Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC), irinotecan (CPT-11), and SN-38 in nonhuman primates

An Elusive Target: Inhibitors of JC Polyomavirus Infection and Their Development as Therapeutics for the Treatment of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare demyelinating disease caused by infection with JC Polyomavirus (JCPyV). Despite the identification of the disease and isolation of the causative pathogen over fifty years ago, no antiviral treatments or prophylactic vaccines exist. Disease onset is usually associated with immunosuppression, and current treatment guidelines are limited to restoring immune function. This review summarizes the drugs and small molecules that have been shown to inhibit JCPyV infection and spread. Paying attention to historical developments in the field, we discuss key steps of the virus lifecycle and antivirals known to inhibit each event. We review current obstacles in PML drug discovery, including the difficulties associated with compound penetrance into the central nervous system. We also summarize recent findings in our laboratory regarding the potent anti-JCPyV activity of a novel compound that antagonizes the virus-induced signaling events necessary to establish a productive infection. Understanding the current panel of antiviral compounds will help center the field for future drug discovery efforts.

Irinotecan-Associated Dysarthria in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Single Site Experience

BACKGROUND Irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent used to treat multiple malignancies, including those of colorectal, pancreatic, cervical, esophageal, gastric, and lung origin. Dysarthria, a state of difficult or unclear articulation of speech, has been reported as a rare side effect of irinotecan through multiple case reports and case series, but with limited published data aimed at understanding the underlying mechanism and effective management strategies. CASE REPORT We describe herein 3 cases of patients with pancreatic malignancy who experienced dysarthria while being treated with a chemotherapy regimen containing irinotecan at an ambulatory outpatient satellite chemotherapy site. All patients described received first-line FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic cancer and experienced dysarthria during their first infusion of irinotecan. In all cases, dysarthria was observed as a transient adverse drug reaction within the first 10 to 70 min of irinotecan infusion, which resolved rapidly upon pausing infusion without any long-term sequalae. All patients remained conscious and alert; physical and neurological examinations at dysarthria onset revealed no abnormalities. Some patients experienced distal extremity paresthesia, a known manifestation of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity, and diaphoresis and nausea. Increased infusion time effectively prevented dysarthria during subsequent infusions. CONCLUSIONS Oncologists, pharmacists, nurses, and other care team members should be aware that irinotecan-associated dysarthria is a rare, mild, and self-limiting phenomenon to avoid inadvertently altering or withholding therapy. We suggest extending irinotecan infusion time, as opposed to dose reduction or treatment discontinuation, as a practical clinical management strategy for patients who develop recurrent dysarthria secondary to irinotecan infusion.

How to Make Anticancer Drugs Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier to Treat Brain Metastases

The incidence of brain metastases has increased in the last 10 years. However, the survival of patients with brain metastases remains poor and challenging in daily practice in medical oncology. One of the mechanisms suggested for the persistence of a high incidence of brain metastases is the failure to cross the blood-brain barrier of most chemotherapeutic agents, including the more recent targeted therapies. Therefore, new pharmacological approaches are needed to optimize the efficacy of anticancer drug protocols. In this article, we present recent findings in molecular data on brain metastases. We then discuss published data from pharmacological studies on the crossing of the blood-brain barrier by anticancer agents. We go on to discuss future developments to facilitate drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier for the treatment of brain metastases among cancer patients, using physical methods or physiological transporters.

Irinotecan-associated dysarthria: A single institution case series with management implications in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies

Irinotecan (Camptosar^©, CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is a commonly used cytotoxic chemotherapeutic in the treatment of multiple malignancies, particularly of gastrointestinal origin. Dysarthria secondary to irinotecan has been described as a rare side effect in a few case reports with limited data to recommend appropriate management. We describe herein a large single institution experience of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who experienced dysarthria while being treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimens (FOLFIRINOX or FOLFIRI+/-bevacizumab). Eighteen patients developed neurological manifestations during irinotecan infusion with the majority ( n = 17) developing dysarthria. Patients also experienced other known side effects including cholinergic effects (abdominal bloating, diarrhea, facial flushing, diaphoresis, and rhinorrhea), nausea, fatigue, perioral paresthesia and musculoskeletal discomfort. The dysarthria occurred as early as with the first infusion of irinotecan ( n = 9), but several patients did not develop symptoms until subsequent infusions (range, 1-6). Dose alterations of irinotecan did not obviously impact the reccurrence or severity of dysarthria. Management strategies included close observation, atropine, slower irinotecan infusion rate, and reassurance. Dysarthria resolved without consequence in all patients within hours of completion of the infusion. Oncologists and pharmacists should be aware of irinotecan-associated dysarthria as a rare, self-limited phenomenon with no long-term sequelae, and appropriately counsel patients and infusion nurses to avoid inadvertently withholding potentially beneficial therapy for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

Irinotecan-induced dysarthria: A case report and review of the literature

Irinotecan-induced dysarthria has been reported in the literature, but the underlying mechanism of this neurotoxicity remains unclear. Here, we present a 35-year-old female with metastatic colon cancer who experienced dysarthria during irinotecan infusion. Her symptoms were decreased and eventually eliminated with subsequent increases in infusion time. When the patient returned to original 90 min infusion time, symptoms were significantly reduced in both severity and duration as compared to the first infusion. We suggest infusion time as a potential intervention for patients experiencing dysarthria, and we review the existing literature, explore treatment options, and discuss proposed mechanisms surrounding this unusual adverse drug reaction.

Blood-brain barrier, cytotoxic chemotherapies and glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumors in adults. The blood brain barrier (BBB) is a major limitation reducing efficacy of anti-cancer drugs in the treatment of GBM patients. Areas covered: Virtually all GBM recur after the first-line treatment, at least partly, due to invasive tumor cells protected from chemotherapeutic agents by the intact BBB in the brain adjacent to tumor. The passage through the BBB, taken by antitumor drugs, is poorly and heterogeneously documented in the literature. In this review, we have focused our attention on: (i) the BBB, (ii) the passage of chemotherapeutic agents across the BBB and (iii) the strategies investigated to overcome this barrier. Expert commentary: A better preclinical knowledge of the crossing of the BBB by antitumor drugs will allow optimizing their clinical development, alone or combined with BBB bypassing strategies, towards an increased success rate of clinical trials.

Preclinical impact of bevacizumab on brain and tumor distribution of irinotecan and temozolomide

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumour in adults. Prognosis of GBM patients is poor with median overall survival around 15 months. Temozolomide is the chemotherapeutic agent used in the standard of care of newly diagnosed GBM patients relying on radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy alone. Irinotecan has shown some efficacy in recurrent malignant gliomas. Bevacizumab has been combined with irinotecan in the treatment of recurrent GBM and with temozolomide in newly diagnosed GBM. As the efficacy of GBM treatments relies on their brain distribution through the blood brain barrier, the aim of the present preclinical work was to study, in in vivo models, the impact of bevacizumab on brain and tumor distribution of temozolomide and irinotecan. Our results show that bevacizumab pre-treatment was associated with a reduced temozolomide brain distribution in tumor-free mice. In tumor bearing mice, bevacizumab increased temozolomide tumor distribution, although not statistically significant. In both tumor-free and tumor-bearing mice, bevacizumab does not modify brain distribution of irinotecan and its metabolite SN-38. Bevacizumab impacts brain distribution of some anti-tumor drugs and potentially their efficacy in GBM. Further studies are warranted to investigate other therapeutic combination.

Distribution and quantification of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38 in colon cancer murine model systems using MALDI MSI

Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of small molecules is a key to assess the mechanism of drug action and evaluate treatment efficacy. The prodrug irinotecan (CPT-11) is widely used for chemotherapeutic treatment of colorectal cancer. CPT-11 requires conversion into its active metabolite SN-38 to exert the desired pharmacological effect. MALDI-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) and MALDI-time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) were performed for detection of CPT-11 and SN-38 in tissue sections from mice post CPT-11 injection. In-depth information was gained about the distribution and quantity of drug compounds in normal and tumor tissue. The prodrug was metabolized, as proven by the detection of SN-38 in liver, kidney and digestive tract. In tumors from genetic mouse models for colorectal cancer (Apc (1638N/wt) x pvillin-Kras (V12G) ), CPT-11 was detected but not the active metabolite. In order to correlate drug distribution relative to vascularization, MALDI data were superimposed with CD31 (PECAM-1) immunohistochemistry. This analysis indicated that intratumoral access of CPT-11 mainly occurred by extravasation from microvessels. The present study exploits the power of MALDI MSI in drug analysis, and presents a novel approach to monitor drug distribution in relation to vessel functionality in preclinical and clinical research.

Synergistic interactions between camptothecin and EGFR or RAC1 inhibitors and between imatinib and Notch signaling or RAC1 inhibitors in glioblastoma cell lines

PURPOSE

The current treatment strategies for glioblastoma have limited health and survival benefits for the patients. A common obstacle in the treatment is chemoresistance. A possible strategy to evade this problem may be to combine chemotherapeutic drugs with agents inhibiting resistance mechanisms. The aim with this study was to identify molecular pathways influencing drug resistance in glioblastoma-derived cells and to evaluate the potential of pharmacological interference with these pathways to identify synergistic drug combinations.

METHODS

Global gene expressions and drug sensitivities to three chemotherapeutic drugs (imatinib, camptothecin and temozolomide) were measured in six human glioblastoma-derived cell lines. Gene expressions that correlated to drug sensitivity or resistance were identified and mapped to specific pathways. Selective inhibitors of these pathways were identified. The effects of six combinations of inhibitors and chemotherapeutic drugs were evaluated in glioblastoma-derived cell lines. Drug combinations with synergistic effects were also evaluated in non-cancerous epithelial cells.

RESULTS

Four drug combinations had synergistic effects in at least one of the tested glioblastoma-derived cell lines; camptothecin combined with gefitinib (epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor) or NSC 23766 (ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 inhibitor) and imatinib combined with DAPT (Notch signaling inhibitor) or NSC 23766. Of these, imatinib combined with DAPT or NSC 23766 did not have synergistic effects in non-cancerous epithelial cells. Two drug combinations had at least additive effects in one of the tested glioblastoma-derived cell lines; temozolomide combined with gefitinib or PF-573228 (focal adhesion kinase inhibitor).

CONCLUSION

Four synergistic and two at least additive drug combinations were identified in glioblastoma-derived cells. Pathways targeted by these drug combinations may serve as targets for future drug development with the potential to increase efficacy of currently used/evaluated chemotherapy.

Efficacy of temozolomide in a central nervous system relapse of neuroblastoma with O 6 -methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation

We describe a case of a 5-year-old girl with central nervous system relapse of neuroblastoma after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Although the brain metastasis was surgically removed, she had a second relapse in the same region with leptomeningeal dissemination despite receiving irinotecan. Administration of temozolomide in addition to irinotecan led to her third complete response and the patient has been in complete response for >24 months. The tumor had no expression of the O -methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene due to promoter methylation. Temozolomide is an attractive candidate treatment in neuroblastoma with methylated MGMT, especially in central nervous system relapsed cases.

Use of FDA approved methamphetamine to allow adjunctive use of methylnaltrexone to mediate core anti-growth factor signaling effects in glioblastoma

Methylnaltrexone (MNTX) was recently FDA approved to treat opiate induced constipation. It happens to also indirectly reduce Src activity. Src is a 54 kDa tyrosine kinase, crucial in signaling of, and link between, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF). Glioblastomas use both EGF and VEGF signaling to enhance growth and neo-angiogenesis. Stem cell sub-fractions of glioblastomas are enriched for high VEGF synthesizing cells so this is a particularly valuable adjunctive target during cytotoxic treatment with drugs like temozolomide. MNTX does not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Methamphetamine (MA) temporarily opens the BBB and therefore may allow methylnaltrexone entry into glioblastoma tissue. MA is FDA approved, marketed to treat attention problems in children. MA-MNTX combination should be tested as glioblastoma treatment adjunct. Temozolomide CSF levels are 10-20% of blood levels. Thus MA may also allow greater brain tissue temozolomide levels yet with lower systemic exposure.

Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma

Malignant glioma is the most commonly occurring primary malignant brain tumor. It is difficult to treat and is usually associated with an inexorable, rapidly fatal clinical course. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical excision are core components in the management of malignant glioma. However, chemotherapy, even with the most active regimens currently available, achieves only modest improvement in overall survival. Novel agents and new approaches to therapy are required to improve clinical outcomes. Irinotecan, a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and an agent with high activity against solid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, is an inhibitor of topoisomerase I, a critical enzyme needed for DNA transcription. Irinotecan crosses the blood-brain barrier and, in preclinical investigations, has demonstrated cytotoxic activity against central nervous system tumor xenografts. Its antitumor activity has also been demonstrated against glioblastoma cells with multidrug resistance. Studies in adult and pediatric patients with recurrent, intractable malignant glioma have evaluated irinotecan as monotherapy and in combination with other agents, including temozolomide, carmustine, thalidomide, and bevacizumab. Studies of irinotecan in combination with other medications, particularly temozolomide and bevacizumab, have yielded promising results. Irinotecan monotherapy has demonstrated efficacy; however, its efficacy appears to be enhanced when used in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. When administered concurrently with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, the dosage must be increased to compensate for enhanced cytochrome CY3A4/5 enzyme activity. Toxicities associated with irinotecan have been manageable; the most important dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhea. Irinotecan-based chemotherapy of malignant glioma merits further study.

A modified surgical procedure for microdialysis probe implantation in the lateral ventricle of a FVB mouse

A modified surgical procedure is described to implant a microdialysis probe to sample ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) in FVB mice. Microdialysis sampling of drugs in vCSF provides insight into drug penetration into the brain across the blood brain barrier (BBB) and the blood CSF barrier (BCB); however, this method has been reported primarily in larger animal species. Implanting a microdialysis probe in the lateral ventricle of a mouse is technically very challenging. The modification consisted of changes in the stereotaxic coordinates and insertion of the cannula and ultimately the probe at a 20 degrees angle. Exact placement of the probe was confirmed using ultrasound (US), micro-computed tomography (CT), and histologic review of serial paraffin sections. Additionally, studies of topotecan CSF penetration in the FVB mouse were conducted. With this modified procedure, the ventricular CSF to plasma AUC ratio of unbound topotecan lactone was greater than that previously reported using conventional methods. We speculate this is due to changes incorporated by the modified procedure that places the probe directly into the lateral ventricle allowing sampling of that discrete compartment. Thus, we propose that this modified procedure for placement of the microdialysis probe is superior to the conventional perpendicular method previously reported.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of karenitecin in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas

Karenitecin is a highly lipophilic camptothecin analogue with a lactone ring that is relatively resistant to inactivating hydrolysis under physiologic conditions. This phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of karenitecin in adults with recurrent malignant glioma (MG), to describe the effects of enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (EIASDs) on its pharmacokinetics, and to obtain preliminary evidence of activity. Karenitecin was administered intravenously over 60 min daily for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks to adults with recurrent MG who had no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen. The continual reassessment method was used to escalate doses, beginning at 1.0 mg/m(2)/day, in patients stratified by EIASD use. Treatment was continued until disease progression or treatment-related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Plasma pharmacokinetics was determined for the first daily dose of karenitecin. Thirty-two patients (median age, 52 years; median KPS score, 90) were accrued. Seventy-eight percent had glioblastoma, and 22% had anaplastic glioma. DLT was reversible neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The MTD was 2.0 mg/m(2) in daggerEIASD patients and 1.5 mg/m(2) in -EIASD patients. The mean (+/-SD) total body clearance of karenitecin was 15.9 +/- 9.6 liters/h/m(2) in daggerEIASD patients and 10.2 +/- 3.5 liters/h/m(2) in -EIASD patients (p = 0.02). No objective responses were observed in 11 patients treated at or above the MTD. The total body clearance of karenitecin is significantly enhanced by the concurrent administration of EIASDs. This schedule of karenitecin, a novel lipophilic camptothecin analogue, has little activity in recurrent MG.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of CNS tumours

Despite aggressive therapy, the majority of primary and metastatic brain tumour patients have a poor prognosis with brief survival periods. This is because of the different pharmacokinetic parameters of systemically administered chemotherapeutic agents between the brain and the rest of the body. Specifically, before systemically administered drugs can distribute into the CNS, they must cross two membrane barriers, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier (BCB). To some extent, these structures function to exclude xenobiotics, such as anticancer drugs, from the brain. An understanding of these unique barriers is essential to predict when and how systemically administered drugs will be transported to the brain. Specifically, factors such as physiological variables (e.g. blood flow), physicochemical properties of the drug (e.g. molecular weight), as well as influx and efflux transporter expression at the BBB and BCB (e.g. adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporters) determine what compounds reach the CNS. A large body of preclinical and clinical research exists regarding brain penetration of anticancer agents. In most cases, a surrogate endpoint (i.e. CSF to plasma area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] ratio) is used to describe how effectively agents can be transported into the CNS. Some agents, such as the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, have high CSF to plasma AUC ratios, making them valid therapeutic options for primary and metastatic brain tumours. In contrast, other agents like the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib, have a low CSF to plasma AUC ratio. Knowledge of these data can have important clinical implications. For example, it is now known that chronic myelogenous leukaemia patients treated with imatinib might need additional CNS prophylaxis. Since most anticancer agents have limited brain penetration, new pharmacological approaches are needed to enhance delivery into the brain. BBB disruption, regional administration of chemotherapy and transporter modulation are all currently being evaluated in an effort to improve therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, since many chemotherapeutic agents are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 3A enzyme system, minimising drug interactions by avoiding concomitant drug therapies that are also metabolised through this system may potentially enhance outcomes. Specifically, the use of non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs and curtailing nonessential corticosteroid use may have an impact.

Chemotherapy in neoplastic meningitis

Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is the result of the diffuse or multifocal localization of cancer cells in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF). NM is more often a late complication of solid tumor or lymphoproliferative malignancies. At present, the goal of therapeutic strategies is palliative and the evaluation of high or low risk is important in identifying which patients could benefit from aggressive treatments such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Given that NM is a cancer complication that can spread throughout the entire subarachnoid space, chemotherapy, whether intrathecal or systemic, is currently considered the best treatment option, but optimal treatment is still controversial. This review summarizes intrathecal and systemic chemotherapeutic options in the treatment of NM and the related toxicities.

Complete response of brain metastases to irinotecan-based chemotherapy

Brain metastases occur in 15-20% of patients with cancer and are generally associated with an overall poor prognosis. Currently, radiotherapy and surgery are the mainstay of palliative therapy for patients with brain metastases, while the role of systemic chemotherapy remains uncertain. In this article, we report complete responses to irinotecan-based chemotherapy in three patients with brain metastases from parotid adenocarcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma and small cell lung cancer. Irinotecan-based chemotherapy may hold promise in treating patients with brain metastases. Further studies are warranted to confirm our observations.

Chemotherapy in brain metastases

The use OF chemotherapy to treat patients with brain metastases has been viewed historically with skepticism. To date, a survival benefit has not been demonstrated with the use of systemic chemotherapy in patients with brain metastases. However, the introduction of novel agents and delivery techniques warrants a reexamination of the role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of brain metastases. Temozolomide has shown encouraging results in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer, and implanted carmustine wafers have demonstrated excellent local tumor control rates. This review discusses clinical data from the past decade with emphasis on trial design, tumor histology, available agents, and multimodality strategies. In addition, delivery techniques that circumvent the blood-brain barrier are reviewed. Although chemotherapy is usually used as a salvage therapy, it may be considered for use in selected patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases. To better evaluate chemotherapy in brain metastases, future trials should evaluate novel agents in the preirradiation setting. Enhanced regional delivery methods warrant further investigation, and Phase III trials of current regimens stratified by histology and by prognostic factors will establish the role of specific chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of patients with brain metastases.

Concomitant administration of bevacizumab, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin: nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetics

Bevacizumab (Avastin) is a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor approved for use in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The Saltz regimen (irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin [LV]) is a first-line treatment for this indication. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of bevacizumab when administered concomitantly with the Saltz regimen to cynomolgus monkeys, and to determine if the pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab, irinotecan, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan), or 5-FU were affected by combined administration. Male cynomolgus monkeys were intravenously administered the Saltz regimen (125 mg/m2 irinotecan, 500 mg/m2 5-FU, 20 mg/m2 LV) alone (n = 4) or concomitantly with 10 mg/kg bevacizumab (n = 5) on days 1 and 8. All animals survived to euthanasia on day 15. Adverse effects associated with the Saltz regimen included diarrhea and neutropenia. Macroscopically, two animals from each group had small thymus glands that correlated microscopically with lymphoid depletion. Myeloid hypoplasia and/or erythroid hyperplasia was observed in the sternal bone marrow of most animals. These effects were considered to be associated with the Saltz regimen; concomitant bevacizumab administration did not alter the severity of these findings. Irinotecan and 5-FU were observed to be rapidly eliminated (t1/2 = 1 h and 0.5 h, respectively). Although the number of animals in each group was small and no statistical comparison between groups was performed, bevacizumab did not affect the disposition of either agent. These results indicate that bevacizumab can be safely administered in combination with the Saltz regimen without pharmacokinetic interaction.

Current treatment of leptomeningeal metastases: systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and symptom management

Treatment of leptomeningeal metastases is multifaceted and includes symptomatic therapy, intrathecal and systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. As the majority of patients have widespread incurable systemic tumor, treatment is predominantly palliative; however, some patients with leukemia, lymphoma or breast cancer may have prolonged remissions and the possibility of cure.

Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues

In order to improve the therapeutic index of camptothecin (CPT) analogues, alternative administration of CPT analogues is being evaluated. Topotecan, irinotecan, rubitecan, lurtotecan and 9-aminocamptothecin have been administered orally with response rates equivalent to that seen after intravenous administration, where applicable. Oral availability and administration of some of the newer CPT analogues, including diflomotecan (BN80915) and grimatecan (ST1481), have also shown promising results. Aerosolisation of liposomal 9-nitrocamptothecin has been studied in patients with advanced malignancies involving the lung, demonstrating systemic antitumour activity. Intrathecal administration of topotecan has been studied in children with refractory neoplastic meningitis. It is well tolerated and associated with some antitumour activity. Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan as consolidation therapy in patients with ovarian cancer has shown promising results. Transdermal administration of rubitecan has been studied in mice. So far, no CPT has been approved for an alternative route of administration.

Camptothecin analogs (irinotecan or topotecan) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide as preparative regimens for antibody-based immunotherapy in resistant neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

We used high-dose cyclophosphamide plus topotecan/vincristine (CTV) or irinotecan (C/I) in patients with resistant neuroblastoma. The aim was to use a regimen with little risk to major organs to (a) achieve or consolidate remission in heavily treated patients and to (b) induce an immunological state conducive to passive immunotherapy with the murine 3F8 antibody.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

CTV and C/I included cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg ( approximately 4200 mg/m(2)). With CTV, topotecan 2 mg/m(2) was infused i.v. (30 min) on days 1-4 (total, 8 mg/m(2)), and vincristine 0.067 mg/kg was injected on day 1. With C/I, irinotecan, 50 mg/m(2) was infused i.v. (1 h) on days 1-5 (total, 250 mg/m(2)). Mesna and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received 38 courses of CTV, and 26 patients received 38 courses of C/I. All patients had previously received topotecan, a hemopoietic stem-cell transplant, and/or high-dose cyclophosphamide. CTV and C/I caused myelosuppression of comparably prolonged duration as follows: absolute neutrophil counts <500/ micro l lasted 5-12 days in patients who had not previously received transplant and 7-21 days in patients who were post-transplant. Other significant toxicities included typhlitis (two CTV-treated patients, one C/I-treated patient) and hemorrhagic cystitis (one C/I-treated patient). Major responses were seen in 4 (15%) of 26 CTV and 4 (17%) of 24 C/I-treated patients with assessable disease. Bone marrow disease resolved in 5 (28%) of 18 CTV-treated patients and in 4 (27%) of 15 C/I-treated patients. 3F8 after CTV or C/I was not blocked by neutralizing antibodies, consistent with the desired immunosuppressive effect of high-dose cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSIONS

CTV and C/I require transfusional and antibiotic support but otherwise entail tolerable morbidity. They have modest antineuroblastoma activity in heavily treated patients and are good preparative regimens for passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Malignant Glioma Patients

PURPOSE

Scarce information is available on the brain penetration of temozolomide (TMZ), although this novel methylating agent is mainly used for the treatment of malignant brain tumors. The purpose was to assess TMZ pharmacokinetics in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) along with its inter-individual variability, to characterize covariates and to explore relationships between systemic or cerebral drug exposure and clinical outcomes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

TMZ levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in plasma and CSF samples from 35 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent malignant gliomas. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with nonlinear mixed-effect modeling software. Drug exposure, defined by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in plasma and CSF, was estimated for each patient and correlated with toxicity, survival, and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A three-compartment model with first-order absorption and transfer rates between plasma and CSF described the data appropriately. Oral clearance was 10 liter/h; volume of distribution (V(D)), 30.3 liters; absorption constant rate, 5.8 h(-1); elimination half-time, 2.1 h; transfer rate from plasma to CSF (K(plasma-->CSF)), 7.2 x 10(-4)h(-1) and the backwards rate, 0.76 h(-1). Body surface area significantly influenced both clearance and V(D), and clearance was sex dependent. The AUC(CSF) corresponded to 20% of the AUC(plasma). A trend toward an increased K(plasma-->CSF) of 15% was observed in case of concomitant radiochemotherapy. No significant correlations between AUC in plasma or CSF and toxicity, survival, or progression-free survival were apparent after deduction of dose-effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first human pharmacokinetic study on TMZ to quantify CSF penetration. The AUC(CSF)/AUC(plasma) ratio was 20%. Systemic or cerebral exposures are not better predictors than the cumulative dose alone for both efficacy and safety.

Clinical Evaluation of the Delivery and Safety of Aerosolized Liposomal 9-Nitro-20(S)-Camptothecin in Patients with Advanced Pulmonary Malignancies

PURPOSE

The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of aerosol administration of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, 9-nitrocamptothecin, in a liposome formulation, and to recommend a dosage for a Phase II trial for an 8-week daily treatment schedule.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with primary or metastatic lung cancer received aerosolized liposomal 9-nitrocamptothecin for 5 consecutive days/week for 1, 2, 4, or 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest to determine feasibility. For the Phase I part, the dose was increased stepwise from 6.7 up to 26.6 micro g/kg/day Monday to Friday for 8 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients received treatment. The mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second for all patients was 85% of predicted. A dose-limiting toxicity was chemical pharyngitis seen after 1 week in 2 of 2 patients at 26.6 micro g/kg/day. At 20.0 micro g/kg/day, grade 2 and 3 fatigue prompting a dose reduction was seen after 4 weeks in 2 of 4 patients. Grade 2 toxic effects included nausea/vomiting (9 patients), cough and bronchial irritation (6 patients), fatigue (5 patients), anemia (4 patients), neutropenia (2 patients), anorexia (1 patient), and skin rash around the face mask (1 patient). 9-Nitro-20(S)-camptothecin (9NC) was absorbed systemically. Partial remissions were observed in 2 patients with uterine cancer, and stabilization occurred in 3 patients with primary lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Aerosol administration of liposomal 9NC was found to be feasible and safe. 9NC delivered as an aerosol was detected in patient's plasma shortly after the start of treatment. The recommended dose for Phase II studies is 13.3 micro g/kg/day (equivalent to 0.5 mg/m(2)/day), which constitutes two consecutive 30-min nebulizations/day from a nebulizer reservoir with 4 mg of 9NC in 10 ml of sterile water, Monday to Friday for 8 weeks every 10 weeks.

Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

To assess the antitumour activity and safety profile of irinotecan and its pharmacokinetic interactions with anticonvulsants in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study investigated the effects of irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) given as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks either prior to (group A) or after relapse following radiotherapy (group B) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma. Preferred concomitant medication for seizure prevention was valproic acid. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its main metabolites (SN-38, SN-38-G, APC and NPC) was performed during cycle 1. An independent panel of experts reviewed the activity data.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (25 patients in group A and 27 patients in group B) received a total of 191 cycles of irinotecan. Forty-six patients (22 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B) were evaluable and externally reviewed for activity. According to external review, one partial response (group B), seven minor responses (three in group A and four in group B), 12 disease stabilisations (seven in group A and five in group B) were observed. This resulted in an overall response rate of only 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 6.5%). The median time to tumour progression was 9 weeks in group A and 14.4 weeks in group B. Six-month progression-free survival rates were 26% in group A and 43% in group B. Grade 3-4 toxicities (percentage of patients in groups A and B) consisted of neutropenia (12.5% and 25.9%), diarrhoea (8.3% and 7.4%), asthenia (12.5% and 7.4%) and vomiting (0% and 7.4%). The clearance of irinotecan was 12.4 and 14.4 l/h/m(2) in two patients who received no anticonvulsant. In patients receiving valproic acid, the clearance of irinotecan was 17.2 +/- 4.4 l/h/m(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Irinotecan given at the dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks has limited clinical activity as a single agent in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma after radiotherapy. The toxicity profile and plasma disposition of irinotecan and SN-38 were not strongly influenced by anticonvulsant valproic acid therapy. Although the response rate of irinotecan as a single agent was limited, it remains an attractive drug for combination studies in patients with glioblastoma.

Systemic chemotherapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and symptom management in the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis

Metastasis to the leptomeninges occurs in many common cancers, including leukemia; lung, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers; and tumors of the brain. By way of the flow of cerebrospinal fluid, leptomeningeal metastasis spreads throughout the neuraxis. Consequently, therapy for leptomeningeal metastasis must be directed to the entire central nervous system (CNS). Treatment often consists of involved-field radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and intrathecal chemotherapy. However, because meningeal spread occurs most often in advanced disease, treatment is mainly palliative, except in childhood leukemia, where durable remission has been reported. This article outlines the role of systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Strategies for symptom management in these patients are also described.

The development of camptothecin analogs in childhood cancers

Camptothecin analogs, agents that target the intranuclear enzyme topoisomerase I, represent a promising new class of anticancer drugs for the treatment of childhood cancer. In preclinical studies, camptothecins, such as topotecan and irinotecan, are highly active against a variety of pediatric malignancies including neuroblastomas, rhabdomyosarcomas, gliomas, and medulloblastomas. In this paper, we review the status of completed and ongoing clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies of camptothecin analogs in children. These and future planned studies of this novel class of cytotoxic agents are critical to defining the ultimate role of topoisomerase I poisons in the treatment of childhood cancer.

Effect of P-glycoprotein modulators on the pharmacokinetics of camptothecin using microdialysis

1. By performing microdialysis, this study investigated the pharmacokinetics of unbound camptothecin in rat blood, brain and bile in the presence of P-glycoprotein mediated transport modulators (cyclosporin A, berberine, quercetin, naringin and naringenin). Pharmacokinetic parameters of camptothecin were assessed using a non-compartmental model. 2. Camptothecin rapidly crosses the blood-brain barrier (BBB) within 20 min after camptothecin administration. The disposition of camptothecin in rat bile appeared to have a slow elimination phase and a peak concentration after 20 min of camptothecin administration. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) for camptothecin in bile significantly surpassed that in blood, suggesting active transport of hepatobiliary excretion. 3. In the presence of cyclosporin A camptothecin AUC, in the brain, was significantly elevated but no significant change in the presence of berberine, quercetin, naringin and naringenin. 4. With treatment by smaller doses of quercetin (0.1 mg x kg(-1)), naringin (10 mg x kg(-1)) and naringenin (10 mg x kg(-1)), they significantly diminished the camptothecin AUC in bile, but was not altered by the treatment of berberine (20 mg x kg(-1)), a higher dose of quercetin (10 mg x kg(-1)), and cyclosporin A treated (20 mg x kg(-1)) and pretreated groups. 5. The distribution ratio (AUC(bile)/AUC(blood)) of camptothecin in bile was decreased in the cyclosporin A, quercetin, naringin and naringenin treated groups. However, the distribution ratio in the brain was increased in the cyclosporin A groups, but was decreased in the groups treated with quercetin, naringin and naringenin. These results revealed that P-glycoprotein might modulate hepatobiliary excretion and BBB penetration of camptothecin.

Intrathecal chemotherapy

An unforeseen consequence of improved disease-free survival in many hematologic and solid tumor malignancies has been an increase in the incidence of disease recurrence in the leptomeninges. The recognition of the central nervous system (CNS) as a unique 'sanctuary' site has resulted in the development of therapeutic strategies specifically directed at the leptomeninges. Although therapeutic strategies have been successful in the prevention and treatment of CNS leukemia, there are still a paucity of therapeutic options for patients with neoplastic meningitis due to solid tumors or recurrent CNS leukemia. This article provides an overview of the pharmacology and toxicity of intrathecal agents that are commonly employed in the treatment and prevention of leptomeningeal disease, and describes new agents that are in the early stages of clinical development.

Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues

The binding of camptothecin (CPT) to the DNA-topoisomerase complex is reversible, but it needs to be maintained for maximal inhibitory activity. It is also dependent on the chemical structure of CPT. The lactone form is thought to be necessary for the activity. In human serum, the equilibrium between lactone and carboxylate is in favor of the latter. For these reasons, alternative administration of CPT analogues is being evaluated. The ideal compound would remain in lactone form and would expose the host for long periods of time to its effects. Oral administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) and topotecan (TPT) is discussed by other investigators. We studied oral rubitecan and reported a low lactone to total drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCP) ratio (14.7%), with low plasma concentration over time despite repeated administrations and the presence of an enterohepatic cycle. Aerosolization of a liposomal formulation of rubitecan is currently under study. Six patients have been treated once a day for 5 days every 3 weeks. The dose was 6.7 micrograms/kg/day. Plasma levels are dose for dose higher than those after oral administration, but the ratio of lactone versus total drug is low. No toxicity was observed. The study will continue with increasing doses and lengths of administration. Intrathecal administration of topotecan has been studied in a phase I trial in children. Doses of 0.4 mg are tolerated without toxicity, and clinical responses have been seen in patients with refractory meningial carcinomatosis. Phase II studies are planned. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of topotecan has been studied in a phase I trial as a 24-hour infusion in 5% dextrose at pH 3.5 every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicity is 4 mg/m2. Toxic effects are neutropenia, anemia, emesis, fever, and pain. Five of 10 patients with ascites had symptomatic relief. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrates a second-order kinetics with elimination half-lives of 0.49 and 2.7 hours. The peritoneal to plasma AUC ratio was 31.2. Intramuscular, transdermal, and subcutaneous administrations have been extensively studied in the mouse.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer

Brain is the most common site of metastatic spread in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Approximately 10% of SCLC patients have brain metastases (BM) already at diagnosis and an additional 40% will develop central nervous system (CNS) involvement during their disease course. Although whole brain radiotherapy and corticosteroids is considered the treatment of choice, accumulating evidence suggests that systemic chemotherapy may also play an important role. The concept of the brain as a pharmacologic sanctuary site for established metastases is in contrast with recent clinical observations of frequent BM responses with systemic chemotherapy. During the last decade, several reports about the effect of systemic chemotherapy on BM from SCLC have been published. Pooled data from five studies report 66% response rate (RR) in 64 patients with initial BM. In addition, an average RR of 36% is derived from five studies including 135 patients with delayed BM treated with systemic single agent chemotherapy. Among new drugs with activity in patients with SCLC brain metastases, camptothecin analog topotecan is one of the most promising with a 52% RR. Although whole brain radiation remains the standard treatment of established BM in SCLC there is an emerging role for systemic chemotherapy, particularly with the use of new active drugs as part of combined modality treatments.

Clinical use of topoisomerase I inhibitors in anticancer treatment

The camptothecin analogs topotecan and irinotecan have shown to be among the most effective anticancer agents and, as S-phase specific agents, their antitumor effect is maximized when they are administered in protracted schedules. The documented activity as single agents in many adult and pediatric malignancies has been followed by their use in combination with other anticancer agents. These studies have shown promising results, and have placed topotecan and irinotecan in the first line treatment for some malignancies. However, studies to better determine the optimal schedules and sequence of combinations are needed.

Measurement and pharmacokinetics of unbound 20(S)-camptothecin in rat blood and brain by microdialysis coupled to microbore liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of protein-free camptothecin in blood and brain we implanted microdialysis probes into the jugular vein and striatum of rats for unbound drug sampling and determination. Camptothecin (2 or 5 mg/kg, i.v., n=6) was then administered from the femoral vein, and microdialysates were collected from blood and brain of both sites and assayed by a validated microbore scale high-performance liquid chromatographic method. The mobile phase consisted of methanol-100 mM monosodium phosphoric acid (35:65, v/v, pH 2.5) with a flow-rate 0.05 ml/min. The fluorescence response for camptothecin was observed at excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 and 440 nm, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the corrected data for dialysate concentrations of camptothecin versus time. The results suggest that the pharmacokinetics of unbound camptothecin in blood and brain can be fitted best to a two- and one-compartment model, respectively. Camptothecin rapidly entered the extracellular fluid of brain striatum at 10 min following camptothecin administration.