Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma

Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Patients Treated With Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and microwave ablation (MWA) are 2 of the most advanced techniques for the management of localized small renal masses.

PURPOSE

To compare the perioperative, functional and oncological results of RAPN and MWA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 171 consecutive patients undergoing either RAPN or MWA for a localized small renal mass at a single academic center was retrospectively collected. Baseline features included patients' demographics and masses' characteristics. Procedures were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function variation Progression of a persistent lesion or local recurrence after a complete treatment defined local tumor progression. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis tested the association between predictors and local tumor progression.

RESULTS

Of all, 109 and 62 patients underwent RAPN and MWA. Patients in the MWA group were older (P = .002) had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (P < .001) and higher frequency of preoperative chronic kidney disease (P < .001). MWA led to a shorter postoperative hospitalization time (P < .001) and lower incidence of medical complications (6.5% vs. 22.9%, P = .02) than RAPN. GFR decline was similar between groups both at discharge (P = .39) and at the time of last follow up (P = 1.00). A lower rate of secondary interventions (11.7% vs. 2.8%, P = .037) and a better disease-free survival (83.2% vs. 96.5%, P = .027) were reported after RAPN. Conversely, cancer specific and overall survival were comparable (P > .05). At univariate regression analysis, MWA was associated with local tumor progression (HR 3.46, P = .040).

CONCLUSION

MWA displayed a lower perioperative impact, while functional outcomes were similar after each intervention. RAPN resulted superior in terms of tumor eradication, but no difference was noted regarding cancer specific survival. Thus, MWA represents a valid alternative in frail patients, though less radical than RAPN.

Minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatments for T1 renal cell cancer in patients over 75 years: a comparison of outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation

PURPOSE

To compare the oncological and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) for treatment of T1 renal cell cancer (RCC) in patients older than 75 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective national multicenter study included all patients older than 75 years treated for a T1 RCC by RPN or PTA between January 2010 and January 2021. Patients' characteristics, tumor data, and perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients for 209 procedures (143 RPN and 66 PTA) were included. In the PTA group, patients were older (80.4 ± 3.7 vs. 79 ± 3.7 years (p = 0.01)); frailer (ASA score (2.43 ± 0.6 vs. 2.17 ± 0.6 (p < 0.01)); and more frequently had a history of kidney surgery (16.7% [11/66] vs. 5.6% [8/143] (p = 0.01)) than in the RPN group. Tumors were larger in the RPN group (2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 0.9 cm (p < 0.01)). Operation time, length of hospital stay, and increase of creatinine serum level were higher in RPN (respectively 92.1 ± 42.7 vs. 150.7 ± 61.3 min (p < 0.01); 1.7 ± 1.4 vs. 4.2 ± 3.4 days (p < 0.01); 1.9 ± 19.3% vs. 10.1 ± 23.7 (p = 0.03)). Disease-free survival and time to progression were similar (respectively, HR 2.2; 95% CI 0.88-5.5; p = 0.09; HR 2.1; 95% CI 0.86-5.2; p = 0.1). Overall survival was shorter for PTA that disappeared after Cox adjusting model (HR 3.3; 95% CI 0.87-12.72; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Similar oncological outcomes are observed after PTA and RPN for T1 RCC in elderly patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous thermal ablation have similar oncological outcomes for T1a kidney cancer in patients over 75 years; however, operative time, decrease in renal function, and length of hospital stay were lower with ablation.

KEY POINTS

• After adjusting model for age and ASA score, similar oncological outcomes are observed after percutaneous thermal ablation and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell cancer in elderly patients. • Operation time, length of hospital stay, and increase of creatinine serum level were higher in the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy group.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment option for small renal masses, comparable to partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

The standard therapy for small renal masses (SRMs) remains partial nephrectomy (PN), which is associated with relatively high morbidity and complication rate. Therefore, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) emerges as an alternative therapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and oncological outcomes of PRFA versus PN.

METHODS

A multicenter non-inferiority study with retrospective analysis of 291 patients with SRMs (N0M0), who underwent PN or PRFA (2:1), recruited prospectively from two hospitals in the Andalusian Public Health System, Spain, between 2014 and 2021. Comparisons of treatment features were evaluated using the t test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, Fisher test, and Cochran-Armitage trend test. Kaplan-Meier curves depicted overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) rates in the overall study population.

RESULTS

A total of 291 consecutive patients were identified; 111 and 180 patients underwent PRFA and PN, respectively. Median follow-up time was 38 and 48 months, and mean hospitalization days were 1.04 and 3.57 days, respectively. The variables underpinned with high surgical risk were significantly increased in PRFA compared to those in PN (mean age was 64.56 and 57.47 years, the solitary kidney presence was 12.6% and 5.6%, ASA score ≥ 3 was 36% and 14.5%, respectively). The rest of oncological outcomes were comparable amongst PRFA and PN. Patients undergoing PRFA did not improve OS, LRFS, and MFS compared to those undergoing PN. Limitations comprise retrospective design and limited statistical power.

CONCLUSION

PRFA for SMRs in high-risk patients is non-inferior in terms of oncological outcomes and safety compared to PN.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our study has a direct clinical application as it proves that radiofrequency ablation is an effective and uncomplicated therapeutic option for patients with small renal masses.

KEY POINTS

•There are non-inferiority results in overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival between PRFA and PN. •Our two-center study showed that PRFA is non-inferior to PN in oncological outcomes. •Contrast-enhanced power ultrasound-guided PRFA provides an effective therapy for T1 renal tumors.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for renal cell carcinoma: evaluating the performance of nephrometry scores

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the performance of RENAL and mRENAL scores, in the prediction of oncological outcomes in patients treated with microwave ablation (MWA) for (T1) renal cell carcinomas (RCC).

METHODS

Institutional database retrospective research identified 76 patients with a biopsy-proven solitary T1a (84%) or T1b (16%) RCC; all patients underwent CT-guided MWA ablation. Tumor complexity was reviewed by calculating RENAL and mRENAL scores.

RESULTS

The majority of the lesions were exophytic (82.9%), with > 7 mm nearness to the collecting system (53.9%), located posteriorly (73.6%), and lower to polar lines (61.8%). Mean RENAL and mRENAL scores were 5.7 (SD = 1.9) and 6.1 (SD = 2.1) respectively. Progression rates were significantly higher with greater tumor size (> 4 cm), with < 4 mm nearness to the collecting system, for tumors crossing a polar line and with the anterior location. None of the above was associated with complications. RENAL and mRENAL scores were significantly higher in patients with incomplete ablation. The ROC analysis showed the significant prognostic ability of both RENAL and mRENAL scores for progression. In both scores, the optimal cut-off point was 6.5. Univariate Cox regression analysis for progression showed a hazard ratio of 7.73 for the RENAL score and 7.48 for the mRENAL score.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study show that the risk of progression was higher in patients with RENAL and mRENAL score of > 6.5, in T1b tumors, close to the collective system (< 4 mm), crossing polar lines and anterior location.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

CT-guided percutaneous MWA is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of T1a renal cell carcinomas. Different morphometric parameters of RCC tumors including RENAL and mRENAL score > 6.5, size, proximity to the collecting system, and crossing of polar lines impact the efficacy of MWA and progression survival rates.

KEY POINTS

• The risk of progression is higher in patients with RENAL and mRENAL score > 6.5, in T1b tumors, close to the collective system (< 4 mm), crossing polar lines and anterior location. • The significant prognostic ability of the mRENAL score for progression was higher than the respective of the RENAL score. • Complications were not associated with any of the above factors.

Advancing Treatment Frontiers: Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Renal Mass-Intermediate-Term Results

Our study aims to discern the immediate and intermediate-term oncological outcomes of the patients with small renal mass and who were surgically unfit or were having a bilateral tumor and underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the mass. We retrospectively and prospectively analyzed the status of the patients who were diagnosed to have small renal masses and were biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases, who underwent RFA at our institute from the year 2013 to 2022. Patients were followed-up for 3 years. Data regarding complications were analyzed for all patients who underwent renal RFA along with the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. A total of 28 patients were eligible for the study based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Their renal function was recorded. They underwent RFA and were followed-up for a period of 3 years for RFS. Four patients out of the total had immediate complications, out of which two developed a hematoma. Three-year-follow-ups showed six recurrences, overall having 78.6% RFS. Post-procedural renal function was stable as documented by Estimated glomerular filtration rate. Oncological results of RFA in patients with small renal masses who are surgically unfit are associated with a low risk of immediate and intermediate-term deterioration of renal function.

[Nephron sparing in the management of localized solid renal mass]

Managing a malignant renal tumor requires, first of all, a reflection on the necessity of its treatment. It must consider the renal function, altered at the time of diagnosis in 50% of cases. The treatment method chosen depends on many factors, in particular, the predicted residual renal function, the risk of chronic kidney disease, the need for temporary or long-term dialysis, and overall long-term survival. Other factors include the size, position, and number of tumors and a hereditary tumor background. When a renal-sparing management alternative is available, total nephrectomy should no longer be performed in patients with small malignant renal masses (cT1a). This may consist of surgery (partial nephrectomy or lumpectomy), percutaneous thermo-ablation (by radiofrequency, microwave, or cryotherapy). In patients with limited life expectancy, imaging-based surveillance may be proposed to suggest treatment in case of local progression. Good coordination between urologist, radiologist, nephrologist, and sometimes radiotherapist should allow optimal management of patients with a malignant renal tumor with or without underlying renal failure.

Radiofrequency ablation for renal tumours: A retrospective study from a tertiary centre

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for localised renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a tertiary hospital patient who remained unfit for surgical intervention.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed survival outcomes for patients with biopsy proven RCC treated by RFA at Royal Perth Hospital between September 2009 and May 2018. Complication data were gathered for all patients that underwent renal RFA along with 2- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and compared the outcomes with data from previous studies.

Results

A total of 69 patients (73 procedures) were eligible for the study, and those patients had biopsy-proven RCC with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The complication rate was 8.2% (6/73) and local recurrence rate 9.6% (7/73). Two-year RFS is 95.7% and 5-year RFS is 78.8% on a median 3.82-year follow-up (interquartile range 1.90-5.75 years).

Conclusion

RFA performed at our centre was found to be safe and effective with low complication rates and durable RFS in line with expectations from existing research. Our study demonstrated that RFA is an alternative modality of treatment for small renal tumours in patients unfit for surgical approach.

A Comparison of Functional and Oncologic Outcomes between Partial Nephrectomy and Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease after Propensity Score Matching

Purpose: This study aimed to compare functional and oncological outcomes between partial nephrectomy (PN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for a small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Materials and Methods: Patients with CKD who underwent either PN or RFA for SRM between 2005 and 2019 were included. Patients were stratified into two categories: CKD stage 2 and CKD stage 3 or higher. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) analysis in patients with CKD stage 2 and CKD stage 3 or higher. We compared the functional and oncological outcomes between two groups according to CKD stage before and after PSM. Results: Among 1332 patients, 1195 patients were CKD stage 2 and 137 patients were CKD stage 3 or higher. After PSM analysis using age, pre-treatment eGFR, and clinical tumor size as matching variables, the PN and RFA groups had 270 and 135 CKD stage 2 patients, respectively, and both had 53 patients each with CKD stage 3 or higher. There were no significant differences in percent change in eGFR at 1 year post-operation between groups in patients with CKD stage 2 and stage 3 or higher. Among all patients with tissue-proven malignancy, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were significantly higher in the PN group. However, only the 5-year RFS was significantly higher in the PN group after matching. Conclusion: Mortality is low in patients with SRM, and functional outcomes were not significantly different between the two treatments. RFA could be an alternative treatment modality in patients who are poor candidates for surgery.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy Versus Focal Therapy for Small Renal Masses

Background

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) and focal therapy (FT) are popular trends for small renal masses (SRMs). However, there is currently no systematic comparison between MIPN and FT of SRMs. Therefore, we systematically study the perioperative, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes of MIPN and FT in SRMs.

Methods

We have searched the Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed for articles between MIPN (robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy) and FT {radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), cryoablation (CA), irreversible electroporation, non-thermal [irreversible electroporation (IRE)] ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)}. We calculated pooled mean difference (MD), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (CRD42021260787).

Results

A total of 26 articles (n = 4,420) were included in the study. Compared with MIPN, the operating time (OP) of FT had significantly lower (SMD, −1.20; CI, −1.77 to −0.63; I2 = 97.6%, P &lt; 0.0001), estimated blood loss (EBL) of FT had significantly less (SMD, −1.20; CI, −1.77 to −0.63; I2 = 97.6%, P &lt; 0.0001), length of stay (LOS) had shorter (SMD, −0.90; CI, −1.26 to −0.53; I2 = 92.2%, P &lt; 0.0001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of FT was significantly lower decrease (SMD, −0.90; CI, −1.26 to −0.53; I2 = 92.2%, P &lt; 0.0001). However, FT possessed lower risk in minor complications (Clavien 1–2) (OR, 0.69; CI, 0.45 to 1.07; I2 = 47%, P = 0.023) and overall complications (OR, 0.71; CI, 0.51 to 0.99; I2 = 49.2%, P = 0.008). Finally, there are no obvious difference between FT and MIPN in local recurrence, distant metastasis, and major complications (P &gt; 0.05).

Conclusion

FT has more advantages in protecting kidney function, reducing bleeding, shortening operating time, and shortening the length of stay. There is no difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, and major complications. For the minimally invasive era, we need to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of all aspects to make comprehensive choices.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021260787).

Comparison of the Results of Therapy for cT1 Renal Carcinoma with Nephron-Sparing Surgery (NSS) vs. Percutaneous Thermal Ablation (TA)

Implementation of ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into abdominal cavity diagnostics enabled early detection of cT1 graded renal cancers. According to European Association of Urology (EAU) and Polish urological Association (PUA) recommended method of treatment is sparing resection of renal parenchyma with tumour—nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). In selected cases other methods such as thermal ablation (TA) or cryoablation can be introduced /1/. Objectives: To evaluate the results of treatment of cT1 renal tumours with the use of NSS and TA methods. Material and methods: 140 patients with cT1 renal carcinoma were treated in 2nd Department of Urology of Medical University of Lodz between 2014 and 2017. Neuron-sparing surgery was performed in 56 cases (40%), while percutane-ous thermal ablation (TA) in 84 cases (60%). Demographic data, clinical data (lab results, Charlson index), nephrometry data (tumour size, location, R.E.N.A.L. score) post-operative data (Clavien-Dindo classifica-tion) were investigated. Histopathology results, Fuhrman malignancy grading, as total three-year survival of patients were evaluated. The following methods were used for statistical evaluation: Chi2, Fisher, W Shapiro-Wilk, U Mann-Whitney tests, Kaplan-Meier’s curve and Cox model. The results were displayed in a form of median and upper and lower quartile values (25–75%). Results: No statistical differences in gender nor left/right kidney location were observed. Patients, who underwent TA were at average 10 years older and had multiple comorbidities (median age for TA was 79, for NSS 68; median Charlson index for TA was 5 and for NSS was 3). TA patients had lesser haematological values (Hb, Ht). R.E.N.A.L. scoring demonstrated comparable nephrometry in both groups. NSS procedure was open laparotomy without temporary clamping of renal vessels. Surgical margins of resected tumours were negative. TA was performed with Cool-Tip Covidienequipment with the use of Cluster electrode and was ultraso-nography-guided. Post-treatment complications evaluated with the use of Clavien-Dindo classification were slightly more frequent for NSS method. Patients after NSS were discharged at average after 8.5 days and after TA after 3 days. Histopathological type and Fuhrman malignancy grading were comparable in both groups. TA treated patients’ death risk was 9-fold of that observed in NSS treated patients. There was 1 death for each group in perioperative period. Conclusion: 1. NSS was associated with slightly higher side effect rate but resulted in prolonged survival. 2. TA was applied to elderly patients with comorbidities. Despite less invasive treatment this group had poorer/reduced survival. 3. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the treatment method were relevant survival factors in patients treated due to cT1 renal cancer tumours.

Applications of Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers

Simple Summary

Cancer is a prevalent disease globally, and conventional treatment options have been associated with substantial morbidity for patients. The unique acoustic properties and biological effects of focused ultrasound have been investigated for use as an alternative treatment option for various forms of cancer with lower associated morbidity than standard treatments. The objective of our review was to assess the current state and various applications of focused ultrasound for the treatment of genitourinary cancers, including prostate, kidney, bladder, penile, and testicular malignancies. Current research demonstrates that focused ultrasound-based focal therapy shows promise for the treatment of localized prostate and kidney cancer, and the effect of ultrasound on cell membranes may increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy. Focused ultrasound-based treatment modalities should continue to be investigated as an alternative or complementary treatment option for cancer patients.

Abstract

Traditional cancer treatments have been associated with substantial morbidity for patients. Focused ultrasound offers a novel modality for the treatment of various forms of cancer which may offer effective oncological control and low morbidity. We performed a review of PubMed articles assessing the current applications of focused ultrasound in the treatment of genitourinary cancers, including prostate, kidney, bladder, penile, and testicular cancer. Current research indicates that high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) focal therapy offers effective short-term oncologic control of localized prostate and kidney cancer with lower associated morbidity than radical surgery. In addition, studies in mice have demonstrated that focused ultrasound treatment increases the accuracy of chemotherapeutic drug delivery, the efficacy of drug uptake, and cytotoxic effects within targeted cancer cells. Ultrasound-based therapy shows promise for the treatment of genitourinary cancers. Further research should continue to investigate focused ultrasound as an alternative cancer treatment option or as a complement to increase the efficacy of conventional treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Tumor Size on the Progression Survival Rates

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) along with identifying prognostic factors affecting the progression survival rate. Institutional database retrospective research identified 69 patients with a biopsy proven solitary T1a (82.6%) or TIb (17.4%) RCC who have underwent percutaneous CT-guided MWA. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for events were graphed and Cox regression analysis was conducted. Mean patient age was 70.4 ± 11.5 years. Mean size of the lesions was 3 ± 1.3 cm. Mean follow up time was 35.6 months (SD = 21.1). The mean progression free survival time from last ablation was 84.2 months. For T1a tumors, the cumulative progression free survival rate for 1, 6, 12 and 36 months were 100% (SE = 0%), 91.2% (SE = 3.7%), 91.2% (SE = 3.7%) and 87.5% (SE = 4.4%); the recurrence free survival rate for T1a RCC was 94.9%. For T1b tumors, the cumulative progression free survival rate for 1, 6, 12 and 36 months were 100% (SE = 0%), 63.6% (SE = 14.5%), 63.6% (SE = 14.5%) and 63.6% (SE = 14.5%). Grade 1 complications were recorded in 5 (7.2%) patients. Significantly greater hazard for progression was found in cases with a tumor size > 4 cm (HR = 9.09, p = 0.048). No statistically important difference regarding tumor progression was recorded between T1a tumors with a diameter ≤3 cm and >3 cm. In summary, the results of the present study show that CT guided percutaneous MWA is an effective technique for treatment of T1a renal cell carcinomas, irrespective of tumor size. T1b tumors were associated with higher progression rates.

Local anesthesia for percutaneous US/CT-guided bipolar radiofrequency ablation of small renal masses: A safe and feasible alternative

PURPOSE

This study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of local anesthesia (LA) for percutaneous ultrasound/computed tomography (US/CT)-guided bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small renal masses (SRMs) by comparing the LA with general anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out between January 2018 to June 2020, 102 patients with SRMs were treated with US/CT-guided bipolar RFA. General anesthesia (GA) was performed in 42 and LA was performed in 60 patients. Demographics, tumor characteristics, peri-procedural data, pathologic and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. The factors associated with pain were also identified.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographics and tumor characteristics between the LA and GA group. A statistically significant difference was observed in terms of procedural time (P = 0.010) and hospital stays (P < 0.001). The maximum perceived pain in LA group comprised 60.0% (36 of 60) mild, 40.0% (24 of 60) moderate. The anxiety in LA group comprised 65.0% (39 of 60) mild, 33.3% (20 of 60) moderate, 1.7% (1 of 60) severe. On multivariate analysis, tumor diameter was a significant predictor for pain in RFA procedure (OR 1.560, 95% CI 1.233-1.974, P < 0.001). All patients were followed up for a median (range) of 12 (2-24) months. Local recurrence occurred in 8.3% (5 of 60) of the LA group and in 7.1% (3 of 42) in GA group (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous bipolar RFA of SRMs using CT and ultrasound guidance under LA can be an effective and tolerable method for patients who are unfit for surgery and provide satisfactory oncologic control.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Biopsy-Proven T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients With Other Primary Malignancies

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to investigate the oncologic effectiveness and survival outcomes of percutaneous image-guided thermal ablation for clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with other primary nonrenal malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We reviewed records of patients with histologically proven T1a RCC (< 4.0 cm) treated with thermal ablation over a period of 10 years between January 2005 and December 2014. We recorded past or current history of primary malignancy other than RCC, status of the primary malignancy, tumor histology (in remission or under therapy), and whether patient was currently alive or not, and if not, the date and reason of death. Three cohorts were studied: patients with RCC only (group A), patients with RCC and other primary malignancy in remission (group B), and patients with RCC and other primary malignancy under treatment (group C). The Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to estimate the survival rates. RESULTS. One hundred nine patients met the inclusion criteria (109 lesions, 110 ablation procedures). There were 46, 45, and 18 patients in the A, B, and C groups, respectively. The 5-year survival was 87%, 63%, and 40% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The local recurrence-free survival for the whole sample was 95% at 3, 5, and 10 years. The disease-free survival was 96%, 93%, and 91% at 3, 5, and 10 years. Although a significant difference is noted between the three cohorts in overall survival (p = .02); for RCC, there were no significance differences in the local recurrence-free, disease-free, metastasis-free, and cancer-specific survivals. In addition, there was no difference in outcomes for patients in group B (in remission) when compared with those in group C (under treatment). CONCLUSION. Thermal ablation is an effective and safe modality of treatment of T1a RCC in patients with other primary malignancies that are in remission or under treatment.

In-circuit high-frequency jet ventilation to reduce organ motion in a child undergoing sarcoma ablation

Patients with primary or metastatic solid tumours can be treated with minimally invasive image-guided procedures as an alternative to surgical resection. Reducing organ motion during these procedures is crucial so that tumours can be accurately targeted and treatment delivered within a small margin, limiting potential damage to adjacent structures. As ventilation is the main cause of motion, there has been a shift from conventional ventilation towards the use of in-circuit high-frequency jet ventilation techniques for these procedures. We present the case of a 7-year-old who required computed tomography-guided microwave ablation of a right lung metastatic nodule under general anaesthesia. The patient's lungs were ventilated with in-circuit high-frequency jet ventilation in order to provide optimum conditions for ablation. The treatment was successfully completed and she was discharged home the following day. High-frequency jet ventilation is regularly used in our institution for adult computed tomography-guided treatments and to our knowledge, this application has not been described yet in a child this young. Our experience suggests that this technique can be safely used in paediatric patients, though further investigation of the optimum parameters for in-circuit high-frequency jet ventilation in this population is warranted.

Safety and oncological outcome following radiofrequency ablation of small renal masses in a single center

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small renal masses (SRMs) at a large single-institution center during a period of 12 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 118 patients underwent RFA for SRM between July 2006 and July 2018 at our institution. We included demographic information, comorbidity, procedural details, and oncological outcome in the analysis. Survival analysis was performed using competing risk.

RESULTS

87 males and 31 females with median age 66 years underwent RFA. Median tumor size was 23 mm. Tumor biopsy was performed in 94% of cases, of which 56% were confirmed renal cell carcinoma (RCCs). Twenty-eight patients had benign tumors or underwent treatment for recurrence of prior RCC. Median follow-up of 5 years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5. Major complications occurred in 1.7%. No change in kidney function was observed. The initial treatment response was 98%. Among patients treated for newly diagnosed radiological suspected RCC without Von Hippel-Lindau or benign biopsy (90 pts), the cumulative incidence of radiological recurrence after 5 and 10 years was 6.6% (95% CI: 0.8-12%) and 16% (95% CI: 4.2-28%), respectively. Three patients died of RCC during follow-up. The cumulative incidence of kidney cancer death was 4.5% (95% CI: 4.3-13%) after 10 years. The incidence of other-cause mortality was 50% (95% CI: 34-67%).

CONCLUSION

CT-guided RFA is a safe and effective treatment option for patients unsuitable for surgery. RFA is a good alternative to partial or radical nephrectomy for SRMs, although randomized trials comparing surgery to minimally invasive thermal ablation techniques are missing.

Quantification of contrast-uptake as imaging biomarker for disease progression of renal cell carcinoma after tumor ablation

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) depends greatly on the presence of extra-renal metastases.

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of total tumor volume (TTV) and enhancing tumor volume (ETV) as three-dimensional (3D) quantitative imaging biomarkers for disease aggressiveness in patients with RCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study including 37 patients with RCC treated with image-guided thermal ablation during 2007-2015. TNM stage, RENAL Nephrometry Score, largest tumor diameter, TTV, and ETV were assessed on cross-sectional imaging at baseline and correlated with outcome measurements. The primary outcome was time-to-occurrence of extra-renal metastases and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Correlation was assessed using a Cox regression model and differences in outcomes were shown by Kaplan-Meier plots with significance and odds ratios (OR) calculated by Log-rank test/generalized Wilcoxon and continuity-corrected Woolf logit method.

RESULTS

Patients with a TTV or ETV > 5 cm³ were more likely to develop distant metastases compared to patients with TTV (OR 6.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-134.4, P=0.022) or ETV (OR 8.48, 95% CI 0.42-170.1, P=0.016) < 5 cm³. Additionally, PFS was significantly worse in patients with larger ETV (P = 0.039; median PFS 51.87 months vs. 69.97 months). In contrast, stratification by median value of the established, caliper-based measurements showed no significant correlation with outcome parameters.

CONCLUSION

ETV, as surrogate of lesion vascularity, is a sensitive imaging biomarker for occurrence of extra-renal metastatic disease and PFS in patients with RCC.

Local ablation vs partial nephrectomy in T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

Objective

To compare the survival outcomes of local ablation (LA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) for T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Method

We identified 38,155 T1N0M0 RCC patients treated with PN or LA in 2004‐2016 from the retrospective Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases. Among them, there were 4656 LA and 33,499 PN. A Cox proportional hazards regression model, cause‐specific Cox regression and Fine and Gray sub‐distribution hazard ratio (sHR) with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusting was utilized to compare the effects of LA vs PN on all‐, RCC‐, and non‐RCC–caused mortality.

Results

Within the IPTW analysis, patients who underwent PN experienced a better overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.40‐1.74; P < .001) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) (HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.62‐2.98; P < .001) than LA patients. In the subgroup of patients >85 years (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.73‐1.79, P = .577), chromophobe RCC (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.94‐3.00, P = .078), and tumor size <2 cm (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.95‐1.53, P = .126), the OS showed no significant difference between LA and PN. No significant difference in CSS between LA and PN was observed in the subgroup of chromophobe RCC (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.03‐3.97, P = .389), and tumor size <2 cm (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 0.92‐3.64, P = .084). For patients >85 years (sHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.52‐1.27, P = .520) and tumor size <2 cm (sHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.94‐1.38, P = .200), the non‐RCC–specific mortality was not significantly different in PN and LA cohorts, however, for the chromophobe RCC, the LA showed a worse non‐RCC mortality than PN (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.06‐2.79, P = .028).

Conclusion

PN showed a better prognosis than LA in T1N0M0 RCC treatment, but LA and PN showed a comparable OS in elderly patients (>85), small RCC (<2 cm) and chromophobe RCC.

Percutaneous ablation techniques for renal cell carcinoma: current status and future trends

Percutaneous ablation is an increasingly applied technique for the treatment of localized renal tumors, especially for elderly or co-morbid patients, where co-morbidities increase the risk of traditional nephrectomy. Ablative techniques are technically suited for the treatment of tumors generally not exceeding 4 cm, which has been set as general consensus cutoff and is described as the upper threshold of T1a kidney tumors. This threshold cutoff is being challenged, but with still limited evidence. Percutaneous ablation techniques for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) include radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, laser or microwave ablation; the main advantage of all these techniques over surgery is less invasiveness, lower complication rates and better patient tolerability. Currently, international guidelines recommend percutaneous ablation either as intervention for frail patients or as a first line tool, provided that the tumor can be radically ablated. The purpose of this article is to describe the basic concepts of percutaneous ablation in the treatment of RCC. Controversies concerning techniques and products and the need for patient-centered tailored approaches during selection among the different techniques available will be discussed.

Comparative outcomes of radio frequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumors: a systematic review

Background

The role of radio frequency ablation (RFA) in small renal tumors remains controversial. This systematic review was performed to compare clinical outcomes of RFA versus partial nephrectomy (PN) for the treatment of T1 renal tumors.

Methods

A total of 11 studies including 2,397 patients were analyzed in this systematic review after searching the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. P value and odds ratio (OR)/hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the strength of the association.

Results

A total of six studies (2,056 patients) provided either survival curves or HR and its 95% CI, demonstrating that the majority of the patients with RFA treatment tended to exhibit a similar long-term survival rate to those with PN treatment. In addition, according to four studies, no differences were found in the overall rate of complications between the two groups. Furthermore, there were significant differences in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) change between the two methods in four studies but no differences were observed in other two.

Conclusions

Our systematic review indicated that RFA is an effective treatment option which could provide comparable oncologic outcomes to PN. Moreover, it may present obvious advantages in renal function preservation.

Renal Function Loss After Cryoablation of Small Renal Masses in Solitary Kidneys: European Registry for Renal Cryoablation Multi-Institutional Study

Objectives: To estimate and quantify the loss of kidney function in solitary kidneys with small renal masses (SRMs) after laparoscopy-assisted renal cryoablation (LARC), from the European Registry for Renal Cryoablation (EuRECA) database. Patients and Methods: Of the 808 patients from eight European centers in the database, 102 patients had SRMs in solitary kidneys. Patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Charlson comorbidity index, and tumor characteristics including nephrometry (PADUA) score where available were collected. Renal function data in the form of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stratification both preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively were collected. Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 67 (59-81) years, the median (IQR) BMI was 26 (23.9-28.9) kg/m², and the median (IQR) ASA score was 2 (2-3). The median Charlson score was 4 (range: 0-10). The median (IQR) tumor size in cross-sectional imaging was 26 (19-38) mm. The follow-up data were available for 72 patients with a median follow-up for this group of 38 (range: 10-132) months. The mean preoperative eGFR was 55.0 mL/minute/1.73 m² (standard deviation [SD] = 18.1), and the mean postoperative eGFR was 51.8 mL/minute/1.73 m² (SD = 18.8). The change was -3.1 mL/minute/1.73 m² (95% confidence interval -5.2 to -1.0) units, which was statistically significant (p = 0.004). The change in the CKD stages comparing before and after LARC was not significant (paired two-tailed t-test, p = 0.06). Critically, the decrease in the eGFR did not translate to any significant adverse outcome and zero patients required dialysis. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study of renal function after LARC in SRMs in solitary kidneys. Cryotherapy in this imperative situation is safe, carries clinically insignificant reduction in renal function, therefore providing an option to minimize the risk of developing renal failure necessitating dialysis.

Imaging of Small Renal Masses before and after Thermal Ablation

Thermal ablation of small renal masses is increasingly accepted as an alternative to partial nephrectomy, particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities. Many professional societies support this alternate treatment with updated guidelines. Before performing thermal ablation, it is important to stratify risk and assess technical feasibility by evaluating tumor imaging features such as size, location, and centrality. Routine postablation imaging with CT or MRI is necessary for assessment of residual or recurrent tumor, evidence of complications, or new renal masses outside the ablation zone. The normal spectrum and evolution of findings at CT and MRI include a halo appearance of the ablation zone, ablation zone contraction, and ablation zone calcifications. Tumor recurrence frequently manifests at CT or MRI as new nodular enhancement at the periphery of an expanding ablation zone, although it is normal for the ablation zone to enlarge within the first few months. Recognizing early tumor recurrence is important, as small renal masses are often easily treated with repeat ablations. Potential complications of thermal ablation include vascular injury, urine leak, ureteral stricture, nerve injury, and bowel perforation. The risk of these complications may be related to tumor size and location.^©RSNA, 2019.

Trends in Percutaneous Thermal Ablation Therapies in the Treatment of T1a Renal Cell Carcinomas Rather than Partial Nephrectomy/Radical Nephrectomy

With the increased incidence of stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has come the recognition that these lesions tend to be low grade and slow growing, with low probability of metastasis not necessarily requiring surgery. As alternatives to surgery, both active surveillance and ablation have been advocated for the management of selected patients with stage T1a renal cancers due to slow rate of tumor growth and low metastatic potential based on recent epidemiological studies. Thermal ablation also has consistently reported favorable complication and renal preservation rates compared with surgical approaches. However, most studies are single-center case series and meta-analysis of these series and comparative prospective series with long-term follow-up are lacking. The purpose of this article is to review the principal thermal ablation modalities and oncological outcomes for the treatment of stage T1 RCCs with long-term follow-up.

Cone-Beam CT-Assisted Ablation of Renal Tumors: Preliminary Results

INTRODUCTION

Renal ablation is a recognized treatment modality for small renal masses. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) has been recently used in interventional oncology as a promising new guidance device, but this technology still needs to be validated for renal ablations. We aimed to assess the technical success of CBCT applications in renal ablative treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2016 and June 2018, 14 patients (mean age 69, range 54-83, 7F, 7M) underwent 21 renal ablations for histologically proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC). All treatments were performed with ultrasound (US) and CBCT guidance under general anesthesia in a dedicated angiography room setting. CBCT was mainly used to assess needle placement and to exclude complications at the end of the procedure. In two small lesions (< 1 cm), pre-acquired CBCT was co-registered with real-time US to obtain a US-CBCT fusion image guidance for tumor ablation.

RESULTS

Whether used alone or in combination with other imaging modalities, CBCT was proven to be technically successful in all 21 procedures to guide or assist tumor ablation. A primary technical efficacy of thermal ablation was achieved in 19/21 ablations (90.1%) at 1 month. Mean procedure duration was 100.2 min (range 160-64). Mean length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-10 days). All patients are still under active surveillance for a mean follow-up of 14.5 months (range 4-26 months).

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT for renal ablation guidance is a viable tool. Larger series are needed to compare it to MDCT.

Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 1-organ-sparing procedures in renal and adrenal tumors: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for the kidney and adrenals has emerged as the need for preservation of function is paramount in patients with poor functional reserve. As reports increasingly showed that oncological outcomes were equivalent to radical excision, elective OSS became a viable alternative in patients with otherwise normal reserve. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of OSS for adrenal and renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library Central Search were searched for recently published articles up to December 2017. The following keywords were used; "partial adrenalectomy", "adrenal sparing", "partial nephrectomy", "nephron sparing", "kidney/renal cancer".

RESULTS

Partial adrenalectomy became an attractive alternative to total adrenalectomy avoiding adrenal insufficiency. Both minimally invasive surgery and ablative techniques were increasingly reported for adrenal OSS with adequate residual adrenal function and excellent oncological outcome. Radical nephrectomy remained for many years as the gold standard of treatment for organ-confined renal cell carcinoma. As the need to reduce the impact on renal function, more conservative approaches were utilized. Soon, the non-inferiority of nephron-sparing surgery to that of radical excision became evident and elective partial nephrectomy was gaining ground as the standard of care for small renal masses in patients with normal contralateral kidneys.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the current status of OSS in renal and adrenal tumors.

Focal therapy versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the management of clinical T1 renal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RPN) and focal therapy (FT) have both been successfully employed in the management of small renal masses. However, despite this being the era of minimally invasive surgery, few comparative studies exist on RPN and FT. The aim of our study is to review perioperative, renal functional and oncologic outcomes of FT and RPN in cT1 renal masses.

METHODS

Literature published in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 22, 2018, was systematically searched. We included literature comparing outcomes of FT (radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, and irreversible electroporation) and RPN. Studies that reported only on laparoscopic partial nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy, and review articles, editorials, letters, or cost analyses were excluded. In total, data from 1166 patients were included.

RESULTS

From 858 total articles, 7 nonrandomized, observational studies were included. Compared with RPN, FT was associated with a significantly lower decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (weighted mean difference [WMD] -8.06 mL/min/1.73 m; confidence interval [CI] -15.85 to -0.26; P = .04), and lower estimated blood loss (WMD -49.61 mL; CI -60.78 to -38.45; P < .001). However, patients who underwent FT had a significantly increased risk of local recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 9.89; CI 4.24-23.04; P < .001) and distant metastasis (RR 6.42; CI 1.70-24.33; P = .006). However, operative times, lengths of stay, and complication rates were revealed to be similar between FT and RPN.

CONCLUSION

RPN has a substantial advantage in preventing cancer recurrence. However, in the era of minimally invasive surgery, FT has advantages in renal function preservation and less bleeding. Long-term follow-up for survival rates and comparative analysis of microwave ablation and irreversible electroporation are needed to extend FT for patients with significant morbidities and for those who need sufficient renal function preservation with minimal bleeding.

RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : prise en charge du cancer du reinFrench ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Management of kidney cancer

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.004. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.

Can ablation win against partial nephrectomy and become first line therapy in cT1a renal tumours?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, small renal masses account for the largest proportion of renal tumour and small renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Although partial nephrectomy, whenever possible, is recognized as the gold standard for treatment, thermal ablation has gained increasing attention as optional treatment in a population sector harbouring small renal masses/small RCCs. The purpose of this review is to update comparative outcomes between these two options of treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent observational case-control and population-based cohorts applying propensity score or inverse probability treatment weighted methodology adjusting for baseline patient and tumour characteristics, compare outcomes between partial nephrectomy and thermal ablation (both cryotherapy and radiofrequency), radical nephrectomy and thermal ablation and between thermal ablation and nonsurgical management. Most of them focus on T1aRCC.

SUMMARY

Comparative outcomes' evidence is limited to population-based or institutional series adjusted for baseline differences and systematic reviews. With exception of special clinical situations, thermal ablation provides similar estimated 5-year cancer and overall survival with a clear benefit in postoperative outcomes when compared to partial nephrectomy in cT1a older patients. The trade-off is more evident when thermal ablation is compared to radical nephrectomy. The advantages in terms of adverse events persist up to 1 year after treatment. Benefits are less apparent in solitary kidneys and when synchronous bilateral approaches are performed.

Toward the Design of Personalized Continuum Surgical Robots

Robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical systems enable procedures with reduced pain, recovery time, and scarring compared to traditional surgery. While these improvements benefit a large number of patients, safe access to diseased sites is not always possible for specialized patient groups, including pediatric patients, due to their anatomical differences. We propose a patient-specific design paradigm that leverages the surgeon's expertise to design and fabricate robots based on preoperative medical images. The components of the patient-specific robot design process are a virtual reality design interface enabling the surgeon to design patient-specific tools, 3-D printing of these tools with a biodegradable polyester, and an actuation and control system for deployment. The designed robot is a concentric tube robot, a type of continuum robot constructed from precurved, elastic, nesting tubes. We demonstrate the overall patient-specific design workflow, from preoperative images to physical implementation, for an example clinical scenario: nonlinear renal access to a pediatric kidney. We also measure the system's behavior as it is deployed through real and artificial tissue. System integration and successful benchtop experiments in ex vivo liver and in a phantom patient model demonstrate the feasibility of using a patient-specific design workflow to plan, fabricate, and deploy personalized, flexible continuum robots.

Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA) and microwave ablation (MWA) regarding oncologic, perioperative and functional outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE libraries were searched for studies comparing PN, RFA, CRA or MWA and reporting on any-cause or cancer-specific mortality, local recurrence, complications or renal function. Network meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies with 24,077 patients were included. Patients receiving RFA, CRA or MWA were older and had more comorbidities compared with PN. All-cause mortality was higher for CRA and RFA compared with PN (incidence rate ratio IRR = 2.58, IRR = 2.58, p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in cancer-specific mortality were evident. Local recurrence was higher for CRA, RFA and MWA compared with PN (IRR = 4.13, IRR = 1.79, IRR = 2.52, p < 0.05 respectively). A decline in renal function was less pronounced after RFA versus PN, CRA and MWA (mean difference in GFR MD = 6.49; MD = 5.82; MD = 10.89, p < 0.05 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Higher overall survival and local control of PN compared with ablative therapies did not translate into significantly better cancer-specific mortality. Most studies carried a high risk of bias by selecting younger and healthier patients for PN, which may drive superior survival and local control. Physicians should be aware of the lack of high-quality evidence and the potential benefits of ablative techniques for certain patients, including a superior complication profile and renal function preservation.

KEY POINTS

• Patients selected for ablation of small renal masses are older and have more comorbidities compared with those undergoing partial nephrectomy. • Partial nephrectomy yields lower all-cause mortality, which is probably biased by patient selection and does not translate into prolonged cancer-free survival. • The decline of renal function is smallest after radiofrequency ablation for small renal masses.

The Role of Ablation and Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Small Renal Masses

CONTEXT

Nephron-sparing approaches are increasingly recommended for incidental small renal masses. Herein, we review the current literature regarding the safety and efficacy of focal therapy, including percutaneous ablation, for small renal masses.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the application of ablative therapy in the management of small renal masses.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for findings published since 2000 on focal therapy for small renal masses. After literature review, 64 articles were selected and discussed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy are the most widely used procedures with intermediate-term oncological outcome comparable with surgical series. Cost effectiveness seems excellent and side effects appear acceptable. To date, no randomized trial comparing percutaneous focal therapy with standard surgical approach or active surveillance has been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy. Percutaneous ablation has fewer complications and a better postoperative profile when compared with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy.

Is there a role for perfusion imaging in assessing treatment response following ablative therapy of small renal masses-A systematic review

Aims

Ablation therapies are an innovative nephron-sparing alternative to radical nephrectomy for early stage renal cancers, although determination of treatment success is challenging. We aimed to undertake a systematic review of the literature to determine whether assessment of tumour perfusion may improve response assessment or alter clinical management when compared to standard imaging.

Material and Methods

Two radiologists performed independent primary literature searches for perfusion imaging in response assessment following ablative therapies (radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy) focused on renal tumours.

Results

5 of 795 articles were eligible, totaling 110 patients. The study designs were heterogeneous with different imaging techniques, perfusion calculations, reference standard and follow-up periods. All studies found lower perfusion following treatment, with a return of ‘high grade’ perfusion in the 7/110 patients with residual or recurrent tumour. One study found perfusion curves were different between successfully ablated regions and residual tumour.

Conclusions

Studies were limited by small sample size and heterogeneous methodology. No studies have investigated the impact of perfusion imaging on management. This review highlights the current lack of evidence for perfusion imaging in response assessment following renal ablation, however it suggests that there may be a future role. Further prospective research is required to address this.

Image-guided minimally invasive treatment for small renal cell carcinoma

Surgical partial nephrectomy is still considered as the "gold standard" for the definitive management of small malignant renal masses, whereas treatment with image-guided percutaneous ablation is still mainly reserved for those patients who cannot undergo nephron-sparing surgical resection due to advanced age, underlying comorbidities or compromised renal function. Nonetheless, the recent evidence that underlines the long-term oncological equipoise of percutaneous ablation methods with surgical resection in combination with the reduced complication rate and cost supports the use of an image-guided minimally invasive approach as a first-line treatment. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of the most widely used percutaneous renal ablation treatments (radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation) with a focus on their main technical aspects and application techniques for curative ablation of small renal cell carcinoma (stage cT1a). The authors also provide a critical narrative of the relevant medical literature with an emphasis on outcomes of comparative effectiveness research, and appraise the percutaneous methods compared to surgery in the context of evidence-based practice and future research studies.

TEACHING POINTS

• RCC is a common cancer and is increasingly detected incidentally at early stages. • There is long-term oncological equipoise of percutaneous ablation compared to surgical resection. • Large-scale trials are required to produce Level 1a evidence.

RFA versus robotic partial nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched comparison of mid-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

To compare oncological and functional mid-term outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using propensity score-matching.

METHODS

Between December 2008-April 2016, 63 patients from each treatment group were propensity score-matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumour size, tumour laterality, tumour histology, R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Post-treatment follow-up periods for RPN and RFA ranged from 1-90 months (median, 24.6) and 1-65 months (21), respectively. Tumour location, percentage of eGFR preservation and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Exophytic and endophytic RCC occurred in 73.0 % (46/63) and 27.0 % (17/63) of the RPN group, and 52.4 % (33/63) and 47.6 % (30/63) of the RFA group, respectively (p=0.017). There was 91.7 % preservation of eGFR in the RPN group and 86.8 % in the RFA group (p=0.088). Two-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100 % in the RPN and 95.2 % in the RFA group (p=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

RPN provides a higher recurrence-free survival rate than RFA. However, RFA is a better treatment option for an endophytic or recurrent RCC that is difficult to treat with RPN.

KEY POINTS

• RPN provides a higher recurrence-free survival rate than RFA. • Unlike RPN, repeat RFA is easy to perform for recurrent RCC. • Endophytic RCC could be better treated with RFA.

[Ablative therapy in kidney cancer: Oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost]

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of kidney cancer has increased significantly over the past few decades presumably due to the increased use of imaging. The aim of this article is to describe contemporary outcomes of ablative therapy and to compare them to other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional, perioperative outcomes and cost.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, using (MeSH) words; from January 2005 through May 2017, and we looked for all the studies. Investigators graded the strength of evidence in terms of methodology, language and relevance.

RESULTS

Ninety-one articles were analyzed. We described the outcomes of ablative therapy in relation to the energy used and the approach, and compared these outcomes to the other therapeutic options in terms of oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes. We analyzed these studies in order to search for predictive factors influencing the results of ablative therapy. We also analyzed the economic burden of small renal tumor management.

CONCLUSION

The strength of evidence is based almost entirely on retrospective studies and is susceptible to the inherent limitations of this study design. Although, the evidence was low among studies, our revue showed that, in elderly patients treated with ablative therapy for cT1a tumors, the cancer-specific survival was comparable to partial nephrectomy with differences in overall survival that are explained by competing risks of death in the old population. Considering the functional results, the renal function preservation seems to be comparable between the 2 groups while the perioperative morbidity is higher in the partial nephrectomy group. The evidence base medicine at this time cannot support the extension of the indications of ablative therapy beyond the actual implementations.

Renal Cell Carcinoma: Alternative Nephron-Sparing Treatment Options for Small Renal Masses, a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is (partial) nephrectomy. For patients where surgery is not the treatment of choice, for example in the elderly, in case of severe comorbidity, inoperability, or refusal of surgery, alternative treatment options are available. These treatment options include active surveillance (AS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). In the present overview, the efficacy, safety, and outcome of these different options are summarized, particularly focusing on recent developments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases of MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The search was performed in December 2016, and included a search period from 2010 to 2016. The terms and synonyms used were renal cell carcinoma, active surveillance, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The database search identified 2806 records, in total 73 articles were included to assess the rationale and clinical evidence of alternative treatment modalities for small renal masses. The methodological quality of the included articles varied between level 2b and level 4.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatment modalities, such as AS, RFA, CA, MWA, and SBRT, are treatment options especially for those patients who are unfit to undergo an invasive treatment. There are no randomized controlled trials available comparing surgery and less invasive modalities, leading to a low quality on the reported articles. A case-controlled registry might be an alternative to compare outcomes of noninvasive treatment modalities in the future.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy in renal cell carcinoma: From oligometastatic to localized disease

Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) has historically been considered a radioresistant cancer, and radiotherapy was usually delivered with a palliative goal. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) allows the delivery of high doses on small treatment volumes in a safe and effective way, thus opening the doors to new applicationsof radiotherapy both in the treatment of the primary and oligometastasic disease. Aim of the current review is to explore the state of art of SABR in the therapeutic approach to RCC.

Image-guided ablation of renal cell carcinoma

This review article aims to provide an overview of image-guided ablation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) since it was first introduced in 1998. This will cover the background and rationale behind its development; an overview of the evidence for current thermal technology, such as heat-based, e.g., radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cold-based energies, e.g., cryoablation used; and summarise the published evidence regarding its treatment efficacy and oncological outcome. In addition, it aims to provide an insight into the potential role of the new non-thermal ablative technology, e.g., irreversible electroporation (IRE)/Nanoknife in image-guided ablation of RCC, as well as areas of challenge that will require further research and clinical evaluation to ensure delivery of a quality patient-centred interventional oncology (IO) service in image-guided ablation of RCC.

Tips and tricks for a safe and effective image-guided percutaneous renal tumour ablation

Abstract

Image-guide thermal ablations are nowadays increasingly used to provide a minimally invasive treatment to patients with renal tumours, with reported good clinical results and low complications rate. Different ablative techniques can be applied, each with some advantages and disadvantages according to the clinical situation. Moreover, percutaneous ablation of renal tumours might be complex in cases where there is limited access for image guidance or a close proximity to critical structures, which can be unintentionally injured during treatment. In the present paper we offer an overview of the most commonly used ablative techniques and of the most important manoeuvres that can be applied to enhance the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous image-guided renal ablation. Emphasis is given to the different technical aspects of cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation, on the ideal operating room setting, optimal image guidance, application of fusion imaging and virtual navigation, and contrast enhanced ultrasound in the guidance and monitoring of the procedure. Moreover, a series of protective manoeuvre that can be used to avoid damage to surrounding sensitive structures is presented. A selection of cases of image-guided thermal ablation of renal tumours in which the discussed technique were used is presented and illustrated.

Teaching points

• Cryoablation, radiofrequency and microwave ablation have different advantages and disadvantages.

• US, CT, fusion imaging, and CEUS increase an effective image-guidance.

• Different patient positioning and external compression may increase procedure feasibility.

• Hydrodissection and gas insufflation are useful to displace surrounding critical structures.

• Cold pyeloperfusion can reduce the thermal damage to the collecting system.