Results of Duodenopancreatic Reoperations in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

Neuroendocrine Tumors and Survival Rates in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Patients: Impact of Gender Difference

INTRODUCTION

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is the most common inherited syndrome associated with NET development and gender-specific differences are emerging in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to analyze gender difference in a single cohort of MEN-1 patients focusing on duodeno-pancreatic (DP)-NET and survival rates.

METHODS

MEN-1 patients referred to the Endocrinology Unit of the "Federico II" University of Naples, ENETS CoE, were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 100 MEN-1 patients enrolled, 59 (59%) were female and 41 (41%) male, and mean age at diagnosis was 39.4 years (range 5-86). No statistically significant association was identified between MEN-1 clinical manifestations and gender (primary hyperparathyroidism [PHPT] p: 1.0, DP-NET p: 0.83, pituitary adenoma [PA] p: 0.84, lung NET p: 0.64, and thymic NET p: 0.10), and similarly, age at diagnosis of MEN-1 and its individual manifestations was similar between genders. Survival analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between genders in DP-NET patients regarding progression disease p: 1.0 and death p: 1.0. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with DP-NET was 98.6 months (range 3-288), and mean overall survival (OS) was 130.1 months (range 3-444 months), without differences between genders (PFS p: 0.67 and OS p: 0.60). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for PFS and OS showed no differences between genders (PFS p: 0.92; OS p: 0.87).

CONCLUSION

In this MEN-1 cohort, no gender differences in the occurrence of PHPT, PA, DP-NET, lung NET, and thymic NET, nor in survival outcomes including PFS and OS within the DP-NET subcohort, emerged. Therefore, this study supports similar screening and follow-up for both male and female MEN-1 patients.

[Individualized approach for MEN1-associated duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]

BACKGROUND

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-associated duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (dpNEN) represent the most frequent syndrome-associated cause of death, but the adequate treatment is sometimes considered controversial.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of possible diagnostic and therapeutic options for MEN1-associated dpNENs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this review article retrospective case studies, expert recommendations, national and international guidelines as well as personal experiences were analyzed and evaluated.

RESULTS

Due to early detection programs and the use of the most modern imaging techniques, dpNEN are nowadays diagnosed much earlier. Nonfunctional pNENs currently represent the most frequent dpNENs with about 70%, followed by gastrinomas and insulinomas. Regardless of their functional activity, dpNENs with a size of > 2 cm are generally an indication for surgery. The choice of the optimal treatment strategy, however, in most cases remains the subject of controversial discussions, although nowadays surgery should always be performed in an organ-preserving and minimally invasive way when feasible. Recurrences or new dpNENs are expected in more than 60% of cases, necessitating a reoperation in up to 40% of these cases. Duodenopancreatic resections and reoperations can be carried out safely by experienced practitioners and with an acceptable level of risk.

CONCLUSION

The planning of treatment requires careful consideration of the suitable timing, the extent of the operation, the risk of recurrence and potential morbidities. Furthermore, preserving pancreatic function and the quality of life is of utmost importance. In view of the complexity of the disease, MEN1 patients should be treated in specialized centers.

Completion Pancreatectomy. Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE (S)

Completion pancreatectomy (C.P.) is one acceptable treatment of choice in clinical scenarios such as management of post-pancreatectomy complications and recurrence in the pancreatic remnant. Studies referring to completion pancreatectomy as a distinct operation are limited, without emphasizing at the operation itself, rather reporting completion pancreatectomy as a possible option for treatment of various diseases. The identification of indications of CP in various pathologies and the clinical outcomes are therefore mandatory.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the Pubmed and Scopus Databases (February 2020),guided by the PRISMA protocol, for all studies reporting CP as a surgical procedure with reference at indications for performing it combined with postoperative morbidity and/or mortality.

RESULTS

Out of 1647 studies, 32 studies from 10 countries with 2775 patients in total, of whom 561 (20.2%) CPs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Inclusion year ranged from 1964 to 2018 and were published from 1992 until 2019. 17 studies with a total number of 249 CPs were performed for post-pancreatectomy complications. Mortality rate was 44.5% (111 out of 249). Morbidity rate was (72.6%). 12 studies with 225 CPs were performed for isolated local recurrence after initial resection with a morbidity rate of 21.5% and 0% mortality rate in the early postoperative period. Two studies with a total number of 12 patients reported CP as a treatment option for recurrent neuroendocrine neoplasms. The mortality in those studies was 8% (1/12) and the mean morbidity rate was 58.3% (7/12). Finally, CP for refractory chronic pancreatitis was presented in one study with morbidity and mortality rates of 19% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Completion pancreatectomy is a distinct treatment option for various pathologies. Morbidity and mortality rates depend on the indications of performing CP, the status performance of the patients and whether the operation is performed electively or urgently.

[Indication and Surgical Procedures for MEN1-associated Duodenopancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms]

The optimal therapy of duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (dpNEN), which occurs in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, is still a major challenge and is controversial. Due to the rarity of the disease, there is a lack of prospective randomised studies, so that most recommendations regarding the surgical indication and procedure are based on retrospective case series. In summary, surgical therapy is indicated for non-functional dpNEN > 2 cm, suspected malignancy and functionally active dpNEN. Enucleation or formal pancreatic resections with or without lymphadenectomy may be considered. The aim of therapy should be to eliminate hormone-associated symptoms and prevent an aggressive metastatic disease. At the same time, pancreatic function and quality of life should be preserved in the mostly young patients by resections that save as much parenchyma as possible.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society 2023 guidance paper for functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour syndromes

This ENETS guidance paper aims to provide practical advice to clinicians for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of functioning syndromes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). A NET-associated functioning syndrome is defined by the presence of a clinical syndrome combined with biochemical evidence of inappropriately elevated hormonal levels. Different hormonal syndromes can be encountered in pancreatic NET patients, including insulinoma, gastrinoma as well as the rare glucagonoma, VIPoma, ACTHoma, PTHrPoma, carcinoid syndrome, calcitoninoma, GHRHoma and somatostatinoma. The recommendations provided in this paper focus on the biochemical, genetic and imaging work-up as well as therapeutic management of the individual hormonal syndromes in well-differentiated, grade 1-3, functioning NET with the primary tumour originating in the pancreas, and for specific subtypes also in the duodenum.

Imaging surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: Ten years of experience with somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography

Guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) recommend intensive imaging surveillance without specifying a superior regimen, including the role of somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) with positron emission tomography (PET). The primary outcomes were to: (1) Assess change in treatment of duodenal-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (DP-NENs), bronchopulmonary NENs, and thymic tumors attributed to use of SRI PET/computed tomography (CT) and (2) estimate radiation from imaging and risk of cancer death attributed to imaging radiation. This was a retrospective single center study, including all MEN1 patients, who had had at least one SRI PET/CT. A total of 60 patients, median age 42 (range 21-54) years, median follow-up 6 (range 1-10) years were included. Of 470 cross sectional scans (MRI, CT, SRI PET/CT), 209 were SRI PET/CT. The additional information from SRI PET had implications in 1/14 surgical interventions and 2/12 medical interventions. The estimated median radiation dose per patient was 104 (range 51-468) mSv of which PET contributed with 13 (range 5-55) mSv and CT with 91 mSv (range 46-413 mSv), corresponding to an estimated increased median risk of cancer death of 0.5% during 6 years follow-up. SRI PET had a significant impact on 3/26 decisions to intervene in 60 MEN1 patients followed for a median of 6 years with SRI PET/CT as the most frequently used modality. The surveillance program showed a high radiation dose. Multi-modality imaging strategies designed to minimize radiation exposure should be considered. Based on our findings, SRI-PET combined with CT cannot be recommended for routine surveillance in MEN1 patients.

Clinical features and postoperative survival in patients with sporadic versus multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: An international cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is controversial. This study sought to compare clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated and sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from a large multi-national database.

METHODS

A multi-institutional, international database of patients with surgically resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors was analyzed. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: those with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 versus those with sporadic disease. Clinicopathologic comparisons were made. Overall and disease-free survival were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to reduce bias.

RESULTS

Of 651 patients included, 45 (6.9%) had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and 606 sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were more common in younger patients and associated with multifocal disease at the time of surgery and higher T-stage. Lymph node involvement and the presence of metastasis were similar. Total pancreatectomy rate was 5-fold higher in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 cohort. Median survival did not differ (disease-free survival 126 months multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 vs 198 months sporadic, P > .5). After matching, survival remained similar (overall survival not reached in either cohort, disease-free survival 126 months multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 vs 198 months sporadic, P > .5). Equivalence in overall survival and disease-free survival persisted even when patients who underwent subtotal and total pancreatectomy were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are more common in younger patients and are associated with multifocality and higher T-stage. Survival for patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is comparable to those with sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, even in the absence of radical pancreatectomy. Consideration should be given to parenchymal-sparing surgery to preserve pancreatic function.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Best Surgical Procedure for Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome Associated with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1

Simple Summary

Approximately 30% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) develop the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (ZES), caused by solitary or multiple duodenal gastrinomas. Its management, especially regarding indication, timing, and type of surgery, is highly controversial. Therefore, the present study evaluated the long-term outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) versus non-PD resections in MEN1-ZES with regard to biochemical cure and quality of life. We found in a series of 35 patients that initial PD is the superior surgical procedure for MEN1-ZES, leading to long-term cure in about 80% of patients, fewer duodenopancreatic reoperations and an acceptable quality of life. Based on the results of this study, MEN1-ZES should be considered a surgically curable disease.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the long-term outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) versus other duodenopancreatic resections (non-PD) for the surgical treatment of the Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (ZES) in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Methods: Prospectively recorded patients with biochemically confirmed MEN1-ZES who underwent duodenopancreatic surgery were retrospectively analyzed in terms of clinical characteristics, complications, cure rate, and long-term morbidity, including quality of life assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30). Results: 35 patients (16 female, 19 male) with MEN1-ZES due to duodenopancreatic gastrinomas with a median age of 42 (range 30–74) years were included. At the time of diagnosis, 28 (80%) gastrinomas were malignant, but distant metastases were only present in one (3%) patient. Eleven patients (31.4%) underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) as the initial procedure, whereas 24 patients underwent non-PD resections involving duodenotomy with gastrinoma excision, enucleation of the pNEN from the head of the pancreas, and peripancreatic lymphadenectomy, either with or without distal pancreatectomy (i.e., either Thompson procedure, n = 12, or DUODX, n = 12). There was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups (p ≥ 0.05). One (9%) patient of the PD group required reoperation for recurrent or metastatic ZES compared to eight (22.8%) patients of the non-PD resection groups. After a median follow-up time of 134 months (range 6–480) nine of 11 (82%) patients in the PD group, two of 12 (16%) patients in the Thompson procedure group, and three of 12 (25%) patients in the DUODX group had normal serum gastrin levels. In addition, the global health QoLScore was better in the PD group (76.9) compared to the Thompson procedure (57.4) and DUODX (59.5) groups. Conclusions: Initial PD seems to be the superior surgical procedure for MEN1-ZES, resulting in a long-term cure rate of about 80%, fewer duodenopancreatic reoperations, and an acceptable quality of life.

What Are the Place and Modalities of Surgical Management for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? A Narrative Review

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors derived from cells with neuroendocrine differentiation. They are considered malignant by default. However, their outcomes are variable depending on their presentation in the onset of hereditary syndromes, hormonal secretion, grading, and extension. Therefore, although surgical treatment has long been suggested as the only treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, its modalities are an evolving landscape. For selected patients (small, localized, non-functional panNENs), a "wait and see" strategy is suggested, as it is in the setting of multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1, but the accurate size cut-off remains to be established. Parenchyma-sparring pancreatectomy, aiming to limit pancreatic insufficiency, are also emerging procedures, which place beyond the treatment of insulinomas and small non-functional panNENs (in association with lymph node picking) remains to be clarified. Furthermore, giving the fact that the liver is generally the only metastatic site, surgery keeps a place of choice alongside medical therapies in the treatment of metastatic disease, but its modalities and extensions are still a matter of debate. This narrative review aims to describe the current recommended surgical management for pancreatic NENs and controversies in light of the actual recommendations and recent literature.

JNETS clinical practice guidelines for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up: a synopsis

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare neoplasms that occur in various organs and present with diverse clinical manifestations. Pathological classification is important in the diagnosis of NENs. Treatment strategies must be selected according to the status of differentiation and malignancy by accurately determining whether the neoplasm is functioning or nonfunctioning, degree of disease progression, and presence of metastasis. The newly revised Clinical Practice Guidelines for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs) comprises 5 chapters-diagnosis, pathology, surgical treatment, medical and multidisciplinary treatment, and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)/von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-and includes 51 clinical questions and 19 columns. These guidelines aim to provide direction and practical clinical content for the management of GEP-NEN preferentially based on clinically useful reports. These revised guidelines also refer to the new concept of "neuroendocrine tumor" (NET) grade 3, which is based on the 2017 and 2019 WHO criteria; this includes health insurance coverage of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for NEN, everolimus for lung and gastrointestinal NET, and lanreotide for GEP-NET. The guidelines also newly refer to the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of NEN associated with VHL disease and MEN1. The accuracy of these guidelines has been improved by examining and adopting new evidence obtained after the first edition was published.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and the Pancreas: Diagnosis and Treatment of Functioning and Non-Functioning Pancreatic and Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasia within the MEN1 Syndrome - An International Consensus Statement

The better understanding of the biological behavior of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) organ manifestations and the increase in clinical experience warrant a revision of previously published guidelines. Duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (DP-NENs) are still the second most common manifestation in MEN1 and, besides NENs of the thymus, remain a leading cause of death. DP-NENs are thus of main interest in the effort to reevaluate recommendations for their diagnosis and treatment. Especially over the last 2 years, more clinical experience has documented the follow-up of treated and untreated (natural-course) DP-NENs. It was the aim of the international consortium of experts in endocrinology, genetics, radiology, surgery, gastroenterology, and oncology to systematically review the literature and to present a consensus statement based on the highest levels of evidence. Reviewing the literature published over the past decade, the focus was on the diagnosis of F- and NF-DP-NENs within the MEN1 syndrome in an effort to further standardize and improve treatment and follow-up, as well as to establish a "logbook" for the diagnosis and treatment of DP-NENs. This shall help further reduce complications and improve long-term treatment results in these rare tumors. The following international consensus statement builds upon the previously published guidelines of 2001 and 2012 and attempts to supplement the recommendations issued by various national and international societies.

Gender Differences in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Implications for Screening?

BACKGROUND

Some gender-related differences have been reported in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), although not all reports are conclusive. This systematic review with analysis of the own MEN1 cohort evaluates gender differences and potential consequences for screening.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature between 1990 and 2019 with the search terms "MEN1" or "multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1" and "gender" or "sex" was performed. In addition, the prospectively collected data of a genetically confirmed MEN1 cohort of the Philipps University Marburg were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Review of the literature identified five retrospective case series with original data of 1,057 MEN1 patients. One series suggested a higher frequency of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), especially gastrinomas, in men (61 vs. 54%) and a higher frequency of pituitary tumors in women (47 vs. 30%), but others did not. Only thymic NEN occurred predominantly in men throughout all studies. Women with MEN1 were found to have an increased risk of breast cancer. In the own series consisting of 116 MEN1 patients (male = 58, female = 58), thymic lesions were also more frequently detected in male patients (male = 5, female = 1). No gender difference was found with regard to the other manifestations.

CONCLUSION

Regarding the typical MEN1 tumor manifestations, gender-adapted diagnostic and therapeutic approaches cannot be recommended. Female MEN1 patients should be encouraged to participate in breast cancer screening programs.

Contemporary surgical management of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

About 30% of patients with MEN1 develop a Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Meanwhile it is well established that the causative gastrinomas are almost exclusively localized in the duodenum and not in the pancreas, MEN1 gastrinomas occur multicentric and are associated with hyperplastic gastrin cell lesions and tiny gastrin-producing micro tumors in contrast to sporadic duodenal gastrinomas. Regardless of the high prevalence of early lymphatic metastases, the survival is generally good with an aggressive course of disease in only about 20% of patients. Symptoms can be controlled medically. The indication, timing, type, and extent of surgery are highly controversial and are discussed in detail in this article by a thorough and critical review of literature. More radical procedures, like partial pancreaticoduodenectomy, are weighed against less aggressive local excision of gastrinomas and the pros and cons of both approaches are discussed in terms of long-term morbidity, biochemical cure, and survival.

Surgical management of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: Classical considerations and current controversies

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion causing severe recurrent acid-related peptic disease. Excessive secretion of gastrin can now be effectively controlled with powerful proton pump inhibitors, but surgical management to control gastrinoma itself remains controversial. Based on a thorough literature review, we design a surgical algorithm for ZES and list some significant consensus findings and recommendations: (1) For sporadic ZES, surgery should be routinely undertaken as early as possible not only for patients with a precisely localized diagnosis but also for those with negative imaging findings. The surgical approach for sporadic ZES depends on the lesion location (including the duodenum, pancreas, lymph nodes, hepatobiliary tract, stomach, and some extremely rare sites such as the ovaries, heart, omentum, and jejunum). Intraoperative liver exploration and lymphadenectomy should be routinely performed; (2) For multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-related ZES (MEN1/ZES), surgery should not be performed routinely except for lesions > 2 cm. An attempt to perform radical resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy followed by lymphadenectomy) can be made. The ameliorating effect of parathyroid surgery should be considered, and parathyroidectomy should be performed first before any abdominal surgery for ZES; and (3) For hepatic metastatic disease, hepatic resection should be routinely performed. Currently, liver transplantation is still considered an investigational therapeutic approach for ZES. Well-designed prospective studies are desperately needed to further verify and modify the current considerations.