Body Contouring Surgery Improves Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bleeding Risk in Post-bariatric Abdominoplasties: A Large Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Post-bariatric abdominoplasty is a standard procedure to improve body contour and quality of life following massive weight loss. However, perioperative bleeding remains a concern, particularly in the context of thromboprophylaxis and pre-existing comorbidities. This study investigates the risk factors for bleeding, including hypertension and bariatric surgery type, in patients undergoing abdominoplasty post-bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Patient data were retrospectively collected from a tertiary centre in Italy. Patient demographics, comorbidities, bariatric surgery type, and thromboprophylaxis use were analysed. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses identified significant predictors of bleeding. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for bleeding outcomes based on bariatric surgery type and patient variables.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients who underwent abdominoplasty following bariatric surgery were included in the analysis. The cohort had a median age of 44 years, with 71% female (142/201). Hypertension was significantly associated with bleeding risk (β = 0.1, p = 0.047; RR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.02-6.01, p = 0.045). Among bariatric procedures, gastric banding conferred the highest bleeding risk compared to mini-gastric bypass (RR = 6.8, 95% CI: 2.09-21.8, p = 0.001). Sleeve gastrectomy also showed a higher bleeding risk than mini-gastric bypass (RR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.24-8.5, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Hypertension emerged as an independent risk factor for bleeding in post-bariatric abdominoplasty, increasing risk by more than twofold. Additionally, bariatric surgery type influenced outcomes, with gastric banding and sleeve gastrectomy associated with higher bleeding risk compared to mini-gastric bypass. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative optimisation and surgical planning to mitigate bleeding complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Multidisciplinary Care in Body Contouring: An Integrative Approach to Enhancing Outcomes

Body contouring procedures have become increasingly common to meet the growing demand for aesthetic surgery, particularly in the context of bariatrics. Massive weight loss (MWL) patients are complex and often require extensive management of comorbidities, malnutrition status, physical debilitation, and psychological sequelae. Patient optimization prior to body contouring surgery in addition to strict postoperative maintenance are crucial to achieve favorable and sustainable outcomes. Surgical candidates should be screened thoroughly, and in the MWL patient population specifically, multidisciplinary care is needed for proper evaluation and support. Notable specialists that routinely contribute in MWL and body contouring patient care include plastic surgeons, bariatric surgeons, primary care physicians, dieticians, endocrinologists, mental health providers, and physical therapists. This article details essential roles within the multidisciplinary approach to body contouring surgery and MWL patients and reviews critical pre-, intra-, and postoperative aspects of care.

Factors Affecting Patient Outcomes of Abdominoplasty After Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative complications in body contouring surgery have been linked to several factors, including body mass index, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and skin resection weight. Prior weight loss by surgical means is another predisposing factor for postoperative complications following body contouring. This study aims to examine these previously identified variables, and several others, in the context of a spectrum of abdominal body contouring techniques following bariatric surgery. Our goal is to highlight that current evidence supports the notion that the prior history of bariatric surgery does not significantly impact body contouring surgery's success and its associated complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients (N = 198) who underwent abdominal body contouring between January 2011 and January 2022 following bariatric surgery was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, medical history, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-four (32%) patients developed a postoperative complication. In the univariate analysis, patients who developed a postoperative complication were more likely to have a mental health disorder (63% vs 44%, P = 0.015) and to have undergone abdominal surgery other than panniculectomy ( P = 0.002). They also had significantly longer median operative time (160 minutes, σ = 68.9, vs 140 minutes, σ = 72.3, P = 0.037) and longer follow-up time (99 days, σ = 471.1 vs 23 days, σ = 430.5, P < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression model including diabetes, hypertension, abdominoplasty type, operative time, skin excision weight, and concurrent body contouring procedure, the only significant factor in complication rate was the type of abdominal body contouring. Specifically, the traditional (odds ratio: 2.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.25-5.93) and vertical abdominoplasty (odds ratio: 5.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 25.87) techniques were more likely to lead to complications compared with panniculectomy abdominoplasty, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously cited risk factors such as diabetes, body mass index, and skin resection weight did not increase the chance of complications. Panniculectomy appears to be a safer option for those with a history of bariatric surgery.

The Impact of Body Contouring Following Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Examination of Psychosocial and Medical Impairment

INTRODUCTION

Body contouring surgery (BCS) to remove loose skin is often desired following bariatric surgery. This study prospectively examined psychosocial and medical functioning based on BCS status after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

N=56 adults who sought a BCS consultation following bariatric surgery completed measures of impairment, depression, and medical (e.g., rashes, infections) and psychosocial concerns due to loose skin. Assessments were repeated at 1- and 3-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

Most did not undergo BCS due to insurance coverage denial/finances; n = 24 (42.9%) underwent BCS. The groups with and without BCS did not differ significantly in BMI, weight loss, impairment, or depression at any assessment; however, a significantly greater proportion of non-BCS patients reported several medical and psychosocial concerns due to loose skin relative to BCS patients at follow-up assessments. Greater loose skin concerns were associated significantly with greater impairment and depression at all assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Over half who sought BCS did not undergo BCS, mostly due to insurance/financial reasons. The BCS group had significantly fewer medical and psychosocial concerns related to loose skin at follow-ups. Greater loose skin concerns were associated with heightened levels of broad psychosocial impairments suggesting that loose skin and psychological concerns warrant greater clinical attention after bariatric surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Improving the Impact of BODY-Q Scores Through Minimal Important Differences in Body Contouring Surgery: An International Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The BODY-Q is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure for comprehensive assessment of treatment outcomes specific to patients undergoing body contouring surgery (BCS). However, for the BODY-Q to be meaningfully interpreted and used in clinical practice, minimal important difference (MID) scores are needed. A MID is defined as the smallest change in outcome measure score that patients perceive as important.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine BODY-Q MID estimates for patients undergoing BCS to enhance the interpretability of the BODY-Q.

METHODS

Data from an international, prospective cohort from Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Poland were included. Two distribution-based methods were used to estimate MID: 0.2 standard deviations of mean baseline scores and the mean standardized response change of BODY-Q scores from baseline to 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 12,554 assessments from 3237 participants (mean age 42.5 ± 9.3 years; BMI 28.9 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were included. Baseline MID scores ranged from 1 to 5 on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) scales and 3 to 6 on the appearance scales. The estimated MID scores from baseline to 3-year follow-up ranged from 4 to 5 for HRQL and from 4 to 8 on the appearance scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The BODY-Q MID estimates from before BCS to 3 years postoperatively ranged from 4 to 8 and are recommended for interpretation of patients' BODY-Q scores, evaluation of treatment effects of different BCS procedures, and calculation of sample size for future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Pregnancy After Panniculectomy Postbariatric Surgery: A Case Report

Panniculectomy and abdominoplasty are two forms of abdominal body contouring commonly performed. There are literature reports of healthcare providers citing abdominoplasty as a contraindication to future pregnancy due to potential risks to the patient and fetus. Panniculectomy, outside of the reduced risks from the lack of rectus muscle plication, would have similar effects on the patient and fetus in future pregnancies. Yet, abdominal contouring surgery is being performed in women of childbearing age with increasing frequency, meriting further research to explore the true safety profile of pregnancy after body contouring surgeries. Here, we present a case report of a woman who underwent two full-term vaginal deliveries after undergoing a panniculectomy due to massive weight loss from prior gastric bypass. While she had high utilization of healthcare services throughout her pregnancies, she experienced no significant adverse pregnancy outcomes. Our report is consistent with current literature, suggesting that prior panniculectomy should not be a contraindication to pregnancy.

Body Contouring Surgery After Bariatric Surgery Improves Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life and Satisfaction With Appearance: An International Longitudinal Cohort Study Using the BODY-Q

OBJECTIVE

To examine health-related quality of life (HRQL) and satisfaction with appearance in patients who have undergone bariatric surgery (BS) with or without subsequent body contouring surgery (BCS) in relation to the general population normative for the BODY-Q.

BACKGROUND

The long-term impact of BS with or without BCS has not been established using rigorously developed and validated patient-reported outcome measures. The BODY-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure developed to measure changes in HRQL and satisfaction with appearance in patients with BS and BCS.

METHODS

Prospective BODY-Q data were collected from 6 European countries (Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland, Germany, Italy, and Poland) from June 2015 to February 2022 in a cohort of patients who underwent BS. Mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze changes in HRQL and appearance over time between patients who did and did not receive BCS and to examine the impact of patient-level covariates on outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 24,604 assessments from 5620 patients. BS initially led to improved HRQL and appearance scores throughout the first postbariatric year, followed by a gradual decrease. Patients who underwent subsequent BCS after BS experienced a sustained improvement in HRQL and appearance or remained relatively stable for up to 10 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent BCS maintained an improvement in HRQL and satisfaction with appearance in contrast to patients who only underwent BS, who reported a decline in scores 1 to 2 years postoperatively. Our results emphasize the pivotal role that BCS plays in the completion of the weight loss trajectory.

Flowchart in Post-Bariatric Surgery: A Research for the Appropriate Type and Timing of Plasties Reshaping the Body

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a chronic disease with significant health implications. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for obesity-related conditions. However, the timing of post-bariatric body contouring surgery remains uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 1336 patients who underwent bariatric surgery. We analyzed weight trends and variations after different types of bariatric procedures. The Pittsburgh Index was used to evaluate body contouring outcomes.

RESULTS

The majority of patients were women, and sleeve gastrectomy was the most common procedure. Weight loss varied depending on the surgery type, with different outcomes for male and female patients. The Pittsburgh Index remained stable in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the timing of body contouring surgery should be tailored to the type of bariatric procedure performed. Abdominoplasty is recommended as a last procedure for sleeve gastrectomy patients, while gastric bypass patients are suitable candidates for early abdominoplasty. Biliopancreatic diversion patients should stabilize their weight before abdominoplasty. The Pittsburgh Index is a valuable tool for assessing the timing of post-bariatric plastic surgery. Further research is needed to optimize surgical planning and outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Do Small Scars Lead to Better Results? Analysis of Long-term Outcomes and Satisfaction of Patients Undergoing Anchor-line Abdominoplasty Following Massive Weight Loss

INTRODUCTION

Do smaller scars lead to higher patient satisfaction? The aim of this study is to analyze long-term satisfaction of patients who underwent abdominoplasty after massive weight loss.

METHODS

Patients inclusion criteria: no previous abdominal remodeling procedures, previous bariatric surgery followed by a weight loss of at least 30 kg, weight stability for at least one year, good understanding of the Italian language and standardized pre- and postoperative photographs. We divided the population in 2 groups based on the surgical procedure: group 1, conventional abdominoplasty, and group 2, anchor-line abdominoplasty. All patients presented scars in the epigastric and mesogastric region resulting from previous laparoscopic or laparotomic bariatric surgery and/or other laparoscopic or laparotomic procedures. At least 2 years after surgery, we administered the Italian version of the post-operative BODY-Q module and the SCAR-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

We enrolled 20 males and 69 females aged between 25 and 55 years, with a mean follow-up of 2 years. Analyzing the questionnaires, it resulted that patients undergoing anchor-line abdominoplasty were significantly more satisfied in the body perception of the result (p = 0.035) and in the satisfaction with abdomen domain (p = 0.0015) compared to the conventional abdominoplasty group. Scars assessment with the SCAR-Q did not show any significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite its long scars, the anchor-line pattern shows an overall higher satisfaction, due to the possibility of reducing the abdomen both cranio-caudally and circumferentially. These findings might be an important guide when approaching abdominoplasty in post-bariatric patients, debunking the myth "shorter is better".

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Emerging Role of Injectable Weight Loss Medications in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Obesity is a multifactorial disease that represents a substantial global health concern. As of 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that over 650 million adults were obese, and more than 1.9 billion were overweight. Surgical interventions or lifestyle changes are typically suggested to patients who experience comorbidities as a result of their weight; however, more recently, antidiabetic medications have been proposed, specifically sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). This is the first systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and future role of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs for weight loss in the world of aesthetic plastic surgery. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review and comprised data from 10,492 patients. All studies reported a decline in body weight following treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs, ranging from 1.5 to 5 kg. Although adverse events were reported in a large proportion of patients, primarily gastrointestinal manifestations, the literature reports that these were mild to moderate in severity and tended to subside following treatment adjustment. Future research is warranted to determine the ideal SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1RA for weight loss management, and additional randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of potential combination therapies with SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Weight Control following Body Contouring Surgery: Long-Term Assessment of Postbariatric and Nonbariatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Few reports of weight maintenance following body contouring (BC) surgery present weight measurements as percentage weight change, and most of these studies do not isolate BC to specific body areas. This study analyzed weight control in the trunk-based BC population and further compared BC outcomes in postbariatric and nonbariatric patients.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive postbariatric and nonbariatric patients who underwent trunk-based BC (abdominoplasty, panniculectomy, and circumferential lipectomy) from January 1, 2009, through July 31, 2020, at West Virginia University. A minimum 12-month follow-up was required for inclusion. With BC surgery date as the reference point, percentage total weight loss was assessed at 6-month intervals for 2 years following BC and every year thereafter. Change over time was compared between postbariatric and nonbariatric patients.

RESULTS

Within the 12-year timeframe, 121 patients meeting criteria underwent trunk-based BC. Average follow-up from date of BC was 42.9 months. Sixty patients (49.6%) had previously undergone bariatric surgery. From before BC to endpoint follow-up, postbariatric and nonbariatric patients experienced a 4.39% ± 10.93% and 0.25% ± 9.43% increase in weight from baseline, respectively ( P = 0.0273). Once nadir weight loss was attained, weight regain occurred through endpoint follow-up in both groups (11.81% in the postbariatric cohort and 7.56% in the nonbariatric BC cohort; P = 0.0106).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term weight regain is common following trunk-based BC operations-specifically, in postbariatric patients. Although this should not contend with the psychological benefit of removing this excess tissue, it is important to report results with ideal weight metrics to optimally assess outcomes in this population.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Quality of Life After Bariatric and Body Contouring Surgery in the Australian Public Health System

INTRODUCTION

The goals of bariatric surgery are weight loss, improved management of obesity-related diseases, and enhanced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study is to determine HRQoL among postoperative bariatric surgery patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of bariatric surgery and the role of body contouring surgery (BCS) when considering quality of life in low-volume centres in the Australian public health system.

METHODS

This cohort study compared patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2008 and 2018, to those awaiting surgery. An additional analysis was completed for patients who also underwent BCS. Patients completed the Short Form-36 quality of life (SF-36) survey. Linear regression was used to assess the differences in mean scores between cohorts for each of the SF-36 domains.

RESULTS

A total of 131 postoperative patients were identified, with a follow up rate of 68%. The mean follow up was 5.4 y. The mean scores for all domains of the SF-36 in the postoperative group were higher than the preoperative group (P ≤ 0.0001). A significant difference in scores persisted after controlling for patients' current BMI. When considering patients who underwent BCS (n = 24), there was a further global improvement in HRQoL in physical function (P = 0.0065), role limitation to physical health (P = 0.0026), pain (P = 0.0004), energy (P = 0.0023) and general health perceptions (P = 0.0023).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery followed by BCS may improve HRQoL for the patient when compared to bariatric surgery alone. We advocate for the use of bariatric surgery followed by BCS in low-volume centres in the Australian public health system.

Status of Body Contouring Following Metabolic Bariatric Surgery in a Tertiary Hospital of Greece—Still a Long Way to Go

Obesity is a disease rather than a state, and metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is its most effective treatment. Body contouring surgery (BCS) is an integral part of the continuum of care following MBS, provided that the body mass index (BMI) has stabilized for an adequate period. This study is an attempt to capture the current status of BCS following MBS in Greece, based on data from one of the country’s highest-volume hospitals. We recruited patients from the Bariatric and Plastic-Reconstructive Surgery registries who had undergone both MBS and BCS and invited them to answer a structured questionnaire with components on demographics, safety and effectiveness of previous operations, quality of life (QoL), body image, social activity, sexual activity, and doctor–patient communication. Twenty-four patients participated in the survey (response rate 88.1%). The mean BMI pre-MBS was 43.8 kg/m2 and that pre-BCS was 28.6 kg/m2. Based on the Bariatric sub-cohort, only 2.5% of post-bariatric patients underwent BCS. The mean interval between MBS and BCS was 2.9 years. The distribution of patients by MBS was as follows: sleeve gastrectomy 8 (33.3%), gastric band 7 (29.2%), gastric bypass 5 (20.8%), and gastric plication 2 (8.3%). The distribution of patients by BCS was as follows: abdominoplasty 23 (94.7%), breast contouring 8 (33.3%), thigh contouring 3 (12.5%), and arm contouring 5 (20.8%). Most positive components (70.6%) regarding QoL were appraised by >80% of the participants, indicating overall satisfaction after BCS. Conversely, only 12.5% of negative components were endorsed by >20% of patients. In conclusion, BCS has a low prevalence after MBS, although it is related to an improved quality of life and body image.

Post-Bariatric Plastic Surgery: Abdominoplasty, the State of the Art in Body Contouring

Due to the increased prevalence of obesity in the last decades, bariatric surgery has been on the rise in recent years. Bariatric surgery is a compelling option for weight loss in obese patients with severe obesity-related comorbidities or for whom lifestyle modifications have proven ineffective. Redundant skin following significant weight loss is a common occurrence affecting up to 96% of patients who undergo bariatric surgery, negatively impacting physical and psychosocial health and detracting from activities of daily living. Statistics of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons show that 46,577 body contouring procedures were performed after massive weight loss in the USA in a 2020 report. Abdominoplasty, a well-established cosmetic surgery procedure for improving body contour, is performed by removing excess skin and fat from the abdominal wall and thereby restoring musculofascial integrity and skin elasticity, resulting in a more ideal body shape and increasing quality of life. Although abdominoplasty is a safe procedure, it has been associated with a higher complication rate compared with other body-contouring procedures. Technologic advances over the past decade have been developed as non-invasive alternatives or adjunctive tools to surgery to enhance cosmetic results and minimize complications. New energy-based technologies may supplant invasive surgery for mild to moderate skin laxity and/or diminish the extent of surgery and resulting scars. Plastic surgeons play a significant role in improving the quality of life of patients who suffer from obesity and underwent bariatric surgery. We are deeply convinced, however, that the advancement of knowledge and research in this field will determine the introduction of new technologies and custom-made techniques. This advancement will reduce the complication rate with a rapid reintegration of the patient into the world of work and resumption of daily activities.

Functional panniculectomy vs cosmetic abdominoplasty: Multicenter analysis of risk factors and complications

BACKGROUND

Amidst the rising trend of bariatric surgical procedures being performed across the country and around the world, patients seeking functional panniculectomy after massive weight loss represent a different population than those seeking cosmetic abdominoplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether certain complications are more likely to occur in patients undergoing functional panniculectomy, as well as identify risk factors that are implicated in the occurrence of adverse events.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing cosmetic abdominoplasty and functional panniculectomy in North America between 2015 and 2019 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database sponsored by the American College of Surgeons. Comorbidities and postoperative complications between these two cohorts were analyzed with appropriate statistics.

RESULTS

During the study interval, 11,137 patients underwent excision of excessive infraumbilical abdominal skin, including 57.4% (n = 6397) patients undergoing functional panniculectomy and 42.6% (n = 4740) patients undergoing cosmetic abdominoplasty. Patients undergoing functional panniculectomy were significantly more likely to have comorbidities than those undergoing cosmetic abdominoplasty (p < .001). Overall adverse events (p < .001), medical complications (p = .047), surgical complications (p < .001), related readmission (p < .001), and related reoperation (p < .001) were significantly higher in patients undergoing functional panniculectomy. Surgical complications significantly higher in functional panniculectomy included superficial incisional infection (p < .001), deep incisional infection (p < .001), organ/space infection (p < .001), dehiscence (p = .003), and bleeding requiring transfusion (p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing functional panniculectomy are significantly more likely to have comorbidities and experience postoperative wound infection, dehiscence, sepsis, bleeding, related readmission, and related reoperation.

Understanding Uncontrolled Eating after Bariatric Surgery: The Role of Excessive Skin and Body Image Shame

Excess skin and disordered eating behaviors are referred to as some of the major negative consequences of bariatric surgery as well as body image shame. This study sought to explore how discomfort with excessive skin, body image shame, psychological distress, eating-related psychopathology, and negative urgency interact to understand uncontrolled eating among woman submitted to bariatric surgery. A cross-sectional sample of 137 women was evaluated postoperatively through self-report questionnaires assessing discomfort with excess skin, body image shame, eating-related psychopathology, negative urgency, and uncontrolled eating in a hospital center in the north of Portugal. Pearson correlations and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were performed. Body image shame mediated the relationship between discomfort with excess skin and eating-related psychopathology. In turn, the relationship between eating-related psychopathology and uncontrolled eating was mediated by negative urgency. This study highlights the impact of excess skin and body image shame on eating behavior post-bariatric-surgery. Considering the proven impact of uncontrolled eating on weight-loss results post-surgery, understanding the mechanisms underlying this problem is highly important. Our findings provide helpful insight for multidisciplinary teams committed to providing care to bariatric patients struggling with body image and eating difficulties.