Treatment of neuroendocrine cancer metastatic to the liver: the role of ablative techniques

[Radiologically guided interventional therapies for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors]

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) develop liver metastases during the course of the disease, significantly impacting prognosis and quality of life.

CLINICAL ISSUE

Radiologically guided interventional therapies, such as thermal ablation, transarterial embolization (TAE)/chemoembolization (TACE), and selective internal radiotherapy (TARE), can play a crucial role in the treatment of metastatic NET.

DATA

Due to the rarity of the disease, the majority of evidence is based on retrospective studies. For thermal ablation, the complete response rates ranging from 31.6 to 95.3% depending on the study. No significant differences in outcomes were found between TAE, TACE, and TARE. In several studies, all intra-arterial procedures led to a reduction of tumor-related symptoms and achieved disease control.

CONCLUSION

Thermal ablation can be used as a curative therapy in oligometastatic patients with nonresectable liver metastases from NETs. In cases of disseminated liver metastases, intra-arterial therapy using TAE, TACE, or TARE can be employed.

Role of ablation therapy in conjunction with surgical resection for neuroendocrine tumors involving the liver

BACKGROUND

Resection of hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) improves quality of life and prolongs 5-year survival. Ablation can be utilized with surgery to achieve complete resection. Although several studies report long-term outcomes for patients undergoing ablation, none have explored perioperative effects of ablation in patients with metastatic NETs.

AIM

To determine if intra-operative ablation during hepatectomy increases risk of adverse outcomes such as surgical site infections (SSIs), bleeding, and bile leak.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the hepatectomy National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2015-2019 was performed to determine the odds of SSIs, bile leaks, or bleeding in patients undergoing intraoperative ablation when compared to hepatectomy alone.

RESULTS

Of the 966 patients included in the study, 298 (30.9%) underwent ablation during hepatectomy. There were 78 (11.7%) patients with SSIs in the hepatectomy alone group and 39 (13.1%) patients with a SSIs in the hepatectomy with ablation group. Bile leak occurred in 41 (6.2%) and 14 (4.8%) patients in the two groups, respectively; bleeding occurred in 117 (17.5%) and 33 (11.1%), respectively. After controlling for confounding variables, ablation did not increase risk of SSI (P = 0.63), bile leak (P = 0.34) or bleeding (P = 0.07) when compared to patients undergoing resection alone on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative ablation with hepatic resection for NETs is safe in the perioperative period without significant increased risk of infection, bleeding, or bile leak. Surgeons should utilize this modality when appropriate to achieve optimal disease control and outcomes.

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies

Management of hepatic malignancies is a multidisciplinary task with the involvement of hepatologists, medical/surgical/radiation oncologists, transplant surgeons, and interventional radiologists. Patients should be selected for a specific targeted therapy after multidisciplinary consensus. Interventional oncology, with image-guided locoregional cancer therapies, can decrease systemic toxicity without compromising tumoricidal effect.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Management of Liver Cancer: 2022 Update

The treatment and management of hepatic malignancies can be complex because it encompasses a variety of primary and metastatic malignancies and an assortment of local and systemic treatment options. When to use each of these treatments is critical to ensure the most appropriate care for patients. Interventional radiologists have a key role to play in the delivery of a variety of liver directed treatments including percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization with bland embolic particles alone, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with injection of a chemotherapeutic emulsion, and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Based on 9 clinical variants, the appropriateness of each treatment is described in this document. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Aggressive local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma—Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as a valuable addition to hepatic resection

Background

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall clinical outcome of local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2019 72 consecutive patients underwent hepatic resection for primary intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. If amenable, recurrent tumors were aggressively treated by HR or stereotactic radiofrequency ablation with local curative intent. Endpoints consisted of morbidity and mortality, locoregional and de novo recurrence, disease free survival, and overall survival.

Results

After a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma was observed in 43 of 72 patients undergoing hepatic resection (60.3%). 16 patients were subsequently treated by hepatic resection (n = 5) and stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (n = 11) with local curative intention. The remaining 27 patients underwent palliative treatment for first recurrence. Overall survival of patients who underwent repeated aggressive liver-directed therapy was comparable to patients without recurrence (p = 0.938) and was better as compared to patients receiving palliative treatment (p = 0.018). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without recurrence, the repeated liver-directed treatment group and the palliative treatment group were 54.3%, 47.7% and 12.3%, respectively. By adding stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment option, the rate of curative re-treatment increased from 11.9% to 37.2%.

Conclusion

Repeated hepatic resection is often precluded due to patient morbidity or anatomical and functional limitations. Due to the application of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation in case of recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, the number of patients treated with curative intent can be increased. This leads to favorable clinical outcome as compared to palliative treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma recurrence.

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour with multiple liver metastases: A case report with literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

To describe an unusual case with a primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumour (PHNET) with multiple liver metastases.

CASE PRESENTATION

We reported a 65-year-old woman with PHNET with multiple liver metastases. She was highly suspected of having primary liver cancer with multiple intrahepatic metastases before liver biopsy, but was diagnosed with PHNET with multiple liver metastases after histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) examinations. The patient successfully underwent three times of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and is currently living in a good state without related complications.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), also known as carcinoids or argyrophilic tumors, are very rare malignant tumors. The liver is the main metastasis site of NETs, but primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors (PHNETs) are extremely rare. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) examinations are still the main methods used for diagnosing NETs. There are no treatment guidelines for PHNETs, and surgical resection is generally the preferred treatment. For PHNET patients who are not suitable for surgery, TACE has been proven to be an effective alternative treatment that can effectively reduce the tumour burden and relieve symptoms, but the current evidence is still limited.

CONCLUSION

The clinical diagnosis of PHNET still faces great challenges, imaging examinations often lead to misdiagnosis, and its diagnosis mainly depends on histopathology and immunohistochemical examinations. For PHNET patients who are not suitable for surgery, TACE may be an effective alternative therapy.

Liver metastases in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours - treatment methods

Surgical approaches that allow the safe treatment of multiple, bilateral, large tumours, and that combine extirpative, ablative and interventional therapies, have expanded the population of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) liver metastases (LMs) who can benefit from aggressive treatment of their liver disease. Pre-treatment staging often includes the biochemical assessment of serologic markers such as serotonin, insulin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and chromogranin, even in patients without clinically apparent hormonal excess. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a technique that involves the use of thermal energy to induce coagulation necrosis, thereby destroying tumour cells. Resection plus RFA is increasingly used in patients with bilateral NET LMs. Resection is performed for large or dominant lesions, while ablation is used to treat small lesions. Hepatic arterial embolization, typically termed transarterial embolization, and transarterial chemoembolization have been shown to induce a reduction in tumour size and to ameliorate symptoms of excess hormonal secretion.

Thermal ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Safety, efficacy, and factors affecting local tumor progression

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and identify risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of an institutional tumor ablation registry demonstrated that 20 patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age 62.5 ± 15.8 years) with 50 ICCs (mean size 1.8 ± 1.3 cm) were treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) between 2006 and 2015. Thirty-eight of the treated ICCs (76%) were metastases that developed after surgical resection of the primary tumor. Patient demographics, procedure technical parameters, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the risk of LTP by ablation modality. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Mean imaging follow-up time was 41.5 ± 42.7 months. Forty-four (88%) ICCs were treated with RFA, and 6 (12%) with MWA. Eleven (22%) cases of LTP developed in 5 (25%) patients. The median time to LTP among these 11 tumors was 7.1 months (range, 2.3-22.9 months). Risk of LTP was not significantly different for ICCs treated with MWA compared to RFA (HR 2.72; 95% CI 0.58-12.84; p = 03.21). Median disease-free survival was 8.2 months (1.1-70.4 months), and median overall survival was 23.6 months (7.4-122.5 months). No major complication occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with ICCs and may be particularly valuable in unresectable patients, or those who have already undergone hepatic surgery. Tumor size and ablation modality were not associated with LTP, whereas primary tumors and superficially located tumors were more likely to subsequently recur.

Imaging presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (P-NENs) are the second most common solid pancreatic neoplasms. P-NENs have a wide range of imaging features presentations and they can be detected with typical and atypical imaging presentations. Typical and atypical appearances can be explained by pathologic correlations. P-NENs are generally hypervascular lesions, showing a typical enhancement behavior after contrast media injection during imaging methods, but they could also have different imaging features, creating some difficulty in differential diagnosis. For this reason, radiologists should be aware of different imaging presentations of these neoplasms. Radiological evaluation has a critical role in P-NENs identification, characterization, and staging of these neoplasms, especially in those cases in which surgery is the treatment of choice. The present paper shows, indicating the underlying pathologic correlations, typical and atypical presentations of NENs.

Key Points

• P-NENs have a wide range of imaging features presentations, typical and atypical.

• Pathology could help in better understanding the typical P-NENs appearance at imaging.

• P-NENs are generally hypervascular lesions.

• Radiological evaluation has a critical role in P-NENs identification and management.

• Radiologists should know every type of different imaging presentation of P-NENs to better diagnose these kinds of lesions.

CT evaluation of response in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with long-acting-repeatable octreotide: what is the optimal size variation threshold?

OBJECTIVE

To identify a reliable early indicator of deriving progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) treated with octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR).

METHODS

We investigated the images of 50 patients with well-differentiated advanced GEP-NETs treated with LAR octreotide and underwent baseline and follow-up thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic computed tomography. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify the optimal threshold to distinguish between those with and without significant improvement of PFS.

RESULTS

The optimal threshold for determining a response to octreotide LAR was -10% ΔSLD, with a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 80%, respectively. At this threshold, 19 patients were responders and 31 were non-responders; the median PFS was 20.2 and 7.6 months in responders and non-responders (hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-5.36).

CONCLUSION

A 10% shrinkage in tumor size is an optimal early predictor of response to octreotide LAR in advanced GEP-NETs.

KEY POINTS

• Octreotide LAR can significantly prolong PFS among patients with well-differentiated advanced GEP-NETs. • No optimal tumor size-based response criteria are reported in GEP-NETs with octreotide. • Ten percent tumor shrinkage is a reliable indicator of the response to octreotide for advanced GEP-NETs.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Radiologic Management of Hepatic Malignancy

Management of primary and secondary hepatic malignancy is a complex problem. Achieving optimal care for this challenging population often requires the involvement of multiple medical and surgical disciplines. Because of the wide variety of potential therapies, treatment protocols for various malignancies continue to evolve. Consequently, development of appropriate therapeutic algorithms necessitates consideration of medical options, such as systemic chemotherapy; surgical options, such as resection or transplantation; and loco-regional therapies, such as thermal ablation and transarterial embolization techniques. This article provides a review of treatment strategies for the three most common subtypes of hepatic malignancy treated with loco-regional therapies: hepatocellular carcinoma, neuroendocrine metastases, and colorectal metastases. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Locoregional Therapies for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies

Management of hepatic malignancies is a multidisciplinary task with the involvement of hepatologists, medical/surgical oncologists, transplant surgeons, and interventional radiologists. The patients should be selected for a specific targeted therapy after multidisciplinary consensus. Interventional oncology has established its role in the management of hepatic malignancies. Image-guided locoregional therapies decrease the rate of systemic toxicity without compromising tumoricidal effect.

Somatostatin analogues in functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: literature review, clinical recommendations and schedules

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which include functioning and non-functioning forms. Somatostatin analogues (SSAs) play a key role in the management of these tumours. Herein, we aimed at reviewing the current evidence about the role of SSAs in the treatment of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An extensive bibliographical search was performed in PubMed using the following keywords: gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, somatostatin analogues, octreotide, lanreotide, in order to identify all the pertinent English-written articles published between 1990 and 2015.

RESULTS

SSAs have shown to help the symptomatic and biochemical improvement of patients with NETs and to exhibit a good safety profile. Recent studies have also reported a role for SSAs in tumour growth control, although the results are less impressive and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.

CONCLUSIONS

SSAs are well known as a symptomatic and, to lesser extent, anti-proliferative treatment in GEP-NETs. However, some issues, including optimal dosage, benefits and adverse events of combination with other molecules, and the role of new analogues, remain to be elucidated in further randomised studies.

Surgical treatment of liver metastases in patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Liver metastases occur in 75% to 80% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and are considered significant adverse prognostic indicators. Management of NETs liver metastases is challenging and requires aggressive therapy. Currently, there are many therapeutic options for metastatic NETs. However, there is considerable controversy regarding the optimal management. Although complete surgical resection remains the optimal therapy, a variety of other minimally invasive surgical and medical options are available, this includes thermal ablative techniques (e.g., radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryotherapy), embolization using transcatheter embolization, chemoembolization, or radioembolization, and medical therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, biotherapy with somatostatin analogues and interferon). Currently there is no evidence-based data directly comparing surgical versus alternative liver-directed treatment options. An aggressive surgical approach, coupled with additional liver-directed procedures is often recommended as it extends the overall survival. Optimal patient care should be directed by a multidisciplinary team to assure that all treatment options are explored for decision-making while treating this aggressive disease.

Nonsurgical Strategies in Patients With NET Liver Metastases: A Protocol of Four Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with hepatic metastases generally have a worse prognosis as compared with patients with nonmetastasized NETs. Due to tumor location and distant metastases, a surgical approach is often not possible and nonsurgical therapeutic strategies may apply.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of these systematic reviews is to evaluate the role of nonsurgical therapy options for patients with nonresectable liver metastases of NETs.

METHODS

An objective group of librarians will provide an electronic search strategy to examine the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]) databases. There will be no restriction concerning language and publication date. The qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the systematic review will be conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCT), prospective, and retrospective comparative cohort, and case-control studies. Case series will be collected in a separate database and only used for descriptive purposes.

RESULTS

This study is ongoing and presents a protocol of four systematic reviews to assess the role of nonsurgical treatment options in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

These systematic reviews, performed according to this protocol, will assess the value of noninvasive therapy options for patients with nonresectable liver metastases of NETs in combination with invasive techniques, such as percutaneous liver-directed techniques and local ablation techniques.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42012002657; http://www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2657 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDlYi37O); CRD42012002658; http://www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2658 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDlfWSuD); CRD42012002659; www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2659 (Arichived by Webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDlmWAFM); and CRD42012002660; http://www.metaxis.com/PROSPERO/full_doc.asp?RecordID=2660 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6NDmnylzp).

MRI-guided laser ablation of neuroendocrine tumor hepatic metastases

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) represent a therapeutically challenging and heterogeneous group of malignancies occurring throughout the body, but mainly in the gastrointestinal system.

PURPOSE

To describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided laser ablation of NET liver metastases and assess its role within the current treatment options and methods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two patients with NET tumor hepatic metastases were treated with MRI-guided interstitial laser ablation (LITT). Three tumors were treated. Clinical follow-up time was 10 years.

RESULTS

Both patients were successfully treated. There were no local recurrences at the ablation site during the follow-up. Both patients had survived at 10-year follow-up. One patient is disease-free.

CONCLUSION

MRI-guided laser ablation can be used to treat NET tumor liver metastases but combination therapy and a rigorous follow-up schedule are recommended.

Therapy for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are frequently malignant (50-80%, except for insulinoma) and may show an aggressive course with metastases to the liver as well as more distant sites. These heterogeneous neoplasms include functioning tumors, which secrete a variety of peptide hormones, and non-functioning tumors (up to 90% of pNETs), which often show metastases at the time of diagnosis.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for English-language publications from 1995 through December 2012. Reference lists from studies selected were manually searched to identify further relevant reports. Manuscripts comparing different therapeutic options and advances for metastatic pNETs were selected.

RESULTS

The therapeutic options for metastatic pNETs are expanding and include surgery, which remains the only curative approach, liver-directed therapies, and medical therapy. In selected cases also liver transplantation (OLT) may be considered. The option of OLT for metastatic disease is unique to neuroendocrine tumors. Recently, novel promising targeted therapies have been proposed for progressive well-differentiated pNETs.

CONCLUSIONS

The best therapeutic approach for pNETs is still matter of debating. However, since pNETs often show a more indolent behavior compared to other malignancies, the preservation of the quality of life of the patient and the personalization of the therapy according to tumor's and patient's features are mandatory.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria radiologic management of hepatic malignancy

Management of hepatic malignancy is a challenging clinical problem involving several different medical and surgical disciplines. Because of the wide variety of potential therapies, treatment protocols for various malignancies continue to evolve. Consequently, development of appropriate therapeutic algorithms necessitates consideration of medical options, such as systemic chemotherapy; surgical options, such as resection or transplantation; and locoregional therapies, such as thermal ablation and transarterial embolization. The authors discuss treatment strategies for the 3 most common subtypes of hepatic malignancy treated with locoregional therapies: hepatocellular carcinoma, neuroendocrine metastases, and colorectal metastases. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Sunitinib malate as first-line treatment for an advanced, poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare, accounting for approximately 2% of primary malignant tumors of the pancreas. Compared with common pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, they grow more slowly, are less invasive and have a better prognosis. At present, surgery is the preferred method of treatment of PNETs, and offers the only chance of a cure. However, owing to the occult onset of PNETs, once diagnosed they are often inoperable when the diagnosis is established, and the optimal treatment of patients with inoperable liver metastases remains uncertain. In recent years, targeted drug therapies have emerged and have proved effective in prolonging progression-free survival in patients with advanced well-differentiated PNETs, but hardly any progress has been made in the treatment of poorly differentiated PNETs. In the patient described in this report, who had a poorly differentiated PNET with multiple hepatic metastases and had refused cytotoxic chemotherapy, oral sunitinib malate treatment for 22 months with regular follow-ups proved tolerable and effective in significantly reducing the size of the intrahepatic masses.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors

Radiofrequency ablation of renal masses is an increasing utilized technique for treatment of malignant renal neoplasia. Image guidance is needed for radiofrequency ablation needle placement, as well as evaluation of the size of the ablation burn and determination if any residual tumor is present. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is unique in its ability to provide image guidance for this procedure. In addition to improved visualization of the mass for needle placement, the contrast can be injected multiple times during the procedure to evaluate the size of the ablation burn and the presence of residual tumor, if any. This article describes how to use contrast-enhanced ultrasound to perform radiofrequency ablation of renal masses. Pictorial cases are used to demonstrate the robustness of this technique.

An overview of the surgical management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) frequently metastasise to the liver (NLM) and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Numerous treatment options have been implemented both for cure, and to implement disease control. Surgical treatment includes curative resection, palliative cytoreductive resection and transplantation. Complete surgical resection is only possible in a subset of people with NLMs due to excessive metastatic burden and anatomical location. Ablative therapies may be used either as an adjunct to surgery or as a primary treatment. The purpose of the following article is to summarise surgical treatment strategies in the management of patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases, based on the available literature.

Adjunctive radiofrequency ablation of metastatic neuroendocrine cancer to the liver complements surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Resection of liver metastases from neuroendocrine cancer (NEC) prolongs survival and provides durable symptom relief. Not all hepatic lesions are amenable to resection, particularly when there is multifocal involvement. In this study, it was hypothesized that ablation of concomitant non-resectable NEC liver metastases is safe and salvages patients who would not have been selected for cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

  Patients who underwent adjuvant ablation of NEC liver metastases between 1995 and 2008 were reviewed. NEC was classified by patient and tumour characteristics. Regression and Kaplan-Meier models were used to compare variables and generate survival curves.

RESULTS

  Ninety-four patients underwent hepatic resection and intra-operative ablation of metastatic NEC. The median number of lesions ablated was 3, and median size was 1.4 cm. One abscess occurred at an ablation site. Local recurrence was detected in four patients (3.8%). Overall survival was 80% and 59% at 5 and 10 years. Age, gender, tumour type, grade, primary site and need for repeat ablation had no significant association with survival. The Ki67 proliferative index was a significant predictor of decreased survival. Symptom-free survival was 34% at 3 years and 16% at 5 years, independent of the tumour grade.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent ablation of NEC metastases to the liver not amenable to resection is safe and increases the candidacy of patients for cytoreductive surgery. Ablation performed intra-operatively and repeated post-operatively as needed provides significant symptom control regardless of the tumour grade.

The Treatment of Liver Metastases in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors in 2012

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of tumors that form a distinct entity. Approximately 75-80% of patients present with liver metastases at the time of their diagnosis, and 20%-25% will develop these lesions in the course of their disease. The presence of secondary deposits in the liver significantly increases the morbidity and mortality in these patients. The only potentially curative treatment is the surgical resection of the primary tumor and hepatic lesions. However, only 10% of patients presents under ideal conditions for that approach. Several techniques aimed at localized liver lesions have been applied also with interesting results in terms of survival and symptom control. The same has been demonstrated with new systemic therapies (target therapies). However, these are still under study, in order to define their true role in the management of these patients. This paper intends to address, in a general way, the various treatment options in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors.

The surgical management of neuroendocrine tumour hepatic metastases

Although rare in incidence, patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET) live for many years and so have a high prevalence, and NETs frequently metastasise to the liver (NLM). Numerous treatment options have been implemented both for cure, and to implement disease control. Surgical treatment consists of curative resection, palliative cytoreductive resection and transplantation. Complete surgical resection is possible only in a subset of people with NLMs due to various factors. Ablative therapies may also be used, either as an adjunct to surgery or as a primary treatment. The purpose of the article is to summarise surgical treatment strategies in the management of patients with hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: biology, diagnosis,and treatment

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), a group of endocrine tumors arising in the pancreas, are among the most common neuroendocrine tumors. The genetic causes of familial and sporadic PNETs are somewhat understood, but their molecular pathogenesis remains unknown. Most PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential. The biological behavior of an individual PNET is unpredictable; higher tumor grade, lymph node and liver metastasis, and larger tumor size generally indicate a less favorable prognosis. Endocrine testing, imaging, and histological evidence are necessary to accurately diagnose PNETs. A 4-pronged aggressive treatment approach consisting of surgery, locoregional therapy, systemic therapy, and complication control has become popular in academic centers around the world. The optimal application of the multiple systemic therapeutic modalities is under development; efficacy, safety, availability, and cost should be considered when treating a specific patient. The clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of specific types of PNETs and familial PNET syndromes, including the novel Mahvash disease, are summarized.

Outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection for neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare the outcomes in patients with hepatic carcinoid tumor metastases treated with open versus laparoscopic liver resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our liver surgery database was performed. All patients who underwent liver resection for hepatic carcinoid tumor metastases were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the surgical approach. Patients with concomitant primary and metastatic liver lesions underwent open resection.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent resection over a 10-year period (21 open and 15 laparoscopic). Both groups were similar in terms of gender, body mass index, tumor size, incidence of carcinoid syndrome, and extent of resection (P > .05). The laparoscopic group had less mean operative time (2.7 vs 5.4 hours), less mean blood loss (158.3 vs 538.9 mL), and a shorter hospital stay (3.2 vs 7.5 days; P < .05 for all). Complications were similar in both groups (20% vs 33%; P = .21). Two laparoscopic cases required conversion. The 3-year disease-free survival for the laparoscopic group was 73.3% compared to 47.6% for the open group (P = .2).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first reported study comparing laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the treatment of liver metastases from carcinoid tumors. Our series confirms that selective cases can safely be managed laparoscopically.

Treatment of liver metastases in patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases are a strong prognostic indicator in patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Therapeutic options for metastatic NETs are expanding and not mutually exclusive.

AIMS

This paper reviews the literature relating to multidisciplinary approach towards GEP-NET metastases, to highlight advances in knowledge regarding these tumors, and to understand the interdisciplinary management of individual patients.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed for English-language publications from 1995 through 2012. Reference lists from studies selected were manually searched to identify further relevant reports. Manuscripts comparing different therapeutic options and advances for GEP-NET-related liver metastases were selected.

RESULTS

There is considerable controversy regarding the optimal management of GEP-NET metastases. Although radical surgery still remains the gold standard, a variety of other therapeutic options are available for metastatic GEP-NETs, including loco-regional chemotherapy/radiotherapy, radioembolization, systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, biotherapy, and chemotherapy. In selected patients, liver transplantation should also be considered. Systemic somatostatin analogues and/or interferon show anti-proliferative effects, representing an appropriate first-line treatment for most patients. In advanced metastatic NETs, recent options include targeted therapies (i.e., everolimus and sunitinib).

CONCLUSIONS

It is evident that multidisciplinary care and multimodality treatments remain the cornerstone of management of NET patients. Since NETs often show a more indolent behavior compared to other malignancies, physicians should aim to preserve a satisfactory quality of life for the patient by personalizing the therapeutic approach according to the tumor's features and prognostic factors.

Hepatic artery embolization for neuroendocrine tumors: postprocedural management and complications

BACKGROUND

There is scant evidence to guide the management of patients after hepatic artery embolization (HAE). We examined length of stay (LOS), laboratory patterns, medication usage, morbidity, and mortality of patients hospitalized after HAE for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

Data were abstracted retrospectively from electronic medical records on LOS, liver function tests (LFTs), i.v. antibiotics, analgesia, peak temperature, bacteremia, hepatic abscess formation, carcinoid crisis, and metastatic burden on cross-sectional imaging.

RESULTS

In 2005-2009, 72 patients underwent 174 HAEs for carcinoid and islet cell tumors. The median LOS was 4 days (range, 1-8 days). There was no correlation between peak LFTs and tumor burden. Declines in LFTs were not uniform before hospital discharge; 25%, 37%, 30%, 53%, and 67% of patients were discharged before their respective aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total and direct bilirubin levels began to decline, with no readmissions for acute hepatic failure. The median i.v. analgesia dose was 60 mg oral morphine equivalents (range, 3-1,961 mg). Pre-HAE i.v. antibiotics were administered in 99% of cases; post-HAE fever occurred in 37% of patients, with no documented bacteremia. One patient developed a hepatic abscess after HAE. There were two carcinoid crises. The single in-hospital death was associated with air in the portal veins.

CONCLUSIONS

The duration and intensity of in-hospital care following HAE should be managed on an individual basis. A downward trend in LFTs is not required before discharge. Modest use of i.v. analgesia suggests that many patients could exclusively receive oral analgesics. Given the rarity of serious complications, hospital stays could be shortened, thereby reducing costs and nosocomial risks.

Prognostic clinicopathologic factors in longitudinally followed patients with metastatic small bowel carcinoid tumors

OBJECTIVES

Neuroendocrine tumors demonstrate heterogeneous behavior based on the site of origin and histology. This study aimed to delineate prognostic clinicopathologic features in patients with metastatic midgut carcinoid.

METHODS

All patients underwent resection of the primary tumor in the setting of metastatic disease. Survival was measured from the date of primary tumor resection and calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation. Clinical data include age, sex, serum biomarkers, primary tumor size, Ki-67 index, and the performance of hepatic cytoreductive procedure. Serially collected serum biomarkers were considered as mean values within periods relative to primary resection: preoperative, 0 to 1 year postoperative, and years 1 to 5 postoperative. Log-rank comparisons were used to assess the prognostic value of the aforementioned features.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (21 men) with metastatic midgut carcinoid who underwent primary tumor resection were identified. Median survival was 121 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83%. Age higher than 65 years (P = 0.01) and late postoperative chromogranin A (CgA; P = 0.02) were associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the favorable prognosis of patients with metastatic small bowel carcinoid in a multidisciplinary treatment program. Among other factors, elevated postoperative CgA is associated with decreased survival. The significance of increased CgA over time underlies the importance of longitudinal follow-up for these patients.

Neuroendocrine tumor presenting like lymphoma: a case report

Introduction

Neuroendocrine tumors are a rare but diverse group of malignancies that arise in a wide range of organ systems, including the mediastinum. Differential diagnosis includes other masses arising in the middle mediastinum such as lymphoma, pericardial, bronchogenic and enteric cysts, metastatic tumors, xanthogranuloma, systemic granuloma, diaphragmatic hernia, meningocele and paravertebral abscess.

Case presentation

We present a case of 42-year-old Caucasian man with a neuroendocrine tumor of the middle-posterior mediastinum and liver metastases, which resembled a lymphoma on magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusion

The differential diagnosis in patients with mediastinal masses and liver lesions should include neuroendocrine tumor.

Serum and ascites chromogranin-A in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

Ascites secondary to neuroendocrine tumor metastases may arise from a variety of mechanisms. Our aim was to measure serum and ascitic chromogranin-A (CgA) to help determine whether ascites resulted from intraperitoneal/retroperitoneal disease burden or from other carcinoid complications such as congestive heart failure or portal hypertension.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and ascites were identified. Chromogranin-A was obtained and measured from both serum and ascites. The causes of carcinoid ascites was categorized into 2 groups: high intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal disease burden (ie, peritoneal metastases and/or lymphatic obstruction; n = 12, group 1) or other organ-specific carcinoid complications such as CHF or portal hypertension (n = 12, group 2).

RESULTS

An ascites CgA/serum CgA ratio greater than 1 was more likely to be found in group 1 (P = 0.01). This ratio produced 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity for ascites secondary to peritoneal metastases and/or lymphatic obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

An ascites CgA/serum CgA ratio greater than 1 produces excellent accuracy in predicting peritoneal metastases and/or retroperitoneal disease as the cause of ascites in the setting of metastatic carcinoid. This test may play a role in the earlier identification of those patients who may be well served by aggressive management.

Multimodal liver-directed management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases

A preponderance of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) will experience hepatic metastases during the course of their disease. Many diagnoses of NETs are made only after the neoplasms have spread from their primary gastroenteropancreatic sites to the liver. This paper reviews current evidence-based treatments for neuroendocrine hepatic metastases, encompassing surgery, hepatic artery embolization (HAE) and chemoembolization (HACE), radioembolization, hepatic artery infusion (HAI), thermal ablation (radiofrequency, microwave, and cryoablation), alcohol ablation, and liver transplantation as therapeutic modalities. Consideration of a multidisciplinary approach to liver-directed therapy is strongly encouraged to limit morbidity and mortality in this patient population.

Selective intraarterial radionuclide therapy with yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres for hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: Initial experience at a single center

Background/Aim. Selective intraarterial radionuclide therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres is also known as radioembolization and delivers high doses of radiation to hepatic tumors with minimum healthy liver exposure. The aim of this study was to present our preliminary experience in the role of liver directed radiotherapy with Y-90 microspheres for the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Methods. The results of SIRT in 10 patients (5 males, 5 females; mean age 48.7 years; age range 24-73 years) with metastatic liver disease from NETs during the period from April 2008 through August 2010 were reviewed. All patients had meticulous pre- and post-imaging studies as a part of their work-up procedure, as well as serologic tests of liver function to determine the extent of liver function damage. The patients who were eligible for SIRT had pretreatment visceral angiography to define and occlude non-target arteries. Results. The mean ? SD administered SIR-Spheres? activity was 1.49 ? 0.42 GBq (range 0.72-2.21 GBq) in all the patients. These treatments delivered a dose of 99.73 ? 66.36 Gy (range 49- 420.8 Gy) to the target tumors. The estimated dose to the lungs and normal liver was 4.45 ? 1.95 Gy (range 2.4-8.5 Gy) and 26.73 ? 14.19 Gy (range 5-58.9 Gy), respectively. Overall response rate of 90% and patient tolerance was satisfactory for most patients. Conclusion. From our limited experience, we can conclude that SIRT with Y-90 microspheres is a safe and efficacious treatment option for patients with liver metastasis of NET without any serious side effects.

Radiofrequency ablation of neuroendocrine hepatic metastasis

Neuroendocrine cancer commonly metastasizes to the liver and often presents as unresectable disease. Liver resection or debulking most of the tumor provides a survival advantage for patients. Whether used alone or in combination with resection, radiofrequency ablation provides a unique tool to destroy metastases to the liver and spare hepatic parenchyma. Although randomized trials are lacking, retrospective series provide promising data to consider radiofrequency ablation in the management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) has increased over the past three decades. Hepatic metastases which occur in up to 75% of NET patients significantly worsen their prognosis. New imaging techniques with increasing sensitivity enabling tumour detection at an early stage have been developed. The treatment encompasses a panel of surgical and non-surgical modalities.

METHODS

This article reviews the published literature related to management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

RESULTS

Abdominal computer tomography, magnetic resonance tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are widely accepted imaging modalities. Hepatic resection is the only potentially curative treatment. Liver transplantation is justified in highly selected patients. Liver-directed interventional techniques and locally ablative measures offer effective palliation. Promising novel therapeutic options offering targeted approaches are under evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases still needs to be standardized. Management in centres of expertise should be strongly encouraged in order to enable a multidisciplinary approach and personalized treatment. Development of molecular prognostic factors to select treatment according to patient risk should be attempted.

Surgical management of liver metastases from gastrointestinal endocrine tumors

Liver metastases from endocrine tumors can reduce 5-year survival from 90% to 40% and, in cases of functional gastrointestinal endocrine tumors, lead to a carcinoid syndrome. Complete resection of cancerous disease should be considered in all cases. Indeed, after hepatectomy, prolonged survival (41-86% at five years) can be achieved, with low rates of surgery-related mortality (0-6.7%). Extended liver resection is required in most cases. Percutaneous portal embolization increases the volumetric feasibility of resection, and sequential hepatectomy techniques enable a two-stage resection of both bilobar metastases and the primary tumor. For carcinoid syndrome that does not respond to medical therapy, incomplete resection of liver metastases, by reducing tumor volume, may be indicated to reduce symptoms and halt the progression of carcinoid heart disease. In cases of non-resectable liver metastases in selected patients, liver transplantation can lead to 5-year survival rates as high as 77%.

Hepatic ablation for neuroendocrine tumor metastases

The indolent nature of neuroendocrine tumors and their proclivity to be hormonally active warrant aggressive treatment for advanced stage disease with hepatic metastases. Cytoreduction has been associated with improved symptom control as well as prolonged survival compared with those treated with medical therapy. The primary modalities of cytoreduction employed are resection, ablation, and embolization. In particular, radiofrequency ablation has been utilized with good results and minimal morbidity for treating patients with advanced neuroendocrine disease.

Insulinoma

Insulinoma is a rare neuroendocrine tumor with an incidence of 4 per 1 million persons per year, which may occur as a unifocal sporadic event in patients without an inherited syndrome or as a part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Key neuroglycopenic and hypoglycemic symptoms in conjunction with biochemical proof establish the diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is established, the insulinoma is preoperatively localized within the pancreas with the goal of surgical excision for cure. This review discusses the historical background, diagnosis, and management of sporadic insulinoma.

Neuroendocrine tumors: role of interventional radiology in therapy

The management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is complex. Although NETs can affect a variety of organ systems, hepatic metastatic disease in particular lends itself to a wide range of interventional treatment options. Prior detailed radiologic assessment and careful patient selection are required. Curative surgery should always be considered but is rarely possible. Embolization, radionuclide therapy, or ablative techniques may then be undertaken. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) may be used alone or in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). NET type and extent of hepatic involvement are factors that can help predict the success of either TAE or TACE. Embolization techniques can also be useful in patients with nonhepatic NETs. Radionuclide therapy is emerging as a valuable adjunct and is dependent on positive somatostatin receptor status. Therapeutic radiopeptides may be delivered arterially. Ablative techniques have been shown to play a role in the palliation of symptoms and principally involve radiofrequency ablation. Hepatic cryotherapy and percutaneous ethanol injection have also been used. A multidisciplinary approach to treatment and follow-up is important. Imaging should involve dual-phase multidetector computed tomography and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The role of the interventional radiologist will continue to expand as imaging techniques become more refined.

90Y Radioembolization for metastatic neuroendocrine liver tumors: preliminary results from a multi-institutional experience

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation are used for hepatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) therapy. Results from another minimally invasive therapy, radioembolization, remain unknown. The purpose of this multicenter open label phase II study was to assess the efficacy and safety of yttrium-90 (Y) radioembolization for treating hepatic metastatic NET using a primary outcome of tumor response and secondary outcomes of serologic toxicities and survival.

MATERIAL/METHODS

In this multicenter study, all patients underwent lobar radioembolization using glass or resin Y radioembolic agents. Patients were assessed serologically and radiographically at 2 to 4 weeks and then at 1 to 3 month intervals after treatment. We 1) compared liver volumes, radiation doses, and serologic liver function tests (unpaired t test, P = 0.05) and 2) assessed tumor response, serologic toxicity, and median survival from first Y therapy. The clinicaltrials.gov identifier was NCT00532740.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent radioembolization using glass (mean age 58 +/- 12 years) or resin (mean age 61 +/- 11 years) microspheres. A statistically significant greater median radiation dose was delivered to each lobe using glass (right lobe 117 Gy; left lobe 108 Gy) than using resin (right 50.8 Gy; left 44.5 Gy) (P < 0.01). Using Response Criteria in Solid Tumors, 92% of glass and 94% of resin patients were classified as partial response or stable disease at 6 months after treatment. Six patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities during the follow-up period. Median survival was 22 months (glass) and 28 months (resin) (P = 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Y radioembolization of metastatic NET is a viable therapy with acceptable toxicity. Further investigation is warranted.