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B J Pichler
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - B Gückel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - H Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Z M Bhujwalla
- Division of Cancer Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - S Biskup
- Praxis für Humangenetik Tübingen, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 23, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S Biswal
- Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS) and Bio-X, Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Bitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - R Boellaard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R F Braren
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - C Brendle
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - K Brindle
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, UK
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - C la Fougère
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - R Gillies
- Department of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, 33621, USA
| | - V Goh
- Cancer Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospitals London, London, UK
| | - M Goyen
- GE Healthcare GmbH, Beethovenstrasse 239, Solingen, Germany
| | - M Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - G M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A M Krackhardt
- III. Medical Department, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - I Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - K Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J Nuyts
- Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A A Ordonez
- Department of Pediatrics, Center for Infection and Inflammation Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - K Pantel
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - H H Quick
- High Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MR Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - K Riklund
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | - O Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - B Sattler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - E G C Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Zaiss
- High Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
| | - L Zender
- Department of Internal Medicine VIII, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Group, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, 4L, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beyer T, Hacker M, Goh V. PET/MRI-knocking on the doors of the rich and famous. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170347. [PMID: 28707543 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Since 2010 the portfolio of positron emission tomography (PET)-based imaging has been expanded by industry with the introduction of combined whole-body PET/MRI systems with the intent of merging PET-based molecular imaging with the strengths of MRI. PET/MRI has created a lot of hype in the scientific community but comparatively little traction in the clinic. The first years of whole-body PET/MRI were used to address inherent technical challenges; however, it is now time to make use of the full potential of this integrated imaging modality. This opinion piece highlights the continuing challenges for the clinical adoption of PET/MRI and cautions against putting too much emphasis on comparisons with clinical PET/CT. In order for PET/MRI to enter clinical practice, cross-specialty co-operation must be pursued with rigour and use-case scenarios must be propagated, following long-awaited expansion of reimbursement strategies and protocol standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Beyer
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, QIMP Group , Vienna , Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Vicky Goh
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bailey DL, Pichler BJ, Gückel B, Barthel H, Beer AJ, Botnar R, Gillies R, Goh V, Gotthardt M, Hicks RJ, Lanzenberger R, la Fougere C, Lentschig M, Nekolla SG, Niederdraenk T, Nikolaou K, Nuyts J, Olego D, Riklund KÅ, Signore A, Schäfers M, Sossi V, Suminski M, Veit-Haibach P, Umutlu L, Wissmeyer M, Beyer T. Combined PET/MRI: from Status Quo to Status Go. Summary Report of the Fifth International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 15-19, 2016; Tübingen, Germany. Mol Imaging Biol 2016; 18:637-50. [PMID: 27534971 PMCID: PMC5010606 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-016-0993-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This article provides a collaborative perspective of the discussions and conclusions from the fifth international workshop of combined positron emission tomorgraphy (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that was held in Tübingen, Germany, from February 15 to 19, 2016. Specifically, we summarise the second part of the workshop made up of invited presentations from active researchers in the field of PET/MRI and associated fields augmented by round table discussions and dialogue boards with specific topics. This year, this included practical advice as to possible approaches to moving PET/MRI into clinical routine, the use of PET/MRI in brain receptor imaging, in assessing cardiovascular diseases, cancer, infection, and inflammatory diseases. To address perceived challenges still remaining to innovatively integrate PET and MRI system technologies, a dedicated round table session brought together key representatives from industry and academia who were engaged with either the conceptualisation or early adoption of hybrid PET/MRI systems. Discussions during the workshop highlighted that emerging unique applications of PET/MRI such as the ability to provide multi-parametric quantitative and visual information which will enable not only overall disease detection but also disease characterisation would eventually be regarded as compelling arguments for the adoption of PET/MR. However, as indicated by previous workshops, evidence in favour of this observation is only growing slowly, mainly due to the ongoing inability to pool data cohorts from independent trials as well as different systems and sites. The participants emphasised that moving from status quo to status go entails the need to adopt standardised imaging procedures and the readiness to act together prospectively across multiple PET/MRI sites and vendors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B J Pichler
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - B Gückel
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A J Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - R Botnar
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - V Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Cancer Imaging, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Gotthardt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R J Hicks
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - R Lanzenberger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C la Fougere
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Lentschig
- ZEMODI, Zentrum für Moderne Diagnostik, Bremen, Germany
| | - S G Nekolla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - T Niederdraenk
- Strategy and Innovation Technology Center, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
| | - K Nikolaou
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J Nuyts
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Olego
- Philips, 3000 Minuteman Road, Andover, MA, 01810, USA
| | - K Åhlström Riklund
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Sciences, Umeå University/Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - A Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Departments of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - M Schäfers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster and European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - V Sossi
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - P Veit-Haibach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - L Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - M Wissmeyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Beyer
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, 4L, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bailey DL, Pichler BJ, Gückel B, Barthel H, Beer AJ, Bremerich J, Czernin J, Drzezga A, Franzius C, Goh V, Hartenbach M, Iida H, Kjaer A, la Fougère C, Ladefoged CN, Law I, Nikolaou K, Quick HH, Sabri O, Schäfer J, Schäfers M, Wehrl HF, Beyer T. Combined PET/MRI: Multi-modality Multi-parametric Imaging Is Here: Summary Report of the 4th International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 23-27, 2015, Tübingen, Germany. Mol Imaging Biol 2015; 17:595-608. [PMID: 26286794 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-015-0886-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This paper summarises key themes and discussions from the 4th international workshop dedicated to the advancement of the technical, scientific and clinical applications of combined positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems that was held in Tübingen, Germany, from February 23 to 27, 2015. Specifically, we summarise the three days of invited presentations from active researchers in this and associated fields augmented by round table discussions and dialogue boards with specific topics. These include the use of PET/MRI in cardiovascular disease, paediatrics, oncology, neurology and multi-parametric imaging, the latter of which was suggested as a key promoting factor for the wider adoption of integrated PET/MRI. Discussions throughout the workshop and a poll taken on the final day demonstrated that attendees felt more strongly that PET/MRI has further advanced in both technical versatility and acceptance by clinical and research-driven users from the status quo of last year. Still, with only minimal evidence of progress made in exploiting the true complementary nature of the PET and MRI-based information, PET/MRI is still yet to achieve its potential. In that regard, the conclusion of last year's meeting "the real work has just started" still holds true.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D L Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B J Pichler
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - B Gückel
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - A J Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - J Bremerich
- Cardiothoracic Section, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Czernin
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
| | - A Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Franzius
- Centre of Morphological and Molecular Diagnostics (ZeMoDi), MR- and PET/MRI; Centre of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Bremen, Germany
| | - V Goh
- Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Hartenbach
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Iida
- Department of Investigative Radiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - A Kjaer
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C N Ladefoged
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - I Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K Nikolaou
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H H Quick
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MR Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- High Field and Hybrid MR-Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - O Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - J Schäfer
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Schäfers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - H F Wehrl
- Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - T Beyer
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University Vienna, 4L, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kalemis A, Delattre BMA, Heinzer S. Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer’s perspective. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2012; 26:5-23. [DOI: 10.1007/s10334-012-0330-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2012] [Revised: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/11/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
9
|
Sullivan R, Peppercorn J, Sikora K, Zalcberg J, Meropol NJ, Amir E, Khayat D, Boyle P, Autier P, Tannock IF, Fojo T, Siderov J, Williamson S, Camporesi S, McVie JG, Purushotham AD, Naredi P, Eggermont A, Brennan MF, Steinberg ML, De Ridder M, McCloskey SA, Verellen D, Roberts T, Storme G, Hicks RJ, Ell PJ, Hirsch BR, Carbone DP, Schulman KA, Catchpole P, Taylor D, Geissler J, Brinker NG, Meltzer D, Kerr D, Aapro M. Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12:933-80. [PMID: 21958503 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70141-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 503] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The burden of cancer is growing, and the disease is becoming a major economic expenditure for all developed countries. In 2008, the worldwide cost of cancer due to premature death and disability (not including direct medical costs) was estimated to be US$895 billion. This is not simply due to an increase in absolute numbers, but also the rate of increase of expenditure on cancer. What are the drivers and solutions to the so-called cancer-cost curve in developed countries? How are we going to afford to deliver high quality and equitable care? Here, expert opinion from health-care professionals, policy makers, and cancer survivors has been gathered to address the barriers and solutions to delivering affordable cancer care. Although many of the drivers and themes are specific to a particular field-eg, the huge development costs for cancer medicines-there is strong concordance running through each contribution. Several drivers of cost, such as over-use, rapid expansion, and shortening life cycles of cancer technologies (such as medicines and imaging modalities), and the lack of suitable clinical research and integrated health economic studies, have converged with more defensive medical practice, a less informed regulatory system, a lack of evidence-based sociopolitical debate, and a declining degree of fairness for all patients with cancer. Urgent solutions range from re-engineering of the macroeconomic basis of cancer costs (eg, value-based approaches to bend the cost curve and allow cost-saving technologies), greater education of policy makers, and an informed and transparent regulatory system. A radical shift in cancer policy is also required. Political toleration of unfairness in access to affordable cancer treatment is unacceptable. The cancer profession and industry should take responsibility and not accept a substandard evidence base and an ethos of very small benefit at whatever cost; rather, we need delivery of fair prices and real value from new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Sullivan
- Kings Health Partners, King's College, Integrated Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital Campus, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schreiter NF, Nogami M, Steffen I, Pape UF, Hamm B, Brenner W, Röttgen R. Evaluation of the potential of PET-MRI fusion for detection of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol 2011; 22:458-67. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2266-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2011] [Revised: 08/10/2011] [Accepted: 08/31/2011] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
11
|
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Daftary
- Innovision Imaging Pvt. Ltd., 210, Doctor House, 14 Pedder Road, Mumbai - 400 026, India. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hricak H, Choi BI, Scott AM, Sugimura K, Muellner A, von Schulthess GK, Reiser MF, Graham MM, Dunnick NR, Larson SM. Global trends in hybrid imaging. Radiology 2010; 257:498-506. [PMID: 20829539 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10100579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
At the 2009 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, a special session was devoted to global trends in hybrid imaging. This article expands on the key points of the session, focusing primarily on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Global trends in hybrid imaging equipment acquisition, usage, and image interpretation practices are reviewed, and emerging requirements for training and clinical privileging are discussed. Also considered are the current benefits of hybrid imaging for patient care and workflow and the potential of hybrid imaging for advancing drug development and personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Room C-278, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang L. Morphological and functional MDCT: problem-solving tool and surrogate biomarker for hepatic disease clinical care and drug discovery in the era of personalized medicine. Hepat Med 2010; 2:111-24. [PMID: 24367211 PMCID: PMC3846718 DOI: 10.2147/hmer.s9052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This article explains the significant role of morphological and functional multidetector computer tomography (MDCT) in combination with imaging postprocessing algorithms served as a problem-solving tool and noninvasive surrogate biomarker to effectively improve hepatic diseases characterization, detection, tumor staging and prognosis, therapy response assessment, and novel drug discovery programs, partial liver resection and transplantation, and MDCT-guided interventions in the era of personalized medicine. State-of-the-art MDCT depicts and quantifies hepatic disease over conventional CT for not only depicting lesion location, size, and extent but also detecting changes in tumor biologic behavior caused by therapy or tumor progression before morphologic changes. Color-encoded parameter display provides important functional information on blood flow, permeability, leakage space, and blood volume. Together with other relevant biomarkers and genomics, the imaging modality is being developed and validated as a biomarker to early response to novel, targeted anti-VEGF(R)/PDGFR or antivascular/angiogenesis agents as its parameters correlate with immunohistochemical surrogates of tumor angiogenesis and molecular features of malignancies. MDCT holds incremental value to World Health Organization response criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in liver disease management. MDCT volumetric measurement of future remnant liver is the most important factor influencing the outcome of patients who underwent partial liver resection and transplantation. MDCT-guided interventional methods deliver personalized therapies locally in the human body. MDCT will hold more scientific impact when it is fused with other imaging probes to yield comprehensive information regarding changes in liver disease at different levels (anatomic, metabolic, molecular, histologic, and other levels).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel C, Goldstone A, Chowdhury F, Scarsbrook A. FDG PET/CT in oncology: “raising the bar”. Clin Radiol 2010; 65:522-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2009] [Revised: 12/23/2009] [Accepted: 01/05/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Abstract
Multimodality image registration and fusion have a key role in routine diagnosis, staging, restaging, and the assessment of response to treatment, surgery, and radiotherapy planning of malignant disease. The complementarity between anatomic (CT and MR imaging) and molecular (SPECT and PET) imaging modalities is well established and the role of fusion imaging widely recognized as a central piece of the general tree of clinical decision making. Moreover, dual modality imaging technologies including SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and, in the future, PET/MR imaging, now represent the leading component of contemporary health care institutions. This article discusses recent advances in clinical multimodality imaging, the role of correlative fusion imaging in a clinical setting, and future opportunities and challenges facing the adoption of multimodality imaging.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hall NC, Zhang J, Povoski SP, Martin EW, Knopp MV. New developments in imaging and functional biomarker technology for the assessment and management of cancer patients. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009; 6:347-51. [PMID: 19572788 DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
17
|
Zaidi H, Vees H, Wissmeyer M. Molecular PET/CT imaging-guided radiation therapy treatment planning. Acad Radiol 2009; 16:1108-33. [PMID: 19427800 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2008] [Revised: 02/11/2009] [Accepted: 02/19/2009] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The role of positron emission tomography (PET) during the past decade has evolved rapidly from that of a pure research tool to a methodology of enormous clinical potential. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET is currently the most widely used probe in the diagnosis, staging, assessment of tumor response to treatment, and radiation therapy planning because metabolic changes generally precede the more conventionally measured parameter of change in tumor size. Data accumulated rapidly during the last decade, thus validating the efficacy of FDG imaging and many other tracers in a wide variety of malignant tumors with sensitivities and specificities often in the high 90 percentile range. As a result, PET/computed tomography (CT) had a significant impact on the management of patients because it obviated the need for further evaluation, guided further diagnostic procedures, and assisted in planning therapy for a considerable number of patients. On the other hand, the progress in radiation therapy technology has been enormous during the last two decades, now offering the possibility to plan highly conformal radiation dose distributions through the use of sophisticated beam targeting techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and many other promising technologies for sculpted three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution. The foundation of molecular imaging-guided radiation therapy lies in the use of advanced imaging technology for improved definition of tumor target volumes, thus relating the absorbed dose information to image-based patient representations. This review documents technological advancements in the field concentrating on the conceptual role of molecular PET/CT imaging in radiation therapy treatment planning and related image processing issues with special emphasis on segmentation of medical images for the purpose of defining target volumes. There is still much more work to be done and many of the techniques reviewed are themselves not yet widely implemented in clinical settings.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Alavi A. The Clinical Role of Fusion Imaging Using PET, CT, and MR Imaging. PET Clin 2008; 3:275-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2009.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|