Hepatic involvement in hypereosinophilic syndrome: value of portal venous phase imaging

CT and MRI findings in focal eosinophilic infiltration of the liver

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the findings of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of focal eosinophilic infiltration (FEI) of the liver.

METHODS

A retrospective study including 29 patients with confirmed FEI of the liver was performed. We evaluated the lesions' number, distribution, size, shape, margin, attenuation or signal intensity characteristics, the enhancement pattern, and some special features. Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the number of lesions and the eosinophil counts in peripheral blood.

RESULTS

In all, 108 lesions were detected in 29 cases, including two cases with single lesion and the remaining 27 cases with multiple lesions. The mean size of all lesions was 34 mm (range, from 3 to 61 mm). 95 (88%) lesions were located in subcapsular parenchyma or surrounding the portal vein. Most (66%) subcapsular lesions were wedge shaped and all lesions surrounding portal vein were round shaped. However, the hepatic parenchymal lesions were irregular or round shaped. All lesions showed ill-defined margins. On pre-contrast CT images, the lesions showed slightly low attenuation or iso-attenuating. On T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, the lesions were slightly iso-/hypointense and hyperintense, respectively. A total of 23 (79.3%) cases were gradually enhanced. Branches of portal vein went through the lesions in all cases; 12 had 'stripe sign' and 16 had 'halo ring sign.' Spearman analysis indicated a significant correlation between the number of lesions and the increased eosinophils in peripheral blood (r = 0.627, p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Special CT and MRI features and increased eosinophils may strongly suggest the diagnosis of FEI of the liver.

Focal eosinophilic necrosis on superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MRI for distinguishing focal eosinophilic necrosis (FEN) from hepatic metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one cases of FEN in 41 patients and 40 hepatic metastases in 40 patients were analyzed on unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted MRI retrospectively. Depending on the extent of the remaining hyperintense area on SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted images compared with the unenhanced images, the lesions were classified into four categories--category 1, less than 25%; category 2, 25-49%; category 3, 50-75%; and category 4, more than 75%--by two independent readers. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured using the same region of interest on unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted images. In three pathologic specimens of FEN, the number of Kupffer cells was compared with that of background hepatic parenchyma.

RESULTS

All metastases were classified as category 4, whereas FEN showed various distributions overall (category 1, 45.2%; category 2, 24.6%; category 3, 13.4%; category 4, 17.1%). FEN showed a decrease in CNR (from 7.9 +/- 5.8 to 6.1 +/- 5.6, p < 0.05), and metastases showed an increase in CNR (from 33.7 +/- 27.0 to 55.0 +/- 44.3, p < 0.05) after SPIO administration. In biopsy specimens, FEN had many more Kupffer cells (174.7 +/- 120.3 cells/high-power field [hpf]) than background hepatic parenchyma (23.7 +/- 9.8 cells/hpf). When using signal loss categories 1, 2, or 3 or CNR decrease, the accuracy of SPIO enhancement was 88.3%.

CONCLUSION

Unlike hepatic metastases, most of the cases of FEN showed a reduction in the extent of hyperintense area or a decrease in CNR after SPIO administration on the T2-weighted images. Therefore, SPIO-enhanced T2-weighted MRI can help to differentially diagnose FEN from metastases.

Hepatic Visceral Larva Migrans ofToxocara canis: CT and Sonographic Findings

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the CT and sonographic findings of hepatic visceral larva migrans of Toxocara canis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients (44 men, 10 women; age range, 30-80 years; mean age, 53 years) with serologically confirmed visceral larva migrans of Toxocara canis underwent evaluation of the liver with CT (n = 25), sonography (n = 48), or both. Two radiologists used consensus for retrospective evaluation of CT and sonographic findings. Correlation between the presence and severity of hepatic abnormalities on images and the degree of peripheral eosinophilia was assessed.

RESULTS

Seventeen (68%) of 25 patients who underwent CT had single or multiple ill-defined, oval or elongated, small, low-attenuating lesions in the liver. Eighteen (38%) of 48 patients who underwent sonography had single or multiple small, poorly defined, oval or elongated, hypoechoic scattered focal lesions in the liver. In the 19 patients who underwent both CT and sonography, the two techniques had no significant difference in rate of detection of hepatic lesions (p = 0.375, McNemar test). The lesion numbers on CT and sonography showed excellent linear correlation (r = 0.844, p = 0.001) by Pearson's correlation test. An independent samples t test showed that eosinophil count and percentage in the peripheral blood were significantly higher in patients with hepatic lesions on CT and sonography than in patients without lesions.

CONCLUSION

CT and sonographic findings of hepatic visceral larva migrans of T. canis are multiple, ill-defined, oval or elongated, small, nodular lesions scattered in the liver parenchyma. The presence of hepatic lesions on images was associated with higher peripheral eosinophil count and percentage.

Eosinophilic Hepatic Necrosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the findings of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with those of computed tomography (CT) of focal liver lesions related to peripheral eosinophilia.

METHODS

For 12 patients with peripheral eosinophilia (>7%) examined with hepatic MR imaging and CT, 52 focal hepatic lesions larger than 0.5 cm, including 31 lesions simultaneously found on the 2 imaging modalities, were subjected to a comparative analysis of their imaging features.

RESULTS

The total number of lesions distinguished from background liver was 39 (75%) on MR imaging and 44 (85%) on CT scans. On arterial phase images of 10 patients with comparable data, homogeneously hyperintense lesions were demonstrated more frequently (P = 0.006) on MR imaging (16 [50%] of 32 lesions) than on CT scans (4 [13%] of 32 lesions). Only 7 (22%) of the 32 hypoattenuating lesions on portal phase CT were depicted as hypointense lesions on portal phase MR images in 12 patients. On delayed phase images in 8 patients, the number of hyperintense lesions on MR images (9 [56%] of 16) was greater (P = 0.077) than that seen on the CT scans (4 [25%] of 16).

CONCLUSIONS

For many focal hepatic lesions related to peripheral eosinophilia, dynamic MR imaging more easily demonstrates lesional enhancement on arterial and delayed phases than CT scans. Because of the higher degree of lesional enhancement of MR imaging compared with CT, the lesion-to-liver contrast may not be sufficient to distinguish the lesion from the background liver, resulting in decreased sensitivity of portal phase dynamic MR imaging.

Focal Eosinophilic Necrosis Versus Metastasis in the Liver: The Usefulness of Two-Phase Dynamic CT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of dual-phase dynamic CT in the differentiation of focal eosinophilic necrosis of the liver and metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Undetected isoattenuating lesions on arterial phase images that have an indistinct margin, a nonspherical shape, and a homogenous enhancement pattern on portal venous phase images suggest focal eosinophilic necrosis rather than metastasis. Two-phase dynamic CT was found to be useful at differentiating focal eosinophilic necrosis from metastasis.

MR Findings in Eosinophilic Infiltration of the Liver

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of focal eosinophilic infiltration of the liver.

METHODS

Contrast-enhanced MR images of 8 patients with focal hepatic eosinophilic infiltration were reviewed retrospectively. We evaluated the signal intensity of focal lesions in T1-weighted and T2-weighted images and the pattern of enhancement in a dynamic contrast study.

RESULTS

A total 22 focal hepatic lesions were observed; the lesions were isointense (55%) or hypointense (45%) on T1-weighted images and isointense (14%) or hyperintense (86%) on T2-weighted images. The arterial phase of the contrast study revealed 11 hyperintense lesions (50%). During the portal and delayed phases, 18 (82%) and 17 lesions (77%) were hyperintense, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The focal eosinophilic infiltrations showed homogeneous enhancement in the portal and delayed phases in the dynamic contrast MR study. These findings should help to distinguish focal eosinophilic infiltration, especially from metastasis in patients with malignancy.

Focal eosinophilic necrosis of the liver in patients with underlying gastric or colorectal cancer: CT differentiation from metastasis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the helical CT findings which help differentiate between focal eosinophilic necrosis (FEN) of the liver and metastasis in patients with underlying gastric or colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 21 patients with underlying gastric and colorectal cancer examined during a recent 18-month period, the presence of FEN (n=90) was proven at CT. The diagnosis was verified by biopsy in eight patients and by the transient nature of the findings related to peripheral eosinophilia (>10%) in the remainder. For comparison, 20 consecutive patients with pathologically proven hepatic metastasis from gastric or colorectal cancer (n=158) were selected. Single-phase helical CT images (7-mm collimation, pitch 1:1) were independently analyzed in a random order by two blinded readers. The parameters evaluated included the margin (depicted border, fuzzy), shape (spherical, non-spherical), attenuation (subtle hypoattenuation, hypoattenuation), and the presence or absence of rim enhancement.

RESULTS

FEN far more frequently showed a fuzzy margin (81%, 84%), subtle hypoattenuation (89%, 91%), and a non-spherical shape (84% for both readers) than metastasis, for which the respective findings were 6%, 22%; 20%, 39%; and 15%, 23%. Rim enhancement was seldom found in FEN (0%, 2%), but was recognized by both readers in 40% of metastases. For all parameters, the results were statistically significant (p < .01), and showed that both readers correctly differentiated FEN from metastasis in 78% of the patients (32/41). Interobserver agreement was, in addition, excellent (kappa = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

When focal hepatic lesions with a fuzzy margin, non-spherical shape and subtle hypoattenuation without rim enhancement are found, the possibility of FEN should be considered even in patients with underlying gastrointestinal malignancy.

Hypereosinophilic syndrome: CT findings in patients with hepatic lobar or segmental involvement

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the CT findings of hepatic hypereosinophilic syndrome in which hepatic lobes or segments were involved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome with hepatic lobar or segmental involvement were included in our study. In all seven, diagnosis was based on liver biopsy and the results of corticosteroid treatment. CT findings were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists, who reached a consensus. Biopsy specimens were examined, with special reference to portal and periportal inflammation.

RESULTS

CT demonstrated well-defined, homogeneous or heterogeneous low attenuation with a straight margin limited to a hepatic lobe (n = 2), segments (n = 3), or subsegments (n = 2), particularly during the portal phase. Where there was subsegmental involvement, lesions were multiple, ovoid or wedge-shaped, and showed low attenuation. In two patients with lobar or segmental involvement, segmental portal vein narrowing was observed. Histopathologic examination disclosed eosinophilic infiltration in the periportal area, sinusoids and central veins, as well as portal phlebitis.

CONCLUSION

Hypereosinophilic syndrome may involve the presence of hepatic lobar, segmental, or subsegmental low-attenuated lesions, as seen on CT images. Their presence may be related to damage of the liver parenchyma and to portal phlebitis.