Asian race and origin have no clinically meaningful effects on polatuzumab vedotin pharmacokinetics in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

A translational physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for MMAE-based antibody-drug conjugates

The objective of this work was to develop a translational physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), using monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE)-based ADCs. A previously established dual-structured whole-body PBPK model for MMAE-based ADCs in mice was scaled to higher species (i.e., rats and monkeys) and humans. Species-specific physiological and drug-related parameters for the payload and antibody backbone of ADCs were obtained from literature. Parameters associated with payload release, including the deconjugation rate, were optimized using an allometric scaling approach, and antibody degradation rate was adjusted to account for the enhanced clearance of ADCs due to conjugation across different species. The translational PBPK model predicted the PK profiles for various ADC analytes in rats, monkeys, and humans reasonably well. The optimized PBPK model suggested decreased rate of deconjugation for ADCs in higher species, whereas the effects of payload conjugation on ADC clearance were more pronounced in higher species and humans. The translational PBPK model presented here may enable prediction of different ADC analyte PK at the site-of-action, offering valuable insights for the development of exposure-response relationships for ADCs. The modeling framework presented here can also serve as a platform for the development of PBPK model for other ADCs.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A phase III bridging study in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) have limited treatment options and poor outcomes.

METHODS

This phase III study (NCT04236141) evaluated the efficacy and safety of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab (Pola+BR) versus BR in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL to support regulatory submission in China. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Pola+BR or placebo+BR. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) at the end of treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

RESULTS

Overall, 42 patients were analyzed (Pola+BR, n = 28; placebo+BR, n = 14). At data cutoff (July 12, 2021; median follow-up: 7.5 months), CR at EOT was 25.0% (7/28) with Pola+BR and 14.3% (2/14) with placebo+BR, 10.7% difference [95% confidence interval (CI): -19.0, 40.4]. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 4.6 (95%CI: 3.1-6.4) months with Pola+BR and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.9-4.6) months with placebo+BR, with a 50% reduction in risk of progression or death (unstratified hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.24-1.05). The median overall survival was 10.6 [95% CI: 5.5-not evaluable (NE)] and 6.5 (95% CI: 6.0-NE) months, with a 45% reduction in risk of death. The incidence of Grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between Pola+BR (20/27 patients, 74.1%) and placebo+BR arms (11/14 patients, 78.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy findings were consistent with results of the GO29365 study (NCT02257567); treatment with Pola+BR led to clinically meaningful improvements in response rates in Chinese patients with transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL with no new safety signals.

Clinical pharmacology strategies to accelerate the development of polatuzumab vedotin and summary of key findings

The favorable benefit-risk profile of polatuzumab vedotin, as demonstrated in a pivotal Phase Ib/II randomized study (GO29365; NCT02257567), coupled with the need for effective therapies in relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), prompted the need to accelerate polatuzumab vedotin development. An integrated, fit-for-purpose clinical pharmacology package was designed to support regulatory approval. To address key clinical pharmacology questions without dedicated clinical pharmacology studies, we leveraged non-clinical and clinical data for polatuzumab vedotin, published clinical data for brentuximab vedotin, a similar antibody-drug conjugate, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic and population pharmacokinetic modeling approaches. We review strategies and model-informed outcomes that contributed to regulatory approval of polatuzumab vedotin plus bendamustine and rituximab in R/R DLBCL. These strategies made polatuzumab vedotin available to patients earlier than previously possible; depending on the strength of available data and the regulatory/competitive environment, they may also prove useful in accelerating the development of other agents.

Ethnic sensitivity assessment: Polatuzumab vedotin pharmacokinetics in Asian and non-Asian patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in POLARIX

This ethnic sensitivity analysis used data from the phase III POLARIX study (NCT03274492) to assess polatuzumab vedotin pharmacokinetics (PKs) in Asian versus non-Asian patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and examined the appropriateness of extrapolating global study findings to Asian patients. PK and population PK (PopPK) analyses assessed polatuzumab vedotin analyte exposures by ethnicity (Asian [n = 84] vs. non-Asian [n = 345] patients) and region (patients enrolled from Asia [n = 80] vs. outside Asia [n = 349]). In patients from Asia versus outside Asia, observed mean antibody-conjugated monomethyl auristatin E (acMMAE) concentrations were comparable (1.2% lower at cycle [C]1 postdose, 4.4% higher at C4 predose; and 6.8% lower at C4 postdose in patients from Asia). Observed mean unconjugated MMAE was lower in patients from Asia by 6.5% (C1 postdose), 20.0% (C4 predose), and 15.3% (C4 postdose). In the PopPK analysis, C6 area under the curve and peak plasma concentrations were also comparable for acMMAE (6.3% and 3.0% lower in Asian vs. non-Asian patients, respectively) and lower for unconjugated MMAE by 19.1% and 16.7%, respectively. By region, C6 mean acMMAE concentrations were similar, and C6 mean unconjugated MMAE concentrations were lower, in patients enrolled from Asia versus outside Asia, by 3.9%-7.0% and 17.3%-19.7%, respectively. In conclusion, polatuzumab vedotin PKs were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients by ethnicity and region, suggesting PKs are not sensitive to Asian ethnicity and dose adjustments are not required in Asian patients to maintain efficacy and safety.

The molecular rationale for the combination of polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets the B-cell antigen CD79b and delivers monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). It is approved in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (Rit) for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). Understanding the molecular basis of Pola combination therapy with Rit, the key component for the treatment of DLBCL, is important to establish the effective treatment strategies against r/r DLBCL. Here, we examined the rationale for the combination of Pola with Rit using Pola-refractory cells. We found that treatment with Pola increased CD20 expression and sensitivity to Rit-induced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) in several Pola-refractory cells. Pola treatment increased phosphorylation of AKT and ERK and both AKT- and MEK-specific inhibitors attenuated the Pola-induced increase of CD20 and CDC sensitivity, suggesting that these phosphorylation events were required for this combination efficacy. It was revealed that anti-CD79b antibody increased the phosphorylation of AKT but inhibited the phosphorylation of ERK. In contrast, MMAE potentiated phosphorylation of ERK but slightly attenuated the phosphorylation of AKT. Pola also increased CD20 expression on Pola-refractory xenografted tumours and significantly enhanced antitumour activity in combination with Rit. In conclusion, these results could provide a novel rationale for the combination of Pola plus Rit.

A phase 2 study of polatuzumab vedotin + bendamustine + rituximab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Polatuzumab vedotin (pola) is a CD79b‐targeted antibody‐drug conjugate delivering a potent antimitotic agent (monomethyl auristatin E) to B cells. This was an open‐label, single‐arm study of pola 1.8 mg/kg, bendamustine 90 mg/m², rituximab 375 mg/m² (pola + BR) Q3W for up to six cycles in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received ≥1 prior line of therapy and were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or experienced treatment failure with prior ASCT. Primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) at the end of the treatment (EOT) by positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET‐CT) using modified Lugano Response Criteria. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Thirty‐five patients (median age 71 [range 46‐86] years) were enrolled. Twenty‐three (66%) patients had refractory disease, and 23 (66%) had ≥2 prior lines of therapy. At a median follow‐up of 5.4 (0.7‐11.9) months, patients received a median of five treatment cycles. CRR was 34.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.1‐52.2) at EOT. Overall response rate was 42.9% at EOT, and median progression‐free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.6‐not evaluable). Median overall survival was not reached. No fatal adverse events (AEs) were observed. Grade 3‐4 AEs were mainly hematological: anemia (37%), neutropenia (31%), white blood cell count decreased (23%), thrombocytopenia/platelet count decreased/neutrophil count decreased (20% each), and febrile neutropenia (11%). Grade 1‐2 peripheral neuropathy (PN; sensory and/or motor) was reported in 14% of patients; there were no ≥grade 3 PN events. This study (JapicCTI‐184048) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pola + BR in Japanese patients with R/R DLBCL who were ineligible for ASCT.