Chronic Pain, Quality of Life and Functional Impairment After Emergency Laparotomy

Clinical importance of incisional hernia in patients resected for colorectal liver metastases: quality of life and abdominal wall symptoms

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia (IH) after open liver surgery is a well-recognized complication. The clinical importance of IH detected on computed tomography in terms of objective abdominal wall discomfort and impairment of quality of life (QoL) is less well known.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal liver metastases between 2010 and 2015 at a single center and were alive in February 2017 were asked to complete a ventral hernia pain questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (80%) completed the questionnaires. Forty-three patients (42%) developed IH. The majority (77%) of IHs were < 2.5 cm. Patients who had an IH before liver surgery developed a new IH to a greater extent (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding abdominal wall symptoms and QoL between patients with and without IH. However, about half (48%) of all patients had abdominal wall symptoms after a median follow-up of 34 months.

CONCLUSION

Radiologically detected IH after open liver surgery has low clinical importance. About half of all patients who underwent liver surgery experienced abdominal wall symptoms a long after surgery, but these symptoms were not related to IH.

Long-term impact of emergency laparotomy on health-related quality of life

PURPOSE

Emergency laparotomy can result in a range of physical and neuropsychiatric postoperative complaints, potentially impacting quality of life. This study aimed to assess the effect of emergency laparotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and how HRQoL influences the risk of readmission.

METHOD

HRQoL was assessed in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy during a 1-year period. Patients who completed the baseline HRQoL evaluation underwent a reassessment on postoperative day (POD) 30, 90, and 180. HRQoL was measured with the EQ5D index, and patients were categorized in 'high' and 'low' HRQoL. A decrease from high baseline HRQoL to low HRQoL by POD 30 was classified as 'acquired low HRQoL'.

RESULTS

All 215 patients who completed the baseline HRQoL evaluation were followed. On average, patients reported a lower mean (M) HRQoL from baseline (M = 0.876, standard deviation (SD) = 0.171) to POD 30 (M = 0.735, SD = 0.260). On POD 90, HRQoL had somewhat improved (M = 0.763, SD = 0.298), and by POD 180 HRQoL had returned to normal (M = 0.853, SD = 0.235). From the full-record population (n = 73), 20.5% acquired low HRQoL of whom 33% had not recovered by POD180. For patients with acquired low HRQoL, the risk of 180-day readmission was increased, and days alive and out of hospital within 180 days was reduced.

CONCLUSION

For most patients, HRQoL has returned to normal within 180 days after emergency laparotomy. However, patients who acquired low HRQoL after the procedure had an increased risk of long-term readmission.

Chronic postsurgical pain following gastrointestinal surgery - A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) has a great impact on quality of life and socioeconomic status. The mechanisms behind CPSP remain poorly understood, however type of surgical intervention seems to play a role. Gastrointestinal surgeries are common procedures, yet research in CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery is limited. The objective of this scoping review was to map the current literature on CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery, identifying how CPSP have been investigated, and which evidence gaps exist.

METHODS

This scoping review followed a pre-published protocol and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A search was carried out in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, Clinicaltrials.Gov, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were original studies involving adults, undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, who had a pain assessment ≥30 days postoperatively. A two-phase screening process and data charting were done by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 53 studies were included, published between 2001 and 2024, predominantly across Europe and Asia. The range of CPSP prevalence reported was 3.3%-46.1%. Only half the studies clearly defined CPSP, and the timing and manner of pain assessment varied considerably. Twenty-seven studies assessed risk factors for developing CPSP: preoperative pain and acute postoperative pain were consistently significant.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a wide consensus on CPSPs' negative impact on quality of life. CPSP following gastrointestinal surgery is prevalent and significantly impacts quality of life. Standardized definitions and methodologies to improve the comparability and reliability of the findings across studies are needed. Future research should focus on CPSP following specific surgical procedures to develop tailored prevention and treatment strategies.

Psychosocial outcomes following emergency laparotomy (POLO) study: a study protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods prospective cohort study assessing the psycho-social outcomes following emergency laparotomy in adults

INTRODUCTION

Morbidity from an emergency laparotomy (EmLap) is difficult to define and poorly understood. Morbidity is a holistic concept, reliant upon an interplay of bio-psychosocial outcomes that evolve long after discharge. To date, no previous study has explored the psychosocial outcomes following EmLap as a collective, nor their change over time. This study aims to describe the holistic morbidity following EmLap within the first year following surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a multicentre, mixed-methods prospective 12-month cohort study with two participant populations: patient participants and family caregivers (FCGs). A target of 160 adult patients who undergo EmLap and can give informed consent will be included in the patient participant group. Patient participants will be asked to complete three patient surveys, incorporating validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess bio-psychosocial outcomes (EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ5D-5L), Gastrointestinal Quality Life Index-36, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7, International Trauma Questionnaire, Caregiver Interaction Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale) in the 12 months following surgery. A subgroup of 15 patient participants will be asked to take part in two semistructured interviews at 6 and 12 months. A target of 15 associated family caregivers will be included in the FCG group. FCGs will be asked to take part in a semi-structured interview at 6 months to assess the EmLap impact on the wider support network. The primary outcome will be a change in quality of life (EQ5D-5L) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be changes in bio-psychosocial status at 3 and 12 months. Qualitative analysis will allow contextualisation of PROMS and further explore themes of EmLap morbidity. It is anticipated that the results of this study will help inform and develop standards of aftercare for future EmLap patients.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has received ethical approval (Wales REC7;12/WA/0297) and will be undertaken in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. We intend to disseminate study results in peer-reviewed journals and medical conferences, as well as a lay report to study participants.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Trials.gov NCT05281627.

Analgesia for emergency laparotomy: a systematic review

Aims/Background Poorly controlled pain is common after emergency laparotomy. It causes distress, hinders rehabilitation, and predisposes to complications: prolonged hospitalisation, persistent pain, and reduced quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the relative efficacies of pre-emptive analgesia for emergency laparotomy to inform practice. Methods We performed a search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS for comparator studies of preoperative/intraoperative interventions to control/reduce postoperative pain in adults undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) for general surgical pathologies. Exclusion criteria: surgery including non-abdominal sites; postoperative sedation and/or intubation; non-formal assessment of pain; non-English manuscripts. All manuscripts were screened by two investigators. Results We identified 2389 papers. Following handsearching and removal of duplicates, 1147 were screened. None were eligible for inclusion, with many looking at elective and/or laparoscopic surgeries. Conclusion Our findings indicate there is no evidence base for pre-emptive analgesic strategies in emergency laparotomy. This contrasts substantially with elective cohorts. Potential reasons include variation in practice, management of physiological derangement taking priority, and perceived contraindications to neuraxial techniques. We urge a review of contemporary practice, with analysis of clinical data, to generate expert consensus.

Quality of life after emergency laparotomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparotomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure that has higher post-operative morbidity and mortality than elective surgery. Previous research has identified that patients valued postoperative quality of life (QoL) more than the risk of mortality when deciding to undergo emergency surgery. Current pre-operative scoring and risk stratification systems for emergency laparotomy do not account for or provide prediction tools for post-operative QoL. This study aims to systematically review previous literature to determine post-operative QoL in patients who undergo emergency laparotomy.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify studies measuring post-operative QoL in patients who have had emergency laparotomy up to 29th April 2023. Mean QoL scores from the studies included were combined to calculate the average effect of emergency laparotomy on QoL. The primary outcome of the review was postoperative QoL after emergency laparotomy when compared with a comparator group. Secondary outcomes included the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies in the literature assessing the QoL of patients after emergency laparotomy were identified. Three studies showed that patients had improved QoL and seven showed worse QoL following emergency laparotomy. Length of time for QoL to return to baseline varied ranged from 3 to 12 months post-operatively. Length of hospital stay was identified as an independent risk factor for poorer QoL post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome reporting for patients who undergo emergency laparotomy should be expanded further to include QoL. Further work is required to investigate this and elicit factors that can improve QoL post-operatively.

Identifying Factors Associated With Code Status Changes After Emergency General Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgical emergencies are time sensitive. Identifying patients who may benefit from preoperative goals of care discussions is critical to ensuring that operative intervention aligns with the patient's values. We sought to identify patient factors associated with acute changes in a patient's goals using code status change (CSC) as proxy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of single-institution data for patients undergoing urgent laparotomy was performed. Patients were stratified based on whether a postoperative CSC occurred. Parametric, nonparametric, and regression analyses were used to identify variables associated with CSC.

RESULTS

Of 484 patients, 13.8% (n = 67) had a postoperative CSC. Patients with postoperative CSC were older (65 versus 60 years, P < 0.001). Odds of CSC were significantly higher in patients who were transferred between facilities (odds ratio [OR] 2.1), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3-4: OR 3.9, 5+: OR 6.8), and had a higher quick sequential organ failure assessment score (2: OR 5.0; 3: OR 38.7). Patients with anemia (OR 1.9) and active cancer (OR 3.0) had higher odds of CSC.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely intervention in emergency general surgery may result in high-risk interventions and subsequent complications that do not align with a patient's goals and values. Our analysis identified a subset of patients who undergo surgery and have a postoperative CSC leading to transition to comfort-focused care. In these patients, a pause in clinical momentum may help ensure operative intervention remains goal concordant.

Longitudinal study evaluating post-ICU syndrome differences between acute care surgery and trauma SICU survivors

BACKGROUND

Post-intensive care unit (ICU) syndrome (PICS) occurs at an exorbitant rate in surgical ICU (SICU) survivors. It remains unknown if critical illness due to trauma versus acute care surgery (ACS) may represent different pathophysiologic entities. In this longitudinal study, we determined if admission criteria in a cohort of trauma and ACS patients were associated with differences in the occurrence of PICS.

METHODS

Patients were 18 years or older, admitted to a Level I trauma center to the trauma or ACS services, remained in the SICU for ≥72 hours, and were seen in an ICU Recovery Center at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after hospital discharge. Post-ICU syndrome sequelae were diagnosed by dedicated specialist staffing using clinical criteria and screening questionnaires. The PICS symptoms were distilled into physical, cognitive, and psychiatric categories. Preadmission histories, hospital courses, and recovery data were collected via retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients were included: 74 (57.3%) trauma patients and 55 (42.6%) ACS patients. Prehospital psychosocial histories were similar between groups. Acute care surgery patients had a significantly longer hospital course, higher APACHE II and III scores, were intubated for longer, and had higher rates of sepsis, acute renal failure, open abdomen, and hospital readmissions. At the 2-week follow-up visit, ACS patients had higher rates of PICS sequelae (ACS, 97.8% vs. trauma 85.3%; p = 0.03), particularly in the physical (ACS, 95.6% vs. trauma 82.0%, p = 0.04), and psychiatric domains (ACS, 55.6% vs. trauma 35.0%, p = 0.04). At the 12-week and 24-week visits, rates of PICS symptoms were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of PICS is extraordinarily high in both trauma and ACS SICU survivors. Despite entering the SICU with similar psychosocial histories, the two cohorts have different pathophysiologic experiences, which are associated with a higher rate of impairment in the ACS patients during early follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Beyond high-risk: analysis of the outcomes of extreme-risk patients in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit

Patients who require emergency laparotomy are defined as high risk if their 30-day predicted risk of mortality is ≥ 5%. Despite a large difference in the characteristics of patients with a mortality risk score of between 5% and 50%, these outcomes are aggregated by the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA). Our aim was to describe the outcomes of the cohort of patients at extreme risk of death, which we defined as having a NELA-predicted 30-day mortality of ≥ 50%. All patients enrolled in the NELA database between December 2012 and 2020 were included. We compared patient characteristics; length of hospital stay; rates of unplanned return to the operating theatre; and 90-day survival in extreme-risk groups (predicted ≥ 50%) and high-risk patients (predicted 5-49%). Of 161,337 patients, 5193 (3.2%) had a predicted mortality of ≥ 50%. When patients were further subdivided, 2437 (47%) had predicted mortality of 50-59% (group 50-59); 1484 (29%) predicted mortality of 60-69% (group 60-69); 840 (16%) predicted mortality of 70-79% (group 70-79); and 423 (8%) predicted mortality of ≥ 80% (group 80+). Extreme-risk patients were significantly more likely to have been admitted electively than high-risk patients (p < 0.001). Length of stay increased from a median (IQR [range]) of 26 (16-43 [0-271]) days in group 50-59 to 35 (21-56 [0-368]) days in group 80+, compared with 17 (10-30 [0-1136]) days for high-risk patients. Rates of unplanned return to the operating theatre were higher in extreme-risk groups compared with high-risk patients (11% vs. 8%). The 90-day survival was 43% in group 50-59, 34% in group 60-69, 27% in group 70-79 and 17% in group 80+. These data underscore the need for a differentiated approach when discussing risk with patients at extreme risk of mortality following an emergency laparotomy. Clinicians should focus on patient priorities on quantity and quality of life during informed consent discussions before surgery. Future work should extend beyond the immediate postoperative period to encompass the longer-term outcomes (survival and function) of patients who have emergency laparotomies.

Getting back 'home' after emergency laparotomy: how many never make it?

BACKGROUND

Emergency laparotomy (EL) is performed on about 15 500 patients in Australia each year. Aside from mortality there is significant concern about the possibility that previously independent patients discharged after EL will become reliant on long-term dependent care. This study aimed to establish the proportion of patients not returning to their pre-admission residence, a proxy for dependent care, following EL.

METHODS

Data were collected on all adult patients who underwent EL across four Australian hospitals over 2 years. A total of 113 data points were collected including pre-hospital residence, discharge destination, mortality and place of residence at 90 and 365 days.

RESULTS

A total of 782 patients underwent EL, the mean age was 64 years. Pre-admission, 95.5% of patients were living in their own home. Inpatient mortality was 7.0% and at discharge 72.4% of patients returned directly back to their pre-hospital residence. At 90 days, mortality was 10.5%, and 87% of patients had returned to their pre-hospital residence, including all patients under 70 years of age. By 365 days, overall mortality was 16.8%, and only 1.5% of patients (all aged >70 years) had not returned to their pre-hospital residence.

CONCLUSION

Patients who survive 90 and 365 days following EL nearly all return to their pre-hospital residence, with only a very small proportion of previously independent patients entering dependent care. This should help inform shared decision-making regarding emergency laparotomy in the acute setting.

Patient-reported impact of emergency laparotomy on employment and health status 1 year after surgery

BACKGROUND

Whilst there has been significant improvement in mortality outcomes after emergency laparotomy, there is little information on longer term outcomes in the year after discharge. The main aim of the study was to assess the impact that an emergency laparotomy has on patients' and employment and health status 1 year after surgery.

METHODS

This study was a questionnaire study conducted in a single centre district general hospital of patients who had undergone an emergency laparotomy between October 2015 and December 2016. Patients were included according to the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit criteria. At screening, patients who were alive at 1 year and had the capacity to consent were approached between January and December 2017. Patients underwent a researcher-led telephone interview using a semi-structured questionnaire to assess the impact of emergency laparotomy on overall, general and physical health (Glasgow Benefit Inventory) as well as employment status. The symptoms that patients experienced and their impact were also recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients responded to and completed the questionnaire. Just over one-third of patients experienced a deterioration in their general or physical health and 21% of patients experienced a change in employment. Factors which significantly impacted on health status were stoma issues, postoperative morbidity and a change in employment (p < 0.05). The main symptoms which patients identified as being troublesome were altered bowel habit and stoma issues with a resultant social and psychological impact.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of patients experienced a deterioration in their psychosocial and physical health status as well as a change in employment during the first-year postsurgery. Larger research studies are required to define the impact of emergency laparotomy on patients in the longer term and more research is needed to improve perioperative rehabilitation in the postoperative period to ensure optimal functional gain after technically successful surgery.

Transitional Pain Medicine; New Era, New Opportunities, and New Journey

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), also known as persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP), is pain that develops or increases in intensity after a surgical procedure and lasts more than 3 months. Transitional pain medicine is the medical field that focuses on understanding the mechanisms of CPSP and defining risk factors and developing preventive treatments. Unfortunately, one significant challenge is the risk of developing opioid use dependence. Multiple risk factors have been discovered, with the most common, and modifiable, being uncontrolled acute postoperative pain; preoperative anxiety and depression; and preoperative site pain, chronic pain, and opioid use.

Risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain in visceral surgery: a matched case–control analysis

Purpose

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after abdominal visceral surgery is an underestimated long-term complication with relevant impact on health-related quality of life and socioeconomic costs. Early identification of affected patients is important. We aim to identify the incidence and risk factors for CPSP in this patient population.

Methods

Retrospective case–control matched analysis including all patients diagnosed with CPSP after visceral surgery in our institution between 2016 and 2019. One-to-two case–control matching was based on operation category (HPB, upper-GI, colorectal, transplantation, bariatric, hernia and others) and date of surgery. Potential risk factors for CPSP were identified using conditional multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Among a cohort of 3730 patients, 176 (4.7%) were diagnosed with CPSP during the study period and matched to a sample of 352 control patients. Independent risk factors for CPSP were age under 55 years (OR 2.64, CI 1.51–4.61), preexisting chronic pain of any origin (OR 3.42, CI 1.75–6.67), previous abdominal surgery (OR 1.99, CI 1.11–3.57), acute postoperative pain (OR 1.29, CI 1.16–1.44), postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR 3.73, OR 1.61–8.65), opioid use on discharge (OR 3.78, CI 2.10–6.80) and length of stay over 3 days (OR 2.60, CI 1.22–5.53). Preoperative Pregabalin intake was protective (OR 0.02, CI 0.002–0.21).

Conclusion

The incidence of CPSP is high and associated with specific risk factors, some of them modifiable. Special attention should be given to sufficient treatment of preexisting chronic pain and acute postoperative pain.

Intensive physical therapy after emergency laparotomy: Pilot phase of the Incidence of Complications following Emergency Abdominal surgery Get Exercising randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia and delayed physical recovery are significant problems after emergency laparotomy. No randomized controlled trial has assessed the feasibility, safety, or effectiveness of intensive postoperative physical therapy in this high-risk acute population.

METHODS

The internal pilot phase of the Incidence of Complications after Emergency Abdominal Surgery: Get Exercising (ICEAGE) trial was a prospective, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the feasibility, safety, and clinical trial processes of providing intensive physical therapy immediately following emergency laparotomy. Fifty consecutive patients were recruited at the principal participating hospital and randomly assigned to standard-care or intensive physical therapy of twice daily coached breathing exercises for 2 days and 30 minutes of daily supervised rehabilitation over the first 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

Interventions were provided exactly as per protocol in 35% (78 of 221 patients) of planned treatment sessions. Main barriers to protocol delivery were physical therapist unavailability on weekends (59 of 221 patients [27%]), awaiting patient consent (18 of 99 patients [18%]), and patient fatigue (26 of 221 patients [12%]). Despite inhibitors to treatment delivery, the intervention group still received twice as many breathing exercise sessions and four times the amount of physical therapy over the first 5 postoperative days (23 minutes [interquartile range, 12-29 minutes] vs. 86 minutes [interquartile range, 53-121 minutes]; p < 0.001). One adverse event was reported from 78 rehabilitation sessions (1.3%), which resolved fully on cessation of activity without escalation of medical care.

CONCLUSION

Intensive postoperative physical therapy can be delivered safely and successfully to patients in the first week after emergency laparotomy. The ICEAGE trial protocol resulted in intervention group participants receiving more coached breathing exercises and spending significantly more time physically active over the first 5 days after surgery compared with standard care. It was therefore recommended to progress into the multicenter phase of ICEAGE to definitively test the effect of intensive physical therapy to prevent pneumonia and improve physical recovery after emergency laparotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Despite the fact that emergency midline laparotomy is a risk factor for an incisional hernia, active research on hernia prevention in emergency settings is lacking. Different kinds of meshes and mesh positions have been studied in elective abdominal surgery, but no randomized controlled trials in emergency settings have been published thus far.

Method

The PREEMER trial (registration number NCT04311788) is a multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial to be conducted in six hospitals in Finland. A total of 244 patients will be randomized at a 1 : 1 ratio to either the retrorectus mesh group, featuring a self-gripping prophylactic mesh, or to the no mesh (control) group, both closed by small-stitch 4 : 1 closure with continuous slowly absorbable monofilament suturing. The primary outcome of the PREEMER trial is the incidence of incisional hernia 2 years after surgery, which will be detected clinically and/or radiologically. Secondary outcomes are the Comprehensive Complication Index score, incidence of surgical-site infections and fascial dehiscence within 30 days of surgery; the incisional hernia repair rate and mesh- or hernia-related reoperations within the 2- and 5-year follow-ups; the incidence of incisional hernia within the 5-year follow-up; and quality of life measured by RAND-36, the Activities Assessment Scale and the PROMIS questionnaire within 30 days and 2 and 5 years from surgery. Additionally, health–economic explorative measures will be explored.

Conclusion

The PREEMER trial will provide level 1 evidence on incisional hernia prevention in an emergency setting.

Registration number

NCT04311788 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Registered 7 March 2020.

Patient perceptive focus on recovery: An exploratory study on follow-up after major emergency abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Optimal recovery can be defined as the adequate in-hospital length of stay with minimal postoperative complications and readmissions. The quality of recovery beyond the immediate postoperative period after major emergency abdominal surgery is yet to be fully described. We hypothesized that long-term measures of overall recovery were affected after surgery. The study aimed to investigate patient-focused recovery-related parameters 1 year after major emergency abdominal surgery.

METHOD

This is a prospective study including patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery at a Danish secondary referral center. Three questionnaires were answered regarding the recovery following the procedure; Activities Assessment Scale (AAS); Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), and Self-complete Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS). All questionnaires were answered at postoperative days (PODs) 14, 30, 90, and 365.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included, and 68 were available for follow-up until 1 year after surgery. The response rates differed between the follow-up time points, with a response rate of 85% (n = 59) at POD30 and 50% (n = 36) at POD365. A decrease in the level of physical function following surgery was observed in 60% of the patients at POD14, which improved to 36% at POD365. Twenty-four patients (48%) reported postoperative pain at POD14, which declined to 9 (26%) at POD365. The maximum overall recovery was reached at POD30, which remained stable throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

One in three patients reported physical functional impairment, and one in four patients reported pain 1 year after their surgical procedure.

High occurrence of postintensive care syndrome identified in surgical ICU survivors after implementation of a multidisciplinary clinic

BACKGROUND

Postintensive care syndrome (PICS) has been identified in a large proportion of medical intensive care unit survivors; however, the occurrence surgical intensive care unit (SICU) survivors is unknown. We implemented a multidisciplinary critical care outpatient clinic (CCOC) to identify the occurrence of PICS in SICU survivors.

METHODS

Seventy acute care surgery and trauma patients, 18 years or older, who remained in the SICU for 72 hours or longer at a Level I trauma center were seen in CCOC at 2 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after hospital discharge. The CCOC staffing included a nurse coordinator, social worker, critical care pharmacist, physical therapist, and acute care surgeon who identified PICS sequelae in their respective specialties by clinical criteria and screening questionnaires.

RESULTS

Of 82 eligible patients, 70 (85.4%) were seen at least once for 116 total visits. Forty-three (61.4%) patients suffered traumatic injuries and 27 (38.6%) underwent emergent general surgery. Sixty-seven (95.7%) demonstrated at least one PICS criterion. Over all visits, 26 (37.1%) patients presented with one PICS criterion, 24 (34.3%) patients with two, and 17 (24.3%) with three. Cognitive impairment was observed in 29 (41.4%) patients, psychiatric in 30 (42.9%), and physical symptoms in 65 (92.9%). Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care scores improved from severe impairment at admission to full function by 12 weeks postdischarge, yet 6 Minute Walk Test scores remained below age-matched references through all visits. Patients expressed mild to moderate depression based on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores. A medication reconciliation was completed at 96.5% (112/116) of the visits with 116 total medication recommendations. By 24 weeks following discharge, only 26.4% (14/53) of previously employed patients had resumed work.

CONCLUSION

Through the successful implementation of a multidisciplinary CCOC, this study identifies an exorbitant rate of PICS among SICU survivors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/epidemiological, level III.

Prevalence and predictors of chronic postsurgical pain after colorectal surgery: A prospective study

AIM

The aim was to investigate the incidence, characteristics and the potential predictors of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after colorectal surgery.

METHOD

Patients who underwent colorectal surgery at our institution from July 2014 to December 2016 were prospectively enrolled in this study. Perioperative potential demographic, clinical and psychological predictors for CPSP were collected. The follow-up visits were conducted through telephone interviews at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The interview questionnaire comprised items regarding pain intensity, frequency, site, analgesic administration and impact on activities of daily living.

RESULTS

A total of 624 patients completed the 6-month follow-up and were included in the analysis. CPSP was reported by 32.1% of these patients at 3 months and 21.8% at 6 months after colorectal surgery. The pain interfered with several activities of daily living in a considerable proportion of CPSP cases. At 3 months, the identified predictors of CPSP were young age, preoperative abdominal pain and pain elsewhere, preoperative anxiety and depression, longer duration of surgery, and high pain intensity on movement within 24 h after surgery. Predictors of CPSP at 6 months were young age, preoperative abdominal pain, preoperative anxiety, longer duration of surgery, and high pain intensity on movement within 24 h after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Chronic pain after colorectal surgery is a common complication associated with young age, preoperative abdominal pain and pain elsewhere, preoperative anxiety and depression, longer duration of surgery, and high pain intensity on movement within 24 h after surgery.

Patient-Reported Quality of Life Following Laparotomy in a Resource-Limited Setting

INTRODUCTION

The burden of surgical diseases is high in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite limitations to surgical care access, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data following surgical intervention are scarce.

METHODS

We performed a 3-month prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing an abdominal operation. We administered the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-25 and Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living questionnaire preoperatively (to postoperative day [POD] #1), POD#7, and POD#30. PROMIS-25 HRQoL domains were measured and converted to standardized T-scores (median 50, minimal important clinical difference 3).

RESULTS

Of the 117 laparotomy patients who were enrolled, 89 (76.1%) were male with a median age of 39 years (IQR 27-54). Operations were primarily for intestinal volvulus (n = 30, 28.3%) and intestinal perforation (n = 29, 27.4%). We completed a total of 80 (68.4%), 95 (81.2%), and 77 (65.8%) surveys preoperatively, at POD#7, and POD#30, respectively. Preoperatively patients showed high median levels of anxiety (56), depression (60), fatigue (63), and pain interference (62), which all improved postoperatively. Mobility was poor preoperatively (31) and showed improvement during recovery but remained poor [POD#7: 32, POD#30: 39]. Pain intensity was high (10/10) preoperatively and improved to 3/10 by POD#30. Patients with complications compared to those without had clinically significant worse HRQoL in all domains measured by POD#30.

DISCUSSION

Abdominal surgery patients in a resource-limited setting present with poor HRQoL, which improves postoperatively. Mobility remained poor throughout follow-up despite improved pain scores. Our findings highlight the need for improved HRQoL and pain control among surgical patients.