Current Management of Cervical Esophageal Cancer

Definitive chemo-radiotherapy in cervical oesophageal cancer: a comprehensive review of literature

Background and Objectives

Despite decades of experience with definitive chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) in cervical oesophageal cancer (CEC), the loco-regional control and survival outcomes are dismal. This review evaluated the outcomes of various treatment strategies being commonly utilized.

Materials and methods

A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles on CEC published from years 2000-2023 addressing the predefined key questions. These questions focussed on the comparative outcomes of various primary treatment approaches (surgery, CRT, or trimodality treatment) and the radiation dose schedules, volumes, and techniques.

Results

CRT is the standard approach for treatment for CEC so far. The potential role of surgery and trimodality approach in settings of evolving surgical approaches needs to be validated. The high dose schedules that are preferentially practiced in CEC have not shown any benefit in improving the disease outcomes over the standard dose schedule of 50.4 Gy. The target volume delineation practice of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) does not have a proven benefit over the involved field irradiation (IFI). The limited evidence on radiation techniques suggests that intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (IMRT/VMAT) techniques can improve toxicity profile over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), but no advantage proven in disease outcomes so far.

Conclusion

This review will guide clinicians in decision-making for the management of this relatively rare entity and the directions for future research in these areas. Future large-scale multicentre prospective studies are needed for validating and standardizing our current practices and exploring potential options to improve the outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes of Cervical Esophageal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Cervical esophageal cancer is a rare malignancy that requires specialized care. While definitive chemoradiation is the standard treatment approach, surgery remains a valuable option for certain patients. This study examined the surgical outcomes of patients with cervical esophageal cancer.

Methods

The study involved a retrospective review and analysis of 24 patients with cervical esophageal cancer. These patients underwent surgical resection between September 1994 and December 2018.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 61.0±10.2 years, and 22 (91.7%) of them were male. Furthermore, 21 patients (87.5%) had T3 or T4 tumors, and 11 (45.8%) exhibited lymph node metastasis. Gastric pull-up with esophagectomy was performed for 19 patients (79.2%), while 5 (20.8%) underwent free jejunal graft with cervical esophagectomy. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 8.3%. During the follow-up period, complications included leakage at the anastomotic site in 9 cases (37.5%) and graft necrosis of the gastric conduit in 1 case. Progression to oral feeding was achieved in 20 patients (83.3%). Fifteen patients (62.5%) displayed tumor recurrence. The median time from surgery to recurrence was 10.5 months, and the 1-year recurrence rate was 73.3%. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 75% and 33.3%, respectively, with a median survival period of 17 months.

Conclusion

Patients with cervical esophageal cancer who underwent surgical resection faced unfavorable outcomes and relatively poor survival. The selection of cases and decision to proceed with surgery should be made cautiously, considering the risk of severe complications.

Treatment and survival analysis for 40-year SEER data on upper esophageal cancer

Background

Upper esophageal cancer (UEC) is rare in both Eastern and Western countries. The epidemiological characteristics and long-term survival of UEC patients are less known. In addition, the choice of optimal treatment for UEC has been controversial.

Methods

Cases of UEC (C15.3 and C15.0) arising during the period from 1973 to 2013 were identified and selected using the SEER database. Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the differences in parameters among different groups. Esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to analyze predictive factors.

Results

In the past 40 years, the cases of UEC have gradually increased, and the proportion of adenocarcinoma (AD) has gradually increased (from 3.6% to 11.8%, p < 0.001). There has been a significant increase (1973-1982 vs. 2004-2013) in median OS (7 months vs. 10 months, p < 0.001) and median ECSS (7 months vs. 11 months, p < 0.001) among UEC patients from 1973 to 2013. For the impact of different treatments, the results showed that the ECSS and OS of surgery without radiation (SWR) and radiation plus surgery (R+S) were superior to those of radiation without surgery (RWS). Subgroup analysis showed that ECSS and OS were highest among patients treated with SWR compared with R+S and RWS for patients with localized disease. For regional disease, ECSS and OS were highest among patients with R+S compared with SWR or RWS. Among patients with regional-stage squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), OS was higher with neoadjuvant radiotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy compared with SWR. Multivariate analysis showed that radiotherapy sequence was dependently associated with OS among patients with regional-stage SCC.

Conclusion

Although the long-term survival of UEC remains poor, it has gradually increased since 1973. This should be closely related to the improvement of medical care over the past 40 years. Different treatment methods have a great influence on the long-term survival of UEC. For localized diseases, surgery may be a better choice. For regional disease, surgery plus adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy may be more beneficial to improve the long-term prognosis of UEC patients.

Segmental cervical esophagectomy with free jejunal flap reconstruction for cervical esophageal cancer in patients with previous history of gastric surgery: a report of two cases

Although free-flap jejunal reconstruction is frequently performed after cervical esophagectomy for cervical esophageal cancer, the procedure after gastric surgery has not been reported. We encountered two patients with esophageal cancer and previous gastric surgeries who eventually underwent segmental esophagectomy with free-flap jejunal reconstruction. Case one involved a 75-year-old man who underwent abdominal abscess and duodenal ulcer perforation surgeries (abdominal drainage and subsequent gastrojejunal bypass). A type 0-IIa tumor was located posterior to the cervical esophagus's right wall, 21 cm from the incisor, without lymph node swelling or distant metastasis. The left lobe of the thyroid gland was mobilized to ensure an oral resection margin. Severe abdominal adhesions required careful adhesiolysis to harvest the jejunum (20 cm long) 40 cm from the jejunojejunostomy. An end-to-side and side-to-end esophagojejunostomy were performed for the proximal and distal ends, respectively. Case two involved a 75-year-old male with a history of distal gastrectomy with Billroth I reconstruction for early gastric cancer. A submucosal tumor-like lesion was located on the cervical esophageal wall on the left side, 21 cm from the incisor. The distal esophagus required additional segmental resection because the anal resection line was close to the tumor. Jejunum (10 cm long) 30 cm from Ligament of Treitz was harvested. An end-to-side and end-to-end esophagojejunostomy for the proximal and distal ends, respectively, was performed. This surgery requires a thorough preoperative examination to ensure an adequate surgical margin and a careful free-flap harvest based on post-gastric surgery anatomy.

Surgical outcomes of reconstruction using the gastric tube and free jejunum for cervical esophageal cancer: analysis using the National Clinical Database of Japan

BACKGROUND

Cervical esophageal cancer accounts for a small proportion of all esophageal cancers. Therefore, studies examining this cancer include a small patient cohort. Most patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergo reconstruction using a gastric tube or free jejunum after esophagectomy. We examined the current status of postoperative morbidity and mortality of cervical esophageal cancer based on big data.

METHODS

Based on the Japan National Clinical Database, 807 surgically treated patients with cervical esophageal cancer were enrolled between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed for each reconstructed organ using gastric tubes and free jejunum.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative complications related to reconstructed organs was higher in the gastric tube reconstruction (17.9%) than in the free jejunum (6.7%) for anastomotic leakage (p < 0.01), but not significantly different for reconstructed organ necrosis (0.4% and 0.3%, respectively). The incidence rates of overall morbidity, pneumonia, 30-day reoperation, tracheal necrosis, and 30-day mortality using these reconstruction methods were 64.7% and 59.7%, 16.7% and 11.1%, 9.3% and 11.4%, 2.2% and 1.6%, and 1.2% and 0.0%, respectively. Only pneumonia was more common in the gastric tube reconstruction group (p = 0.03), but was not significantly different for any other complication.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of overall morbidities and reoperation, especially anastomotic leakage after gastric tube reconstruction, suggested a necessity for further improvement. However, the incidence of fatal complications, such as tracheal necrosis or reconstructed organ necrosis, was low for both reconstruction methods, and the mortality rate was acceptable as a means of radical treatment.

Oncological outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical esophagus treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1222 patients (median age: 63.0 years, 95% CI 61.0-65.0) were included from 22 studies. The median follow-up time was 34.0 months (n = 1181, 95% CI 26.4-36.0). Estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 77.9% (73.9-82.2), 48.4% (43.2-54.3), and 35.3% (29.7-41.9), respectively. The median OS (95% CI) was 33.4 months (25.8-42.2). Estimated pooled PFS rates (n = 595; 95% CI) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 64.1% (57.9-71.0), 38.0% (33.3-45.5), and 29.8% (23.9-37.1), respectively. The median PFS (95% CI) was 19.8 months (14.9-26.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive CRT is a valuable first-line treatment for the management of CESCC. Further studies should focus on survival predictors able to define stage-based clinical guidelines.

Risk factors for early local lymph node recurrence of thoracic ESCC after McKeown esophagectomy

Objectives

Even underwent radical resection, some patients of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are still exposed to local recurrence in a short time. To this end, the present study sought to differentiate patient subgroups by assessing risk factors for postoperative early (within one year) local lymph node recurrence (PELLNR).

Methods

ESCC patients were selected from a prospective database, and divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the time of their local lymphatic recurrence (within one year or later). Survival analysis was conducted by the Cox regression model to evaluate the overall survival (OS) between the two groups. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of different variables were also calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the high-risk factors for PELLNR with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI calculated.

Results

A total of 432 cases were included. The survival of patients in the high-risk group (n = 47) was significantly inferior to the low-risk group (n = 385) (HR = 11.331, 95% CI: 6.870-16.688, P < 0.001). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rate of the patients in high/low-risk groups were 74.5% vs. 100%, 17% vs. 88.8%, and 11.3% vs. 79.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Risk factors for local lymph node recurrence within one year included upper thoracic location (OR = 4.071, 95% CI: 1.499-11.055, P = 0.006), advanced T staging (pT3-4, OR = 3.258, 95% CI: 1.547-6.861, P = 0.002), advanced N staging (pN2-3, OR = 5.195, 95% CI: 2.269-11.894, P < 0.001), and neoadjuvant treatment (OR = 3.609, 95% CI: 1.716-7.589, P = 0.001). In neoadjuvant therapy subgroup, high-risk group still had unfavorable survival (Log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that upper thoracic location (OR = 5.064, 95% CI: 1.485-17.261, P = 0.010) and advanced N staging (pN2-3) (OR = 5.999, 95% CI: 1.986-18.115, P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for early local lymphatic recurrence. However, the cT downstaging (OR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.241-3.086, P = 0.819) and cN downstaging (OR = 0.937, 95% CI: 0.372-2.360, P = 0.890) for patients in the neoadjuvant subgroup failed to lower PELLNR. The predominant recurrence field type was single-field.

Conclusions

Thoracic ESCC patients with lymph node recurrence within one year delivered poor outcomes, with advanced stages (pT3-4/pN2-3) and upper thoracic location considered risk factors for early recurrence.

The comparison of manual and mechanical anastomosis after total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy

Background

Total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy (TPLE) is considered as a curative treatment for hypopharynx cancer and cervical esophageal carcinomas (HPCECs). Traditional pharyngo-gastric anastomosis is usually performed manually, and postoperative complications are common. The aim of this study was to introduce a new technique for mechanical anastomosis and to evaluate perioperative outcomes and prognosis.

Methods

From May 1995 to Nov 2021, a series of 75 consecutive patients who received TPLE for a pathological diagnosis of HPCECs at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital were evaluated. Mechanical anastomosis was performed in 28 cases and manual anastomosis was performed in 47 cases. The data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The mean age was 57.6 years, and 20% of the patients were female. The rate of anastomotic fistula and wound infection in the mechanical group were significantly lower than that in the manual group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stays were significantly higher in the manual group than that in the mechanical group. The R0 resection rate and the tumor characteristics were not significantly different between groups. There was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between the two groups.

Conclusion

The mechanical anastomosis technology adopted by this study was shown to be a safer and more effective procedure with similar survival comparable to that of manual anastomosis for the HPCECs patients.

Oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal cancer treated primarily with surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) treated primarily with surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 868 patients were included from 18 studies. Estimated pooled Overall Survival (OS) rates (95% Confidence Interval, CI) at 1 and 5 years were 74.4% (66.5-83.3), and 26.6% (20.3-34.7), respectively. Larynx non-preserving surgery (n = 229) showed an estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1 and 5 years of 59.3% (51.5-68.2) and 14.6% (8.8-24.3), respectively. On the other hand, larynx preserving surgery (n = 213) showed an estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1 and 5 years of 83.6% (78.2-89.4) and 35.1% (24.9-49.6), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary larynx-preserving surgery remains a valuable option for the management of CEC, with similar survival outcomes compared to primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT). On the other hand, larynx non-preserving surgery showed a significantly reduced survival, that may reflect the more advanced T classification of these tumors. Further studies are mandatory to directly compare primary surgery and primary CRT, distinguishing larynx preserving and non-preserving surgery.

Oncological results and morbidity following intended curative resection and free jejunal graft reconstruction of cervical esophageal cancer: a retrospective Danish consecutive cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of surgery in treatment of locally advanced cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) remains debated. In the European and American treatment guidelines, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is preferred over surgery, while in the Danish guidelines, the two treatment modalities are equally recommended. Surgical treatment of CEC is centralized at our center in Denmark. We present our outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) when possible and resection as first-line therapy for CEC and compare with recent published dCRT results.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients treated for cervical esophageal cancer at Aarhus University Hospital from 2001-2018 with nCRT when possible and pharyngolaryngectomy followed by reconstruction with a free jejunal graft.

RESULTS

Forty consecutive patients were included. About, 45% received nCRT. The median survival was 21 months. The overall, disease-specific and disease-free 5-year survival was 43.6%, 53.2%, and 47.4%, respectively. The rate of microscopically radical resection was 85%. The recurrence rate was 47% and 81% of recurrences were locoregional. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Major complications occurred in 27.9%. Anastomotic leakage, graft failure, fistulas and strictures occurred in 10%, 7.5%, 30%, and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our treatment offers equal oncological results compared to the best internationally published results for dCRT for CEC. Results vary considerably between dCRT studies. Morbidity appears more pronounced following surgery. Future studies are warranted to investigate the Danish national outcomes following dCRT as first-line treatment for curable locally advanced CEC.

Impact of invasion into cervical esophagus for patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The invasion into cervical esophagus (ICE) sometimes could be encountered in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HypoSCC). However, the incidence, predictive factors, and prognostic impact of ICE on the patients with HypoSCC remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient diagnosis with HypoSCC at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2007 and December 2018 were reviewed. All patients were classified into two groups: with and without ICE. The curative treatment included upfront laryngectomy or pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (PLE) with adjuvant chemoradiation, or definite organ-sparing chemoradiation.

RESULTS

We analyzed 527 HypoSCC patients, 71 (13.47%) with and 456 (86.53%) without ICE. ICE presented more frequently in females (odds ratio (OR) = 3.01, p = 0.03) and posterior pharyngeal wall (OR = 2.34, p = 0.04). The 5-year disease-free survival of patients with and without ICE were 21.7% and 54.1%, respectively (p < 0.0001) and the 5-year overall survival were 13.1% and 53.8%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Among patients with ICE, the disease-free and overall survival of patients with upfront PLE were worse than the patients without upfront PLE (p = 0.21 and p = 0.27, respectively). After multivariant cox analysis, ICE was an independent risk factor for disease-free survival (p < 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ICE was occasionally present (13.47%) in HypoSCC patients. Unfortunately, the presence of ICE had a significant impact on disease-free and overall survival. For the HypoSCC patients with ICE, organ-sparing chemoradiation should be considered first as upfront PLE had no additional benefit.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes and Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities for Stage I-III Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma

Purpose: To investigate the survival outcomes, prognostic factors and treatment modalities of stage I-III cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from the period 2004–2016.

Methods: Patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of CEC were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS were performed using Cox proportional hazards models, and OS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results: A total of 347 patients in the SEER database were enrolled. The median OS was 14.0 months, with a 5-year OS rate of 20.9%. The parameters that were found to significantly correlate with OS in the multivariate analysis were age at diagnosis [P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.832], sex [P < 0.001, HR= 1.867], histology [P = 0.001, HR = 0.366], surgery at the primary site [P = 0.021, HR = 0.553], radiotherapy (RT, P = 0.017, HR = 0.637) and chemotherapy (CT, P < 0.001, HR = 0.444). Comparison among the three treatment modalities demonstrated that a triple therapy regimen consisting of surgery, RT and CT was associated with a longer survival time than the other two treatment modalities before and after propensity score matching (PSM). However, triple therapy showed no significant survival benefit over double therapy (P = 0.496 before PSM and P = 0.184 after PSM).

Conclusions: The survival of patients with CEC remains poor. Surgery, RT and CT were all strongly correlated with OS. We recommend a triple therapy regimen for select CEC patients based on the findings of the current study, although this recommendation should be further confirmed by prospective studies with large sample sizes.

Characterization of 500 Chinese patients with cervical esophageal cancer by clinicopathological and treatment outcomes

Objective: There are no comprehensive studies on survival outcomes and optimal treatment protocols for cervical esophageal cancer (CEC), due to its rare clinical prevalence. Our objective was to determine the relationship between pathological characteristics, treatment protocols, and survival outcomes in Chinese CEC patients.

Methods: A total of 500 Chinese CEC patients were selected from our 500,000 esophageal and gastric cardia carcinoma database (1973–2018). There were two main groups: patients treated with surgery, and patients receiving non-surgical treatments (radiotherapy, radiochemotherapy, and chemotherapy). The Chi-square test and Kaplan–Meier method were used to compare the continuous variables and survival.

Results: Among the 500 CEC patients, 278 (55.6%) were male, and the median age was 60.9 ± 9.4 years. A total of 496 patients (99.2%) were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma. In 171 (34.2%) patients who received surgery, 22 (12.9%) had undergone laryngectomy. In 322 (64.4%) patients who received non-surgical treatments, 245 (76.1%) received radiotherapy. Stratified survival analysis showed that only T stage was related with survival outcomes for CEC patients in the surgical group, and the outcomes between laryngectomy and non-laryngectomy patients were similar. It was noteworthy that the 5-year survival rate was similar in CEC patients among the different groups treated with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiochemotherapy (P = 0.244).

Conclusions: The CEC patients had similar survival outcomes after curative esophagectomy and radiotherapy, including those with or without total laryngectomy. These findings suggest that radiotherapy could be the initial choice for treatment of Chinese CEC patients.

Novel hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy for cervical esophageal cancer (with video)

Hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy is developed for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma encroaching or extending above the upper esophageal sphincter. First, a cervical incision was surgically performed followed by cervical lymph node dissection. Second, the margin of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was endoscopically identified with iodine staining and marked endoscopically followed by semi-circumferential or circumferential endoscopic full-thickness excision around the lumen of the esophagus. The distal margin was surgically resected and reconstruction was performed. Among six consecutive patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy, proximal surgical margin was histologically negative in five patients. During a median follow-up period of 15.5 months, all patients tolerated oral intake and were alive without evidence of recurrence. None of the patients experienced aspiration pneumonia, vocal disorder or postoperative anastomotic stricture. Hybrid endoscopy-assisted larynx-preserving esophagectomy could be a clinically feasible treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma providing accurate proximal resection margin with the benefit of laryngeal function preservation.

Thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy for the pharyngoesophageal junction cancer: a single-center experience of multidisciplinary team

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to review the surgical experience and evaluate the feasibility of thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy by multidisciplinary team in the patients with pharyngoesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients with pharyngoesophageal junction cancer who underwent thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy with gastric pull-up reconstruction performed by a collaborative thoracic surgery and otolaryngology surgery team in our department from January 2009 to January 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Surgical experience, Postoperative morbidity, overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years old. Among these patients, 20 had hypopharyngeal cancer, 11 had cervical oesophageal cancer. No patients died during the perioperative period, and the median operation time was 4 h 30 min. The mean hospital stay was 13 days. The rate of complications was 32.3%. There were two cases of anastomotic leakage, four cases of moderate pulmonary infection. The median follow-up period was 31 months. Four patients were lost to follow-up in the second and fourth years and were considered to have died at that time. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 52.6% and 31.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

As a salvage surgery, thoracoscopic total laryngo-pharyngo-oesophagectomy by multidisciplinary team can be performed with an acceptable level of perioperative morbidity and mortality, relatively good recovery, and acceptable survival outcome for patients with pharyngoesophageal junction cancer.

Larynx-preserving limited resection with total thoracic esophagectomy and gastric pull-up reconstruction: A promising treatment for selected cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

There is no consensus on treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Our aim is to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of larynx-preserving limited resection with total thoracic esophagectomy and gastric pull-up reconstruction for the treatment of cervical ESCC without tumor involvement of the larynx and hypopharynx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with cervical ESCC who underwent R0 surgical resection from 2006 to 2011 in our center was performed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival time for patients.

RESULTS

In total, 74 cervical ESCC patients were enrolled in the study. The mortality rate in 30 days was 8.1%, the total complication rate (at least one) was 47.3%, anastomosis leakage occurrence was 37.8%, mechanical ventilation ratewas12.2%, the rate of normal oral diet within 15 days was 71.6%, and the anastomosis recurrence rate in follow-up was 8.1%. Detailed analysis showed that the anastomosis leakage, pulmonary infection, laryngeal recurrent nerve injury, and chylothorax were the most common complications in surgical patients. Finally, the survival data showed that the median survival time was 31.83 months (95% CI=12.39-51.28 months) and the 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 49.1% and 35.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Larynx-preserving limited resection with total thoracic esophagectomy and gastric pull-up reconstruction might be a feasible and effective surgical alternative for the cervical ESCC patients whose tumor does not involve the larynx and hypopharynx.

Larynx-preserving hybrid surgery with endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery and open surgery for cervical esophageal cancer invading pharynx

Larynx preserving hybrid surgery with endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery and open surgery (HELPS) was created for resectable cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) invading the hypopharynx. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness and to evaluate the feasibility of the new HELPS treatment method. Between 2014 and 2018, 19 patients with CEC invading the hypopharynx were treated with HELPS. The postoperative complications and survival rates were reviewed. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis occurred in four patients. All patients consumed food orally without a feeding tube at the time of the discharge. The median follow-up period was 27 months. The 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 94.7 and 71.5%, respectively. HELPS, a new surgical treatment method that utilizes endoscopic surgery, is effective, feasible and beneficial for preserving the larynx in patients with CEC even if the tumor invaded the pharynx.

Clinical significance of the distance between the cricoid cartilage and upper edge of the tumor using PET-CT in cervical esophageal cancer

Cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) is less common compared with thoracic esophageal cancer, and few studies have investigated the clinicopathological features of CESCC. The present study analyzed 69 patients with CESCC who underwent various therapies at the University Hospital of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine between January 2000 and December 2016. The distance between the inferior border of the cricoid cartilage and upper edge of the tumor was evaluated using positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Positive and negative values indicated oral and anal directions, respectively. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the cut-off value for laryngeal preservation was calculated as -5 mm. According to this value, the patients were divided into two groups: The short group (distance from the cricoid cartilage ≥-5 mm) and long group (distance from the cricoid cartilage <-5 mm). There were no significant differences in clinicopathological factors between the two groups except for body mass index. In univariate analysis, the 3-year overall survival rate was significantly lower in short group (45.4 vs. 79.6%; P=0.009). In multivariate analysis, short group was an independent prognostic risk factor (hazard ratio=2.65; P=0.039). This may be due to lymphatic flow around the cervical esophagus.

Mapping of Regional Failures After Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma

Purpose

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the failure patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) after definitive radiotherapy (RT), and illustrate the mapping of regional failures.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed 82 patients with CEC confirmed as squamous cell carcinoma who had completed definitive RT from August 2008 to December 2017. Data on clinical characteristics were collected from the medical records system. Patterns of treatment failures and the survival follow-up were analyzed.

Results

The median age was 58 (38–78) years. In 37 patients, the lesions were limited to the cervical esophagus, while in the remaining 45 patients, the disease got beyond the cervical esophagus (pharynx or thoracic esophagus involved). While 10 patients had stage Ⅱ disease, 72 had stage III disease. The completed median dose for 95% PGTV and 95% PTV was 66 Gy and 58 Gy. While the median follow-up was 27.6 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 16.1 and 28.3 months, respectively. The 3-year PFS and OS was 30.3% and 45.3%, respectively. Treatment failures were reported in 55 patients, of which 22, 8, 7, 9, 2, 3, and 4 patients had developed local, regional, distant, local-regional, regional-distant, local-distant and local-regional-distant failure, respectively. Of the 41 relapsed nodal sites, 28 were located “in-field” whereas 1 was “marginal” and 12 were “out-field”. The most frequent regional relapses were at level VIb, IV and the upper-middle mediastinum.

Conclusion

Regional recurrences focused on lower neck and upper-middle mediastinum, and mainly “in-field”, after definitive RT in patients with CEC.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Larynx-Preserving Surgery for Cervical Esophageal Cancer

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by surgery is widely used for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer in the thorax. This study evaluated the feasibility of neoadjuvant CCRT as a larynx preservation strategy for treating cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) by a multidisciplinary team. Fifteen patients with cervical esophageal SCC who received neoadjuvant CCRT and radical surgery at our institution were reviewed. All patients received CCRT using the intensity-modulated radiation therapy with 48 Gy to gross tumor and 43.2 Gy to regional lymphatic basin in 24 fractions. Side effects, clinical tumor responses, pathological responses, and surgical margin status were analyzed. Pathological T down-staging was noted in seven patients (46.7%); pathological complete response was achieved in three patients (20%). Fourteen patients (93.3%) had larynx preservation; eight patients (53.3%) achieved negative surgical margins. The 2-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and regional relapse-free survival were 50.6%, 62.2%, and 47.5%, respectively. Neoadjuvant CCRT and larynx-sparing surgery are feasible and tolerable in patients with cervical esophageal SCC. Prospectively designed studies for large patient groups and long-term follow-up results are needed for validating this multimodality therapy.

Thyroid and Parathyroid Functions After Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Cervical Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) patients whose larynx function cannot be preserved often undergo chemoradiotherapy, whereas those with residual or recurrent lesions undergo a pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (PLE); however, some need to undergo a pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) for synchronous or metachronous esophageal cancer. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between preoperative irradiation (or the extent of esophageal resection) and postoperative endocrine complications in CEC, including hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism.

METHODS

The cancers of 35 (5.4%) of 678 esophageal cancer patients with esophagectomy treated in 2000-2017 were CECs. We also analyzed the 17 cases of CEC patients who underwent PLE with thyroid lobectomy-11 with irradiation before PLE and 6 without irradiation. Seven patients underwent a PLTE.

RESULTS

Hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism occurred in 14 and 12 patients, respectively. The hypothyroidism rate was significantly higher in patients with irradiation versus those without irradiation (100% vs. 50%; p = 0.010), and the hypoparathyroidism rate was significantly higher in the PLTE versus non-PLTE patients (100% vs. 50%; p = 0.026). The mean levothyroxine dosage was 1.60 μg/kg/day in the PLE patients post-irradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiation appears to be a risk factor for hypothyroidism after PLE with thyroid lobectomy, while PLTE might have some effect on hypoparathyroidism. Due to vocal function loss, PLE patients may experience symptoms from endocrine complications. Levothyroxine treatment soon after PLE for post-irradiation patients and patients requiring as-needed calcium or vitamin D supplementation based on biochemical hypocalcemia for PLE (especially PLTE), may be effective in preventing symptomatic endocrine complications.

Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with cervical esophageal cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is uncommon, accounting for less than 5% of all esophageal cancers. The management of CEC is controversial. This study investigated treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of survival in CEC patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Ninety-one CEC patients were treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) between July 2007 and September 2017. The mean prescription dose was 64 Gy (range 54-70 Gy) delivered as 1.8-2.2 Gy per fraction per day, 5 days a week. Out of 91 patients, 34 received concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) including 18 patients who also received neoadjuvant CT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors of survival were determined in univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox proportional hazard model) analysis. Treatment-related toxicity was also assessed. Median follow-up time for all patients was 19 months. Two-year OS, LRFFS and PFS of all patients were 58.2%, 52.5% and 48.1%, respectively. Clinical stage was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.03-5.37, p = 0.042), LRFFS (HR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.38-10.69, p = 0.011), and PFS (HR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.11-6.45, p = 0.028). Hoarseness was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.05-4.19, p = 0.036). CCRT was independently associated with better LRFFS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.79, p = 0.012). 3DCRT and IMRT with concurrent CT is well-tolerated and may improve local tumor control in CEC patients. Advanced clinical stage and hoarseness are adverse prognostic factors for OS, LRFFS, and PFS in CEC.

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Toxicities

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the survival and toxicities in cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) treated by concurrent chemoradiothrapy with either three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques.

Materials and Methods

A total of 112 consecutive CESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. 3D-CRT and IMRT groups had been analyzed by propensity score matching method, with sex, age, Karnofsky performance status, induction chemotherapy, and tumor stage well matched. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicities were compared between two groups by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 34.9 months, the 3-year OS (p=0.927) and PFS (p=0.859) rate was 49.6% and 45.8% in 3D-CRT group, compared with 54.4% and 42.8% in IMRT group. The rates of grade ≥ 3 esophagitis, grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, esophageal stricture, and hemorrhage were comparable between two groups, while the rate of tracheostomy dependence was much higher in IMRT group than 3D-CRT group (14.3% vs.1.8%, p=0.032). Radiotherapy technique (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.79) and pretreatment hoarseness (HR, 0.12; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.70) were independently prognostic of tracheostomy dependence.

CONCLUSION

No survival benefits had been observed while comparing IMRT versus 3D-CRT in CESCC patients. IMRT with fraction dose escalation and pretreatment hoarseness were considered to be associated with a higher risk for tracheostomy dependence. Radiation dose escalation beyond 60 Gy should be taken into account carefully when using IMRT with hypofractionated regimen.

High-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy for cervical esophageal cancer: Retrospective single-institution study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the role of definitive radiotherapy using higher-than-standard-dose radiation of 50 Gy for carcinoma of the cervical esophagus (CCE).

METHODS

We reviewed 79 patients with stage I-III CCE, treated between 2000 and 2012. Patients received 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrently and were divided into high-dose (≥59.4 Gy, n = 44) and standard-dose (<59.4 Gy, n = 35) groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 35 months for surviving patients. The high-dose group had significantly better 3-year local (90.0% vs 60.4%, P = .001) and locoregional (70.4% vs 45.3%, P = .04) control. Progression-free (45.4% vs 37.5%, P = .32) and overall (58.4% vs 49.1%, P = .69) survival rates were not different. High-dose radiation was an independent prognostic factor for locoregional control (P = .04). No differences in late toxicities (esophageal stenosis or tracheoesophageal fistula) were observed.

CONCLUSION

High-dose radiation for CCE improves local and locoregional control, without increasing severe toxicities.

The management of mid & proximal oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Despite the rise in incidence of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus remains the commonest cell type worldwide and is predominant in the East. Except for very early tumours where endoscopic therapy can be performed with curative intent, in more advanced but potentially curative cancers, treatment for mid and upper third tumours is primarily surgery with extended lymphadenectomy, together with multimodal therapies such as preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is utilized in those who decline surgery or in those who are unfit for major procedures. For cervical oesophageal cancer, the anatomical proximity to the larynx influences the choice of treatment and surgical options. Definitive chemoradiation with the aim of laryngeal preservation has become the treatment of choice; long-term prognosis is believed to be comparable to radical pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy. Selected patients with residual disease or disease recurrence can consider salvage surgery. The decision to operate is a major undertaking as salvage surgery carries high morbidity and even mortality risks. Careful patient selection, choice of treatment, meticulous operative technique and postoperative care are the cornerstones of success.

Tumor xenograft animal models for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant subtype of esophageal cancer worldwide and highly prevalent in less developed regions. Management of ESCC is challenging and involves multimodal treatments. Patient prognosis is generally poor especially for those diagnosed in advanced disease stage. One factor contributing to this clinical dismal is the incomplete understanding of disease mechanism, for which this situation is further compounded by the presence of other limiting factors for disease diagnosis, patient prognosis and treatments. Tumor xenograft animal models including subcutaneous tumor xenograft model, orthotopic tumor xenograft model and patient-derived tumor xenograft model are vital tools for ESCC research. Establishment of tumor xenograft models involves the implantation of human ESCC cells/xenografts/tissues into immunodeficient animals, in which mice are most commonly used. Different tumor xenograft models have their own advantages and limitations, and these features serve as key factors to determine the use of these models at different stages of research. Apart from their routine use on basic research to understand disease mechanism of ESCC, tumor xenograft models are actively employed for undertaking preclinical drug screening project and biomedical imaging research.

Long-term outcome of definitive radiotherapy for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the long-term clinical outcome of definitive radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 30 patients with CESCC [clinical stage I/II/III/IV(M1LYM); 3/2/12/13] (TNM 7th edition) who underwent definitive radiotherapy using 3DCRT between 2000 and 2014 in our institution. The median prescribed dose for the gross tumor and metastatic lymph nodes was 60 Gy. Twenty-six patients underwent elective nodal irradiation for the neck node levels III, IV, and VI and for upper mediastinal lymph nodes with a median dose of 40 Gy. Twenty-six patients underwent concurrent chemotherapy. Initial disease progression sites, locoregional control (LRC) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and toxicities were retrospectively evaluated. A univariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 110 months, the 5- and 10-year LRC rates were 43.7% and 37.4%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 48.3% and 40.2%, respectively. Locoregional, distant and both area accounted for 83%, 6% and 11% of the initial progression sites. Unresectable status and M1LYM were significantly associated with poor LRC (p < 0.05) and OS (p < 0.05). Grade 3 acute non-hematological toxicity occurred in 13.3% of patients. During the follow-up, patients without any disease progression did not need a permanent gastrostomy tube or tracheostomy. Late toxicity events, including hypothyroidism and cardiovascular disease, were observed; 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 hypothyroidism and ≥grade 3 cardiovascular disease were 31.6% and 62.5%, and 17.5% and 21.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive radiotherapy yields a cure for patients with CESCC while preserving their laryngopharyngeal function. The poor LRC rate in the advanced stage needs to be overcome for a better prognosis. As the incidence of radiation-induced hypothyroidism and cardiovascular disease was not low, long-term survivors should be followed up for these symptoms.

Serum microRNA-193b as a promising biomarker for prediction of chemoradiation sensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most predominantly occurring type of esophageal cancer worldwide. Locally advanced ESCC patients are treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation for tumor downstaging prior to tumor resection. Patients receiving this treatment have an increased expectation of cure via the following tumor resection and have better survival outcomes. However, not all patients respond well to chemoradiation and poor responders suffer from treatment-associated toxicity and complications without benefits. No method is currently available to predict patient chemoradiation response and to exclude poor responders from ineffective treatment. To address this clinical limitation, the present study aimed to identify non-invasive biomarkers for predicting patient chemoradiation response. Due to the features of microRNA (miRNA) in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response prediction, serum miRNA arrays were performed to identify potential miRNA(s) that may be used for chemoradiation response prediction in ESCC. Using an miRNA array to compare pre-treatment serum sample pools from 10 good responders and 10 poor responders, the present study identified miR-193b, miR-942 and miR-629* as candidate miRNAs for predicting chemoradiation response. Subsequent validation using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed that miR-193b, however not miR-942 and miR-629*, were significantly increased in sera from 24 good responders, compared with 23 poor responders. Further analyses using the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed a strong predictive power of serum miR-193b on discriminating good responders from poor responders to chemoradiation. In addition, a high serum level of miR-193b was significantly associated with better survival outcomes. Therefore, serum miR-193b may be considered a promising biomarker for predicting chemoradiation response and post-therapy survival of ESCC patients.

Treatment utilization and outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a review of the National Cancer Database

For elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, therapeutic approaches and outcomes in a modern cohort are not well characterized. Patients ≥70 years old with clinical stage II and III esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2012 were identified from the National Cancer Database and stratified based on treatment type. Variables associated with treatment utilization were evaluated using logistic regression and survival evaluated using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Propensity matching (1:1) was performed to help account for selection bias. A total of 21,593 patients were identified. Median and maximum ages were 77 and 90, respectively. Treatment included palliative therapy (24.3%), chemoradiation (37.1%), trimodality therapy (10.0%), esophagectomy alone (5.6%), or no therapy (12.9%). Age ≥80 (OR 0.73), female gender (OR 0.81), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥2 (OR 0.82), and high-volume centers (OR 0.83) were associated with a decreased likelihood of palliative therapy versus no treatment. Age ≥80 (OR 0.79) and Clinical Stage III (OR 0.33) were associated with a decreased likelihood, while adenocarcinoma histology (OR 1.33) and nonacademic cancer centers (OR 3.9), an increased likelihood of esophagectomy alone compared to definitive chemoradiation. Age ≥80 (OR 0.15), female gender (OR 0.80), and non-Caucasian race (OR 0.63) were associated with a decreased likelihood, while adenocarcinoma histology (OR 2.10) and high-volume centers (OR 2.34), an increased likelihood of trimodality therapy compared to definitive chemoradiation. Each treatment type demonstrated improved survival compared to no therapy: palliative treatment (HR 0.49) to trimodality therapy (HR 0.25) with significance between all groups. Any therapy, including palliative care, was associated with improved survival; however, subsets of elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer are less likely to receive aggressive therapy. Care should be taken to not unnecessarily deprive these individuals of treatment that may improve survival.

Clinical results of definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical esophageal cancer: Comparison of failure pattern and toxicities between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for cervical esophageal cancer has not been determined.

METHODS

Eighty patients with cervical esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy from 2002 to 2014 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), failure patterns, and toxicity incidence were compared between the IMRT (N = 32) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (RT; N = 48) groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 35.9 months. The 3-year OS of the IMRT, 3D conformal RT, and total groups was 81.6%, 57.2%, and 66.6%, respectively. Pulmonary toxicity was not observed with IMRT. Six of 62 cases (9.6%) with nodal involvement developed upper cervical node recurrence outside the prophylactic region. Ten patients in the IMRT group were salvaged, and 60% survived without recurrence; 20% of the 3D conformal RT group was salvaged.

CONCLUSION

The IMRT group was comparable with 3D conformal RT group, with a better salvage rate. We recommend extended cervical irradiation for nodal involvement.

Outcome of proximal esophageal cancer after definitive combined chemo-radiation: a Swiss multicenter retrospective study

Objective

To report oncological outcomes and toxicity rates, of definitive platin-based chemoradiadiationtherapy (CRT) in the management of proximal esophageal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with cT1-4 cN0-3 cM0 cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) (defined as tumors located below the inferior border of the cricoid cartilage, down to 22 cm from the incisors) treated between 2004 and 2013 with platin–based definitive CRT in four Swiss institutions. Acute and chronic toxicities were retrospectively scored using the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (CTCAE-NCI v.4.0). Primary endpoint was loco-regional control (LRC). We also evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. The influence of patient- and treatment related features have been calculated using the Log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

We enrolled a total of 55 patients. Median time interval from diagnosis to CRT was 78 days (6–178 days). Median radiation dose was 56Gy (28–72Gy). Induction chemotherapy (ICHT) was delivered in 58% of patients. With a median follow up of 34 months (6–110months), actuarial 3-year LRC, DFS and OS were 52% (95% CI: 37–67%), 35% (95% CI: 22–50%) and 52% (95% CI: 37–67%), respectively. Acute toxicities (dysphagia, pain, skin-toxicity) ranged from grade 0 – 4 without significant dose-dependent differences. On univariable analyses, the only significant prognostic factor for LRC was the time interval > 78 days from diagnosis to CRT. On multivariable analysis, total radiation dose >56Gy (p <0.006) and ICHT (p < 0.004) were statistically significant positive predictive factors influencing DFS and OS.

Conclusion

Definitive CRT is a reliable therapeutic option for proximal esophageal cancer, with acceptable treatment related toxicities. Higher doses and ICHT may improve OS and DFS and. These findings need to be confirmed in further prospective studies.

Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of cervical oesophageal cancer

Cervical oesophageal cancer (CEC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy. The biological behaviour and treatment have not been well studied. This retrospective study reviewed the clinicopathological features of 28 patients with CEC who underwent surgical resection to investigate the biological behaviour, treatment and prognosis of CEC. The long-term outcomes of these patients were compared with those of the CEC patients who received definitive chemoradiotherapy and those of thoracic or abdominal oesophageal cancer patients who underwent surgery. The study group contained 21 men and 7 women, ranging in age from 41 to 67 years (median: 56.5 years). The median survival time and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 25.0 months, 83.8%, 48.8%, and 41.9%, respectively. Only salvage surgery was found to affect the overall survival (P = 0.007). The long-term outcomes for CEC patients who underwent surgery were significantly better than those who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (P = 0.045) but were similar to those of thoracic or abdominal oesophageal cancer patients. In summary, CEC is an uncommon and aggressive malignancy. The malignant potential of CEC is similar to that of thoracic or abdominal oesophageal cancer. Surgical resection is an important therapeutic strategy and may be associated with better survival rates than definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Clinicopathological Features of Cervical Esophageal Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of 63 Consecutive Patients Who Underwent Surgical Resection

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this retrospective study were to elucidate the clinicopathological features and recent surgical results of cervical esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical esophageal cancer has been reported to have a dismal prognosis. Accurate knowledge of the clinical characteristics of cervical esophageal cancer is warranted to establish appropriate therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features and treatment results of 63 consecutive patients with cervical esophageal cancer (Ce group) who underwent surgical resection from 1980 to 2013 were analyzed and compared with 977 patients with thoracic or abdominal esophageal cancer (T/A group) who underwent surgical resection during that time.

RESULTS

Among the patients who received curative resection, the 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates of the Ce patients were significantly better than those of the T/A patients (overall: 77.3% vs 46.5%, respectively, P = 0.0067; disease-specific: 81.9% vs 55.8%, respectively, P = 0.0135). Although total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy procedures were less frequently performed in the recent period, the rate of curative surgical procedures was markedly higher in the recent period (2000-1013) than that in the early period (1980-1999) (44.4% vs 88.9%, P = 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rate in the recent period (71.5%) was significantly better than that in the early period (40.7%, P = 0.0342).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative resection for cervical esophageal cancer contributes to favorable outcomes compared with other esophageal cancers. Recent surgical results for cervical esophageal cancer have improved, and include an increased rate of curative resection and decreased rate of extensive surgery.

Effect of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy on Survival for Patients With Cervical Esophageal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effect of consecutive protocols on overall survival (OS) for cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All CEC cases that received definitive radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy from 1997 to 2013 in 3 consecutive protocols were reviewed. Protocol 1 (P1) consisted of 2-dimensional RT of 54 Gy in 20 fractions with 5-fluorouracil plus either mitomycin C or cisplatin. Protocol 2 (P2) consisted of 3-dimensional conformal RT (3DRT) of ≥60 Gy in 30 fractions plus elective nodal irradiation plus cisplatin. Protocol 3 (P3) consisted of intensity modulated RT (IMRT) of ≥60 Gy in 30 fractions plus elective nodal irradiation plus cisplatin. Multivariable analyses were used to assess the effect of the treatment protocol, RT technique, and RT dose on OS, separately.

RESULTS

Of 81 cases (P1, 21; P2, 23; and P3, 37), 34 local (P1, 11 [52%]; P2, 12 [52%]; and P3, 11 [30%]), 16 regional (P1, 6 [29%]); P2, 3 [13%]; and P3, 7 [19%]), and 34 distant (P1, 10 [48%]; P2, 9 [39%]; and P3, 15 [41%]) failures were identified. After adjusting for age (P=.49) and chemotherapy (any vs none; hazard ratio [HR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.9; P=.023), multivariable analysis showed P3 had improved OS compared with P1 (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8; P=.005), with a trend shown for benefit compared with P2 (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.0; P=.061). OS between P1 and P2 did not differ (P=.29). Analyzed as a continuous variable, higher RT doses were associated with a borderline improved OS (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.0; P=.075). IMRT showed improved OS compared with non-IMRT (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.3-0.8; P=.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The present retrospective consecutive cohort study showed improved OS with our current protocol (P3; high-dose IMRT with concurrent high-dose cisplatin) compared with historical protocols. The outcomes for patients with CEC remain poor, and novel approaches to improve the therapeutic ratio are warranted.

Revisiting the gastric pull-up for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of mortality and morbidity

Gastric pull-up (GPU) is among the oldest techniques for reconstructing the pharyngoesophageal junction following cancer resection. This review examines morbidity and mortality rates following GPU pharyngoesophageal junction reconstruction from 1959 until present: 77 studies, 2,705 patients. The odds of mortality, anastomotic complications, and other complications decreased by 37.2% (95%CI = 28.0-45.3%; P < 0.0001), 8.0% (95%CI = -2.1 to 17.1%; P = 0.12), 21.0% (95%CI 3.5-35.2%; P = 0.021) per decade respectively. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:907-914. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Management algorithm for failed gastric pull up reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Gastric pull up remains a popular reconstructive option for pharyngoesophagectomy defects extending to thoracic inlet. Gastric necrosis is a dreaded complication of gastric pull up reconstruction and few studies report on management of this complication. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science™ databases were searched for publications in the last 25 years on gastric pull up reconstruction following pharyngoesophagectomy. The rates of complications related to gastropharyngeal anastomosis were extracted, and methods of managing gastric necrosis were noted. Forty seven case series were identified reporting on the use of gastric pull up for reconstruction of pharyngoesophageal defects. Mortality rate varied from 0 to 33 % with a weighted average of 8.6 %. In 39 % of patients, mortality was either caused or directly related to failure of the gastropharyngeal anastomosis. The reported rate of gastric necrosis ranged from 0 to 24 % resulting in a 28 % mortality. Options for managing gastric necrosis included: temporary cervical diversion, free jejunum flap, colonic interposition, tubed radial forearm flap, deltopectoralis and pectoralis myocutaneous flaps.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the first case of an anterolateral thigh flap rescue of gastric necrosis after gastric pull up reconstruction. The case report is followed by a review of literature on management of gastric pull up failures.

CONCLUSION

Based on the extracted information, we propose an algorithm for managing gastric pull up failure following pharyngoesophageal reconstruction.

The Role of Induction Therapy for Esophageal Cancer

Survival of esophageal cancer generally is poor but has been improving. Induction chemoradiation is recommended before esophagectomy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma. Both induction chemotherapy and induction chemoradiation are found to be beneficial for locally advanced adenocarcinoma. Although a clear advantage of either strategy has not yet been demonstrated, consensus-based guidelines recommend induction chemoradiation for locally advanced adenocarcinoma.

Cervical esophageal cancer: a gap in cancer knowledge

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the diagnosis, treatment options and treatment-related complications of cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) and to subsequently provide recommendations to improve quality of care.

DESIGN

Studies were identified in PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. A total of 107 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included.

RESULTS

CEC is uncommon, accounting for 2%-10% of all esophageal carcinomas. These tumors are often locally advanced at presentation and have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival of 30%. Tobacco and alcohol consumption seem to be the major risk factors for developing CEC. Surgery is usually not possible due to the very close relationship to other organs such as the larynx, trachea and thyroid gland. Therefore, the current standard of care is definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) with curative intent. Treatment regimens used to treat CEC are adapted by established regimens in lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, dCRT may be accompanied by severe side-effects and complications. Several diagnostic and predictive markers have been studied, but currently, there is no other biomarker than clinical stage to determine patient management. Suggestions to improve patient outcomes are to determine the exact radiation dose needed for adequate locoregional control and to combine radiotherapy with optimal systemic therapy backbone.

CONCLUSION

CEC remains unchartered territory for many practising physicians and patients with CEC have a poor prognosis. To improve the outcome for CEC patients, future studies should focus on the identification of new diagnostic biomarkers or targets for radiosensitizers, amelioration of radiation schedules, optimal combination of chemotherapeutic agents and/or new therapeutic targets.

Oxygen carrier YQ23 can enhance the chemotherapeutic drug responses of chemoresistant esophageal tumor xenografts

PURPOSE

Adjunct chemoradiation is offered to unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, while its use is limited in tumors with strong resistance. Oxygen carriers or anti-hypoxic drugs belong to an emerging class of regulators that can alleviate tumor hypoxia.

METHODS

We investigate the potential use of a novel oxygen carrier YQ23 in sensitizing chemoresistant ESCC in a series of subcutaneous tumor xenograft models developed using ESCC cell lines with different strengths of chemosensitivities.

RESULTS

Tumor xenografts were developed using SLMT-1 and HKESC-2 ESCC cell lines with different strengths of resistance to two chemotherapeutic drugs, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin. More resistant SLMT-1 xenografts responded better to YQ23 treatment than HKESC-2, as reflected by the induced tumor oxygen level. YQ23 sensitized SLMT-1 xenografts toward 5-fluorouracil via its effect on reducing the level of a hypoxic marker HIF-1α. Furthermore, a derangement of tumor microvessel density and integrity was demonstrated with a concurrent decrease in the level of a tumor mesenchymal marker vimentin. Similar to the 5-fluorouracil sensitizing effect, YQ23 also enhanced the response of SLMT-1 xenografts toward cisplatin by reducing the tumor size and the number of animals with invasive tumors. Chemosensitive HKESC-2 xenografts were irresponsive to combined YQ23 and cisplatin treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In all, YQ23 functions selectively on chemoresistant ESCC xenografts, which implicates its potential use as a chemosensitizing agent for ESCC patients.

Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma

Background

Controversies on how to treat upper esophageal carcinoma have existed for several decades. With the application of minimally invasive techniques, surgical treatment to upper esophageal carcinoma tends to show more advantages and attract more patients. Up to now, most hospitals adopted the combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy (CTLE) as the way of minimally invasive surgery for upper esophageal carcinoma. But CTLE to treat upper esophageal carcinoma has its drawbacks, such as demanding certain pulmonary function and severe postoperative regurgitation. In 2011, we developed the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) to treat upper esophageal carcinoma, which showed some advantages. The aim of this article was to compare LTE with CTLE in treating upper thoracic or cervical esophageal carcinoma and assess the value of LTE.

Methods

From 2009 to 2014, esophagectomy has been performed by the introduction of minimally invasive surgery in a total of 83 patients with upper thoracic or cervical esophageal carcinoma. Among these patients, LTE was performed in 27 cases (Group 1), while CTLE was performed in the other 56 (Group 2). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was done in patients of Group 1.

Results

There were no operation-related deaths and conversion to open procedure. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications, ventilation time, ICU stay, hospital stay, and anastomotic leak rates between the two groups. But LTE was associated with shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss. In Group 2, 21 (37.5 %) patients had postoperative pulmonary complications, while in Group 1, there were 6 (22.2 %) patients having pulmonary complications at least one time. Results of 24-h pH monitoring and manometry showed that postoperative laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (PLPR) was more severe in Group 2 patients than in Group 1; for Group 1, PLPR mainly occurred on sleep stage, while for Group 2, PLPR might exist all the day with short intervals and last longer at night. The median overall survival was 27.2 months after CTLE and 30.8 months after LTE (P = 0.962). There was no significant difference in survival at 2, 3 and 4 years between the two groups.

Conclusions

Compared with CTLE, LTE is a more minimally invasive approach to effectively treat patients with upper esophageal carcinoma. Laryngo-pharyngeal reflux after LTE was less severe than that after CTLE, which might lower incidence of pulmonary complications. For the elderly patients, LTE seems more suitable.

14-3-3σ confers cisplatin resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells via regulating DNA repair molecules

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant type of esophageal cancer in Asia. Cisplatin is commonly used in chemoradiation for unresectable ESCC patients. However, the treatment efficacy is diminished in patients with established cisplatin resistance. To understand the mechanism leading to the development of cisplatin resistance in ESCC, we compared the proteomes from a cisplatin-resistant HKESC-2R cell line with its parental-sensitive counterpart HKESC-2 to identify key molecule involved in this process. Mass spectrometry analysis detected 14-3-3σ as the most abundant molecule expressed exclusively in HKESC-2R cells, while western blot result further validated it to be highly expressed in HKESC-2R cells when compared to HKESC-2 cells. Ectopic expression of 14-3-3σ increased cisplatin resistance in HKESC-2 cells, while its suppression sensitized SLMT-1 cells to cisplatin. Among the molecules involved in drug detoxification, drug transportation, and DNA repair, the examined DNA repair molecules HMGB1 and XPA were found to be highly expressed in HKESC-2R cells with high 14-3-3σ expression. Subsequent manipulation of 14-3-3σ by both overexpression and knockdown approaches concurrently altered the expression of HMGB1 and XPA. 14-3-3σ, HMGB1, and XPA were preferentially expressed in cisplatin-resistant SLMT-1 cells when compared to those more sensitive to cisplatin. In ESCC patients with poor response to cisplatin-based chemoradiation, their pre-treatment tumors expressed higher expression of HMGB1 than those with response to such treatment. In summary, our results demonstrate that 14-3-3σ induces cisplatin resistance in ESCC cells and that 14-3-3σ-mediated cisplatin resistance involves DNA repair molecules HMGB1 and XPA. Results from this study provide evidences for further work in researching the potential use of 14-3-3σ and DNA repair molecules HMGB1 and XPA as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for ESCC.

Incidence and prognostic impact of high-risk HPV tumor infection in cervical esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC) is an uncommon malignancy. Limited data supports the use of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as primary treatment. Furthermore, the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) tumor infection in CEC remains unknown. This study retrospectively analyzes both outcomes of CEC patients treated with CRT and the incidence and potential role of HPV tumor infection in CEC lesions.

METHODS

A total of 37 CEC patients were treated with definitive CRT at our institution between 1987 and 2013. Of these, 19 had tumor samples available for high-risk HPV (types 16 and 18) pathological analysis.

RESULTS

For all patients (n=37), 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and loco-regional control (LRC) rates were 34.1%, 40.2%, and 65.6%, respectively. On pathological analysis, 1/19 (5.3%) patients had an HPV-positive lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive CRT provides disease-related outcomes comparable to surgery. Moreover, HPV tumor infection in CEC is uncommon and its prognostic role is unclear. Our data contribute to the construction of an anatomical map of HPV tumor infection in squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the upper aerodigestive tract, and suggest a steep drop in viral infection rates at sites distal to the oropharynx, including the cervical esophagus.