1
|
Rodepeter FR, Teply-Szymanski J, Romey M, Grass A, Erber R, Lebeau A, Mack EKM, Tarawneh TS, Gremke N, Boekhoff J, Wündisch T, Wagner U, Jank P, Denkert C. [Clinically relevant molecular pathological diagnostics in breast cancer]. PATHOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 44:39-49. [PMID: 36629894 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01175-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
In breast cancer, the current guideline for pathological workup includes recommendations for advanced molecular analysis of certain predictive molecular markers in addition to basic immunohistochemical diagnostics. These markers are determined depending on tumor stage, including sequencing techniques and immunohistochemical methods. This comprises the systematic investigation of molecular alterations such as PIK3CA or BRCA1,2 mutations, NTRK fusions, or microsatellite instability as a basis for targeted therapy. Further alterations, for example in the PI3K pathway, ESR1 alterations, or ERBB2 mutations, may also be relevant for individual therapy decisions especially in the context of resistant or relapsed disease. Thus, particularly in advanced stages, a more comprehensive molecular characterization of the tumor may reveal genetic alterations that act as tumor drivers and provide targets for personalized therapies. Due to the large number of potential molecular targets, NGS panel diagnostics are a suitable approach in this conjunction with immunohistochemical characterization and the individual clinical situation. Molecular based therapeutical strategies outside of entity-specific approvals should be discussed in an interdisciplinary team within the framework of a molecular tumor board.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona R Rodepeter
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Julia Teply-Szymanski
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Marcel Romey
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Albert Grass
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Ramona Erber
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.,Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Elisabeth K M Mack
- Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas S Tarawneh
- Abteilung für Hämatologie, Onkologie und Immunologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Niklas Gremke
- Abteilung für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Jelena Boekhoff
- Abteilung für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Wündisch
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Uwe Wagner
- Abteilung für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Paul Jank
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Six novel immunoglobulin genes as biomarkers for better prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer by gene co-expression network analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:4484. [PMID: 30872752 PMCID: PMC6418134 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40826-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gene co-expression network analysis (GCNA) can detect alterations in regulatory activities in case/control comparisons. We propose a framework to detect novel genes and networks for predicting breast cancer recurrence. Thirty-four prognosis candidate genes were selected based on a literature review. Four Gene Expression Omnibus Series (GSE) microarray datasets (n = 920) were used to create gene co-expression networks based on these candidates. We applied the framework to four comparison groups according to node (+/−) and recurrence (+/−). We identified a sub-network containing two candidate genes (LST1 and IGHM) and six novel genes (IGHA1, IGHD, IGHG1, IGHG3, IGLC2, and IGLJ3) related to B cell-specific immunoglobulin. These novel genes were correlated with recurrence under the control of node status and were found to function as tumor suppressors; higher mRNA expression indicated a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, HR = 0.87, p = 0.001). We created an immune index score by performing principle component analysis and divided the genes into low and high groups. This discrete index significantly predicted relapse-free survival (RFS) (high: HR = 0.77, p = 0.019; low: control). Public tool KM Plotter and TCGA-BRCA gene expression data were used to validate. We confirmed these genes are correlated with RFS and distal metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and general breast cancer.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma M, Ma Y, Zhang GJ, Liao R, Jiang XF, Yan XX, Bie FJ, Li XB, Lv YH. Eugenol alleviated breast precancerous lesions through HER2/PI3K-AKT pathway-induced cell apoptosis and S-phase arrest. Oncotarget 2017; 8:56296-56310. [PMID: 28915591 PMCID: PMC5593562 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Eugenol can be separated from the oil extract of clove bud, and has many pharmacological functions such as anticancer and transdermal absorption. HER2/PI3K-AKT is a key signaling pathway in the development of breast cancer. In this study, 80 μM eugenol could significantly inhibit the proliferation of HER-2 positive MCF-10AT cells and the inhibition rate was up to 32.8%, but had no obvious inhibitory effect on MCF-7 and MCF-10A cells with HER2 weak expression. Eugenol also significantly induced human breast precancerous lesion MCF-10AT cell apoptosis and cell cycle S-phase arrest, but the biological effects nearly disappeared after HER2 over-expression through transfecting pcDNA3.1-HER2. In MCF-10AT cells treated by 180 μM eugenol, the protein expressions of HER2, AKT, PDK1, p85, Bcl2, NF-κB, Bad and Cyclin D1 were decreased and the decreased rates were respectively 63.0%, 60.0%, 52.9%, 62.9%, 37.1%, 47.2%, 61.7%, 59.1%, while the p21, p27 and Bax expression were increased by 4.48-, 4.76- and 2.57-fold respectively. In the rat models of breast precancerous lesion, 1 mg eugenol for external use significantly inhibited the progress of breast precancerous lesion and the occurrence rate of breast precancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas was decreased by about 30.5%. Furthermore eugenol for external (1 mg) markedly decreased the protein expressions of HER2 (62.9%), AKT (58.6%), PDK1 (56.4%), p85 (54.3%), Bcl2 (59.3%), NF-κB (65.7%), Bad (64.0%), Cyclin D1 (43.0%), while p21, p27 and Bax protein expressions were respectively increased 1.83-, 2.52- and 2.51-fold. The results showed eugenol could significantly inhibit the development of breast precancerous lesions by blocking HER2/PI3K-AKT signaling network. So eugenol may be a promising external drug for breast precancerous lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Ma
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yi Ma
- Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Cellular Biology, Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Medicine of Guangdong Province, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Gui-Juan Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Rui Liao
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xue-Feng Jiang
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xian-Xin Yan
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Feng-Jie Bie
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Xiao-Bo Li
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yan-Hong Lv
- College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Devonshire AS, Sanders R, Whale AS, Nixon GJ, Cowen S, Ellison SL, Parkes H, Pine PS, Salit M, McDaniel J, Munro S, Lund S, Matsukura S, Sekiguchi Y, Kawaharasaki M, Granjeiro JM, Falagan-Lotsch P, Saraiva AM, Couto P, Yang I, Kwon H, Park SR, Demšar T, Žel J, Blejec A, Milavec M, Dong L, Zhang L, Sui Z, Wang J, Viroonudomphol D, Prawettongsopon C, Partis L, Baoutina A, Emslie K, Takatsu A, Akyurek S, Akgoz M, Vonsky M, Konopelko L, Cundapi EM, Urquiza MP, Huggett JF, Foy CA. An international comparability study on quantification of mRNA gene expression ratios: CCQM-P103.1. BIOMOLECULAR DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION 2016; 8:15-28. [PMID: 27335807 PMCID: PMC4906133 DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2016.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Measurement of RNA can be used to study and monitor a range of infectious and non-communicable diseases, with profiling of multiple gene expression mRNA transcripts being increasingly applied to cancer stratification and prognosis. An international comparison study (Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM)-P103.1) was performed in order to evaluate the comparability of measurements of RNA copy number ratio for multiple gene targets between two samples. Six exogenous synthetic targets comprising of External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) standards were measured alongside transcripts for three endogenous gene targets present in the background of human cell line RNA. The study was carried out under the auspices of the Nucleic Acids (formerly Bioanalysis) Working Group of the CCQM. It was coordinated by LGC (United Kingdom) with the support of National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA) and results were submitted from thirteen National Metrology Institutes and Designated Institutes. The majority of laboratories performed RNA measurements using RT-qPCR, with datasets also being submitted by two laboratories based on reverse transcription digital polymerase chain reaction and one laboratory using a next-generation sequencing method. In RT-qPCR analysis, the RNA copy number ratios between the two samples were quantified using either a standard curve or a relative quantification approach. In general, good agreement was observed between the reported results of ERCC RNA copy number ratio measurements. Measurements of the RNA copy number ratios for endogenous genes between the two samples were also consistent between the majority of laboratories. Some differences in the reported values and confidence intervals (‘measurement uncertainties’) were noted which may be attributable to choice of measurement method or quantification approach. This highlights the need for standardised practices for the calculation of fold change ratios and uncertainties in the area of gene expression profiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - P. Scott Pine
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, USA
| | - Marc Salit
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, USA
| | - Jennifer McDaniel
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, USA
| | - Sarah Munro
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, USA
| | - Steve Lund
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, USA
| | - Satoko Matsukura
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuji Sekiguchi
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kawaharasaki
- Biomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Ibaraki, Japan
- National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Ibaraki, Japan
| | - José Mauro Granjeiro
- National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias, Brazil
| | | | - Antonio Marcos Saraiva
- National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias, Brazil
| | - Paulo Couto
- National Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias, Brazil
| | - Inchul Yang
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyerim Kwon
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Ryoul Park
- Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Tina Demšar
- National Institute of Biology (NIB), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jana Žel
- National Institute of Biology (NIB), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrej Blejec
- National Institute of Biology (NIB), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mojca Milavec
- National Institute of Biology (NIB), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lianhua Dong
- National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, PR China
| | - Ling Zhang
- National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, PR China
| | - Zhiwei Sui
- National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, PR China
| | - Jing Wang
- National Institute of Metrology (NIM), Beijing, PR China
| | | | | | - Lina Partis
- National Measurement Institute Australia (NMIA), Lindfield, Australia
| | - Anna Baoutina
- National Measurement Institute Australia (NMIA), Lindfield, Australia
| | - Kerry Emslie
- National Measurement Institute Australia (NMIA), Lindfield, Australia
| | - Akiko Takatsu
- National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Sema Akyurek
- TÜBİTAK Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü (UME), Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Muslum Akgoz
- TÜBİTAK Ulusal Metroloji Enstitüsü (UME), Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Maxim Vonsky
- D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
- Institute of Cytology RAS, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - L.A. Konopelko
- D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (VNIIM), St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ingold Heppner B, Loibl S, Denkert C. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes: A Promising Biomarker in Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2016; 11:96-100. [PMID: 27239170 DOI: 10.1159/000444357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is clear evidence that the immune system plays an essential role in tumor defense. By determining tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), the individual immunological response becomes more apparent and measurable. In breast cancer, high levels of TILs are associated with a more favorable clinical course. In this review, we describe how TILs are determined with emphasis on daily routine diagnostics. We further discuss their impact as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy setting as well as in residual disease. We also discuss their potential future implications on further stratifying prognostic subgroups of breast cancer, thereby possibly influencing future therapy considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG) c/o Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|