Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging

Intraindividual Comparison of Image Quality Between Low-Dose and Ultra-Low-Dose Abdominal CT With Deep Learning Reconstruction and Standard-Dose Abdominal CT Using Dual-Split Scan

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to intraindividually compare the conspicuity of focal liver lesions (FLLs) between low- and ultra-low-dose computed tomography (CT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and standard-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) from a single CT using dual-split scan in patients with suspected liver metastasis via a noninferiority design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled participants who met the eligibility criteria at 2 tertiary hospitals in South Korea from June 2022 to January 2023. The criteria included (a) being aged between 20 and 85 years and (b) having suspected or known liver metastases. Dual-source CT scans were conducted, with the standard radiation dose divided in a 2:1 ratio between tubes A and B (67% and 33%, respectively). The voltage settings of 100/120 kVp were selected based on the participant's body mass index (<30 vs ≥30 kg/m2). For image reconstruction, MBIR was utilized for standard-dose (100%) images, whereas DLR was employed for both low-dose (67%) and ultra-low-dose (33%) images. Three radiologists independently evaluated FLL conspicuity, the probability of metastasis, and subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert scale, in addition to quantitative signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios. The noninferiority margins were set at -0.5 for conspicuity and -0.1 for detection.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three participants (male = 58, mean body mass index = 23.0 ± 3.4 kg/m2) were included in the analysis. The low- and ultra-low- dose had a lower radiation dose than the standard-dose (median CT dose index volume: 3.75, 1.87 vs 5.62 mGy, respectively, in the arterial phase; 3.89, 1.95 vs 5.84 in the portal venous phase, P < 0.001 for all). Median FLL conspicuity was lower in the low- and ultra-low-dose scans compared with the standard-dose (3.0 [interquartile range, IQR: 2.0, 4.0], 3.0 [IQR: 1.0, 4.0] vs 3.0 [IQR: 2.0, 4.0] in the arterial phase; 4.0 [IQR: 1.0, 5.0], 3.0 [IQR: 1.0, 4.0] vs 4.0 [IQR: 2.0, 5.0] in the portal venous phases), yet within the noninferiority margin (P < 0.001 for all). FLL detection was also lower but remained within the margin (lesion detection rate: 0.772 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.727, 0.812], 0.754 [0.708, 0.795], respectively) compared with the standard-dose (0.810 [95% CI: 0.770, 0.844]). Sensitivity for liver metastasis differed between the standard- (80.6% [95% CI: 76.0, 84.5]), low-, and ultra-low-doses (75.7% [95% CI: 70.2, 80.5], 73.7 [95% CI: 68.3, 78.5], respectively, P < 0.001 for both), whereas specificity was similar (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low- and ultra-low-dose CT with DLR showed noninferior FLL conspicuity and detection compared with standard-dose CT with MBIR. Caution is needed due to a potential decrease in sensitivity for metastasis (clinicaltrials.gov/ NCT05324046).

Exploring the Low-Dose Limit for Focal Hepatic Lesion Detection with a Deep Learning-Based CT Reconstruction Algorithm: A Simulation Study on Patient Images

This study aims to investigate the maximum achievable dose reduction for applying a new deep learning-based reconstruction algorithm, namely the artificial intelligence iterative reconstruction (AIIR), in computed tomography (CT) for hepatic lesion detection. A total of 40 patients with 98 clinically confirmed hepatic lesions were retrospectively included. The mean volume CT dose index was 13.66 ± 1.73 mGy in routine-dose portal venous CT examinations, where the images were originally obtained with hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Low-dose simulations were performed in projection domain for 40%-, 20%-, and 10%-dose levels, followed by reconstruction using both HIR and AIIR. Two radiologists were asked to detect hepatic lesion on each set of low-dose image in separate sessions. Qualitative metrics including lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and overall image quality were evaluated using a 5-point scale. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for lesion was also calculated for quantitative assessment. The lesion CNR on AIIR at reduced doses were significantly higher than that on routine-dose HIR (all p < 0.05). Lower qualitative image quality was observed as the radiation dose reduced, while there were no significant differences between 40%-dose AIIR and routine-dose HIR images. The lesion detection rate was 100%, 98% (96/98), and 73.5% (72/98) on 40%-, 20%-, and 10%-dose AIIR, respectively, whereas it was 98% (96/98), 73.5% (72/98), and 40% (39/98) on the corresponding low-dose HIR, respectively. AIIR outperformed HIR in simulated low-dose CT examinations of the liver. The use of AIIR allows up to 60% dose reduction for lesion detection while maintaining comparable image quality to routine-dose HIR.

Low-dose liver CT: image quality and diagnostic accuracy of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm

OBJECTIVES

To perform a comprehensive within-subject image quality analysis of abdominal CT examinations reconstructed with DLIR and to evaluate diagnostic accuracy compared to the routinely applied adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) algorithm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oncologic patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced CT. Images were reconstructed with DLIR with three intensity levels of reconstruction (high, medium, and low) and ASiR-V at strength levels from 10 to 100% with a 10% interval. Three radiologists characterized the lesions and two readers assessed diagnostic accuracy and calculated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM), and subjective image quality, the latter with a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age: 70 ± 10 years, 23 men) were enrolled and 130 liver lesions (105 benign lesions, 25 metastases) were identified. DLIR_H achieved the highest SNR and CNR, comparable to ASiR-V 100% (p ≥ .051). DLIR_M returned the highest subjective image quality (score: 5; IQR: 4-5; p ≤ .001) and significant median increase (29%) in FOM (p < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm: 32/33 lesions were detected with DLIR_M and 26 lesions were detected with ASiR-V 50% (p = .031). Lesion accuracy of was 93.8% (95% CI: 88.1, 97.3; 122 of 130 lesions) for DLIR and 87.7% (95% CI: 80.8, 92.8; 114 of 130 lesions) for ASiR-V 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR yields superior image quality and provides higher diagnostic accuracy compared to ASiR-V in the assessment of hypovascular liver lesions, in particular for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm demonstrates higher diagnostic accuracy compared to iterative reconstruction in the identification of hypovascular liver lesions, especially for lesions ≤ 0.5 cm.

KEY POINTS

• Iterative reconstruction algorithm impacts image texture, with negative effects on diagnostic capabilities. • Medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction algorithm outperforms iterative reconstruction in the diagnostic accuracy of ≤ 0.5 cm hypovascular liver lesions (93.9% vs 78.8%), also granting higher objective and subjective image quality. • Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm can be safely implemented in routine abdominal CT protocols in place of iterative reconstruction.

Towards safer imaging: A comparative study of deep learning-based denoising and iterative reconstruction in intraindividual low-dose CT scans using an in-vivo large animal model

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT) scans are a significant source of medically induced radiation exposure. Novel deep learning-based denoising (DLD) algorithms have been shown to enable diagnostic image quality at lower radiation doses than iterative reconstruction (IR) methods. However, most comparative studies employ low-dose simulations due to ethical constraints. We used real intraindividual animal scans to investigate the dose-reduction capabilities of a DLD algorithm in comparison to IR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen veterinarian-sedated alive pigs underwent 2 CT scans on the same 3rd generation dual-source scanner with two months between each scan. Four additional scans ensued each time, with mAs reduced to 50 %, 25 %, 10 %, and 5 %. All scans were reconstructed ADMIRE levels 2 (IR2) and a novel DLD algorithm, resulting in 280 datasets. Objective image quality (CT numbers stability, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio) was measured via consistent regions of interest. Three radiologists independently rated all possible dataset combinations per time point for subjective image quality (-1 = inferior, 0 = equal, 1 = superior). The points were averaged for a semiquantitative score, and inter-rater agreement was measured using Spearman's correlation coefficient and adequately corrected mixed-effects modeling analyzed objective and subjective image quality.

RESULTS

Neither dose-reduction nor reconstruction method negatively impacted CT number stability (p > 0.999). In objective image quality assessment, the lowest radiation dose achievable by DLD when comparing noise (p = 0.544) and CNR (p = 0.115) to 100 % IR2 was 25 %. Overall, inter-rater agreement of the subjective image quality ratings was strong (r ≥ 0.69, mean 0.93 ± 0.05, 95 % CI 0.92-0.94; each p < 0.001), and subjective assessments corroborated that DLD at 25 % radiation dose was comparable to 100 % IR2 in image quality, sharpness, and contrast (p ≥ 0.281).

CONCLUSIONS

The DLD algorithm can achieve image quality comparable to the standard IR method but with a significant dose reduction of up to 75%. This suggests a promising avenue for lowering patient radiation exposure without sacrificing diagnostic quality.

Deep learning imaging reconstruction of reduced-dose 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging for early detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether reduced-dose (RD) gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) of 40 keV virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) enhanced the early detection and diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

Thirty-five participants with pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled from March to August 2022 after routine care abdominal computed tomography (CT). GSI mode was used for contrast-enhanced CT, and two portal venous phase CT images were obtained [standard-dose (SD) CT dose index (CTDIvol) = 15.51 mGy, RD CTDIvol = 7.95 mGy]. The 40 keV-VMI were reconstructed via filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 60 %, AV60) of both SD and RD images. RD medium-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-M) and RD high-strength deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR-H) were used to reconstruct the 40 keV-VMI. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver and the lesions were objectively evaluated. The overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence were subjectively evaluated, to compare the differences in evaluation results among the different images.

RESULTS

All 35 participants (mean age: 59.51 ± 11.01 years; 14 females) underwent SD and RD GSI portal venous-phase CT scans. The dose-length product of the RD GSI scan was reduced by 49-53 % lower than that of the SD GSI scan (420.22 ± 31.95) vs (817.58 ± 60.56). A total of 219 lesions were identified, including 55 benign lesions and 164 metastases, with an average size of 7.37 ± 4.14 mm. SD-FBP detected 207 lesions, SD-AV60 detected 201 lesions, and DLIR-M and DLIR-H detected 199 and 190 lesions, respectively. For lesions ≤ 5 mm, there was no statistical difference between SD-FBP vs DLIR-M (χ2McNemar = 1.00, P = 0.32) and SD-AV60 vs DLIR-M (χ2McNemar = 0.33, P = 0.56) in the detection rate. The CNR, SNR, and noise of DLIR-M and DLIR-H 40 keV-VMI images were better than those of SD-FBP images (P < 0.01) but did not differ significantly from those of SD-AV60 images (P > 0.05). When the lesions ≤ 5 mm, there were statistical differences in the overall diagnostic sensitivity of lesions compared with SD-FBP, SD-AV60, DLIR-M and DLIR-H (P＜0.01). There were no statistical differences in the sensitivity of lesions diagnosis between SD-FBP, SD-AV60 and DLIR-M (both P＞0.05). However, the DLIR-M subjective image quality and lesion diagnostic confidence were higher for SD-FBP (both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Reduced dose DLIR-M of 40 keV-VMI can be used for routine follow-up care of colorectal cancer patients, to optimize evaluations and ensure CT image quality. Meanwhile, the detection rate and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of small lesions, early liver metastases is not obviously reduced.

Accuracy of liver metastasis detection and characterization: Dual-energy CT versus single-energy CT with deep learning reconstruction

PURPOSE

To assess whether image quality differences between SECT (single-energy CT) and DECT (dual-energy CT 70 keV) with equivalent radiation doses result in altered detection and characterization accuracy of liver metastases when using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR), and whether DECT spectral curve usage improves accuracy of indeterminate lesion characterization.

METHODS

In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (March through August 2022), adult men and non-pregnant adult women with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases underwent SECT (120 kVp) and a DECT (70 keV) portovenous abdominal CT scan using DLIR in the same breath-hold (Revolution CT ES; GE Healthcare). Participants were excluded if consent could not be obtained, if there were nonequivalent radiation doses between the two scans, or if the examination was cancelled/rescheduled. Three radiologists independently performed lesion detection and characterization during two separate sessions (SECT DLIRmedium and DECT DLIRhigh) as well as reported lesion confidence and overall image quality. Hounsfield units were measured. Spectral HU curves were provided for any lesions rated as indeterminate. McNemar's test was used to test the marginal homogeneity in terms of diagnostic sensitivity, accuracy and lesion detection. A generalized estimating equation method was used for categorical outcomes.

RESULTS

30 participants (mean age, 58 years ± 11, 21 men) were evaluated. Mean CTDIvol was 34 mGy for both scans. 141 lesions (124 metastases, 17 benign) with a mean size of 0.8 cm ± 0.3 cm were identified. High scores for image quality (scores of 4 or 5) were not significantly different between DECT (N = 71 out of 90 total scores from the three readers) and SECT (N = 62) (OR, 2.01; 95% CI:0.89, 4.57; P = 0.093). Equivalent image noise to SECT DLIRmed (HU SD 10 ± 2) was obtained with DECT DLIRhigh (HU SD 10 ± 3) (P = 1). There was no significant difference in lesion detection between DECT and SECT (140/141 lesions) (99.3%; 95% CI:96.1%, 100%).The mean lesion confidence scores by each reader were 4.2 ± 1.3, 3.9 ± 1.0, and 4.8 ± 0.8 for SECT and 4.1 ± 1.4, 4.0 ± 1.0, and 4.7 ± 0.8 for DECT (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.11; P = 0.21). Small lesion (≤5mm) characterization accuracy on SECT and DECT was 89.1% (95% CI:76.4%, 96.4%; 41/46) and 84.8% (71.1%, 93.7%; 39/46), respectively (P = 0.41). Use of spectral HU lesion curves resulted in 34 correct changes in characterizations and no mischaracterizations.

CONCLUSION

DECT required a higher strength of DLIR to obtain equivalent noise compared to SECT DLIR. At equivalent radiation doses and image noise, there was no significant difference in subjective image quality or observer lesion performance between DECT (70 keV) and SECT. However, DECT spectral HU curves of indeterminate lesions improved characterization.

How Real Are Computed Tomography Low Dose Simulations? An Investigational In-Vivo Large Animal Study

OBJECTIVES

CT low-dose simulation methods have gained significant traction in protocol development, as they lack the risk of increased patient exposure. However, in-vivo validations of low-dose simulations are as uncommon as prospective low-dose image acquisition itself. Therefore, we investigated the extent to which simulated low-dose CT datasets resemble their real-dose counterparts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen veterinarian-sedated alive pigs underwent three CT scans on the same third generation dual-source scanner with 2 months between each scan. At each time, three additional scans ensued, with mAs reduced to 50%, 25%, and 10%. All scans were reconstructed using wFBP and ADMIRE levels 1-5. Matching low-dose datasets were generated from the 100% scans using reconstruction-based and DICOM-based simulations. Objective image quality (CT numbers stability, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio) was measured via consistent regions of interest. Three radiologists independently rated all possible dataset combinations per time point for subjective image quality (-1=inferior, 0=equal, 1=superior). The points were averaged for a semiquantitative score, and inter-rater-agreement was measured using Spearman's correlation coefficient. A structural similarity index (SSIM) analyzed the voxel-wise similarity of the volumes. Adequately corrected mixed-effects analysis compared objective and subjective image quality. Multiple linear regression with three-way interactions measured the contribution of dose, reconstruction mode, simulation method, and rater to subjective image quality.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between objective and subjective image quality of reconstruction-based and DICOM-based simulation on all dose levels (p≥0.137). However, both simulation methods produced significantly lower objective image quality than real-dose images below 25% mAs due to noise overestimation (p<0.001; SSIM≤89±3). Overall, inter-rater-agreement was strong (r≥0.68, mean 0.93±0.05, 95% CI 0.92-0.94; each p<0.001). In regression analysis, significant decreases in subjective image quality were observed for lower radiation doses (b ≤ -0.387, 95%CI -0.399 to -0.358; p<0.001) but not for reconstruction modes, simulation methods, raters, or three-way interactions (p≥0.103).

CONCLUSION

Simulated low-dose CT datasets are subjectively and objectively indistinguishable from their real-dose counterparts down to 25% mAs, making them an invaluable tool for efficient low-dose protocol development.

How Do Cancer-Specific Computed Tomography Protocols Compare With the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry? An Analysis of Computed Tomography Dose at 2 Cancer Centers

BACKGROUND

Little guidance exists on how to stratify radiation dose according to diagnostic task. Changing dose for different cancer types is currently not informed by the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry dose survey.

METHODS

A total of 9602 patient examinations were pulled from 2 National Cancer Institute designated cancer centers. Computed tomography dose (CTDI vol ) was extracted, and patient water equivalent diameter was calculated. N-way analysis of variance was used to compare the dose levels between 2 protocols used at site 1, and three protocols used at site 2.

RESULTS

Sites 1 and 2 both independently stratified their doses according to cancer indications in similar ways. For example, both sites used lower doses ( P < 0.001) for follow-up of testicular cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma. Median dose at median patient size from lowest to highest dose level for site 1 were 17.9 (17.7-18.0) mGy (mean [95% confidence interval]) and 26.8 (26.2-27.4) mGy. For site 2, they were 12.1 (10.6-13.7) mGy, 25.5 (25.2-25.7) mGy, and 34.2 (33.8-34.5) mGy. Both sites had higher doses ( P < 0.001) between their routine and high-image-quality protocols, with an increase of 48% between these doses for site 1 and 25% for site 2. High-image-quality protocols were largely applied for detection of low-contrast liver lesions or subtle pelvic pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that 2 cancer centers independently choose to stratify their cancer doses in similar ways. Sites 1 and 2 dose data were higher than the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry dose survey data. We thus propose including a cancer-specific subset for the dose registry.

A Review of Deep Learning CT Reconstruction: Concepts, Limitations, and Promise in Clinical Practice

Purpose of Review

Deep Learning reconstruction (DLR) is the current state-of-the-art method for CT image formation. Comparisons to existing filter back-projection, iterative, and model-based reconstructions are now available in the literature. This review summarizes the prior reconstruction methods, introduces DLR, and then reviews recent findings from DLR from a physics and clinical perspective.

Recent Findings

DLR has been shown to allow for noise magnitude reductions relative to filtered back-projection without suffering from “plastic” or “blotchy” noise texture that was found objectionable with most iterative and model-based solutions. Clinically, early reader studies have reported increases in subjective quality scores and studies have successfully implemented DLR-enabled dose reductions.

Summary

The future of CT image reconstruction is bright; deep learning methods have only started to tackle problems in this space via addressing noise reduction. Artifact mitigation and spectral applications likely be future candidates for DLR applications.

A minimum SNR criterion for computed tomography object detection in the projection domain

BACKGROUND

A common rule of thumb for object detection is the Rose criterion, which states that a signal must be five standard deviations above background to be detectable to a human observer. The validity of the Rose criterion in CT imaging is limited due to the presence of correlated noise. Recent reconstruction and denoising methodologies are also able to restore apparent image quality in very noisy conditions, and the ultimate limits of these methodologies are not yet known.

PURPOSE

To establish a lower bound on the minimum achievable signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for object detection, below which detection performance is poor regardless of reconstruction or denoising methodology.

METHODS

We consider a numerical observer that operates on projection data and has perfect knowledge of the background and the objects to be detected, and determine the minimum projection SNR that is necessary to achieve predetermined lesion-level sensitivity and case-level specificity targets. We define a set of discrete signal objects that encompasses any lesion of interest and could include lesions of different sizes, shapes, and locations. The task is to determine which object of is present, or to state the null hypothesis that no object is present. We constrain each object in to have equivalent projection SNR and use Monte Carlo methods to calculate the required projection SNR necessary. Because our calculations are performed in projection space, they impose an upper limit on the performance possible from reconstructed images. We chose to be a collection of elliptical or circular low contrast metastases and simulated detection of these objects in a parallel beam system with Gaussian statistics. Unless otherwise stated, we assume a target of 80% lesion-level sensitivity and 80% case-level specificity and a search field of view that is 6 cm by 6 cm by 10 slices.

RESULTS

When contains only a single object, our problem is equivalent to two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) and the required projection SNR is 1.7. When consists of circular 6 mm lesions at different locations in space, the required projection SNR is 5.1. When is extended to include ellipses and circles of different sizes, the required projection SNR increases to 5.3. The required SNR increases if the sensitivity target, specificity target, or search field of view increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Even with perfect knowledge of the background and target objects, the ideal observer still requires an SNR of approximately 5. This is a lower bound on the SNR that would be required in real conditions, where the background and target objects are not known perfectly. Algorithms that denoise lesions with less than 5 projection SNR, regardless of the denoising methodology, are expected to show vanishing effects or false positive lesions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases

Background Assessment of liver lesions is constrained as CT radiation doses are lowered; evidence suggests deep learning reconstructions mitigate such effects. Purpose To evaluate liver metastases and image quality between reduced-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Materials and Methods In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (September 2019 through April 2021), participants with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases at baseline CT underwent standard-dose and reduced-dose portal venous abdominal CT in the same breath hold. Three radiologists detected and characterized lesions at standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR, reported confidence, and scored image quality. Contrast-to-noise ratios for liver metastases were recorded. Summary statistics were reported, and a generalized linear mixed model was used. Results Fifty-one participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 13; 31 men) were evaluated. The mean volume CT dose index was 65.1% lower with reduced-dose CT (12.2 mGy) than with standard-dose CT (34.9 mGy). A total of 161 lesions (127 metastases, 34 benign lesions) with a mean size of 0.7 cm ± 0.3 were identified. Subjective image quality of reduced-dose DLIR was superior to that of standard-dose FBP (P < .001). The mean contrast-to-noise ratio for liver metastases of reduced-dose DLIR (3.9 ± 1.7) was higher than that of standard-dose FBP (3.5 ± 1.4) (P < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions 0.5 cm or smaller: 63 of 65 lesions detected with standard-dose FBP (96.9%; 95% CI: 89.3, 99.6) and 47 lesions with reduced-dose DLIR (72.3%; 95% CI: 59.8, 82.7). Lesion accuracy with standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR was 80.1% (95% CI: 73.1, 86.0; 129 of 161 lesions) and 67.1% (95% CI: 59.3, 74.3; 108 of 161 lesions), respectively (P = .01). Lower lesion confidence was reported with a reduced dose (P < .001). Conclusion Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improved CT image quality at 65% radiation dose reduction while preserving detection of liver lesions larger than 0.5 cm. Reduced-dose DLIR demonstrated overall inferior characterization of liver lesions and reader confidence. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03151564 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Unenhanced abdominal low-dose CT reconstructed with deep learning-based image reconstruction: image quality and anatomical structure depiction

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in unenhanced abdominal low-dose CT (LDCT).

Materials and methods

Two patient groups were included in this prospective study: 58 consecutive patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal standard-dose CT reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (SDCT group) and 48 consecutive patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal LDCT reconstructed with high strength level of DLIR (LDCT group). The background noise and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney, abdominal aorta, inferior vena cava, and portal vein were calculated. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed the overall image noise, overall image quality, and abdominal anatomical structures depiction. Quantitative and qualitative parameters and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) were compared between SDCT and LDCT groups.

Results

The background noise was lower in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P = 0.02). SNRs were higher in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P < 0.001–0.004) except for the liver. Overall image noise was superior in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P < 0.001). Overall image quality was not different between SDCT and LDCT groups (P = 0.25–0.26). Depiction of almost all abdominal anatomical structures was equal to or better in LDCT group than in SDCT group (P < 0.001–0.88). The SSDE was lower in LDCT group (4.0 mGy) than in SDCT group (20.6 mGy) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

DLIR facilitates substantial radiation dose reduction of > 75% and significantly reduces background noise. DLIR can maintain image quality and anatomical structure depiction in unenhanced abdominal LDCT.

Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of reduced-dose computed tomography enterography with model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric Crohn's disease patients

This study assessed the image quality and diagnostic accuracy in determining disease activity of the terminal ileum of the reduced-dose computed tomography enterography using model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Eighteen patients were prospectively enrolled and allocated to the standard-dose (SD) and reduced-dose (RD) computed tomography enterography (CTE) groups (n = 9 per group). Image quality, reader confidence in interpreting bowel findings, accuracy in determining active CD in the terminal ileum, and radiation dose were evaluated. Objective image quality did not show intergroup differences, except for image sharpness. Although reader confidence in detecting mural stratification, ulcer, and perienteric fat stranding of the RD-CTE were inferior to SD-CTE, RD-CTE correctly diagnosed active disease in all patients. The mean values of radiation dose metrics (SD-CTE vs. RD-CTE) were 4.3 versus 0.74 mGy, 6.1 versus 1.1 mGy, 211.9 versus 34.5 mGy∙cm, and 4.4 versus 0.7 mSv mGy∙cm for CTDI_vol, size-specific dose estimation, dose-length product, and effective dose, respectively. RD-CTE showed comparable diagnostic accuracy to SD-CTE in determining active disease of the terminal ileum in pediatric CD patients. However, image quality and reader confidence in detecting ulcer and perienteric fat stranding was compromised.

Effects of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V Technology on the Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Unenhanced and Enhanced CT Scans of the Piglet Abdomen

To investigate the optimal pre- and post-adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) levels in pediatric abdominal computed tomography (CT) to minimize radiation exposure and maintain image quality using an animal model. A total of 10 standard piglets were selected and scanned to obtain unenhanced and enhanced images under different pre-ASiR-V conditions. The corresponding images were obtained using ASiR-V algorithm at different post-ASiR-V levels. CT value, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast noise ratio (CNR) of abdominal tissues, subjective image score, and radiation dose of unenhanced and enhanced scans were analyzed. With the increase of pre-ASiR-V level, the radiation dose in piglets gradually decreased (P < 0.05). Within the same group of pre-ASiR-V, the image noise was decreased (P < 0.05) by increasing post-ASiR-V level. There was no statistical difference between SNR and CNR values. In unenhanced CT, the subjective score of the images with the combination of 40% pre- and 60% post-ASiR-V levels had no statistical difference compared to the combination of 0% pre- and 60% post-ASiR-V levels, while the radiation dose decreased by 31.6%. In the enhanced CT, the subjective image score with the 60% pre- and 60% post-ASiR-V combination had no statistical difference compared to the 0% pre- and 60% post-ASiR-V combination, while the radiation dose was reduced by 48.9%. The combined use of pre- and post-ASiR-V maintains image quality at the reduced radiation dose. The optimal level for unenhanced CT is 40% pre-combined with 60% post-ASiR-V, while that for enhanced CT is 60% pre-combined with 60% post-ASiR-V in pediatric abdominal CT.

Evaluation of Apparent Noise on CT Images Using Moving Average Filters

This study aims to devise a simple method for evaluating the magnitude of texture noise (apparent noise) observed on computed tomography (CT) images scanned at a low radiation dose and reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms, and to evaluate the apparent noise in CT images reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), IR, and two types of DLR (AiCE Body and AiCE Body Sharp) algorithms. We set a square region of interest (ROI) on CT images of standard- and obese-sized low-contrast phantoms, slid different-sized moving average filters in the ROI vertically and horizontally in steps of 1 pixel, and calculated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean CT values for each filter size. The SD of the mean CT values was fitted with a curve inversely proportional to the filter size, and an apparent noise index was determined from the curve-fitting formula. The apparent noise index of AiCE Body Sharp images for a given mAs value was approximately 58, 23, and 18% lower than that of the FBP, AIDR 3D, and AiCE Body images, respectively. The apparent noise index was considered to reflect noise power spectrum values at lower spatial frequency. Moreover, the apparent noise index was inversely proportional to the square roots of the mAs values. Thus, the apparent noise index could be a useful indicator to quantify and compare texture noise on CT images obtained with different scan parameters and reconstruction algorithms.

Reconstruction of three-dimensional tomographic patient models for radiation dose modulation in CT from two scout views using deep learning

BACKGROUND

A tomographic patient model is essential for radiation dose modulation in x-ray computed tomography (CT). Currently, two-view scout images (also known as topograms) are used to estimate patient models with relatively uniform attenuation coefficients. These patient models do not account for the detailed anatomical variations of human subjects, and thus, may limit the accuracy of intraview or organ-specific dose modulations in emerging CT technologies.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to show that 3D tomographic patient models can be generated from two-view scout images using deep learning strategies, and the reconstructed 3D patient models indeed enable accurate prescriptions of fluence-field modulated or organ-specific dose delivery in the subsequent CT scans.

METHODS

CT images and the corresponding two-view scout images were retrospectively collected from 4214 individual CT exams. The collected data were curated for the training of a deep neural network architecture termed ScoutCT-NET to generate 3D tomographic attenuation models from two-view scout images. The trained network was validated using a cohort of 55 136 images from 212 individual patients. To evaluate the accuracy of the reconstructed 3D patient models, radiation delivery plans were generated using ScoutCT-NET 3D patient models and compared with plans prescribed based on true CT images (gold standard) for both fluence-field-modulated CT and organ-specific CT. Radiation dose distributions were estimated using Monte Carlo simulations and were quantitatively evaluated using the Gamma analysis method. Modulated dose profiles were compared against state-of-the-art tube current modulation schemes. Impacts of ScoutCT-NET patient model-based dose modulation schemes on universal-purpose CT acquisitions and organ-specific acquisitions were also compared in terms of overall image appearance, noise magnitude, and noise uniformity.

RESULTS

The results demonstrate that (1) The end-to-end trained ScoutCT-NET can be used to generate 3D patient attenuation models and demonstrate empirical generalizability. (2) The 3D patient models can be used to accurately estimate the spatial distribution of radiation dose delivered by standard helical CTs prior to the actual CT acquisition; compared to the gold-standard dose distribution, 95.0% of the voxels in the ScoutCT-NET based dose maps have acceptable gamma values for 5 mm distance-to-agreement and 10% dose difference. (3) The 3D patient models also enabled accurate prescription of fluence-field modulated CT to generate a more uniform noise distribution across the patient body compared to tube current-modulated CT. (4) ScoutCT-NET 3D patient models enabled accurate prescription of organ-specific CT to boost image quality for a given body region-of-interest under a given radiation dose constraint.

CONCLUSION

3D tomographic attenuation models generated by ScoutCT-NET from two-view scout images can be used to prescribe fluence-field-modulated or organ-specific CT scans with high accuracy for the overall objective of radiation dose reduction or image quality improvement for a given imaging task.

Image quality in liver CT: low-dose deep learning vs standard-dose model-based iterative reconstructions

OBJECTIVES

To compare the overall image quality and detectability of significant (malignant and pre-malignant) liver lesions of low-dose liver CT (LDCT, 33.3% dose) using deep learning denoising (DLD) to standard-dose CT (SDCT, 100% dose) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, CT images of 80 patients with hepatic focal lesions were included. For noninferiority analysis of overall image quality, a margin of - 0.5 points (scored in a 5-point scale) for the difference between scan protocols was pre-defined. Other quantitative or qualitative image quality assessments were performed. Additionally, detectability of significant liver lesions was compared, with 64 pairs of CT, using the jackknife alternative free-response ROC analysis, with noninferior margin defined by the lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference of figure-of-merit less than - 0.1.

RESULTS

The mean overall image quality scores with LDCT and SDCT were 3.77 ± 0.38 and 3.94 ± 0.34, respectively, demonstrating a difference of - 0.17 (95% CI: - 0.21 to - 0.12), which did not cross the predefined noninferiority margin of - 0.5. Furthermore, LDCT showed significantly superior quantitative results of liver lesion contrast to noise ratio (p < 0.05). However, although LDCT scored higher than the average score in qualitative image quality assessments, they were significantly lower than those of SDCT (p < 0.05). Figure-of-merit for lesion detection was 0.859 for LDCT and 0.878 for SDCT, showing noninferiority (difference: - 0.019, 95% CI: - 0.058 to 0.021).

CONCLUSION

LDCT using DLD with 67% radiation dose reduction showed non-inferior overall image quality and lesion detectability, compared to SDCT.

KEY POINTS

• Low-dose liver CT using deep learning denoising (DLD), at 67% dose reduction, provided non-inferior overall image quality compared to standard-dose CT using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). • Low-dose CT using DLD showed significantly less noise and higher CNR _{lesion to liver} than standard-dose CT using MBIR and demonstrated at least average image quality score among all readers, albeit with lower scores than standard-dose CT using MBIR. • Low-dose liver CT showed noninferior detectability for malignant and pre-malignant liver lesions, compared to standard-dose CT.

CT Noise-Reduction Methods for Lower-Dose Scanning: Strengths and Weaknesses of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms and New Techniques

Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms are the most widely used CT noise-reduction method to improve image quality and have greatly facilitated radiation dose reduction within the radiology community. Various IR methods have different strengths and limitations. Because IR algorithms are typically nonlinear, they can modify spatial resolution and image noise texture in different regions of the CT image; hence traditional image-quality metrics are not appropriate to assess the ability of IR to preserve diagnostic accuracy, especially for low-contrast diagnostic tasks. In this review, the authors highlight emerging IR algorithms and CT noise-reduction techniques and summarize how these techniques can be evaluated to help determine the appropriate radiation dose levels for different diagnostic tasks in CT. In addition to advanced IR techniques, we describe novel CT noise-reduction methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN-based noise-reduction techniques may offer the ability to reduce image noise while maintaining high levels of image detail but may have unique drawbacks. Other novel CT noise-reduction methods are being developed to leverage spatial and/or spectral redundancy in multiphase or multienergy CT. Radiologists and medical physicists should be familiar with these different alternatives to adapt available CT technology for different diagnostic tasks. The scope of this article is (a) to review the clinical applications of IR algorithms as well as their strengths, weaknesses, and methods of assessment and (b) to explore new CT image reconstruction and noise-reduction techniques that promise to facilitate radiation dose reduction. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Protocol Optimization Considerations for Implementing Deep Learning CT Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE. Previous advances over filtered back projection (FBP) have incorporated model-based iterative reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to characterize the latest advance in image reconstruction, that is, deep learning. The focus was on applying characterization results of a deep learning approach to decisions about clinical CT protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A proprietary deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) method was characterized against an existing advanced adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction method (ASIR-V) and FBP from the same vendor. The metrics used were contrast-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution as a function of contrast level, noise texture (i.e., noise power spectra [NPS]), noise scaling as a function of slice thickness, and CT number consistency. The American College of Radiology accreditation phantom and a uniform water phantom were used at a range of doses and slice thicknesses for both axial and helical acquisition modes. RESULTS. ASIR-V and DLIR were associated with improved contrast-to-noise ratio over FBP for all doses and slice thicknesses. No dose or contrast dependencies of spatial resolution were observed for ASIR-V or DLIR. NPS results showed DLIR maintained an FBP-like noise texture whereas ASIR-V shifted the NPS to lower frequencies. Noise changed with dose and slice thickness in the same manner for ASIR-V and FBP. DLIR slice thickness noise scaling differed from FBP, exhibiting less noise penalty with decreasing slice thickness. No clinically significant changes were observed in CT numbers for any measurement condition. CONCLUSION. In a phantom model, DLIR does not suffer from the concerns over reduction in spatial resolution and introduction of poor noise texture associated with previous methods.

Deep learning image reconstruction for improvement of image quality of abdominal computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) to enhance the image quality of abdominal CT, compared to iterative reconstruction technique.

METHOD

Pre and post-contrast abdominal CT images in 50 patients were reconstructed with 2 different algorithms: hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid IR: ASiR-V 50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity). Standard deviation of attenuation in normal liver parenchyma was measured as the image noise on pre and post-contrast CT. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for the aorta, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver were calculated on post-contrast CT. The overall image quality was graded on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent).

RESULTS

The image noise was significantly decreased by DLIR compared to hybrid-IR [hybrid IR, median 8.3 Hounsfield unit (HU) (interquartile range (IQR) 7.6-9.2 HU); DLIR, median 5.2 HU (IQR 4.6-5.8), P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT]. The CNR and SNR were significantly improved by DLIR [CNR, median 4.5 (IQR 3.8-5.6) vs 7.3 (IQR 6.2-8.8), P < 0.0001; SNR, median 9.4 (IQR 8.3-10.1) vs 15.0 (IQR 13.2-16.4), P < 0.0001]. The overall image quality score was also higher for DLIR compared to hybrid-IR (hybrid IR 3.1 ± 0.6 vs DLIR 4.6 ± 0.5, P < 0.0001 for post-contrast CT).

CONCLUSIONS

Image noise, overall image quality, CNR and SNR for abdominal CT images are improved with DLIR compared to hybrid IR.

Simulated Radiation Dose Reduction in Whole-Body CT on a 3rd Generation Dual-Source Scanner: An Intraindividual Comparison

To evaluate the effect of radiation dose reduction on image quality and diagnostic confidence in contrast-enhanced whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) staging. We randomly selected March 2016 for retrospective inclusion of 18 consecutive patients (14 female, 60 ± 15 years) with clinically indicated WBCT staging on the same 3rd generation dual-source CT. Using low-dose simulations, we created data sets with 100, 80, 60, 40, and 20% of the original radiation dose. Each set was reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE^®, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) strength 1–5, resulting in 540 datasets total. ADMIRE 2 was the reference standard for intraindividual comparison. The effective radiation dose was calculated using commercially available software. For comparison of objective image quality, noise assessments of subcutaneous adipose tissue regions were performed automatically using the software. Three radiologists blinded to the study evaluated image quality and diagnostic confidence independently on an equidistant 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 5 = excellent). At 100%, the effective radiation dose in our population was 13.3 ± 9.1 mSv. At 20% radiation dose, it was possible to obtain comparably low noise levels when using ADMIRE 5 (p = 1.000, r = 0.29). We identified ADMIRE 3 at 40% radiation dose (5.3 ± 3.6 mSv) as the lowest achievable radiation dose with image quality and diagnostic confidence equal to our reference standard (p = 1.000, r > 0.4). The inter-rater agreement for this result was almost perfect (ICC ≥ 0.958, 95% CI 0.909–0.983). On a 3rd generation scanner, it is feasible to maintain good subjective image quality, diagnostic confidence, and image noise in single-energy WBCT staging at dose levels as low as 40% of the original dose (5.3 ± 3.6 mSv), when using ADMIRE 3.

A feasibility study of realizing low-dose abdominal CT using deep learning image reconstruction algorithm

OBJECTIVES

To explore the feasibility of achieving diagnostic images in low-dose abdominal CT using a Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm.

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled 47 patients requiring contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans. The late-arterial phase scan was added and acquired using lower-dose mode (tube current range, 175-545 mA; 80 kVp for patients with BMI ≤24 kg/m2 and 100 kVp for patients with BMI > 24 kg/m2) and reconstructed with DLIR at medium setting (DLIR-M) and high setting (DLIR-H), ASIR-V at 0% (FBP), 40% and 80% strength. Both the quantitative measurement and qualitative analysis of the five types of reconstruction methods were compared. In addition, radiation dose and image quality between the early-arterial phase ASIR-V images using standard-dose and the late-arterial phase DLIR images using low-dose were compared.

RESULTS

For the late-arterial phase, all five reconstructions had similar CT value (P > 0.05). DLIR-H, DLIR-M and ASIR-V80% images significantly reduced the image noise and improved the image contrast noise ratio, compared with the standard ASIR-V40% images (P < 0.05). ASIR-V80% images had undesirable image characteristics with obvious "waxy" artifacts, while DLIR-H images maintained high spatial resolution and had the highest subjective image quality. Compared with the early-arterial scans, the late-arterial phase scans significantly reduced the radiation dose (P < 0.05), while the DLIR-H images exhibited lower image noise and good display of the specific image details of lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR algorithm improves image quality under low-dose scan condition and may be used to reduce the radiation dose without adversely affecting the image quality.

Image Quality Assessment of Abdominal CT by Use of New Deep Learning Image Reconstruction: Initial Experience

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to perform quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in contrast-enhanced oncologic CT of the abdomen. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review (April-May 2019) of the cases of adults undergoing oncologic staging with portal venous phase abdominal CT was conducted for evaluation of standard 30% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (30% ASIR-V) reconstruction compared with DLIR at low, medium, and high strengths. Attenuation and noise measurements were performed. Two radiologists, blinded to examination details, scored six categories while comparing reconstructions for overall image quality, lesion diagnostic confidence, artifacts, image noise and texture, lesion conspicuity, and resolution. RESULTS. DLIR had a better contrast-to-noise ratio than 30% ASIR-V did; high-strength DLIR performed the best. High-strength DLIR was associated with 47% reduction in noise, resulting in a 92-94% increase in contrast-to-noise ratio compared with that of 30% ASIR-V. For overall image quality and image noise and texture, DLIR scored significantly higher than 30% ASIR-V with significantly higher scores as DLIR strength increased. A total of 193 lesions were identified. The lesion diagnostic confidence, conspicuity, and artifact scores were significantly higher for all DLIR levels than for 30% ASIR-V. There was no significant difference in perceived resolution between the reconstruction methods. CONCLUSION. Compared with 30% ASIR-V, DLIR improved CT evaluation of the abdomen in the portal venous phase. DLIR strength should be chosen to balance the degree of desired denoising for a clinical task relative to mild blurring, which increases with progressively higher DLIR strengths.

Indeterminate liver lesions - a virtual epidemic: a cohort study over 8 years

BACKGROUND

Within the last decade, advances and availability in radiological imaging have led to an increase in the detection of incidental liver lesions (ILLs) in the asymptomatic patient population. This poses a diagnostic conundrum. This study was undertaken to review the outcome of liver lesions labelled as 'indeterminate' in asymptomatic patients without a biopsy-proven concomitant primary tumour. The secondary aim was to assess the impact on healthcare resources and cost-effectiveness with regards to the frequency and modality of radiological scans, multidisciplinary team discussions and clinic reviews.

METHODS

The study consisted of a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the University Hospitals of Leicester multidisciplinary team database. The study period ranged from 2010 to 2015. All patients were followed-up for 3 years to ensure no late re-occurrences with malignancy.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients with ILL were identified. The median age was 72 years. The median size of these ILLs was 10 mm. Eighty-seven patients required supplementary imaging and 42 required a third imaging. Ninety-one patients had benign lesions. Only one case was biopsy proven to be malignant.

CONCLUSION

Small (<15 mm) hepatic lesions discovered incidentally in patients with no known primary malignancy and risk factors are virtually always benign, with a 1% risk of malignancy. There is a need for a classification system, which stratifies ILLs by malignant potential based on a standardized and evidence-based approach. This is important to prevent unnecessary investigations. A multidisciplinary approach in an experienced hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre is recommended until such a classification exists.

Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to compare image quality and clinically significant lesion detection on deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and iterative reconstruction (IR) images of submillisievert chest and abdominopelvic CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Our prospective multiinstitutional study included 59 adult patients (33 women, 26 men; mean age ± SD, 65 ± 12 years old; mean body mass index [weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters] = 27 ± 5) who underwent routine chest (n = 22; 16 women, six men) and abdominopelvic (n = 37; 17 women, 20 men) CT on a 640-MDCT scanner (Aquilion ONE, Canon Medical Systems). All patients gave written informed consent for the acquisition of low-dose (LD) CT (LDCT) after a clinically indicated standard-dose (SD) CT (SDCT). The SDCT series (120 kVp, 164-644 mA) were reconstructed with interactive reconstruction (IR) (adaptive iterative dose reduction [AIDR] 3D, Canon Medical Systems), and the LDCT (100 kVp, 120 kVp; 30-50 mA) were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), IR (AIDR 3D and forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution [FIRST], Canon Medical Systems), and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) (Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine [AiCE], Canon Medical Systems). Four subspecialty-trained radiologists first read all LD image sets and then compared them side-by-side with SD AIDR 3D images in an independent, randomized, and blinded fashion. Subspecialty radiologists assessed image quality of LDCT images on a 3-point scale (1 = unacceptable, 2 = suboptimal, 3 = optimal). Descriptive statistics were obtained, and the Wilcoxon sign rank test was performed. RESULTS. Mean volume CT dose index and dose-length product for LDCT (2.1 ± 0.8 mGy, 49 ± 13mGy·cm) were lower than those for SDCT (13 ± 4.4 mGy, 567 ± 249 mGy·cm) (p < 0.0001). All 31 clinically significant abdominal lesions were seen on SD AIDR 3D and LD DLR images. Twenty-five, 18, and seven lesions were detected on LD AIDR 3D, LD FIRST, and LD FBP images, respectively. All 39 pulmonary nodules detected on SD AIDR 3D images were also noted on LD DLR images. LD DLR images were deemed acceptable for interpretation in 97% (35/37) of abdominal and 95-100% (21-22/22) of chest LDCT studies (p = 0.2-0.99). The LD FIRST, LD AIDR 3D, and LD FBP images had inferior image quality compared with SD AIDR 3D images (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. At submillisievert chest and abdominopelvic CT doses, DLR enables image quality and lesion detection superior to commercial IR and FBP images.

Dose and blending fraction quantification for adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction based on low-contrast detectability in abdomen CT

Purpose

The utilization of iterative reconstruction makes it difficult to identify the dose‐noise relationship, resulting in empirical design of scan protocols and inconsistent conclusions on dose reduction for consistent image quality. This study was to quantitatively determine the dose and the blending fraction of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) based on the specified low‐contrast detectability (LCD).

Methods

A tissue equivalent abdomen phantom and a GE discovery 750 HD computed tomography (CT) were utilized. The normality of the noise distribution was tested at various spatial scales (2.1–9.8 mm) in the presence of ASIR (10–100%) with a wide range of doses (2.24–38 mGy). The statically defined minimum detectable contrast (MDC) was used as the image quality metric. The parametric model decomposed the MDC into two terms: one with and the other without ASIR, each was related to the dose in the form of power law with factors and indices dependent on spatial scales. The parameters were identified by least‐square fitting to the experimental data. By considering the constraint of the blending fraction in the range of [0, 1], the dose and ASIR blending fraction were determined for any specified low‐contrast detectability (LCD), quantified by the MDC at the concerned lesion size.

Results

It was verified that noise distribution is normal in the presence of ASIR. It was also found that the noises obtained from the subtractions of adjacent slices had an underestimate of 20% as compared to the ground truth noises, regardless of the spatial scale, pitch, or ASIR blending fraction. The least‐square fitting for the parametric model resulted in correlation coefficients from 0.905 to 0.996. The root‐mean‐square errors ranged from 1.27% to 7.15%.

Conclusion

The parametric model can be used to form a look‐up‐table for dose and ASIR blending fraction. The dose choices may be substantially limited in some cases depending on the required LCD.

Prior iterative reconstruction (PIR) to lower radiation dose and preserve radiologist performance for multiphase liver CT: a multi-reader pilot study

PURPOSE

Prior iterative reconstruction (PIR) spatially registers CT image data from multiple phases of enhancement to reduce image noise. We evaluated PIR in contrast-enhanced multiphase liver CT.

METHODS

Patients with archived projection CT data with proven malignant or benign liver lesions, or without lesions, by reference criteria were included. Lower-dose PIR images were reconstructed using validated noise insertion from multiphase CT exams (50% dose in 2 phases, 25% dose in 1 phase). The phase of enhancement most relevant to the diagnostic task was selected for evaluation. Four radiologists reviewed routine-dose and lower-dose PIR images, circumscribing liver lesions and rating confidence for malignancy (0 to 100) and image quality. JAFROC Figures of Merit (FOM) were calculated.

RESULTS

31 patients had 60 liver lesions (28 primary hepatic malignancies, 6 hepatic metastases, 26 benign lesions). Pooled JAFROC FOM for malignancy for routine-dose CT was 0.615 (95% CI 0.464, 0.767) compared to 0.662 for PIR (95% CI 0.527, 0.797). The estimated FOM difference between the routine-dose and lower-dose PIR images was + 0.047 (95% CI - 0.023, + 0.116). Pooled sensitivity/specificity for routine-dose images was 70%/68% compared to 73%/66% for lower-dose PIR. Lower-dose PIR had lower diagnostic image quality (mean 3.8 vs. 4.2, p = 0.0009) and sharpness (mean 2.3 vs. 2.0, p = 0.0071).

CONCLUSIONS

PIR is a promising method to reduce radiation dose for multiphase abdominal CT, preserving observer performance despite small reductions in image quality. Further work is warranted.

Imaging Characteristics of Liver Metastases Overlooked at Contrast-Enhanced CT

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging characteristics of liver metastases overlooked at contrast-enhanced CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of 746 patients with a diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal, breast, gastric, or lung cancer between November 2010 and September 2017 were reviewed. Images were reviewed when liver metastases were first diagnosed, and images from prior contrast-enhanced CT examinations were checked if available. These lesions were classified into two groups: missed lesions (those missed on the prior images) and detected lesions (those correctly identified and invisible on the prior images or there were no prior images). Tumor size, contrast-to-noise ratio, location, presence of coexisting liver cysts and hepatic steatosis, and indications for examination were compared between the groups. The t test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze the imaging characteristics of previously overlooked lesions.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 137 lesions, of which 68 were classified as missed. In univariate analysis, contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly lower in missed lesions (95% CI, 2.65 ± 0.24 vs 3.90 ± 0.23; p < 0.001). The proportion of subcapsular lesions (odds ratio, 3.44; p < 0.001), hepatic steatosis (odds ratio, 6.35; p = 0.007), and examination indication other than survey of malignant tumors (odds ratio, 9.07; p = 0.02) were significantly higher for missed lesions.

CONCLUSION

Liver metastases without sufficient contrast enhancement, those in patients with hepatic steatosis, those in subcapsular locations, and those found at examinations for indications other than to assess for tumors were significantly more likely to be overlooked.

CT radiation dose reduction in patients with total hip arthroplasties using model-based iterative reconstruction and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of radiation dose reduction on image quality in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) combined with orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with metal-on-metal THAs received a pelvic CT with a full (FD) and a reduced radiation dose (RD) with -20%, -40%, -57%, or -80% CT radiation dose respectively, when assigned to group 1, 2, 3, or 4 respectively. FD acquisitions were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction, iDose⁴. RD acquisitions were additionally reconstructed with iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) levels 1-3 with different levels of noise suppression. CT numbers, noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in muscle, fat and bladder. Subjective image quality was evaluated on seven aspects including artefacts, osseous structures, prosthetic components and soft tissues.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups. While reducing radiation dose by 20%, 40%, 57%, or 80% in combination with IMR, CT numbers remained constant. Compared with iDose⁴, the noise decreased (p < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise ratios increased (p < 0.001) with IMR. O-MAR improved CT number accuracy in the bladder and reduced noise in the bladder, muscle and fat (p < 0.01). Subjective image quality was rated lower on RD IMR images than FD iDose⁴ images on all seven aspects (p < 0.05) and was not related to the applied radiation dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

In RD IMR with O-MAR images, CT numbers remained constant, noise decreased and contrast-to-noise ratios between muscle and fat increased compared with FD iDose⁴ with O-MAR images in patients with metal-on-metal THAs. Subjective image quality reduced, regardless of the degree of radiation dose reduction.

Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT

Purpose To evaluate colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis detection and characterization between reduced radiation dose (RD) and standard dose (SD) contrast material-enhanced CT of the abdomen and to qualitatively compare between filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction algorithms. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (from May 2017 through November 2017), 52 adults with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and suspected hepatic metastases at baseline CT underwent two portal venous phase CT scans: SD and RD in the same breath hold. Three radiologists, blinded to examination details, performed detection and characterization of 2-15-mm lesions on the SD FBP and RD adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)-V 60% series images. Readers assessed overall image quality and lesions between SD FBP and seven different iterative reconstructions. Two nonblinded consensus reviewers established the reference standard using the picture archiving and communication system lesion marks of each reader, multiple comparison examinations, and clinical data. Results RD CT resulted in a mean dose reduction of 54% compared with SD. Of the 260 lesions (233 metastatic, 27 benign), 212 (82%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%, 86%) were detected with RD CT, whereas 252 (97%; 95% CI: 94%, 99%) were detected with SD (P < .001); per-lesion sensitivity was 79% (95% CI: 74%, 84%) and 94% (95% CI: 90%, 96%) (P < .001), respectively. Mean qualitative scores ranked SD images as higher quality than RD series images, and ASIR-V ranked higher than ASIR and Veo 3.0. Conclusion CT evaluation of colorectal liver metastases is compromised with modest radiation dose reduction, and the use of iterative reconstructions could not maintain observer performance. © RSNA, 2018.

Advances in Pancreatic CT Imaging

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the advances in CT acquisition and image postprocessing as they apply to imaging the pancreas and to conceptualize the role of radiogenomics and machine learning in pancreatic imaging.

CONCLUSION

CT is the preferred imaging modality for assessment of pancreatic diseases. Recent advances in CT (dual-energy CT, CT perfusion, CT volumetry, and radiogenomics) and emerging computational algorithms (machine learning) have the potential to further increase the value of CT in pancreatic imaging.

Quantitative Measurements Versus Receiver Operating Characteristics and Visual Grading Regression in CT Images Reconstructed with Iterative Reconstruction: A Phantom Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of quantitative measurements with visual grading regression (VGR) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis in computed tomography (CT) images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CT scans on a liver phantom were performed on CT scanners from GE, Philips, and Toshiba at three dose levels. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative techniques (ASiR, iDose, and AIDR 3D of different strengths). Images were visually assessed by five readers using a four- and five-grade ordinal scale for liver low contrast lesions and for 10 image quality criteria. The results were analyzed with ROC and VGR. Standard deviation, signal-to-noise ratios, and contrast-to-noise ratios were measured in the images.

RESULTS

All data were compared to FBP. The results of the quantitative measurements were improved for all algorithms. ROC analysis showed improved lesion detection with ASiR and AIDR and decreased lesion detection with iDose. VGR found improved noise properties for all algorithms, increased sharpness with iDose and AIDR, and decreased artifacts from the spine with AIDR, whereas iDose increased the artifacts from the spine. The contrast in the spine decreased with ASiR and iDose.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved quantitative measurements in images reconstructed with iterative reconstruction compared to FBP are not equivalent to improved diagnostic image accuracy.

Dose Reduction With Dedicated CT Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm: CT Phantom Study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare reader accuracy detecting lesions near hardware in a CT phantom model at different radiation exposures using an advanced metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm and standard filtered back projection (FBP) techniques and to determine if radiation exposure could be decreased using MAR without compromising lesion detectability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A CT phantom manufactured with spherical lesions of various sizes (10-20 mm) and attenuations (20-50 HU) embedded around cobalt-chromium spheres attached to titanium rods, simulating an arthroplasty, was scanned on a single CT scanner (FLASH, Siemens Healthcare) at 140 kVp and 0.6-mm collimation using clinical-dose (300 Quality Reference mAs [Siemens Healthcare]), low-dose (150 Quality Reference mAs), and high-dose (600 Quality Reference mAs) protocols. Images reconstructed with iterative MAR, advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE), and FBP with identical parameters were anonymized and independently reviewed by three radiologists. Accuracies for detecting lesions, measured as AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, were compared.

RESULTS

Accuracy using MAR was significantly higher than that using FBP at all exposures (p values ranged from < 0.001 to 0.021). Sensitivity was also higher for MAR than for FBP at all exposures. Specificity was very high for both reconstruction techniques at all exposures with no significant differences. Accuracy of low-dose MAR was higher than and not inferior to standard-dose and high-dose FBP. MAR was significantly more sensitive than FBP in detecting smaller lesions (p = 0.021) and lesions near high streak artifact (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MAR improves reader accuracy to detect lesions near hardware and allows significant reductions in radiation exposure without compromising accuracy compared with FBP in a CT phantom model.

Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using SMART-RECON

In this paper, a newly developed statistical model-based image reconstruction [referred to as Simultaneous Multiple Artifacts Reduction in Tomographic RECONstruction (SMART-RECON)] is applied to low dose computer tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI). This method uses the nuclear norm of the spatial-temporal image matrix of the CT-MPI images as a regularizer, rather than a conventional spatial regularizer that incorporates image smoothness, edge preservation, or spatial sparsity into the reconstruction. In addition to providing the needed noise reduction for low-dose CT-MPI, SMART-RECON provides images with spatial resolution and noise power spectrum (NPS) properties, which are independent of contrast and dose levels. Both numerical simulations and in vivo animal studies were performed to validate the proposed method. In these studies, it was found that: 1) quantitative accuracy of perfusion maps in CT-MPI was well maintained for radiation dose level as low as 10 mAs per image frame, compared with the reference standard of 200 mAs for conventional filtered backprojection; 2) flow-occluded myocardium in the porcine heart was well delineated by SMART-RECON at 10 mAs per frame when compared with model-based image reconstruction using spatial total variation (TV) as the regularizer (referred to as TV-SIR) or spatial-temporal TV (ST-TV-SIR); the CT-MPI results were confirmed with positron-emission tomography imaging; 3) image sharpness in SMART-RECON images was nearly independent of image contrast level and radiation dose level, in stark contrast to TV-SIR and ST-TV-SIR, which displayed a strong dependence on both image contrast and radiation dose levels; and 4) the structure of the dose-normalized NPS for the SMART-RECON method did not depend on dose, while the TV-SIR and ST-TV-SIR NPS structure was dose-dependent.