99mTc-CD19 monoclonal antibody is not useful for imaging of B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

New PET Tracers for Lymphoma

While functional imaging with [18F]Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography is a well-established imaging modality in most lymphoma entities, novel tracers addressing cell surface receptors, tumor biology, and the microenvironment are being developed. Especially, with the emergence of immuno-PET targeting surface markers of lymphoma cells, a new imaging modality of immunotherapies is evolving, which might especially aid in relapsed and refractory disease stages. This review highlights different new PET tracers in indolent and aggressive lymphoma subtypes and summarizes the current state of immuno-PET imaging in lymphoma.

ImmunoPET imaging of hematological malignancies: From preclinical promise to clinical reality

Immuno-positron emission tomography (immunoPET) imaging is a paradigm-shifting imaging technique for whole-body and all-lesion tumor detection, based on the combined specificity of tumor-targeting vectors [e.g., monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), nanobodies, and bispecific antibodies] and the sensitivity of PET imaging. By noninvasively, comprehensively, and serially revealing heterogeneous tumor antigen expression, immunoPET imaging is gradually improving the theranostic prospects for hematological malignancies. In this review, we summarize the available literature regarding immunoPET in imaging hematological malignancies. We also highlight the pros and cons of current conjugation strategies, and modular chemistry that can be leveraged to develop novel immunoPET probes for hematological malignancies. Lastly, we discuss the use of immunoPET imaging in guiding antibody drug development.

Imaging Neuroinflammation - from Bench to Bedside

Neuroinflammation plays a central role in a variety of neurological diseases, including stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and malignant CNS neoplasms, among many other. Different cell types and molecular mediators participate in a cascade of events in the brain that is ultimately aimed at control, regeneration and repair, but leads to damage of brain tissue under pathological conditions. Non-invasive molecular imaging of key players in the inflammation cascade holds promise for identification and quantification of the disease process before it is too late for effective therapeutic intervention. In this review, we focus on molecular imaging techniques that target inflammatory cells and molecules that are of interest in neuroinflammation, especially those with high translational potential. Over the past decade, a plethora of molecular imaging agents have been developed and tested in animal models of (neuro)inflammation, and a few have been translated from bench to bedside. The most promising imaging techniques to visualize neuroinflammation include MRI, positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and optical imaging methods. These techniques enable us to image adhesion molecules to visualize endothelial cell activation, assess leukocyte functions such as oxidative stress, granule release, and phagocytosis, and label a variety of inflammatory cells for cell tracking experiments. In addition, several cell types and their activation can be specifically targeted in vivo, and consequences of neuroinflammation such as neuronal death and demyelination can be quantified. As we continue to make progress in utilizing molecular imaging technology to study and understand neuroinflammation, increasing efforts and investment should be made to bring more of these novel imaging agents from the “bench to bedside.”

Evaluation of CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR Targeting for Radioimmunotherapy of B-Cell Lymphomas

Despite the promise of radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20 antibodies (Ab) for the treatment of relapsed patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), most patients treated with conventional doses of (131)I-tositumomab or (90)Y-ibritumomab eventually relapse. We did comparative assessments using conventional radioimmunotherapy targeting CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR on human Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 lymphoma xenografts in athymic mice to assess the potential for improving the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy by targeting other NHL cell surface antigens. Results of biodistribution studies showed significant differences in tumor localization consistent with variable antigenic expression on the different lymphoma cell lines. Interestingly, the radioimmunoconjugate that yielded the best tumor-to-normal organ ratios differed in each tumor model. We also explored administering all three (111)In-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacylododecane N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid antibodies in combination, but discovered, surprisingly, that this approach did not augment the localization of radioactivity to tumors compared with the administration of the best single radiolabeled Ab alone. These data suggest that conventional radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20, anti-HLA-DR, or anti-CD22 Abs is effective when used singly and provides targeted uptake of radiolabel into the tumor that is dependent on the levels of antigen expression. Improvements in tumor-to-normal organ ratios of radioactivity cannot be achieved using directly labeled Abs in combination but may be afforded by novel pretargeting methods.

Comparison of a tetravalent single-chain antibody-streptavidin fusion protein and an antibody-streptavidin chemical conjugate for pretargeted anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphomas

The efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) for patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is limited by nonspecific delivery of radiation to normal tissues due to the long circulating half-life of radiolabeled anti-CD20 antibodies (Abs). Pretargeted RIT using a covalent conjugate of the 1F5 anti-CD20 Ab with streptavidin (SA) has been shown to augment the efficacy of RIT and decrease toxicity compared with a directly labeled 1F5 Ab. We have engineered a tetravalent singlechain 1F5 (scFv)4SA fusion protein and compared it to the 1F5-SA conjugate. Athymic mice bearing Ramos lymphoma xenografts received either the conjugate or fusion protein, followed 20 hours later by a biotin-N-acetyl-galactosamine clearing agent, followed 4 hours later by 111In-DOTA-biotin. After 24 hours, 11.4% +/- 2.1% of the injected dose of radionuclide was present per gram of tumor (% ID/g) using 1F5 (scFv)4SA compared with 10.8% +/- 2.5% ID/g with 1F5 Ab-SA. Superior tumor-to-normal organ ratios of radioactivity were consistently seen using the fusion protein compared with the chemical conjugate (eg, tumor-to-blood ratio > 65:1 after 48 hours with the fusion protein, but < 7:1 with the conjugate). More than 90% of lymphomabearing mice could be cured with minimal toxicity using either reagent followed by 1200 muCi (44.4 MBq) 90Y-DOTA-biotin.

New strategies in radioimmunotherapy for lymphoma

Treatment options for patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma historically involved radiation or chemotherapy. Although initial response rates are excellent, treatment is increasingly less effective with each successive relapse. The advent of immunotherapy heralds a new era for the treatment of these patients. Radioimmunotherapy adds the benefits of cytotoxic radiation to immunotherapy and represents a significant addition to the treatment armamentarium. Various antigens for lymphoma have been targeted, of which anti-CD20 antibodies are the furthest in development. Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin; IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA), a (90)yttrium-labeled agent, and (131)iodine-labeled tositumomab (Bexxar; Corixa, Seattle, WA) are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Both agents have shown utility in therapy for relapsed and refractory low-grade and transformed lymphomas. This review highlights features of radioimmunotherapy that are relevant to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, focusing on the two anti-CD20 antibodies.

Radioimmunotherapy for model B cell malignancies using 90Y-labeled anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies

In recent years, radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with beta(-) particle emitting radionuclides targeting the CD20 antigen on B cells in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has provided the most compelling human clinical data for the success of RIT. CD19, like CD20, is an antigen expressed on the surface of cells of the B lineage, and CD19 may provide an alternative target for radioimmunotherapy of B cell neoplasms. CD19 has been largely overlooked as a target for conventional 131I RIT, because the antigen rapidly internalizes upon binding of antibody, resulting in catabolism and significant release of 131I. Such modulation may be an advantage to RIT with radiometals such as 90Y, 177Lu, 213Bi and 225Ac. Herein, we have compared beta(-) particle RIT with antibodies targeting either CD19 or CD20. The anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 antibodies, B4 or C2B8, respectively, were appended with the SCN-CHX-A''-DTPA bifunctional chelating agent and labeled with 90Y. In the tumor model used, there were three times as many CD20 target sites on lymphoma cells as compared to CD19 sites (62000 vs 20000 binding sites, respectively). We compared the efficacy of the 90Y-labeled antibodies to reduce lymphoma in a nude mouse xenograft solid tumor model, after measurable lymphoma appeared. Reduction in tumor size began at day 3 in all three 90Y-treated groups, but tumor began to recur in many animals 9 days after the treatments. There was one cure in each specific treatment group. In contrast, the tumor in the two control groups showed no regression. There was a significant prolongation of median survival time from xenograft (P < 0.0001) in all the 90Y-labeled antibody construct-treated groups (32 days for 0.15 mCi 90Y-B4; 26 days for 0.20 mCi 90Y-C2B8, and 23 days for 0.15 mCi 90Y-C2B8) in comparison to the two control groups (11 days for 0.02 mg of C2B8 and 9 days for untreated growth controls). Specificity of the radioimmunotherapy was also shown. In conclusion, 90Y-labeled anti-CD19 antibody has efficacy comparable to 90Y-labeled anti-CD20 antibody in the treatment of mice bearing human lymphoma xenografts. These data suggest that CD19-targeted RIT merits further study.

Immunotherapy of Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Recent years have witnessed the development of a variety of promising immunotherapies for treating patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Foremost among these advances is the exciting success of monoclonal antibodies directed against lymphocyte surface antigens. Rituximab is a chimeric (human-mouse) anti-CD20 antibody that induces responses in approximately half of the patients with relapsed indolent lymphomas and a third of patients with relapsed aggressive lymphomas when used as a single agent. Response rates appear even higher (up to 70%) for newly diagnosed patients treated with Rituximab monotherapy. Other promising antibodies for treatment of B cell malignancies include epratuzumab (anti-CD22), CAMPATH-1H (anti-CD52w), and Hu1D10 (anti-class II HLA). Even more exciting than antibody monotherapy is the prospect of combination antibody therapy (e.g. rituximab + epratuzumab) or combination chemotherapy and antibody therapy. In this regard, a recent phase III randomized trial from the GELA group in France demonstrated statistically significantly superior complete and overall response rates and superior event-free and overall survivals for elderly patients with newly diagnosed diffuse aggressive B cell lymphomas treated with CHOP + rituximab compared with CHOP alone. Confirmatory cooperative group trials combining chemotherapy with antibody therapies are currently underway. Another approach to augment the efficacy of antibodies is to deploy them in radiolabeled form. Iodine-131, Yttrium-90, and Copper-67 labeled monoclonal antibodies targeting CD-20, CD-22, HLA class II, and other cell surface antigens have been tested and demonstrate higher overall response rates (50-80%) and complete response rates (20-40%) than unlabeled antibodies. Pilot studies combining radiolabeled antibodies with either standard dose chemotherapy or myeloablative chemoradiotherapy with stem cell transplantation also appear very promising. Lymphoma vaccines have also produced very encouraging results in single institution studies at Stanford and the National Cancer Institute, with responding patients demonstrating superior event-free and overall survival than historical controls. Phase III randomized trials of idiotype vaccines are currently underway and novel new vaccine approaches are also being tested.