Radiologic-pathologic correlation of interstitial lung abnormalities and predictors for progression and survival

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) is a radiographic term, which has recently undergone clarification of definition with creation of 3 subtypes. ILA is defined as incidental identification of computed tomography abnormalities in a patient who is not suspected of having an interstitial lung disease (ILD). A subset of ILA may progress to clinically significant ILD and is associated with morbidities not related to progression such as an increased incidence of sepsis-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ILA has been associated with an increased incidence of treatment-related complications in patients with lung cancer. Information on corresponding histology is limited; knowledge gaps exist concerning optimal patient management.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: Current Understanding

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental findings on computed tomography scans, characterized by nondependent abnormalities affecting more than 5% of any lung zone. They are associated with factors such as age, smoking, genetic variants, worsened clinical outcomes, and increased mortality. Risk stratification based on clinical and radiological features of ILAs is crucial in clinical practice, particularly for identifying cases at high risk of progression to pulmonary fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis index has emerged as a promising imaging biomarker for prognostic risk stratification in ILAs. These findings suggest a spectrum of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, encompassing from ILAs to pulmonary fibrosis.

Idiopathic dendriform pulmonary ossification as the phenotype of interstitial lung abnormalities: CT-pathologic correlation and prevalence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Idiopathic dendriform pulmonary ossification (DPO) is mostly asymptomatic, and detected incidentally in lung CT. There have been no reports on the precise CT-pathologic correlation and the prevalence of idiopathic DPO. This study aimed to clarify the histological background and prevalence of idiopathic DPO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with histologically confirmed idiopathic DPO (12 men and 4 women; mean age, 38.8 years; range 22-56 years) were identified in a nationwide epidemiological survey. Local HRCT findings of pre-biopsy examinations, such as branching, round, linear structures with or without high attenuation were compared side by side with histological findings. The attenuation of branching, round, and linear structures was classified into three-point levels on bone window images (width, 2500 HU; level, 500 HU). Furthermore, we collected continuous pulmonary CT images of 8111 cases for checking up metastasis from extrathoracic malignancy at a single institution, and evaluated the prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and DPO.

RESULTS

In all 16 cases, branching (n = 15, 93%), round (n = 5, 31%), or linear (n = 5, 31%) structures were identified, histologically corresponding to dendriform ossification and cicatricial organizing pneumonia (OP)/fibrosis. Histologically, ossification was confirmed in all the 16 patients. However, in two cases, a highly attenuated structure could not be detected on the pre-biopsy CT of the same area. Regarding the prevalence of idiopathic DPO, 283 (3.5%) of 8111 patients had ILAs, of which a total of 26 (0.3% of all cases, 9.2% of ILAs cases) had DPO.

CONCLUSION

Idiopathic DPO showed linear or branching structures with or without high attenuation on CT, corresponded to ossification, cicatricial OP/fibrosis. DPO was seen in 9.2% of ILAs cases. Idiopathic DPO is one of pathologic phenotypes of ILAs.

Association between interstitial lung abnormality and mortality in patients with esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and mortality in patients with esophageal cancer and the cause of mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study investigated patients with esophageal cancer from January 2011 to December 2015. ILAs were visually scored on baseline CT using a 3-point scale (0 = non-ILA, 1 = indeterminate for ILA, and 2 = ILA). ILAs were classified into subcategories of non-subpleural, subpleural non-fibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic. Five-year overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with and without ILAs using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on cancer stage and ILA subcategories. The prevalences of treatment complications and death due to esophageal cancer and pneumonia/respiratory failure were analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients with esophageal cancer (age, 66.8 years ± 8.6 [standard deviation]; 64 women) were evaluated in this study. Among them, 267 patients showed no ILAs, 125 patients were indeterminate for ILAs, and 86 patients showed ILAs. ILAs were a significant factor for shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.55, P = 0.016) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, smoking history, clinical stage, and histology. On subgroup analysis using patients with clinical stage IVB, the presence of ILAs was a significant factor (HR = 3.78, 95% CI 1.67-8.54, P = 0.001). Subpleural fibrotic ILAs were significantly associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.25-3.93, P = 0.006). There was no significant difference in treatment complications. Patients with ILAs showed a higher prevalence of death due to pneumonia/respiratory failure than those without ILAs (non-ILA, 2/95 [2%]; ILA, 5/39 [13%]; P = 0.022). The prevalence of death due to esophageal cancer was similar in patients with and without ILA (non-ILA, 82/95 [86%]; ILA 32/39 [82%]; P = 0.596).

CONCLUSION

ILAs were significantly associated with shorter survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Prevalence and prognostic meaning of interstitial lung abnormalities in remote CT scans of patients with interstitial lung disease treated with antifibrotic therapy

OBJECTIVES

To describe the prevalence and characteristics of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) in CT scans performed prior to the initiation of antifibrotics in a series of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and to identify characteristics apparent on early CT scans that could help to predict outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study. The original cohort consisted of 101 patients diagnosed with ILD and treated with antifibrotics in a tertiary hospital. Patients were included if they had a thoracic CT scan performed at least one year before initiation of therapy. They were classified radiologically in three groups: without ILA, with radiological ILA and extensive abnormalities. ILA were classified as subpleural fibrotic, subpleural non-fibrotic and non-subpleural. The initial scan and the latest CT scan performed before treatment were read for assessing progression. The relationship between CT findings of fibrosis and the radiological progression rate and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 50 patients. Only 1 (2%) had a normal CT scan, 25 (50%) had extensive alterations and 24 (48%) had radiological criteria for ILA, a median of 98.2 months before initiation of antifibrotics, of them 18 (75%) had a subpleural fibrotic pattern. Significant bronchiectasis and obvious honeycombing in the lower zones were associated with shorter survival (p = 0.04). Obvious honeycombing in the lower zones was also significantly (p < 0.05) associated with a faster progression rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrotic ILAs are frequent in remote scans of patients with clinically relevant ILD, long before they require antifibrotics. Findings of traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing in the earliest scans, even in asymptomatic patients, are related to mortality and progression later on.

Interstitial Lung Abnormality in Asian Population

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are radiologic abnormalities found incidentally on chest computed tomography (CT) that can be show a wide range of diseases, from subclinical lung fibrosis to early pulmonary fibrosis including definitive usual interstitial pneumonia. To clear up confusion about ILA, the Fleischner society published a position paper on the definition, clinical symptoms, increased mortality, radiologic progression, and management of ILAs based on several Western cohorts and articles. Recently, studies on long-term outcome, risk factors, and quantification of ILA to address the confusion have been published in Asia. The incidence of ILA was 7% to 10% for Westerners, while the prevalence of ILA was about 4% for Asians. ILA is closely related to various respiratory symptoms or increased rate of treatment-related complication in lung cancer. There is little difference between Westerners and Asians regarding the clinical importance of ILA. Although the role of quantitative CT as a screening tool for ILA requires further validation and standardized imaging protocols, using a threshold of 5% in at least one zone demonstrated 67.6% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, and 90.5% accuracy, and a 1.8% area threshold showed 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity in South Korea. Based on the position paper released by the Fleischner society, I would like to report how much ILA occurs in the Asian population, what the prognosis is, and review what management strategies should be pursued in the future.

Imaging of Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Update, From the AJR Special Series on Imaging of Fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis is recognized as occurring in association with a wide and increasing array of conditions, and it presents with a spectrum of chest CT appearances. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which corresponds histologically with usual interstitial pneumonia and represents the most common idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, is a chronic progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) of unknown cause. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) describes the radiologic development of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with ILD of a known or unknown cause other than IPF. The recognition of PPF impacts management of patients with ILD-for example, in guiding initiation of antifibrotic therapy. Interstitial lung abnormalities are an incidental CT finding in patients without suspected ILD and may represent an early intervenable form of pulmonary fibrosis. Traction bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis, when detected in the setting of chronic fibrosis, is generally considered evidence of irreversible disease, and progression predicts worsening mortality risk. Awareness of the association between pulmonary fibrosis and connective tissue diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, is increasing. This review provides an update on the imaging of pulmonary fibrosis, with attention given to recent advances in disease understanding with relevance to radiologic practice. The essential role of a multidisciplinary approach to clinical and radiologic data is highlighted.

Automated CT quantification of interstitial lung abnormality and interstitial lung disease according to the Fleischner Society in patients with resectable lung cancer: prognostic significance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic significance of automatically quantified interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) according to the definition by the Fleischner Society in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent lobectomy or pneumonectomy for NSCLC between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively included. Preoperative CT scans were analyzed using the commercially available deep-learning-based automated quantification software for ILA. According to quantified results and the definition by the Fleischner Society and multidisciplinary discussion, patients were divided into normal, ILA, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) groups.

RESULTS

Of the 1524 patients, 87 (5.7%) and 20 (1.3%) patients had ILA and ILD, respectively. Both ILA (HR, 1.81; 95% CI: 1.25-2.61; p = .002) and ILD (HR, 5.26; 95% CI: 2.99-9.24; p < .001) groups had poor recurrence-free survival (RFS). Overall survival (OS) decreased (HR 2.13 [95% CI: 1.27-3.58; p = .004] for the ILA group and 7.20 [95% CI: 3.80-13.62, p < .001] for the ILD group) as the disease severity increased. Both quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components were associated with poor RFS (HR, 1.57; 95% CI: 1.12-2.21; p = .009; and HR, 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01-1.23; p = .03) and OS (HR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06-2.37; p = .02; and HR, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33; and p = .01) in normal and ILA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The automated CT quantification of ILA based on the definition by the Fleischner Society predicts outcomes of patients with resectable lung cancer based on the disease category and quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Quantitative CT assessment of ILA provides prognostic information for lung cancer patients after surgery, which can help in considering active surveillance for recurrence, especially in those with a larger extent of quantified ILA.

KEY POINTS

• Of the 1524 patients with resectable lung cancer, 1417 (93.0%) patients were categorized as normal, 87 (5.7%) as interstitial lung abnormality (ILA), and 20 (1.3%) as interstitial lung disease (ILD). • Both ILA and ILD groups were associated with poor recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81, p = .002; HR, 5.26, p < .001, respectively) and overall survival (HR, 2.13; p = .004; HR, 7.20; p < .001). • Both quantified fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILA components were associated with recurrence-free survival and overall survival in normal and ILA groups.

Radiologic Progression of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities following Surgical Resection in Patients with Lung Cancer

In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and investigate the rates and risk factors associated with radiologic ILA progression among patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. Patients who underwent surgical resection for lung cancer at our institution from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated and grouped according to their ILA status as having no ILAs, equivocal ILAs, or ILAs. Progression was determined by simultaneously reviewing the baseline and corresponding follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans. Among 346 patients (median age: 67 (interquartile range: 60-74) years, 204 (59.0%) men), 22 (6.4%) had equivocal ILAs, and 33 (9.5%) had ILAs detected upon baseline CT. Notably, six patients (6/291; 2.1%) without ILAs upon baseline CT later developed ILAs, and 50% (11/22) of those with equivocal ILAs exhibited progression. Furthermore, 75.8% (25/33) of patients with ILAs upon baseline CT exhibited ILA progression (76.9% and 71.4% with fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILAs, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that ILA status was a significant risk factor for ILA progression. ILAs and equivocal ILAs were associated with radiologic ILA progression after surgical resection in patients with lung cancer. Hence, early ILA detection can significantly affect clinical outcomes.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Interstitial Lung Abnormality: Implication in Follow-Up Strategy and Risk Thresholds

Rationale: The optimal follow-up computed tomography (CT) interval for detecting the progression of interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is unknown. Objectives: To identify optimal follow-up strategies and extent thresholds on CT relevant to outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included self-referred screening participants aged 50 years or older, including nonsmokers, who had imaging findings relevant to ILA on chest CT scans. Consecutive CT scans were evaluated to determine the dates of the initial CT showing ILA and the CT showing progression. Deep learning-based ILA quantification was performed. Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for the time to ILA progression and progression to usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Measurements and Main Results: Of the 305 participants with a median follow-up duration of 11.3 years (interquartile range, 8.4-14.3 yr), 239 (78.4%) had ILA on at least one CT scan. In participants with serial follow-up CT studies, ILA progression was observed in 80.5% (161 of 200), and progression to UIP was observed in 17.3% (31 of 179), with median times to progression of 3.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-3.4 yr) and 11.8 years (95% CI, 10.8-13.0 yr), respectively. The extent of fibrosis on CT was an independent risk factor for ILA progression (hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.23]) and progression to UIP (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.07-1.80]). Risk groups based on honeycombing and extent of fibrosis (1% in the whole lung or 5% per lung zone) showed significant differences in 10-year overall survival (P = 0.02). Conclusions: For individuals with initially detected ILA, follow-up CT at 3-year intervals may be appropriate to monitor radiologic progression; however, those at high risk of adverse outcomes on the basis of the quantified extent of fibrotic ILA and the presence of honeycombing may benefit from shortening the interval for follow-up scans.

An observational cohort study of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in a large Japanese health screening population (Kumamoto ILA study in Japan: KILA-J)

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are subtle or mild parenchymal abnormalities observed in more than 5% of the lungs on computed tomography (CT) scans in patients in whom interstitial lung disease was not previously clinically suspected and is considered. ILA is considered to be partly undeveloped stages of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). This study aims to clarify the frequency of subsequent IPF or PPF diagnosis, the natural course from the preclinical status of the diseases, and the course after commencing treatment.

METHODS

This is an ongoing, prospective, multicentre observational cohort study of patients with ILA referred from general health screening facilities with more than 70,000 annual attendances. Up to 500 participants will be enrolled annually over 3 years, with 5-year assessments every six months. Treatment intervention including anti-fibrotic agents will be introduced in disease progression cases. The primary outcome is the frequency of subsequent IPF or PPF diagnoses. Additionally, secondary and further endpoints are associated with the efficacy of early therapeutic interventions in cases involving disease progression, including quantitative assessment by artificial intelligence.

DISCUSSION

This is the first prospective, multicentre, observational study to clarify (i) the aetiological data of patients with ILA from the largest general health check-up population, (ii) the natural course of IPF or PPF from the asymptomatic stage, and (iii) the effects and outcomes of early therapeutic intervention including anti-fibrotic agents for progressive cases of ILA. The results of this study could significantly impact the clinical practice and treatment strategy for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000045149.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities at CT in the Korean National Lung Cancer Screening Program: Prevalence and Deep Learning-based Texture Analysis

Background Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are associated with worse clinical outcomes, but ILA with lung cancer screening CT has not been quantitatively assessed. Purpose To determine the prevalence of ILA at CT examinations from the Korean National Lung Cancer Screening Program and define an optimal lung area threshold for ILA detection with CT with use of deep learning-based texture analysis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included participants who underwent chest CT between April 2017 and December 2020 at two medical centers participating in the Korean National Lung Cancer Screening Program. CT findings were classified by three radiologists into three groups: no ILA, equivocal ILA, and ILA (fibrotic and nonfibrotic). Progression was evaluated between baseline and last follow-up CT scan. The extent of ILA was assessed visually and quantitatively with use of deep learning-based texture analysis. The Youden index was used to determine an optimal cutoff value for detecting ILA with use of texture analysis. Demographics and ILA subcategories were compared between participants with progressive and nonprogressive ILA. Results A total of 3118 participants were included in this study, and ILAs were observed with the CT scans of 120 individuals (4%). The median extent of ILA calculated by the quantitative system was 5.8% for the ILA group, 0.7% for the equivocal ILA group, and 0.1% for the no ILA group (P < .001). A 1.8% area threshold in a lung zone for quantitative detection of ILA showed 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Progression was observed in 48% of visually assessed fibrotic ILAs (15 of 31), and quantitative extent of ILA increased by 3.1% in subjects with progression. Conclusion ILAs were detected in 4% of the Korean lung cancer screening population. Deep learning-based texture analysis showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting ILA with use of a 1.8% lung area cutoff value. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Egashira and Nishino in this issue.

Interstitial Lung Abnormalities at CT: Subtypes, Clinical Significance, and Associations with Lung Cancer

Interstitial lung abnormality (ILA) is defined as an interstitial change detected incidentally on CT images. It is seen in 4%-9% of smokers and 2%-7% of nonsmokers. ILA has a tendency to progress with time and is associated with respiratory symptoms, decreased exercise capability, reduced pulmonary function, and increased mortality. ILAs can be classified into three subcategories: nonsubpleural, subpleural nonfibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic. In cases of ILA, clinically significant interstitial lung disease should be identified and requires clinically driven management by a pulmonologist. Risk factors for the progression of ILA include clinical elements (ie, inhalation exposures, medication use, radiation therapy, thoracic surgery, physiologic findings, and gas exchange findings) and radiologic elements (ie, basal and peripheral predominance and fibrotic findings). It is recommended that individuals with one or more clinical or radiologic risk factors for progression of ILA be actively monitored with pulmonary function testing and CT. To avoid overcalling ILA at CT, radiologists must recognize the imaging pitfalls, including centrilobular nodularity, dependent abnormality, suboptimal inspiration, osteophyte-related lesions, apical cap and pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis-like lesions, aspiration, and infection. There is a close association between ILA and lung cancer, and many studies have reported an increased incidence of lung cancer, worse prognoses, and/or increased pulmonary complications in relation to cancer treatment in patients with ILA. ILA is considered to be an important comorbidity in patients with lung cancer. Accordingly, all radiologists involved with body CT must have sound knowledge of ILAs owing to the high prevalence and potential clinical significance of these anomalies. An overview of ILAs, including a literature review of the associations between ILAs and lung cancer, is presented. ©RSNA, 2022.

Relationship between Incidental Abnormalities on Screening Thoracic Computed Tomography and Mortality: A Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to assess the relationship between incidental abnormalities on thoracic computed tomography (CT) and mortality in a general screening population using a long-term follow-up analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected the medical records and CT images of 840 participants (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 58.5 ± 6.7 years; 564 male) who underwent thoracic CT at a single health promotion center between 2007 and 2010. Two thoracic radiologists independently reviewed all CT images and evaluated any incidental abnormalities (interstitial lung abnormality [ILA], emphysema, coronary artery calcification [CAC], aortic valve [AV] calcification, and pulmonary nodules). Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank and z-tests was performed to assess the relationship between incidental CT abnormalities and all-cause mortality in the subsequent follow-up. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to further identify risk factors of all-cause mortality among the incidental CT abnormalities and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Among the 840 participants, 55 (6%), 171 (20%), 288 (34%), 396 (47%), and 97 (11%) had findings of ILA, emphysema, CAC, pulmonary nodule, and AV calcification, respectively, on initial CT. The participants were followed up for a mean period ± SD of 10.9 ± 1.4 years. All incidental CT abnormalities were associated with all-cause mortality in univariable analysis (p < 0.05). However, multivariable analysis further revealed fibrotic ILA as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.22], p = 0.046). ILA were also identified as an independent risk factor for lung cancer or respiratory disease-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Incidental abnormalities on screening thoracic CT were associated with increased mortality during the long-term follow-up. Among incidental CT abnormalities, fibrotic ILA were independently associated with increased mortality. Appropriate management and surveillance may be required for patients with fibrotic ILA on thoracic CT obtained for general screening purposes.

Quantitative Assessment of Airway Changes in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Abnormality Patients by Chest CT According to Cumulative Cigarette Smoking

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Pi10 in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung abnormality (fibrotic ILA) in a chest CT, according to cumulative cigarette smoking. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 54 fibrotic ILA patients and 18 healthy non-smokers (control) who underwent non-enhanced CT and pulmonary function tests. We quantitatively analyzed airway changes (the inner luminal area, airway inner parameter, airway wall thickness, Pi10, skewness, and kurtosis) in the chest CT of fibrotic ILA patients, and the fibrotic ILA patients were categorized into groups based on pack-years: light, moderate, heavy. Airway change data and pulmonary function tests among the three groups of fibrotic ILA patients were compared with those of the control group by one-way ANOVA. Results: Mean skewness (2.58 ± 0.36) and kurtosis (7.64 ± 2.36) in the control group were significantly different from those of the fibrotic ILA patients (1.89 ± 0.37 and 3.62 ± 1.70, respectively, p < 0.001). In fibrotic ILA group, only heavy smokers had significantly increased Pi10 (mean increase 0.04, p = 0.013), increased airway wall thickness of the segmental bronchi (mean increase 0.06 mm, p = 0.005), and decreased lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (p = 0.023). Conclusion: Pi10, as a biomaker of quantitative CT in fibrotic ILA patients, can reveal that smoking affects airway remodeling.