Heart Rate reduction by IVabradine for improvement of ENDothELial function in patients with coronary artery disease: the RIVENDEL study

Ivabradine in the Prevention, and Reduction in Size, of Perioperative Myocardial Injury in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery for Acute Fracture

BACKGROUND

Perioperative myocardial injury is common after major noncardiac surgery and is associated with adverse outcomes. This study investigated the use of ivabradine in patients undergoing urgent surgery for fracture.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Participants were enrolled 1:1 into ivabradine or placebo arm, and study drug was commenced before operation and continued for 7 days or until discharge. High-sensitivity troponin I was measured daily using Abbott Alinity analyzer and assay, and heart rate data were obtained using continuous Holter monitoring. A total of 199 patients underwent acute orthopedic surgery, 98 in the ivabradine group and 101 in the placebo group. The mean age was 78.7 years (range, 77.5-79.9 years), with 68% women. The average heart rate was 5 to 11 beats per minute lower in the ivabradine group compared with the placebo group at all time points (P<0.001 for all). There was no statistically significant difference between the ivabradine and placebo groups in the number of patients who had perioperative myocardial injury: 28.6% versus 31.6% (P=0.71). In patients with perioperative myocardial injury, average peak troponin was 168.8 ng/L (±431.2 ng/L) in the ivabradine group and 2094.5 ng/L (±7201.9 ng/L) in the placebo group (P=0.16). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in 30-day mortality, blood pressure, stroke, or major adverse cardiovascular event.

CONCLUSIONS

Starting ivabradine preoperatively in elderly patients requiring acute surgery for fracture did not result in a statistically significant difference in the incidence of perioperative myocardial injury. There was no statistically significant difference in morbidity, mortality, or adverse events between treatment groups.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; Unique identifier: ACTRN12616001634460p.

Impact of Endothelial Dysfunction on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndromes Treated With Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

Studies investigating clinical outcomes of patients with or without endothelial disfunction (ED) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) using second generation drug eluting stents (DES) are lacking.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 109 patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES due to stable CAD between December 2014 and September 2016. ED was evaluated evaluating the flow mediated dilation (FMD) at the brachial artery level and defined by an FMD < 7 %. Primary outcome were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), secondary outcomes were target vessel failure (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause death.

RESULTS

Five-year follow-up was available in all patients. Median FMD didn't significantly differ between patients who experienced the outcome and those who didn't [no TVR vs. TVR: p = 0.358; no MI vs. MI: p = 0.157; no death vs. death: p = 0.355; no MACE vs. MACE: p = 0.805]. No association between ED and an increased risk for the primary outcome as well as for the secondary ones was evident [MACE: 17.0 % vs. 14.3 %, HR 0.87 (0.33-2.26), log rank p = 0.780; TVR: 9.4 % vs. 5.4 %, HR 0.53 (0.12-2.24), log rank p = 0.384; MI: 3.7 % vs. 8.9 %, HR 2.46 (0.47-12.76), log rank p = 0.265; death: 7.5 % vs. 3.6 %, HR 0.53 (0.09-2.90), log rank p = 0.458]. These findings were confirmed using a lower threshold of FMD to define ED and at one-year landmark analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

ED is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events at long-term follow-up in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing PCI with second generation DES.

Pleiotropic vascular effects of ivabradine in streptozotocin-induced diabetes

AIMS

Ivabradine (IVA) reduces heart rate (HR) by inhibiting hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels in sinoatrial node. Studies suggest that IVA has other beneficial effects on cardiovascular system that are not related to its effect on HR such as prevention of endothelial injury and the antioxidant effects. In addition to sinoatrial node, HCN channels exist in other tissues and their expression pattern differs in certain pathologies such as hypertension and hypertrophy. We investigated the mechanism of IVA effect in the setting of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced cardiovascular damage. Direct effects of IVA and their mechanism on thoracic aorta as well as possible prevention of vascular dysfunction in diabetes were investigated in this study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effects of IVA on vascular function were investigated in control and STZ-diabetic rats. Some control and diabetic rats were treated with IVA. IVA treatment prevented diabetes-induced increase in plasma p-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 levels and the decrease in nitric oxide content in the aortas of diabetic animals. When added to isolated organ bath, IVA induced concentration-dependent relaxations in thoracic aorta. Pre-incubation with Nω-Nitro- L -arginine methyl ester reduced IVA-induced relaxations. Expression patterns of all isoforms of HCN proteins were affected by both diabetes and IVA treatment.

CONCLUSION

IVA improves vascular function in diabetes and HCN channels support vascular activity against damaging effects of diabetes. IVA may be added to prevent diabetic cardiovascular dysfunction with these beneficial effects that are unrelated to its primary mechanism of action.

Effects of adding ivabradine to usual care in patients with angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of ivabradine on outcomes important to patients with angina pectoris caused by coronary artery disease.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review. We included randomised clinical trials comparing ivabradine versus placebo or no intervention for patients with angina pectoris due to coronary artery disease published prior to June 2020. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, Cochrane methodology, Trial Sequential Analysis, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, and our eight-step procedure. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and quality of life.

RESULTS

We included 47 randomised clinical trials enrolling 35 797 participants. All trials and outcomes were at high risk of bias. Ivabradine compared with control did not have effects when assessing all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.13), quality of life (standardised mean differences -0.05; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.01), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.07; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.18) and myocardial infarction (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.16). Ivabradine seemed to increase the risk of serious adverse events after removal of outliers (RR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11) as well as the following adverse events classified as serious: bradycardia, prolonged QT interval, photopsia, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Ivabradine also increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.16). Ivabradine might have a statistically significant effect when assessing angina frequency (mean difference (MD) 2.06; 95% CI 0.82 to 3.30) and stability (MD 1.48; 95% CI 0.07 to 2.89), but the effect sizes seemed minimal and possibly without any relevance to patients, and we identified several methodological limitations, questioning the validity of these results.

CONCLUSION

Our findings do not support that ivabradine offers significant benefits on patient important outcomes, but rather seems to increase the risk of serious adverse events such as atrial fibrillation and non-serious adverse events. Based on current evidence, guidelines need reassessment and the use of ivabradine for angina pectoris should be reconsidered.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018112082.

Non-INvasive Functional and Anatomic vascular evaluation for the prediction of coronary artery disease: The NINFA study

BACKGROUND

Endothelial function, as assessed with flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) correlate with the presence and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated the incremental value of a combined evaluation of FMD and IMT in predicting the presence of CAD over traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 497 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary angiography were enrolled in this study. Brachial artery FMD and ultrasound-based carotid IMT were evaluated prior to angiography. CAD was defined as the presence of a ≥ 50% stenosis in at least one coronary artery. SYNTAX score was also calculated. Patients were categorized based on the presence of FMD and IMT values below or above gender-specific median.

RESULTS

Patients with both low FMD and high IMT presented the highest prevalence of CAD, number of diseased vessels, and SYNTAX score. At multivariate analysis, the combination of low FMD and high IMT was the strongest predictor of CAD (OR 3.63, 95% CI 2.19-6.02; p < .001). At ROC curve analysis, the addition of FMD and IMT to a model of traditional risk factors improved the predictive power for the presence of CAD (area under the curve [AUC] of risk factors model 0.715; AUC of risk factors + FMD + IMT 0.780; p < .001). The addition of FMD and IMT to the model of risk factors correctly reclassified 24.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined evaluation of endothelial function and subclinical atherosclerosis at the carotid artery level improves the ability of traditional risk factors to identify patients with CAD.

Ivabradine Ameliorates Kidney Fibrosis in L-NAME-Induced Hypertension

Hypertension-induced renal injury is characterized by structural kidney alterations and function deterioration. Therapeutics for kidney protection are limited, thus novel renoprotectives in hypertension are being continuously sought out. Ivabradine, an inhibitor of the I_f current in the sinoatrial node reducing heart rate (HR), was shown to be of benefit in various cardiovascular pathologies. Yet, data regarding potential renoprotection by ivabradine in hypertension are sparse. Thirty-six adult male Wistar rats were divided into non-diseased controls and rats with N^G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)-induced hypertension to assess ivabradine's site-specific effect on kidney fibrosis. After 4 weeks of treatment, L-NAME increased the average systolic blood pressure (SBP) (by 27%), decreased glomerular density (by 28%) and increased glomerular tuft area (by 44%). Moreover, L-NAME induced glomerular, tubulointerstitial, and vascular/perivascular fibrosis by enhancing type I collagen volume (16-, 19- and 25-fold, respectively). L-NAME also increased the glomerular type IV collagen volume and the tubular injury score (3- and 8-fold, respectively). Ivabradine decreased average SBP and HR (by 8 and 12%, respectively), increased glomerular density (by 57%) and reduced glomerular tuft area (by 30%). Importantly, ivabradine decreased type I collagen volume at all three of the investigated sites (by 33, 38, and 72%, respectively) and enhanced vascular/perivascular type III collagen volume (by 67%). Furthermore, ivabradine decreased the glomerular type IV collagen volume and the tubular injury score (by 63 and 34%, respectively). We conclude that ivabradine attenuated the alterations of glomerular density and tuft area and modified renal fibrosis in a site-specific manner in L-NAME-hypertension. It is suggested that ivabradine may be renoprotective in hypertensive kidney disease.

Five-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after heart transplantation

Background

Cardiac graft denervation causes inadequate sinus tachycardia in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) which is associated with reduced survival. This study investigated the 5-year results of heart rate control with ivabradine or metoprolol succinate in patients after HTX.

Methods

This registry study analyzed 104 patients receiving either ivabradine (n = 50) or metoprolol succinate (n = 54) within 5 years after HTX. Analysis included patient characteristics, medication, echocardiographic features, cardiac catheterization data, cardiac biomarkers, heart rates, and post-transplant survival including causes of death.

Results

Demographics and post-transplant medication revealed no significant differences except for ivabradine and metoprolol succinate use. At 5-year follow-up, patients with ivabradine had a significantly lower heart rate (73.3 bpm) compared to baseline (88.6 bpm; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (80.4 bpm; P < 0.01), a reduced left ventricular mass (154.8 g) compared to baseline (179.5 g; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (177.3 g; P < 0.01), a lower left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP; 12.0 mmHg) compared to baseline (15.5 mmHg; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (17.1 mmHg; P < 0.01), and a reduced NT-proBNP level (525.4 pg/ml) compared to baseline (3826.3 pg/ml; P < 0.01) and to metoprolol succinate (1038.9 pg/ml; P < 0.01). Five-year post-transplant survival was significantly better in patients with ivabradine (90.0%) versus metoprolol succinate (68.5%; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Patients receiving ivabradine showed a superior heart rate reduction and a better left ventricular diastolic function along with an improved 5-year survival after HTX.

Effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on vascular stiffness and endothelial function in chronic stable coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiological and clinical studies have shown a relevant association between heart rate and cardiovascular mortality. Experimental studies identified vascular effects of heart rate reduction with the If channel inhibitor ivabradine. Therefore, the effects of heart rate reduction on endothelial function and indices of arterial stiffness were examined in patients with stable coronary artery disease in a prospective, placebo-controlled clinical crossover study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (18 men and 5 women) with a resting heart rate (HR) of at least 70 beats per minute (bpm) and stable coronary artery disease were enrolled in this study. In a cross-over design, all patients were treated with ivabradine (Iva, 7.5 mg b.i.d.) and placebo for 6 months each. Iva reduced heart rate by 11.4 bpm (Iva 58.8 ± 8.2 bpm vs. placebo 70.2 ± 8.3 bpm, P < 0.0001). Augmentation index (AIx75), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and central aortic blood pressure were measured using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor). HRR by Iva increased AIx75 by 12.4% (Iva 24.3 ± 10.5% vs. placebo 21.3 ± 10.1%, P < 0.05) and reduced cfPWV by 14.1% (Iva 6.3 ± 1.7 m/s vs. placebo 7.3 ± 1.4 m/s, P < 0.01). Iva increased mean central blood pressure by 7.8% (Iva 107.5 ± 15.4 mmHg vs. placebo 99.1 ± 12.2 mmHg, P < 0.001). Endothelial function was determined measuring the flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. HRR by Iva increased FMD by 18.5% (Iva 7.3 ± 2.2% vs. placebo 6.0 ± 2.0%, P < 0.001). Aortic distensibility was characterized by MRI. HRR by Iva increased aortic distensibility by 33.3% (Iva 0.003 ± 0.001/mmHg vs. placebo 0.002 ± 0.010/mmHg, P < 0.01) and circumferential cyclic strain by 37.1% (Iva 0.062 ± 0.027 vs. placebo 0.039 ± 0.018, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Heart rate reduction with Iva increased endothelium-dependent vasodilation and reduced arterial stiffness in patients with stable CAD. These findings corroborate and expand the results collected in experimental studies and indicate the importance of heart rate as a determinant of vascular function.

Role of endothelial dysfunction in determining angina after percutaneous coronary intervention: Learning from pathophysiology to optimize treatment

Endothelial dysfunction (EnD) is a hallmark feature of coronary artery disease (CAD), representing the key early step of atherosclerotic plaque development and progression. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed daily worldwide to treat symptomatic CAD, however a consistent proportion of patients remain symptomatic for angina despite otherwise successful revascularization. EnD plays a central role in the mechanisms of post-PCI angina, as it is strictly associated with both structural and functional abnormalities in the coronary arteries that may persist, or even accentuate, following PCI. The assessment of endothelial function in patients undergoing PCI might help to identify those patients at higher risk of future cardiovascular events and recurrent/persistent angina who might therefore benefit more from an intensive treatment. In this review, we address the role of EnD in determining angina after PCI, discussing its pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic perspectives.

Resting Heart Rate and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from a 10-Year Follow-Up of the CORFCHD-PCI Study

Background

The relationship between heart rate in CAD patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and had long-term outcomes over up to 10 years of follow-up has not been investigated.

Methods

All patients were from the CORFCHD-PCI, a retrospective cohort study that included a total of 6050 CAD patients who underwent PCI from January 2008 to December 2016. One patient was excluded due to a lack of heart rate data. Ultimately, 6049 patients were enrolled. The primary outcome was long-term mortality after PCI.

Results

Patients were divided into 5 groups according to heart rate quintiles: 1st quintile (heart rate <66 beats/min; n=1123), 2nd quintile (heart rate ≥66 beats/min to 72 beats/min; n=1010), 3rd quintile (heart rate ≥72 beats/min to 78 beats/min; n=1442), 4th quintile (heart rate ≥78 beats/min to 84 beats/min; n=1211), and 5th quintile (heart rate ≥84 beats/min; n=1263). After multivariate Cox regression analyses, the respective risks of ACM, CM, and MACEs were increased 79.1% (hazard risk (HR) = 1.791, 95% CI: 1.207-2.657, P=0.004), 56.9% (HR = 1.569, 95% CI: 1.019-2.416, P=0.041), and 25.5% (HR = 1.255, 95% CI: 0.990-1.590, P=0.060) in the 4th quintile and 98.7% (HR = 1.987, 95% CI: 1.344-2.937, P=0.001), 98.8% (HR = 1.988, 95% CI: 1.310-3.016, P < 0.001), and 0.36.1% (HR = 1.361, 95% CI: 1.071-1.730, P=0.012) in the 5th quintile compared with those in the 1st quintile. Patients with a heart rate of ≥80 beats/min had 89.4%, 115.2%, and 39.1% increased risk of ACM, CM, and MACEs, respectively, compared to those patients with a heart rate of <80 beats/min.

Conclusion

The present study indicated that the resting heart rate is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcomes in CAD patients who underwent PCI.

Ivabradine in Cancer Treatment-Related Left Ventricular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Patients developing cancer treatment-related left ventricular dysfunction (CTrLVD) require a prompt therapy. Hypotension, dizziness, and fatigue often limit the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and β-blockers (BB) in cancer patients who may already be afflicted by these symptoms. Ivabradine is a heart rate-lowering drug that does not cause hypotension and may be used in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to investigate the role of ivabradine to treat CTrLVD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis in a cohort of 30 patients with CTrLVD (LVEF < 50%) receiving ivabradine on top of the maximal tolerated dose of ACEi/ARB and BB was performed. We evaluated cardiovascular treatment, oncologic treatment, LVEF, functional class (New York Heart Association [NYHA]), and fatigue during the study period.

RESULTS

Ivabradine was initially started at the dose of 2.5 mg/b.i.d. in most patients and then carefully titrated. Hypotension (70%) and fatigue (77%) were the main causes limiting the treatment with ACEi/ARB and BB. After a mean follow-up of 6.5 months, LVEF increased from 45.1% (SD = 6.4) to 53.2% (SD = 3.9; p < 0.001). When patients were analyzed according to the type of cancer therapy, no difference in LVEF changes across the groups was found. NYHA class ameliorated in 11 patients, while fatigue improved in 8 patients. No serious cardiovascular side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to improve symptoms and LVEF in unfit cancer patients makes ivabradine a reasonable pharmacological tool for treating CTrLVD.

Serum endocan and circadian heart rate variability in non-dialysis stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is very common now and is associated with high overall and cardiovascular mortality. Numerous studies have reported that elevated heart rate (HR) is a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. We investigated the link between serum endocan and circadian heart rate variability in non-dialysis stage 5 CKD patients.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 54 prevalent n non-dialysis stage 5 CKD patients (32 males, aged 48.2 ± 14.92 years). HR was measured with an automatic system. Serum endocan level was analyzed by ELISA.

RESULTS

Night/day HR ratio was independently predicted by serum endocan level (P < 0.01) and hypertension history (P < 0.05). Adjusted R² of the model was 0.222.

CONCLUSION

Increased serum endocan is significantly associated with circadian heart rate variability in non-dialysis stage 5 CKD patients. Further investigation is needed to explore the potential benefits of serum endocan lowering therapy in this patient group.

Ivabradine: Evidence and current role in cardiovascular diseases and other emerging indications

Increased heart rate (HR) is associated with deleterious effects on several disease conditions. Chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the cardiovascular diseases with recurrent hospitalization burden and an ongoing drain on health-care expenditure. Despite advancement in medicine, management of CHF remains a challenge to health-care providers. Ivabradine selectively and specifically inhibits the pacemaker I(f) ionic current which reduces the cardiac pacemaker activity. The main effect of ivabradine therapy is the substantial lowering of HR. It does not influence intracardiac conduction, contractility, or ventricular repolarization. As shown in numerous clinical studies, ivabradine improves clinical outcomes and quality of life and reduces the risk of death from heart failure (HF) or other cardiovascular causes. Recently updated HF guidelines recommend ivabradine as a class II indication for reduction of HF hospitalizations. Based on the principle of benefits of reduced HR, the ivabradine in patients with ischemic heart disease, sepsis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome has also been studied. It can also be a useful agent for HR reduction in patients with contraindications to use beta-blockers or those who cannot tolerate them. In this review, we provide an overview of efficacy and safety of ivabradine and its combination with currently recommended pharmacological therapy in different conditions.

Role of ivabradine and heart rate lowering in chronic heart failure: guideline update

INTRODUCTION

This review summarizes the current management of heart failure (HF) in patients with reduced ejection fraction and the potential role of heart rate lowering agents in select populations, as recommended in the updated guidelines. Areas covered: PubMed was searched for studies that evaluated the role of heart rate lowering or ivabradine in HF management. Expert commentary: Targeting heart rate may offer benefit when added to renin-angiotensin aldosterone antagonists, and beta-blockers. Ivabradine is a heart rate lowering agent that acts on the funny current (I_f) in the sinoatrial node, thereby reducing heart rate without directly affecting cardiac contraction and relaxation. Clinical data from a phase III trial demonstrated that ivabradine reduced the composite end point of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for worsening systolic HF, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile in patients receiving standard of care therapy. These data, in addition to more recently published guidelines, suggest ivabradine as a promising new treatment option for lowering heart rate after optimizing standard therapy in select patients with chronic HF.

Safety profile and efficacy of ivabradine in heart failure due to Chagas heart disease: a post hoc analysis of the SHIFT trial

AIMS

The SHIFT trial showed that ivabradine reduced heart rate (HR) and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Concerns remain over the efficacy and safety of ivabradine on heart failure (HF) due to Chagas disease (ChD). We therefore conducted a post hoc analysis of the SHIFT trial to investigate the effect of ivabradine in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SHIFT was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in symptomatic systolic stable HF, HR ≥ 70 b.p.m., and in sinus rhythm. The ChD HF subgroup included 38 patients, 20 on ivabradine, and 18 on placebo. The ChD HF subgroup showed high prevalence of bundle branch right block and, compared with the overall SHIFT population, lower systolic blood pressure; higher use of diuretics, cardiac glycosides, and antialdosterone agents; and lower use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker or target daily dose of beta-blocker. ChD HF presented a poor prognosis (all-cause mortality at 2 years was ~60%). The mean twice-daily dose of ivabradine was 6.26 ± 1.15 mg and placebo 6.43 ± 1.55 mg. Ivabradine reduced HR from 77.9 ± 3.8 to 62.3 ± 10.1 b.p.m. (P = 0.005) and improved functional class (P = 0.02). A trend towards reduction in all-cause death was observed in ivabradine arm vs. placebo (P = 0.07). Ivabradine was not associated with serious bradycardia, atrioventricular block, hypotension, or syncope.

CONCLUSIONS

ChD HF is an advanced form of HF with poor prognosis. Ivabradine was effective in reducing HR in these patients and improving functional class. Although our results are based on a very limited sample and should be interpreted with caution, they suggest that ivabradine may have a favourable benefit-risk profile in ChD HF patients.

Role of ivabradine in management of stable angina in patients with different clinical profiles

In chronic stable angina, elevated heart rate contributes to the development of symptoms and signs of myocardial ischaemia by increasing myocardial oxygen demand and reducing diastolic perfusion time. Accordingly, heart rate reduction is a well-known strategy for improving both symptoms of myocardial ischaemia and quality of life (QOL). The heart rate-reducing agent ivabradine, a direct and selective inhibitor of the I_f current, decreases myocardial oxygen consumption while increasing diastolic time, without affecting myocardial contractility or coronary vasomotor tone. Ivabradine is indicated for treatment of stable angina and chronic heart failure (HF). This review examines available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of ivabradine in stable angina, when used as monotherapy or in combination with beta-blockers, in particular angina subgroups and in patients with stable angina with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) or HF. Trials involving more than 45 000 patients receiving treatment with ivabradine have shown that this agent has antianginal and anti-ischaemic effects, regardless of age, sex, severity of angina, revascularisation status or comorbidities. This heart rate-lowering agent might also improve prognosis, reduce hospitalisation rates and improve QOL in angina patients with chronic HF and LVSD.

Allicin attenuates lipopolysaccharide‑induced acute lung injury in neonatal rats via the PI3K/Akt pathway

Allicin is an oxygenated carotenoid derivative that exhibits strong antioxidant activity, which effectively removes reactive oxygen species from the body and has important roles in disease prevention and treatment. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether allicin attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‑induced acute lung injury (ALI) in neonatal rats and the potential underlying mechanisms. An LPS‑induced ALI neonatal rat model was utilized to assess the therapeutic value and mechanisms of allicin. Following allicin treatment, increases in lung wet/dry ratio and the lung protein concentration were significantly suppressed in LPS‑induced ALI neonatal rats. Furthermore, ELISA results demonstrated that allicin significantly reduced the levels of malondialdehyde, tumor necrosis factor‑α and interleukin‑6, and increased superoxide dismutase activity, in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of LPS‑treated rats. Additionally, allicin administration increased the protein expression of Bcl‑2 and reduced the activity of caspase‑3/-9, as determined by western blotting or ELISA, respectively, and increased phosphatidylinositol 3‑kinase (PI3K) and phosphorylated‑Akt protein levels, in LPS‑treated ALI neonatal rats. The results of the present study indicate that allicin attenuate LPS‑induced ALI in neonatal rats by ameliorating oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Allicin may be used for development of a novel drug for treatment of ALI.

Treatment of Stable Angina with a New Fixed-Dose Combination of Ivabradine and Metoprolol: Effectiveness and Tolerability in Routine Clinical Practice

Introduction

In this prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study, the effectiveness and tolerability of the first fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of the selective heart rate reducing agent ivabradine and the beta-blocker metoprolol was evaluated in stable angina pectoris (AP) patients in a clinical practice setting.

Methods

Stable AP outpatients received a FDC of ivabradine and metoprolol (b.i.d.) for 4 months, in addition to cardiovascular standard therapy. Resting heart rate (HR), number of angina attacks, short-acting nitrate consumption, severity of symptoms (assessed by patient judgment and documented by CCS score) and tolerability were documented. Medication adherence was assessed by a modified four-item Morisky questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were performed on all data.

Results

A total of 747 stable AP patients (mean age, 66.4 years, 62% male, 50% and 31% with previous PCI and myocardial infarction, respectively) were included. Apart from ivabradine and beta-blockers as free combination, most frequently used concomitant standard medications at baseline were aspirin (68%), statins (71%), ACEI/AT1-blockers (76%), diuretics (35%), and calcium antagonists (15%). Highly prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (86%), hyperlipidemia (65%), and diabetes (35%). After 4 months, switch to treatment with the FDC was associated with a significant reduction in mean HR by 10 bpm. Proportion of patients with ≥ 1 angina attacks/week decreased from 38 to 7%. Patients in CCS class 1 increased (25 to 63%), while they decreased in CCS class 3 (19 to 5%). Medication adherence was also significantly improved (p < 0.001 for all changes from baseline). Mostly mild adverse events were documented in 5.4% of patients.

Conclusions

In these stable AP patients in a real-life setting, treatment with a FDC of ivabradine and metoprolol was associated with reduced HR and angina symptoms, while exercise capacity (CCS score) was improved. These effects may be mainly mediated by the increased medication adherence of patients observed with use of the FDC formulation.

Funding

Servier

Trial registration number

ISRCTN51906157

Duration of chronic heart failure affects outcomes with preserved effects of heart rate reduction with ivabradine: findings from SHIFT

AIMS

In heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and sinus rhythm, heart rate reduction with ivabradine reduces the composite incidence of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

It is unclear whether the duration of HF prior to therapy independently affects outcomes and whether it modifies the effect of heart rate reduction. In SHIFT, 6505 patients with chronic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%), in sinus rhythm, heart rate of ≥70 b.p.m., treated with guideline-recommended therapies, were randomized to placebo or ivabradine. Outcomes and the treatment effect of ivabradine in patients with different durations of HF were examined. Prior to randomization, 1416 ivabradine and 1459 placebo patients had HF duration of ≥4 weeks and <1.5 years; 836 ivabradine and 806 placebo patients had HF duration of 1.5 years to <4 years, and 989 ivabradine and 999 placebo patients had HF duration of ≥4 years. Patients with longer duration of HF were older (62.5 years vs. 59.0 years; P < 0.0001), had more severe disease (New York Heart Association classes III/IV in 56% vs. 44.9%; P < 0.0001) and greater incidences of co-morbidities [myocardial infarction: 62.9% vs. 49.4% (P < 0.0001); renal dysfunction: 31.5% vs. 21.5% (P < 0.0001); peripheral artery disease: 7.0% vs. 4.8% (P < 0.0001)] compared with patients with a more recent diagnosis. After adjustments, longer HF duration was independently associated with poorer outcome. Effects of ivabradine were independent of HF duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of HF predicts outcome independently of risk indicators such as higher age, greater severity and more co-morbidities. Heart rate reduction with ivabradine improved outcomes independently of HF duration. Thus, HF treatments should be initiated early and it is important to characterize HF populations according to the chronicity of HF in future trials.