A high lymph node yield in colon cancer is associated with age, tumour stage, tumour sub-site and priority of surgery. Results from a prospective national cohort study

Lymph Node Yield and Long-Term Mortality Risk in Patients with Colon Cancer: A 20-Year Follow-Up National Study

BACKGROUND

Lymph node status is a well-established prognostic factor for colon cancer, but the optimal number of nodes for accurate staging remains unclear. This study explored the relationship between lymph node yield (LNY) and 5-year mortality rates in colon cancer patients in New Zealand.

METHODS

Data from the New Zealand Cancer Registry were retrospectively analyzed for patients with TNM stage I, II, and III colon cancer between August 2003 and December 2021, with follow-up until January 2024. The primary outcome was the 5-year all-cause mortality rate, with LNY, age, sex, ethnicity, tumor site, district health board (DHB), and the number of positive nodes as covariates. Statistical analyses included univariate analysis, Cox regression modeling, and chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

LNY was a significant predictor of 5-year mortality risk (hazard ratio 0.985, p < 0.0001), adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, tumor site, and DHB. The strongest association between LNY and mortality rate was observed at 12 nodes. Further increases in LNY beyond 22 nodes did not lead to statistically significant differences in mortality rates. Lymph node ratio (LNR) was strongly associated with survival in stage III colon cancer, independent of LNY and the number of positive nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher LNY is significantly associated with reduced 5-year mortality rates in stage I-III colon cancer up to the 22-node mark. The strong correlation between LNR and mortality highlights its potential value for improving treatment planning in future clinical practice.

Evaluating Surgical Outcomes and Survival in Colon Cancer Patients Over 80 Years Old

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the context of an increasing older population, knowing the surgical outcomes of older patients is of paramount importance to define a comprehensive strategy for colon cancer treatment in these patients. This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes and survival of patients over 80 years old undergoing surgery for colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an observational retrospective longitudinal study of patients over 80 years old with colon cancer diagnosis who underwent surgery for this condition, between 2018 and 2021, in a Portuguese hospital. Demographic and clinical features were characterized. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Out of 90 patients in the study, 41.1% were female. The majority (56.7%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or 0, with a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 7.0. Tumors were primarily located in the right colon (52.2%) and sigmoid colon (25.6%), with most patients having stage II (35.6%) or stage III (25.5%) disease. Elective surgeries accounted for 73% of procedures, and 80.0% had curative intent, with laparoscopic surgery performed in 66.7% of cases. Only 8.3% of those undergoing curative-intent procedures received adjuvant chemotherapy. Emergent admissions were associated with more advanced cancer stages, higher rates of palliative intent procedures (45.8% versus 10.6%, p < 0.001), and more open surgeries (75.0% versus 9.1%, p < 0.001) when compared to elective procedures. Postoperative mortality was higher in the emergent group (20.8% versus 10.6%), though there was no association between the type of admission and postoperative complications. Median overall survival for all patients was 36.7 (95% CI 28.1 to 45.3) months, with significant differences between curative-intent and palliative surgeries (median of 39.8 (95% CI 32.6 to 47.0) versus 10.6 (95% CI 0.67 to 20.5) months, p = 0.015). The elective group of patients had significantly better overall survival compared to the emergent group (median of 36.7 (95% CI 30.7 to 42.7) versus 11.9 (95% CI 6.0 to 17.8) months, p = 0.01). Among the patients who underwent curative-intent procedures, there were no significant differences in overall or disease-free survival between elective and emergent groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased complexity of managing older patients, particularly in emergent cases, these findings emphasize the importance of elective, curative-intent surgeries to optimize overall survival. Effective treatment strategies and perioperative management tailored to this age group are essential for improving surgical outcomes and extending survival in elderly colon cancer patients.

Has the open surgical approach in colorectal cancer really become uncommon?

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. Surgery is mandatory to treat patients with colorectal cancer. Can colorectal cancer be treated in laparoscopy? Scientific literature has validated the oncological quality of laparoscopic approach for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized non-inferiority trials with good remote control have answered positively to this long-debated question. Early as 1994, first publications demonstrated technical feasibility and compliance with oncological imperatives and, as far as short-term outcomes are concerned, there is no difference in terms of mortality and post-operative morbidity between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches, but only longer operating times at the beginning of the experience. Subsequently, from 2007 onwards, long-term results were published that demonstrated the absence of a significant difference regarding overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, local and distant recurrence rates between open and minimally invasive surgery. In this editorial, we aim to summarize the clinical and technical aspects which, even today, make the use of open surgery relevant and necessary in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.

Prognostic Value of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio and Identification of Factors Influencing the Lymph Node Yield in Patients Undergoing Curative Colon Cancer Resection

Due to the impact of nodal metastasis on colon cancer prognosis, adequate regional lymph node resection and accurate pathological evaluation are required. The ratio of metastatic to examined nodes may bring an additional prognostic value to the actual staging system. This study analyzes the identification of factors influencing a high lymph node yield and its impact on survival. The lymph node ratio was determined in patients with fewer than 12 or at least 12 evaluated nodes. The study included patients after radical colon cancer resection in UICC stages II and III. For the lymph node ratio (LNR) analysis, node-positive patients were divided into four categories: i.e., LNR 1 (<0.05), LNR 2 (≥0.05; <0.2), LNR 3 (≥0.2; <0.4), and LNR 4 (≥0.4), and classified into two groups: i.e., those with <12 and ≥12 evaluated nodes. The study was conducted on 7012 patients who met the set criteria and were included in the data analysis. The mean number of examined lymph nodes was 22.08 (SD 10.64, median 20). Among the study subjects, 94.5% had 12 or more nodes evaluated. These patients were more likely to be younger, women, with a lower ASA classification, pT3 and pN2 categories. Also, they had no risk factors and frequently had a right-sided tumor. In the multivariate analysis, a younger age, ASA classification of II and III, high pT and pN categories, absence of risk factors, and right-sided location remained independent predictors for a lymph node yield ≥12. The univariate survival analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated a better five-year overall survival (OS) in patients with at least 12 lymph nodes examined (68% vs. 63%, p = 0.027). The LNR groups showed a significant association with OS, reaching from 75.5% for LNR 1 to 33.1% for LNR 4 (p < 0.001) in the ≥12 cohort, and from 74.8% for LNR2 to 49.3% for LNR4 (p = 0.007) in the <12 cohort. This influence remained significant and independent in multivariate analyses. The hazard ratios ranged from 1.016 to 2.698 for patients with less than 12 nodes, and from 1.248 to 3.615 for those with at least 12 nodes. The LNR allowed for a more precise estimation of the OS compared with the pN classification system. The metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent predictor for survival and should be included in current staging and therapeutic decision-making processes.

Association between the number of retrieved lymph nodes and demographic/tumour-related characteristics in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice guidelines recommend retrieving at least 12 lymph nodes for correct staging in colorectal cancer. However, it is difficult to retrieve adequate lymph nodes because of various factors. We aimed to evaluate the association between the number of retrieved lymph nodes and demographic/tumour-related characteristics in colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science were searched from January 2016 to June 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies that evaluated the association between retrieved lymph nodes and demographic/tumour-related characteristics in colorectal cancer were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

OR with 95% conference intervals was extracted and pooled.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies containing 2 05 821 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that fewer nodes were retrieved from elderly patients (OR=0.70, 95% CI (0.54 to 0.90), p=0.005), and from tumours located in the left colon than in the right colon (OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.33 to 0.56), p<0.001). More lymph nodes were obtained from females than males (OR=1.15, 95% CI (1.04 to 1.28), p=0.006), from the advanced T stage (T3+T4) than T1+T2 stage (OR=1.57, 95% CI (1.25 to 1.97), p<0.001) and from the N2 stage than N0 stage (OR=1.32, 95% CI (1.15 to 1.51), p<0.001). Body mass index, ethnicity, N1 stage, M stage, tumour differentiation and lymph-vascular invasion were not significantly associated with the lymph node yield.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results suggest that clinicians have an increased opportunity to retrieve sufficient lymph nodes for accurate pathological staging to guide treatment decisions in patients with colorectal cancer who are young, female, with tumours located in the right colon, advanced T stage and N2 stage.

The effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing using India ink on lymph node yield in laparoscopic colectomy for stage I right-sided colon cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative endoscopic tattooing using India ink (ETI) on the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) dissected during laparoscopic surgery for stage I right-sided colon cancer (RCC).

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included stage I RCC patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and December 2021. The clinicopathological background and number of LNs retrieved were compared between patients managed with and without ETI. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the effect of independent variables on the LN yield.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients were enrolled. Of these, 89 patients (52.7%) were classified into the ETI group, and 80 (47.3%) were classified into the no-ETI group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, or tumor progression between the two groups. A univariate analysis showed that the number of LNs retrieved was significantly higher in female (26 vs. 24, p = 0.026), with tumor localization in the ascending or transverse colon (20 in the cecum, 26 in the ascending colon, 27 in the transverse colon, p < 0.001), and with preoperative ETI (28 vs. 21, p < 0.001). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, female sex (p = 0.0011), D3 lymphadenectomy (p = 0.046), and preoperative ETI (p = 0.012) were independently associated with the LN yield.

CONCLUSION

In laparoscopic surgery for stage I RCC, preoperative ETI increased the number of LNs retrieved and allowed for appropriate staging.

The impact of tumor location on long-term survival outcomes in patients with right-sided colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The oncologic outcomes of right-sided cancers are generally grouped in studies. We hypothesized that tumor location (cecal vs. ascending vs. hepatic flexure) may influence cancer-specific outcomes.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for patients over 18 with non-metastatic, invasive (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I-III) right-sided adenocarcinoma of the colon from 1988 to 2014 who underwent partial colectomy. Patients were categorized into groups: (1) cecum (2) ascending colon (3) hepatic flexure. Demographic, clinical and pathologic factors were compared between groups. Disease-specific and overall survival were described using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis determined the independent association of primary tumor location.

RESULTS

We identified 167,450 patients. Mean age was 72.2 ± 12.3 years and 54.9% were female. Of these, 81,611, 66,857, and 18,982 had cecal, ascending colon, and hepatic flexure cancers, respectively. Cecal cancers were associated with a lower number of examined nodes but a higher likelihood of nodal positivity. Cecal cancer patients were significantly older, had larger tumors, and higher tumor stage. On univariate analysis, cecal cancers were associated with poorer disease-specific and overall survival (all p values < 0.001). On multivariate analysis controlling for sex, age, tumor size, number of examined nodes and stage, hepatic flexure cancers were associated with worse disease-specific (HR 1.05) and overall survival (HR 1.03).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic flexure cancers are associated with worse survival compared to more proximal colon cancers. The cause is likely multifactorial, including biological and technical factors. More aggressive surgical and multimodal therapy may be considered for hepatic flexure colon cancers.

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Lymph Node Yield and Positivity in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Cancers

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of cancer‐related deaths worldwide and is the third most common cause of cancer deaths in the UK. The status of lymph node metastasis is a key factor for predicting the prognosis of a patient's CRC.

Aims

This study aimed to analyze the demographics of left-sided colonic and rectal cancers at a single institution. We looked closely at the correlation between patient age and various histological factors. We tried to find any significant difference in lymph node yield (LNY) between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS). We aimed to identify any statistical correlation between LNY and lymph node positivity (LNP) with other patient, surgical and histopathological features.

Methodology

This is a retrospective, non-interventional review of consecutive patients who underwent left-sided colonic and rectal cancer resections over a three-year period between 01 April 2018 and 31 March 2021. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used. Chi-squared / Fisher exact test was used on a categorical scale between two or more groups and non-parametric setting for qualitative data analysis.

Results

A total of 102 patients were included in the study. No statistical correlation was found between the age of the patient with the LNY, LNP, location of the tumor, type, and urgency of the operation. LNY ranged between one and 43 nodes (median (interquartile range (IQR)) 17, 8). There was no statistically significant difference in LNY between laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) (p=0.1449). Significant statistical correlation was identified between LNP and completeness of resection (CoR) (p=0.039), vascular invasion (VI) (p<0.001), perineural invasion (PI) (p<0.001), and circumferential resectional margin involvement (CRMI) (p=0.039).

Discussion

LNY and LNP are important prognostic indices in colorectal cancer. Patient age, tumor location, the urgency of surgery, and consultant experience did not significantly impact the LNY. Our study showed a positive correlation between LNP and CRMI, VI and PI comparable to literature. Contrary to other studies, we found no statistical significance between LS vs. OS and LNY. Whether 12 nodes per patient is an appropriate level remains controversial.

Prognostic importance of lymph node count and ratio in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node count (LNC) and lymph node ratio (LNR) in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) for Stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from a cross-sectional study including 71 Dutch centres. Primary outcome parameters were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic significance of LNC and LNR (cut-off values 0.15, 0.20, 0.30) was tested for different (sub)groups.

RESULTS

From 2095 registered patients, 458 were included, of which 240 patients with LNC < 12 and 218 patients with LNC ≥ 12. LNC was not significantly associated with DFS (p = 0.35) and OS (p = 0.59). In univariable analysis, LNR was significantly associated with DFS and OS in the whole cohort and LNC subgroups, but not in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

LNC was not associated with long-term oncological outcome in rectal cancer patients treated with CRT, nor was LNR when corrected for N-stage. However, LNR might be used to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with a favourable outcome.

Lymph Node Yield and Ratio in Selective and Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer-Impact on Oncological Outcome

Background: Lymph node metastases are associated with poor prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Neck dissection (ND) is often performed prior to or after (chemo)radiation (CRT) and is an integral part of HNSCC treatment strategies. The impact of CRT delivered prior to ND on lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) has not been comprehensively investigated. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2014 to 30 June 2019 at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland. We included 252 patients with primary HNSCC who underwent NDs either before or after CRT. LNY and LNR were compared in patients undergoing ND prior to or after CRT. A total of 137 and 115 patients underwent modified radical ND (levels I to V) and selective ND, respectively. The impact of several features on survival and disease control was assessed. Results: Of the included patients, 170 were male and 82 were females. There were 141 primaries from the oral cavity, 55 from the oropharynx, and 28 from the larynx. ND specimens showed a pN0 stage in 105 patients and pN+ in 147. LNY, but LNR was not significantly higher in patients undergoing upfront ND than in those after CRT (median: 38 vs. 22, p < 0.0001). Cox hazard ratio regression showed that an LNR ≥ 6.5% correlated with poor overall (HR 2.42, CI 1.12-4.89, p = 0.014) and disease-free survival (HR 3.416, CI 1.54-754, p = 0.003) in MRND. Conclusion: ND after CRT leads to significantly reduced LNY. An LNR ≥6.5% is an independent risk factor for decreased overall, disease-free, and distant metastasis-free survival for MRND.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches Are Safe and Appropriate in N2 Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

There is emerging evidence of the oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in T4 colorectal cancer; however, such support is lacking in N2 disease.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare oncological and perioperative outcomes of surgical resection for N2 colorectal cancer using an open versus minimally invasive approach.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's generic and targeted colectomy data sets.

SETTINGS

Data about surgery for N2 colorectal cancer were obtained regarding North American hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing elective surgical resection for N2 colorectal cancer in participating hospitals between 2014 and 2018 were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical resection of N2 colorectal cancer was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Our primary outcome was nodal yield. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1837 patients underwent open and 3907 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery colectomies for N2 colorectal cancer (n = 5744). Median nodal yield was 20 (interquartile range, 15-27) in the open group and 21 (interquartile range, 16-28) in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.0001); however, nodal harvest between the 2 groups was not significantly different on multivariate analysis. Perioperative complications were higher on univariate analysis in the open surgery group, with respect to key outcomes including anastomotic leak and death (p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its retrospective design and by the fact that the staging data collected by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are pathological rather than clinical; however, prior studies found a 97% concordance between pathological and clinical N2 determination.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery approaches to colorectal cancer with N2 disease result in equivalent nodal harvests compared with open approaches. Our group supports the use of a minimally invasive approach in advanced nodal stage colorectal cancer in the appropriately selected patient. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B417.

LOS ABORDAJES QUIRRGICOS MNIMAMENTE INVASIVOS SON SEGUROS Y APROPIADOS EN EL CNCER COLORRECTAL N

ANTECEDENTES:Existe evidencia emergente de la seguridad oncológica de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva en el cáncer colorrectal T4; sin embargo, semenjante apoyo falta en la enfermedad N2.OBJETIVO:comparar los resultados oncológicos y perioperatorios de la resección quirúrgica para el cáncer colorrectal N2 utilizando un abordaje abierto versus mínimamente invasivo.DISEÑO:Realizamos un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando los conjuntos de datos de colectomía genéricos y específicos del Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica.AJUSTE:Hospitales de Norte America que participan en el Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes sometidos a resección quirúrgica electiva por cáncer colorrectal N2 en los hospitales participantes entre 2014 y 2018.INTERVENCIONES:Resección quirúrgica de cáncer colorrectal N2.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VOLORACION:Nuestro resultado principal fue el rendimiento nodal. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron complicaciones perioperatorias y mortalidad.RESULTADOS:1837 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía abierta y 3907 pacientes fueron sometidos a colectomías de cirugía mínimamente invasiva por cáncer colorrectal N2 (n = 5744). La mediana del rendimiento nodal fue 20 (IQR 15-27) en el grupo abierto y 21 (IQR 16-28) en el grupo mínimamente invasivo (p <0,0001); sin embargo, el rendimiento nodal entre los dos grupos no fue significativamente diferente en el análisis multivariado. Las complicaciones perioperatorias fueron mayores en el análisis univariado en el grupo de cirugía abierta, con respecto a los resultados clave, incluida la fuga anastomótica y la muerte (p <0,001).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y por el hecho de que los datos de estadificación recopilados por NSQIP son patológicos más que clínicos; sin embargo, estudios previos encontraron una concordancia del 97% entre la determinación patológica y clínica de N2.CONCLUSIONES:Los enfoques de cirugía mínimamente invasiva para el cáncer colorrectal con enfermedad N2 dan rendimientos nodales equivalentes a abordajes abiertos. Nuestro grupo apoya el uso de abordaje mínimamente invasivo en el cáncer colorrectal avanzado en estadio ganglionar en el paciente adecuadamente seleccionado. Consulte Video Resumenhttp://links.lww.com/DCR/B417.

The association between the composite quality measure "textbook outcome" and long term survival in operated colon cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between textbook outcome and survival in patients with surgically treated colon cancer. A total of 804 surgical cases were enrolled between June 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014. Textbook outcome was defined as patients who had colon cancer surgery and met the six healthcare parameters of surgery within 6 weeks, radical resection, lymph node (LN) yield ≥12, no ostomy, no adverse outcome and colonoscopy before/after surgery within 6 months. The effect of textbook outcome on 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox regression model was used to find significant independent variables and stratified analysis used to determine whether text-book outcome had a survival benefit. A textbook outcome was achieved in 59.5% of patients undergoing colon cancer surgery. Important obstacles to achieving textbook outcome were no stomy, no adverse outcome and LN yield ≥12. Patients with text-book outcome had statistically significant better 5-year DSS compared to those with-out (80.1% vs. 58.3%). Multivariate analyses indicated that colon cancer patients with textbook outcome had better 5-year DSS after adjusting for various confounders ([aHR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.57). Thus, besides being an index of short-term quality of care, textbook outcomes could be used as a prognosticator of long-term outcomes, such as 5-year survival rates.

Impact of Radiotherapy on Neck Dissection Nodal Count in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Our study aimed to review the impact of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and other factors on the lymph node count of neck dissection (ND) specimens from patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). A retrospective study was conducted on all patients with head and neck cancers who had undergone NDs in Singapore General Hospital between 1992 and 2013.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into two groups: patients treated with RT with or without chemotherapy before ND and patients who had undergone ND surgery without previous history of RT. The primary endpoint for this study would be the lymph node count from ND.

RESULTS

The study cohort consists of 1,024 NDs on 829 patients. There were 597 (58.3%) radical/modified radical NDs involving levels I-V. Within this group, 75 (12.6%) NDs had preoperative RT. Preoperative RT and age were found to significantly reduce nodal yield in both univariate and multivariate analysis in the radical/modified radical ND subgroup. In our multivariate analysis, preoperative RT was shown to decrease the nodal yield by 7.464 (P = .0002, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.35 to -3.58). Advanced age independently decreases nodal yield, even after accounting for the effect of RT (P = .0002, 95% CI: -0.27 to -0.08). In addition, preoperative RT has a more pronounced effect in reducing lymph node count in the older age group.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative RT and advanced age are independent and synergistic factors that reduce nodal count from NDs in patients with head and neck cancers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130: 1947-1953, 2020.

How does lymph node yield affect survival outcomes of stage I and II colon cancer?

Background

According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for cancer of the colon, a minimum of 12 lymph nodes (LN) has to be sampled for accurate staging. This has bearing on the long-term prognosis and the need for adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to revisit the association of lymph node yield and the long-term survival in patients with stages I and II, i.e. node-negative, colon cancer.

Method

Consecutive patients who underwent elective or emergency curative resections for cancer of colon between the years 2003 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with stage I or II diseases (AJCC 8th edition) were included. They were analysed in three groups, LN<12, LN12-19 and LN≥20. Their clinic-pathological characteristics were compared. The disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.

Results

There was a total of 659 patients included in the analysis. Twelve or more LN were found in 65.6% of the specimens. The mean follow-up was 83.9 months. LN≥20 had significantly better DFS (p = 0.015) and OS (p = 0.036), whereas LN<12 had similar DFS and OS when compared to LN12-19. The advantage in DFS and OS were mainly seen in those with stage II diseases. A lymph node yield of greater than 20 was one of the predictors of favourable DFS, hazard ratio 0.358; 95% CI 0.170–.756, p = 0.007.

Conclusion

The lymph node yield had a significant association with survival outcomes. A lymph node yield of 20 or more was associated with better survival outcomes. On the other hand, lymph node yield less than 12 was not shown to have inferior survival outcomes when compared to those between 12 and 19.

Exploration of exact significance of lymph node ratio and construction of a novel stage in colon cancer with no distant metastasis

Aim

Lymph node ratio (LNR) seems to be more precise than classic N stage in classifying cancer stage. Thus, we aim to construct a modified classification system based on LNR for colon cancer without distant metastasis.

Methods

This study enrolled two independent cohorts of patients. The primary cohort enrolled 2,152 patients from 2008 to 2013 in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The validation cohort consisted of 77,406 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 2004 to 2014. The inclusion criteria were: pathologically confirmed colon cancer, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I/II/III. The exclusion criteria included: incomplete follow-up information, rectal cancer, and multiple primary sites. The prognostic value of LNR for overall survival was evaluated. The cutoff value of LNR was determined by the X-tile. Predictive performance of modified classification was determined by the concordance index.

Results

After analysis, 0.05 and 0.50 were determined as the best threshold values of LNR. A value of <0.05, 0.05–0.50 and >0.50 was reclassified as the mN0, mN1 and mN2 stage. A modified classification based on mN0, mN1, and mN2 was further constructed for stage I/II/III colon cancer. C-index of the modified classification was statistically more precise than AJCC classification (0.687 versus 0.605, P<0.001). The same results can also be determined in the validation cohort (0.715 versus 0.640, P<0.001). Furthermore, a prognostic nomogram including independent factors was constructed. The constructed nomogram showed good performance according to the calibration curve.

Conclusion

The clinical value of LNR level was preferable to classic N stage in colon cancer patients. Our proposed classification based on LNR and AJCC T category can effectively differentiate patients with varied survival outcomes.

Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience

Objective

This study aims to establish the actual validity of the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients, and to verify differences of survival and disease-free interval.

Methods

Patients referred with colorectal cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery between January 1997 and December 2011 were included. Lymph node ratio, TNM staging and survival were extracted from surgical, histological and follow-up records.

Results

Two hundred eigthy six patients with different stages of colorectal cancer underwent surgery, with comparison of survival prediction based on lymph node ratio and TNM staging. The overall survival rate was 78.3%, the recurrence rate was 11.9% and the mortality rate was estimated as 21.7%. Univariate analysis in relation to survival was significant for the following variables: serum level of CEA, CA 19.9 value, degree of histological differentiation, and tumor growth. There weren’t any statistically significant differences for the LNR (LNR </ ≥0.16: p = 0.116). The TNM system was effective both in discriminating between survival stages (Stage II vs. Stage III: p = 0.05) and in differentiating sub-groups (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

LNR alone could not be considered a better prognostic factor than the TNM system. However, future studies are needed in a larger number of patients with a standardized surgical, pathological and medical protocol.

The adequacy of lymph node clearance in colon cancer surgery performed in a non-specialist centre; implications for practice

BACKGROUND

Despite recent medical advances, surgery remains the mainstay treatment in colon cancer. It is well established that better patient outcomes are achieved when complex surgery including pancreatic, oesophageal and rectal surgeries are carried out in high-volume centres. However, it is unclear as to whether or not colon cancer patients receive the same benefit. Lymph node adequacy is a key performance indicator of successful oncological colonic resection which impacts on patient outcome.

AIM

To assess the adequacy of lymph node clearance during colonic resection performed with curative intent in a non-specialist centre post introduction of the National Cancer Strategy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed of a prospectively maintained database examining the lymph node clearance of all oncological resections for colon cancer over a 7-year period (Nov 2010-Dec 2017) at a satellite unit with links to a regional specialist centre. Primary outcome measured was the number of lymph nodes retrieved. Secondary outcomes included resection margins, 30-day complication rate and survival at 1 year. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, N.Y., USA).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-seven patients were included. Mean age was 71.0 ± 11.6 years. Majority were male (n = 90, 53.6%). The majority of resections was right sided (n = 112.66.7%) with 78.6% of all resections being undertaken electively. All margins were free of tumour. The average lymph node count was 19.93 ± 8.63 (4.62) with only 17 (10.2%) of specimens containing < 12 nodes. The anastomotic leak rate was 3.3%. There was no association between surgeon or pathologist volume, nor emergent status and achieving oncological lymph node count (p = 0.14, 0.29, 0.97). 90.5% of patients were alive at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that colonic cancer surgery can be safely performed in a non- specialist centre with technical outcomes comparable to nationally reported figures.

Lymph node yield and tumour subsite are associated with survival in stage I-III colon cancer: results from a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that apart from tumour and nodal status, a range of patient-related and histopathological factors including lymph node yield and tumour location seems to have prognostic implications in stage I-III colon cancer. We analysed the prognostic implication of lymph node yield and tumour subsite in stage I-III colon cancer.

METHODS

Data on patients with stage I to III adenocarcinoma of the colon and treated by curative resection in the period from 2003 to 2011 were extracted from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, merged with information from the Danish National Patient Register and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 13,766 patients were included in the analysis. The 5-year overall survival ranged from 59.3% (95% CI 55.7-62.9%) (lymph node yield 0-5) to 74.0% (95% CI 71.8-76.2%) (lymph node yield ≥ 18) for patients with stage I-II disease (p < 0.0001) and from 36.4% (95% CI 29.8-43.0%) (lymph node yield 0-5) to 59.4% (95% CI 56.6-62.2%) (lymph node yield ≥ 18) for patients with stage III disease (p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival for tumour side left/right was 59.3% (95% CI 57.9-60.7%)/64.8% (CI 63.4-66.2%) (p < 0.0001). In the seven colonic tumour subsites, the 5-year overall survival ranged from 56.6% (95% CI 51.8-61.4%) at splenic flexure to 65.8% (95% CI 64.5-67.2%) in the sigmoid colon (p < 0.0001). In a cox regression analysis, lymph node yield and tumour side right/left were found to be prognostic factors. Tumours at the hepatic and splenic flexures had an adverse prognostic outcome.

CONCLUSION

For stage I-III colon cancer, a lymph node yield beyond the recommended 12 lymph nodes was associated with improved survival. Both subsite in the right colon, as well as subsite in the left colon, turned out with adverse prognostic outcome questioning a simple classification into right-sided and left-sided colon cancer.

A Review of Current Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Reporting

Context.—

Pathologic assessment of colorectal cancer resection specimens plays an important role in postsurgical management and prognostication in patients with colorectal cancer. Challenges exist in the evaluation and reporting of these specimens, either because of difficulties in applying existing guidelines or related to newer concepts.

Objective.—

To address challenging areas in colorectal cancer pathology and to provide an overview of the literature, current guidelines, and expert recommendations for the handling of colorectal cancer resection specimens in everyday practice.

Data Sources.—

PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) literature review; reporting protocols of the College of American Pathologists, the Royal College of Pathologists of the United Kingdom, and the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum; and classification manuals of the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control.

Conclusions.—

This review has addressed issues and challenges affecting quality of colorectal cancer pathology reporting. High-quality pathology reporting is essential for prognostication and management of patients with colorectal cancer.

Management of Pt1 tumours removed by endoscopy during colorectal cancer screening: Outcome and treatment quality indicators

INTRODUCTION

Limited information is available about outcomes of patients with malignant adenomas endoscopically resected at screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic quality indicators and to correlate them with clinical and surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed endoscopic and histology characteristics of all pT1 tumours endoscopically removed at the time of colonoscopy assessment in subjects with a positive screening test result in the context of a population-based program.

RESULTS

392 pT1 tumours were completely removed by endoscopy (en-bloc = 86.7%, piecemeal = 13.3%) and the histology report was considered complete in 83.2% of cases. Treatment was limited to endoscopic excision for 120 patients (30.7%, Group 1), 272 (69.3%, Group 2) underwent radicalisation surgery. In patients who had at least 1 lymph node examined, the rate of nodal involvement was 5.4% (13/239); no metastatic node was found in the 21 (27.6%) out of 76 patients with low-risk adenomas, who underwent surgery.

CONCLUSION

Risk of nodal involvement in colorectal pT1 tumours is well predicted by known histologic features also in a screening setting, although it was lower than among patients from clinical series. Surgical overtreatment is still significantly present and there is ample room for improvement regarding diagnostic and therapeutic flow-chart.

T1 colon cancer in the era of screening: risk factors and treatment

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for lymph node positivity in T1 colon cancer and to carry out a surgical quality assurance audit.

METHODS

The sample consisted of consecutive patients treated for early-stage colon lesions in 15 colorectal referral centres between 2011 and 2014. The study investigated 38 factors grouped into four categories: demographic information, preoperative data, indications for surgery and post-operative data. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the significance of each factor both in terms of lymph node (LN) harvesting and LN metastases.

RESULTS

Out of 507 patients enrolled, 394 patients were considered for analysis. Thirty-five (8.91%) patients had positive LN. Statistically significant differences related to total LN harvesting were found in relation to central vessel ligation and segmental resections. Cumulative distribution demonstrated that the rate of positive LN increased starting at 12 LN harvested and reached a plateau at 25 LN.

CONCLUSIONS

Some factors associated with an increase in detection of positive LN were identified. However, further studies are needed to identify more sensitive markers and avoid surgical overtreatment. There is a need to raise the minimum LN count and to use the LN count as an indicator of surgical quality.