Stage-dependant management of septic arthritis of the shoulder in adults

Upper extremity infection: imaging features with focus on magnetic resonance imaging

Upper extremity infections are frequently seen, especially in individuals with weakened immune system, posttraumatic events, and after surgery procedures. If not properly treated, such conditions can lead to serious consequences, such as movement impairment, amputation, and even mortality. These infections have the potential to spread extensively from their initial site of entry, traversing interconnected spaces either intra or extra-compartmental. Understanding the relevant anatomy is crucial to assess location and stage of infection, since surgical intervention and intravenous antibiotics are usually required. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the imaging findings of upper extremity infection, focusing on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Furthermore, this article sheds light on the pivotal role of radiology in managing hand, elbow, and shoulder infections offering an overview of available treatment options. KEY FINDINGS: Various types of infections affecting the upper extremity will be discussed, including infectious tenosynovitis, deep space infections, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis. Authors also highlight anatomical spaces, common pathogens, spread routes, and key radiological features of these conditions.

Microbiological Profile and Clinical Features of Septic Arthritis of the Shoulder: A 10-Year Cohort Single-Centre Study

Introduction  Septic arthritis (SA) constitutes a pressing orthopedic emergency characterized by acute, non-traumatic joint pain. Timely diagnosis and intervention are imperative to avert complications such as chondrolysis and systemic sepsis. The etiology is predominantly hematogenous, necessitating an integrated approach involving surgical and microbiological modalities. Shoulder aspiration and microbiological analysis play pivotal roles in guiding treatment, especially when positive findings prompt more aggressive therapeutic strategies. This study aims to elucidate the nuanced clinical and epidemiological characteristics of septic arthritis in both native and prosthetic joints within a singular institutional cohort over a decade. Methods  This retrospective case series analysis spanned a 10-year period, focusing on non-prosthetic shoulder joints from January 2012 to July 2021. In this timeframe, only 183 aspirations were performed and sent to the microbiology department for analysis, including cultures, microscopy, and antibiotic sensitivity tests for positive cultures. The study delved into the microbiological profile of infections, encompassing gram stain, culture positivity rates, identification of microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Additionally, the incidence of primary joint infections with resistant strains, particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), was scrutinized. Statistical analysis utilized the SPSS program version 20.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York), with a significance level set at 5%. The project, registered with the trust's clinical audit department (Reg #5372), adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. Data collection involved extracting non-identifiable patient modifiers from the laboratory database bank into Excel spreadsheets. Results  The study included 183 patients, with 108 (59%) females and 75 (41%) males. The average age was 76.2±16.5 years. Among them, 138 (75.4%) reported pain, and 15 (8.2%) had a body temperature over 37.8°C. Lab results showed a mean white blood cell count of 11.6±4.5 and an average C-reactive protein level of 121.7±102.1. Leucocytosis (>11,000 WBC) was seen in 82 (44.8%) cases. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP; >10 mg/dl) was found in 136 (74.3%) patients. Synovial fluid analysis revealed no crystals in 91.3% of cases. Microbial resistance analysis showed 19 strains resistant to co-trimoxazole and 11 to erythromycin. Among co-trimoxazole-resistant strains, 73.7% were Staphylococcus aureus, a statistically significant association (p<0.001). Conclusion The evolving sensitivity patterns of microbes in septic arthritis underscore the necessity to reassess empirical antibiotic therapy. Subsequent joint damage resulting from infection can result in substantial disability.

The evaluation, classification, and management of septic arthritis of the shoulder: the comprehensive shoulder sepsis system

BACKGROUND

Septic arthritis of the shoulder is distinctly challenging to diagnose and treat. Guidelines for appropriate workup and management are limited and do not account for the variations in clinical presentation. The purpose of this study was to present a comprehensive and anatomically based classification system and treatment algorithm for septic arthritis of the native shoulder joint.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective analysis of all patients treated surgically for septic arthritis of the native shoulder joint was performed at 2 tertiary care academic institutions. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and operative reports were used to classify patients as having 1 of 3 infection subtypes: type I, confined to the glenohumeral joint; type II, extra-articular extension; or type III, concomitant osteomyelitis. On the basis of these clinical groupings of patients, the comorbidities, types of surgical management, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five shoulders in 64 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Of these infected shoulders, 9.2% had type I infections, 47.7% had type II, and 43.1% had type III. Age and the time between symptom onset and diagnosis were the only significant risk factors for the development of a more severe infection. Fifty-seven percent of shoulder aspirates revealed cell counts below the standard surgical cutoff of 50,000 cells/mL. On average, each patient required 2.2 surgical débridements to eradicate the infection. Infections recurred in 8 shoulders (12.3%). Body mass index was the only risk factor for recurrence of infection. Of the 64 patients, 1 (1.6%) died acutely of sepsis and multiorgan system failure.

CONCLUSION

We propose a comprehensive system for the classification and management of spontaneous shoulder sepsis based on stage and anatomy. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can help determine the severity of disease and aid in surgical decision making. A systematic approach to septic arthritis of the shoulder as a unique entity from septic arthritis of other large peripheral joints may lead to more timely diagnosis and treatment and improve the overall prognosis.

Re-operation rates of arthroscopic management versus arthrotomy in treatment of septic arthritis of native shoulder joint in adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Previous studies have reported concern regarding high reoperation rates when septic arthritis of the native shoulder is treated arthroscopically, compared to open arthrotomy. We aimed to compare re-operation rate between the two strategies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The review was registered prospectively at PROSPERO, (CRD42021226518). We searched common databases and references lists (8 February 2021). The inclusion criteria included interventional or observational studies of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of native shoulder joint septic arthritis and had either arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The exclusion criteria included patients with periprosthetic or post-surgical infections, patients who had atypical infections, and studies that did not report re-operation rate. Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (ROBINS-I) was used.

RESULTS

Nine studies (retrospective cohort studies) were included that involved 5,643 patients (5,645 shoulders). Mean age ranged from 55.6 to 75.5 years, and follow-up time ranged from 1-41 months. Mean duration of symptoms prior to presentation ranged from 8.3-23.3 days. Metanalysis observed a higher re-operation rate for reinfection at any time point following initial arthroscopy in comparison to arthrotomy, odds ratio 2.61 (95% confidence interval 1.04, 6.56). There was marked heterogeneity (I2 = 78.8%) among studies including surgical techniques and missing data.

CONCLUSION

This metanalysis observed a higher reoperation rate in arthroscopy in comparison to arthrotomy for the treatment of native shoulder septic arthritis in adults. The quality of the included evidence is low and the heterogeneity among included studies is marked. Higher quality evidence is still needed that address limitations of previous studies.

Early postoperative laboratory parameters are predictive of initial treatment failure in acute septic arthritis of the knee and shoulder joint

Septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency potentially causing irreversible joint damage. However, the predictive value of potential risk factors such as early postoperative laboratory parameters remains uncertain. We investigated risk factors for initial surgical treatment failure using data from 249 patients (194 knees, 55 shoulders) treated for acute septic arthritis between 2003 and 2018. Necessity for further surgical intervention was defined as primary outcome. Demographic data, medical history, initial and postoperative laboratory parameters, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Kellgren and Lawrence classification were collected. Two scoring systems were developed as tools for failure risk estimation after initial surgical irrigation and debridement. More than one intervention was necessary in 26.1% of cases. Treatment failure occurred significantly more often for those with longer symptom duration (p = 0.003), higher CCI grades (p = 0.027), Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV (p = 0.013), shoulder arthroscopy (p = 0.010), positive bacterial culture results (p < 0.001), slow postoperative CRP decline until day three (p = 0.032) and five (p = 0.015), reduced WBC-decline (p = 0.008), and lower hemoglobin (p < 0.001). Scores for third and fifth postoperative day achieved AUCs of 0.80 and 0.85, respectively. This study identified risk factors for treatment failure in patients with septic arthritis, suggesting that early postoperative laboratory parameters can guide further treatment.

Interposition Arthroplasty for Chronic Proximal Humerus Osteomyelitis: A Case Report

CASE

Two years after a right shoulder arthroscopic procedure, a 49-year-old woman presented with significant dysfunction and pain to our orthopaedic department. Laboratory and imaging evaluation demonstrated chronic glenohumeral osteomyelitis with irreparable damage to the humeral articular surface. A 2-stage soft-tissue shoulder interposition arthroplasty was performed to rebalance the joint. Long-term follow-up revealed functional results with pain control and no reinfection.

CONCLUSION

For patients at high risk of reinfection or unable to undergo prosthetic joint implantation, this approach may be considered a functional alternative to salvage procedures.

Joint aspiration and serum markers - do they matter in the diagnosis of native shoulder sepsis? A systematic review

Background

Septic arthritis of the native shoulder is traditionally diagnosed with the same strategies as knee or hip septic arthritis. However, septic arthritis of the shoulder is frequently a missed or delayed diagnosis. Reliance on aspiration and serum markers has been called into question recently. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review investigating the value of joint aspiration and serum markers in the diagnosis of native shoulder joint sepsis.

Methods

PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were used in the systematic literature search from January 1, 1960, through January 23, 2021. The primary outcome was to report on the synovial white cell count of patients with native shoulder sepsis. Descriptive statistics using percentages, means, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were used to summarize the results.

Results

Thirty-one studies, including 25 case series, one case-control, and five cohort studies with a total of 7434 native shoulder joints, were included. There was no standardized approach to diagnosing septic arthritis of the shoulder. Only 10 studies (32%) reported on synovial white cell count with the majority yielding aspiration counts greater than 50,000 cells/mm³, although one study was as low as 30,000 cells/mm³.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of native shoulder joint sepsis lacks uniformity. Methods used to evaluate shoulder sepsis are heterogeneous and may lead to delays or misdiagnosis with devastating sequelae. Synovial white cell count is underutilized and may also present with a lower value than expected, which is likely related to the time interval between symptom onset and diagnosis.

Factors affecting the occurrence of osseous lesions in septic shoulder arthritis and the recurrence rate after arthroscopic surgery

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of osseous lesions and the recurrence rate after arthroscopic surgery in shoulder septic arthritis patients and evaluate the influencing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for septic arthritis of the shoulder between January 2012 and September 2019. The average age of the patients was 65.57 ± 14.2 years, and 56.8% were female patients. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months (average, 32.8 ± 14.2 months; range, 12-72 months). We assessed variables including sex, age, underlying diseases, duration from symptom onset to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), duration from symptom onset to surgery, radiologic results (radiography and MRI), history of injection therapy, and postoperative infection. The incidence of osseous lesions and the recurrence rate were calculated according to independent variables. In addition, multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors for osseous lesions and recurrent infection after adjustment for other variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients had an osseous lesion on MRI, and 12 patients had evidence of bone erosion on radiographs. In univariate analyses, significant (P < .05) risk factors for the presence of osseous lesions were female sex, lower C-reactive protein level, and longer duration from symptom onset to MRI. The overall infection recurrence rate was 22.7% (10 of 44 patients). Culture results and the duration from symptom onset to surgery were significant risk factors for recurrent infection (P < .05). As the duration from symptom onset to MRI increased by 1 day, the probability of osseous lesions increased 1.31-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.08- to 1.59-fold; P = .007), and this probability was significantly higher after correction for other risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce the severity of septic shoulder infection, timely diagnosis and treatment are essential. Even if osseous lesions are present, good results can be obtained if meticulous débridement is performed through arthroscopic surgery. However, functional and radiologic long-term follow-up studies are needed in patients with osseous lesions.

[Management of joint empyema]

Joint empyema, also known as septic arthritis, is a severe disease associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Failing to initiate immediate treatment can result in irreversible joint destruction within a short time. The knee joint is most frequently involved, followed by the shoulder and hip joints. Small joints are rarely affected. Typical risk factors include immunosuppression, renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus and previous joint interventions. An early targeted diagnostic work-up and initiation of therapeutic steps is crucial to avoid irreversible joint destruction. Joint aspiration for diagnostic purposes is essential and should be performed immediately when a septic arthritis is suspected. An important differential diagnosis is metabolic arthritis (gout and chondrocalcinosis), which typically presents in a similar way. A differentiation from septic arthritis is important as metabolic arthritis requires a completely different treatment. After confirming the diagnosis, treatment consisting of a surgical procedure combined with antibiotics is initiated. In most cases an arthroscopic intervention is sufficient. In severe cases the arthroscopy needs to be repeated. An arthrotomy must be carried out only rarely. A pre-emptive antibiotic treatment is initially administered and is later adjusted according to the resistogram. This article gives an overview on the pathophysiology, diagnostics and general management of joint empyema.

Bilateral glenohumeral septic arthritis secondary to mastitis with subsequent avascular necrosis: A case report

Introduction and importance

Septic arthritis is an orthopaedic emergency. Only 3% of septic arthritis patients present with glenohumeral involvement. Polyarticular disease with shoulder involvement constitutes 1% of this group. There is currently no documented case of bilateral glenohumeral septic arthritis with avascular necrosis secondary to mastitis.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 38-year-old African woman with bilateral glenohumeral septic arthritis after management for mastitis of the left breast. She had left, then right shoulder pain, fever, and reduced range of motion, with multiple arthroscopic washouts and antibiotic therapy instituted at various hospitals by various specialists, leading to the resolution of active infection. The patient developed bilateral humeral head avascular necrosis with complete collapse as evidenced on plain radiography 4 months later, and underwent hemiarthroplasty of the right shoulder. Biopsy at operation showed no active bone infection, and inflammatory markers were not elevated. She had reduced discomfort for the following 2 years but developed increasing pain on lifting and reduced range of motion. The moderate symptoms in her left shoulder managed non-operatively had remained unchanged. There were no elevated inflammatory markers 2-years post arthroplasty.

Clinical discussion

This case presents an uncommon scenario of bilateral septic arthritis secondary to mastitis, with rapid progression to avascular necrosis in an individual with no classical risk factors for avascular necrosis, despite appropriate antibiotic treatment and surgical interventions. Advanced collapse necessitated hemiarthroplasty of the dominant right side.

Conclusion

This case highlights the need for close radiographic follow-up in atypical presentations of septic arthritis and the dilemmas in managing advanced bilateral avascular necrosis with arthroplasty in a young patient.

•

Septic arthritis is an orthopaedic emergency.

•

Mortality rates for septic arthritis range from 4 to 42% in monoarticular disease and up to 50% in polyarticular involvement.

•

Only 3% of septic arthritis cases are glenohumeral, with 1% being polyarticular.

•

Humeral head avascular necrosis secondary to septic arthritis is rare.

Factors affecting the outcome of septic arthritis of the shoulder joint with arthroscopic management

BACKGROUND

Good results have been reported with arthroscopic therapy of septic arthritis of the shoulder; however, few studies have focused on the risk factors for failure of arthroscopic surgery. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors affecting the recurrence or death post-surgery in cases of septic arthritis of the shoulder.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the records of patients who underwent surgical treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder between 2009 and 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on complete recovery, recurrence, or death after a single arthroscopic surgery: the eradicated group and the recurred/death group. To identify risk factors for the failure of arthroscopic surgery for septic arthritis of the shoulder, the following parameters were considered: age, sex, presentation of a rotator cuff tear, the arthroscopic staging of the infection, diabetes mellitus, the causative organism, preoperative white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein level in blood. We compared two groups with respect to the presence of potential risk factors.

RESULTS

This study included 22 patients with a mean age of 67.9 years. Septic arthritis of the shoulder was eradicated completely with a single arthroscopic surgery in 17 patients (77.3%). However, failure of the surgery resulting in recurrence or death was observed in 5 patients (22.7%). No significant differences were observed in other parameters between the two groups except for the causative organism. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was found in 1 patient (5.9%) in the eradicated group. On the other hand, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was found in 3 patients (60%) in the recurred/death group (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder are effectively treated with a single arthroscopic surgery. This study suggests that Methicillin-resistant S. aureus as the causative organism may be the most important prognostic factor in these cases.

Bilateral shoulder septic arthritis due to suspected bacterial endocarditis: A case report

•

Septic arthritis of the shoulder is rare but potentially devastating. Bilateral shoulder septic arthritis is even more rare of a diagnosis.

•

Patients can often present with unimpressive physical examination findings, so it is of utmost importance to keep septic arthritis as a differential diagnosis.

•

It is paramount that patients be promptly treated with surgical intervention and the appropriate antibiotic therapy for preservation of life and limb, regardless of the chronicity or severity of the septic joint.

Introduction

Septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency that requires rapid diagnosis and treatment. It is typically caused by occult bacteremia which allows bacteria to seed the joint or local invasion of a soft tissue infection. Most cases of septic arthritis are caused by gram-positive bacteria, with the most common culprit being Staphylococcus Aureus. The reason septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency is because of rapid destruction to cartilage. The mechanism of injury to cartilage is two-fold: bacterial enzymes are directly toxic to joint cartilage, and buildup of exudate can tamponade blood flow and cause anoxic injury. Typically, the knee is the most commonly involved joint. This is followed by the hip, ankle, elbow, wrist, and shoulder in descending order of occurrence. Polyarticular disease makes up a small percentage of these cases and if present, it is usually asymmetric and will involve at least one knee joint.

Presentation of case

Bilateral joint septic arthritis is relatively rare. We present an uncommon case of atraumatic bilateral septic shoulders in an elderly man with a history of heart disease and insidious bilateral shoulder pain after golfing 18 holes. This presentation is unique not only in its rarity but also in its impact on our understanding of septic arthritis in the setting of medical comorbidities and a relatively unimpressive presentation. With a recent golfing day just prior to presentation, differential diagnoses other than septic arthritis included deltoid/rotator cuff muscle strain, acute on chronic rotator cuff tendinosis, acute on chronic rotator cuff tearing, acute flare up of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or crystalline arthropathy. With elevated inflammatory markers and an equivocal physical examination, our patient underwent advanced imaging via MRI and subsequent bilateral glenohumeral joint diagnostic aspirations that were consistent with septic arthritis due to his complaining of contralateral shoulder pain shortly after his admission. Immediately after said diagnosis was made, the patient was taken back for emergent bilateral open irrigation and debridement, as septic arthritis is an orthopedic emergency, and went on to recover appropriately on culture-directed intravenous antibiotic therapy.

Discussion/conclusion

This case report is impactful with regard to clinical practice for multiple reasons. First and foremost it is a cautionary tale for all clinicians with regard to the level of suspicion one must have for polyarticular septic arthritis in the setting of the multiply painful patient. Second, it demonstrates the utility of advanced imaging in the equivocal patient. Lastly, it underscores the importance of prompt diagnosis and treatment, validating the existing algorithm for septic arthritis.

Post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy: modern diagnostic and therapeutic concepts

PURPOSE

Septic arthritis is a significant complication following arthroscopic surgery, with an estimated overall incidence of less than 1%. Despite the low incidence, an appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathway is required to avoid serious long-term consequences, eradicate the infection, and ensure good treatment outcomes. The aim of this current review article is to summarize evidence-based literature regarding diagnostic and therapeutic options of post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy.

METHODS

Through a literature review, up-to-date treatment algorithms and therapies have been identified. Additionally, a supportive new algorithm is proposed for diagnosis and treatment of suspected septic arthritis following arthroscopic intervention.

RESULTS

A major challenge in diagnostics is the differentiation of the post-operative status between a non-infected hyperinflammatory joint versus septic arthritis, due to clinical symptoms, (e.g., rubor, calor, or tumor) can appear identical. Therefore, joint puncture for microbiological evaluation, especially for fast leukocyte cell-count diagnostics, is advocated. A cell count of more than 20.000 leukocyte/µl with more than 70% of polymorphonuclear cells is the generally accepted threshold for septic arthritis.

CONCLUSION

The therapy is based on arthroscopic or open surgical debridement for synovectomy and irrigation of the joint, in combination with an adequate antibiotic therapy for 6-12 weeks. Removal of indwelling hardware, such as interference screws for ACL repair or anchors for rotator cuff repair, is recommended in chronic cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical Results after Arthroscopic Treatment of Septic Shoulder with Proximal Bone Involvement

BACKGROUND

If osteomyelitis is confined to the proximal humerus, arthroscopic debridement with multiple punctures at the infected bone might be sufficient to eradicate the septic shoulder with bone involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2017, 15 patients received arthroscopic debridement with multiple punctures. We included patients with septic shoulder arthritis with proximal bone involvement and excluded patients with glenohumeral joint destruction or extension of bone involvement to the diaphysis of the humerus. We performed multiple punctures for drainage of proximal humerus after complete arthroscopic debridement of septic soft tissue. Infection laboratory studies and postoperative magnetic resonance image were evaluated. For clinical outcome measurements, range of motion, pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale, American shoulder elbow surgeon scores, constant scores, and simple shoulder test were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 11 males and 4 females with a mean age of 53 years (range 28-73 years). Mean follow-up was 32 months (range 12-115 months). There was no reinfection case. The postoperative C-reactive protein levels were normalized in all. The postoperative magnetic resonance image showed no bony involvement of the proximal humerus in all patients except one patient. The clinical scores and range of motion were significantly improved postoperatively. Six patients underwent secondary surgery for rotator cuff tear at a mean time period of 25 months (range 4-104 months) from the index period.

CONCLUSION

Septic shoulder with proximal bone involvement can be successfully treated with arthroscopic debridement with multiple punctures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, treatment study.

Risk factors for failure of eradicating infection in a single arthroscopic surgical procedure for septic arthritis of the adult native shoulder with a focus on the volume of irrigation

BACKGROUND

Septic arthritis of a native joint is relatively rare but is still a challenging and important orthopedic emergency. Most previous reports have focused on the clinical outcomes rather than the risk factors for failure in arthroscopic surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with septic monoarthritis of the shoulder who underwent arthroscopic irrigation and débridement between January 2007 and January 2019. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to recurrence after a single arthroscopic surgical procedure: eradicated group or recurred group. To identify risk factors affecting the recurrence of septic arthritis of the shoulder after arthroscopic surgery, the following parameters were considered: age; sex; involved side; presentation of rotator cuff tear; volume of irrigation; bacterial organism involved; preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, and white blood cell count in blood and joint fluid; diabetes mellitus; and hypertension. We compared the eradicated and recurred groups regarding the presence of potential risk factors.

RESULTS

The study included 97 patients with a mean age of 61 years. Septic arthritis of the shoulder was eradicated completely with a single arthroscopic surgical procedure in 85 patients. However, a second arthroscopic surgical procedure was necessary in 12 patients (12.4%) because of infection recurrence. No significant differences were found between groups except in the volume of irrigation (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with septic arthritis (87.6%) of native shoulders were effectively treated with a single arthroscopic irrigation and débridement. The amount of irrigation may be the most important factor for preventing the need for additional surgical management.

Treatment of acute shoulder infection: can osseous lesion be a rudder in guideline for determining the method of débridement?

BACKGROUND

There is no standard to determine the most appropriate method of operation for the treatment of acute septic arthritis of the shoulder joint.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients who underwent arthroscopic or open débridement for acute shoulder infection between 2001 and 2015. Arthroscopic débridement was performed in 27 patients, and open débridement in 30 patients. According to the presence of bone erosion and/or marginal erosion of cartilage of the humeral head on plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, the cases were classified into 3 groups (group 1, n = 23, without erosions in x-ray and MRI; group 2, n = 21, erosions seen in MRI but not in x-ray; and group 3, n = 13, with erosions seen in both x-ray and MRI).

RESULTS

The arthroscopic group had a reinfection rate of 55.6% (15/27), and the open group had a reinfection rate of 16.7% (5/30). The reinfection rates in the arthroscopic and the open groups were 10% (1/10) and 15.4% (2/13) in group 1; 75% (9/12) and 11.1% (1/9) in group 2; and 100% (5/5) and 25% (2/8) in group 3, respectively. At the last follow-up, the mean University of California at Los Angeles score and the average time until normalization of white blood cell, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein in the open group showed superior results in the open group (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

When preoperative MRI showed bone and/or cartilage erosion of humeral head, the reinfection rate after arthroscopic débridement was above 75%. Therefore, if preoperative MRI showed erosions, open débridement is more likely to be appropriate than arthroscopic débridement.

Advanced septic arthritis of the shoulder treated by a two-stage arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The usual treatment of septic shoulder arthritis consists of arthroscopic or open lavage and debridement. However, in patients with advanced osteoarthritic changes and/or massive rotator cuff tendon tears, infection eradication can be challenging to achieve and the functional outcome is often not satisfying even after successful infection eradication. In such cases a two-stage approach with initial resection of the native infected articular surfaces, implantation of a cement spacer before final treatment with a total shoulder arthroplasty in a second stage is gaining popularity in recent years with the data in literature however being still limited.

AIM

To evaluate the results of a short interval two-stage arthroplasty approach for septic arthritis with concomitant advanced degenerative changes of the shoulder joint.

METHODS

We retrospectively included five consecutive patients over a five-year period and evaluated the therapeutic management and the clinical outcome assessed by disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and subjective shoulder value (SSV). All procedures were performed through a deltopectoral approach and consisted in a debridement and synovectomy, articular surface resection and insertion of a custom made antibiotic enriched cement spacer. Shoulder arthroplasty was performed in a second stage.

RESULTS

Mean age was 61 years (range, 47-70 years). Four patients had previous surgeries ahead of the septic arthritis. All patients had a surgical debridement ahead of the index procedure. Mean follow-up was 13 mo (range, 6-24 mo). Persistent microbiological infection was confirmed in all five cases at the time of the first stage of the procedure. The shoulder arthroplasties were performed 6 to 12 wk after insertion of the antibiotic-loaded spacer. There were two hemi and three reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Infection was successfully eradicated in all patients. The clinical outcome was satisfactory with a mean DASH score and SSV of 18.4 points and 70% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Short interval two-stage approach for septic shoulder arthritis is an effective treatment option. It should nonetheless be reserved for selected patients with advanced disease in which lavage and debridement have failed.

Shoulder Joint Infections with Negative Culture Results: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes

Background

The incidence of septic arthritis of the shoulder joint is increasing as the population ages. The prevalence of shoulder infection is also increasing because of the growing use of arthroscopy and expansion of procedures in the shoulder. However, cultures do not always identify all microorganisms, even in symptomatic patients. The incidence of negative cultures ranges from 0% to 25%. Few studies have reported clinical features and treatment outcomes of culture-negative shoulder infections. This cohort study addresses culture-negative shoulder joint infections in nonarthroplasty patients. This study aimed to compare clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with culture-negative results to those with culture-positive results. Our hypothesis was that culture-negative infections would have more favorable outcomes than culture-positive infections.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of 36 patients (17 culture-negative and 19 culture-positive) with shoulder infections between June 2004 and March 2015. The minimum follow-up duration was 1.2 years (mean, 5 ± 3.8 years; range, 1.2-11 years). We assessed preoperative demographic data and characteristics, laboratory markers, imaging and functional scores, intraoperative findings, and postoperative findings of both groups.

Results

Culture-negative patients (17/36, 47.2%) had a significantly lower occurrence of repeated surgical debridement (culture-negative vs. culture-positive: 1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 2.4 ± 1.7, p = 0.002) without osteomyelitis. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the presence of osteomyelitis [odds ratio (OR) = 9.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-91.8, p=0.04)] and the number of surgical debridements (OR = 5.3, 95% CI: 1.3-21.6, p=0.02) were significantly associated with culture-positive infections.

Conclusions

Culture-negative infections without osteomyelitis are less severe than culture-positive infections. Culture-negative infections can be controlled more easily and are not necessarily a negative prognostic factor for shoulder joint infections.

Impact of setting up a bone and joint infection referral center on arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the knee and shoulder: Retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Referral Centers for Bone and Joint Infection (BJI) were set up to optimize BJI management thanks to multidisciplinary teamwork. The main aim of the present study was to assess the impact of setting up the Western France Bone and Joint Infection Referral Center on arthroscopic treatment of septic arthritis of the shoulder and knee. The secondary aim was to identify other risk factors for failure of this treatment. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference between the "success group" and the "failure group".

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 52 patients treated for septic arthritis between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013 by arthroscopic joint lavage associated to at least 4 weeks' antibiotic therapy. Exclusion criteria comprised: retrospective diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis after negative bacteriological analysis, early cessation of antibiotic treatment, and follow-up less than 4 weeks. Failure was defined as non-healing after first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was date of treatment compared to the launch date of the Center in the first quarter of 2010. The influence of pre- and intraoperative criteria related to patient, treatment and microorganism was assessed.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 17 patients (32.9%) showed failure of first-line treatment and 5 (9.6%) were non-healed at end of treatment, whatever the re-intervention. The failure rate significantly decreased after setting up the Center, from 42.9% to 11.8% (p=0.03). In the failure group, 70.6% of patients showed immunosuppression, versus 37.2% in the success group (p=0.01). Neither time to surgery (p=1), type of microorganism, or performance of antiseptic lavage (p=0.25) or synovectomy (p=0.62) influenced outcome.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary management of septic arthritis improved treatment success.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective comparative study.

Septic arthritis of the shoulder and elbow: one decade of epidemiological analysis at a tertiary referral hospital

Objective

To describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder or elbow and to evaluate prognostic factors for complications during treatment.

Methods

A retrospective case series was studied with patients treated between 2004 and 2014. The patients’ clinical and epidemiological characteristics were collected. The clinical and orthopedic complications were identified and possible prognostic factors were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were analyzed, 17 with septic arthritis of the shoulder and ten of the elbow. Median age was 46 years (IQR, 24.5; 61). Previous joint disease was observed in nine patients (33%). At least one clinical comorbidity was observed in 23 patients (85%). Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 14 cases (52%). Fourteen patients (52%) had at least one clinical complication and five patients died (19%). Nine patients (33%) had some type of orthopedic complication. The time between onset of symptoms and surgical treatment was longer in patients with orthopedic complications (p = 0.020). Regarding the development of clinical complications, leukocytosis on hospital admission time (p = 0.021) and the presence of clinical morbidities (p = 0.041) were predictive factors.

Conclusions

Septic arthritis of the shoulder and elbow primarily affects individuals who are immunocompromised and/or have clinical comorbidities. S. aureus is the most common pathogen in Brazil. Leukocytosis at hospital admission and the presence of clinical comorbidities are factors associated with the presence of clinical complications. Longer time between onset of symptoms and surgical treatment was correlated with orthopedic complications.

Arthroscopic Management of Septic Arthritis of the Native Shoulder: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To investigate arthroscopic management of native shoulder joint septic arthritis-specifically, indications, patient outcomes, and complications.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were used to search the literature, and data abstraction was performed independently and in duplicate. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist guided reporting and data abstraction. The quality of all included studies was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. The results are presented in a narrative summary fashion using descriptive statistics including means, proportions, ranges, κ values, and intraclass correlation coefficient values.

RESULTS

Overall, 27 studies (19 case reports and 8 case series) were identified, including 115 patients (121 shoulders). The mean follow-up period was 29.1 months (range, 1-199 months). The indications for shoulder arthroscopy owing to infection included pain; limited range of motion; swelling, erythema, and tenderness; fever; elevated leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and/or C-reactive protein level; synovial aspirate findings; and/or imaging findings. Overall, 46 patients (40%) achieved infection eradication and functional improvement after a single arthroscopic procedure. However, 43 patients (37%) had ongoing symptoms or complications, including 32 (30%) who required revision arthroscopic procedures, 7 (6%) who underwent open arthrotomy for septic arthritis management, 2 (2%) in whom avascular necrosis of the humeral head developed, 1 (1%) in whom adhesive capsulitis developed, and 1 (1%) in whom an irregular profile of the humeral epiphysis developed on plain radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic management of native shoulder septic arthritis can yield alleviation of pain and a return to full range of motion, daily activities, and sports. However, there is a high reoperation rate, which may correlate with poor patient prognostic factors. This systematic review did not show the superiority of either arthroscopic surgery or open arthrotomy for the management of shoulder septic arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

The use of continuous negative pressure after open debridement for septic arthritis of the shoulder

AIMS

The treatment of septic arthritis of the shoulder is challenging. The infection frequently recurs and the clinical outcome can be very poor. We aimed to review the outcomes following the use of continuous negative pressure after open debridement with a large diameter drain in patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 68 consecutive patients with septic arthritis of the shoulder underwent arthrotomy, irrigation and debridement. A small diameter suction drain was placed in the glenohumeral joint and a large diameter drain was placed in the subacromial space with continuous negative pressure of 15 cm H2O. All patients received a standardised protocol of antibiotics for a mean of 5.1 weeks (two to 11.1).

RESULTS

Negative pressure was maintained for a mean of 24 days (14 to 32). A total of 67 patients (98.5%) were cured without further treatment being required. At a mean follow-up of 14 months (three to 72), the mean forward flexion was 123° (80° to 140°) and the mean external rotation was 28°(10° to 40°) in those with a rotator cuff tear, and 125° (85° to 145°) and 35° (15° to 45°) in those without a rotator cuff tear.

CONCLUSION

Continuous negative pressure, following open arthrotomy, irrigation and debridement, was effective in treating septic arthritis of the shoulder. The rate of recurrence was significantly lower than with conventional treatment involving arthroscopic or open debridement reported in the literature. Functional outcomes, even in patients with rotator cuff tears, were excellent.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Continuous negative pressure is effective in treating septic arthritis of the shoulder. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:660-5.

Prognostic Factors Affecting the Clinical Outcome of Septic Arthritis of the Shoulder

Background: The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome of septic arthritis of the shoulder.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 34 shoulders from 32 patients, two of which had bilateral involvement. Arthroscopic (22 shoulders) or open surgery (12 shoulders) was performed by a single surgeon. The mean follow-up period was 32.4 ± 17.0 months. Clinical outcomes according to the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) were assessed at the final follow-up period. Various factors were included for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean UCLA, ASES scores, and SSV were 28.9 ± 7.2, 81.3 ± 21.0, 79.7 ± 2.5%, respectively. Positive culture was observed in only 13 shoulders (38.2%) and the most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (seven shoulders). Five shoulders (14.7%) required two or three operations. Age and comorbidity were negatively correlated with the UCLA, ASES score, and/or SSV (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between clinical outcome and various parameters, including gender, location of lesion, history of previous steroid injection, interval between onset of symptoms and surgical intervention, bacterial organisms, operative method, and presence of rotator cuff tear and reoperation (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Both arthroscopic and open surgery for septic shoulders showed satisfactory clinical outcomes. Old age and comorbidity were poor prognostic factors of clinical outcomes after treatment.

Septic arthritis and arthropathy of the rotator cuff: remember this association

OBJECTIVE

To describe occurrences of septic glenohumeral arthritis among patients with arthropathy of the rotator cuff, and to highlight the importance of correct diagnosis and surgical procedures.

METHODOLOGY

Eight surgical drains were installed in seven patients with glenohumeral pyoarthritis. All the patients presented arthropathy of the rotator cuff (four males and three females). Six patients presented pyoarthritis in the dominant shoulder. The age range was from 53 to 93 years (mean: 74 years). The mean duration of the symptoms before the surgical lavage was six weeks. Six patients underwent treatment consisting of a combination of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement, and one patient was treated by means of open arthrotomy. All the patients received systemic antibiotic therapy in accordance with their bacterial sensitivity.

RESULTS

All seven patients achieved satisfactory results, taking into consideration especially the improvement of pain and the patients' satisfaction. The functional assessment was performed using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale. Only one patient needed to go through another arthroscopic procedure. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from four cultures and Escherichia coli from one culture. There were two situations in which the patients used empirical antibiotic therapy and the cultures showed negative results. Among the associated procedures, tenotomy of the biceps was performed in four cases, resection of the lateral third of the clavicle due to osteomyelitis in one case and arthrotomy of the knee in one case.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment was effective in the cases of arthritis associated with arthropathy of the rotator cuff. In patients with arthropathy of the rotator cuff and subclinically altered laboratory signs, the possibility of pyoarthritis should always be suspected.

Is there sufficient evidence to support intervention to manage shoulder arthritis?

BACKGROUND

We explore the nature, extent and validity of research studies concerning the management of shoulder arthritis to identify whether current management recommendations are adequate.

METHODS

A full electronic search for relevant studies published between 2002 and 2012 was performed. The search focused on level 1 and level 2 studies. Full texts of selected articles were retrieved and assessed for quality against validated criteria.

RESULTS

Four hundred and eleven studies were identified on the initial search and screened. Sixteen studies were selected for inclusion in the review. The studies identified were unable to provide a clear indication of best intervention for shoulder arthritis. The inclusion of a range of shoulder pathologies in some studies and the diversity in outcome measures used made it difficult for systematic reviews to effectively pool data. Better outcomes have been shown with total shoulder replacement over hemiarthroplasty for shoulder osteoarthritis; however, primary studies were often of limited quality. Sparse evidence is available for all other interventions, regardless of whether operative or non-operative.

CONCLUSIONS

The present review highlights the need for standardization of outcome assessment following treatment of shoulder arthritis. More rigorous and robust primary studies are needed to guide clinical practice on the best interventions for arthritis of the shoulder.

Bilateral shoulder septic arthritis in a fit and well 47-year-old man

Bilateral septic arthritis of the shoulder is uncommon in the immunocompetent patient with no previous risk factors for joint infection, and is thus easily missed. Septic arthritis is associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and management is the key to a favourable outcome; septic arthritis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in the unwell patient presenting with shoulder pain and reduced range of joint movement. We present a case of a 47-year-old previously fit and well man with bilateral shoulder septic arthritis. We will also review the current literature on management and long-term outcomes of patients with septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint.

Destructive septic arthritis of shoulder in adults

BACKGROUND

Late sequelae of septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint are very rare and represent a potentially devastating condition that can result in irreversible changes at the level of joint and surrounding soft tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2010, ten patients were treated at our institution for late sequelae of septic arthritis of the shoulder. There were eight men and two women with a mean age of 67.9 years (range 62-74 years). Eight of ten patients had previously received three or more intra-articular or subacromial injections. Surgical treatment consisted of open joint debridement, humeral head resection and implantation of an antibiotic spacer followed by a 6-8-week course of intravenous antibiotics.

RESULTS

White blood cell count, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate normalized between 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively in all patients. No recurrent infection was observed in any patient. Postoperatively, the mean Constant score was 37 (range 28-46) and mean DASH score was 54 (range 40-69), demonstrating a very limited function in these patients. There was a trend toward improved outcome scores in patients who underwent early surgical debridement. Five patients underwent delayed reconstruction with a reverse shoulder prosthesis, and at minimum 1-year follow-up, the mean Constant score was 56 (range 47-69) and mean DASH score was 33 (31-38).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic spacers are able to deliver antibiotics locally to the infected tissue while reducing the dead space and stabilizing the glenohumeral joint. An early, aggressive management of the infection is essential to maximize clinical outcomes and avoid either significant destruction or ankylosis of the shoulder joint.

Magnetic resonance imaging of shoulder arthropathies

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating shoulder arthropathies is evolving. This article reviews 4 of the major arthropathies: septic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) deposition disease, and hydroxyapatite disease (HAD), with special attention to their magnetic resonance imaging features. Comfort with identifying these entities allows appropriate and prompt treatment, which is critical for joint preservation in the case of infection, for maximal therapeutic efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in the case of rheumatoid arthritis, and for expediting symptomatic relief in the cases of CPPD deposition disease and HAD.

Resection arthroplasty of the shoulder as a salvage procedure for deep shoulder infection: does the use of a cement spacer improve outcome?

HYPOTHESIS

Resection arthroplasty can be performed for recalcitrant shoulder infection. It is unclear whether a spacer has any benefit. We hypothesized that spacers would increase infection control and improve clinical results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were evaluated retrospectively at a mean follow-up of 46.4 months: 11 patients did not receive a spacer (group A), and 10 patients did receive a spacer (group B). Patients were assessed clinically and with radiographs. Patients were scored using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Simple Shoulder Test, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand.

RESULTS

Infection was eradicated in 19 patients without additional surgery. Two patients had elevated C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate and were considered to have low-grade infections. Neither patient received a spacer and had not been revised. Infectious control was not significantly different between group A and group B (P = .48). Fourteen patients found the result good or acceptable. The VAS decreased from 6.5 to 2.6. The CMS increased significantly from 17.8 to 40.4. Active abduction averaged 78.1° and active flexion averaged 85.5°. External rotation was 21.0°.

DISCUSSION

No significant difference was shown between group A and group B. Preservation of the tuberosities was identified as a prognosticator for a good result. Unacceptable pain resulted in 5 patients with a spacer undergoing delayed reimplantation of a prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

Resection arthroplasty can be offered to patients with long-standing deep shoulder infection that was unresponsive to previous surgical treatment. Control of infection did not differ significantly between the groups. No improvement in outcome was demonstrated with the use of cement spacers.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure--midterm results

Our goal was to evaluate the objective and subjective midterm outcome after revision of a failed shoulder arthroplasty with a reverse design prosthesis. Twenty consecutive patients with 21 revisions of a primary shoulder arthroplasty using reverse shoulder prosthesis Delta III(®) were followed up postoperatively for a mean of 46 months including clinical and radiological examination. Complications were recorded and Constant score, DASH and SF36 were assessed. With the numbers given a significant reduction of pain was achieved from 8.7 to 3.0 (p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement of active flexion from 43° to 97° (p < 0.001) and active abduction from 44° to 90° (p < 0.001). However, at the same time, active external rotation with an adducted humerus decreased significantly from 26° to 12° (p = 0.012). The constant score improved significantly from 16.7 to 55.9 (p < 0.001). Sixteen patients (84%) rated their shoulder better or much better than before. In 43% an intraoperative and in 38% a postoperative complication occurred including two late stage infections which required prosthesis removal. Our results support the use of the reverse prosthesis as revision prosthesis. The reverse design helps to compensate functional deficits due to severe soft-tissue damage except active external rotation. Nevertheless, the revision is a technically demanding procedure reflected in a high rate of intraoperative complications. The rate of secondary infections of 10% remains a special concern.

Septic arthritis as a severe complication of elective arthroscopy:clinical management strategies

Infection of a peripheral joint following arthroscopic surgery presents with an incidence of approximately 0.42% an extremely rare entity. However, septic arthritis is a serious situation possibly leading to an irreparable joint damage. Especially at delayed diagnosis patients' safety can be endangered severely. Only few precise statements regarding diagnosis and therapy have been published so far. Besides an accurate analysis of the patient's anamnesis and the assessment of the C-reactive protein especially arthrocentesis is required for diagnostic workup. For early stage infections arthroscopic therapy is proven to be of value. In addition a calculated and consecutive germ-adjusted antibiotic therapy is essential. In case of persisting signs of infection the indication for re-arthroscopy or conversion to open revision has to be stated in time. The number of necessary revisions is dependent on the initial stage of infection. For pain therapy postoperative immobilization of the affected joint is occasionally essential, if otherwise possibly early mobilization of the joint should be performed.

[Infection after arthroscopy]

Infection of a peripheral joint following arthroscopic surgery is extremely rare, with an incidence of up to 0.42%. However, the consequences of delayed diagnosis can be dramatic. Besides taking an exact patient history, C-reactive protein determination and, especially, diagnostic arthrocentesis are required. For early-stage infections, arthroscopic therapy has been proven valuable. In addition, calculated and antibiogram-adjusted antibiotic therapy is essential. In the case of persisting signs of infection, re-arthroscopy should be considered quickly, with indications broad. The number of necessary revisions depends on the initial stage of infection. Postoperative immobilisation of the affected joint is occasionally essential for treating pain; otherwise, early mobilisation of the joint should be performed.