Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma

Differential Colorectal Cancer Mortality Across Racial and Ethnic Groups: Impact of Socioeconomic Status, Clinicopathology, and Treatment-Related Factors

INTRODUCTION

Non-Hispanic Black (Black) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have a higher risk of mortality than most other racial/ethnic groups. Limited studies examine the contribution of socioeconomic (SES), clinicopathologic, or treatment variations to mortality disparities. This retrospective cohort investigation examined the extent to which SES, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors explain racial/ethnic differences in CRC mortality.

METHODS

We studied 146,515 individuals, 18+ years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of CRC within 2010-2017, identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We performed Cox regression analyses to examine the association of race and ethnicity, surgery type, and tumor site with all-cause mortality and CRC-specific mortality. We then performed mediation analysis to quantify the extent to which mortality differences were mediated by SES, clinicopathologic, and treatment factors.

RESULTS

Black patients had a significantly higher hazard of all-cause mortality than non-Hispanic White (White) patients. The White versus Black patients' comparison demonstrated that variations in SES and clinicopathologic factors significantly explained 46.63% (indirect effect HR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.93) and 10.87% (indirect effect HR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) of the excess all-cause mortality among Black patients, respectively. The Hispanic versus Black comparisons identified SES as the most influential mediator, explaining 19.68% of the excess all-cause mortality. The proportions mediating for CRC-specific mortality showed comparable outcomes to all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Black patients had a greater risk for all-cause mortality and CRC-specific mortality attributed to SES and clinicopathologic variations compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Future studies should investigate equity in healthcare through interventions addressing SES-related disparities.

Closing the Gap: Approaches to Improving Colorectal Surgery Care for the Uninsured and Underinsured

Health insurance plays a critical role in access to and delivery of health care in the United States. As the only industrialized nation without universal health coverage, Americans without adequate insurance (i.e., uninsured or underinsured individuals) face numerous obstacles to obtaining necessary health care. In this article, we review the mechanisms by which inadequate insurance leads to worse clinical outcomes in patients with common benign and malignant colorectal pathologies. We then discuss several evidence-based solutions for improving access to optimal colorectal care for these patients. These include increasing access to and affordability of health insurance, mitigating disparities between differently insured populations, strengthening the health care safety net, and tailoring outreach and clinical decision-making for the uninsured and underinsured. By exploring the nuance and impact of inadequate insurance coverage, we ultimately seek to highlight critical opportunities for future research and advocacy within the realm of insurance design and policy.

Colorectal cancer care continuum: Navigating screening, treatment, and outcomes disparities

This review investigates the disparities in colorectal cancer screening, treatment, and outcomes among different racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic groups. Although there has been progress, notable disparities continue to exist as a result of socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and systemic prejudices. Approaches to tackle these challenges involve expanding screening access, enhancing healthcare utilization, addressing socioeconomic obstacles, ensuring fair treatment, and boosting representation in research.

Interaction of Insurance and Neighborhood Income on Operative Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Within a National Database

INTRODUCTION

Sociodemographic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgical patients are known. Few studies, however, have examined the intersection of insurance type and median household income (MHI).

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2019, all CRC surgery patients between 50 and 64 y old were included. Patients were further stratified based on insurance type (commercial, Medicaid, and uninsured) as well as county-level MHI quartiles. Outcomes included nonelective surgery (primary outcome), inpatient mortality, complications, and blood transfusions. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sociodemographic variables, medical comorbidities, and hospital-level factors.

RESULTS

Of 108,606 patients, 80.5% of patients had commercial insurance, while 5.8% were uninsured. On multivariate analysis, Medicaid or no insurance, especially when living in a lower-income community, were associated with significantly higher odds of nonelective surgery (ORs: 1.11-4.54). There was a stepwise effect on nonelective surgery by insurance type (uninsured with lower odds than insured) and MHI (each lower quartile had higher odds). There were similar trends for inpatient blood transfusions, but there were no significant differences in mortality or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Especially when considered together, noncommercial insurance and lower MHI were associated with worse outcomes in CRC patients. Insurance was more protective than MHI against worse outcomes. These findings among a screening-aged cohort have policy planning implications for insurance expansions and healthcare funding allocations. Further research is needed to understand the complex underlying mechanisms that create this interaction between insurance and MHI.

Unveiling Equitable Surgical Prioritization: Insights From a Comprehensive Analysis Using the Medically Necessary and Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) Scoring System

BACKGROUND

This study addresses the intricate landscape of racial disparities in healthcare delivery, with a specific focus on surgical procedures. The concern was accentuated by the challenges posed during the COVID-19 pandemic when resources became scarce. Recognizing the potential impact of provider bias in medical decision-making, the American College of Surgeons introduced the Medically Necessary and Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) scoring system. This methodology aims to address procedures that, while not emergent, are deemed medically necessary and time-sensitive. This study analyzed whether using this scoring system decreased racial disparities between patients receiving surgery during the pandemic.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using Electronic Medical Records from June 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. We analyzed variations in MeNTS scores and time to surgery based on racial and ethnic backgrounds using bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis included 2,997 patients. Of these, 1,442 (42.84%) were Hispanic participants, 1,282 (38.09%) were non-Hispanic participants, and 642 (19.07%) were participants of other specified ethnic backgrounds. The racial composition comprised 2,955 (87.79%) White participants, 98 (2.91%) Asian participants, 50 (1.49%) African American participants, and 72 (2.14%) Alaska Native or American Indian participants. No significant differences in mean days to surgery or MeNTS scores were observed across racial and ethnic groups (Hispanic participants = 76.62 vs. non-Hispanic participants = 78.82, P = 0.8). A multivariate survival model showed that MeNTS scores below 30 were associated with higher surgery likelihood, with no significant disparities in race, ethnicity, or gender.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive study utilizing the MeNTS scoring system reveals an absence of statistically significant racial disparities in surgical prioritization. These findings contribute valuable insights to the ongoing discourse surrounding equitable healthcare practices and emphasize the potential efficacy of standardized scoring systems in mitigating biases in medical decision-making.

The effects of socioeconomic status on complex ventral hernia repair operative decision-making and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patients from low socioeconomic backgrounds have greater rates of morbidity and mortality across disease processes. The Distressed Communities Index identified several socioeconomic components that were used to create a Distressed Communities Index score for every ZIP code, then broken into quintiles from prosperous to distressed. We aimed to explore whether socioeconomic distress as defined by the Distressed Communities Index affects the outcome of complex ventral hernia repair in the elderly population.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed using the Abdominal Core Health Collaborative data. Included were adults aged 65+ years undergoing elective complex ventral hernia repair from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes were postoperative outcomes and composite hernia recurrence by Distressed Communities Index quintile. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for composite recurrence, and logistic regression was used for postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 4,172 patients were included. Patients in distressed communities were more likely to identify as female or racial minority and had greater body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists class. Lower Distressed Communities Index quintile was associated with larger hernia (P = .012), open repair (P = .019), and 30-day complication (P = .05). There was no association between time to recurrence and Distressed Communities Index quintile (P = .24). After adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference for readmission, reoperation, recurrence, and complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients from more distressed communities presented in worse clinical status with larger hernias. This likely contributed to greater rates of open repair and complications. However, when adjusted for these variables, outcomes were similar across Distressed Communities Index quintile. This supports the efficacy of complex hernia repair across socioeconomic classes.

Acceptable outcomes of liver transplantation in uninsured patients under the coverage of a state assistance program

The lack of health insurance is a major barrier to access to health care, even in the case of life-saving procedures such as liver transplantation (LT). Concerns about worse outcomes in uninsured patients have also discouraged the evaluation and transplantation of patients without adequate health insurance coverage. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes from the largest cohort of uninsured patients who underwent LT with the support of a state payment assistance program (also called charity care). This study included all consecutive patients who underwent LT at a single center from 2002 to 2020. Demographic, clinical, and social variables and outcome metrics were collected and compared between insured and uninsured patients. Among a total of 978 LT recipients, 594 had private insurance, 324 government insurance (Medicare/Medicaid), and 60 were uninsured and covered under a state charity care program. In the charity care group, there was a higher proportion of Hispanic subjects, single marital status, younger age, and high-MELD score patients. The 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 89.0% and 81.8% in private insurance patients, 88.8% and 80.1% in government insurance recipients, and 93.3% and 79.6% in those with charity care ( p =0.49). There was no difference in graft survival between insured and uninsured patients ( p =0.62). The 3 insurance groups presented similar hospital length-of-stay and 30-day readmission rates. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, uninsured status (charity care) was not associated with worse patient survival (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.84-1.80, p =0.29) or graft survival (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.84-1.78, p =0.29). In conclusion, there was no difference in outcomes after LT between insured and uninsured patients. A charity care program may be an effective tool to mitigate socioeconomic disparities in both outcomes and access to LT.

Disparities in outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities

BACKGROUND

Disparities in colorectal cancer screening have been documented among people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). However, surgical outcomes in this population have yet to be studied. The present work aimed to evaluate the association of IDD with outcomes following colorectal cancer resection.

METHODS

All adults undergoing resection for colorectal cancer in the 2011-2020 National Inpatient Sample were identified. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were developed to examine the association of IDD with risk factors as well as outcomes including mortality, complications, costs, length of stay (LOS), and non-home discharge. The study is limited by its retrospective nature and did not capture disease staging or time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 722,736 patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection, 2,846 (0.39%) had IDD. Compared to patients without IDD, IDD patients were younger and had a higher burden of comorbidities. IDD status was associated with increased odds of non-elective admission (AOR 1.40 [95% CI 1.14-1.73]) and decreased odds of treatment at high-volume centers (AOR 0.64 [95% CI 0.51-0.81]). Furthermore, IDD patients experienced significantly greater LOS (9 vs 6 days, p<0.001) and hospitalization costs ($23,500 vs $19,800, p<0.001) relative to neurotypical patients. Upon risk adjustment, IDD was significantly associated with 2-fold increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.34 [95% CI 1.48-3.71]), 1.4-fold increase in complications (AOR 1.41 [95% CI 1.15-1.74]), and 6.8-fold increase in non-home discharge (AOR 6.83 [95% CI 5.46-8.56]).

CONCLUSIONS

IDD patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection experience increased likelihood of non-elective admission, adverse clinical outcomes, and resource use. Our findings highlight the need for more accessible screening and patient-centered interventions to improve quality of surgical care for this at-risk population.

Uncommon Sociodemographic Factors Are Associated With Racial Disparities in Length of Stay Following Oncologic Elective Colectomy

INTRODUCTION

Although outcome disparities by race have been identified in colorectal cancer, these patterns are challenging to explain using variables that are commonly available in databases. In a single institution serving a diverse community, length of stay (LOS) varies by race following elective oncologic colectomy. We investigated previously unexplored variables that may explain the relationship between race and LOS following elective resection of colorectal neoplasms.

METHODS

Retrospective, single institution cohort study from January 2015 to December 2020 for adult patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resections. Baseline demographic variables and intraoperative factors were analyzed for changes in LOS following elective colorectal resection. Additional retrospective chart review was carried out to determine household member composition and distance from home to hospital. Bivariate analysis was conducted to determine which variables should be included in multivariable analyses. All analyses were conducted using SAS Academic.

RESULTS

Most patients (n = 383) were Asian (40%), Black (12%), or Hispanic (26%). Race and LOS were associated with age (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001 for race and LOS, respectively), American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001), enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001), household members (P = 0.009 and P = 0.002), and discharge disposition (P = 0.049 and P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, household members (P = 0.021) independently remained associated with LOS after controlling for race (P = 0.008) and discharge disposition (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Household member composition varies with LOS, suggesting that level of support at home may influence decisions regarding discharge disposition, which lead to differences in LOS.

Racial Disparities in Bowel Preparation and Post-Operative Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Combined pre-operative bowel preparation with oral antibiotics (OAB) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is the current recommendation for elective colorectal surgery. Few have studied racial disparities in bowel preparation and subsequent post-operative complications.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used 2015-2021 ACS-NSQIP-targeted data for elective colectomy for colon cancer. Multivariate regression evaluated predictors of post-operative outcomes: post-operative ileus, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection (SSI), operative time, and hospital length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

72,886 patients were evaluated with 82.1% White, 11.1% Black, and 6.8% Asian or Asian Pacific Islander (AAPI); 4.2% were Hispanic and 51.4% male. Regression accounting for age, sex, ASA classification, comorbidities, and operative approach showed Black, AAPI, and Hispanic patients were more likely to have had no bowel preparation compared to White patients receiving MBP+OAB. Compared to White patients, Black and AAPI patients had higher odds of prolonged LOS and pro-longed operative time. Black patients had higher odds of post-operative ileus.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities exist in both bowel preparation administration and post-operative complications despite the method of bowel preparation. This warrants exploration into discriminatory bowel preparation practices and potential differences in the efficacy of bowel preparation in specific populations due to biological or social differences, which may affect outcomes. Our study is limited by its use of a large database that lacks socioeconomic variables and patient data beyond 30 days.

Social Determinants of Health Needs and Health-related Quality of Life Among Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 8512 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess associations between social determinants of health (SDOH) needs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among surgical patients.

BACKGROUND

Despite the profound impact of SDOH on health outcomes, studies examining the effect of SDOH needs on HRQOL among surgical patients are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using responses from the SDOH needs assessment and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems Global Health instrument of adults seen in surgical clinics at a single institution. Patient characteristics including socioeconomic status (insurance type, education level, and employment status) were extracted. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of global health scores.

RESULTS

A total of 8512 surgical patients (mean age: 55.6±15.8 years) were included. 25.2% of patients reported one or more SDOH needs. The likelihood of reporting at least one SDOH need varied by patient characteristics and socioeconomic status variables. In fully adjusted regression models, food insecurity [odds ratio (OR), 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38-1.70 and OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.81, respectively], housing instability (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.43 and OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.70, respectively) lack of transportation (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68 and OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00-1.57, respectively), and unmet medication needs (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.52 and OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.28-2.03, respectively) were independent predictors of poor physical and mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

SDOH needs are independent predictors of poor patient-reported physical and mental health among surgical patients. Assessing and addressing SDOH needs should be prioritized in health care settings and by policymakers to improve HRQOL.

Surgical Cancer Care in Safety-Net Hospitals: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tertiary medical centers in the USA provide specialized, high-volume surgical cancer care, contributing standards for quality and outcomes. For the most vulnerable populations, safety-net hospitals (SNHs) remain the predominant provider of both complex and routine healthcare needs. The objective of this study was to evaluate access to and quality of surgical oncology care within SNHs.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all studies (January 2000-October 2021) reporting the delivery of surgical cancer care at SNHs in the USA (PROSPERO #CRD42021290092). These studies describe the process and/or outcomes of surgical care for gastrointestinal, hepatopancreatobiliary, or breast cancer patients seeking treatment at SNHs.

RESULTS

Of 3753 records, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Surgical care for breast cancer (43%) was the most represented, followed by colorectal (30%) and hepatopancreatobiliary (16%) cancers. Financial constraints, cultural and language barriers, and limitations to insurance coverage were cited as common reasons for disparities in care within SNHs. Advanced disease at presentation was common among cancer patients seeking care at SNHs (range, 24-61% of patients). Though reports comparing cancer survival between SNHs and non-SNHs were few, results were mixed, underscoring the variability in care seen across SNHs.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight barriers in care facing many cancer patients. Continued efforts should address improving both access and quality of care for SNH patients. Future models include a transition away from a two-tiered system of resourced and under-resourced hospitals toward an integrated cancer system.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) surgery (MIS) for colorectal cancer is associated with improved outcomes. We sought to characterize possible disparities in surgical approach and outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, colorectal adenocarcinoma cases among non-Hispanic white (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic patients were identified using the National Cancer Database (2010-2017). Logistic and Poisson regressions, generalized logit models, and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess outcomes, with reclassification of surgery type if converted to open.

RESULTS

NHB patients were less likely to undergo robotic surgery. After multivariable analysis, NHB patients were 6% less likely, while Hispanic patients were 12% more likely to undergo a MIS approach. Lymph node retrieval was higher (> 1.3% more, p < 0.0001) and length of stay was shorter (> 17% shorter, p < 0.0001) for MIS approaches. Unplanned readmission was lower for MIS colon cancer operations compared with open operations, but not for rectal cancer. Race/ethnicity-adjusted risk of death was lower with MIS approaches for colon as well as rectal cancer. After adjusting for surgery type, risk of death was 12% lower for NHB and 35% lower for Hispanic patients compared with NHW patients. Hispanic patients had 21% lower risk of death, while NHB patients had 12% higher risk of death than NHW patients with rectal cancer, after adjusting for surgery type.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial/ethnic disparities exist in utilization of MIS for colorectal cancer treatment, disproportionately affecting NHB patients. Since MIS has the potential to improve outcomes, suboptimal access may contribute to harmful and thus unacceptable disparities in survivorship.

Factors contributing to the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested disparities in access to robotic colorectal surgery, however, it is unclear which factors are most meaningful in the determination of approach relative to laparoscopic or open surgery. This study aimed to identify the most influential factors contributing to robotic colorectal surgery utilization.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of published studies that compared the utilization of robotic colorectal surgery versus laparoscopic or open surgery. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations in September 2021.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were included in the analysis. Patients were less likely to undergo robotic versus laparoscopic surgery if they were female (OR = 0.91, 0.84-0.98), older (OR = 1.61, 1.38-1.88), had Medicare (OR = 0.84, 0.71-0.99), or had comorbidities (OR = 0.83, 0.77-0.91). Non-academic hospitals had lower odds of conducting robotic versus laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.73, 0.62-0.86). Additional disparities were observed when comparing robotic with open surgery for patients who were Black (OR = 0.78, 0.71-0.86), had lower income (OR = 0.67, 0.62-0.74), had Medicaid (OR = 0.58, 0.43-0.80), or were uninsured (OR = 0.29, 0.21-0.39).

CONCLUSION

When determining who undergoes robotic surgery, consideration of factors such as age and comorbid conditions may be clinically justified, while other factors seem less justifiable. Black patients and the underinsured were less likely to undergo robotic surgery. This study identifies nonclinical disparities in access to robotics that should be addressed to provide more equitable access to innovations in colorectal surgery.

Trends in utilization of laparoscopic colectomy according to race: an analysis of the NIS database

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with improved recovery and decreased complications when compared to an open approach. Consequently, the rates of laparoscopic colectomy have increased. Race has been identified as a factor that influences a patient's likelihood of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the rates of laparoscopic colectomy stratified by race over time.

METHODS

Patients were selected using procedure codes for colectomy within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2009 to 2018. The primary independent variable was race (Black, BL; Hispanic, HI; White, WH), and the primary outcome was surgical approach (laparoscopic vs open). Covariates included age, sex, case complexity, insurance status, income, year of surgery, urbanicity, region, bedsize, and teaching status. We examined the univariable association of race with laparoscopic vs open colectomy with chi-square. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of race with procedure type adjusting for covariates. All analyses were done using SAS (version 9.4, Cary, NC) with p < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS

267,865 patients (25,000 BL, 19,685 HI, and 223,180 WH) were identified. Laparoscopy was used in 47% of cases, and this varied significantly by race (BL 44%, HI 49%, WH 47%, p < .0001). After adjusting for covariates, Black patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy vs White patients (aOR 0.92, p < 0.0001). Utilization of laparoscopy was similar in Hispanic compared to White patients (aOR 1.00, p = 0.9667). Racial disparity in the adjusted odds of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy was persistent over time.

CONCLUSION

Race was independently associated with the rate of laparoscopic colectomy, with Black patients less likely to receive laparoscopic surgery than White patients. This disparity persisted over a decade. Attention should be paid to increasing the rates of laparoscopic colectomy in under-represented populations in order to optimize surgical care and address racial disparities.

Gender Disparities in Aortoiliac Revascularization in Patients with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

Gender disparities have been previously reported in aortic aneurysm and critical limb ischemia outcomes; however, limited info is known about disparities in aortoiliac occlusive disease. We sought to characterize potential disparities in this specific population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent aortobifemoral bypass and aortic thromboendarterectomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 35646 and 35331) between 2012 and 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. A binomial regression model was used to estimate gender differences in 30-day morbidity and mortality. Inverse probability weighting was used to standardize demographic and surgical characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1,869 patients, of which 39.8% were female and the median age was 61 years. Age, body composition, and other baseline characteristics were overall similar between genders; however, racial data were missing for 26.1% of patients. Females had a higher prevalence of preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (20.9% vs. 14.7%, prevalence difference 6.1%, P < 0.01), diabetes mellitus (25.4% vs. 19.4%, prevalence difference 6.0%, P < 0.01), and high-risk anatomical features (39.4% vs. 33.7%, prevalence difference 5.8%, P = 0.01). Preprocedural medications included a statin in only 68.2% of patients and antiplatelet agent in 76.7% of patients. Females also had a higher incidence of bleeding events when compared to males (25.2% vs. 17.5%, standardized risk difference 7.2%, P < 0.01), but were less likely to have a prolonged hospitalization greater than 10 days (18.2% vs. 20.9%, standardized risk difference -5.0%, P = 0.01). The 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between genders (4.7% vs. 3.6%, standardized risk difference 1.2%, P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients treated with aortobifemoral bypass or aortic thromboendarterectomy are more likely to have preexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and high-risk anatomical features. Regardless of a patient's gender, there is poor adherence to preoperative medical optimization with both statins and antiplatelet agents. Female patients are more likely to have postoperative bleeding complications while males are more likely to have a prolonged hospital stay greater than 10 days. Future work could attempt to further delineate disparities using databases with longer follow-up data and seek to create protocols for reducing these observed disparities.

Colorectal cancer disparities across the continuum of cancer care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Disparate colorectal cancer outcomes persist in vulnerable populations. We aimed to examine the distribution of research across the colorectal cancer care continuum, and to determine disparities in the utilization of Surgery among Black patients.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of colorectal cancer disparities studies was performed. The meta-analysis assessed three utilization measures in Surgery.

RESULTS

Of 1,199 publications, 60% focused on Prevention, Screening, or Diagnosis, 20% on Survivorship, 15% on Treatment, and 1% on End-of-Life Care. A total of 16 studies, including 1,110,674 patients, were applied to three meta-analyses regarding utilization of Surgery. Black patients were less likely to receive surgery, twice as likely to refuse surgery, and less likely to receive laparoscopic surgery, when compared to White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2011, the majority of research focused on prevention, screening, or diagnosis. Given the observed treatment disparities among Black patients, future efforts to reduce colorectal cancer disparities should include interventions within Surgery.

Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Care for Black Patients: Barriers and Solutions

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer for Black patients have led to a significant mortality difference when compared to White patients, a gap which has remained to this day. These differences have been linked to poorer quality insurance and socioeconomic status in addition to lower access to high-quality health care resources, which are emblematic of systemic racial inequities. Disparities impact nearly every point along the colorectal cancer care continuum and include barriers to screening, surgical care, oncologic care, and surveillance. These critical faults are the driving forces behind the mortality difference Black patients face. Health care systems should strive to correct these disparities through both cultural competency at the provider level and public policy change at the national level.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infection

Necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is a medical emergency. We investigated the impact of racial, socioeconomic disparities, and comorbidities on mortality, complications, length of stay, and charges in patients with NSTI.

Data were acquired from the National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015 to 2017. ICD-10, Clinical Modification codes were utilized to identify relevant cases. Logistic regression was used to assess socioeconomic, racial, and health risk factors for adverse outcomes in NSTI patients.

Of 16,071,053 cases identified during the study period, 15,078 (0.094%) NSTI cases were recognized. Black patients had increased odds of amputation (OR 1.40 95% CI 1.24-1.58, p < 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (OR 1.40 95% CI 1.24-1.58, p < 0.001), excessive charges (OR 1.22 95% CI 1.03-1.43, p = 0.019), and adverse discharge disposition (OR 1.32 95% CI 1.19-1.46, p < 0.001) compared to white patients. Hispanic patients had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.30 95% CI 1.05-1.60, p = 0.014) and amputation (OR 1.21 95% CI 1.04-1.42, p = 0.016) compared to white patients. Medicare patients had increased odds of mortality (OR 1.35 95% CI 1.09-1.67, p = 0.006), Medicaid patients had increased odd of amputation (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.17-1.51, p < 0.001) and prolonged LOS (OR 1.33 95% CI 1.17-1.51, p < 0.001). Patients in the lower income quartiles had decreased odds of amputation compared to the highest income quartile, including the 26^th to 50^th income quartile (OR 0.84 95% CI 0.73-0.98, p = 0.022) and 51^st to 75^th income quartile (OR 0.84 95% CI 0.73-0.98, p = 0.022).

Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist for patients being treated for NSTIs.

Racial Disparities in 30-Day Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery in an Integrated Healthcare System

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in colorectal surgery outcomes have been studied extensively in the USA, and access to healthcare resources may contribute to these differences. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated healthcare network in the USA with the potential for equal access care to veterans. The objective of this study is to evaluate the VHA for the presence of racial disparities in 30-day outcomes of patients that underwent colorectal resection.

METHODS

Colon and rectal resections from 2008 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were categorized by race and ethnicity. Multivariable analysis was used to compare 30-day outcomes. Cases with "unknown/other/declined to answer" race/ethnicity were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-six-thousand-nine-hundred-sixty-nine cases met inclusion criteria: 27,907 (75.5%) Caucasian, 6718 (18.2%) African American, 2047 (5.5%) Hispanic, and 290 (0.8%) Native American patients. There were no statistically significant differences in overall complication incidence or mortality between all cohorts. Compared to Caucasian race, African American patients had longer mean length of stay (10.7 days vs. 9.7 days; p < 0.001). Compared to Caucasian race, Hispanic patients had higher odds of pulmonary-specific complications (adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval = 1.39 [1.17-1.64]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The VHA provides the benefits of integrated healthcare and access, which may explain the improvements in racial disparities compared to existing literature. However, some racial disparities in clinical outcomes still persisted in this analysis. Further efforts beyond healthcare access are needed to mitigate disparities in colorectal surgery. CLASSIFICATIONS: [Outcomes]; [Database]; [Veterans]; [Colorectal Surgery]; [Morbidity]; [Mortality].

Racial Disparities in the Management of Locoregional Colorectal Cancer

Racial disparities pervade nearly all aspects of management of locoregional colorectal cancer, including time to treatment, receipt of resection, adequacy of resection, postoperative complications, and receipt of neoadjuvant and adjuvant multimodality therapies. Disparate gaps in treatment translate into enduring effects on survivorship, recurrence, and mortality. Efforts to reduce these gaps in care must be undertaken on a multilevel basis and focus on modifiable factors that underlie racial disparity.

The impact of hospital volume on racial disparities in resected rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although high volume centers (HVC) equate to improved outcomes in rectal cancer, the impact of surgical volume related to race is less defined.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection for stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma were divided into cohorts based on race and hospital surgical volume. Outcomes were analyzed following 1:1 propensity-score matching using logistic, Poisson, and Cox regression analyses with marginal effects.

RESULTS

Fifty-four thousand one hundred and eighty-four (91.5%) non-Black and 5043 (8.5%) Black patients underwent resection of rectal cancer. Following 1:1 matching of non-Black (N = 5026) and Black patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) of Black patients was worse (72% vs. 74.4%, average marginal effects [AME] 0.66, p = 0.04) than non-Black patients. When compared to non-Black patients managed at HVCs, Black patients had worse OS (70.1% vs. 74.7%, AME 1.55, p = 0.03), but this difference was not significant when comparing OS between non-Black and Black patients managed at HVCs (72.3% vs. 74.7%, AME 0.62, p = 0.06). Length of stay was longer among Black and HVC patients across all cohorts. There was no difference across cohorts in 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although racial disparities exist in rectal cancer, this disparity appears to be ameliorated when patients are managed at HVCs.

Socioeconomic factors in timing of esophagectomy and association with outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Disparities in esophageal cancer are well-established. The standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer is chemoradiation followed by surgery. We sought to evaluate the association between socioeconomic factors, time to surgery, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

All patients ≥18 years old diagnosed with T2/3/4 or node-positive esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2016 and who underwent chemoradiation and esophagectomy in the National Cancer Database were included. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between socioeconomic variables and time to surgery (grouped into <56, 56-84, and 85-112 days).

RESULTS

A total of 12 157 patients were included. Five-year overall survival was 39%, 35%, and 35% for the three groups examined. Postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality was increased in both the 56-84 days to surgery group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30 and 1.20, respectively) and the 85-112 days group (OR: 1.37 and 1.56, respectively) when compared to <56 days. Patients of a minority race, public insurance, or lower income were more likely to have a longer time to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Longer time to surgery is associated with increased postoperative mortality and is more common in patients with lower socioeconomic status. Further research exploring reasons for delays to esophagectomy among disadvantaged patients could help target interventions to reduce disparities.

Race, Income, and Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer: CALGB 89803 (Alliance)

Background

Disparities in colon cancer outcomes have been reported across race and socioeconomic status, which may reflect, in part, access to care. We sought to assess the influences of race and median household income (MHI) on outcomes among colon cancer patients with similar access to care.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational study of 1206 stage III colon cancer patients enrolled in the CALGB 89803 randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial. Race was self-reported by 1116 White and 90 Black patients at study enrollment; MHI was determined by matching 973 patients’ home zip codes with publicly available US Census 2000 data. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for baseline sociodemographic, clinical, dietary, and lifestyle factors. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 7.7 years, the adjusted hazard ratios for Blacks (compared with Whites) were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 1.35, P = .75) for disease-free survival, 0.91 (95% CI = 0.62 to 1.35, P = .65) for recurrence-free survival, and 1.07 (95% CI = 0.73 to 1.57, P = .73) for overall survival. Relative to patients in the highest MHI quartile, the adjusted hazard ratios for patients in the lowest quartile were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.67 to 1.19, P_trend = .18) for disease-free survival, 0.89 (95% CI = 0.66 to 1.22, P_trend = .14) for recurrence-free survival, and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.19, P_trend = .23) for overall survival.

Conclusions

In this study of patients with similar health-care access, no statistically significant differences in outcomes were found by race or MHI. The substantial gaps in outcomes previously observed by race and MHI may not be rooted in differences in tumor biology but rather in access to quality care.

Ninety-day mortality after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer is associated with significant 30-day mortality, but this endpoint may underestimate the short-term mortality of the procedure.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed using the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Patients who underwent total gastrectomy for stage I to III gastric adenocarcinoma were identified and divided into cohorts based on 90-day mortality. Predictors of mortality were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, and annual trends in mortality rates were calculated by Joinpoint Regression.

RESULTS

Of the 5,484 patients who underwent total gastrectomy, 90-day and 30-day mortality rates were 9.1% and 4.7%, respectively. Factors associated with 90-day mortality included increasing age (odds ratio 1.0, P < .001), income below the median (odds ratio 1.2, P = .039), Charlson-Deyo score ≥2 (odds ratio 1.4, P = .039), treatment at low-volume facilities (odds ratio 1.5, P < .001), N1 (odds ratio 2.0, P < .001), N2 (odds ratio 2.0, P < .001), or N3 (odds ratio 2.7, P < .001) stage disease, having <16 lymph nodes harvested (odds ratio 1.5, P < .001), and lack of treatment with chemotherapy (3.7, P < .001). Lack of health insurance (odds ratio 4.1, P = .080), and positive microscopic margins (odds ratio 1.3, P = .080) were correlated, but not significantly associated, with 90-day mortality. The 90-day mortality rate significantly declined from 14.3% in 2004 to 7.9% in 2015 (P = .006), and the 30-day mortality rate significantly declined from 7.7% in 2004 to 4.8% in 2015 (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of the deaths within 90 days after total gastrectomy for cancer occur beyond 30 days postoperative. Ninety-day mortality has improved over time, but rates remain high, suggesting the need for improved out-of-hospital postoperative care beyond 30 days.

A national analysis of pediatric firearm violence and the effects of race and insurance status on risk of mortality

OBJECTIVES

To perform a national analysis of pediatric firearm violence (PFV), hypothesizing that black and uninsured patients would have higher risk of mortality.

METHODS

The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried for PFV patients ≤16 years-old. Multivariable logistic regression models on all patients and a subset excluding severe brain injuries were performed.

RESULTS

The PFV mortality rate was 11.2%. 66.5% of PFV patients were black (p < 0.001). Deceased patients were more likely to be uninsured (14.5% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001). Black race was an associated risk factor for mortality in patients without severe brain injury (OR 5.26, CI 1.00-27.47, p = 0.049) but not for the overall population (OR 1.32, CI 0.68-2.56, p = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

Nearly two-thirds of PFV patients were black. Contrary to previous studies, black and uninsured pediatric patients did not have an increased risk of mortality overall. However, in a subset of patients without severe brain injury, black race was associated with increased mortality risk.

SUMMARY

Between 2014 and 2016 the mortality rate for pediatric firearm violence (PFV) in children 16 years and younger was 11.2%. Although two-thirds of PFV patients were black, black race and lack of insurance were not risk factors of mortality for the overall population. Once patients with severe brain injury were excluded, black race and became associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Pathologic complete response is associated with decreased morbidity following rectal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data regarding the relationship between pathologic complete response (pCR) and post-operative complications following rectal cancer resection. The objective of this study was to compare the rates of morbidity among pCR patients and non-pCR patients and to identify factors that predict pCR morbidity in a large national database.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) targeted proctectomy data (2016-18). Patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by proctectomy were included, and divided into pCR and non-pCR groups according to final stage. The groups were compared with Student's t-test, Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to estimate the association between pCR status and post-operative morbidity while adjusting for key covariates.

RESULTS

244 pCR and 1656 non-pCR patients were included. pCR patients had higher body mass index (28.1 ± 6.2 vs. 29.1 ± 5.9 kg/m²; p = 0.01) and lower pre-operative stage (T stage, p = 0.03; N stage, p < 0.001). The groups were equivalent with respect to surgical approach, type of surgery, and operative time (p > 0.05). Post-operative complications in pCR patients were less frequent than in non-pCR patients (23.0% vs. 29.3%; p = 0.04). This association was robust to adjustment for confounders in logistic regression, as patients with pCR had decreased odds of post-operative morbidity (OR 0.66, CI [0.43, 0.96], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

pCR is associated with fewer post-operative complications compared to non-pCR, suggesting that pCR is not a marker of severe pelvic fibrosis. This difference may be due to underlying tumor biology, and associated increased technical challenges resecting larger, non-responsive tumors.

Do specific operative approaches and insurance status impact timely access to colorectal cancer care?

INTRODUCTION

The increased use of minimally invasive surgery in the management of colorectal cancer has led to a renewed focus on how certain factors, such as insurance status, impact the equitable distribution of both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Our goal was to analyze surgical wait times between robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches, and to determine whether insurance status impacts timely access to treatment.

METHODS

After IRB approval, adult patients from the National Cancer Database with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were identified (2010-2016). Patients who underwent radiation therapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, had wait times of 0 days from diagnosis to surgery, or had metastatic disease were excluded. Primary outcomes were days from cancer diagnosis to surgery and days from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Among 324,784 patients, 5.9% underwent robotic, 47.5% laparoscopic, and 46.7% open surgery. Patients undergoing robotic surgery incurred the longest wait times from diagnosis to surgery (29.5 days [robotic] vs. 21.7 [laparoscopic] vs. 17.2 [open], p < 0.001), but the shortest wait times from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (48.9 days [robotic] vs. 49.9 [laparoscopic] vs. 54.8 [open], p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, robotic surgery was associated with a 1.46 × longer wait time to surgery (IRR 1.462, 95% CI 1.458-1.467, p < 0.001), but decreased wait time to adjuvant chemotherapy (IRR 0.909, 95% CI 0.905-0.913, p < 0.001) compared to an open approach. Private insurance was associated with decreased wait times to surgery (IRR 0.966, 95% CI 0.962-0.969, p < 0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (IRR 0.862, 95% CI 0.858-0.865, p < 0.001) compared to Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

Though patients undergoing robotic surgery experienced delays from diagnosis to surgery, they tended to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy sooner compared to those undergoing open or laparoscopic approaches. Private insurance was independently associated not only with access to robotic surgery, but also shorter wait times during all stages of treatment.

Patient and Family Engaged Care: An Essential Element of Health Equity

In this paper, we emphasize and explore health equity as an integral component of a culture of patient and family engaged care (PFEC), rather than an isolated or peripheral outcome. To examine the role of PFEC in addressing health inequities, we build on the 2017 NAM Perspectives discussion paper "Harnessing Evidence and Experience to Change Culture: A Guiding Framework for Patient and Family Engaged Care." Informed by both scientific evidence and the lived experience of patients, their care partners, practitioners, and health system leaders, the paper by Frampton et al. introduced a novel Guiding Framework that delineates critical elements that work together to co-create a culture of PFEC, while also depicting a logical sequencing for implementation that facilitates progressive change and improvement toward the Quadruple Aim outcomes of better culture, better care, better health, and lower costs. In this paper, the authors highlight the need to integrate addressing health and health care disparities and improving health equity as core components of the framework to ensure the culture and policy changes necessary to meaningfully engage patients, health system staff, families, and communities.

Changes in Colorectal Cancer 5-Year Survival Disparities in California, 1997-2014

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality have declined with increased screening and scientific advances in treatment. However, improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes has not been equal for all groups and disparities have persisted over time.

METHODS

Data from the California Cancer Registry were used to estimate changes in 5-year colorectal cancer-specific survival over three diagnostic time periods: 1997-2002, 2003-2008, and 2009-2014. Analyses included all patients in California with colorectal cancer as a first primary malignancy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate the effect of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) on 5-year colorectal cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

On the basis of a population-based sample of 197,060 colorectal cancer cases, racial/ethnic survival disparities decreased over time among non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. For cases diagnosed 1997-2002, colorectal cancer-specific hazard rates were higher for NHB [HR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.19] and lower for Asians/Pacific Islanders (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) and Hispanics (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99) compared with NHW. In 2009-2014, colorectal cancer-specific HR for NHB was not significantly different to the rate observed for NHW (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.10). There were no changes in disparities in nSES, but increasing disparities by health insurance status.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a decrease in survival disparities over time by race/ethnicity, but a persistence of disparities by neighborhood socioeconomic status and health insurance status.

IMPACT

Further investigation into the drivers for these disparities can help direct policy and practice toward health equity for all groups.