Factors affecting postoperative respiratory tract function in type-C esophageal atresia. Thoracoscopic versus open repair

Outcomes After Thoracoscopic and Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula at US Children's Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) has been reported to have superior outcomes to the open approach. We sought to evaluate adoption of thoracoscopic repair at US children's hospitals and compare outcomes to open repair.

METHODS

The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify patients with EA/TEF who underwent repair between 2016 and 2023. Patients with birthweight less than 1800g and/or repair after the first 3 days of life were excluded. Postoperative complications, length of stay, and opioid requirements were assessed.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met in 618 patients. Eighty thoracoscopic repairs were reported (13 %). The proportion of thoracoscopic operations did not change over the study period. Infants managed with a thoracoscopic or open approach were demographically similar. Thoracoscopic repair was associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture (39 % vs. 26 %, p = 0.02), recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury (11 % vs 3 %, p = 0.001), and fewer days of postoperative opioid (5.2 vs. 6.5, p = 0.04). Other operative complications, LOS, and duration of TPN did not differ based on operative approach.

CONCLUSION

A small proportion of EA/TEF repairs in US children's hospitals were completed thoracoscopically and adoption of this approach did not increase between 2016 and 2023. Anastomotic stricture and RLN injury were significantly more likely after thoracoscopic repair. Although opioids were administered for one day fewer after thoracoscopic operations, no other metrics favored this approach. These data contrast with recent literature and suggest that the experience of high-volume hospitals may underestimate the morbidity of thoracoscopic EA/TEF repair and overestimate its benefits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Minimally invasive surgical approach in children treated for oesophageal atresia is associated with attention problems at school age: a prospective cohort study

The long-term neurodevelopment of children born with oesophageal atresia (OA) is unclear. Therefore, we assessed the neurocognitive domains and their predictors. Patients born with OA between February 2006 and December 2014, who were routinely seen at eight years as part of a structured prospective longitudinal follow-up program, were included. Main outcome measures were need for school support, performance in various neurocognitive domains and potential predictors of neurocognitive problems. We analysed data of 65 children with a mean (SD) age of 8.1 (0.2) years, of whom 89% with OA type C. Thirty-five (54%) surgical corrections were minimally invasive; the median (interquartile range) duration of exposure to anaesthetics in the first 24 months was 398 (296 - 710) minutes. Forty-four (68%) attended regular education without extra support and intelligence was within normal range (99-108). More than 50% had z-scores ≤ -2 on one or more neurocognitive domains, of which attention was the most frequently affected domain. The speed on the sustained attention task was significantly below normal (z-score -1.48 (2.12), p < .001), as was fluctuation of sustained attention (z-score -3.19 (3.80), p < .001). The minimally invasive approach and a lower socio-economic status (both p = 0.006) proved significant predictors for sustained attention problems in multivariable analyses.  Conclusion: Children who undergo minimally invasive surgery for OA correction are at risk for sustained attention problems at school age. Future studies unravelling the effects of perioperative events on neurodevelopment should lead to optimal surgical, anaesthesiological, and intensive care management in the neonatal period. What is Known: • School-aged children born with oesophageal atresia have normal intelligence but problems with sustained attention at eight years. What is New: • Oesophageal atresia patients, who undergo minimally invasive surgery or who have a background of lower socioeconomic status are at serious risk for sustained attention problems at school age. • Moreover, those who have been intubated for a longer period are at risk for stronger fluctuations in sustained attention.

Intraoperative Regional Cerebral Oxygenation During Pediatric Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background: Ventilating a pediatric patient during thoracoscopy is challenging. Few studies have highlighted the impact of capnothorax in children by measuring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rcSO2) with near infrared spectroscopy. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the data from relevant studies and assess whether thoracoscopy in children is associated with intraoperative pathological cerebral desaturation. Methods: The authors systematically searched four databases for relevant studies on the measurement of rcSO2 during pediatric thoracoscopic procedures. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with pathological desaturation, that is, >20% decline in the intraoperative rcSO2. Risk of bias among the included studies was estimated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: The systematic search resulted in 776 articles, of which 7 studies were included in the analysis. In total, 88 patients (99 procedures) with an age ranging from 0 days to 8.1 years were included. Of these, 43 (49%) patients were neonates. The included cohort had esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (n = 26), long-gap esophageal atresia (n = 5), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (n = 14), and congenital pulmonary airway malformations and other conditions needing lung resection (n = 43). Of the total 99 procedures, pathological desaturation was noticed in 13 (13.1%, 95% confidence interval 7.2-21.4) of them. Upon quality assessment, most of the studies were weaker in the selection and comparability domains. Conclusion: In this review, pathological cerebral desaturation was noticed in 13.1% of the pediatric thoracoscopic procedures. However, due to limited methodological quality of the included studies, further randomized multicentric studies comparing rcSO2 in open versus thoracoscopic surgeries are needed to derive definitive conclusions.

Thoracoscopic Versus Open Repair of Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes

Introduction: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare defect in the continuity of the esophagus, with the absent portion forming an upper and lower segment. Despite both thoracoscopic and conventional open repair (OR) techniques being well established worldwide, the literature remains unclear as to the comparison of surgical outcomes and efficacy of each procedure. Aim: To conduct a systematic review to determine which technique for EA repair, thoracoscopic or open, has the better outcome. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) compliant literature search returned 14 full text articles for analysis of demographic information and surgical outcomes. Results: Major comorbidities were more likely in the OR group (P < .05) with all other surgical outcomes comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Overall, this systematic review highlights that the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing thoracoscopic repair for EA are comparable with those of the conventional OR.

Intraoperative Bronchoscopic Inspection Facilitates Thoracoscopic Repair of Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Aim: The value of intraoperative bronchoscopic inspection (IBI) for accurate confirmation of the location and distance between the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and the proximal blind end of the esophagus (GAP) was evaluated in Type C esophageal atresia (EA)+TEF. Methods: IBI involved inserting the tip of a bronchoscope into the TEF and a nasogastric tube into the blind end of the EA and measuring GAP with fluoroscopy. EA+TEF patients (n = 23) treated thoracoscopically between 2007 and 2020 were classified according to IBI as IBI+ (n = 16) and IBI- (n = 7) to compare demographics, operative time, and time taken for TEF division. Results: Demographics were similar. Mean time for TEF division (15.4 ± 4.6 minutes for IBI+ versus 38.6 ± 20.9 minutes for IBI-; p < .05) and mean operative time (215.3 ± 48.9 minutes for IBI+ versus 286.4 ± 51.7 minutes for IBI+; p < .05) were significantly shorter. Mean GAP measured radiographically was 0.5 cm (range: 0-1.2 cm); mean GAP measured with IBI was 0.9 cm (range: 0-2.2 cm). Postoperative complications were 3 anastomotic leakages (1/16 in IBI+ and 2/7 in IBI-) that resolved without surgery and 8 strictures (3/16 in IBI+ and 5/7 in IBI-) treated by dilatation. Conclusions: IBI was effective for measuring GAP and is recommended for improving the efficiency of thoracoscopic repair.

Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: Outcomes from the Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Controversy persists regarding the ideal surgical approach for repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF). We examined complications and outcomes of infants undergoing thoracoscopy and thoracotomy for repair of Type C EA/TEF using propensity score-based overlap weights to minimize the effects of selection bias.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of two databases from multicenter retrospective and prospective studies examining outcomes of infants with proximal EA and distal TEF who underwent repair at 11 institutions was performed based on surgical approach. Regression analysis using propensity score-based overlap weights was utilized to evaluate outcomes of patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoracoscopy for Type C EA/TEF repair.

RESULTS

Of 504 patients included, 448 (89%) underwent thoracotomy and 56 (11%) thoracoscopy. Patients undergoing thoracoscopy were more likely to be full term (37.9 vs. 36.3 weeks estimated gestational age, p < 0.001), have a higher weight at operative repair (2.9 vs. 2.6 kg, p < 0.001), and less likely to have congenital heart disease (16% vs. 39%, p < 0.001). Postoperative stricture rate did not differ by approach, 29 (52%) thoracoscopy and 198 (44%) thoracotomy (p = 0.42). Similarly, there was no significant difference in time from surgery to stricture formation (p > 0.26). Regression analysis using propensity score-based overlap weighting found no significant difference in the odds of vocal cord paresis or paralysis (OR 1.087 p = 0.885), odds of anastomotic leak (OR 1.683 p = 0.123), the hazard of time to anastomotic stricture (HR 1.204 p = 0.378), or the number of dilations (IRR 1.182 p = 0.519) between thoracoscopy and thoracotomy.

CONCLUSION

Infants undergoing thoracoscopic repair of Type C EA/TEF are more commonly full term, with higher weight at repair, and without congenital heart disease as compared to infants repaired via thoracotomy. Utilizing propensity score-based overlap weighting to minimize the effects of selection bias, we found no significant difference in complications based on surgical approach. However, our study may be underpowered to detect such outcome differences owing to the small number of infants undergoing thoracoscopic repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Retrospective analysis of pneumothorax after repair of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula

Background

To analyze the possible causes, treatment and outcomes of postoperative pneumothorax in patients with Gross type C esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).

Methods

Medical records of patients with Gross type C EA/TEF who were diagnosed and treated in Beijing Children’s Hospital from January 2007 to January 2020 were retrospectively collected. They were divided into 2 groups according to whether postoperative pneumothorax occurred. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors for pneumothorax.

Results

A total of 188 patients were included, including 85 (45 %) in the pneumothorax group and 103 (55 %) in the non-pneumothorax group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative anastomotic leakage [P < 0.001, OR 3.516 (1.859, 6.648)] and mechanical ventilation [P = 0.012, OR 2.399 (1.210, 4.758)] were independent risk factors for pneumothorax after EA/TEF repair. Further analysis of main parameters of mechanical ventilation after surgery showed that none of them were clearly related to the occurrence of pneumothorax. Among the 85 patients with pneumothorax, 33 gave up after surgery and 52 received further treatment [conservative observation (n = 20), pleural puncture (n = 11), pleural closed drainage (n = 9), both pleural puncture and closed drainage (n = 12)]. All of the 52 patients were cured of pneumothorax at discharge.

Conclusions

Anastomotic leakage and postoperative mechanical ventilation were risk factors for pneumothorax after repair of Gross type C EA/TEF, but the main parameters of mechanical ventilation had no clear correlation with pneumothorax. After symptomatic treatment, the prognosis of pneumothorax was good.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-021-02948-x.

Primary repair of esophageal atresia is followed by multiple diagnostic and surgical procedures

BACKGROUND

Children born with esophageal atresia (EA) face comorbidities and complications often requiring surgery and anesthesia. We aimed to assess all procedures performed under general anesthesia during their first 12 years of life.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study about subsequent surgeries and procedures requiring general anesthesia in children born with type C EA between January 2007 and December 2017, with follow-up to March 2019.

RESULTS

Of 102 eligible patients, 63 were diagnosed with comorbidities, of whom 18 had VACTERL association. Follow-up time for all patients varied between 14 months and 12 years (median 7 years). The patients underwent total 637 procedures, median 4 [IQR2-7] per patient. In the first year of life, 464 procedures were performed, in the second year 69 and in the third year 29. Thirteen patients underwent no other procedures than primary EA repair. In 57 patients, 228 dilatations were performed. Other frequently performed procedures were esophagoscopy (n=52), urologic procedures (n=44) and abdominal procedures (n=33).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EA frequently require multiple anesthetics for a variety of procedures related to the EA, complications and comorbidities. This study can help care providers when counselling parents of a patient with an EA by giving them more insight into possible procedures they can be confronted with during childhood.

Association of operative approach with outcomes in neonates with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the impact of thoracoscopic repair on perioperative outcomes in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pediatric database from 2014 to 2018 was queried for all neonates who underwent operative repair of EA/TEF. Operative approach based on intention to treat was correlated with perioperative outcomes, including 30-day postoperative adverse events, in logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 855 neonates, initial thoracoscopic repair was performed in 133 (15.6%) cases. Seventy (53%) of these cases were converted to open. Those who underwent thoracoscopic repair were more likely to be full-term (p = 0.03) when compared to those in the open repair group. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcome measures based on surgical approach except for operative time (thoracoscopic: 217 min vs. open: 180 min, p<0.001). A major cardiac comorbidity (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1; p = 0.003) and preoperative ventilator requirement (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9; p = 0.034) were the only risk factors associated with adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic neonatal repair of EA/TEF continues to be used sparingly, is associated with high conversion rates, and has similar perioperative outcomes when compared to open repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Novel Device for Endoluminal Esophageal Atresia Repair: First-in-Human Experience

Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia (EA) repair affords many benefits to the patient; however, intracorporeal suturing of the anastomosis is technically challenging. Esophageal magnetic compression anastomosis (EMCA) is a compelling option for endoluminal EA repair, but available EMCA devices have prohibitive rates of recalcitrant stricture. Connect-EA is a new endoluminal EMCA device system that employs 2 magnetic anchors with a unique mating geometry designed to reliably create a robust anastomosis and decrease rates of leak and stricture. We describe our first-in-human experience with this novel endoluminal device for staged EA repair in 3 patients (Gross type A, B, and C) at high risk for conventional surgical repair. First, the esophageal pouches were approximated thoracoscopically. After acute tension subsided, the device anchors were endoscopically placed in the esophageal pouches and mated. Anchors were spontaneously excreted in 2 cases. Endoscopic repositioning and retrieval of the anchors were required in 1 patient because of narrowed esophageal anatomy. There were no perioperative complications. Patients were managed for 14 to 18 months. The strictures that developed in the patients were membranous and responded well to dilation alone, resolving after 4 to 5 outpatient dilations. Gastrostomies were closed between 6 and 11 months and all patients are tolerating full oral nutrition. Early experience with this new endoluminal EMCA device system is highly favorable. The device offers considerable benefit over conventional handsewn esophageal anastomosis and anastomotic outcomes are superior to available EMCA devices.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic or Conventional Thoracic Surgery in Infants and Children: Current Evidence

INTRODUCTION

 The pros and cons of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus conventional thoracic surgery in infants and children are still under debate. We assessed reported advantages and disadvantages of video-assisted thoracoscopy in pediatric surgical procedures, as well as the evidence level of the available data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A systematic literature search was performed to identify manuscripts comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic and the respective conventional thoracic approach in classic operative indications of pediatric surgery. Outcome parameters were analyzed and graded for level of evidence (according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine).

RESULTS

 A total of 48 comparative studies reporting on 12,709 patients, 11 meta-analyses, and one pilot randomized controlled trial including 20 patients were identified. More than 15 different types of advantages for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were described, mostly with a level of evidence 3b or 3a. Most frequently video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was associated with shorter hospital stay, shorter postoperative ventilation, and shorter time to chest drain removal. Mortality rate and severe complications did not differ between thoracoscopic and conventional thoracic pediatric surgery, except for congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair with a lower mortality and higher recurrence rate after thoracoscopic repair. The most frequently reported disadvantage for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was longer operative time.

CONCLUSION

 The available data point toward improved recovery in pediatric video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery despite longer operative times. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to justify the widespread use of video assisted thoracoscopy in pediatric surgery.

Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair: Outcomes Analysis Between Primary and Staged Procedures

PURPOSE

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is analyzed in this systematic review that compares outcomes between primary and staged repairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed/Embase databases were reviewed for articles on thoracoscopic repair of EA, and articles were selected for primary and staged repairs. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative parts of the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles identified between 1999 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria and offered 776 patients for this analysis. Primary repairs were performed in n=703 and staged repairs in n=73. Comparative analysis showed that esophageal anastomosis was performed using absorbable suture in 88% primary and 78% staged repairs. Anastomotic leak rates were comparable between primary n=65/696 (9%) and staged repairs n=8/73 (11%). The re-fistulation rate was 2% in primary and 1% in staged repairs. There was no difference between suture material and re-fistulation (P>0.05; NS). In primary repairs, nonabsorbable sutures were found to be associated with more leaks than absorbable sutures (P<0.05*). The conversion rate was similar between 2 approaches; primary n=49/680 (7%) and staged n=6/73 (8%); P>0.05. No significant differences were found in the rate of anastomosis strictures between primary n=135/703 (19%) and staged repair n=21/73 (29%); P>0.05. The overall mortality was n=20/703 (3%) in primary and n=1/73 (1%) in staged repairs; P>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful thoracoscopic primary- and staged-EA repairs have been reported with low rate of complications. Outcomes between primary and staged repairs do not show significant differences with regards to re-fistulation, anastomotic leaks, conversion rates, and mortality.

Thoracoscopic versus conventional open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates: A short-term comparative study

PURPOSE

Esophageal atresia with or without a tracheo-esophageal fistula is a challenging anomaly in neonates. Thoracoscopic repair is gaining popularity now in pediatric surgery community. The present study aims at comparing the short term outcomes of thoracoscopy versus classic thoracotomy for repair of such conditions.

METHODS

Thirty neonates with tracheoesophageal fistula were randomly divided into two equal groups (n=15) after excluding patients with birth weight <2000g, multiple associated anomalies and cardiorespiratory instability. One group had conventional open repair while the other had thoracoscopic repair. Demographic data, intraoperative result and post-operative findings were recorded and compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar results regarding demographic and patients' characteristics. Thoracoscopic repair had relatively longer, yet non-significant operative time but with highly significant difference in preserving azygos vein. There was low conversion rate with thoracoscopy (6.66%). Open repair resulted in a longer hospital stay (11.73±5.68 vs 9.2±2.95). Complication rate was comparable in both groups; however, thoracoscopy was associated with better cosmetic results as reported by parents and surgeons (p=0.00).

CONCLUSION

Compared to thoracotomy, thoracoscopic repair offers a less invasive, effective and safe technique with similar short term outcomes, but with superior cosmetic results and better ability to spare azygos vein.

TYPE OF STUDY

Therapeutic/Treatment study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Insufflation in minimally invasive surgery: Is there any advantage in staying low?

AIM

Minimally invasive repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is feasible and confers benefits compared to thoracotomy or laparotomy. However, carbon dioxide (CO₂) insufflation can lead to hypercapnia and acidosis. We sought to determine the effect of lower insufflation pressures on patients' surrogate markers for CO₂ absorption - arterial partial pressure of CO₂ (PaCO₂), end tidal CO₂ (EtCO₂) and pH.

METHODS

Single center retrospective review, including neonates without major cardiac anomaly. Selected patients formed 2 groups: Historical pressure (HP) group and low pressure (LP) group. We reported on the patients' preoperative characteristics that potentially confound the degree of CO₂ absorption or elimination. Outcome measures were perioperative PaCO₂, EtCO₂, arterial pH and anesthetic time.

RESULTS

30 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery for CDH and 24 patients for EA/TEF with similar distribution within the HP and LP group. For CDH patients as well as for EA/TEF patients, there were no significant differences in their preoperative characteristics or surgery duration comparing HP and LP groups. With a decrease in insufflation pressure in CDH patients, there were a significant decrease (p = 0.002) in peak PaCO₂ and an improvement in nadir pH (p = 0.01). For the EA/TEF patients, the decrease in insufflation pressure was associated with a significant decrease (p = 0.03) in peak EtCO₂. Considering all 54 patients, we found EtCO₂ to be highly significantly inversely correlated with pH and positively correlated with intraoperative PaCO₂ (p < 0.001). Baseline Hb was inversely correlated with mean EtCO₂ (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With lower insufflation pressures, CDH patients had significantly improved hypercapnia and acidosis, while EA/TEF patients had significantly reduced EtCO₂. EtCO₂ was correlated with acidosis and hypercapnia.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective case control study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical analysis of surgery for type III esophageal atresia via thoracoscopy: a study of a Chinese single-center experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the operation for type III esophageal atresia using a thoracoscope.

METHODS

The clinical data for 92 patients with type III esophageal atresia in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 49 patients in group A who underwent thoracoscopic surgery and 43 patients in group B who underwent conventional surgery.

RESULTS

The mechanical ventilation time (55.7 ± 11.4 h vs 75.6 ± 19.2 h), intensive care time (3.6 ± 1.8d vs 4.7 ± 2.0d), postoperative hospitalization time (13.1 ± 2.2d vs 16.8 ± 4.3d), thoracic drainage volume (62.7 ± 25.5 ml vs 125.4 ± 46.1 ml), blood transfusion volume (30.5 ± 10.4 ml vs 55.3 ± 22.7 ml) and surgical incision length (2.0 ± 0.5 cm vs 8.0 ± 1.8 cm) in group A were lower than those in group B, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Among the postoperative complications, the incidences of postoperative severe pneumonia (8.2% vs 23.3%), poor wound healing (2.0% vs 14.0%) and chest wall deformity (0% vs 11.6%) in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic stricture, tracheomalacia or gastroesophageal reflux between the two groups after surgery and early during follow-up (P > 0.05), and there were no complications such as achalasia signs and esophageal diverticulum in either group.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for type III esophageal atresia via thoracoscopy has the same safety and clinical effectiveness as traditional surgery and has the advantages of smaller incision and chest wall deformity.

Thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy for the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) require emergency surgery in the neonatal period to prevent aspiration and respiratory compromise. Surgery was once exclusively performed via thoracotomy; however, there has been a push to correct this anomaly thoracoscopically. In this study, we compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of both techniques. A systematic review and meta-analyses was performed. A search strategy was developed in consultation with a librarian which was executed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception until January 2017. Two independent researchers screened eligible articles at title and abstract level. Full texts of potentially relevant articles were then screened again. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. 48 articles were included. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in our primary outcome of total complication rate (OR 0.98, [0.29, 3.24], p = 0.97). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.55, [0.72, 3.34], p = 0.26), formation of esophageal strictures following anastomoses that required one or more dilations (OR 1.92, [0.93, 3.98], p = 0.08), need for fundoplication following EA repair (OR 1.22, [0.39, 3.75], p = 0.73)-with the exception of operative time (MD 30.68, [4.35, 57.01], p = 0.02). Considering results from thoracoscopy alone, overall mortality in patients was low at 3.2% and in most cases was due to an associated anomaly rather than EA repair. Repair of EA/TEF is safe, with no statistically significant differences in morbidity when compared with an open approach.Level of evidence 3a systematic review of case-control studies.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10-20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.

Perioperative management of esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal fistula: An analysis of data of 101 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

The perioperative management of esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal fistula by open or thoracoscopic approach can be complicated by metabolic derangements. Little is known, however, about the severity of derangements of vital and metabolic parameters in the perioperative period.

AIM

The aim of this study is to describe the perioperative courses of vital and metabolic parameters in 101 consecutive neonates undergoing surgical repair of esophageal atresia type C.

METHOD

In a retrospective cohort study, we extracted all data from the electronic anesthetic and medical charts of patients who underwent esophageal atresia type C repair within 30 days of life (2007-2017). We distinguished three types of surgery: primary open, primary thoracoscopic, and primary thoracoscopic surgery converted to open surgery. Descriptive analysis was applied.

RESULTS

The charts of 117 patients were reviewed: data of 101 were included. The perioperative anesthetic management was not standardized; various methods and medications were used for anesthesia induction and maintenance. Intraoperative blood gas analysis data of 72 patients were available and showed derangements regardless of type of surgery. The median pH-value decreased to 7.21 [IQR 7.14-7.30] and a pH-value below 7.20 was found in 29 patients; in four cases below 7.0, with the lowest value 6.83. The median PaCO₂ reached an upper level of 7.5kPa [IQR 5.8-9.2]; in 13 cases above 10.0kPa, with a peak value of 25.8kPa. These high PaCO₂ levels fluctuated with lowest measured PaCO₂ of median 5.6 [IQR 4.5-6.6], with the lowest value 2.8kPa. The median PaO₂ level reached an upper level of 16.9kPa [IQR 11.8-25.7], in 22 cases above 20.0kPa, with a peak value of 50.0kPa. These high levels fluctuated with lowest measured PaO₂ levels of median 8.3kPa [IQR 6.73-10.5]; the lowest PaO₂ value was 4.7 kPa.

CONCLUSION

Open and thoracoscopic correction of esophageal atresia were associated with periods of severe metabolic derangements. These events need to be taken into account for the evaluation of esophageal atresia (surgical) care and in evaluations of short- and long-term outcomes.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between open and thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was performed for a comparison of outcomes between open repair (OR) and thoracoscopic repair (TR) for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA with TEF).

METHODS

Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Medline, were searched systematically for the literatures aimed mainly at comparing the therapeutic effects for EA with TEF administrated by OR and TR. Corresponding data sets were extracted and two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 12.0.

RESULTS

Ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included, involving 447 subjects in total. It was observed that OR entailed a shorter operative time with significant statistical differences (SMD 0.604; 95% CI 0.344-0.864, P = 0). While TR was superior in two aspects: shorter length of hospital stay (SMD 0.584; 95% CI 0.214-0.953; P = 0.002) and shorter first oral feeding time (SMD 0.652; 95% CI 0.27-1.035; P = 0.001). However, meta-analyses of occurrence rate of leaks (OR, 1.747; 95% CI 0.817-3.737; P = 0.15), strictures (OR, 0.937; 95% CI 0.5-1.757; P = 0.839), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 0.21-5.44; P = 0.897), fundoplication rate of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (OR, 1.642; 95% CI 0.855-3.153; P = 0.601), and blood loss (SMD 0.048; 95% CI -1.292 to 1.388; P = 0.944) showed no significant differences between OR and TR. Meta-analysis of ventilation time showed similar outcome between OR and TR (SMD 0.474; 95% CI 0.02-0.968; P = 0.06), but the result remained controversial due to estimated result changing after sensitivity analysis (SMD 0.61; 95% CI 0.16-1.07; P = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with OR, a longer operative time was associated within TR group, although the TR procedure could possibly reduce the length of hospital stay and first oral feeding time. Meanwhile, the occurrence rate for leaks, strictures, pulmonary complications, and the fundoplication rate of GERD, and blood loss were similar between the OR and TR groups. Estimated result of ventilation time between the two groups remained ambiguous.

Changes in quality of life from infancy to school age after esophagoesophagostomy for tracheoesophageal fistula: thoracotomy versus thoracoscopy

BACKGROUND

We assessed the quality of life (QOL) of postoperative esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) cases, comparing open with thoracoscopic repair.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive EA/TEF repairs (2001-2014) was performed, excluding cases with birth weight less than 2000 g and severe cardiac/chromosomal anomalies. Of 37 cases, 13 had thoracoscopic repair (TR) and 24 had open repair (OR) according to the operating surgeon's preference. QOL was determined regularly by scoring responses to a standard questionnaire about oral intake, vomiting, bougienage, coughing, growth retardation, learning ability, and thoracic deformity. Lower scores reflected poorer outcome. QOL after TR and OR was compared 1 year postoperatively (POQ) and after starting school (ScQ).

RESULTS

Subject demographics were similar. Apart from two anastomotic leaks that resolved spontaneously after TR, there were no intraoperative complications or recurrence of TEF. Laparoscopic fundoplication was required for gastroesophageal reflux in four cases (OR 1; TR 3) (p = ns). QOL scores went from 6.5 → 11.5 in OR and 4.6 → 11.3 in TR, respectively. Final ScQ scores were similar, but POQ was significantly higher after OR (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Initial QOL scores were significantly lower after TR, but by school age QOL scores were similar.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: Basics of technique and its nuances

Aim:

To review the technique of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (TREAT) and results reported in literature and with authors’ experience.

Patients and Methods:

The technique of TREAT was reviewed in detail with evaluation in patients treated at authors’ institution. The patients were selected based on selection criteria and were followed postoperatively. The results available in literature were also reviewed.

Results:

A total of 29 patients (8 females) were operated by TREAT. Mean age was 2.8 days (range 2-6 days). Mean weight was 2.6 kg (range 1.8-3.2 kg). There was a leak in four patients, and two patients had to be diverted. They are now awaiting definitive repair. Twenty-one patients have completed a mean follow-up of 1.5 years and are doing well except for two patients who had a stricture and underwent serial esophageal dilatations. The results from current literature are provided in tabulated form.

Conclusions:

TREAT is now a well-established procedure and currently is the preferred approach wherever feasible. The avoidance of thoracotomy is a major advantage to the newborn and is proven to benefit the recovery in the postoperative patient. The technique demonstrated, and the tweaks reported make the procedure easy and is helpful to beginners. The outcome is very much comparable to the open repair as proven by various series. Various parameters like leak rate, anastomotic stricture are the same. The outcome is comparable if you TREAT these babies well.

Outcomes of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula repair: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A thoracoscopic approach for repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) has become a standard procedure in many pediatric surgical centers. However, whether thoracotomy or thoracoscopy offer advantages in terms of surgical outcomes is not known.

METHODS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic repair (TR) versus conventional open repair (COR) for EA with TEF.PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant literature until 2016.Studies comparing surgical outcomes of patients undergoing TR versus COR for EA with TEF were reviewed.The quality of each included study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale score. A fixed or random-effect model was applied depending on heterogeneity tests.

RESULTS

Eight observational clinical studies involving 452 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of 2 major postoperative complications (leaks and strictures) did not show significant differences between TR and COR. Overall estimates of the odds ratio (OR) of TR versus COR for leaks and strictures were: 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-3.20; P = 0.22) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.27-2.97; P = 0.86), respectively. However, meta-analysis of operation time (OR = 19.59, 95% CI = 0.77-38.40, P = 0.04), timing of extubation (OR = -2.50, 95% CI = -3.39 to -1.62, P < 0.001), time to 1st oral feeding (OR = -2.58, 95% CI = -3.79 to -1.36, P < 0.001), and duration of hospital stay (OR = -10.76, 95% CI = -16.39 to -5.12, P < 0.001) showed significant differences.No randomized controlled trial was included, and most studies had small sample sizes and were based on retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSION

TR and COR show a similar complication rates of leaks and strictures for EA/TEF repair. Although associated with a longer operative time, TR has the advantages of an earlier time to extubation and 1st oral feeding, and shorter hospital stay.

Neonatal brain oxygenation during thoracoscopic correction of esophageal atresia

Background

Little is known about the effects of carbon dioxide (CO₂) insufflation on cerebral oxygenation during thoracoscopy in neonates. Near-infrared spectroscopy can measure perioperative brain oxygenation [regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO₂)].

Aims

To evaluate the effects of CO₂ insufflation on rScO₂ during thoracoscopic esophageal atresia (EA) repair.

Methods

This is an observational study during thoracoscopic EA repair with 5 mmHg CO₂ insufflation pressure. Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO₂), partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (paCO₂), pH, and rScO₂ were monitored in 15 neonates at seven time points: baseline (T0), after anesthesia induction (T1), after CO₂-insufflation (T2), before CO₂-exsufflation (T3), and postoperatively at 6 (T4), 12 (T5), and 24 h (T6).

Results

MABP remained stable. SaO₂ decreased from T0 to T2 [97 ± 3–90 ± 6 % (p < 0.01)]. PaCO₂ increased from T0 to T2 [41 ± 6–54 ± 15 mmHg (p < 0.01)]. pH decreased from T0 to T2 [7.33 ± 0.04–7.25 ± 0.11 (p < 0.05)]. All parameters recovered during the surgical course. Mean rScO₂ was significantly higher at T1 compared to T2 [77 ± 10–73 ± 7 % (p < 0.05)]. Mean rScO₂ levels never dropped below a safety threshold of 55 %.

Conclusion

The impact of neonatal thoracoscopic repair of EA with insufflation of CO₂ at 5 mmHg was studied. Intrathoracic CO₂ insufflation caused a reversible decrease in SaO₂ and pH and an increase in paCO₂. The rScO₂ was higher at anesthesia induction but remained stable and within normal limits during and after the CO₂ pneumothorax, which suggest no hampering of cerebral oxygenation by the thoracoscopic intervention. Future studies will focus on the long-term effects of this surgery on the developing brain.