A prolonged microscopic observation improves detection of underpopulated cells in peripheral blood smears

Pseudo-NRBC in the Mindray BC-6800Plus analyzer: A clue for diagnostic anticipation of fungemia. Experimental and preliminary clinical reports

INTRODUCTION

Candidemia can be a significant cause of death in immunosuppressed or debilitated patients particularly. Abnormalities of the instrumental cytograms of some hematological analyzers, such as Mindray BC-6800Plus, can be related to circulating Candida. We studied the possible diagnostic usefulness of this information.

METHODS

A fungal bloodstream infection has been simulated by adding aliquots of Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida glabrata to 75 leftovers and anonymized peripheral blood samples. Cytographic abnormalities like those of experimental samples were used to select patients with possible fungemia. The microscopic review of peripheral blood smears constituted the confirmatory method.

RESULTS

In all experimental samples, the various Candida types caused pseudo-NRBC and morphological abnormalities of WNB and DIFF cytograms. Circulating blastospores, free or engulfed by neutrophils, were the microscopic findings in the peripheral blood smears. In the clinical verification, 72 patients were recruited based on the presence of an evocative cluster in the WNB and DIFF cytograms. The microscopic review of 39 out of 72 samples was positive for NRBC. According to blood cultures, light microscopy revealed fungal forms of several Candida or non-Candida types in the remaining 33 samples. Nine of these cases were not yet known to suffer from bloodstream infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further confirmatory clinical studies are required for these diagnostic abilities, the BC 6800Plus cytographic abnormalities related to fungemia have proven helpful in rapidly monitoring persistent fungemia in already diagnosed patients. In unknown or undiagnosed cases, they could be the trigger point for the subsequent diagnostic-therapeutic pathway.

Performance of digital morphology analyzer Medica EasyCell assistant

OBJECTIVES

The EasyCell assistant (Medica, Bedford, MA, USA) is one of the state-of-the-art digital morphology analyzers. We explored the performance of EasyCell assistant in comparison with manual microscopic review and Pentra DX Nexus (Horiba ABX Diagnostics, Montpellier, France).

METHODS

In a total of 225 samples (100 normal and 125 abnormal samples), white blood cell (WBC) differentials and platelet (PLT) count estimation by EasyCell assistant were compared with the results by manual microscopic review and Pentra DX Nexus. The manual microscopic review was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (H20-A2).

RESULTS

WBC differentials between pre-classification by EasyCell assistant and manual counting showed moderate correlations for neutrophils (r=0.58), lymphocytes (r=0.69), and eosinophils (r=0.51) in all samples. After user verification, they showed mostly high to very high correlations for neutrophils (r=0.74), lymphocytes (r=0.78), eosinophils (r=0.88), and other cells (r=0.91). PLT count by EasyCell assistant highly correlated with that by Pentra DX Nexus (r=0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of EasyCell assistant for WBC differentials and PLT count seems to be acceptable even in abnormal samples with improvement after user verification. The EasyCell assistant, with its reliable performance on WBC differentials and PLT count, would help optimize the workflow of hematology laboratories with reduced workload of manual microscopic review.

Digital assessment of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate smears

The diagnosis of benign and neoplastic hematologic disorders relies on analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate smears. As demonstrated by the widespread laboratory adoption of hematology analyzers for automated assessment of peripheral blood, digital analysis of these samples provides many significant benefits compared to relying solely on manual review. Nonetheless, analogous instruments for digital bone marrow aspirate smear assessment have yet to be clinically implemented. In this review, we first provide a historical overview detailing the implementation of hematology analyzers for digital peripheral blood assessment in the clinical laboratory, including the improvements in accuracy, scope, and throughput of current instruments over prior generations. We also describe recent research in digital peripheral blood assessment, particularly in the development of advanced machine learning models that may soon be incorporated into commercial instruments. Next, we provide an overview of recent research in digital assessment of bone marrow aspirate smears and how these approaches could soon lead to development and clinical adoption of instrumentation for automated bone marrow aspirate smear analysis. Finally, we describe the relative advantages and provide our vision for the future of digital assessment of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate smears, including what improvements we can soon expect in the hematology laboratory.

Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1

OBJECTIVES

CellaVision DC-1 (DC-1, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) is a newly launched digital morphology analyzer that was developed mainly for small to medium-volume laboratories. We evaluated the precision, qualitative performance, comparison of cell counts between DC-1 and manual counting, and turnaround time (TAT) of DC-1.

METHODS

Using five peripheral blood smear (PBS) slides spanning normal white blood cell (WBC) range, precision and qualitative performance of DC-1 were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP15-A3, EP15-Ed3-IG1, and EP12-A2 guidelines. Cell counts of DC-1 and manual counting were compared according to the CLSI EP 09C-ED3 guidelines, and TAT of DC-1 was also compared with TAT of manual counting.

RESULTS

DC-1 showed excellent precision (%CV, 0.0-3.5%), high specificity (98.9-100.0%), and high negative predictive value (98.4-100.0%) in 18 cell classes (12 WBC classes and six non-WBC classes). However, DC-1 showed 0% of positive predictive value in seven cell classes (metamyelocytes, myelocytes, promyelocytes, blasts, plasma cells, nucleated red blood cells, and unidentified). The largest absolute mean differences (%) of DC-1 vs. manual counting was 2.74. Total TAT (min:s) was comparable between DC-1 (8:55) and manual counting (8:55).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that comprehensively evaluated the performance of DC-1 including its TAT. DC-1 has a reliable performance that can be used in small to medium-volume laboratories for assisting PBS review. However, DC-1 may make unnecessary workload for cell verification in some cell classes.

Multicentric evaluation of the variability of digital morphology performances also respect to the reference methods by optical microscopy

INTRODUCTION

Despite the important diagnostic role of peripheral blood morphology, cell classification is subjective. Automated image-processing systems (AIS) provide more accurate and objective morphological evaluation. The aims of this multicenter study were the evaluation of the intra and inter-laboratory variation between different AIS in cell pre-classification and after reclassification, compared with manual optical microscopy, the reference method.

METHODS

Six peripheral blood samples were included in this study, for each sample, 70 May-Grunwald and Giemsa stained PB smears were prepared from each specimen and 10 slides were delivered to the seven laboratories involved. Smears were processed by both optical microscopy (OM) and AIS. In addition, the assessment times of both methods were recorded.

RESULTS

Within-laboratory Reproducibility ranged between 4.76% and 153.78%; between-laboratory Precision ranged between 2.10% and 82.2%, while Total Imprecision ranged between 5.21% and 20.60%. The relative Bland Altman bias ranged between -0.01% and 20.60%. The mean of assessment times were 326 ± 110 s and 191 ± 68 s for AIS post reclassification and OM, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AIS can be helpful when the number of cell counted are low and can give advantages in terms of efficiency, objectivity and time saving in the morphological analysis of blood cells. They can also help in the interpretation of some morphological features and can serve as learning and investigation tools.

How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?

Digital morphology (DM) analyzers are widely applied in clinical practice. It is necessary to evaluate performances of DM analyzers by focusing on leukopenic samples. We evaluated the analytical performance, including precision, of a Sysmex DI-60 system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) on white blood cell (WBC) differentials in leukopenic samples. In a total of 40 peripheral blood smears divided into four groups according to WBC count (normal, mild, moderate, and severe leukopenia; each group n = 10), we evaluated precision of WBC preclassificaiton by DI-60. %coefficients of variation (%CVs) of precision varied for each sample and for each cell class; the fewer cells per slide, the higher %CV. The overall specificity and efficiency were high for all cell classes except plasma cells (95.9-99.9% and 90.0-99.4%, respectively). The largest absolute value of mean difference between DI-60 and manual count in each group was: 10.77, normal; 10.22, mild leukopenia; 19.09, moderate leukopenia; 47.74, severe leukopenia. This is the first study that evaluated the analytical performance of DI-60 on WBC differentials in leukopenic samples as the main subject. DI-60 showed significantly different performance depending on WBC count. DM analyzers should be evaluated separately in leukopenic samples, even if the overall performance was acceptable.

Mindray BC-6800 haematological analyser: 3D-DIFF scattergram usefulness in infectious mononucleosis diagnosis

INTRODUCTION

3D-DIFF scattergram of the Mindray BC-6800 haematological analyser shows morphological abnormalities and lymphocyte cluster splitting related to the presence of reactive lymphocytes. This study aims to assess whether these cytographic changes are useful in detecting both activated and apoptotic lymphocytes, leading to an improvement in the laboratory diagnostic process of infectious mononucleosis.

METHODS

Two hundred three samples with modified shape and doubled lymphocyte cluster of DIFF scattergram (study group) were divided into two different subgroups: with and, respectively, without serological evidence of ongoing IM. Activated and apoptotic cells in peripheral blood were counted by light microscopy or gating in the instrumental dot plots. Values of apoptotic cells counted by microscopy were compared with those resulting from gating.

RESULTS

Samples with both shape change and doubled lymphocyte cluster had serological profiles according to the diagnosis of ongoing infectious mononucleosis. Blood smears review was positive for reactive lymphocytes in all 112 samples (100%). An underestimation of apoptotic cell count by light microscopy compared with the gating in the instrumental scatterplot was also observed (96 out of 112, 85.7%).

CONCLUSION

The additional lymphocyte cluster was significantly associated with activated and apoptotic lymphocytes in samples with serology suggesting ongoing infectious mononucleosis. Considering the significance of clue for infectious mononucleosis assigned to the apoptotic lymphocytes, a specific flag such as "apoptotic cells?" could be associate with the related cluster. Such a flag could be used for dedicated rules for smears review, thus increasing infectious mononucleosis detection in laboratories that do not usually practise instrumental cytograms observation.