Biodistribution and radiation dose estimates for 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

Gallium-68 labeled somatostatin receptor antagonist PET/CT in over 500 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms: experience from a single center in China

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor antagonists have shown promising performance for imaging neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, there is a lack of studies exploring the diagnostic performance of SSTR antagonists or comparing them with agonists in a large cohort of patients with NENs. This study aimed to retrospectively review all SSTR antagonist PET/CT scans conducted at Peking Union Medical College Hospital since November 2018 in patients with confirmed or suspected NENs.

METHODS

Four types of SSTR antagonists were utilized, including [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-LM3, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-LM3, [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-JR11, and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-JR11. The reference standard was based on a combination of histopathology, clinical evaluation, imaging results, and follow-up. Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were evaluated. The SUVmax and tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) of the hottest lesions was recorded and compared between antagonists and [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE.

RESULTS

A total of 622 antagonist scans from 549 patients were included in the analysis. The patient-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of antagonist imaging (all tracers combined) were 91.0% (443/487), 91.9% (57/62), and 91.1% (500/549), respectively. In 181 patients with a comparative [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan, the patient-level sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87.5% (147/168), 76.9% (10/13), and 86.7% (157/181), respectively. For the hottest lesions, SSTR antagonists all tracers combined demonstrated an overall comparable SUVmax to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE (40.1 ± 32.5 vs. 39.4 ± 23.8, p = 0.772). While [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-LM3 showed significantly higher uptake than [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE (57.4 ± 38.5 vs. 40.0 ± 22.8, p<0.001), [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-JR11 (39.7 ± 26.5 vs. 34.3 ± 23.9, p = 0.108) and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-LM3 (38.9 ± 32.1 vs. 37.2 ± 22.1, p = 0.858) showed comparable uptake to [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-JR11 showed lower uptake (28.9 ± 26.1 vs. 44.0 ± 25.7, p = 0.001). All antagonists exhibited significantly higher TLR than [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE (12.1 ± 10.8 vs. 5.2 ± 4.5, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Gallium-68 labeled SSTR antagonists could serve as alternatives to SSTR agonists for imaging of NENs. Among various antagonists, [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-LM3 seems to have the best imaging profile.

State-of-the-Art Hybrid Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) may be challenging to diagnose due to their small size and diverse anatomical locations. Hybrid imaging techniques, specifically positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), represent the current state-of-the-art for evaluating NENs. The preferred radiopharmaceuticals for NEN PET imaging are gallium-68 (68Ga) DOTA-peptides, which target somatostatin receptors (SSTR) overexpressed on NEN cells. Clinical applications of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptides PET/CT include diagnosis, staging, prognosis assessment, treatment selection, and response evaluation. Fluorodeoxyglucose-18 (18F-FDG) PET/CT aids in detecting low-SSTR-expressing lesions and helps in patient stratification and treatment planning, particularly in grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). New radiopharmaceuticals such as fluorine-labeled SSTR agonists and SSTR antagonists are emerging as alternatives to 68Ga-labeled peptides, offering improved detection rates and favorable biodistribution. The maturing of PET/MRI brings advantages to NEN imaging, including simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI images, superior soft tissue contrast resolution, and motion correction capabilities. The PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptides has demonstrated higher lesion detection rates and more accurate lesion classification compared to PET/CT. Overall, hybrid imaging offers valuable insights in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning of NENs. Further research is needed to refine response assessment criteria and standardize reporting guidelines.

Theranostics - a sure cure for cancer after 100 years?

Cancer has remained a formidable challenge in medicine and has claimed an enormous number of lives worldwide. Theranostics, combining diagnostic methods with personalized therapeutic approaches, shows huge potential to advance the battle against cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of theranostics in oncology: exploring its history, current advances, challenges, and prospects. We present the fundamental evolution of theranostics from radiotherapeutics, cellular therapeutics, and nanotherapeutics, showcasing critical milestones in the last decade. From the early concept of targeted drug delivery to the emergence of personalized medicine, theranostics has benefited from advances in imaging technologies, molecular biology, and nanomedicine. Furthermore, we emphasize pertinent illustrations showcasing that revolutionary strategies in cancer management enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide targeted therapies customized for individual patients, thereby facilitating the implementation of personalized medicine. Finally, we describe future perspectives on current challenges, emerging topics, and advances in the field.

Inspired by novel radiopharmaceuticals: Rush hour of nuclear medicine

Nuclear medicine plays an irreplaceable role in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. Radiopharmaceuticals are important components of nuclear medicine. Among the radiopharmaceuticals approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), radio-tracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and somatostatin receptor (SSTR) have held essential positions in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancers and neuroendocrine neoplasms, respectively. In recent years, FDA-approved serials of immune-therapy and targeted therapy drugs targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and nectin cell adhesion molecule 4 (Nectin 4). How to screen patients suitable for these treatments and monitor the therapy? Nuclear medicine with specific radiopharmaceuticals can visualize the expression level of those targets in systemic lesions and evaluate the efficacy of treatment. In addition to radiopharmaceuticals, imaging equipment is also a key step for nuclear medicine. Advanced equipment including total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) has been developed, which contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of tumors, as well as the development of new radiopharmaceuticals. Here, we conclude most recently advances of radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine, and they substantially increase the "arsenal" of clinicians for tumor therapy.

Next-generation PET/CT imaging in meningioma-first clinical experiences using the novel SSTR-targeting peptide [18F]SiTATE

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT provides important clinical information in addition to standard imaging in meningioma patients. [18F]SiTATE is a novel, 18F-labeled SSTR-targeting peptide with superior imaging properties according to preliminary data. We provide the first [18F]SiTATE PET/CT data of a large cohort of meningioma patients.

METHODS

Patients with known or suspected meningioma undergoing [18F]SiTATE PET/CT were included. Uptake intensity (SUV) of meningiomas, non-meningioma lesions, and healthy organs were assessed using a 50% isocontour volume of interest (VOI) or a spherical VOI, respectively. Also, trans-osseous extension on PET/CT was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with 117 [18F]SiTATE PET/CT scans were included. Overall, 231 meningioma lesions and 61 non-meningioma lesions (e.g., post-therapeutic changes) were analyzed. Physiological uptake was lowest in healthy brain tissue, followed by bone marrow, parotid, and pituitary (SUVmean 0.06 ± 0.04 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 1.0 vs. 9.8 ± 4.6; p < 0.001). Meningiomas showed significantly higher uptake than non-meningioma lesions (SUVmax 11.6 ± 10.6 vs. 4.0 ± 3.3, p < 0.001). Meningiomas showed significantly higher uptake than non-meningioma lesions (SUVmax 11.6±10.6 vs. 4.0±3.3, p<0.001). 93/231 (40.3%) meningiomas showed partial trans-osseous extension and 34/231 (14.7%) predominant intra-osseous extension. 59/231 (25.6%) meningioma lesions found on PET/CT had not been reported on previous standard imaging.

CONCLUSION

This is the first PET/CT study using an 18F-labeled SSTR-ligand in meningioma patients: [18F]SiTATE provides extraordinary contrast in meningioma compared to healthy tissue and non-meningioma lesions, which leads to a high detection rate of so far unknown meningioma sites and osseous involvement. Having in mind the advantageous logistic features of 18F-labeled compared to 68Ga-labeled compounds (e.g., longer half-life and large-badge production), [18F]SiTATE has the potential to foster a widespread use of SSTR-targeted imaging in neuro-oncology.

Molecular imaging Theranostics of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, originating mostly from the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract followed by the lungs. Multidisciplinary discussion is mandatory for optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. Well-differentiated NEN (NET) present a high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) and can be studied with [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides ([68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE) PET/CT to assess disease extension and the eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). SSTR-analogues labelled with 90Y or 177Lu have been used since mid-90s for NET therapy. PRRT is now considered an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NET: following the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE by FDA and EMA, PRRT is now part of the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. New strategies to improve PRRT efficacy and to reduce its toxicity are under evaluation (eg, personalization of treatment schemes, the selection of the most suitable patients, improvement of response assessment criteria, optimization of treatment sequencing, feasibility of PRRT-retreatment, combination of PRRT with other treatments options). Recently, several emerging radiopharmaceuticals showed encouraging results for both imaging and therapy (eg, SSTR-analogues labelled with 18F, SSTR-antagonists for both diagnosis and therapy, alpha-labelling for therapy, radiopharmaceuticals binding to new cellular targets). Aim of this review is to focus on current knowledge and to outline emerging perspectives for NEN's diagnosis and therapy.

Nuclear Medicine and Radiological Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Multidisciplinary Update

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are part of a large family of tumors arising from the neuroendocrine system. PanNENs show low-intermediate tumor grade and generally high somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. Therefore, panNENs benefit from functional imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin analogues (SSA) for diagnosis, staging, and treatment choice in parallel with morphological imaging. This narrative review aims to present conventional imaging techniques and new perspectives in the management of panNENs, providing the clinicians with useful insight for clinical practice. The ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET/CT is the most widely used in panNENs, not only fr diagnosis and staging purpose but also to characterize the biology of the tumor and its responsiveness to SSAs. On the contrary, the ¹⁸F-Fluordeoxiglucose (FDG) PET/CT is not employed systematically in all panNEN patients, being generally preferred in G2-G3, to predict aggressiveness and progression rate. The combination of ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can finally suggest the best therapeutic strategy. Other radiopharmaceuticals are ⁶⁸Ga-exendin-4 in case of insulinomas and ¹⁸F-dopamine (DOPA), which can be helpful in SSTR-negative tumors. New promising but still-under-investigation radiopharmaceuticals include radiolabeled SSTR antagonists and ¹⁸F-SSAs. Conventional imaging includes contrast enhanced CT and multiparametric MRI. There are now enriched by radiomics, a new non-invasive imaging approach, very promising to early predict tumor response or progression.

Emerging Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation

Atherosclerosis is a chronic widespread cardiovascular disease and a major predisposing factor for cardiovascular events, among which there are myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Atherosclerotic plaque formation is a process that involves different mechanisms, of which inflammation is the most common. Plenty of radiopharmaceuticals were developed to elucidate the process of plaque formation at different stages, some of which were highly specific for atherosclerotic plaque. This review summarizes the current nuclear medicine imaging landscape of preclinical and small-scale clinical studies of these specific RPs, which are not as widespread as labeled FDG, sodium fluoride, and choline. These include oxidation-specific epitope imaging, macrophage, and other cell receptors visualization, neoangiogenesis, and macrophage death imaging. It is shown that specific radiopharmaceuticals have strength in pathophysiologically sound imaging of the atherosclerotic plaques at different stages, but this also may induce problems with the signal registration for low-volume plaques in the vascular wall.

Diagnostic Value of Radiolabelled Somatostatin Analogues for Neuroendocrine Tumour Diagnosis: The Benefits and Drawbacks of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC

Simple Summary

One of the most incredible advances in nuclear medicine is early detection of neuroendocrine tumors, which leads to appropriate and expedient treatment pathways. Advances made with somatostatin analogue derivatives radiolabeled with Gallium-68 clarified the paths of diagnosis and treatment properly. Despite the significant improvements, widespread efforts are in progress to attain the most specific radiopharmaceutical for this purpose. In this literature review, we will provide a short overview on the role of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors focusing on [⁶⁴Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC as a new radiopharmaceutical with promising clinical results.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arise from secondary epithelial cell lines in the gastrointestinal or respiratory system organs. The rate of development of these tumours varies from an indolent to an aggressive course, typically being initially asymptomatic. The identification of these tumours is difficult, particularly because the primary tumour is often small and undetectable by conventional anatomical imaging. Consequently, diagnosis of NETs is complicated and has been a significant challenge until recently. In the last 30 years, the advent of novel nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures has led to a substantial increase in NET detection. Great varieties of exclusive single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals for detecting NETs are being applied successfully in clinical settings, including [¹¹¹In]In-pentetreotide, [^99mTc]Tc-HYNIC-TOC/TATE, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, and [⁶⁴Cu]Cu-DOTA-TOC/TATE. Among these tracers for functional imaging, PET radiopharmaceuticals are clearly and substantially superior to planar or SPECT imaging radiopharmaceuticals. The main advantages include higher resolution, better sensitivity and increased lesion-to-background uptake. An advantage of diagnosis with a radiopharmaceutical is the capacity of theranostics to provide concomitant diagnosis and treatment with particulate radionuclides, such as beta and alpha emitters including Lutetium-177 (¹⁷⁷Lu) and Actinium-225 (²²⁵Ac). Due to these unique challenges involved with diagnosing NETs, various PET tracers have been developed. This review compares the clinical characteristics of radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for NET diagnosis, focusing on the most recently FDA-approved [⁶⁴Cu]Cu-DOTA-TATE as a state-of-the art NET-PET/CT radiopharmaceutical.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs-A Continuously Evolving Class of Radiopharmaceuticals

Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are recognized as favorable molecular targets in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), with subtype 2 (SST₂) being the predominantly and most frequently expressed. PET/CT imaging with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled SST agonists, e.g., ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TOC (SomaKit TOC^®) or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT^®), plays an important role in staging and restaging these tumors and can identify patients who qualify and would potentially benefit from peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with the therapeutic counterparts ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TOC or ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-TATE (Lutathera^®). This is an important feature of SST targeting, as it allows a personalized treatment approach (theranostic approach). Today, new developments hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy. Among them, the use of SST₂ antagonists, such as JR11 and LM3, has shown certain advantages in improving image sensitivity and tumor radiation dose, and there is evidence that they may find application in other oncological indications beyond NETs and NENs. In addition, PRRT performed with more cytotoxic α-emitters, such as ²²⁵Ac, or β^- and Auger electrons, such as ¹⁶¹Tb, presents higher efficacy. It remains to be seen if any of these new developments will overpower the established radiolabeled SST analogs and PRRT with β^--emitters.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues for Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, presenting in often challenging clinical scenarios, and require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with ⁶⁸Ga for imaging well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors NETs, and labelled with ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁷⁷Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility of based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. The present paper is an overview of currently employed radiolabeled SSTR analogues used for both diagnosis and therapy of NENs. Further emerging radiopharmaceuticals targeting SSTRs (e.g., fluorinated SSTR agonists, radiolabeled SSTR antagonists) as well as strategies to improve PRRT efficacy (by means of implementation of personalized treatment schemes, dosimetry, amelioration of response assessment strategies, and optimization of treatment sequencing) are also discussed. Finally, although very preliminary, some studies employing radiomic features in various kinds of NET are reported.

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with ⁶⁸Ga for diagnosis and with ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁷⁷Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with ¹⁸F (to overcome the limits imposed by ⁶⁸Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

Imaging inflammation in atherosclerotic plaques, targeting SST2 with [111In]In-DOTA-JR11

BACKGROUND

Imaging Somatostatin Subtype Receptor 2 (SST2) expressing macrophages by [DOTA,Tyr3]-octreotate (DOTATATE) has proven successful for plaque detection. DOTA-JR11 is a SST2 targeting ligand with a five times higher tumor uptake than DOTATATE, and holds promise to improve plaque imaging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of DOTA-JR11 for plaque detection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Atherosclerotic ApoE-/- mice (n = 22) fed an atherogenic diet were imaged by SPECT/CT two hours post injection of [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 (~ 200 pmol, ~ 50 MBq). In vivo plaque uptake of [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 was visible in all mice, with a target-to-background-ratio (TBR) of 2.23 ± 0.35. Post-mortem scans after thymectomy and ex vivo scans of the arteries after excision of the arteries confirmed plaque uptake of the radioligand with TBRs of 2.46 ± 0.52 and 3.43 ± 1.45 respectively. Oil red O lipid-staining and ex vivo autoradiography of excised arteries showed [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 uptake at plaque locations. Histological processing showed CD68 (macrophages) and SST2 expressing cells in plaques. SPECT/CT, in vitro autoradiography and immunohistochemistry performed on slices of a human carotid endarterectomy sample showed [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 uptake at plaque locations containing CD68 and SST2 expressing cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate DOTA-JR11 as a promising ligand for visualization of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation.

Dosimetry and optimal scan time of [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues targeting somatostatin receptors (SSR) are well established for combined positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) imaging of neuroendocrine tumours (NET). [18F]SiTATE has recently been introduced showing high image quality, promising clinical performance and improved logistics compared to the clinical reference standard 68Ga-DOTA-TOC. Here we present the first dosimetry and optimal scan time analysis.

METHODS

Eight NET patients received a [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT (250 ± 66 MBq) with repeated emission scans (10, 30, 60, 120, 180 min after injection). Biodistribution in normal organs and SSR-positive tumour uptake were assessed. Dosimetry estimates for risk organs were determined using a combined linear-monoexponential model, and by applying 18F S-values and reference target masses for the ICRP89 adult male or female (OLINDA 2.0). Tumour-to-background ratios were compared quantitatively and visually between different scan times.

RESULTS

After 1 h, normal organs showed similar tracer uptake with only negligible changes until 3 h post-injection. In contrast, tracer uptake by tumours increased progressively for almost all types of metastases, thus increasing tumour-to-background ratios over time. Dosimetry resulted in a total effective dose of 0.015 ± 0.004 mSv/MBq. Visual evaluation revealed no clinically relevant discrepancies between later scan times, but image quality was rated highest in 60 and 120 min images.

CONCLUSION

[18F]SiTATE-PET/CT in NET shows overall high tumour-to-background ratios from 60 to 180 min after injection and an effective dose comparable to 68Ga-labelled alternatives. For clinical use of [18F]SiTATE, the best compromise between image quality and tumour-to-background contrast is reached at 120 min, followed by 60 min after injection.

Somatostatin Receptor Imaging and Theranostics: Current Practice and Future Prospects

A new era of precision diagnostics and therapy for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms began with the approval of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging followed by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). With the transition from SSTR-based γ-scintigraphy to PET, the higher sensitivity of the latter raised questions regarding the direct application of the planar scintigraphy-based Krenning score for PRRT eligibility. Also, to date, the role of SSTR PET in response assessment and predicting outcome remains under evaluation. In this comprehensive review article, we discuss the current role of SSTR PET in all aspects of neuroendocrine neoplasms, including its relation to conventional imaging, selection of patients for PRRT, and the current understanding of SSTR PET-based response assessment. We also provide a standardized reporting template for SSTR PET with a brief discussion.

Treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia, are we on the way to personalised medicine?

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEPNEN) comprises clinically as well as prognostically diverse tumour entities often diagnosed at late stage. Current classification provides a uniform terminology and a Ki67-based grading system, thereby facilitating management. Advances in the study of genomic and epigenetic landscapes have amplified knowledge of tumour biology and enhanced identification of prognostic and potentially predictive treatment subgroups. Translation of this genomic and mechanistic biology into advanced GEPNEN management is limited. 'Targeted' treatments such as somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radiotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are treatment options but predictive tools are lacking. The inability to identify clonal heterogeneity and define critical oncoregulatory pathways prior to therapy, restrict therapeutic efficacy as does the inability to monitor disease status in real time. Chemotherapy in the poor prognosis NEN G3 group, though associated with acceptable response rates, only leads to short-term tumour control and their molecular biology requires delineation to provide new and more specific treatment options.The future requires an exploration of the NEN tumour genome, its microenvironment and an identification of critical oncologic checkpoints for precise drug targeting. In the advance to personalised medical treatment of patients with GEPNEN, clinical trials need to be based on mechanistic and multidimensional characterisation of each tumour in order to identify the therapeutic agent effective for the individual tumour.This review surveys advances in NEN research and delineates the current status of translation with a view to laying the basis for a genome-based personalised medicine management of advanced GEPNEN.

Autoradiographical assessment of inflammation-targeting radioligands for atherosclerosis imaging: potential for plaque phenotype identification

PURPOSE

Many radioligands have been developed for the visualization of atherosclerosis by targeting inflammation. However, interpretation of in vivo signals is often limited to plaque identification. We evaluated binding of some promising radioligands in an in vitro approach in atherosclerotic plaques with different phenotypes.

METHODS

Tissue sections of carotid endarterectomy tissue were characterized as early plaque, fibro-calcific plaque, or phenotypically vulnerable plaque. In vitro binding assays for the radioligands [111In]In-DOTATATE; [111In]In-DOTA-JR11; [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor; [111In]In-DANBIRT; and [111In]In-EC0800 were conducted, the expression of the radioligand targets was assessed via immunohistochemistry. Radioligand binding and expression of radioligand targets was investigated and compared.

RESULTS

In sections characterized as vulnerable plaque, binding was highest for [111In]In-EC0800; followed by [111In]In-DANBIRT; [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor; [111In]In-DOTA-JR11; and [111In]In-DOTATATE (0.064 ± 0.036; 0.052 ± 0.029; 0.011 ± 0.003; 0.0066 ± 0.0021; 0.00064 ± 0.00014 %Added activity/mm2, respectively). Binding of [111In]In-DANBIRT and [111In]In-EC0800 was highest across plaque phenotypes, binding of [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 and [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor differed most between plaque phenotypes. Binding of [111In]In-DOTATATE was the lowest across plaque phenotypes. The areas positive for cells expressing the radioligand's target differed between plaque phenotypes for all targets, with lowest percentage area of expression in early plaque sections and highest in phenotypically vulnerable plaque sections.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioligands targeting inflammatory cell markers showed different levels of binding in atherosclerotic plaques and among plaque phenotypes. Different radioligands might be used for plaque detection and discerning early from vulnerable plaque. [111In]In-EC0800 and [111In]In-DANBIRT appear most suitable for plaque detection, while [67Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [111In]In-DOTA-JR11 might be best suited for differentiation between plaque phenotypes.

Somatostatin Receptor Imaging PET in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm

PET/computed tomography (CT) imaging increasingly is used in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) for diagnosis, staging, monitoring, prognostication, and choosing treatment. Somatostatin PET analog tracers have added to the specificity by obtaining higher affinity to somatostatin receptors with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled or ⁶⁴Cu-labeled DOTA peptides compared with single-photon emission CT imaging isotopes. PET uptake correlates to tumor grade and is an essential part of theranostics with peptide receptor radionuclide treatment. This article focuses on the literature on head-to-head studies and meta-analyses of different combinations of peptide agonists and a few antagonists. Overall, the published data support the diagnostic capability of PET/CT imaging in NENs.

Synthesis, preclinical evaluation, and a pilot clinical imaging study of [18F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 for neuroendocrine neoplasms compared with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE

PURPOSE

A [¹⁸F]AlF-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist was developed for imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), evaluated and compared with [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.

METHOD

[¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 was synthesized manually and qualified with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The cellular uptake, internalization, and saturation binding were performed with HEK293-SSTR2 cells. Biodistribution and micro-PET imaging were carried out with HEK293-SSTR2 tumor-bearing mice. [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 PET/MR imaging and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT were performed with ten patients of NEN at 50~60 min post-injection (p.i.). Normal organ biodistribution and tumor detectability were evaluated.

RESULT

[¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11(24~36 GBq/μmol) was prepared within 30 min and 51.35 ± 3.30% (n > 10)of radiochemical yield. The radiochemical purity was 98.74 ± 1.24% (n > 10). Two stereoisomers were found and confirmed by LC-MS. The cellular uptake of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE were 4.50 ± 0.31 and 4.50 ± 0.13 %AD/10⁵ cells at 30 min, and the internalization at 37 °C of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 (5.47 ± 0.32% at 60 min) was significantly lower than [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (66.89 ± 1.62% at 60 min). The affinity of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 (K_d = 11.59 ± 1.31 nM) was slightly lower than [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (K_d = 7.36 ± 1.02 nM); [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 showed high uptake in tumor (9.02 ± 0.92 %ID/g at 60 min p.i.) which can be blocked by 50 μg of NOTA-JR11 (3.40 ± 1.64 %ID/g at 60 min p.i.); the result was coincident with micro-PET imaging. Imaging study of NEN patients showed that more lesions were found only by [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 (n = 67 vs. 1 only by [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE), and the uptakes of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 in majority normal organs were significantly lower than [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. The target to nontarget of maximum of standard uptake value (SUVmax) of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 in liver lesions were significantly higher than those of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE.

CONCLUSION

Qualitied [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 is prepared conveniently with reasonable yield, and it can bind SSTR2 specifically with high affinity. Excellent imaging capability of [¹⁸F]AlF-NOTA-JR11 for NENs is superior to [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE, especially in digestive system. It has a great potential for imaging of NENs.

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety, Biodistribution, and Dosimetry of 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 68Ga-DOTA-LM3 in Patients with Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors

⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 (where LM3 is p-Cl-Phe-cyclo(d-Cys-Tyr-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)d-Tyr-NH₂) and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3 are somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2)-specific antagonists used for PET/CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3 in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: Patients were equally randomized into 2 arms, with arm A receiving ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and arm B receiving ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3. Serial PET scans were acquired at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 (200 MBq ± 11 MBq/40 μg of total peptide mass) or ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3 (172 MBq ± 21 MBq/40 μg of total peptide mass) injection. The biodistribution in normal organs, tumor uptake, and safety were assessed. Radiation dosimetry was calculated using OLINDA/EXM (version 1.0). Results: Sixteen patients, 8 in each arm, were recruited in the study. Both tracers were well tolerated in most patients. Two patients in arm B had nausea (grade 2), and one of them had vomiting (grade 1). The PET images of the other 14 patients were further analyzed. Significantly lower organ uptake was observed in the pituitary, parotids, liver, spleen, pancreas, adrenal, stomach, small intestine, and kidneys with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3 than with ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3. In total, 38 lesions were analyzed, including 18 with ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 20 with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3. Both tracers showed good tumor uptake and retention. With ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3, the tracer accumulation in tumor lesions increased by 138%, from an average SUV_max of 31.3 ± 19.7 at 5 min to 74.6 ± 56.3 at 2 h. With ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3, the tumor uptake rapidly reached a high level at 5 min after injection, with an average SUV_max of 36.6 ± 23.6, and continued to increase to 45.3 ± 29.3 until 30 min after injection. The urinary bladder wall was the organ receiving the highest absorbed dose in both arms. The mean effective dose was 0.026 ± 0.003 mSv/MBq for ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and 0.025 ± 0.002 mSv/MBq for ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3. Conclusion: Both ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3 show favorable biodistribution, high tumor uptake, and good tumor retention, resulting in high image contrast. The dosimetric data are comparable to those for other ⁶⁸Ga-labeled SSTR2 antagonists. Further studies are required to look into the potential antagonistic effects of ⁶⁸Ga-NODAGA-LM3 and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-LM3.

Radiopharmaceuticals for Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that originate in endocrine tissues throughout the body. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease refractory to standard of care treatment. The landmark international phase III NETTER-1 trial led to the approval of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera) in the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic NETs. Similarly, data from the multicenter, phase II Study IB12B led to the approval of meta-[¹³¹I]Iodo-Benzyl-Guanidine (^I31I-MIBG) for treatment of iobenguane scan-positive, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. With the clinical approval of these novel radiopharmaceuticals for managing select patients with NETs, additional studies are needed to refine patient selection, predict and assess therapy response, and optimize radiopharmaceutical delivery and clinical outcomes.

The emerging role of cell surface receptor and protein binding radiopharmaceuticals in cancer diagnostics and therapy

Targeting specific cell membrane markers for both diagnostic imaging and radionuclide therapy is a rapidly evolving field in cancer research. Some of these applications have now found a role in routine clinical practice and have been shown to have a significant impact on patient management. Several molecular targets are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials and show promise for future implementation. Advancements in molecular biology have facilitated the identification of new cancer-specific targets for radiopharmaceutical development.

Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show peculiar clinical and histomorphological features, with variable prognosis. In recent years, advances in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology and heterogeneous clinical presentation, as well as the availability of different diagnostic procedures for panNEN diagnosis and novel therapeutic options for patient clinical management, has led to the recognition of the need for an active multidisciplinary discussion for optimal patient care. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become indispensable for the management of panNENs. Several PET radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize either panNEN receptor expression or metabolism. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of all the currently used radiopharmaceuticals and of the new upcoming tracers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), and their clinical impact on therapy management. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT (SSA-PET/CT) has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and is recommended for the staging and restaging of any non-insulinoma well-differentiated panNEN cases to carry out detection of unknown primary tumor sites or early relapse and for evaluation of in vivo somatostatin receptors expression (SRE) to select patient candidates for peptide receptor radiometabolic treatment (PRRT) with ⁹⁰Y or ¹⁷⁷Lu and/or cold analogs. SSA-PET/CT also has a strong impact on clinical management, leading to a change in treatment in approximately a third of the cases. Its role for treatment response assessment is still under debate due to the lack of standardized criteria, even though some semiquantitative parameters seem to be able to predict response. [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT generally shows low sensitivity in small growing and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET; G1 and G2), while it is of utmost importance in the evaluation and management of high-grade NENs and also provides important prognostic information. When positive, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT impacts therapeutical management, indicating the need for a more aggressive treatment regime. Although FDG positivity does not exclude the patient from PRRT, several studies have demonstrated that it is certainly useful to predict response, even in this setting. The role of [¹⁸F]FDOPA for the study of panNET is limited by physiological uptake in the pancreas and is therefore not recommended. Moreover, it provides no information on SRE that has crucial clinical management relevance. Early acquisition of the abdomen and premedication with carbidopa may be useful to increase the accuracy, but further studies are needed to clarify its utility. GLP-1R agonists, such as exendin-4, are particularly useful for benign insulinoma detection, but their accuracy decreases in the case of malignant insulinomas. Being a whole-body imaging technique, exendin-PET/CT gives important preoperative information on tumor size and localization, which is fundamental for surgical planning as resection (enucleation of the lesion or partial pancreatic resection) is the only curative treatment. New upcoming tracers are under study, such as promising SSTR antagonists, which show a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor-to-background ratio that increases tumor detection, especially in the liver. [⁶⁸Ga]pentixafor, an in vivo marker of CXCR4 expression associated with the behavior of more aggressive tumors, seems to only play a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET since there is an inverse expression of SSTR2 and CXCR4 in G1 to G3 NETs with an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2 expression with increasing grade. Other tracers, such as [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA, [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC, [¹⁸F]SiTATE, and [¹⁸F]AlF-OC, are also under investigation.

The toxicology of gallium oxide in comparison with gallium arsenide and indium oxide

Gallium arsenide (GaAs) and indium oxide (In₂O₃) are used in electronic industries at high and increasing tonnages since decades. Gallium oxide (Ga₂O₃) is an emerging wide-bandgap transparent conductive oxide with as yet little industrial use. Since GaAs has received critical attention due to the arsenic ion, it seemed reasonable to compare its toxicology with the respective endpoints of Ga₂O₃ and In₂O₃ toxicology in order to find out if and to what extent arsenic contributes. In addition, the toxicology of Ga₂O₃ has not yet been adequately reviewed, Therefore, this review provides the first evaluation of all available toxicity data on Ga₂O₃. The acute toxicity of all three compounds is rather low. Subchronic inhalation studies in rats and mice revealed persistent pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) and/or alveolar histiocytic infiltrates down to the lowest tested concentration in rats and mice, i.e. 0.16 mg Ga₂O₃/m³. These are also the predominant effects after GaAs and In₂O₃ exposure at similarly low levels, i.e. 0.1 mg/m³ each. Subchronic Ga₂O₃ exposure caused a minimal microcytic anemia with erythrocytosis in rats (at 6.4 mg/m³ and greater) and mice (at 32 and 64 mg/m³), a decrease in epididymal sperm motility and concentration as well as testicular degeneration at 64 mg/m³. At comparable concentrations the hematological effects and male fertility of GaAs were much stronger. The stronger effects of GaAs are due to its better solubility and presumed higher bioavailability. The database for In₂O₃ is too small and subchronic testing was at very low levels to allow conclusive judgements if blood/blood forming or degrading and male fertility organs/tissues would also be targets.

Overview of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs for Cancer Imaging and Therapy

Identified in 1973, somatostatin (SST) is a cyclic hormone peptide with a short biological half-life. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are widely expressed in the whole body, with five subtypes described. The interaction between SST and its receptors leads to the internalization of the ligand-receptor complex and triggers different cellular signaling pathways. Interestingly, the expression of SSTRs is significantly enhanced in many solid tumors, especially gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET). Thus, somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have been developed to improve the stability of the endogenous ligand and so extend its half-life. Radiolabeled analogs have been developed with several radioelements such as indium-111, technetium-99 m, and recently gallium-68, fluorine-18, and copper-64, to visualize the distribution of receptor overexpression in tumors. Internal metabolic radiotherapy is also used as a therapeutic strategy (e.g., using yttrium-90, lutetium-177, and actinium-225). With some radiopharmaceuticals now used in clinical practice, somatostatin analogs developed for imaging and therapy are an example of the concept of personalized medicine with a theranostic approach. Here, we review the development of these analogs, from the well-established and authorized ones to the most recently developed radiotracers, which have better pharmacokinetic properties and demonstrate increased efficacy and safety, as well as the search for new clinical indications.

Review: PET imaging with macro- and middle-sized molecular probes

Recent progress in radiolabeling of macro- and middle-sized molecular probes has been extending possibilities to use PET molecular imaging for dynamic application to drug development and therapeutic evaluation. Theranostics concept also accelerated the use of macro- and middle-sized molecular probes for sharpening the contrast of proper target recognition even the cellular types/subtypes and proper selection of the patients who should be treated by the same molecules recognition. Here, brief summary of the present status of immuno-PET, and then further development of advanced technologies related to immuno-PET, peptidic PET probes, and nucleic acids PET probes are described.

Successful Intra-arterial Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of DOTATOC-Negative High-Grade Liver Metastases of a Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Using 177Lu-DOTA-LM3: A Somatostatin Receptor Antagonist

Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonists have shown promise for imaging neuroendocrine neoplasms and the superiority to SSTR agonists, with lower liver background especially for the sensitive detection of liver metastases, higher tumor-to-background ratio, and favorable pharmacokinetics. The clinical data of radiolabeled SSTR antagonists for therapy are still limited. We report our experience treating a young patient with DOTATOC-negative high-grade liver metastases of a pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm who underwent intra-arterial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using SSTR antagonist Lu-DOTA-LM3, demonstrating an excellent response, nearly complete remission according to molecular imaging criteria and morphological partial remission, without any significant toxicity.

Insight into the Development of PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Oncology

While the development of positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals closely follows that of traditional drug development, there are several key considerations in the chemical and radiochemical synthesis, preclinical assessment, and clinical translation of PET radiotracers. As such, we outline the fundamentals of radiotracer design, with respect to the selection of an appropriate pharmacophore. These concepts will be reinforced by exemplary cases of PET radiotracer development, both with respect to their preclinical and clinical evaluation. We also provide a guideline for the proper selection of a radionuclide and the appropriate labeling strategy to access a tracer with optimal imaging qualities. Finally, we summarize the methodology of their evaluation in in vitro and animal models and the road to clinical translation. This review is intended to be a primer for newcomers to the field and give insight into the workflow of developing radiopharmaceuticals.

Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT with dosimetric 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (177Lu-DOTA-JR11) SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

PURPOSE

Paired imaging/therapy with radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonists is a novel approach in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The aim of this study was to compare tumor uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 and ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-JR11) in patients with NETs.

METHODS

As part of a prospective clinical trial, 20 patients with metastatic NETs underwent ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT and serial imaging with ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. PET/CT and SPECT/CT parameters for lesion uptake and absorbed dose of ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in lesions were compared using linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

A total of 95 lesions were analyzed on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT and ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan SPECT/CT. SUVs and tumor-to-normal-tissue ratios on PET/CT and SPECT/CT were significantly correlated (p < 0.01), but the degree of correlation was modest with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.3 to 0.7. Variation in intrapatient lesional correlation was observed. Nevertheless, in all patients, the lesion SUVpeak uptake ratio for ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan vs. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 was high; even in those with low uptake on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET/CT (SUVpeak ≤ 10), a ratio of 8.0 ± 5.2 was noted. Correlation of SUVpeak of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 with projected ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetratexan-absorbed dose (n = 42) was modest (r = 0.5, p < 0.01), while excellent correlation of SUVpeak of ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan with projected ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan-absorbed dose was noted (r = 0.9, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 PET can be used for patient selection and PRRT and that low tumor uptake on PET should not preclude patients from treatment with ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. The ability to use single time-point SPECT/CT for absorbed dose calculations could facilitate dosimetry regimens, save costs, and improve patient convenience.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-DOTA-JR11 and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic, Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study

⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 is a somatostatin receptor subtype 2-specific antagonist used for PET/CT imaging. The purpose of this study was to compare ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in patients with metastatic, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Methods: Patients with histologically proven, metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors were prospectively recruited to this study. Each patient received an intravenous injection of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE (155 ± 52 MBq) on the first day and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 (148 ± 52 MBq) on the second day. Whole-body PET/CT scans were performed at 40-60 min after injection on the same scanner. Physiologic normal-organ uptake, lesion numbers, and lesion uptake were compared. Results: Thirty-one patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. The SUV_max of the spleen, renal cortex, adrenal glands, pituitary glands, stomach wall, normal liver parenchyma, small intestine, pancreas, and bone marrow was significantly lower on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 than on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (P < 0.001). ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 detected significantly more liver lesions (552 vs. 365, P = 0.001) but fewer bone lesions (158 vs. 388, P = 0.016) than ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE. The target-to-background ratio of liver lesions was significantly higher on ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 (7.7 ± 5.4 vs. 3.4 ± 2.0, P < 0.001). ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed comparable results for primary tumors and lymph node metastases on both patient-based and lesion-based comparisons. Conclusion: ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 performs better in detecting liver metastases, with a better tumor-to-background ratio, whereas ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE may outperform ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 in the detection of bone metastases. However, the lower somatostatin receptor subtype 2 affinity of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-JR11 than of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-JR11 may limit its role as a diagnostic pair for the theranostic approach with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA-JR11.

Phase I Trial of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Antagonist 177Lu-Satoreotide Tetraxetan

PURPOSE

Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) antagonists have shown higher tumor uptake and tumor-to-organ ratios than somatostatin agonists in preclinical models of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We performed a phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SSTR2 antagonist ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with advanced SSTR2-positive NETs were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. Patients first underwent a dosimetry study with ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan to determine the therapeutic activity that could be safely administered. This activity was split into two equal cycles to be delivered 3 months apart. The maximum activity was 7.4 GBq per cycle.

RESULTS

Of 20 patients with NETs (one lung, seven small bowel, nine pancreatic, one gastric, one rectal, one kidney; mean prior treatments: three), six received one cycle of ¹⁷⁷Lu- satoreotide tetraxetan and 14 received two cycles. Hematologic toxicity after cycle 1 was mild-moderate and reversed before cycle 2. However, grade 4 hematologic toxicity occurred in four of seven (57%) patients after cycle 2 of ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. The study was suspended, and the protocol modified to limit the cumulative absorbed bone marrow dose to 1 Gy and to reduce prescribed activity for cycle 2 by 50%. The best overall response rate was 45% [5% complete response (1/20), 40% partial response (8/20)]; with 40% stable disease (8/20) and 15% progression of disease (3/20). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.0 months (95% CI, 13.6-NR).

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial of heavily treated NETs, preliminary data are promising for the use of ¹⁷⁷Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. Additional studies are ongoing to determine optimal therapeutic dose/schedule.

Design and development of the theranostic pair 177 Lu-OPS201/68 Ga-OPS202 for targeting somatostatin receptor expressing tumors

Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (sstr) antagonists have shown superiority in different preclinical and clinical settings compared with the well-established and clinically used agonists for targeting sstr-expressing tumors, with regard to pharmacokinetics, tumor uptake, and retention. The theranostic pair ¹⁷⁷ Lu-OPS201/⁶⁸ Ga-OPS202, based on the sstr2 antagonist JR11 (Cpa-c[d-Cys-Aph(Hor)-d-Aph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys]-d-Tyr-NH₂ ), is the most advanced pair of the antagonist family in terms of preclinical development and is currently under clinical evaluation. OPS201 and OPS202 share the same amino acid sequence (JR11) but feature different conjugated chelators needed for radiolabeling, DOTA for OPS201 and NODAGA for OPS202. In this review, the design and development of the peptidic analog, JR11, and the selection of chelators and radiometals that led to ¹⁷⁷ Lu-OPS201/⁶⁸ Ga-OPS202 are discussed. Furthermore, the preclinical evaluation of both radiolabeled analogs from bench to bedside and the clinical trials involving the theranostic pair are presented.

Receptor radionuclide targeting for neuroendocrine tumors (NET) diagnostic and therapy

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from cells of neuroendocrine origin, which express somatostatin receptors (SSTR). This property allowed the successful development of radionuclides for diagnostic and peptide radionuclide radiation therapy (PRRT). This is the paradigm for the theragnostic concept in NET personalized medicine. The only phase III study to date (NETTER-1) clearly demonstrated the ability of ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-based PRRT to improve progression-free survival in advanced intestinal NETs. In clinical practice, the indications are limited to G1-G2 well-differentiated NETs with high expression of SSTR. NETs with a low tumor burden and slow progression are probably the optimal indication. This treatment is now available in France. However, its precise position in the treatment algorithm remains to be explored. We provide an overview of receptor radionuclide utilization and mechanism in diagnostic and pretherapeutic imaging and we focus on PRRT for endocrine tumors.

Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: New Advances for Improvement of Patient Management and Response

Compared to external beam radiotherapy, targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) allows for systemic radiation treatment of metastatic lesions. Published work on recent strategies to improve patient management and response to TRT through individualising patient treatment, modifying treatment pharmacokinetics and increasing anticancer potency are discussed in this review, with a special focus on the application of clinically evaluated radiolabelled ligands and peptides in the treatment of neuroendocrine and prostate cancers.