Can MRI be used to diagnose histologic grade in T1a (< 4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinomas?

Utility of multiparametric renal CT for differentiation of low-grade from high-grade cT1a clear cell renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine if CT can differentiate low-grade from high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) in cT1a solid ccRCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 78 < 4 cm solid (>25% enhancing) ccRCC in 78 patients with renal CT within 12 months of surgery between January 2016 and December 2019. Two radiologists (R1/R2), blinded to pathology, independently recorded mass:size, calcification, attenuation and heterogeneity (5-point Likert scale) and recorded a 5-point ccRCC CT Score. Multivariate logistic regression (LR) was performed.

RESULTS

There were 64.1% (50/78) low-grade (5/50 Grade 1 and 45/50 Grade 2) and 35.9% (28/78) high-grade (27/28 Grade 3 and 1/28 Grade 4) tumors.Unenhanced CT attenuation was higher (35.9±10.3 R1 and 34.9±10.7 R2 high-grade vs 29.7±10.2 R1 and 29.5±9.8 R2 low-grade, p=0.01-0.02), absolute corticomedullary phase attenuation ratio (CMphase-ratio; 0.67±0.16 R1 and 0.66±0.16 R2 vs 0.93±0.83 R1 and 0.80±0.33 R2, p=0.04-0.05) and 3-tiered stratification of CMphase-ratio (p=0.02) lower in high-grade tumors.A two-variable LR-model including unenhanced CT attenuation and CM.phase-ratio achieved area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of: 73% (95% confidence intervals 59-86%) and 72% (59-84%) for R1 and R2.ccRCC CT score differed by ccRCC grade (p<0.01 R1, R2) with high-grade tumors occurring most commonly in moderately enhancing ccRCC score 4 (46.4% [13/28] R1 and 54% [15/28]).

CONCLUSION

Among cT1a ccRCC, high-grade tumors have higher unenhanced CT attenuation and are less avidly enhancing.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

High-grade ccRCC have higher attenuation (possibly due to less microscopic fat) and lower corticomedullary phase enhancement compared to low-grade tumors. This may result in categorization of high-grade tumors in lower ccRCC diagnostic algorithm categories.

Using the "2 standard deviations" rule with Dixon MRI to differentiate renal cell carcinoma types

BACKGROUND

Clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are distinguishable based on microscopic fat, detectable by chemical shift MRI. However, these assessments are often subjective. Conversely, Dixon MRIs and the "2 standard deviations" rule (2SDR) are quantitative methods that may decrease diagnostic subjectivity. Therefore, this study assessed the value of the 2SDR for detecting microscopic fat and thus differentiating clear cell and non-clear cell RCC using Dixon MRI.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with RCC who underwent preoperative Dixon MRI. The patients were grouped based on tumor type: clear cell RCC and non-clear cell RCC. The 2SDR value was calculated based on in-phase and opposed-phase images and then compared between the two groups. 2SDR values >0 indicated clear cell RCCs, whereas values <0 indicated non-clear cell RCC.

RESULTS

We included 151 patients; 114 patients had clear cell RCC, of which 106 had a 2SDR value >0. Furthermore, 37 patients had non-clear cell RCC, of which 3 had a 2SDR value >0. The 2SDR value was significantly higher in the clear cell RCC group than in the non-clear cell RCC group (p = 0.000). Overall, 93.0% (106/114) and 8.1% (3/37) of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell RCC, respectively, had microscopic fat. The evaluation indices for this 2SDR method were: accuracy: 92.72%, sensitivity: 92.98%, specificity: 91.89%, positive predictive value: 97.25%, and negative predictive value: 80.95%.

CONCLUSIONS

2SDR values calculated from Dixon magnetic resonance images can differentiate clear cell from non-clear cell RCCs by detecting microscopic fat.

PRECIS

The "2 standard deviations" rule value calculated from Dixon MR images differentiates clear cell from non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma with high efficiency by detecting microscopic fat.

Application of different methods used to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient of renal cell carcinoma on the same lesion and its correlation with ISUP nuclear grading

PURPOSE

To determine the most frequently used different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement methods in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and their correlation with the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) histologic grading system.

METHODS

A total of 99 patients who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging and whose pathologic diagnosis of RCC was confirmed were included in the study. As a result of a literature review, region of interest (ROI) selection and measurement methods were determined in five ways. These included a small ROI (ADC1) on the solid part of the lesion showing the most restriction; a large ROI (ADC2) on the solid part of the lesion showing restriction; ROI (ADC3) that covered the lesion in the cross-section with the largest diameter, which was obtained by placing ROIs (ADC4) covering the lesion on all sections of the lesion; three small ROIs (ADC5) on solid parts of the lesion showing the most restriction. Then, ADC measurements were made from the contralateral normal kidney parenchyma. Tumors were pathologically subdivided [71 clear cell RCCs (ccRCC), 17 chromophobe RCCs (chRCC), 11 papillary RCCs (pRCC)], and graded according to the ISUP nuclear grading system (42 high-grade, 57 low-grade). Data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

In all measurement methods, ADC values of RCCs were statistically significantly lower than normal kidney ADC values. There were no differences between the ADC3 and ADC4 measurements of RCCs (p = 0.999). There was a statistical difference in other measurement methods (p < 0.001). There were differences between ccRCCs and pRCCs and chRCCs in all measurement methods. In all measurement methods, pRCC and chRCC ADC values ​​were lower than ccRCC ADC values. When ISUP nuclear grading and ADC values ​​were compared, there was a statistically inverse correlation between all ADC measurements. The strongest correlation was found in the ADC1 and ADC5 measurements. When the ADC values ​​of ISUP low and high-grade groups were compared, a significant difference was found in the ADC5 measurement method (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of the study, ADC5 is the measurement method that shows the best correlation with the ISUP histologic grading system. Therefore, we think that ADC5 can be the primary measurement method for determining the ADC value of RCCs.

A CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram Integrated With Clinic-Radiological Features for Preoperatively Predicting WHO/ISUP Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Objective

This study aims to develop and validate a CT-based radiomics nomogram integrated with clinic-radiological factors for preoperatively differentiating high-grade from low-grade clear cell renal cell carcinomas (CCRCCs).

Methods

370 patients with complete clinical, pathological, and CT image data were enrolled in this retrospective study, and were randomly divided into training and testing sets with a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics features were extracted from nephrographic phase (NP) contrast-enhanced images, and then a radiomics model was constructed by the selected radiomics features using a multivariable logistic regression combined with the most suitable feature selection algorithm determined by the comparison among least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), recursive feature elimination (RFE) and ReliefF. A clinical model was established using clinical and radiological features. A radiomics nomogram was constructed by integrating the radiomics signature and independent clinic-radiological features. Performance of these three models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, three clinic-radiological features including intratumoral necrosis (OR=3.00, 95% CI=1.30-6.90, p=0.049), intratumoral angiogenesis (OR=3.28, 95% CI=1.22-8.78, p=0.018), and perinephric metastasis (OR=2.90, 95% CI=1.03-8.17, p=0.044) were found to be independent predictors of WHO/ISUP grade in CCRCC. Incorporating the above clinic-radiological predictors and radiomics signature constructed by LASSO, a CT-based radiomics nomogram was developed, and presented better predictive performance than clinic-radiological model and radiomics signature model, with an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI=0.832-0.962) and 0.843 (95% CI=0.718-0.975) in the training and testing sets, respectively. DCA indicated that the nomogram has potential clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

The CT-based radiomics nomogram is a promising tool to predict WHO/ISUP grade of CCRCC preoperatively and noninvasively.

Association between nuclear grade of renal cell carcinoma and the aorta-lesion-attenuation-difference

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Several features noted on renal mass biopsy (RMB) can influence treatment selection including tumor histology and nuclear grade. However, there is poor concordance between renal cell carcinoma (RCC) nuclear grade on RMB compared to nephrectomy specimens. Here, we evaluate the association of nuclear grade with aorta-lesion-attenuation-difference (ALAD) values determined on preoperative CT scan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of preoperative CT scans and surgical pathology was performed on patients undergoing nephrectomy for solid renal masses. ALAD was calculated by measuring the difference in Hounsfield units (HU) between the aorta and the lesion of interest on the same image slice on preoperative CT scan. The discriminative ability of ALAD to differentiate low-grade (nuclear grade 1 and 2) and high-grade (nuclear grade 3 and 4) tumors was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under curve (AUC) using ROC analysis. Sub-group analysis by histologic sub-type was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 368 preoperative CT scans in patients with RCC on nephrectomy specimen were reviewed. Median patient age was 61 years (IQR 52-68). The majority of patients were male, 66% (243/368). Tumor histology was chromophobe RCC in 7.6%, papillary RCC in 15.5%, and clear cell RCC in 76.9%. The majority, 69.3% (253/365) of tumors, were stage T1a. Nuclear grade was grade 1 in 5.46% (19/348), grade 2 in 64.7% (225/348), grade 3 in 26.2% (91/348), and grade 4 in 3.2% (11/348). Nephrographic ALAD values for grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 73.7, 46.5, 36.4, and 43.1, respectively (p = 0.0043). Nephrographic ALAD was able to differentiate low-grade from high-grade RCC with a sensitivity of 32%, specificity of 89%, PPV of 86%, and NPV of 36%. ROC analysis demonstrated the predictive utility of nephrographic ALAD to predict high- versus low-grade RCC with an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.69).

CONCLUSION

ALAD was significantly associated with nuclear grade in our nephrectomy series. Strong specificity and PPV for the nephrographic phrase demonstrate a potential role for ALAD in the pre-operative setting that may augment RMB findings in assessing nuclear grade of RCC. Although this association was statistically significant, the clinical utility is limited at this time given the results of the statistical analysis (relatively poor ROC analysis). Sub-group analysis by histologic subtype yielded very similar diagnostic performance and limitations of ALAD. Further studies are necessary to evaluate this relationship further.

[Dignity of Small Renal Masses: Implications for Diagnostics and Therapy]

Dignity of Small Renal Masses: Implications for Diagnostics and Therapy Abstract. The ubiquitous availability of radiological imaging has increased the diagnosis of renal incidentalomas with a diameter ≤4 cm. If malignancy is suspected, these are often treated surgically without prior biopsy. However, several studies demonstrate a relevant proportion of benign tumors, equating to a degree of overtreatment. There are no Swiss data available. Renal tumors resected in our center between 2006 and 2014 (n = 404) were retrospectively examined for size on cross-sectional imaging and their respective histology, identifying 221 (54.7 %) small renal masses with a diameter ≤4 cm. Of these, 62 (28 %) were benign and three (1.4 %) were of unclear or low malignant potential. Among the remaining 156 malignancies, 116 (74.4 %) were classified as prognostically favorable, allowing for active surveillance, if the patient's clinical context allows.

Identification of sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma by machine learning on multiparametric MRI

Sarcomatoid differentiation in RCC (sRCC) is associated with a poor prognosis, necessitating more aggressive management than RCC without sarcomatoid components (nsRCC). Since suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors are not routinely biopsied for histologic evaluation, there is a clinical need for a non-invasive method to detect sarcomatoid differentiation pre-operatively. We utilized unsupervised self-organizing map (SOM) and supervised Learning Vector Quantizer (LVQ) machine learning to classify RCC tumors on T2-weighted, non-contrast T1-weighted fat-saturated, contrast-enhanced arterial-phase T1-weighted fat-saturated, and contrast-enhanced venous-phase T1-weighted fat-saturated MRI images. The SOM was trained on 8 nsRCC and 8 sRCC tumors, and used to compute Activation Maps for each training, validation (3 nsRCC and 3 sRCC), and test (5 nsRCC and 5 sRCC) tumor. The LVQ classifier was trained and optimized on Activation Maps from the 22 training and validation cohort tumors, and tested on Activation Maps of the 10 unseen test tumors. In this preliminary study, the SOM-LVQ model achieved a hold-out testing accuracy of 70% in the task of identifying sarcomatoid differentiation in RCC on standard multiparameter MRI (mpMRI) images. We have demonstrated a combined SOM-LVQ machine learning approach that is suitable for analysis of limited mpMRI datasets for the task of differential diagnosis.

A CT-Based Radiomics Approach for the Differential Diagnosis of Sarcomatoid and Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

This study was aimed at building a computed tomography- (CT-) based radiomics approach for the differentiation of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (SRCC) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). It involved 29 SRCC and 99 CCRCC patient cases, and to each case, 1029 features were collected from each of the corticomedullary phase (CMP) and nephrographic phase (NP) image. Then, features were selected by using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method and the selected features of the two phases were explored to build three radiomics approaches for SRCC and CCRCC classification. Meanwhile, subjective CT findings were filtered by univariate analysis to construct a radiomics model and further selected by Akaike information criterion for integrating with the selected image features to build the fifth model. Finally, the radiomics models utilized the multivariate logistic regression method for classification and the performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and DeLong test. The radiomics models based on the CMP, the NP, the CMP and NP, the subjective findings, and the combined features achieved the AUC (area under the curve) value of 0.772, 0.938, 0.966, 0.792, and 0.974, respectively. Significant difference was found in AUC values between each of the CMP radiomics model (0.0001 ≤ p ≤ 0.0051) and the subjective findings model (0.0006 ≤ p ≤ 0.0079) and each of the NP radiomics model, the CMP and NP radiomics model, and the combined model. Sarcomatoid change is a common pathway of dedifferentiation likely occurring in all subtypes of renal cell carcinoma, and the CT-based radiomics approaches in this study show the potential for SRCC from CCRCC differentiation.

Diagnostic test accuracy of ADC values for identification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of renal tumor subtypes and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of ADC for differentiation of localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from other renal tumor types.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published until May 1, 2019, that reported ADC values of renal tumors. Methodological quality was evaluated. For the meta-analysis on diagnostic test accuracy of ADC for differentiation of ccRCC from other renal lesions, we applied a bivariate random-effects model and compared two subgroups of ADC measurement with vs. without cystic and necrotic areas.

RESULTS

We included 48 studies (2588 lesions) in the systematic review and 13 studies (1126 lesions) in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in ADC of renal parenchyma using b values of 0-800 vs. 0-1000 (p = 0.08). ADC measured on selected portions (sADC) excluding cystic and necrotic areas differed significantly from whole-lesion ADC (wADC) (p = 0.002). Compared to ccRCC, minimal-fat angiomyolipoma, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC showed significantly lower sADC while oncocytoma exhibited higher sADC. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity to differentiate ccRCC from other tumors were 80% (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) and 78% (95% CI, 0.64-0.89), respectively, for sADC and 77% (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) and 77% (95% CI, 0.69-0.86) for wADC. sADC offered a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve than wADC (0.852 vs. 0.785, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values of kidney tumors that exclude cystic or necrotic areas more accurately differentiate ccRCC from other renal tumor types than whole-lesion ADC values.

KEY POINTS

• Selective ADC of renal tumors, excluding cystic and necrotic areas, provides better discriminatory ability than whole-lesion ADC to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.852 vs. 0.785, respectively (p = 0.02). • Selective ADC of renal masses provides moderate sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 78%, respectively, for differentiation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, oncocytoma, and minimal-fat angiomyolipoma. • Selective ADC excluding cystic and necrotic areas are preferable to whole-lesion ADC as an additional tool to multiphasic MRI to differentiate clear cell RCC from other renal lesions whether the highest b value is 800 or 1000.

Predictive Value of In Vivo MR Spectroscopy With Semilocalization by Adiabatic Selective Refocusing in Differentiating Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of in vivo MR spectroscopy (MRS) with semilocalization by adiabatic selective refocusing (semi-LASER MRS) in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from the non-clear cell subtype. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixteen patients with biopsy-proven RCC or masses highly suspicious for RCC were prospectively recruited to participate in the study. Single-voxel ¹H spectra were acquired using a 3-T MRI system, with a semi-LASER sequence acquired for renal tumors in 14 patients and for healthy renal tissue (control tissue) in 12 patients. Offline processing of the MR spectra was performed. MRI and spectra analysis were performed independently by radiologists who were blinded to the reference histopathologic findings. RESULTS. Semi-LASER MRS was diagnostic for nine of 11 patients (82%) with histopathologically proven clear cell RCC, showing a strong lipid peak in seven patients and a weaker lipid resonance in two others, whereas control spectra showed weakly positive findings in only one patient. MRS findings were negative for lipid resonance in two of three patients (67%) with non-clear cell tumors and were weakly positive in another patient. Semi-LASER MRS had a high sensitivity and positive predictive value of 82% and 90%, respectively, in addition to a specificity of 67%, a negative predictive value of 50%, and overall accuracy of 79% for the detection of clear cell RCC. Lipid resonance was detected by MRS for four of six clear cell RCCs with no intravoxel fat on chemical-shift MRI. CONCLUSION. The preliminary results of the present study show that semi-LASER MRS is promising for the noninvasive discrimination of clear cell RCC from non-clear cell RCC on the basis of detection of lipid resonance and that it provides an incremental yield compared with chemical-shift MRI.