The Depth from the Skin to the Celiac Artery Measured Using Computed Tomography is a Simple Predictive Index for Longer Operation Time During Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy

Impact of preoperative weight loss achieved by gastric balloon on peri- and postoperative outcomes of bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: a retrospective matched-pair analysis

Background

An intragastric balloon is used to cause weight loss in super-obese patients (BMI > 60 kg/m²) prior to bariatric surgery. Whether weight loss from intragastric balloon influences that from bariatric surgery is poorly studied.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-center study, the effects of intragastric balloon in 26 patients (BMI 69.26 ± 6.81) on weight loss after bariatric surgery (primary endpoint), postoperative complications within 30 days, hospital readmission, operation time, and MTL30 (secondary endpoints) were evaluated. Fifty-two matched-pair patients without intragastric balloon prior to bariatric surgery were used as controls.

Results

Intragastric balloon resulted in a weight loss of 17.3 ± 14.1 kg (BMI 5.75 ± 4.66 kg/m²) with a nadir after 5 months. Surgical and postoperative outcomes including complications were comparable between both groups. Total weight loss was similar in both groups (29.0% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.362). Direct postoperative weight loss was more pronounced in the control group compared to the gastric balloon group (29.16 ± 7.53% vs 23.78 ± 9.89% after 1 year, p < 0.05 and 32.13 ± 10.5% vs 22.21 ± 10.9% after 2 years, p < 0.05), who experienced an earlier nadir and started to regain weight during the follow-up.

Conclusion

A multi-stage therapeutic approach with gastric balloon prior to bariatric surgery in super-obese patients may be effective to facilitate safe surgery. However, with the gastric balloon, pre-treated patients experienced an attenuated postoperative weight loss with an earlier nadir and earlier body weight regain. This should be considered when choosing the appropriate therapeutic regime and managing patients’ expectations.

Distance of Peritoneum to Inferior Mesenteric Artery Predicts the Operation Time During Laparoscopic Colectomy for Sigmoid or Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Obesity is a major technical limiting factor for laparoscopic surgery because abundant visceral fat is known to extend the operation time. However, special hardware is needed to assess it. We hypothesized that the depth from the peritoneum to the bifurcation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) defined as 'peritoneum to IMA distance (PID)' might be a simple predictive factor for extended operation time during laparoscopic colectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-four patients who were diagnosed with sigmoid or rectosigmoid colon cancer and underwent laparoscopic colectomy were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the operation time (210 min). The vertical distance from the peritoneum to the bifurcation of the inferior mesenteric artery was defined as PID. The factors eliciting an operation time longer than 210 min were investigated.

RESULTS

There was significant difference in sex, BMI, cT, cN, and PID between the Early group (<210 min) and Late group (≥210 min). Less blood loss was observed in the Early group than in the Late group. Multivariate analysis showed that PID was the only independent factor that affected operation time (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

PID predicts the operation time during laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid or rectosigmoid colon cancer.

Significance of prediction of the dorsal landmark using three-dimensional computed tomography during laparoscopic lymph node dissection along the proximal splenic artery in gastric cancer

Objectives:

Dissection of the No. 11p lymph nodes is technically challenging because of variations in anatomical landmarks. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and efficacy of predicting the dorsal landmark of No. 11p lymph node using three-dimensional computed tomography simulation.

Methods:

Laparoscopic gastrectomy with No. 11p lymph node dissection with preoperative simulation using three-dimensional computed tomography was performed in 24 patients at our institution from October 2016 to May 2018. Initially, preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography findings with operative videos in these 24 patients were compared. The dorsal landmark was defined as an anatomical structure behind the splenic artery on preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography and operative videos. The dorsal landmark of No. 11p lymph node was divided into four types: (1) splenic vein type, (2) splenic vein and pancreas type, (3) pancreas type, and (4) unclear type. Then, to investigate the efficacy of three-dimensional computed tomography, we compared the clinical and pathological features and surgical outcomes of nine patients who underwent preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography simulation (three-dimensional computed tomography group) and 23 patients who did not undergo three-dimensional computed tomography simulation from August 2014 to September 2016 (non-three-dimensional computed tomography group). All procedures were performed by one surgeon certified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System in Japan.

Results:

The concordance rate between three-dimensional computed tomography and operative videos of the dorsal landmark using three-dimensional computed tomography was 79% (19/24). The operative time of No. 11p lymph node dissection was significantly shorter in the three-dimensional computed tomography group than in the non-three-dimensional computed tomography group (7.7 versus 15.8 min, P = 0.044).

Conclusion:

The accuracy of predicting the dorsal landmark of No. 11p lymph node using three-dimensional computed tomography was extremely high. Preoperative simulation with three-dimensional computed tomography was useful in shortening the operative time of No. 11p lymph node dissection.

Use of the subcutaneous lumbar spine (SLS) index as a predictor for surgical complications in lumbar spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar spine surgeries require adequate exposure to visualize key structures and limited exposure can make surgery more technically difficult, thus increasing the potential for complications. Body mass index and body mass distribution have been shown to be associated with worse surgical outcomes.

PURPOSE

This study aims to further previous investigations in elucidating the predictive nature of body mass distribution with peri- and postoperative complications in lumbar surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective study conducted at a single institution.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred eighty-five patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy, laminotomy, or posterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures between 2013 and 2016.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and electronic medical records were reviewed for measurements and relevant complications.

METHODS

Previously known risk factors were identified and MRI measurements of subcutaneous adipose depth (SAD) relative to spinous process height (SPH) were measured at the surgical site to generate the subcutaneous lumbar spine (SLS) index. This measurement was then analyzed in association with recorded surgical complications.

RESULTS

The SLS index was found to be a significant risk factor for total complications (0.292, p=.041), perioperative complications (0.202, p=.015), and need for revision surgery (0.285, p<.001). The SAD alone proved to be negatively associated with perioperative complications (-0.075, p=.034) and need for revision surgery (-0.104, p=.001), with no predictive association seen for total or postoperative complications. Linear regression revealed an SLS index of 3.43 as a threshold value associated with a higher risk of total complications, 5.8 for perioperative complications, and 3.81 for the need for revision surgeries.

CONCLUSION

Body mass distribution of the surgical site as indicated by SAD to SPH (SLS index) is significantly associated with increasing risk of postoperative and perioperative complications as well as increased likelihood for necessary revision surgery. This relationship was shown to be a more accurate indication of perioperative risk than previous standards of body mass index and SAD alone, and may allow spine surgeons to assess surgical risk when considering lumbar spine surgery using simple calculations from standard preoperative MRI results.