Liver resection for Bismuth type I and Type II hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Does caudate lobe resection really improve the surgical outcomes of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma? A multicenter retrospective study

In the field of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) treatment, the value of caudate lobe resection (CLR) has not been fully elucidated. Most scholars advocate that the caudate lobe should be routinely resected. To further investigate this issue, this study aims to evaluate the impact of CLR on surgical outcomes of HCCA patients who are judged to have no obvious tumor invasion in the caudate lobe. A retrospective analysis was performed on Bismuth type II, III, or IV HCCA patients who underwent radical resection between October 2005 and April 2023 at three Chinese medical centers. Patients were divided into the CLR group and the no caudate lobe resection (No-CLR) group according to whether CLR was performed or not. Baseline and tumor characteristics as well as perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 397 HCCA patients underwent radical resection and there were 146 patients in each group after PSM. After PSM, the mortality was similar between the two groups. However, patients in the CLR group had a higher incidence of postoperative ascites (43.8% vs 30.1%, P=0.021), liver failure (15.8% vs 6.2%, P=0.014) and intra-abdominal infection (19.2% vs 8.2%, P=0.010). The R0 rate in the CLR group was significantly higher than that in the No-CLR group (88.4% vs 76.0%, P=0.009). Nevertheless, patients undergoing CLR did not show any improvement in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS). Multivariate analysis showed that CLR was not associated with improved long-term surgical outcomes. The high level of CA19-9 and lower tumor differentiation were associated with worse OS, and adjuvant therapy can significantly improve OS. Lower tumor differentiation and N2 were associated with worse RFS. In summary, there is not yet sufficient evidence to support the routine resection of the caudate lobe during surgery for HCCA. For patients without obvious tumor invasion in the caudate lobe, resection of the lobe should be carefully weighed for its benefits and risks.

Primary neuroendocrine tumour of the extrahepatic biliary duct

Neuroendocrine tumours of the extrahepatic bile ducts are extremely rare, accounting for only 0.2-2% of gastrointestinal tract neuroendocrine neoplasms. Here, we present an incidental finding of this rare tumour, identified during staging scans post-resection of a malignant rectosigmoid polyp and treated with resection and biliary reconstruction. A suspicious, arterially enhancing porta hepatis lymph node was identified on CT and further investigated with liver MRI and 68Ga DOTATATE PET. These revealed a lobulated lesion of the hilum which showed marked avidity without metastases. The patient underwent a successful radical resection of the extrahepatic biliary ducts (including the left, right and common hepatic ducts), the common bile duct and hepaticojejunostomy formation. Histology revealed a 20-mm well-differentiated NET, WHO Grade 2. Two years later, the patient is alive and well without recurrence. This fascinating case illustrates the importance of thorough preoperative planning of surgical resection for tumours at an unusual primary site.

Cholangiocarcinoma: The Current Status of Surgical Options including Liver Transplantation

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) poses a substantial threat as it ranks as the second most prevalent primary liver tumor. The documented annual rise in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) incidence in the United States is concerning, indicating its growing impact. Moreover, the five-year survival rate after tumor resection is only 25%, given that tumor recurrence is the leading cause of death in 53-79% of patients. Pre-operative assessments for iCCA focus on pinpointing tumor location, biliary tract involvement, vascular encasements, and metastasis detection. Numerous studies have revealed that portal vein embolization (PVE) is linked to enhanced survival rates, improved liver synthetic functions, and decreased overall mortality. The challenge in achieving clear resection margins contributes to the notable recurrence rate of iCCA, affecting approximately two-thirds of cases within one year, and results in a median survival of less than 12 months for recurrent cases. Nearly 50% of patients initially considered eligible for surgical resection in iCCA cases are ultimately deemed ineligible during surgical exploration. Therefore, staging laparoscopy has been proposed to reduce unnecessary laparotomy. Eligibility for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) requires certain criteria to be granted. OLT offers survival advantages for early-detected unresectable iCCA; it can be combined with other treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization, in specific cases. We aim to comprehensively describe the surgical strategies available for treating CCA, including the preoperative measures and interventions, alongside the current options regarding liver resection and OLT.

National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.

A comprehensive study and extensive review of the Caudate lobe: The last piece of "Jigsaw" puzzle

Many liver surgeons have updated their understanding of the liver in recent years because of detailed studies on the liver anatomy and the rapid advances in laparoscopic liver surgery. Despite newer approaches, concepts and methods, research on the caudate lobe continues to be based on case reports and several persistent challenges concerning caudate lobe surgery that are worth discussing. Based on the literature and the author's experience, this study considers and addresses the challenges associated with caudate lobectomy encountered by most liver surgeons. We searched PubMed for relevant articles in English for 'caudate lobe', 'cholangiocellular carcinoma', 'laparoscopic caudate resection', 'right-side boundary of the caudate lobe' and 'assessment of hepatic functional reserve' published up to May 2022. This study reviewed the anatomical history of the caudate lobe, focusing on the challenges associated with caudate lobe-related surgical resection. Due to the unique anatomical position of the caudate lobe, surgical strategy for caudate lobe resection is particularly important, and the technical requirements for hepatobiliary surgeons are also extremely strict. Therefore, understanding the anatomical history of the caudate lobe and discussing the challenges associated with caudate lobectomy is essential.

The value of total caudate lobe resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is widely considered to have a poor prognosis. In particular, combined caudate lobe resection (CLR) as a strategy for radical resection in HCCA is important for improving the R0 resection rate. However, the criteria for R0 resection, necessity of CLR, optimal extent of hepatic resection, and surgical approach are still controversial. This review aimed to summarize the findings and discuss the controversies surrounding CLR. Numerous clinical studies have shown that combined CLR treatment for HCCA improves the R0 resection rate and postoperative survival time. Whether surgery for Bismuth type I or II is combined with CLR depends on the pathological type. Considering the anatomical factors, total rather than partial CLR is recommended to achieve a higher R0 resection rate. In the resection of HCCA, a proximal ductal margin greater than or equal to 10 mm should be achieved to obtain a survival benefit. Although there is no obvious boundary between the right side (especially the paracaval portion) and the right posterior lobe of the liver, Peng's resection line can serve as a reference marker for right-sided resection. Laparoscopic resection of the caudate lobe may be safer, more convenient, accurate, and minimally invasive than open surgery, but it needs to be completed by experienced laparoscopic doctors.

Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A First, Multicenter, Trans-Atlantic, Expert-Center, Collaborative Study

INTRODUCTION

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a difficult cancer to treat with frequent vascular invasion, local recurrence, and poor survival. Due to the need for biliary anastomosis and potential vascular resection, the standard approach is an open operation. Suboptimal outcomes after laparoscopic resection had been sporadically reported by high-volume centers. In this first, Trans-Atlantic, multicenter study, we report our outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This is the largest study of its kind in the Western hemisphere.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2023, we prospectively followed patients undergoing robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at three, high-volume, robotic, liver-surgery centers.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma utilizing the robotic technique; Klatskin type-3 was the most common. The median age was 72 years, and 82% of the patients underwent preoperative biliary drainage. Median operative time was 481 minutes with a median estimated blood loss of 200 mL. The number of harvested lymph nodes was seven, and 11 (28%) patients yielded positive lymph nodes. Three patients required vascular reconstruction; 18% of patients had >1 biliary anastomosis. R0 resection margins were achieved in 82% of patients. Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3 complications were seen in 16% of patients. The length of stay was 6 days. Five patients had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. One patient died within 30 days. With a median follow-up of 15 months, 68% of patients are alive without disease, 13% recurred, and 19% died.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the robotic platform for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible with acceptable short-term clinical and oncological outcomes.

Different Oncologic Outcomes According to Margin Status (High-Grade Dysplasia vs. Carcinoma) in Patients Who Underwent Hilar Resection for Mid-Bile Duct Cancer

Margin positivity after hilar resection (HR) for bile duct cancer is commonly observed due to its longitudinal spread along the subepithelial plane; nevertheless, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the prognostic effects of margins with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or carcinoma. We aimed to investigate the oncologic effect according to the margin status after HR, particularly between the R1 HGD and the R1 carcinoma. From 2008 to 2017, 149 patients diagnosed with mid-bile duct cancer in Samsung Medical Center, South Korea, were divided according to margin status after HR and retrospectively analyzed. Recurrence patterns were also analyzed between the groups. There were 126 patients with R0 margins, nine with R1 HGD, and 14 with R1 carcinoma. The mean age of the patients was 68.3 (±8.1); most patients were male. The mean age was higher in R1 carcinoma patients than in R1 HGD and R0 patients (p = 0.014). The R1 HGD and R1 carcinoma groups had more patients with a higher T-stage than R0 (p = 0.079). In univariate analysis, the prognostic factors affecting overall survival were age, T- and N-stage, CA19-9, and margin status. The survival rate of R0 was comparable to that of R1 HGD, but the survival rate of R0 was significantly better compared to R1 carcinoma (R0 vs. R1 HGD, p = 0.215, R0 vs. R1 carcinoma, p = 0.042, respectively). The recurrence pattern between the margin groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.604). Extended surgery should be considered for R1 carcinoma; however, in R1 HGD, extended operation may not be necessary, as it may achieve oncologic outcomes similar to R0 margins with HR.

Should more aggressive surgical resection be considered in the treatment for Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis

Evidence regarding the optical surgical extent for Bismuth type I/II HCCA is lacking. we aims to evaluate the optimal surgical methods for Bismuth type I/II HCCA. Studies comparing bile duct resection (BDR) and BDR combined with liver resection (BDR + LR) for all types of HCCA patients were searched for analyses, and 14 studies were finally included. The main outcomes were the R0 resection rate and overall survival (OS). For all types of HCCA patents, BDR + LR resulted with higher R0 resection rates when comparing with BDR only (RR = 0.70, 95%CI, 0.63-0.78), and patients with R0 resections had eight times longer median survival and more long-time survival outcomes (3 and 5 year OS) comparing to those with non-R0 resections. Bismuth I/II HCCA patients also showed longer median survival and 3-year OS after R0 resections (P = 0.04). Moreover, there was no significant difference in 3-year OS between BDR and BDR + LR (P = 0.89) and we additionally found BDR resulted in less mortality or morbidity rates. In Europe and US, they resulted the R0 resection rates could be comparable between BDR and BDR + LR (P = 0.18), and Bismuth type I HCCA accounted for 75.8%, while in Asia, BDR + LR still resulted with higher R0 resection rates (P < 0.0001) and the Bismuth type I HCCA accounted for only 40.3%. The surgical approaches may not directly impact patient prognosis, patients with R0 resections are usually associated with improved survival outcomes; for selected Bismuth type I/II HCCA, BDR may be an acceptable option with regard to lower morbidity and comparable R0 resection rate comparing with BDR + LR.

Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Controversies and recommendations

Hilar cholangiocarcinomas are highly aggressive malignancies. They are usually at an advanced stage at initial presentation. Surgical resection with negative margins is the standard of management. It provides the only chance of cure. Liver transplantation has increased the number of 'curative' procedures for cases previously considered to be unresectable. Meticulous and thorough preoperative planning is required to prevent fatal post-operative complications. Extended resection procedures, including hepatic trisectionectomy for Bismuth type IV tumors, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors with extensive longitudinal spread, and combined vascular resection with reconstruction for tumors involving hepatic vascular structures, are challenging procedures with surgical indications expanded. Liver transplantation after the standardization of a neoadjuvant protocol described by the Mayo Clinic has increased the number of patients who can undergo operation.

Oncological outcome of proximal and middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer according to surgical extent (Is hilar resection oncologically acceptable in proximal and middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer?)

BACKGROUND

For proximal to middle bile duct cancer, it is controversial whether bile duct resection alone is sufficient, or whether hepatic or pancreatic resection should be accompanied by initial planning. This study aimed to determine the optimal surgical extent based on oncological outcomes in patients with proximal to middle bile duct cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for proximal to middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer, hilar resection, or combined resection of other organs were included. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analyses were compared according to operation type.

RESULTS

Among 156 patients in total, R0 rate was 56.7% for hilar resection and 82.7% for other organ resection. Although hilar resection was associated with shorter hospital stay and fewer overall complications, operation type did not affect overall survival (p = 0.259) and disease-free-survival (p = 0.774). Overall survival differed according to R status (5YSR 49.8 vs. 27.1%; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

In proximal to middle extrahepatic bile duct cancer, surgery should be tailored to achieve R0 resection according to the extent of the disease rather than uniformly resecting extensively with other organ resections. Hilar resection could be selected if R0 resection is feasible, considering the lower morbidity with similar long-term survival.

Current Perspectives on the Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents nearly 15% of all primary liver cancers and 2% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) accounts for 50-60% of all CCA. First described in 1965, pCCAs arise between the second-order bile ducts and the insertion of the cystic duct into the common bile duct. CCA typically has an insidious onset and commonly presents with advanced, unresectable disease. Complete surgical resection is technically challenging, as tumor proximity to the structures of the central liver often necessitates an extended hepatectomy to achieve negative margins. Intraoperative frozen section can aid in assuring negative margins and complete resection. Portal lymphadenectomy provides important prognostic and staging information. In specialized centers, vascular resection and reconstruction can be performed to achieve negative margins in appropriately selected patients. In addition, minimally invasive surgical techniques (e.g., robotic surgery) are safe, feasible, and provide equivalent short-term oncologic outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by liver transplantation provides a potentially curative option for patients with unresectable disease. New trials are needed to investigate novel chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and targeted therapies to better control systemic disease in the adjuvant setting and, potentially, downstage disease in the neoadjuvant setting.

Surgical Strategies for Bismuth Type I and II Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact on Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach to treat Bismuth type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) has been a topic of debate. We sought to characterize whether bile duct resection (BDR) with or without concomitant hepatic resection (HR) was associated with R0 margin status, as well as define the impact of HR+BDR versus BDR alone on long-term survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent HR+BDR for HCCA between 2000 and 2014 were identified from a multi-institutional database. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared among patients who underwent BDR only, BDR+left hepatic resection (LHR), and BDR+right hepatic resection (RHR) for Bismuth type I and II HCCA.

RESULTS

Among 257 patients with HCCA, 61 (23.7%) patients had a Bismuth type I (n=25, 41.0%) or II (n=36, 59.0%) lesion. The incidence of R0 resection after BDR only was the same as among patients after LHR and RHR (BDR 70.0% vs. BDR+LHR 71.4% vs. BDR+RHR 76.5%, p=0.891). In contrast, severe complications were more likely after LHR and RHR than BDR only (BDR 21.4% vs. BDR+LHR 60.0% and BDR+RHR 50.0%, p=0.041). Overall (median: BDR 20.9 vs. BDR+LHR 23.2 and BDR+RHR 25.0 months, p=0.213) and recurrence-free (median: BDR 13.4 vs. BDR+LHR 15.3 and BDR+RHR 25.0, p= 0.109) survival were comparable. On multivariable analysis, while CA19-9>37.0U/ml (Ref. CA19-9≤37.0U/ml, HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.4, p=0.035) and AJCC T3-T4 disease (Ref. T1-T2, HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-13.7, p=0.007) were associated with long-term survival, surgical approach was not (BDR+LHR: HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-2.2, p=0.937; BDR+RHR: HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.3, p=0.197).

CONCLUSION

R0 resection, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were comparable among well-selected patients who had BDR versus BDR+HR for Bismuth type I and II HCCA.

Current Surgical Management of Peri-Hilar and Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for approximately 10% of all hepatobiliary tumors and represents 3% of all new-diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) accounts for 10% of all cases, perihilar (h-CCA) cholangiocarcinoma represents two-thirds of the cases, while distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for the remaining quarter. Originally described by Klatskin in 1965, h-CCA represents one of the most challenging tumors for hepatobiliary surgeons, mainly because of the anatomical vascular relationships of the biliary confluence at the hepatic hilum. Surgery is the only curative option, with the goal of a radical, margin-negative (R0) tumor resection. Continuous efforts have been made by hepatobiliary surgeons in order to achieve R0 resections, leading to the progressive development of aggressive approaches that include extended hepatectomies, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, pre-operative portal vein embolization, and vascular resections. i-CCA is an aggressive biliary cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium proximal to the second-degree bile ducts. The incidence of i-CCA is dramatically increasing worldwide, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy. An aggressive surgical approach, including extended liver resection and vascular reconstruction, and a greater application of systemic therapy and locoregional treatments could lead to an increase in the resection rate and the overall survival in selected i-CCA patients. Improvements achieved over the last two decades and the encouraging results recently reported have led to liver transplantation now being considered an appropriate indication for CCA patients.

The value of caudate lobectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma treatment: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To discuss the value of caudate lobectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE database, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for trials comparing combined caudate lobectomy with controls from January 1, 1990 to December 2, 2020. The outcomes were postoperative radical cure information, survival condition, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULT

Ten studies were included. No difference was observed in the morbidity (odd ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.33) and mortality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.55-2.42) between the combined caudate lobectomy and control groups. Hepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy was associated with higher incidence of radical resection (OR 3.88, 95% CI 2.18-6.90) and longer survival (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.38-0.55).

CONCLUSION

Combining caudate lobectomy can significantly increase the incidence of radical resection of HCCA and the postoperative survival time. The morbidity and mortality were not increased after the operation. Thus, caudate lobectomy should be included when performing partial hepatectomy for HCCA.

Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Bismuth Type I and II Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Bile Duct Resection with or Without Hepatectomy?

BACKGROUND

The role of hepatic resection in the treatment of type I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) remains controversial. In the present study, we aimed to identify whether hepatic resection was necessary for type I and II HCCA.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients classified as type I and II HCCA undergoing surgical resection were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: bile duct resection (BDR) group (n = 15) and hepatic resection (HR) group (n = 8). Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the R0 resection and long-term survival between BDR and HR for Bismuth type I and II HCCA. A total of 7 studies with 260 cases were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In our cohort, the R0 resection rate was 73.3% in BDR group and 87.5% in HR group. The HR group had a higher number of postoperative complications than the BDR group (P = 0.002). There was no difference in long-term survival (P = 0.544) and recurrence (P = 0.846) between BDR and HR in Bismuth type I and II HCCA. The meta-analysis showed that HR was associated with better R0 resection rate (RR 4.45, 95% CI 2.34-8.48) and overall survival (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.34-3.44) compared with BDR group. There was no publication bias and undue influence of any single study.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed that HR was associated with better R0 resection rate and overall survival compared with BDR for type I and II HCCA patients. More aggressive surgical strategies should be increasingly considered for the treatment of type I and II HCCA patients.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of caudate lobectomy for treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) patients. This meta-analysis aimed to review the current evidence on perioperative and long-term outcomes of routine caudate lobe resection (CLR) for surgical treatment of hilar CCC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases was performed for studies providing comparative data on perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing resection for hilar CCC with and without CLR. The MINORS score was used for quality assessment. For time-to-event outcomes hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% CI were extracted from identified studies, whereas risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for overall morbidity, mortality, and resection margin status. Meta-analyses were carried out using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Eight studies involving 1350 patients met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included studies was low to moderate. CLR resulted in significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.49; 95%CI 0.32-0.75, P < 0.01). Postoperative morbidity (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.77-1.13; P = 0.48) and mortality (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.42-2.41; P = 0.99) rates were comparable between both groups. Patients without concomitant CLR were at higher risk for residual tumor at the resection margin (RR 1.40; 95% CI 1.09-1.80; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CLR is associated with improved long-term survival and negative tumor margins after resection of hilar CCC with no adverse impact on perioperative outcomes. CLR might provide the potential to become a standard-of-care procedure in the surgical management of hilar CCC.

Surgical Considerations of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Hilar lesions are most common. Patients present with obstructive jaundice and intrahepatic bile duct dilation. Cross-sectional imaging reveals local, regional, and distant extent of disease, with direct cholangiography providing tissue for diagnosis. The consensus of a multidisciplinary committee dictates treatment. Resection of the extrahepatic bile duct and ipsilateral hepatic lobe with or without vascular resection and transplantation after neoadjuvant protocol are options for curative treatment. The goal of surgery is to remove the tumor with negative margins. Patients with inoperable tumors or metastatic disease are best served with palliative chemoradiotherapy.

Left Hepatectomy with Combined Resection and Reconstruction of Right Hepatic Artery for Bismuth Type I and II Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Right hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy (RHx) is considered an appropriate procedure for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in terms of its anatomical and oncological aspect. However, validity of left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy (LHx) concomitant with arterial resection and reconstruction (AR) is not fully evaluated.

METHODS

The patients who underwent surgical resection for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2002 and 2013 were studied. The standard procedure for Bismuth type I/II cholangiocarcinoma in the institute was RHx, while in patients who had insufficient functional reserve of the left liver, LHx was selected, irrespective of the necessity of AR. The clinicopathologic and perioperative outcomes after LHx + AR were compared with those after RHx.

RESULTS

The surgical procedures comprised LHx + AR in 12 and RHx in 24. The left liver volume and left liver functional reserve were significantly lower with LHx + AR than with RHx (left liver volume: 28.0 vs. 33.7%, p = 0.026; estimated indocyanine green clearance of the left liver: 0.036 vs. 0.046, p < 0.001). The rate of surgical morbidity was almost identical between the two procedures. No arterial reconstruction-related complications occurred. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates and median survival time were 66.7%, 41.7% and 44 months for LHx + AR and 70.8%, 49.0% and 57 months for RHx (p = 0.640).

CONCLUSION

LHx + AR for Bismuth type I/II perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is considered to be a valid alternative to RHx in patients with an insufficient left liver functional reserve.

Surgery for cholangiocarcinoma

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. For both perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), 5-year overall survival of about 30% has been reported in large series. This review addresses several challenges in surgical management of cholangiocarcinoma. The first challenge is diagnosis: a biopsy is typically avoided because of the risk of seeding metastases and the low yield of a brush of the bile duct. However, about 15% of patients with suspected pCCA are found to have a benign diagnosis after resection. The second challenge is staging; even with the best preoperative imaging, a substantial percentage of patients has occult metastatic disease detected at staging laparoscopy or early recurrence after resection. The third challenge is an adequate volume and function of the future liver remnant, which may require preoperative biliary drainage and portal vein embolization. The fourth challenge is a complete resection: a positive bile duct margin is not uncommon because the microscopic biliary extent of disease may be more extensive than perceived on imaging. The fifth challenge is the high post-operative mortality that has decreased in very high volume Asian centres, but remains about 10% in many Western referral centres. The sixth challenge is that even after a complete resection most patients develop recurrent disease. Recent randomized controlled trials found conflicting results regarding the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. The final challenge is to determine which patients with cholangiocarcinoma should undergo liver transplantation rather than resection.

Morbidity and mortality after major liver resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are known to be high. However, reported postoperative outcomes vary, with notable differences between Western and Asian series. We aimed to determine morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and assess differences in outcome regarding geographic location and hospital volume.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through November 20, 2017. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis and metaregression were performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies were included, representing 4,634 patients. Pooled 30-day and 90-day mortality were 5% (95% CI 3%-6%) and 9% (95% CI 6%-12%), respectively. Pooled overall morbidity and severe morbidity were 57% (95% CI 50%-64%) and 40% (95% CI 34%-47%), respectively. Western studies compared with Asian studies had a significantly higher 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and overall morbidity: 8% versus 2% (P < .001), 12% versus 3% (P < .001), and 63% versus 54% (P = .048), respectively. This effect on mortality remained significant after correcting for hospital volume. Univariate metaregression analysis showed no influence of hospital volume on mortality or morbidity, but when corrected for geographic location, higher hospital volume was associated with higher severe morbidity (P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are high. The Western series showed a higher mortality compared with the Asian series, even when corrected for hospital volume. Standardized reporting of outcomes is necessary. Underlying causes for differences in outcomes between Asian and Western centers, such as differences in treatment strategies, should be further analyzed.

Actual Long-Term Survival Outcome of 403 Consecutive Patients with Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Despite aggressive surgical resection, prognosis of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma is still unsatisfactory. There were limited data about actual long-term survival outcome. This study was designed to explore actual long-term survival outcome of hilar cholangiocarcinoma after surgical treatment, and to investigate the characteristics of patients with actual long-term survival.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 403 consecutive patients with at least 5-year follow-up after surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma at Seoul National University Hospital between 1991 and 2010. Prognostic factors were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models, and the effect of adjuvant treatment was evaluated by propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

Of all patients, R0 resection rate was 41.2 and 63.8 % among intended curative resection. Adjuvant therapy was performed in 48.8 % after curative surgery. Actual 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 18.9, and 30.1 % after R0 resection. Actual 5-year disease-free survival rate was 25.8 % after resection. Adjuvant treatment improved prognosis in patients with positive metastatic lymph nodes (median OS 21.9 vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.003). Overall recurrence rate was 55.0 %, and distant metastasis (39.7 %) was more frequent than loco-regional recurrence (20.8 %). Lymph node metastasis (p = 0.021) and poor histologic grade (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors after curative resection. Patients who survived more than 5 years had less lymph node metastasis (p = 0.025), poor histologic differentiation (p = 0.010), R2 resection (p = 0.040), and recurrence (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Actual 5-year OS rate after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is 30.1 %. Adjuvant treatment could be beneficial in patients with lymph node metastasis.

Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: early results of en bloc portal vein resection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyse the safety, feasibility and survival outcomes of our treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) since the introduction of more aggressive approaches (en bloc, vascular and extended liver resections) in 2007.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From July 2007 to December 2014, 32 consecutive patients with PHC underwent surgery with curative intent. Surgery with resection and reconstruction of the portal vein bifurcation and right hepatic artery was performed if necessary for a complete removal of the tumour. Perioperative data and postoperative histological findings, tumour recurrence rates and survival rates were recorded. Seventeen (53%) of the patients presented with stage IIIb or IV according to the UICC classification system.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate in our series was 45%, and this percentage increased to 65% when patients with advanced stage cancer (stage IIIb or higher) were excluded. We performed 3 arterials and 23 portal vein reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent extended hemihepatectomy. We achieved cancer-free margins in 19 patients (60%). Tumour stage and nodal involvement were the most important prognostic factors. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates of this cohort were 72% (23) and 15.6% (5), respectively; these results were similar to data published by other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An aggressive approach involving en bloc or extended liver resection combined with vascular reconstruction provides acceptable morbidity and mortality and increases the 5-year survival rate of PHC.

The Surgical Management of Klatskin Tumours: Has Anything Changed in the Last Decade?

Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinomas requires complex pre-, intra- and post-operative decision-making. Despite the significant progress in liver surgery over the years, several issues such as the role of pre-operative biliary drainage, portal vein embolisation, staging laparoscopy and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remain unresolved. Operative strategies such as vascular resection, caudate lobe resection and liver transplant have also been practiced in order to improve R0 resectability and improved survival. The review aims to consolidate evidence from major studies in the last 11 years. Survival data were only included from studies that reported the results in at least 30 patients with 1-year follow-up. A significant number of patients may be prevented an unnecessary laparotomy if they underwent a staging laparoscopy. There remain no guidelines as to when portal vein embolisation or pre-operative biliary drainage should be employed but most studies agree with pre-operative biliary drainage being an absolute indication if portal vein embolisation is performed. Concomitant hepatectomy and caudate lobectomy increases R0 resection but vascular resection cannot be routinely recommended. Liver transplant at specialised centres in selective patients has had impressive results. Guidelines are required for pre-operative biliary drainage and portal vein embolisation and randomised trials are required in order to define the role of vascular resection in achieving a R0 resection and increasing survival.

Imaging of the postoperative liver: review of normal appearances and common complications

Several benign and malignant liver diseases may require surgical treatment for cure, including anatomical resections based on the segmental anatomy of the liver, non-anatomical (wedge) resections, and surgical management of biliary cysts. The type of surgery depends not only on the location and the nature of the disease, but also on the expertise of the surgeon. Whereas ultrasonography is often the first-line imaging examination in case of suspected postoperative complication, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is of greater value for identifying normal findings after surgery, early postoperative pathologic fluid collections and vascular thromboses, and tumor recurrence in patients who have undergone hepatic surgery. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice for depicting early postoperative bile duct injuries and ischemic cholangitis that may occur in the late postoperative phase. Both MDCT and MRCP can accurately depict tumor recurrence. Radiologists should become familiar with these surgical procedures to better understand postoperative changes, and with the normal imaging appearances of various postoperative complications to better differentiate between complications and normal findings.

Individualized preoperative planning using three-dimensional modeling for Bismuth and Corlette type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

A detailed evaluation of blood supply anatomy, especially the biliary anatomy at the hepatic hilus, is essential to ensure a complete and curative resection for Bismuth and Corlette type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The study aimed to investigate the impact of individualized preoperative planning using 3D modeling on surgical treatment for type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma (n=47) who underwent surgery at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Department of Zhujiang Hospital between March 2007 and January 2015. All patients had undergone preoperative computed tomography (CT) examination, and 3D images were reconstructed. Preoperative surgery simulation was performed, and the simulation was applied in the subsequent surgery. Clinical, surgical, and pathological characteristics were compared between patients undergoing preoperative planning (n=25) and those who did not (n=22). Complications were examined.

RESULTS

Surgical time and blood loss were significantly smaller in patients with 3D reconstruction compared to those without. The number of bile duct orifices was correctly estimated in 14/25 (56.0%) patients with preoperative planning. The width of the hepatic surgical margin could be measured for 18 hepatic ducts, and 17 (68.0%) of them were pathologically diagnosed as margin-negative.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique has the advantages of precise visualization of the anatomic structures and 3D assessment of biliary branches and vessels, allowing improved operative planning for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Is Pancreaticoduodenectomy Feasible for Recurrent Remnant Bile Duct Cancer Following Bile Duct Segmental Resection?

BACKGROUND

When bile duct cancer recurs after surgery, treatment options are limited. This study examines the usefulness of reoperative pancreaticoduodenectomy for recurrent cancer after initial segmental bile duct resection.

METHODS

Six patients (5 males, 1 females; median age 65 years) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for recurrent remnant bile duct cancer following segmental bile duct resection were included: 4 underwent surgery at Severance Hospital and 2 at Gangnam Severance Hospital from January 2000 to December 2013. Medical records data were retrospectively reviewed, including demographics, type of first and second surgery, radicality of resection, TNM stage, adjuvant treatments, complications, and survival. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze survival.

RESULTS

The median interval between operations was 57 (range 7-95) months. Median operation time was 6.9 (range 5.2-12.8) h, blood loss was 400 (range 50-1170) mL, intensive care unit stay was 1 (range 1-2) day, and postoperative hospital stay was 33 (range 15-55) days. No patient died. Four had severe complications. The median survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy was 16 (range 5-89) months. Four patients had recurrence. T stage, N stage, and resection radicality influenced survival.

CONCLUSION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is reasonable for recurrent remnant bile duct cancer following segmental bile duct resection, particularly for patients with no distant metastasis, locally confined recurrence, and good general condition.

Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: New advances

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma, a malignant tumor that occurs in the left and right hepatic duct, is the most common form of bile duct carcinoma. Early diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is difficult, and the majority of patients are diagnosed in advanced stages. Therefore, surgery for this malignancy is difficult, has high risk, and is associated with a poor prognosis. In recent years, with the development of imaging technology and extended radical surgery, the preoperative diagnosis and surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma have been improved. However, hilar cholangiocarcinoma still has a low cure rate, high complication rate, and poor prognosis. Therefore, we should strengthen the research on the susceptible factors and biological characteristics of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and improve early diagnosis. Currently, although there has been no unified standard for the resectability of the tumor, surgery combined with partial hepatectomy is strongly recommended in patients without surgical contraindication. This paper reviews the recent progress in surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure

BACKGROUND

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor affecting the extrahepatic bile duct. Surgical treatment offers the only possibility of cure, and it requires removal of all tumoral tissues with adequate resection margins. The aims of this review are to summarize the findings and to discuss the controversies on the extent of surgical resection aiming at cure for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

The English medical literatures on hilar cholangiocarcinoma were studied to review on the relevance of adequate resection margins, routine caudate lobe resection, extent of liver resection, and combined vascular resection on perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of patients with resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Complete resection of tumor represents the most important prognostic factor of long-term survival for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The primary aim of surgery is to achieve R0 resection. When R1 resection is shown intraoperatively, further resection is recommended. Combined hepatic resection is now generally accepted as a standard procedure even for Bismuth type I/II tumors. Routine caudate lobe resection is also advocated for cure. The extent of hepatic resection remains controversial. Most surgeons recommend major hepatic resection. However, minor hepatic resection has also been advocated in most patients. The decision to carry out right- or left-sided hepatectomy is made according to the predominant site of the lesion. Portal vein resection should be considered when its involvement by tumor is suspected.

CONCLUSION

The curative treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains challenging. Advances in hepatobiliary techniques have improved the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of this tumor.

Major hepatectomy in Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Historically, hilar bile duct resection (HBDR) has been regarded as the choice of treatment for Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). The present study aimed to evaluate the advantages of major liver resection (MLR) in the treatment of patients with Bismuth types I and II HCCA when compared with HBDR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2005 and September 2012, in total, 52 patients with Bismuth types I and II HCCA who underwent HBDR alone or MLR were included for retrospective analysis. The intraoperative outcomes, postoperative complications, and oncological outcomes including recurrence and overall or disease-free survival rate were compared.

RESULTS

The MLR group had significantly higher curative resection rates compared with the HBDR group (95% versus 62.5%, P = 0.021) and lower tumor recurrence (28% versus 63%, P = 0.049), albeit with longer operating time (395.5 ± 112.7 versus 270.9 ± 98.8, P < 0.001), and higher blood transfusion requirements (70% versus 16%, P < 0.001). MLR resulted in significantly higher overall postoperative morbidity (70% versus 34.4%, P = 0.012), compared with HBDR alone. When restricted to R0 resections for all the procedures, MLR significantly increased the overall postoperative survival rate compared with the HBDR group (P = 0.016); the overall survival rate at 1, 3 y was 68.4% and 60.8% for MLR group and 59.6% and 21.9% for HBDR group, respectively. Also, the disease-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent MLR, as compared with those who underwent HBDR (53.2% versus 0% at 3 y, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that MLR results in higher curative resections, fewer recurrences, and increased postoperative survival rate for Bismuth types I and II HCCA as compared with HBDR alone. However, there is a need for well-designed, multicenter studies to be undertaken to better inform a decision on the standard treatment for Bismuth types I and II HCCA.

Curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: prognostic factors for clinical decision making

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) has largely evolved, and increased resectability rates are reported. Large series of patients with resections for HC were published in the last years, and potential predictors for survival were explored. However, the usefulness of these predictors in clinical decision making is controversial.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present review is to explore the main prognostic factors after curative-intent surgery for HC, as emerged from the current literature. Furthermore, the impact of these predictors on clinical decision making is assessed.

CONCLUSION

An aggressive surgical approach has improved the survival rates in patients with HC and implies bile duct resection associated with liver resection and loco-regional lymph node dissection. The AJCC staging system remains the main tool to assess the prognosis after resection of HC. Margin-negative resections and absence of lymph node metastases are the main prognostic factor after curative-intent surgery for HC. Response to chemotherapy is also a prognostic factor. Markers of systemic inflammatory response might predict prognosis of patients with HC, but their usefulness in clinical decision making remains unclear.