Gender Differences in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: Implications for Screening?

The Spectrum of Familial Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Hereditary pituitary tumorigenesis is seen in a relatively small proportion (around 5%) of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). The aim of the current review is to describe the main clinical and molecular features of such pituitary tumors associated with hereditary or familial characteristics, many of which have now been genetically identified. The genetic patterns of inheritance are classified into isolated familial PitNETs and the syndromic tumors. In general, the established genetic causes of familial tumorigenesis tend to present at a younger age, often pursue a more aggressive course, and are more frequently associated with growth hormone hypersecretion compared to sporadic tumors. The mostly studied molecular pathways implicated are the protein kinase A and phosphatidyl-inositol pathways, which are in the main related to mutations in the syndromes of familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA), Carney complex syndrome, and X-linked acrogigantism. Another well-documented mechanism consists of the regulation of p27 or p21 proteins, with further acceleration of the pituitary cell cycle through the check points G1/S and M/G1, mostly documented in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4. In conclusion, PitNETs may occur in relation to well-established familial germline mutations which may determine the clinical phenotype and the response to treatment, and may require family screening.

Beyond the "3 Ps": A critical appraisal of the non-endocrine manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), an autosomal-dominantly inherited tumor syndrome, is classically defined by tumors arising from the "3 Ps": Parathyroids, Pituitary, and the endocrine Pancreas. From its earliest descriptions, MEN1 has been associated with other endocrine and non-endocrine neoplastic manifestations. High quality evidence supports a direct association between pathogenic MEN1 variants and neoplasms of the skin (angiofibromas and collagenomas), adipose tissue (lipomas and hibernomas), and smooth muscle (leiomyomas). Although CNS tumors, melanoma, and, most recently, breast cancer have been reported as MEN1 clinical manifestations, the published evidence to date is not yet sufficient to establish causality. Well-designed, multicenter prospective studies will help us to understand better the relationship of these tumors to MEN1, in addition to verifying the true prevalence and penetrance of the well-documented neoplastic associations. Nevertheless, patients affected by MEN1 should be aware of these non-endocrine manifestations, and providers should be encouraged always to think beyond the "3 Ps" when treating an MEN1 patient.

A narrative review of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes: genetics, clinical features, imaging findings, and diagnosis

Objective

We aimed to provide ideas for clinicians, especially radiologists, for the diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes.

Background

MEN syndromes include MEN1, MEN2, and MEN4 and usually involve 2 or more endocrine tumors. The MEN syndromes are a group of euchromatic dominant genetic diseases, and the main genes involved include MEN1 (MEN1), RET (MEN2), and CDKN1B (MEN4).

Methods

In this article, involving 8 cases (4 cases of MEN1, 2 cases of MEN2A, 1 case of MEN2B, 1 case of MEN4) from our center, we introduced the disease spectrum, clinical manifestations (especially imaging findings), and related genes involved in each type of MEN syndromes. We also discussed the differential diagnosis between MEN and sporadic tumors and emphasized that MEN should be screened and the relevant required examinations.

Conclusions

Considering that MEN syndromes involve multiple endocrine gland tumors and nonendocrine organ diseases, it is very important to identify potential patients early and perform multiple examinations on them, including biochemical and multitype, and multisite imaging examinations according to the disease spectrum of each type. Considering that this is a group of genetic diseases, both interviewing patients about their family history and genetic testing are also very important. Only in this way can a comprehensive and accurate diagnosis be made, enabling patients to receive appropriate treatment and improve their prognosis.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 and the Pancreas: Diagnosis and Treatment of Functioning and Non-Functioning Pancreatic and Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasia within the MEN1 Syndrome - An International Consensus Statement

The better understanding of the biological behavior of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) organ manifestations and the increase in clinical experience warrant a revision of previously published guidelines. Duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (DP-NENs) are still the second most common manifestation in MEN1 and, besides NENs of the thymus, remain a leading cause of death. DP-NENs are thus of main interest in the effort to reevaluate recommendations for their diagnosis and treatment. Especially over the last 2 years, more clinical experience has documented the follow-up of treated and untreated (natural-course) DP-NENs. It was the aim of the international consortium of experts in endocrinology, genetics, radiology, surgery, gastroenterology, and oncology to systematically review the literature and to present a consensus statement based on the highest levels of evidence. Reviewing the literature published over the past decade, the focus was on the diagnosis of F- and NF-DP-NENs within the MEN1 syndrome in an effort to further standardize and improve treatment and follow-up, as well as to establish a "logbook" for the diagnosis and treatment of DP-NENs. This shall help further reduce complications and improve long-term treatment results in these rare tumors. The following international consensus statement builds upon the previously published guidelines of 2001 and 2012 and attempts to supplement the recommendations issued by various national and international societies.

Hereditary Parathyroid Disease: Sometimes Pathologists Do Not Know What They Are Missing

Parathyroid gland excision specimens are common and sometimes underestimated cases that many surgical pathologists encounter regularly. In the vast majority of cases, these will be spot diagnoses of sporadic primary parathyroid adenomas or, perhaps, hyperplasias commonly in the setting of renal failure. However, a small but significant number of parathyroid gland excisions may be due to heritable disease. In most cases, hereditary disease is suspected by the referring clinicians. Nevertheless, a subset of these are undetected which is significant, particularly in the setting of the multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN), and the hyperparathyroidism jaw tumour (HPT-JT) syndromes. There have been recent advances in recognition of the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of these tumours and hyperplasias. While hereditary kindreds are over-represented at specialist referral centres, with awareness of the characteristic clinical and morphological features, the general surgical pathologist is frequently able to suggest the possibility of hereditary parathyroid disease. We therefore provide a succinct guide for pathologists to increase the recognition of hereditary parathyroid disease.